#this is how you Victim Complex and Abuse
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
The reason I keep banging the Jiang Fengmian drum so hard is not that he did nothing wrong--he's definitely in contention for best parenting in this book but that bar is in the ground--but because most of the takes I see about him are so extremely bad.
If you want to slag him off for trying to make choices that would hurt no one, and winding up properly protecting no one as a result, that's valid! That's an interesting and text-based critique, which opens into his parallels with Lan Xichen!
If you want to blame him for being weirdly over-invested in Wei Wuxian and Jiang Cheng being bffs, that's fair, that definitely contributed to the weirdness between them. If you want to say he was a poor communicator, that he fundamentally misunderstood his son, that he failed to be emotionally available in a way his kids could get much use out of, even that he should have figured out a way to stop Yu Ziyuan from creating such a hostile environment, all of that is fair game!
If you want to tackle how the worst thing he did to his kids was die I am so interested in how Wei Wuxian went on to abandon A-Yuan by going to his death, and how that might be tied to how his primary adult role model tied him to a boat and went off to a fight he knew he was going to lose.
After his parents had already left him like that once before, presumably less intentionally.
But no, instead I keep seeing that Jiang Fengmian didn't care. That he never expressed affection. That he actively participated in Yu Ziyuan's fucky game of forcing proxy conflict onto the boys instead of constantly trying (and failing) to shut it down, or that he ignored her bad behavior because it didn't affect him, or that he fought with her constantly, or that he was too much of an unmanly coward to stand up to her when she wanted something.
All of which are directly in contradiction to every scene he's in, and several of which manage to invert or erase the actual conflicts between him and his wife that were the source of all that tension.
And which are really interesting, because some of the most intractable elements are ideological--Yu Ziyuan is fundamentally a conservative and Jiang Fengmian seems to want to be an egalitarian, which ofc matched poorly with his hereditary authority as patriarch of a large sect.
The fact that the bit where we get to actually see him failing to parent Jiang Cheng consists of him gently and firmly trying to correct Jiang Cheng's ethics when what was actually needed in that moment was reassurance for the well-founded insecurities that were causing him to be a little bitch, only for Yu Ziyuan to charge in and make everything fifty times worse, is so much more interesting than literally any version of this family dynamic I have seen in fic. It's to the point I'm relieved when writers kill Jiang Fengmian off, because it means they probably won't feel the need to character-assassinate him too badly.
The number of people I've seen come right out and say some variation of 'men can't be abused' is killing me here. No, Yu Ziyuan wanting to hurt her husband does not constitute sufficient proof that he abused her first and deserved it! That's not how anything works!
#hoc est meum#a lot of this is people projecting cliches and daddy issues and gender shit onto cql#where jfm's characterization mostly didn't make the jump#but still it's like#wtf man#why are we taking yu ziyuan's word about fault at face value#when the fact that she talks a lot of bullshit is so firmly established?#you don't have to Let Him Off his own mistakes for the challenge factor of being married to an abuser if you don't want#but can we stop victim-blaming the guy for ten minutes???#mdzs#meta#jiang fengmian#spousal abuse#characterization#sometimes fanon is Worse#a very annoying part of this is it means really good jiang cheng pov that gets into his issues is super thin on the ground#because no one wants to wrestle with the complex layers of how he felt like his dad didn't love him#or at least not the way he needed to be loved#how he's sort of aware he's bringing his mother's interpretation to things#and that she wasn't entirely right BUT#how he has this deep dreadful certainty that in the most fundamental way she was entirely correct: that jiang cheng was just like her#selfish and violent and unable to manage his own emotions at all#and therefore didn't deserve to be loved#which yu ziyuan so clearly and tragically believed about herself and thus made true
327 notes
·
View notes
Text
Jesse explaining that although all three boys generally experienced the same physical abuse, Roman has internalized his experience as a victim in a different way than Kendall and Connor.
“I would suggest Logan would have cuffed and hit all the boys at different times in their lives. I think the difference for Roman maybe is that he feels like he was bullied in the domestic environment and so we can all react to things in different ways. I think Connor and Kendall probably have experienced that and have managed to accommodate it without it being a big part of their psychology whereas I think Roman being that beaten dog and being - there’s often a dynamic isn’t there with bullied people as sort of needing the feeling of negative attention that you get from that and I think he’s become, not addicted to it, but related to it.”
