#scamdemic

[reality-detective]

Covid was planned years in advance... Right before President Trump's inauguration Obummer and Falsie verified it, but very few were paying attention.

It was in 2017 when I was telling everyone NOT to get the va¢¢ine after I saw Falsie say this. 🤔

[lionoftruths]

Vaccines have likely killed more people than all wars combined!

[commonsensecommentary]

“This year’s elections—and the stark choice they present for our nation’s future—are a tipping point that occurs perhaps only once in the history of any nation. How we vote in our local, state, and federal elections this year has certainly never been as important during my lifetime, and the direction we choose will reverberate through many, many decades to come.”

[ablogofcourage]

Just say no, It will save your life..

[theanarchistscookbook]

[blanketforlinus]

Make it make sense…because for the last 3 years it’s been bullshit!!!

[immaculatasknight]

Give them the fear of God

[kinialohaguy]

New Years Eve

Aloha kākou. It’s New Years Eve. This is the year in review. I’ve made the best of my posts throughout the year. Just the highlights and lowlights. The stuff that caught my attention throughout the year. The most momentous events were that Trump Won, and the Deep State tried to assassinate Trump. January: The year began with the 2024 Presidential campaign heating up. The Fake News Media was busy…

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

Dr. Fauci ADMITS Social Distancing Was NOT Based on Science, 'Sort Of Just Appeared'

Dr. Fauci ADMITS Social Distancing Was NOT Based on Science, ‘Sort Of Just Appeared’

Another day, another ‘conspiracy theory’ proved correct.

During a closed-door meeting with the Committee on Coronavirus Pandemic.

Dr. Fauci admitted that social distancing had no backing in science; instead, it “sort of just appeared.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the public face of the U.S. coronavirus pandemic response, told lawmakers this week that the social distancing recommendations forced on Americans “sort of just appeared” and were likely not based on scientific data.

Fauci, 83, made the startling revelation in a closed-door interview with the House Select Committee on Coronavirus Pandemic. He also testified that the lab leak hypothesis — which was often suppressed — was not a conspiracy theory and that the policies and mandates he promoted may increase vaccine hesitancy in the future, Committee Chair Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, wrote in a statement Wednesday.

Wenstrup’s committee has been investigating whether government officials at the time, including Fauci, worked to suppress questions about whether the pandemic was the result of a lab leak in Wuhan, China.

Republicans have accused those officials of pushing the natural origin theory in a bid to protect China.

“It never struck me that six feet was particularly sensical in the context of mitigation,” Dr. Ashish Jha, the dean of the Brown University School of Public Health who served as President Biden’s COVID response coordinator for 15 months, told the New York Times in March 2021.

“I wish the CDC would just come out and say this is not a major issue.”

The New York Post shares more:

Asked about a study in Massachusetts schools that found just three feet of distance between students resulted in “similar” COVID case rates, Fauci said the same month the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was “very carefully” reviewing the data and would “likely” update them.

If they were lying about the social distancing stuff, what else are they lying about?

When are they going to admit that the vaccine was NOT safe?

The evidence is clear, but they need to come clean." https://wltreport.com/2024/01/11/dr-fauci-admits-social-distancing-was-not-based/#:~:text=ADVERTISE%20WITH%20US,to%20come%20clean.

How about if Fauci just sort of DISAPPEARED

[mightyflamethrower]

Higher Incidence Of COVID-19 Found Among Consistent Mask-Wearers: Peer-Reviewed Study | ZeroHedge

People who wore protective masks were found to be more likely to contract COVID-19 infections than those who didn’t, according to a recent Norwegian study.

People who wore protective masks were found to be more likely to contract COVID-19 infections than those who didn’t, according to a recent Norwegian study.

The peer-reviewed study, published in the journal Epidemiology and Infection on Nov. 13, analyzed mask use among 3,209 individuals from Norway. Researchers followed them for 17 days, and then asked the participants about their use of masks. The team found that there was a higher incidence of testing positive for COVID-19 among people who used masks more frequently.

Among individuals who “never or almost never” wore masks, 8.6 percent tested positive. That rose to 15 percent among participants who “sometimes” used masks, and to 15.1 percent among those who “almost always or always” wore them.

Adjusting for factors such as vaccination status, the study determined that individuals who sometimes or often wore masks had a 33 percent higher incidence of COVID-19, compared to those who never or almost never wore masks. This jumped to 40 percent among people who almost always or always wore them.

However, adjusting for “differences in baseline risk over time,” the risk of wearing masks turned out to be “less pronounced,” with only a 4 percent higher incidence of infection among mask-wearers.

“The results contradict earlier randomized and non-randomized studies of the effectiveness of mask-wearing on the risk of infection,” the researchers wrote.

“Most of these studies reported that wearing a face mask reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection. Some observational studies have reported manyfold reductions while one community-based randomized trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in infection risk and one cluster randomized community trial found only a modest reduction.”

