#this is absolutely devious

[dilf-destroyer-04]

🫦

i would let this man bang me so hard with no lube, no protection, all night, all day, from the kitchen door to the toilet seat, from the dining table to the bedroom, from the bathroom sink to the shower, from the front porch to the balcony, vertically, horizontally, quadratic, exponential, logarithmic, while I grasp for air, scream and huff, upside down on the floor, in the bed, on the couch, on the chair, being carried, against a wall, outside, in a train, on a plane, in a car, on the motorcycle, in the bed of a trunk, in a trampoline, in a bounce house, inside a pool, bent over, in the basement, against the window, having the most toe curling, toe clenching, back arching, legs shaking, fist clenching, muffled sounds, ear ringing, mouth drooling, nose drooling, ass clenching, nose sniffling, eye watering, can't take it anymore, legs divorcing and breaking in half, eye rolling, hip thrusting, earthquaking, fireworks, sheet gripping, knuckle cracking, jaw dropping, soul snatching, over stimulating, ovulating, vile, sloppy, heart wrenching, spine tingling, back breaking, atrocious, gushy, creamy, Beasley, devilishly, lip biting, gravity defying, nail biting, sweaty, feet kicking, mind blowing, body shivering, orgasmic, bone breaking, black hole cresting, devious, scrumptious, amazing, delightful, body numbing, can't walk, head nodding, volcano erupting, sweat rolling. Voice cracking, trembling, sheets soaked, hair drenched, skin peeling, pussy popping, back cuts, heavenly, devils tango, and still worth it.

[poorly-drawn-mdzs]

News spreads fast.

[First] Prev <–-> Next

[elssbethtascioni]

Rebecca Wisocky as Evelyn Powell DEVIOUS MAIDS (2013-2016)

[f1-stuff]

why did they look at each other like that...?

[gods-favorite-autistic]

Headcanon that at some point in freshman year (probably sometime after the Daybreak battle when they were like chilling for a couple of months if I’m remembering correctly) Fabian pretended to throw a party at his place to have an excuse for the Bad Kids to hang out at his house without having to admit he actually cared for them and liked hanging out with them

[drama-glob]

Someone may have already pointed this out, but given that we know the truth about Tessa now, Cyn/Absolute Solver pulling this move of possessing Uzi and flashing the message right in front of N to further manipulate him to help kill Uzi was super devious and low; granted, that's what villains do, so... >:( Thank goodness it didn't work. ;)

[amarithecat]

Dream blunt rotation this, nightmare blunt rotation that,

Edit: Also, nightmare Bottle Episode.

[ideologyofone]

Fun fact Jinx is actually talking in this scene!

[realbeefman]

my one and only qualm with frank v russia is that they de-canonized frank reynolds being a freak bitch who likes taking it up the ass. WHY are we pretending that the man who, according to artemis, FREQUENTLY needs an “anal stimulant” to get off would be weirded out by mac letting a stranger control the anal beads in his ass via remote control. he shouldve gone on a rant about the last time he had beads up his own ass until charlie mercifully swept him away to play chess and left dennis & dee even more traumatized than usual

[sapphic-bf]

okay but the scene in S2 ep. 8 when jayce:

1) apologized for being an idiot & an asshole,

2) acknowledged that mel was in pain, too,

and

3) told her that no force in this world can control her AND that she’ll never be a passenger in her own life…

yeah, i wont him.

[widowshill]

the people aren't ready to hear this but angelique arbitrarily picking quentin to decide to be in love with out of nowhere, bewitching roger into marriage and then absolutely not wanting him to touch her, and constantly pursuing men's (chiefly barn's) attention only when it's clear he doesn't want her, is soooo comp het of her.

[gio-cosmo]

We are livin our liiiivvvveeesss abound with so much informatiooonnnn

[kashilascorner]

Out of the three main villains, I think Fernando is the least bad because he does have one redeeming quality: he does loves his wife and child (literally) with all his life. Rather than a terribly bad individual, he is a profoundly misguided person. From his obsessive love to Mercedes to how he was convinced into condemning Edmond to how he betrayed Ali Tebelen. His seemingly violent character does not help. A testament of his genuine love is the fact that, despite everything, Mercedes and him do seem to have had a rather happy marital life and Albert had a good upbringing and became a good man. Also, he is not obscenely rich. Dumas goes out of his way more than once to assess that the Morcerfs, while privileged and no doubt well off, have a relatively modest fortune compared to their other peers in the novel. This, in my opinion, shows that even if he was unscrupulous in building his fortune and station in the beginning (when he was poor and had nothing to give Mercedes the life she deserved), he did not necessarily continue on that path --whether because he was not interested or because he was not clever enough or because he was more prudent but not actually less unscrupulous we could debate. Lastly, he's not entirely without remorse. When confronted by Haydée he feels some of that. In the end, understanding of the shame he has brought upon his family and how he betrayed their trust, seeing that they will never forgive him, he kills himself. Perhaps one last act of love to them as much as an act of desperation and selfishness for losing all he cared about in life.

