i thought i had another fundraiser appear in my inbox this morning but its vanished? if you sent me a message and i havent answered, please send again if you can!
7 notes
·
View notes
"In an unprecedented step to preserve and maintain the most carbon-rich elements of U.S. forests in an era of climate change, President Joe Biden’s administration last week proposed to end commercially driven logging of old-growth trees in National Forests.
Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, who oversees the U.S. Forest Service, issued a Notice of Intent to amend the land management plans of all 128 National Forests to prioritize old-growth conservation and recognize the oldest trees’ unique role in carbon storage.
It would be the first nationwide amendment to forest plans in the 118-year history of the Forest Service, where local rangers typically have the final word on how to balance forests’ role in watershed, wildlife and recreation with the agency’s mandate to maintain a “sustained yield” of timber.
“Old-growth forests are a vital part of our ecosystems and a special cultural resource,” Vilsack said in a statement accompanying the notice. “This clear direction will help our old-growth forests thrive across our shared landscape.”
But initial responses from both environmentalists and the logging industry suggest that the plan does not resolve the conflict between the Forest Service’s traditional role of administering the “products and services” of public lands—especially timber—and the challenges the agency now faces due to climate change. National Forests hold most of the nation’s mature and old-growth trees, and therefore, its greatest stores of forest carbon, but that resource is under growing pressure from wildfire, insects, disease and other impacts of warming.
Views could not be more polarized on how the National Forests should be managed in light of the growing risks.
National and local environmental advocates have been urging the Biden administration to adopt a new policy emphasizing preservation in National Forests, treating them as a strategic reserve of carbon. Although they praised the old-growth proposal as an “historic” step, they want to see protection extended to “mature” forests, those dominated by trees roughly 80 to 150 years old, which are a far larger portion of the National Forests. As old-growth trees are lost, which can happen rapidly due to megafires and other assaults, they argue that the Forest Service should be ensuring there are fully developed trees on the landscape to take their place...
The Biden administration’s new proposal seeks to take a middle ground, establishing protection for the oldest trees under its stewardship while allowing exceptions to reduce fuel hazards, protect public health and safety and other purposes. And the Forest Service is seeking public comment through Feb. 2 (Note: That's the official page for the proposed rule, but for some reason you can only submit comments through the forest service website - so do that here!) on the proposal as well as other steps needed to manage its lands to retain mature and old-growth forests over time, particularly in light of climate change.
If the Forest Service were to put in place nationwide protections for both mature and old-growth forests, it would close off most of the National Forests to logging. In an inventory concluded earlier this year in response to a Biden executive order, the Forest Service found that 24.7 million acres, or 17 percent, of its 144.3 million acres of forest are old-growth, while 68.1 million acres, or 47 percent, are mature."
-via Inside Climate News, December 20, 2023
-
Note: This proposed rule is current up for public comment! If you're in the US, you can go here to file an official comment telling the Biden administration how much you support this proposal - and that you think it should be extended to mature forests!
Official public comments really DO matter. You can leave a comment on this proposal here until February 2nd.
3K notes
·
View notes
Hi.
I'm going to break my very strict format for once because I need your help. For the past 9 years, the irl human behind this blog has been involved in the effort to save a museum from incompetent and money hungry executives.
The museum is filled with precious objects, telling the story of the history of technology, and how it relates to art and society.
Many of these are objects are large, but delicate and have been in place for over 30 years.
No one within the museum's community trusts the CEO, who was appointed by a hostile former government, and prefers renting out museum spaces for business functions over educating the public.
In a few days, the museum is set to close down for renovations. Yet none of the staff or volunteers have been given any clear details about these plans. All we know is displays which have inspired generations will be torn down, likely never to be restored.
We have a petition asking the new government to step in and stop the closure:
If you could sign this, you'd be doing the human behind this blog a massive favour.
607 notes
·
View notes
Sort of From the Horse's Mouth
For months people have been talking about how Hamas has long planned to infiltrate and influence Western countries that they not only disagree with fundamentally, but also want to violently overthrow. Hell, experts on Hamas and other terrorist groups have long documented this course of action prior to any of us speaking about. I have talked about this ad nauseum regarding the 93 Philadelphia Meeting tapes that the FBI submitted as evidence during the HLF trial in the 00s.
But that may not be enough for some people.
Edit: Thanks to @nerdypagan1 for pointing out that this is not their website.
However, I am going to keep this post up. Why? Because the materials contained on the website are very similar to materials we have seen in the past from Hamas on their actual website (I thought this was legit because the actual one is inaccessible at this time). Furthermore, the language, intent, and materials displayed below are in line with what is in their charter, has been expressed by their members and leadership, and experts on the group have stated and published on (e.g. Vidino and Levitt).
The likelihood is that someone took materials from their old website, telegram, and other sources and put this together.
Fig. 1. Hamas's four principles that guide their actions.
Fig. 2. The 5 stages of Hamas's activities in other countries.
Hamas tells us exactly who they are, what they're about, the actions they take, and their agenda. These two images are from their website (which is just their name .com). They openly admit that they mislead and misinform people around the world. They openly admit that they create organizations to convince people of their ideology and garner support. They openly admit that they want a theocratic fascist state and will kill to get it.
These are not "Freedom Fighters".
These are not "Liberators".
These are theocratic fascists who will do anything to get what they want.
If at this point you're still denying the intent of a theocratic fascist terrorist state and its openly stated goals, course of action, and intent then I don't know what to say to you. I would hope that even the terrorist group admitting to all of this would cause some self reflection. But somehow I think a good number of people are so invested in hating the West and being antisemitic that they will mental gymnastics away even the most blatant admissions.
137 notes
·
View notes
Nothing about the ICJ hearings or the US starting a war on Yemen but thank you Wikipedia dot org for telling me who won the World Darts Championship
140 notes
·
View notes