#metafísica de la guerra | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

itsgerges · 1 month ago

Text

Best Regards

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis

Basic Critic Against The Physics Book

It's the main problem I found in the solar system Geometry- the Physicist sees something but the designer sees another thing– these are two different visions for the same solar system- that answers (Why Are So Many Theories In The Physics Book Just Imaginary Ideas And Not Facts?)– let's discuss this problem

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes that there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the mass (for example) as wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and for that the physicist searched for this (unit) because it's the (unit) by which the wall is building (the mass is building)– this is the physicist thinking direction- he believed there's a small unit by which the great building is built

For that the physicist searched and found the particle and then the particle is divided into Molecules then the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- the unit by which the building is built – or the unit by which the mass is built – for that the physicist divides (any thing) to see its contents till reach to the unit which can be used as the building unit.

The Designer Vision

The designer aims to create integration- as the marriage – male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child

INTEGRATION this is the word inside the designer Mind

No building unit- the marriage answers- because in marriage both (male and female) are required and no one of them better than the other – both work together and give equal effects on the same one process and give together one result- I explain the idea by the marriage because it's easy to understand- I want to put the word (Integration) as the basic concept in the designer mind

And

I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method

While the physicist divides the elements one after one (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which he considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process

Let's return to the marriage- the marriage requires two players (male and female)- they have different bodies and the process give birth for children- Suppose we remove one player what would happen? (where can we find a woman pregnant by herself?)

I want to say- the division from (matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) destroys the general geometrical design which uses the integration process- let's give other examples

Example No. (1)

Einstein told us (He can't find slightest meaning for the word SPACE) by that he can't define (what's the space) and also he found the space has no mechanical features because no definition causes these features – this is the physicist vision - Let's see the designer vision

Planet moves and its motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and where's the energy? the planet can't store its motion energy inside its body because this energy would raise the planet temperature and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- so- where's the planet motion energy? logically we suppose that- the energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- the planet moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space (as the fish swims in the sea and its motion creates waves in the sea water) similar to that the planet motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space- by that we can define the space and conclude the space nature and features- simply we conclude the space has mechanical features because the energy is stored in the space as moving waves- the gravitational waves prove the space has motion- why we can solve the question which Einstein couldn't solve? Because he supposed the planet is independent from the space- the integration concept is not known by him

Notice

The waves are produced by the planet motion energy are the gravitational waves, the paper first hypothesis proves these waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field also the hypothesis proves the Sun doesn't produce a gravitational field.

Example No. (2)

The scientists stated (The Sun Rays Are Created By The Sun Nuclear Fusion Process)

Why?

Because they think the sun is independent from the planets and each planet is independent from the other– the harmony motion can not prove all players are created from one unified source (one energy) - the integration is not seeing here

But

We can reach to the facts simply- because- the planet moves and produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy is stored in the space in moving waves-

The simple idea tells (the energy can NOT be stored in the space forever) this stored energy must be used- here we see how the sun rays is created- clearly- the Sun Is NOT Doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays- why? because the solar system is very rich in the motion energy and massive motion energy is stored in the space logically this stored energy must be used by some method- based on that- I conclude – the sun rays are produced from this stored energy regardless the production mechanism (means even if I don't know how the sun rays is produced by this energy) I still can confirm that the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies which are stored in the solar system space as moving waves-

I wish I explain the idea clearly -I can discover the space nature and features by planet motion analysis – why? because of the integration- they do one unified job together and each player can be defined by the analysis for the other player.