Excerpt from Firecrotch and Normcore: They Like to Watch (recorded at Edinburgh Fringe Festival) – Aug. 29, 2023
#I haven’t seen it circulate tumblr so I’m not sure how popular this take is here#but I think it fits when you think about Austerlitz and the scripts from The Disruptor and Honeymoon States#I really do wonder so much about Connor’s childhood though#like what on Earth went on in that house while Logan was on his way up#I can see it being both worse and better because on the one hand there’s no one watching but on the other hand…there’s no one watching#Man I wish we had more Connor lore#also endlessly fascinated by Roman’s victim complex#roman roy#kendall roy#logan roy#connor roy#hbo succession#jesse armstrong#cw abuse#cw parental abuse#cw physical abuse
312 notes
·
View notes
Text
In the back of my mind it’s always there 🥲💥💥💥💥
Pulling out my white pen from 6th grade for curly because this game has me in a chokehold
#mouthwashing#genuinely is a really hard and complex mental battle on the subject of curly’s redeemability/goodness as a person#it’s hard to categorize someone who is both complicit and enabling of abuse while being a victim of said abuse#makes ya think#I don’t like him or Jimmy but there’s room for growth and sympathy with curly where there isn’t with Jimmy#and I do think on some level he knows now how helpless Jimmy made anya and how awful it feels to be in that position#but it sucks that as a friend and a leader he couldn’t even fathom her situation being bad and was instead sympathetic towards Jimmy#until he lost his autonomy to jimmy’s selfish behavior and it was too late to do anything#let an abuser off the hook long enough and it turns back at you in the end#good shit this game is#mouthwashing curly#captain curly#mouthwashing anya#mouthwashing jimmy#cw blood#cw body horror#cw abuse
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
thinking about how akio sees his younger self in utena and wondering if there's any fondness there. doesn't change the horror of what he does to her obviously but i do wonder
#akio and utena#m#long ramble in the tags sorry:#the thing about akio is that he's so evil bit he's also so human#he has feelings. i just don't know what they are (if anything) toward his victims#he loves anthy at the very least i'm sure of that. even if he hates her too. just like she loves and hates him. the lines are blurry.#and i just. i have to wonder whether any of that extends to utena at all. we know anthy at times feels similarly about utena and dios#(and akio by extension.) the simultanious love and resentment. so it's not too unlikely i think.#like. even though he never had anything but bad intentions in getting close to her#i'm not sure it's possible to do everything he did and feel nothing#not that he has any meaningful amount of guilt or remorse for it. i don't think that.#and i obviously don't think he “loved” her in any of the ways she might have thought he did#but did he not care at all? did he not feel any kind of fondness or sympathy or just. idk. pity? for her?#whatever the case it wasn't enough to reconsider having her killed so you know. how much does that actually matter anyway#idk. i think about it a lot. how abusers are rarely entirely indifferent toward their victims#the role he's playing in her life is so fucked up but it IS a role he's playing and i wonder how much he you know... internalizes it?#how much does he believe the illusion of family that he invites her into? because akio DOES often buy into his own illusions.#(similarly i think it's possible that akio is fond of touga too. their mentor-protégé relationship is horrible and abusive#but that doesn't make it less real. you know? maybe real is the wrong word.)#when he talks in episode 25 about wanting utena and anthy closer that's obviously so he can continue to groom her#but is there something genuine there too? i don't know.#again. it obviously does not make anything he does better or even different. but it is interesting to think about to me.#on the other side of that coin does seeing his own past youth and naivete and desire to do good that he (maybe) once had#reflected back at him through her mean anything?#is there resentment there? that she is what he couldn't be? or more likely he just thinks that idealism is stupid.#either way it's something he wants to take from her. anyway ramble over.#i talk a lot about utena's feelings toward akio (familial vs romantic love and the way the two are intertwined in fucked up ways)#but not much the other way around. probably because utena is actually a sympathetic character whose feelings the show very clearly#wants you to analyze and think about.#which is... less true for akio i think. though he's still a complex character with complex motives. he's just harder to get a grasp on.