The researchers pointed out a major limitation of their study: Individuals who used masks may have done so to protect others from their own infection. This could explain the “positive association between risk of infection and mask usage.”

Behavioral differences and the fact that the survey was based on self-reporting could also contribute to bias, it stated.

There’s also a possibility that mask wearers felt safe while wearing masks and thus didn’t follow other regulations such as social distancing, which raised their risk of contracting COVID-19, the study said.

“Our findings suggest that wearing a face mask may be associated with an increased risk of infection. However, it is important to note that this association may be due to unobservable and non-adjustable differences between those wearing and not wearing a mask,” the researchers stated.

“Therefore, caution is imperative when interpreting the results from this and other observational studies on the relationship between mask-wearing and infection risk. Recommendations to wear face masks in the community are largely informed by low certainty evidence from observational studies.”

Researchers called for more trials and studies to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of wearing masks against transmission of respiratory pathogens.

The study was fully funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. It reported no conflicts of interest.

Masking Mandates

The new study comes at a time when some regions in North America are reinstating mask mandates amid a reported increase in COVID-19 cases.

At the beginning of November, many regions in the Bay Area issued masking rules in health care settings ahead of the respiratory disease season, when infections such as COVID-19, the flu, and respiratory syncytial virus are expected to spread.

In the state of California, San Francisco, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Marin, Contra Costa, Napa, Sonoma, and Solano issued masking mandates, with the rules remaining in effect until next March or April.

While in some places only staff and workers of a health care facility are required to wear masks, others require patients and visitors to wear masks as well.

Rosemary Hills School in Maryland announced in September that it distributed KN95 masks to students and teachers while mandating masking for at least 10 days after three students from a classroom tested positive for COVID-19.

A month earlier, school officials with the Kinterbish Junior High School in Cuba, Alabama, asked students, employees, and visitors to wear masks “due to the slow rise of COVID cases in the area.”

Seven hospitals in Canada reinstated mask mandates last month to “help prevent transmission of COVID-19.”

In British Columbia, Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry announced that health care workers, volunteers, and visitors would be required to wear “medical” masks in all public health care facilities starting on Oct. 3.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends wearing masks to counter COVID-19. “Masking is a critical public health tool and it is important to remember that any mask is better than no mask,” it said in an August 2021 update.

Certain states have already made it clear that mask mandates wouldn’t be allowed. In August, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said in an X post that there would be “NO mask mandates in Texas.”

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo highlighted the issue of the ineffectiveness of masking policies.

“What do you call re-imposing mask policies that have been proven ineffective or restarting lockdowns that are known to cause harm? You don’t call it sanity,“ he said in a post on X. "These terrible policies only work with your cooperation. How about refusing to participate.”

In an interview with the Brownstone Institute in February, Tom Jefferson, a senior associate tutor at the University of Oxford and lead author of the study, pointed out that there hasn’t been a “proper trial” of masks whereby a huge, randomized study was done to check their effectiveness. Instead, some experts overnight began to perpetuate a “fear-demic.”

[semotilus]

WHERE ARE ALL THE CREEK CHUBS?

[reality-detective]

All of this was Recorded from October 2019... Here's the smoking gun that proves these devils have had it all planned out from day 1, depopulation agenda in full effect.

The gov€rnments have pushed this Fake pand€mic so hard... 🤔

[lionoftruths]

Time to put vaccine killers in jail!

[matthewmlz]

Bill Gates and his sustainable development goal lackeys discuss "conspiracy theories" about Bill

(Quotes from Bill Gates) : "Most days during the pandemic 90% of the messages, millions of them that had anything to do with me were about how maybe vaccines were a plot, you know this whole tracking thing." "Why do I want to track you?" "Do I have the time to track all these people?"

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛

[ So riddle me this Bill: Where the hell do you get the figure "90%" if you haven't been tracking anything?🤔 And riddle me this: Why has Microsoft Windows been copying the hard drives and external storage of every user since 2015 (as per a sneaky clause in the tems of service agreement)? But rest easy MS Windows users, I'm certain that Bill would tell you this has nothing to do tracking. 😆🤣Lmfao Oh, and where would Bill find the "time to track all these people" as he put it? It's called algorithms, a staff of thousands, and virtually endless capital at your disposal. ]

[commonsensecommentary]

I wrote this 4 years ago, just when the still unbelievable horrors that the so-called Covid-19 “experts” were intent on inflicting on our nation had become clear to us all. Like many, many millions of Americans, I thought it was all utter madness. Whether those who destroyed our economic, emotional, and psychological health were liars, fools, traitors—or all three—we are still awaiting accountability and consequences for those who promoted mass hysteria and totalitarian tactics. We should not have to wait any longer for justice.

[blanketforlinus]

Keep the bullshit going Covid19 at this point is a fucking scam!!!  there is a treatment for it and it’s not that deadly anymore. Just like the flu pork chop your pandemic is over.. get over it liberal piece of shit.

y’all do NOT go out next week unless you have to and wear your best masks and tape the edges down bc it’s just not worth it