#no heterosexual explanation for this idk
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
shadow is awkward as fuck and has no game part 100
video for quality
#no heterosexual explanation for this idk#sonadow#sth#gif#saltcat posting#is it gay to stare at eachother for more than 7 seconds or does it not count if your sonic the hedgehog?
163 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hell, man, we were hummin'!
#Riverdale#riverdaleedit#riverdalecentral#teendramaedit#Archie Andrews#Julian Blossom#archieandrewsedit#julianblossomedit#julian x archie#arsenicpandacreates#Riverdale gifs#Riverdale season 7#it's important to me that you notice how Julian looks at Archie's crotch in gif 4#I defy you to find a heterosexual explanation for this#time to invent a ship name let's see...#jularchie#or maybe#julandrews#idk someone send help on this one
826 notes
·
View notes
Text
ok but hear me out. their overworld conversation was GAY gay
#sugars sweet treats#cookie run#cookie run kingdom#royal margarine cookie#wildberry cookie#royalberry#idk if they have a ship name but thats what im using#im kind of obsessed with their dynamic sorry#literally 0 heterosexual explanation for their interaction in the overworld i s2g
41 notes
·
View notes
Text
I just don't think most of y'all can actually read facial expressions. The way two characters (or even celebrities) "look" at each other is always cited as proof of one thing or another and at least 80% of the time the pictures tell a completely different story
#80% might be too generous but sometimes....#anyway#fandom wank#sorry lmao ive been getting tired of those#'theres no heterosexual explanation for this look'#sometimes thats just regular friendship fondness!#sometimes thats not even a positive emotion on their face and idk what yall are seeing 😭😭#chatter
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
Apparently Nintendo did an Oopsie with the new Off the Hook song, which by the way, is a great song, but what's more important is-
LOOK AT ME
IN THE EYES,
AND CONVINCE ME
THAT THEY'RE NOT A COUPLE.
SPOILER ALERT:
YOU CAN'T.
#piko rambles#splatoon#pearl houzuki#marina ida#off the hook#pearlina#splatoon spoilers#<--- Maybe???? idk#THERE IS NO HETEROSEXUAL EXPLANATION FOR THIS#I LOVE THEM DO YOU UNDERSTAND#Leaking the new Off the Hook song and their performance was probably the best thing Nintendo did in a while LMAOOOOOO#You can't escape the Pearlina fans Nintendo. WE ARE ALWAYS ONE STEP CLOSER. 😈#I had no clue about this until JUST now XDDD#They also did a new version of Color Pulse which is also really good
99 notes
·
View notes
Text
i still yearn to bear my fangs at you again, as i knew how
#bnha#togachako#toga himiko#himiko toga#uraraka ochako#ochako uraraka#lychee's trash art#idk how to paint but it's whatever amiright i made an attempt#never drawn toga until now but binge reading all 430 chapters in#about 7 days;;; well that altered my brain chemistry#(hadn't caught up since plf until now lmfao)#there's not really any heterosexual explanation for togachako#i was inspired by this one image i saw on the internet while scrolling#i lost it sorry my bad do you like frogs?#i think i'm going to write bakukami now#praying that there are no egregious mistakes i'll catch in the morning#mha#boku no hero academia#my hero academia
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
Never going to stop laughing at L just being like: "OBVIOUSLY I'M PISSED OFF AND DEPRESSED BECAUSE IT'S NOT SPECIFICALLY YOU WHO WAS KIRA, NOT JUST BECAUSE MY THEORY ABOUT IT WAS WRONG" and him seeing that as an entirely reasonable and not at all unhinged or questionable thing to feel and say 😭
#they needed to be locked in a room talking for much longer i think#the task force and watari should have forcibly removed misa and done some couple's therapy over the phone for them#until they finally sorted out their shit#like idk there is just no heterosexual explanation for it#l lawliet#light yagami#lawlight#mangacap#p
438 notes
·
View notes
Text
Shout out to both Jonathan and Joseph for both being bisexual and polyamorous and being into blond bitches
#like. Jonathan and Erina are obviously in love. canon all that good stuff#then part two opens up with Joseph literally being like: Uncle Speedwagon has never married and literally devoted his life to our family#not very heterosexual if you ask me#so it’s basically canon that Speeds at least had a crush on Jonathan#then again: Joseph and Suzy are canon#and honestly just watch the OP there is NO heterosexual explanation for that#Joseph gets the added benefits of specifically being into Italian blond bitches#jjba#jojo bizarre adventure#jojo's bizarre adventure#jonathan joestar#joseph joestar#erina joestar#robert eo speedwagon#suzie q#caesar zeppeli#idk their ship name
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
I have thoughts about Able and Tron
Okay so. Able *cannot* be from the first grid, the ENCOM grid, right? Like, idk he just can’t be. Why would Flynn port over some random mechanic.