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
spent the first hour and change at work deleting some old files and am having a grand ol time laughing at myself for not realizing i was a lesbian sooner
#vulnerable tag rambles ahead please be kind abt them i didnt intent to ramble this much but i dont wanna delete it eitehr#me to every single man i have ever dated after 6mo-1y: yeah hey this really isnt working out i dont really know why but i really hate mysel#and i dont want to blame you because i dont think you did anything inherently wrong here; i think this is something about me but i need#space to figure out why im feeling this way [every single one reacted by telling me No i wasnt allowed to leave btw]#i hold very complex feelings about these relationships esp bc of them ending in very violent/chaotic ways most of the time#but its interesting to look back at it all and realize ive left every man for the same reason (which is that ive hated myself Every Single#Time ive dated a man) and its funny bc i recognized the self hate pretty early on w/ cishet men but when it came to queer men it was#much more confusing (esp w/ nto knowing Any lesbians at that point in my life). im so happy im a lesbian tbh#i have a lot of issues w/ the racism fatphobia and transmisogyny present in lesbian groups#and also coming out as a lesbian really truly saved my life. before i met my wife i was quite literally in a 3yr abusive relationship that#definitely would have died in if i hadnt realzied i was a lesbian and ran from him#its also weird seeing liek the hard evidence of the things that happened to me btween 2016-2020 tbh#cause that was such a bad time of my life. i truly dont know how i survived it but im so glad i did#like the three major relationships in my life b4 meeting my wife was: guy who was in college when i was in HS who stalked me when i left;#guy who was a year younger than me who cheated on me the entire time while telling me he was being victimized (he wasnt; this was very mess#guy who saw the very messy toxic ldr i was in and helped me dump my ex then decided that meant we were in a relationship [insert 3 yrs here#and admittedly all 3 years with him werent the same level of abusive but it was definitely unhealthy from the start considering I Didnt Kno#we were together until he wanted to celebrate vday and got mad i didnt know our anniversary - and like this isnt including the other stuff#that happened between those Relatonships[tm] (cause ive never been monogamous; these were just the Major Relationships)#like i genuinely think if i hadnt come out i'd be dead rn given just how dangerous my relationships were/continued getting#i am also so tired now that ive seen all this cause like. fuck i can barely believe it and i not only lived it but have PTSD about it#i should write about my life sometime. i feel like it'd be cathartic to try and make a tangible timeline and stories from the years ang stu#anyway yeah. be nice about the tag rambles. dont message me with pity or curiosity or anything about this. i dont usually talk abt this stu#publicly bc i hate the ways ppl start tryign to baby me when they realize my life has been extremely fucked up until only a few years ago#n im still working on accepting kindness from others bc of [insert life traumas here] but its a long process so pls respect my need for jus#being heard rn w/o too much pressure< 3 (but ig if u do read this can u like it cause i feel a little crazy seeing all the evidence of the#stuff i experienced now also cause fuck ik logically it was but also i cant believe it was all real still yk)
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
What if we suggested that if you can't defend the Miraculous S5 ending without sounding like Mother Gothel, don't do it at all?
#of course the other option of just making completely baseless claims isn't that great either#ml s5 criticism#ml writing salt#ml writing criticism#ml critical#(I don't like that tag but whatever)#ml s5 finale#abuse#abuse apologism#whatever the writers may have intended. the thing that they actually produced#turned out abuse apologia and a power fantasy for abusive parents with a god/martyr complex#and a justification for why child abuse victims are just too emotionally immature and volatile to deserve control of their lives#'but Gabriel loved Adrien!!!' okay do you have any idea how many abusers use that to justify violating their victims?#it's sincerely jarring how comfortable the fandom has become with abuse apologia ever since the s5 finale.#it makes the fandom kinda unsafe to navigate for abuse victims who might not wanna keep running into people#repeating the same justifications ad nauseaum that irl abusers use.
49 notes
·
View notes
Text
said it once, saying it again outside of tags: the person you are when you're being abused is not truly reflective of who you are. in an abusive situation, you are in constant survival mode. you are behaving in ways that you think a) are going to please the abuser and b) are going to keep you from being hit, berated, or otherwise punished. you do not get to be who you really are because that is legitimately dangerous. it creates a vulnerability you cannot afford. you need to act with your self-preservation instincts in mind first and foremost, and self-preservation often conflicts with authenticity and honesty. so when you're looking at those texts, judging build for being such a thoughtless, hateful person, try to understand what it's like mentally to have your back to the wall for months or years on end.
#'well i wouldn't do -- ' is that so? is that REALLY so?#people who haven't been abused love to talk a big game about how they're better or smarter or wouldn't act like that#you don't KNOW until you are in a perpetually unsafe environment how you will react#chances are it's not flattering#when confronted with constant trauma the brain does not function in the ways you think or wish it would#it will fundamentally alter everything about you#to expect someone who is in constant danger to react with nothing but kindness and generosity is unrealistic and unfair#what many of you are doing is creating the need for a perfect victim#your long-suffering cinderella who never lost hope#you want a shining cipher of a person to believe in and not a messy complex honest human being who reacts in ways you may not like#god help any of you if you ever face a hundredth of the amount of shit you throw at build on the daily#build jakapan
67 notes
·
View notes
Text
I find the intersection between the grandeur of theatre (or at least the impression of grandeur in a dire environment) and the performative nature of torture (thinking back to Shakespearean tragedies / Renaissance practices) to be really interesting.