Notice The paper second hypothesis tells (the sun rays is created by the gravitational waves motions and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies, means the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies total) the hypothesis is discussed and proved in the paper abstract and discussion

The Concept Problem -the problem is the eyes – the physicist eyes should see the integration while the integration is growing– let's give example to see this problem

The Earth and its moon move together and they create integrated motion- that shows unified motion by the two planets – but this integration is growing by Venus Motion effect on both planets and by that we have greater integration contains (The Earth- The Moon – Venus) – But Mars also has effect on the three planets – that shows greater integration contains the four planets and of Course Mercury has effect on all and that created greater integration contains the inner planets –

The integration is growing till contain all planets and the Sun together – why?- because it's One Unified Energy behind all players

It needs one genius can understand all these motions and their effects on each other to create one unified motion and one unified effect

The physicist needs very wide eyes can see the great integrated system and all small integrated systems inside it– (something like a great chess board which have hundreds of pieces- if the eyes can see all pieces motions and their effects)

The Concept Use Difficulty-

Why is it hard to discover the integration in the solar system?

Because the geometrical rules are not known and by that we don't know what effect is produced by this integration – the paper hypotheses provide examples to explain that.

PAPER FIRST HYPOTHESIS

Paper first hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (Moreover the sun is not producing a gravitational field) and

The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and (From Uranus to Jupiter) and (from Venus to Mars) –

The gravitational waves reflection causes changes in the planets data- and these changes are repeated with each reflection- means- these changes are found by rules because it's repeated with each reflection clearly- that shows the planets use similar behaviors to create their data which proves one reason causes to create all this data

Also- the wave energy reflection causes to square the wave velocity – the velocity square is the most important feature of the energy reflection because it enables the waves to move by speed of light- that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light in the solar system- the motion by speed of light is produced only by the wave energy reflection (and without the reflection this motion can't be done)

Paper 1st hypothesis (The objective of the hypothesis)

I prove that the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and these waves are reflected in the solar system three time and the reflection of the wave energy causes to square the wave velocity (the velocity squaring is the important feature I prove in the paper because the light beam is reflected but its speed is NOT squared and that means the wave velocity squaring is feature of the space) and it's very important to prove the wave velocity is squared by the reflection because this process enables the waves to move by speed of light and that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light – as this new article states

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- here I explain how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light (please note the article still believes the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field – I refuse this idea – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies but the article states that the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam and I accept this idea and I explain and prove how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light)

Paper 1st hypothesis Proof (The Proving Method)

I compare between the planets data in the three reflections of the wave- I put the planets data in comparison to each other for each reflection to prove the planets use similar behaviors to define their data and this similar behavior proves one force (or one reason) is found behind- and this one reason is the wave energy reflection which causes to create all this data –

The wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design (A Summary)

The reflections cause defined changes in the planets data – and

The most important change is (the wave velocity square) – and this velocity squaring is very important because it enable the gravitational waves to move by speed of light – the motion by speed of light is very effective on the solar system design because it defines the planets distribution between the sun and Pluto– this fact is explained in point no. (**)

Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation and Proof Discussion

The explanation is discussed in two parts

1ST PART

I- Preface

II- The Comparison

III- The explanation of the wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design

2nd PART

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Detailed Discussion

(Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation) 1ST PART

I- Preface

(1)

Planet Motion Energy Analysis

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

(2)

These Waves Are The Gravitational Waves (My Hypothesis)

Mans- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies- these waves are the gravitational waves- it's my paper 1st hypothesis- the gravitational waves are not produced by the gravitational field (moreover the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field) instead the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies

AND

The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND

In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

The 1st Conclusion

The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space

Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves -

Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why?

The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

(3)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-

Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.

(iii)

The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-

(iv)

The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)

Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The 2nd Conclusion

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

(4)

The Energy Reflection Trajectory

Let's remember what we know till now

(a)

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy creates waves in the space and each wave moves by its planet velocity- these waves move toward Pluto (perpendicular on the revolution direction) and in Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by velocity = the planets velocities total = 205.8 km/s

Means- while the planets revolve around the sun in their orbits by their velocities- there's one unified wave revolves around the sun moving by 205.8 km/s and this unified wave revolves around The Sun In Pluto Orbit-this unified wave is The Gravitational Wave

Now- this unified wave is reflected from Pluto to Venus orbit- Means- the unified wave is reflected and sent from Pluto to Neptune to the next planets till reach Venus

