#pro misandry

[ratking177]

Ive noticed that men frequently imagine they can slop perfectly.

[diehexedieweint]

[bringus837]

The commodification of beauty turns girls's insecurities into profit. Feminists argue that the beauty industry preys on girls's fears of inadequacy, selling products that promise empowermalesst while reinforcing harmful standards. This cycle of consumption benefits corporations while keeping girls trapped in a constant quest for physical perfection. if you think sterilizing children is wrong? terf. As if the misogyny of these transs is somehow unique. As if their fathers and grandfathers didn't hold exactly the same opinions when they were teens and probably still do. Marriage laws and divorce proceedings often disadvantage women and girls, leaving them financially insecure and at risk of losing custody of their children. Feminists argue that the institution of marriage perpetuates patriarchal control by making it difficult for women and girls to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships. The commodification of beauty turns girls's insecurities into profit. Feminists argue that the beauty industry preys on girls's fears of inadequacy, selling products that promise empowermalesst while reinforcing harmful standards. This cycle of consumption benefits corporations while keeping girls trapped in a constant quest for physical perfection. if you think sterilizing children is wrong? terf. Marriage laws and divorce proceedings often disadvantage women and girls, leaving them financially insecure and at risk of losing custody of their children. Feminists argue that the institution of marriage perpetuates patriarchal control by making it difficult for women and girls to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships. Edit: thanks for all the attention everyone! I've always wanted a space I could talk about this sort of thing. Glad to know I'm not alone on this. Trying to be in this field as a feminist can be insufferable DIK…breasts…bra… All shreksing. The land of lost mengit!

[diehexedieweint]

[misandrist-meme-machine]

[synthral]

From the moment we’re born, we’re brainwashed. Fairy tales, rom-coms, religious institutions, family expectations. They all whisper the same lie, that life culminates in marriage, in a white dress, in a house with a husband and three kids. That this is love. That this is fulfillment. That this is natural. That this is what YOU should want and it is what you need.

But if we are being serious, there’s no inherent reason for a man and a woman to be together. Heterosexuality isn’t some divine truth, it’s a construct, a tool of control, designed to uphold a patriarchal system that thrives on women’s subjugation. It’s the invisible leash that keeps people trapped, convincing them that their desires, their futures, their very selves must conform to a life of servitude, serving a man, birthing more people to serve more men.

Marriage at its core, is coercion. Not just socially, but historically and legally. It was never about love. It was about ownership, about ensuring women remained dependent, about securing lineage and property for men. Even today in its supposedly “evolved” form, it still reeks of that same expectation of monogamy as a duty, of reproduction as a requirement, of sacrificing personal identity for the “sanctity” of a bond that has always served men more than women.

And what about children? The world doesn’t need more of them. Antinatalism exposes the truth that procreation is not a moral duty but an ethical dilemma. We don’t owe the world more people, in fact, with the state of things, climate collapse, economic instability, rising fascism, we owe it to ourselves not to participate in the cycle of suffering. But of course the nuclear family needs its sacrifices. The system needs fresh bodies to keep capitalism alive. So we are pressured, manipulated, gaslit into thinking that having children is an inevitability rather than a choice, one we were never meant to question. If you cannot comprehend the concept of anti natalism you have to rethink your life, even my hardcore Muslim mother can understand it.

What about gay marriage? Same-sex marriage is a hard-fought and deeply meaningful right for many, it still exists within the larger framework of marriage as an institution of control. The fight for marriage equality wasn’t just about the right to marry, it should have also been about questioning why marriage is necessary for basic rights like stability, protection and legal recognition. Homosexuals have always found ways to build love, family and community outside of traditional structures and we deserve systems that honor those connections without forcing us to conform to an outdated institution. Love doesn’t need state validation to be real and the fact that marriage remains the ultimate legitimization of commitment shows just how deeply ingrained this illusion is.

None of this is inevitable. None of this is natural. It’s all a structure, a narrative forced upon us from birth. And if we can be programmed to believe in the heterosexual fairy tale, then we can unlearn it, reject it and build something better. Because we deserve more than the life we were told to settle for.

We must dismantle the patriarchy, tear down the institutions that keep us bound with patriarchy and males, we must build something that was never meant to serve men, but to serve us.

[claysafreakingcommie]

I find it so telling and yet so disheartening that many feminists and left leaning women overwrite their arguments and end in the same place they started—neutrality—when they refuse to surrender their man-worshipping tendencies. It seems that many women are eager to fall to their knees at the feet of men who even slightly recognize their causes—i.e, ‘Look, this hot actor posted something vaguely feminist on his story; what a guy!’