The trial is both a performance and a demonstration. The presence of the audience oscillates between an ignorant cheering crowd and a knowing jury. Both the “prosecuted” (Louis, Claudia and Madeleine) and the “prosecutors” (Santiago, Lestat and lurking Armand) inhabit the same theatrical space and garner the same applause, but for VERY different reasons. The coven indulge in the suffering. The suffering are subject to the burning light of day.
The stage serves as a place of multitudes. It is entertainment and a tragedy and a courthouse and a future justification and a racist display and a confession booth and a prison. It would be so difficult to exactly pin-point it’s function because it has so many.
I need to study this show under a microscope. Anon !
#I am late to the discussion but my god I love this show#and as a theatre nerd I had to make some sort of comment on the complexities of the scene#which I don’t think that I articulated fully because there is so much going on#but I would also like to add that all of the discourse of ‘who behaves the worst’ and ‘who behaves the best’ seems to be counterproductive#iwtv is very nuanced in its portrayal and no single character has any moral authority#they may be disillusioned by a sense of morality but it is still a blinding one#and the show also comments on how the abused can also become the abuser#all of the characters were or are or can be victims but they also fuck eachother up#again it is late and my comments may not be fully fledged but you get where I’m going with this#everyone is fucked up#and that’s what makes it so good#iwtv spoilers#iwtv#amc iwtv#iwtv season 2
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Black family character study snippet part two - just because im a liiiiitle obsessed actually <3
In January of 1925, an astronomical discovery was published in a catalogue by Vesto Slipher, who had managed to determine the radial velocities of a number of spiral nebulae from their redshifts. It was an important day, as his hypothesis found that several spirals were moving away from the Milky Way Galaxy at speeds too grand for them to be contained within it; this discovery was the birth of what would later be known as galaxies. It was on this day that Walburga Black was born. She was a small of a child as she was an adult, born with coal-black hair and eyes that had a softer shade of blue than the silvery one that they quickly turned as she aged, shifting so rapidly that one should think you could have seen it happening in real time if you'd looked closely enough. Soon enough, they were as silvery as her mother's - and her father's. Silvery as stardust. Silvery as the galaxies that had not yet been discovered. She was the first-born daughter of Pollux and Irma Black, both of whom were simultaneously her first cousins, and both of whom were born with pitch black curls, with aquiline noses and star-like eyes and cheekbones that grew prominent once they hit puberty, hollowing out their cheeks until shadows fell from the tall chandeliers of Grimmauld Place to slither below the curves of their skulls and gutter the meat of their faces until there was nothing but arched hollows of shade contouring their cheekbones. An unmistakable lack of tone or tint in the skin of Walburga's ancestors was another distinguishable trait; they were as pale as corpses, all of them alike. Walburga had hardly even gained a flush as she gave birth to her first son. Sirius had almost died at his birth, choked on the umbilical cord that had been connecting them since the early stages of his embryological development. Walburga had cried about it until her chest ached once she'd finally been alone, which wasn't until eight days later; she had been under the unbroken surveillance of her husband, who was of the belief that she might try to take the life of the infant, had she been left alone with him.
#listen i just spat out 4k words today this is unedited as shit#i was in a charitable mood ((i was desperate for someone to scream about them with))#there are thoughts in my head. thoughts!!!!#oh yeah and walburga is here too!!!!! the goal is that everyone in this fic gets a three dimensional complex character and a tragic fate<3#me when shes not JUST the abusive mum. me when it makes sense why shes like that. me when shes a victim too. me when fear is#an inheritable burden#me when it still destroys regardless of how you justify it
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
im so serious some t*m drake stans are so misogynistic when it comes to stephanie brown I'm not even kidding holy shit
#jay speaks#sorry. its the truth#turn tim into the victim all you want to appease your projected victim complex can we at least leave steph alone tho#like. woooooooow#ur poor little helpless little white queer boy. and the toxic abusive ex girlfriend of his. good riddance amirite#im sorry guys i cannot do this anymore. i am at my limit#some peoples attitudes towards steph are just soooooo misogynistic its insane#all to uphold and make a white (only recently confirmed) queer boy look better by comparison. what a breakthru guys ur geniuses#never before seen im in awe#i say all of this as someone who likes tim too btw. he is literally one od my faves#he is higher on my list than steph is. but like. come on guys#are we just going to forget about how much of a garbage boyfriend tim was to steph#or how badly he treated her even when they weren't dating 💀 hello#did we read the same comics. i won't say steph was perfect but like tim was an asshole lol#she was a teenaged girl and im afraid that was mostly her biggest offense. tim was a little misogynist god love him#both were young and stupid and teenagers. w/e. don't act like steph was the sole bad actor tho even in recent comics#sorry tim wasn't written to be as much of a victim as u would have liked#tag rant#no actually. gotta add. don't we just love putting down a woman to uplift the treasured mlm ship#and make it seem better. like the better option. isnt it fun to do that right#banging my head against the wall im so done with this
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Fuck Wilbur Soot. Support Shubble.
