#this is mostly just about my diss draft which is not getting written
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
every now and again i am hit by the knowledge that i am a deeply cringe, untalented, unmotivated person. and then i just have to go on with my day.
#ow ow ow ow my brain literally hurts thinking about this#this is mostly just about my diss draft which is not getting written#but it's also about everything else in my life or lack thereof#the diss is just emblematic#ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh#and then some people have the audacity to say#oh i'm sure that's not true#literally one what do you know#and two give me one counter example#you can't so there#i'm surrounded by people that are at the top of their class#with job offers from any place they might concievably want to go to#who also manage to juggle rich social lives and organising events and working on solo hobbies#who are interesting and well read and are generally good people besides#and then there's me#even this is cringe!!!!!!#the fact that i am even letting myself post this is unbelievably cringe and pathetic#i would like to not be me like effective 22 years ago#pls#vent
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
“Femfirmative Fics”
I’ve had a version of this post saved in my drafts for months, but it never felt like a good time to post it. But I guess now would be an appropriate time, because of this femfirmative blog. I personally find the whole concept of it insulting - to say that our writing so misogynistic that there needs to be an entire blog dedicated to filtering out our “bullshit,” as she calls it.
I always, always treat Molly well in my fics. In all my experience of reading Johnlock fics, the women (especially Molly and Irene) always have way more dignity and agency than is ever given to them in the show, so I don’t know where this claim is coming from:
In 99.9% of the Johnlock fics I’ve read, Molly is given happiness, and isn’t hung up on Sherlock for years and years like she is in the show. Of course, there’s always going to be some outliers you could dig up. No fandom is perfect. But every single popular “big” fic I’ve read treats her well.
Mary ranges from a friend of John’s, to temporary girlfriend, to ex partner, to villain - yes, villain. Because choosing to explore a characters’ darker sides which are shown explicitly in the show on more than one occasion is not “ridiculing” or “tearing her down.” And even if you’re not interested in a fic like that, it takes two seconds to just read the tags. That’s what they’re there for.
Idk if the runner of this blog (who is a multi shipper but mostly a Sherl0llian) is trying to be insulting with her wording, or just genuinely isn't reading the right fics. But either way, the idea that we’re misogynists has been around in the fandom for awhile, and I want to take a closer look at some of the reasons why. Because it’s mostly supported by people taking legitimate arguments and rewording/exaggerating them until they’re unrecognizable, leaving out key points, judging the all of us based on a small percentage that they know most of us disagree with.
So here goes:
1. Not liking Mary - First of all, people who say this can never decide on their definition of “don’t like.” There are plenty of Johnlockers who love Mary and/or were hoping to see her become a kickass villain. It is possible to like a character who is a villain. And yes, there are some who don’t like Mary for perfectly valid reasons - shooting and almost killing the main character for no reason being among them. People often like to reduce this issue down to “we hate her because she gets in the way of two dicks touching.” This argument completely overrides all of the horrible things Mary canonically did, and the numerous surface level reasons to dislike her. It’s just a convenient one-liner for them to pull whenever someone points out canon facts about her from the show - not to mention it’s an extremely homophobic thing to say. Mary is a dynamic, fleshed out character who has made morally questionable (and flat out wrong) decisions, so it’s expected that there will be a wide range of opinions on her.
1. Saying Mary is a villain - This is misogynistic how? Some of the best villains in popular media are women, and are sometimes even fan favorites. If this reading of her character had no basis whatsoever, then yeah, I can understand how it’d be seen as a convenient way to “get her out of the way.” But what people like to ignore is that there are numerous subtextual AND surface level clues pointing to her being a potential villain. The most obvious being her trying to kill Sherlock, the most subtle being her similarities to Moran from canon, and a whole bunch in between. There is a reason this theory exists - it’s totally plausible and would have been awesome. But it’s just more convenient for people who hate Johnlockers to dismiss it as misogynistic.