The unified wave is reflected three times in the solar system

(from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and

(from Uranus and Jupiter) and

(from Venus to Mars)

With each reflection of the wave defined changes are done for the planets data

But let's refer to the general design behind these three reflections in following

(b)

We remember this new article

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam-

My hypothesis tells (the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity)

Let's put the ideas beside one another to see the general design

The gravitational waves can move by speed of light AND can produce a light beam – How?? if the motion is done by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) how can this motion produce a light beam? Because the light beam is produced from the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) – here we see the energy reflection effect- the wave moves by speed of light and when this wave is reflected its velocity is squared and produced the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) from which the light beam is created-

Means

The machine needs one reflection to change the speed from (speed of light C=30000 km/s to the value C^2 =squared speed of light) and by that the light beam is created

Now – let's ask -

How can the wave moves by speed of light?

We remember- the one unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves in Pluto orbit with velocity 205.8 km/s – how can this gravitational wave moves by speed of light?

By another reflection of energy – let's see that in following

300000 km/s = (205.8 km/s)^2 x 7.1

This equation tells

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities

(205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s

Means the gravitational wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s

BUT

If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1

Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1

BUT

The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect

The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light)

That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

Here we see clearly that

The machine needs one energy reflection only to accelerate the wave velocity from 205.8 km/s to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

And

The machine needs one more reflection only to change the wave speed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2 =squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Shortly -the machine needs only two reflections of energy to produce the light beam from the gravitational waves motions

Now – let's ask– Why Are There Three Reflections Of Energy In The Solar System? If The Machine Needs Just Two Reflections Why The Machine Uses Three Reflections?

Because

Pluto reflected the energy toward Neptune but Neptune didn't send the energy to Uranus instead Neptune captured and energy and used it for its orbit and by that the energy be stored in Neptune orbit can didn't reach to Uranus- this effect of Neptune motion caused great problem in the solar system- in that time Saturn was not created yet- and Uranus couldn't release the energy from Neptune orbit for that Uranus made an interaction with the Earth and by this interaction Saturn is created for that Saturn is a planet its father is Uranus and its mother is the Earth- Saturn move depends on Uranus and the Earth motions- and -Saturn released the energy from Neptune orbit – for that – the first reflection is from Neptune to Saturn – that's why I call this reflection (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) because it’s the energy of Pluto but it's captured in Neptune orbit and Saturn released the energy from Neptune orbit (The 1st reflection of energy) and Saturn sent the energy immediately to Uranus and Uranus reflected the energy to Jupiter (The 2nd reflection of energy) and Jupiter sent the energy to Venus and Venus reflected the energy to Mars (The 3rd reflection of energy)- Now – we understand that – Neptune effect caused to reflect the energy one more time – if Neptune is not found in the solar system the energy would be reflected two times only and they will be enough to produce the light beam

(c)

Please note- the two reflections in the outer planets are done to produce a result of one reflection only and for that the two reflections are complementary one another as we will discuss- and – the solar system general design depends only on two reflections- means- spite they are three reflections and we will see in details each reflection effect but the solar system general design depends on two reflections because the third reflection is found because of Neptune negative effect- means- it's found only for repair the negative effect and if Neptune negative effect is removed this 3rd reflection will be removed for that the design depends on 2 reflections only- discussed later

(5)

Planet Definition

(A)

The physics book defines the planet as (Planet is solid body created independently from the space and the other planets)–if so- how can the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data??