And yet. In the second episode Able reveals he has a FIRST GEN LIGHT BIKE. Y’KNOW. FROM THE ENCOM GRID.
(Interesting to note is that Mara distinctly says it’s “one of a kind” when she observes it)
And then notice how Tron *never* rides a first gen light bike in the show, even in the flashbacks, despite being the most likely to own one considering he comes from the ENCOM grid.
DID. DID TRON GIVE ABLE HIS “one of a kind” LIGHT BIKE??
Take into account that Able really likes that bike. Sure it’s an old thing so ofc he would, but still. Able calls it his favorite bike.
Remember that Tron isn’t one to show his affection through words, rather in actions (Beck has to be on the brink of losing his memories for him to finally call him his friend).
Able also has a Bit. Again, something from the ENCOM grid, and while it seems the Bit belongs to everyone in the garage, it’s often seen in Able’s office. It even has its own stand.
Where does he get these things? Is it another thing Tron gave him? There’s no currency to speak of in the Grid (I can only imagine the black market for stolen disks is to get in favor with the Occupation by providing the disks of wanted programs. Energy is simply a resource, not a currency), he couldn’t have ‘bought’ it anywhere.
Tangentially related, I know that people have noticed the Yori suit Easter egg, but I haven’t seen many think about the implications of Able having it in his office.
Why would he? Tron has enough space at his place to store the suit if he wanted to. Why put it in Able’s office? Does it imply Able had some sort of relationship with Yori? Does it imply he’s thinking about her at the start of episode 12? Why does Tron keep giving Able things and why does he trust him to such an immense degree to keep the suit of his former lover in his office? That seems like a huge thing to trust Able to keep, especially considering how Able and Tron’s relationship is shown to be strained at best.
Pair this with the fact they’re often portrayed as a bickering couple talking about a program who fills a surrogate son role, and you got me smelling queerness imma be real.
Either this is a kinda unusual way to imply a history between Tron and Able before the reveal, or they’re queer as fuck (maybe even both).
#I’m sure it’s the former of the two options I mentioned at the end#but idk man#maybe a lot of people already made the connection between the stuff Able owns and his relationship with Tron but idc I *just* figured it ou#t#queer readings#am I crazy for looking too hard into this idk#am I jumping to conclusions? maybe. maybe there’s a completely heterosexual explanation for this but that’s not gonna stop me#tron#tron uprising#i ramble#tron able
70 notes
·
View notes
Text
EVERYBODY!! look at these paintings by Vsevolod Maksymovyc
👀👀👀
like hi hello CAN I HELP YOU?
#i'm doing art history research and stumbled upon him#there is no heterosexual explanation for this#he gets it#more importantly: he gets me#i can't find a lot about him that's not in russian#but apparently he tried reflecting an essence of a fertility cult????#firefox webpage#translator isn't perfect so idk
55 notes
·
View notes
Text
so how do y'all feel about quiobi???
#idk am i the only one who thinks that qui gon touching obi wan's face right before he dies has zero heterosexual explanation????#txt
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
When it comes to Supernatural I find myself in wincest/wincest adjacent spaces quite a bit and like awesome, love it
But sometimes I see posts talking about how incestuous and codependent sam and dean are and they're not talking sbout any of the actual codependent shit but like...looking at each fondly. Spending time together, even when they're not forced to. Acknowledging the other as an important part of their life. And it's used as an example of things that normal siblings categorically Do Not do.
Babe the fuck kind of environment did you grow up in?