2. Not liking Molly- Again, this definition of “don’t like” pretty much just boils down to the fact that we don’t ship her with Sherlock…. I mean that’s pretty much all I have to say on this one. There’s not much else I can say. There are Johnlockers who love Molly, and those who don’t care so much for her, and everything in between. The same way that there are fans who like, dislike, or are neutral towards other minor characters like Irene or Mycroft. (And the same way that there are some Sherl0llians who openly hate John, but get angry if someone doesn’t like Molly. I’v never read their stuff but I think it’s safe assumption to make that those people’s hatred of him leaks into some of their fics. I HIGHLY doubt John is treated with the utmost dignity and kindness all the time in their fandom).
3. Reducing Molly and other female characters to mirrors - This one applies to tjlcers, not all Johnlockers. A common thing for anti-tjlcers/ other shippers to say is “[Female character] is not a mirror! She’s her own person!” Two points here. 1. Being a mirror really isn’t reduction at all. Of course she’s her own person! But that’s not to say that when there are such blatant parallels between her and one of the leads, maybe just maybe those were put there for a reason. Being a mirror is basically the same concept as being foil, except it’s through similarities instead of contrast. I don’t see how this is a reduction. If that’s the case, then any time a female character is used as a foil in literature, is it sexist too? 2. How is it sexist when tjlc reads both male and female characters as possible mirrors? What about the gay innkeepers? Sholto? Mr. Holmes? Or Ajay, who strongly paralleled Mary?? Not sexist then, is it?
Now let’s look at how Johnlockers- generally speaking- actually do view the women in the show. (Again, we’re not a hive mind, so there will be some who disagree but here we go:)
Mary: see above
Molly: see above
Hudders: Love her
Mummy Holmes: Love her
Rosie: Wish she’s had an actual purpose in the plot instead of being a prop for some “awwws” and then disappearing until the end
Irene: Badass lesbian. ACD feminist icon. Wish she’d beaten Sherlock like she did in the canon. Too bad Moffat’s writing of her is misogynistic to the core and she had to fall for him and be weakened by her sentiment instead. Good thing there’s fanfic!
Janine: Super funny, great brotp potential with Sherlock. Wish she could have returned to the show. So much potential, what with her connections to Magnussen’s network, friendship with Mary, and budding friendship with Sherlock
Eurus: Canon villain. Won't apologize for not liking her. Doesn't appear in most johnlock fics, although i do know of some great ones that include her and make her far more interesting and fleshed out than a mind-controlling sociopath.
The claim that our fics are misogynistic is absurd and comes from absolutely nowhere. Obviously, you could dig and find outliers where the woman are treated badly. The same way that you could find Sherl0lly fics that treat John horribly if you wanted.
My point is, is it some huge problem that makes this femfirmative blog necessary? Absolutely not.
I don’t think having blog a dedicated to reccing Johnlock fics that have well-written women is a bad idea, necessarily. My problem is the blog runner’s approach.
This easily could’ve been a fun idea aiming to promote our work instead of presenting it like a filter for those who want a safe place from the dark, scary Johnlock tag on AO3. She introduced it by subtly and not-so-subtly dissing Johnlockers, making wild claims about our writing, calling us names, and then switching to praising our fics (but it’s too bad we’re so sexist, right?)
She also could’ve added more johnlocky tags to the post to help it get to our side of the fandom. Instead she just used “jlock,” the tag for those who don’t ship it (which slightly makes me question the intentions of this blog).
She also could’ve tagged some Johnlock rec blogs who would’ve been happy to help spread the word instead of only tagging a Sherl0llian (another questionable thing about this).
Heck, I even would’ve been down to send along some recs, if this hadn’t been approached with all all the petty insults and complaining about how hard it is to find a Johnlock fic that isn’t sexist (it’s not hard at all). But why would I want to participate in something that’s openly insulting, made by someone who posts wank about Johnlockers all the time on her normal blog. Our most popular rec blog already has a ton of lists entirely dedicated to the women. We don’t need to look any further than her and others to find fics that this blog calls “femfirmative.”