My definition for the planet is

Planet is a geometrical point carried on the moving energy (or Planet is a geometrical point found on a light beam) – let's explain this definition in following

The matter and space both are created from the same one energy- means

The planets matters and their distances both are created from the same one energy- the matter and space move depending on the motion of this energy from which they are created-means- the matter isn't moving by the mass gravity – Newton is wrong- the matter moves by the motion of the energy from which the matter is created-

Based on this idea

The space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a geometrical frame (a distinguished form from the space) and moves by a different velocity from the space motion- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish form from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- this explanation shows how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters how is this whirlpool created? and why does its diameter equal = 2 meters? The diameter is created as a result for the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also-

Let's give another example

The energy motion is similar to the blood motion in a creature body- suppose- we examine now a liver of human - the blood motion causes this liver to work perfectly but if the blood motion is changed that would cause changes for the liver cells and job – suppose the blood have some poison the liver will be dead- suppose the pressure is raised- I want to say- the liver is a piece of body (matter) but it depends on the blood motion and this blood motion defines this liver dimensions and data-

Shortly–the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle may be so strong as a rock but it depends on the blood motion (similar to that the matter is found depending on the motion of energy from which this matter is created)

That explains how the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data- still the planet is a solid body and the wave is a wave- the wave can be reflected but the solid body can NOT be reflected spite of that the planets data is reflected one another because the reflected waves have effects on the moving energy by which this planet (solid body) is created-

(B)

We should see the depth of this new definition-

The definition tells us

The matter (planet) is created by energy and the matter moves with this energy- means- this energy is the mother of this matter- this energy created the matter and caused this matter motion-BUT- this definition tells- the matter motion is defined before the matter creation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- How can that be possible? Because –

The energy is found alone in motion (the sea water was in motion) and the energy created the matter and this matter dimensions and data is defined based on the energy motion features (as discussed before- the whirlpool "vortex" is created with diameter 2 meters and this diameter is defined by the water motion features "velocity- pressure- angle- amount …etc") by that the matter dimensions are defined by the mother energy motion features - AND after the matter creation, the matter moves with the mother energy- by that- the created matter moves the same motion based on which this matter dimensions and data is defined- that explains how the planet motion is defined before the planet creation-

This fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because it proves strongly that the planet diameter is created based on its velocity- means- the equation proves – for example – Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s and Neptune velocity is defined before Neptune diameter- let's remember this equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

The Equation Concept (A Summary)

Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result

The designer created the planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved-

(C)

The previous explanation helps us to see how the planet is created- also we remember Kepler rule (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity)

The orbit is created at first and the orbit defines the motion velocity and the planet diameter is created based on this velocity –means- the space is created before the matter creation- Shortly- The planet orbit is created (from the mother energy) before this planet creation and the planet is created later (by this energy motion features) and the planet data is defined based on this motion features and the planet moves after Creation with this mother energy motion- and– in case any planet after creation changes its orbit the planet motion data be changed but its creation data is saved- we should note that the space must be created based on a geometrical design-means- the solar system space (all orbits) is designed based on one geometrical design before any planet creation

(D)

The planet is a geometrical point on the mother energy and moves with it –Or

The planet is a geometrical point on the same light beam and moves with it

That tells

The solar planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam and move with this light beam motion

By that- the planets are similar to carriages in one train –and the light beam (the mother energy) is the engine of this train- the light moves and causes all planets motions (as the sea water moves and causes all ships motions)

Here we conclude that the planets motions are similar to the chess board motions because it depends on geometrical rules in all details- that's why the analysis is so useful because it can show the geometrical design found by the planets motions integration.

(E)

The planet definition answers the question

If The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Why This Reflection Have Effects On The Planets Data?

Because the waves reflection causes to define the energy motion direction and by that the planets data is changed and effected by the moving energy through these planets-

The effects on the planets data is very useful because it proves the reflection is a fact as we discussed later

II- The Comparison

The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system three times

(From Neptune to Saturn) This Is The First Reflection

(From Uranus to Jupiter) This Is The Second Reflection

(From Venus to Mars) This Is The Third Reflection

Here we compare among the data of these planets- the comparison provides 7 groups of data in each group we compare the planets data because I want to prove that the planets use similar behaviors to produce their data – means- this all data is created based on geometrical rules which proves that there's one reason caused to create all this data and this reason is the gravitational waves reflection- In the comparison I start by Venus reflection (the 3rd one) then Uranus reflection (the 2nd one) and Neptune reflection (1st one) because Venus is very simple data and can be understood easily-

The Data Changes

��The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in the planets data let's refer to these changes in following

What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.