I've tried to get rid of as many reblogs that I've made of content regarding Wilbur (and I don't tend to interact with content regarding SMPs as much lately anyway), but as there's so many, I don't know if I'll be able to get rid of all of them. So just a notice if you happen to see any of those reblogs, I do NOT support him in any way, shape or form.
That said, I absolutely support Shubble. I've vaguely known about her for some time, and I plan on getting into her content more now (not just because of this situation, I've been interested in viewing her content for some time now).
I'm a bit emotionally all over the place right now, so that's probably all I'm gonna say on it. I don't know if I'll be interacting with any content regarding the situation other than this post, so yeah.
#tw abuse#support shubble#DNI if you chose to support Wilbur regardless of everything#Also don't pressure any CC who hasn't responded yet into responding immediately???#I feel like that should be common sense but ig not#Yes it would be nice to hear something#But they are all also a lot more closely connected to the situation than we are#So if its this distressing to us#when we're outsiders#I can't imagine how it must feel for those directly involved#And people have personal lives too#So they might not be able to drop everything and respond at the drop of a hat#The thing that makes me the most mad I think is that I'm a survivor of abuse#And I was unknowingly in the fanbase of an abuser#Still this isn't about me or my feelings on the situation#However complex they are#This is about uplifting Shubble and any other victims
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
rage
#having a rage moment#abt a conversation i had#abuse tw#i have like. fucking severe ptsd#not anything new#but like#ive gone through some fucked up shit#of course i'd be fucked up by it#of course i'd want help#who the fuck are you to say 'im sick of this victim complex'#I AM A VICTIM WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT#I'VE LITERALLY GONE THROUGH 10 STRAIGHT YEARS OF GASLIGHTING AND ABUSE#HOW IS THIS A 'VICTIM COMPLEX' TO RECOGNIZE THAT I'VE BEEN FUCKED UP AND WANT HELP#I HAD THREE BACK TO BACK ABUSIVE PARTNERS#WHO EACH TRAUMABONDED ME TO THEM AND THEN USED MY PAIN AGAINST ME#AND I'M SITTING HERE HAVING A PANIC ATTACK OVER NEVER BEING ABLE TO TRUST AGAIN#AND YOU SAY I HAVE A 'VICTIM COMPLEX'??????#YEAH YOU NEVER CARED YOU JUST WANTED TO GET ME TO STOP WHINING#(i fucking hate my blood family)
1 note
·
View note
Text
listen. i understand the fact that aziraphale's part of everyday is a lot of new and interesting bits of character development that are very fun to tear apart. but i've seen tons of people discussing what heaven and forgiveness and crowley-as-an-angel mean to aziraphale without the corresponding look at what it means to crowley. so i would really like to do that
cw: discussions of abuse, indoctrination, trauma, and a Really Very Long meta post
it super surprised me when s2 opened on an angel!crowley scene because that kind of scene isn't typically necessary for the kind of character he is. crowley's character is one that revolves around the absence of who he was Before -- so you can understand all that you need to know about him by the ways that he deals with what he's lost (looking at where the furniture isn't, right?). he talks about stars and creation now because they were the most important parts of his angelic life and he cannot leave them behind. he mentions how he fell for asking questions because that's still a large part of who he is; he doesn't believe in hell's mission and he questions the goals and ethics of hell/heaven (the whole graverobbing ordeal, as well as the opening in s1 with hastur and ligur where you can see that his demonic strategy is fundamentally different from more traditional demons, not to mention having a permit from heaven during the job scenes and still disobeying orders according to his own morality). we get a really solid understanding of crowley and what he's about perfectly well from his current demon iteration, because the most important tenants of his character have stayed consistent or formed after the fall.
so what do we gain by such a scene to open the season? well, we learn that this is when aziraphale met crowley for the first time, we learn that aziraphale is immediately besotted by crowley, we learn that aziraphale expresses concern for crowley's questions (and imminent fall). this scene focuses on aziraphale experiencing crowley as an angel because this is an important moment for aziraphale's story, not anything to do with how crowley is or where crowley's story is going.