#sherlock#bbc sherlock#johnlock#femfirmative blog#women of bbc sherlock#fandom misogyny#fandom discourse
11 notes
·
View notes
Note
oh god, you know I want to ask you all of these. So 1, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 15!
OK ITS VERY LONG I'm soz
send me a fanfic question
1. What is your favorite fic you have under your belt?OK UM. lmao okay my best writing, i think, comes in my liv fics (TRAGIC) but for the idea and the weight of emotion and, y'know, the way thinking about retiring footballers makes my heart shatter into a million pieces, on the horizon across the field (U KNO THIS). I think it’s also bc it’s very United and Gary centric and looking back at the stuff I’ve written, I don’t really do that a lot?? I prolly should tbh. But that image of Gaz back in OT for possibly the last time, imagining himself - not even on the field again, but there as a boy again, that was Very Emotional TM to me.
5. What’s your favorite headcanon you use in fics?Ok I have three? The first is Gaz and pasties bc that came from like 2 tweets and I don’t even know if that’s his favourite food (he said once it was Chinese but Butty also said ‘everything’ and I trust Butty) but somehow that’s become almost accepted everywhere which is hilarious to me. The second is Phil and frogs bc that was literally a joke from me trying to think of how to fit ‘lords a’leaping’ into a fic BUT IT BECAME A THING and it still makes me giggle. And finally it’s Scholesy’s catchphrase ‘don’t be [insert joke here]’ bc I like to think that’s as close to his ridiculously cutting one liners I’m ever going to get.
6. What’s the detail you wait on bated breath for readers to notice?well!! I do like to put little things in here and there, depending on the fic; mostly little references to actual events or things that you might only know if you knew the players or the club or w/e very well (although I do usually explain these in the notes). for example, in beville’s dust and bones and fairy tales, Gaz mentions the Boro game in ‘98, and if you didn’t know United you probably wouldn’t have known that it was the last game they played and lost before they won the treble, but later on by knowing that it sort of gives it a poignancy since Gaz is dying and that’s…idk…what he thinks of?
How much do you like symbolism in your fics?I LOVE SYMBOLISM, I probably don’t usually do it very well but I do. I think the clearest example of symbolism was Gerlonso’s boat in softly, fiercely, I set myself on fire, because they never actually got the boat but it was always something there? for them? to have. also symbolism in this rly old beville 2.0 fic with the sweets and broville. I prolly also use a lot of symoblism regarding clubs and what they mean without really thinking about it?? bc clubs!! and things you can’t really say in words!!
What’s a fanfic idea you haven’t done yet?I have…around 10 pages of fic ideas I need to write LMFAO. one day…sobbing as I drag my hands down my face… what I really want to do is xabifips or thomasxabi though bc I’m so interested in that and Sabs and I have been talking about it a lot and it gives me feelings!!!! but I need to do more research on bayern first. ALSO ALSO I DESPERATELY want to do a redders character study because he’s so maligned and misunderstood!!! just bc he’s so bad at punditry everyone disses him but have you seen him play?? he was so good. he was fucking incredible. and his injuries are made fun of a lot but no one ever thinks of how absolutely shattering it must have been for someone who was that good to be copped out just because he broke a lot, through no fault of his own. and all this pent up wasted potential and being seen as a bit of a silly sod but still??? being such a good?? person?? the way he loves on all of his ex-teammates, the way he puts all of his guests at ease by including them and talking to them, how he treats everyone the same even though it’d be easy for him not to given his background and pedigree. I HAVE A LOT OF REDDERS FEELINGS OK ;—–;
Give us a snippet of something from your WiPs!hmmmm - I’ve had this beville wip in my drafts for more than a year and idk what it was supposed to be about - I think it was supposed to be how becks always comes back to gaz and there was supposed to be something about colours and things and I didn’t really know how to string it all together buT it started off nice??
Red When David is five, he falls down and scrapes his knee. It’s as red as the Coppell jersey on his back.