What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection

The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.

The energy direction is changed by the reflection

The players of the rates of time are reflected also –

Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have discussed- the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn– and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets -

These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the comparison of the data and the detailed analysis for the wave reflection.

Group Data No (I)

(1)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

And

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

(2)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

(3)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–

BUT

The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And

(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

Discussion

(1)

The data shows the following

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference

This data proved my planet definition (the planets are geometrical points carried by the same one energy- or- the planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam- and the planets move with this light beam motion- and the planets are created depending on each other and No planet is independent from the others in its creation and motion) – means- the planets are similar to whirlpools (vortex) found on the sea water page- we can imagine many whirlpools (vortex) are found on the same one sea and they are near to each other- this picture is very similar to the planets nature- that explains how the reflection of energy for one time can define the orbital periods for three planets (or 4 planets) together-

Here we imagine there are 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and then one strong wave of water passed through these 4 whirlpools (vortex), and this water wave motion causes effects on the 4 whirlpools-

This information is so important because one motion only (one wave reflection) can cause to define three or four planets data that proves strongly the planets Can NOT be independent neither in Creation Nor in motion- the planets are created and moving depends on each other because all of them are created from the same one energy and they move with this same energy motion-

NOTICE Let's imagine we have 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and one strong water wave passes through these 4 whirlpools (vortex) - now – suppose we put some red color on this strong water wave- what would happen? The water color will be red and the red water will pass through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)

We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.

That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other –

Now let's analyze each reflection individually

(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)

224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)

AND-

680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –

As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)

The orbital periods definition

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We don't discuss the precession cycle here

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)

It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.

The important notice here tells that- the gravitational wave reflection for one time defines 3 planets orbital periods – this fact is proved strongly by the data and it disproves the wrong idea tells (Planet is created independently from the other planets)

(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)

Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

The comparison shows clearly the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because

The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-

Notice - please note clearly that – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-

It's one gravitational wave sent from Pluto to Neptune and reflected to Saturn then this same wave is sent from Saturn to Uranus and Uranus reflected the same wave to Jupiter and Jupiter sent the same wave to Venus and Venus reflected the same wave to Mars- One Gravitational Wave moves through all these planets

The Conclusion

The planets data is distributed in the reversed direction for the reflected energy- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter but the data is distributed from Jupiter to Uranus- there's a geometrical reason for this behavior we should discover later.

(3) The First Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Neptune To Saturn)

We still have another problem- let's remember this problem reason

The gravitational wave first reflection is done from Pluto to Neptune, supposing Neptune would send the energy to Uranus but Neptune didn't send the energy instead Neptune kept the energy inside its orbit and prevent it to move toward Uranus – also Uranus itself couldn't release the imprisoned energy from Neptune orbit – and that necessitated Saturn itself to create interaction with Neptune to release the imprisoned energy for that the energy is moved toward Saturn immediately by that this reflection of the wave is considered the first reflection because the energy is released from Neptune to Saturn directly – Shortly- the wave energy is sent from Pluto to Neptune and the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and this is the first reflection of the energy (the gravitational wave first reflection)

Let's see the data - The distance 1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) is still a distance And (1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

The data follows the rule (2π, 4π, 8π) perfectly as the other two reflections but the data shows 2 problems which are

1st problem

The data distribution is in the reversed direction of the energy motion direction- because the reflection is done from Neptune to Saturn but the data shows the orbital circumferences of (Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto) are defined by this reflection which supposes the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune and that's NOT Fact

This behavior is typical the behavior of the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter-

Means- this behavior is repeated in the two reflections of energy which tells that the behavior depends on a geometrical reason.