Then you have Villefort, who is a far darker grey, a man who's obsessed with status, with himself and his name, but who ultimately had moments of "weakness": seeing Valentine's death, being moved by his past lover Hermine. To protect the status and name that's the most precious thing in his life he's willing to go to terrible extremes, even if they weigh on his conscience later. It's obvious he's capable of certain warm feelings and that he is a man who's constantly repressing himself into the image he wishes to project. He's a man who defines himself by his job and station, a man rather obsessed with work though, by his own admission, he works because that allows him to forget. That doesn't sound like someone with a clean conscience at all. He's justice, but he bends it to convenience and that is his downfall.

Lastly: Danglars. This guy is the most irredeemable of all three. Not only is he selfish and greedy and does not show a single warm feeling towards anyone in the entire novel, not even his daughter and wife. Everything he does is always under an utilitarian light. He does not even have good taste. And this whole thing started, his so terrible hatred to Edmond goes down to two things: 1 he caught him stealing (they settled that up) 2, and in my opinion most telling, he was envious. He really does not have a single redeeming quality, so in some ways he's the worst of all three main villains however I must point out that he's the only of the three who doesn't seem to have murdered anyone directly lol

[clearoranges]

Lol yeah after everything yesterday I had to make the post lol. My brain saw the other persons post and went 😈

haha i love your brain then. i’m glad someone said something.

btw, im in the middle of a wip that’s completely spiteful of the original post that started this haha. hopefully yall fw it.

[hanzajesthanza]

i do enjoy how sapkowski has returned to the striga motif for geralt in both of the standalone novels from the past two decades.

it’s not what either novel centers around, but it’s present: the events of season of storms lead up to geralt riding to vizima to take the contract. in crossroads of ravens, a similar contract from years before plays out.

if i were more cynical, i could ascribe the “return to the first episode of your character” as a bid to maximize recognition and nostalgia—if someone has read just even the first short story, then alright, they’ll recognize what’s going on here. or, capitalizing on the success of that motif, as there was and continues to be a strong reaction to the playing with roman zmorski’s story and the figure of a striga. either way, it’s a smart business move—do what worked, go back to your first wonder, your first magic trick.

but another part of me just thinks that sapkowski, after leaving the witcher theme for over ten years, then coming back, and sitting down to write on it again… has to re-associate himself with the character and how everything works. at times, to great effect: this crossroads was a very intentional re-exploration of geralt’s character.

but because writing is absolute freedom, a blank page can become anything…

he could have done anything else, and yet he decides to come back to geralt and the striga.

amusingly, i imagine it’s a bit like how a proud parent will always remember their child—even when they’ve grown up and become an adult—as how they were when they were just a small baby in diapers. that’s how they came into this world, so… that’s how they’re fondly remembered, even when they’ve grown up, got a 9-5, gotten married, moved out. after everything they’ve been put through.

it’s, “i remember when you were young,” “i remember when you came into this world.” this was his earliest incarnation, this is the simple prototype preceding the humongous machine. what i think is that the striga story is core to geralt’s character, in his author’s mind. that episode is a useful landmark to center other events around, because it was the beginning of everything.

or maybe it is just nostalgiabait. ok then i lost because i enjoyed that shit

[unavernales]

@mournus

boo is eating trash. trash is delicious and it doesn't understand why it can't! so it has a habit of sneaking through the crew's rubbish (just for a snack!) and is verrryyyyy careful not to get caught. in the middle of munching on some glass, boo is too preoccupied to notice the door opening.

"boo!" it exclaims in a panic and rushes to hide evidence of its snacking. it knows lying is wrong, but eating trash is even more wrong! and it doesn't want to be in trouble! "was cleaning! not being bad!" boo, however, is a terrible liar.