Red, again When David is fourteen, he gets another scrape. This one has soft eyes and calls himself Gary.
AND THAT’S AS FAR AS I GOT after that it all sort of descends into sentimental blandness that I’ve written again and again and ughhhhh idk what to do with it
Thank you for asking bb ily
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'VE BEEN PONDERING IPHONE
I think it's easier to see, and more importantly, if you think of while you're employed by the company and get an option to maintain their power, and isn't too fussy about how. I'm not saying founders with families should uproot them to move halfway around the world; that might be easy. But apparently hackers are particularly curious, especially about how things work. You're not bracketing the problem. Sheep act the way they wait. So you don't have an iPhone, for example, would not work well with hackers. When I talk to don't know whether this happens because they're innumerate, or because their mother had one, you were squeezing the organization that was going to be one investor who gives them the first month's bill.
That's very cheap, and b I'm pathologically optimistic about people's ability to change. It turns out that looking at things from someone else's point of view, to be able to avoid having the round occupy your thoughts, if you have to design your society in a way that's more valuable to you than that. A lot of doctors worry that if they can find someone to handle the paperwork for them. That's normal for startups.1 Do not, however, approach our goal from another direction, by using ourselves as guinea pigs.2 It's because the company is about to expire at least, that worry will now be out in the end. But it was mysterious to me that any employer would be reluctant to express in front of you, and it will become as big as Google might well get it wrong. A lot of startup culture will thus be driven by a thousand rowers. 4, whereas xxx and porn individually have probabilities in my corpus of.
Does anyone believe they would notice the anomaly, and not dissing users.3 As I was writing this, but that I often spent money I desperately needed on stuff that I didn't.4 But it didn't matter exactly what the customers tell them to get into the deals they want. Of course, you don't have to be able to start successful startups. Einstein, Marie Curie, and George Washington Carver. If you use all the tokens, whereas I only use the 15 most interesting to know.5 Someone riding a motorcycle isn't working any harder. So it was in order to do it as a joke.6 You don't seem to be indispensable. During interviews, Robert and Trevor and I do because we always have, and Jessica does too, mostly, because she's so good that her stories don't seem made up. They insist on it. Excite, WebCrawler, InfoSeek, Lycos, and HotBot.
I can see the apples, they can start to see growth, they claim they were your friend all along, and are often mistaken about that.7 Some of the founders spent all their time programming. In the worst case, it was not till we were in our twenties that the truth came out: my sister, then about three, had accidentally stepped on the cat and broken its back. I didn't learn anything from philosophy papers; I didn't learn much in Philosophy 101. I was surprised how much fun the summer was for us.8 If someone who had to process payments before Stripe. But I don't think this is something intrinsic to programming, though.9 Thanks to Sam Altman, Paul Buchheit, Jessica Livingston, and Robert Morris for reading drafts of this.10 The market was pioneered by upstarts like Apple. Kerry ultimately lost 49-51, exit polls gave him a 52-48 victory.11 Incidentally, America's private universities are one reason there's so much venture capital. So if one group is a minority in some population, pairs of them will amount to anything.
Wild animals are beautiful because they have no redundancy. I've often had a juicy bug to track down. If you use all the tokens, meaning those with probabilities far from.12 Hard as it is in business.13 Many people feel confused and depressed in their early twenties be their own bosses, they rise to the occasion. But that is exactly the wrong way: they have so much more wealth than another. Observation confirms this too: cities either have a self-indulgent in the sense that we encourage the startups we funded, in the final version of an essay.14 One expert on entrepreneurship told me that what he liked about my essays was stuff I only thought of when I sat down and thought about what it takes to hear it. Compared to IBM they were like Robin Hood.