2nd problem

The distance is not changed into a period of time as the other reflections but stayed as a distance! How and why?? let's see deeply this data

If the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune, Saturn orbital circumference 9010 mkm should be changed into a period of time to be 9010 days and then

9010 days x 2π = 2 x 28244 days (28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference)

9010 days x 4π = 113223 days

9010 days x 6π = 169840 days

We see the data gives NO real values- means- this is not the direction of the data creation- Instead – the distance 1433 mkm or the circumference 9010 mkm is still distance and then

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

And

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

We understand that, the data provides a distance (1433 mkm) and not a period of time then we have to ask again why this distance is not changed into a period of time?

We understand that the outer planets have 2 reflections (first reflection from Neptune to Saturn) and (the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter)- also we understand that the solar system needs one reflection only in the outer planets and one reflection only in the inner planets and also we know the outer planets have two reflections because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system- means if Neptune is removed from the solar system the outer planets would have one reflection only – for that- the designer caused the two reflections in the outer planets to be complementary one another – the reflection from Uranus to Jupiter defines the planets orbital periods and the reflection from Neptune to Saturn defines these same planets orbital circumferences

The designer caused to make the two reflections complementary one another and by that the two reflections can be unified into one reflection and based on that the machine will work by one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets- but how the energy motion produces the distances in place of the periods of time? this question is hard to answer because we don't see deeply how the reflection of energy can define each planet orbital period (or orbital circumference) by using the rates (2π, 4π, 6π) we just discovered the rule but more geometrical analysis is required to see how this rule works

NOTICE

In the third reflection (from Venus to Mars) – let's remember the data

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We have asked- why Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate (0.8)?

Let's try to answer – let's see the data 10747 /9800 = 9800/9010 where

10747 days = Saturn orbital period and 9010 mkm = Saturn orbital circumference

9800 mkm = 2 x 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)

We know 4900 mkm and 4900 days is the player in the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter- means- Saturn has effect also in the second reflection for that the second reflection has effect on Saturn data and caused its orbital period to be produced under the effect of the rate (0.8) which is the reflection rate as we will see in the next data

Group Data No (II)

(1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

(2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

Discussion

We discuss the data no. (2) and (3) at first

DATA NO. (2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(0.421 mkm = Uranus motion distance in its rotation period)

DATA NO. (3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

(0.3129 mkm = Neptune motion distance in its rotation period)

MORE DATA

0.5875 mkm (Uranus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.46688 mkm

(0.466884 mkm = Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Neptune motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3736 mkm

(0.3736 mkm = Saturn motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Pluto motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3248 mkm

(i)

The rate (0.8) is created by the waves reflection and the planets velocities are defined based on each other by this rate as discussed in the planet velocity definition- here the data shows the rate (0.8) defines each planet motion distance based on the other planet motion distance (in the same one reflection) –

let's explain that in more details

(1st reflection From Neptune to Saturn) for that

Saturn motion distance per solar day (0.838 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Neptune motion distance in its rotation period 0.3129 million km

Also

Neptune motion distance per solar day (0.46688 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 million km

AND

(2nd reflection From Uranus to Jupiter) for that

Jupiter motion distance per solar day (1.1318 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Uranus motion distance in its rotation period 0.421 million km

Also

Uranus motion distance per solar day (0.5875 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period 0.46688 million km

AND

In the 3rd reflection we will see Mars motion distance per solar day is defined by Venus motion distance per solar day- follows the same rule

Notice

We note the data No. (2) and (3) show the data is distributed in the reversed direction for the energy motion because the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and from Uranus to Jupiter- But data is distributed in the reversed direction-

In the third reflection we will see the data moves in the same direction with the energy distribution

Also

In Venus data we will see that it uses the square value (0.8)^2 and we will explain why the rate is used in square value

(ii)

Why is the rate (1.0725) found in the data? because the gravitational wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s) in Saturn orbit and in all planets orbits till Venus orbit-