some other things we know about crowley are that he is the one constantly pushing for "their own side," for separation from heaven and hell, for a person that understands him as someone outside of the angel/demon binary. crowley is the one to approach aziraphale first as agents of opposite sides on the wall of eden, to suggest the arrangement, to convince aziraphale that armageddon would be bad and that they should work together to stop it. he's the one pushing aziraphale further from acceptable angelic behavior. hell, we even find out that he tempts aziraphale into trying food for the first time, which is aziraphale's greatest vice as a character.
this isn't because crowley wants aziraphale to fall or because he's set out to corrupt an angel, though. he sees aziraphale sin (or separate himself from heaven as a collective) first with giving away his sword, then through continued conversation with crowley (The Enemy), and the various other historical scenes where aziraphale lies or indulges in consumption or doesn't follow the divine plan to a tee. this culminates in the arrangement, which crowley sees as a concrete acknowledgement of the futility of heaven and hell, along the lines of "if we can both do the other side's acts and we're both canceling each other out, what's the point in doing any of this in the first place?" (this is NOT, notably, a question on the futility of life itself. crowley covets some material items like the bentley and alcohol that point to a personal valuation of living on earth, but he also has a strong and consistent emphasis on actual, living creatures: the goats, job's children, his plants, the children drowned during the flood, the antichrist, and the line from s2e6 where he says "if heaven kills all life on earth it will be just as dead as if hell had done it.") he believes that this is a clear indication that aziraphale no longer subscribes to the traditional opinions of heaven and hell. obviously, he discovers that he's very wrong come the last scene of season two, but it's helpful to understand the mindset he walks in with.
there's been a lot of gorgeous meta about how the two of them communicate and what their relationship is like in the present, so i'll try not to reinvent the wheel too much here while i look at the conversation in everyday. there's two particular things id like to look at: how crowley can never truly tell aziraphale no (this is pretty well-established so i don't feel the need to go into it, yes?) and the consistency with which crowley denies being the angel he was before the fall -- there are the unsubtle lines about not being the angel who fell, his time as an angel being a long time ago; there's also the slightly subtler moments where he refuses to acknowledge any memory of working with any particular angel/demon during their time as angels (both the pencil-pusher demon and saraqael, if not anyone else im forgetting), as well as his rather iconic reaction to being described as good or nice (this is typically interpreted as a reaction to being seen as not demon-like, but crowley really doesn't care about demons or hell beyond what his association requires. no one cares who's doing the job so long as it gets done, yeah? its more interesting to me to see these moments as times where crowley is described in angelic terms and refuses to let himself be seen as something he can no longer be.)
so if you take crowley at his word, what does it mean to no longer be an angel?
it means that there was a point where crowley was an angel, as we've both heard and seen. it means that he spent time in heaven, had a role, experienced and valued a lot of typically angelic things like kindness and forgiveness. it means that he was eventually cast out for, as we've heard and seen, being curious and headstrong. it means that he lost his place in heaven, his role, his identity, his values and experiences (using experiences here to refer to things he has done and can no longer do, rather than his memories, since i don't have enough textual substance to discuss any ideas i might have about memory). this is the really important part, i think: that crowley had all of these things and that they were taken from him because of who he is as a person (who he already was as an angel, before the exacerbation that came when he became a demon). not only that, all of this loss also took the form of an extremely traumatic fall (as in, a single event that caused crowley not only emotional but assumably physical pain, as well as being a generally physical ordeal).
abusive situations can often thrive because of the manipulation the people within them experience. unquestionable, morally just figures like parents to children or gods to angels get away with what they do because they are able to turn the victim's doubt around onto the victim (what i do is right because i'm The Parent/God/The Boss and you as The Child/The Angel/The Employee have no right to question me, thus if you do you must be Wrong) as well as the ephemeral nature of words (did they really say that or am i exaggerating to make them seem worse in my memory? this is where the physical aspect of falling comes in). this is something i fully see happening to aziraphale within the show.