Thirty years later Facebook had the same sort of insight Socrates claimed: we at least knew we knew nothing. Investors have much higher standards for companies that have an exit strategy—meaning companies that could do it than literally making a mark on the world, we tell startups they can blame us. That might seem a prudent choice to write it yourself, then convince them. I usually tell founders to give the other side. And since no one is doing them yet. How could they be? The best ideas are also the most selective, because they know that as a question, not an associate.15
That's made harder by the fact that they have less reputation to protect. They got in fights and played tricks on one another. The Catch es If it were a property of the subject or the object if subjects all react similarly.16 That doesn't mean the company has succeeded. A startup could also give better deals to investors they expected to help them.17 Plus as a consulting company, or just bust. If there's one thing all startups have to worry about. Otherwise I just worked. Bill Gates knows this.18
Notes
Which means one of the editor, written in Lisp.
Norton, 2012. 5,000. Like us, they will only be a good open-source projects now that the only companies smart enough to turn Buffalo into a great programmer might invent things an ordinary one?
What should you even be working to help the company, and graph theory. I still shiver to recall. Cell phone handset makers are satisfied to sell them technology.
But the Wufoos are exceptionally disciplined. There's a good way to fight.
But Goldin and Margo think market forces in the Neolithic period. Handy that, go talk to corp dev guys should be protected against such tricks initially.
Obviously this is an acceptable excuse, but I wouldn't want the first question is not just for her but for the difference is that you're not even be symbiotic, because you need.
At one point they worried Lotus was losing its startup edge and turning into a significant effect on the critical path that they imitate even the most difficult part for startup founders and one VC.
And what people actually paid. If a man has good corn or wood, or at least what they made, but getting rich from a 6/03 Nielsen study quoted on Google's site.
Labor. Doing things that don't raise money, the government had little acquired immunity to tax rates. The other extreme, the closest most people are trying to steal a few people who run them would be unfortunate.
All you need to know exactly how a lot on how much you get to college, you'll find that with a faulty knowledge of human nature is certainly not impossible for a long time for your middle initial—because it has to their software that was more because they need to be tweaking stuff till it's yanked out of a lumbar disc herniations, but at least one beneficial feature: it has to be very hard to make a fortune in the belief that they'll be able to protect against truly determined attackers. Unless you're very docile compared to adults.
The conventional 1 in 10 success rate for startups, which I warn about later: beware of getting rich, purely mercenary founders will do that. The banks now had to work with me there. The biggest counterexample here is that you'll have to resort to in order to test whether that initial impression holds up.
Perhaps the solution is to the margin for error. Then Josh Wilson came in to pick a date, because they are like, etc, and the 4K of RAM was in his twenties than any of the companies that an investor they already know; but random is pretty bad.
Some would say we depend on closing a deal led by a big change in the early 90s when they decide you're a loser they're done, lots of customers you need to get great people. 01. As always, tax rates have had to pay out their earnings in dividends, and the cost of writing software goes up more than linearly with its size. Sullivan actually said form ever follows function, but you should always absolutely refuse to give them up is the desire to protect themselves.
They'd be interchangeable if markets stood still.
A lot of detail. VCs already are, but less than 500, because the median total compensation, including the order and referrer. Maybe it would have gotten the royal raspberry.
Some of the x division of Megacorp is now very slow, but a blockhead ever wrote except for that reason. Perhaps this is also the main effect of low salaries as the cause.
And since everyone involved is so pervasive how often the answer. We just store the data, it's cool with us he would presumably have got more of the biggest winners, from hour to hour that the most successful companies have little do with down rounds—like full ratchet anti-dilution provisions, even to inexperienced founders. The empirical evidence suggests that if you have two choices, choose the harder.
So for example, would be more alarmed if you have a connection with Aristotle, but they start to finance themselves with retained earnings was one in an era of such regulations is to imagine cases where VCs don't invest, regardless of how hard they work. Currently the lowest rate seems to be, yet. A Plan for Spam. Most of the auction.
#automatically generated text#Markov chains#Paul Graham#Python#Patrick Mooney#startups#Aristotle#Wilson#standards#redundancy#venture#counterexample#provisions#cause
0 notes