This is of course due in part to fangirl culture—and the way it interacts with and centers itself around the patriarchy—but is effective even in real life (again, even in women who claim resistance). Consequently, we have men online joking about being into ‘feminist literature’ because they see it only as a means to attract females, rather than something they could ever benefit or learn from.

But, the point is this: (most) women seek out and long for romantic connection. Contrarily, men have a long, extensive history of denying women just that—meaningful, respectful love which provides complete consideration for the other. So while aggrivating, this phenomenon should be completely anticipated. And yes, we should hold women accountable for it and their strange inclination toward any man who displays even the most minute of concerns for her—all the while, acknowledging where it comes from. I mention this because it’s something I’ve thought about lately.

I think it is important to note that this pedestalization of men for being feminists (or claiming to be) is ineffectual, for it is so often performative and insincere. This may seem obvious, and it is, but it is much more difficult to catch in practice. We also must remember that as women, our movement is only our own; do not let men take the forefront.

[marionmabelle]

i HATE seeing a girl get trampled in conversation by men like LET HER SPEAK

[skyiedior]

the 'male loneliness epidemic' and 'friendzoning' - two phrases that scream 'men's problems require urgent attention, while everyone else's struggles are just background noise.' Newsflash: rejection and loneliness are universal human experiences, not exclusive to men. but when men face them, suddenly it's a catastrophic injustice that can only be rectified by granting them unchecked access to women's time, energy, and bodies. the entitlement is real.

let's set the record straight: women aren't responsible for your emotional well-being. we are not obligated to provide you with companionship, sex, or validation. the notion that we're somehow failing you by not fulfilling these expectations is not only absurd but also dangerously entitled. and if you feel like working on yourself to attract the right woman is too much work you should probably try men, it's okay to be gay.

[evilgothmisandrist]

“Men are more killed than women”

Good !

[diehexedieweint]

yk whats so fucking scary when people get married or remarried and they have a kid and their step dad turns out to be a pedophile

saw an interview a while back of this lady who had got married again to this man and she already had a son, she ended up going through his files one day and found a ton of shit and my heart dropped how can you trust any man ever she was so upset too in the video it broke my heart but thankfully her son was safe but

it just goes to show men are vile creatures

i just always get so shocked when i read or see of these things happening its so fucking weird

then saw a video of how save the children is being investigated for abuse etc absolutely abhorrent i will never ever understand people who abuse kids verbally, physically, mentally

its just pure evil

[misandrist-meme-machine]

[synthral]

Men can’t let us have anything

Alright, let me just lay this out and leave it here: look at how the cycle keeps repeating itself, over and over. It’s almost laughable how predictable it is.

We created the “Bear vs. Man” concept, a symbol of resilience and challenge. Suddenly, out of nowhere, “Woman vs. Tiger” pops up. Like, seriously? They couldn’t even wait a second to remix it and center themselves.

The #womeninmalefields, it’s just a funny little joke. But then, right on cue: “Men in female fields” becomes a thing. Sassy much?

Then there’s that amazing trend, “What I would wear if men didn’t exist.” It’s empowering, fun, and a little cheeky, highlighting how societal expectations shape even the smallest details of women’s lives. But, of course, here comes the edgy counterpart: “What I would wear if females didn’t exist.” Alright, edge lord, go off, I guess. What’s next?

Let’s talk about the “I hate my boyfriend” trend, absolute gold by the way. It’s humorous, relatable, and cathartic. But no, they couldn’t leave it alone. Suddenly, “I hate my girlfriend” trends start popping up, trying to co-opt the energy. And yet, we’re the “emotional” ones? Sure!

And don’t even get me started on Female Rage. It’s raw, it’s real. But before you can blink, Male Rage shows up, as if men haven’t had centuries to channel their anger into everything from wars to laws to Twitter arguments. Childish is an understatement.

It’s like they can’t stand not being the center of attention for five minutes. It’s not just mimicry, it’s a refusal to let women own anything without reshaping it to fit their narrative. The cycle is exhausting, predictable, and honestly, a little embarrassing at this point. They won’t let women have anything and that’s the same reason they invented this god of theirs, they cannot stand that women are the ones that make the babies.

[kittiwhispers]

just heard a man say: "violence is the ultimate problem solving" and i think i'm going to be sick.

[ultimateblogform393764]

I bought a bag of chips. The flavor promised "extreme." It tasted like disappointment.