however, one of the things that can knock an abused person out of their abusive situation is something that's too big to go unquestioned and an absence of the manipulating force to direct the shape of their conclusions. this is where crowley and aziraphale's character stories differ: crowley fell, lost all connection to heaven, and then had no one to tell him heaven was in the right and he the wrong. after landing in hell (which could have also been a bad and manipulative situation) crowley is removed from the manipulating forces by being stationed on earth, where he is allowed to experience life out from under anyones thumb (relatively), process this giant trauma and loss, and find his own answers. he then does what a lot of people who have been abused do when they're no longer being abused: he goes out and does stuff that he couldn't do before. this is where he meets aziraphale, who is also stationed on earth and doing a number of (aforementioned) things that don't align with heaven. the thing that crowley doesn't understand is that aziraphale hasn't had these same experiences that lead to crowley's epiphany nor is he isolated from heaven's manipulation (often seen as gabriel in the first season and metatron in the second). each time aziraphale does something that does not align with heaven's ideals, he either sees that as a reflection of what a bad angel he is or he tries to rationalize it into fitting into his/heaven's world view (the ineffable plan. it was literally right there this entire time i could SCREAM about this GOD'S INEFFABLE PLAN)
so aziraphale is holding onto this idea of an angel that does not exist anymore and crowley is projecting an understanding of similar experiences that did not happen. they're miscommunicating, wow, what else is new? we understand that aziraphale is rationalizing and being manipulated, but why did crowley act the way he did during the fight instead of falling into the familiar and consistent pattern of following aziraphale and going where he leads?
that's right, i said i wanted to talk about how crowley can never tell aziraphale no!!
from crowley's point of view, their entire relationship revolves around their experiences on earth where he has perceived aziraphale defying heaven and he felt intense kinship with that. he's delighted about giving away the sword, he watches aziraphale eat a LOT, they definitely like to drink together, he protects aziraphale from the consequences of lying (crowley protecting aziraphale from falling deserves a billion metas right this instant really). these are all major moments to crowley where aziraphale distinguishes himself from the celestial system. when aziraphale asks crowley for things, he does them because (yes, he loves aziraphale, but also) aziraphale is the one person across heaven, hell, and earth that crowley feels he is actually allied with. he has to go through the motions with hell, deal with all of the pain surrounding heaven, but this one angel is a place where crowley can be genuine, whether that be good or bad or none of the above (this is literally manifested physically within the text with crowley's glasses). the foundation of their relationship, to crowley, is their side. this is why crowley's reaction at the end of everyday is both so intense and pivotal: aziraphale asks crowley to join heaven's side with him and crowley says no.
crowley is not an angel. when crowley was an angel, before the beginning of time, he was too incompatible with heaven and so he fell. that is what being an angel got crowley. there have been some points made about how unhappy being a demon makes crowley and how sweet and innocent he seemed as an angel, but i think that line of thinking falls into the same trap that aziraphale does, which is in assuming that being an angel is in some way inherently better than being a demon, or that crowley wasn't unhappy as an angel, or that aziraphale isn't unhappy as an angel himself. because crowley is happy, when left to his own devices or with aziraphale. his unhappiness comes from the interventions of heaven and hell within his life (thus the importance of crowley questioning the point of heaven and hell and not life itself) because he would like to be separate from them, not restored to some prior state of belonging within their system. the truth is that crowley will never become that angel that aziraphale met again, because that's not how trauma ever, ever works, but that does not mean that crowley cannot have a full and meaningful life in his current state. he's not broken, he's just someone who has been rejected by heaven.
crowley responds to the most fundamental aspect of his identity being questioned and dismissed (i can make you an angel again), with, frankly, a respectably low-key amount of upset. he tells aziraphale that they're better than their sides because his ultimate goal is to separate their side from that of heaven and hell. when aziraphale reveals that he wants to fix heaven, crowley hears him. this is so important to me, because this is a moment where crowley is trying to communicate. he changes his approach and tries to speak to aziraphale instead of reacting out of emotion. after this moment, crowley doesn't speak out of anger at all, even in response to when aziraphale does. instead, he tries to confess his feelings to aziraphale and offers up the option to leave heaven and hell behind again. this is such an important moment because it's crowley trying to break out of their long, deep-instilled habit to hide and double-speak and he gets really close to saying what he means explicitly, even factoring how intensely emotional it makes him to do so.
his offer to run away isn't done to ignore aziraphale's needs but to show him that there is another way out, if aziraphale is willing to take it. there are other options that aziraphale hasn't considered, but crowley is, because crowley is still trying to solidify the existence of their side. from their side, they are free to ignore the angel/demon dichotomy and just be themselves, whatever that looks like. this is what crowley wants, above everything else in the world.
aziraphale rejects this entire concept when he lets go of his bookshop and earth as a whole with the nothing lasts forever line. aziraphale is rejecting earth, the middle ground that they've built their entire lives together on, forcing them into the roles of angel and demon exclusively. this, of all moments, is when crowley puts his glasses back on. because he cannot be an angel, the only role left to him is demon, and thus his vulnerability is not safe or welcome to be exposed to aziraphale.