#ramblings#supernatural#wincest adjacent#gencest#wincest#i know I KNOW that its kind of part of shipping to use the tiniest hint to be like omgggg they're in love#i mean hell idk if anyone actually thinks like this irl without the shipping goggles on#it's just a personal gripe#along the same lines as “there's no heterosexual explanation for this!” also being a thing that bugs me
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
There’s no other explanation but Naruto was in love with Sasuke.
#how can you read the manga and not conclude that#random thoughts I have in the middle of the day#there’s no heterosexual explanation#remember when Sai thought Naruto was doing all that because of his love for Sakura#like yes love was making him do all these crazy things#but it wasn’t his love for Sakura#idk man Naruto was in love with Sasuke
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Depends on how you define rizz. Chance/Ability to bag people? Probably Victoria above Taylor. Number of people rizzed? Textually, Victoria probably goes between Blake and Taylor. If you count subtext like Lisa and Rachel? She goes after Taylor.
wildbow protagonist rizz tier list
1.) Sylvester Lambsbridge
2.) Blake Thorburn (Not only did he have god awful karma but he also was literally part tree and he STILL pulled. Fucking crazy)
3.) Taylor Hebert ("I can fix her." - They did NOT fix her.)
Haven't read ward or pale so I'm not sure where they fall, but even then ion think Victoria or any of the trio go above these rankings. I just don't think they got it in them to go higher idk
#yeah yeah 'no heterosexual explanation'#but if you just count the people who openly admitted to liking Taylor#it's three#technically it's also three for Vicky#but she wins the aforementioned 'chances of pulling someone'#since she was like poster hero girl#whereas Taylor was an awkward mess#Although Taylor was also creepy cool villain#And Vicky was cop brutality and weirdo obsessed with cape stats#but I would still ultimately rank Vicky higher since that's probably more widely appealing#you might be able to subtextually count Lisa and Ashley for Vicky#(idk I haven't read all of it yet)#but so far they seem much more subtextual than taylor's subtextual rizz was#(Vicky hasnt kissed either of them or had one of them tell the audience they aren't gay or had deeply emotional connections no one else has
89 notes
·
View notes
Text
i dont care what canon tries to tell me and i don't care for how other people are trying to analyze 8x06
like I'm not buying into the idea that buck "idolised" his boyfriend and "didn't really know him" if you want me to accept buck has been dating a man for half a year and took no time to think about his own or tommy's identity and labels (yes even if he was to reach the dreaded “i don't care about labels” conclusion because ryan murphy productions are apparently allergic to the word bisexual) we're not going to get along idk
or whatever bullshit it is that buck couldn't say i love you but "rushed" to ask tommy to move in (and the idea that he was "inconsiderate" about tommy's house, sorry but that's literally all fanon, we don't know shit about Tommy's living situation other than that he has a big ass garage apparently. i promise you the writers were throwing "masculine" hobbies at tommy and trying to find common ground between him and eddie, you (we) have spent 6+ months thinking about tommy's house, the writers have spent 0 of that time on it) or that buck wouldn't be understanding of a closeted repressed gay man entering a heterosexual relationship with a woman as either an act of self preservation or succumbing to societal pressures. Michael Grant has been part of the canon storyline since s1. give me a fucking break.
like maybe I'm the only person who doesn't see this narrative as consistent with buck's character especially with the development it has gone through in s6 and s7 (and obviously i was foolish in hoping that canon would follow through with the development and not just uno reverse everything they've spent time setting up in previous seasons).
i feel like i have talked about the tommy side of things and the bottom line is that no matter how much meta we read and write the writing as it was presented to us in the episode is that tommy believes that because he is the first man that buck has dated he won't be his last and that their relationship is doomed because buck thinks everything is "new and exciting" and is essentially treating tommy as a shiny new toy. the only reasonable, plausible explanation for the things tommy said is that he's been in buck's position before and hurt someone he dated when he first came out. but again the writers aren't thinking about it as much as we are.
and while these lines are extremely biphobic, at least you can say it was the writing that was biphobic (just like the misogynist writing in the restaurant scene). you can say tommy was insecure (because he obviously is) so at least it doesn't butcher tommy's character.
buck, on the other hand? i don't know what happened to buck. we know that buck is tuned in to his loved ones’ struggles even when they don't voice them, he's shown this time and time again. he's perceptive and compassionate and non judgemental. buck cares so fucking much. nevermind the inconsistencies in the storytelling from 7x05 to 8x06. ignoring those. but this isn't the character we've seen for 8 seasons.