crowley tries to acknowledge their life on earth twice in the next few moments: the nightingales, which represent everything they went through in the last season (which aziraphale is not thinking about, because he's already left their role as representatives of earth and/or humanity behind) and the kiss itself, which is as explicit as crowley is physically able to be about his own feelings and the future he wants them to have on earth as their own side. he is asking aziraphale, as well as he can, to stay. he's physically closing the divide between their roles in an attempt to show aziraphale how little it all really matters in practice and
aziraphale does the most angelic thing he possible could and Forgives crowley. this is not said out of kindness or as an instinctive reaction. aziraphale is angry and upset when he says this because, in some way, he understands what his words mean even as he does not understand crowley's actions or rejection at all. he reinforces the binary between them and acts vindictively (to parallel the insistence on the apology dance after the argument in the first episode) in retaliation to crowley denying what he sees as his gracious and miraculous offer of restoration.
the most important part of crowley's character to understand in this moment is that while he wants a happy life with aziraphale more than anything, he has extremely hard limits and heaven is one of them. his boundary here is a fundamental part of him and even his deepest desires cannot overcome them. as a fallen, crowley knows that who he is as a person is not angelic. as a fallen, crowley knows what its like to lose the most important, pivotal pieces of his life and start again. as a fallen, he knows that he survived it once. he tells aziraphale don't bother.
and crowley, who will be (and always has been) a demon if it means not being an angel, who has told aziraphale that demons are unforgivable, does the only thing he can do. he leaves.
#good omens#god omens season 2 spoilers#good omens season 2#crowley#meta#warning btw this is nearly 20 paragraphs its long as fuck#i had a category 5 english major moment#i am a crowley girlie (gender neutral) and while i acknowledge the rough time the aziraphale babes are going thru the slander cannot stand#we will live in a world of complex media analysis i swear to the gods#im not aziraphale bashing but i cannot live in a world where i dont acknowledge that he's in the wrong here#which is INSANE IN ITS OWN RIGHT considering how intensely the show emphasizes the greys of morality#but the grey you get with aziraphale is that hes a victim of abuse being manipulated#his decision itself has no merit on its own standing. i would say sorry but i am not#i also disagree with the coffee theory on an ideological level regarding the art of storytelling#at most id say the fact that the coffee gets described twice in slightly different ways is strange and could be intentional.#also im writing a gomens2 fic rn that is only about 600 words shorter than this meta#why are essays so much easier than narrative writing this is awful
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Btw the “Dolores on the dotted line” quote on my header is a Lolita quote, but not in the cringe lana del rey romanticization way. Like in the “I can read books about abuse without turning them into love stories” way.
#I guess no hate to individual people who read lolita as a love story while imagining themselves as lolita#I understand the complex systems around how we as people understand the book and accept that some people will have a different takeaway#but seriously dude you aren’t supposed to take humbert at face value#I understand the book more as an exploration of the mindset of a monster#and dolores as a kindred soul for any victim who has been covered and perverted by an abusers narrative#I feel a lot in common with her- won’t go into details but suffice to say the quote isn’t a pro-humbert quote for me- but a pro-Dolores one
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
||. it's not meme weekend but you guys the "i stg stop mischaracterizing thor for the sake of your blorbo" salt is STRONG rn
#(imagine being turned into an abuser by ppl who don't even understand the character they're trying to defend by calling u that)#(imagine being torn down into some shiny blond hunk who's evil and deserves to die and not be the main character just bc ur not edgy enough#(in fact you're so complex and broody and yet rise above it that you're BORING at best and a HIMBO at worst bc ppl hate you ig)#(also how dare anybody point out that just as your brother is an abuse victim who was lied to his whole life... SO ARE YOU)#( ooc . ) — stories that leap from the page .#( salt to taste . ) — in this house we love the actual main character . crazy i know .#(sorry guys i'm mad on his behalf again)
0 notes
Text
.
#affording humanity to people who suddenly decided to afford you none is really something#but ig that's how it goes with this#when someone with a fucking complex around innocence decides your presence in their life interferes with that bc of#guilt or doubt or whatever#there's nothing stopping them from just deciding you're not worth treating as a person anymore#and bending themselves into knots to justify it to themselves by casting you as a villain#and that can only go in one direction bc that's hurtful and hurt people won't be perfect#and yeah honestly the way this kind of victim reversal is a stock standard way of acting abusively while absolving yourself of it because#the other person Deserves It so it's justified and if they try to stand up for themselves they're the one who is the aggressor#etc etc etc and the good ol 'i can't be a bad ally so they must be in the wrong' defensive spiral just makes the doubling down worse
1 note
·
View note