#send post#evan buckley#tommy kinard#bucktommy#idk im on the “windrush line” so this is kinda rushed. brain dump. i got annoyed.
126 notes
·
View notes
Note
What do you think gay men are attracted to in men that they can’t be attracted to in women?
It can’t be anything about femininity or masculinity obviously. That’s both sexist, and cultural so can’t be what drives men-only attraction.
It can’t be anything about stated identity because someone could lie just as easily as they could tell the truth in such a statement, and it makes no sense because homosexuality and heterosexuality exists in other species with no stated identities. It’s not like other animals without gender are all pan.
Saying idk it’s the vibes or some indescribable trait men have that women can’t but “I can’t explain” is a nonanswer.
Soooooooo what is it? Or do you think any sexuality but bi/pan is just cultural performance or an identity rather than an inborn orientation?
- [ ]
I think trying to find one perfect answer that applies universally is the critical mistake here. I mean, I am a gay man. I say this because as of yet, that's the clearest answer I have for myself personally; maybe there's a possibility I experience attraction to a woman at some point (maybe I already have???), but I don't really have clarity on that right now, and it doesn't serve me to shape or explain my identity around "maybe"s.
Trying to pinpoint exactly what it is that attracts me to other men, specifically, is also like... not that useful. I used to find myself really attracted to feminine men specifically; not feminine women, not masculine women, not masculine men, not androgynous anyone, but feminine men. Specifically, men who were feminine in a very particular, long-hair-certain-attitude kind of way.
Recently, I have found myself appreciating, more and more, a certain kind of masculine body type and gay masculinity that I was never really interested in before. I find it incredibly hot. A lot of that coincides with things I appreciate about my partner, too, and things I find myself appreciating more about my partner as time goes on- as well as things my partner expresses appreciation for about me!
And I haven't even touched on attraction to nonbinary folks here because, like, it's a massive spectrum. "Nonbinary" means something different for every individual nonbinary person. To my mind, of course there's a possibility I experience attraction to a nonbinary person; how they identity, present, and what attracts me to them are all even more impossible to know for certain than the "maybe"s and the "why"s around my attraction (or lack thereof) to men and women.
My relationship to my own orientation was vastly different pre-testosterone versus post-testosterone, too. I was much more reserved and uncomfortable with relationships and attraction before I started T, and the only dynamic I ever felt was even a little bit tolerable was one where I was the "masculine woman" in a lesbian relationship. I didn't realize until very shortly after starting T that, actually, I like men. A lot. I felt comfortable with my body and my masculinity in a way I never had been before, and I felt comfortable in relationships with men; I no longer felt like I was The Woman By Default in contrast.
And that's all just me! This is my personal, specific, individual relationship to attraction, and how gender- both others' and my own- factors into my relationship with orientation.
I don't think it's necessarily inborn, or completely unchanging for everyone. I also don't think the same factors apply for everyone. I think a lot of different things can be true for different people, all at once, and it's not really useful to try to pinpoint a specific, universal explanation for orientation.
Everyone has a different relationship to orientation and gender; everyone will be influenced differently by cultural factors, by their own ways of processing and understanding the world around them, by the ways different aspects of their culture, identity, personality, and inborn traits and how they all interact with one another, and sure, maybe even by biological factors and tendencies.
Trying to solve this puzzle for the entire world of diverse human beings isn't going to make it any easier to understand yourself. Focus on what this all means for you, personally, and accept that you will never, can never, fully and perfectly understand anyone else's internal world and workings. Things get a lot easier when you can let go of that & just appreciate the diversity of human experiences, y'know?
#advice#sorry if this isn't the answer you wanted anon#and honestly I recommend digging into some academic works around queer and gender studies#try some judith butler if you need a starting point#but like. people have been asking this question for some time & you will find so much more value in the answers of people whose whole lives#are dedicated to exploring the possibilities and diversity of experiences#and putting that in larger contexts with help and collaboration from a whole world of people doing similar work
452 notes
·
View notes