Shortly

the wave velocity was 205.8 km/s through Pluto, Neptune and Uranus orbits BUT

The wave velocity is accelerated in Saturn orbit and its velocity be = speed of light =300000 km/s, for that reason the rate (1.0725) is created because this is (Lorentz length contraction effect rate) and it can be produced only by motion with speed=(99% speed of light =297000 km/s)- shortly- the wave velocity be equal=speed of light = 300000 km/s in Saturn orbit, for that the rate (1.0725) is produced in the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter as the data shows (and also in Venus data we will see it)

(iii)

The previous data shows the planets distances are rated by the rate (0.8) for the planets players in the same wave reflection- but- this picture is not complete yet – because the planets which aren't players in the same reflection shows equal distances also but this distances equality doesn't depend on the rate (0.8) let's give examples

Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period = Neptune motion distance per solar day =0.466884 million km

And

Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 mkm x π = Uranus motion distance per solar day 0.5875 mkm x 2

And

The Earth motion distance per solar day = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period = 2.574 million km

This distances equality must be produced also by the waves reflection but the rule is not clear yet- I want to say the effect of the rate (0.8) on the planets distances is part of greater rule explains how this distances equality is produced and the useful result of it –

Please note–I analyze this data in details in 2nd part of this 1st hypothesis explanation-

Now

Let's discuss the data No.(1)

DATA NO. (1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (The Earth motion distance per solar day) = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day= Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

Means

3.024 million km x (0.8)^2 x 1.0725 = 2.082 million km where

3.024 mkm =Venus motion distance per solar day

2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day

Notice

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day

2.57 mkm = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm The moon motion distance per solar day

2.59 mkm = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

The data tells Mars motion distance per solar day depends on Venus motion distance per solar day – here all distances are defined by the solar day-

In the third reflection- the wave is reflected from Venus to Mars- here also Venus motion distance per solar day (3.024 mkm) defines Mars motion distance per solar day (2.082 mkm)- but the definition depends on the squared value (0.8)^2

That shows Venus reflection follows the same rule used by the other reflections – where the sender planet motion distance per solar day defines the receiver planet motion distance

Perfectly the rule is followed BUT Why does Venus use the square value (0.8)^2??

Because of the reflections order – let's explain that

The two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and by that they are unified and can be considered as One Unified Reflection in the outer planets

Means- there is one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets and these are two reflections- means – Venus reflection should be considered the second reflection that causes to square the value (0.8)- that explains why Venus uses the squared Value (0.8)^2

Notice

This is a proof for my theory that (one gravitational wave is reflected three times)- means- this wave is reflected before and effected by the rate (0.8) and this same wave is reflected again for that the rate (0.8) be in its squared value (0.8)^2

The Conclusion

The gravitational waves reflection causes the sender planet motion distance to define the receiver planet motion distance as seen in the data- the definition depends on the rate (0.8) – here we see one rule proves the receiver planet motion depends on the sender planet motion-

Group Data No (III)

(1)

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

(2)

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6

(3)

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

And

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

Discussion

Data No. (1)

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

568 x 10^24 kg = Saturn Mass

102 x 10^24 kg = Neptune Mass

59800 days = Neptune orbital period

10747 days = Saturn orbital period

In the first reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Neptune to Saturn

This behavior shows second rule– for the planets in the same reflection- we see the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate and this behavior is used by the other two reflections- means- the gravitational wave reflection between two planets cause these two planets masses rate to define their orbital periods rate – let's see the rest data

Data No. (2)

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6 (notice1407.6π =4331 error 2%)

1898 x 10^24 kg = Jupiter Mass

86.8 x 10^24 kg = Uranus Mass

30589 days = Uranus orbital period

4331 days = Jupiter orbital period

In second reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter

It's the same rule and behavior, the planets masses rates defines their orbital periods

Just Jupiter orbital period 4331 is divided by (π) – no any other change in the rule proves that the rule is a fact and used with the planets of the same reflection

Data No. (3)

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

4.87 x 10^24 kg = Venus Mass and 0.642 x 10^24 kg= Mars Mass

224.7 days = Venus orbital period and 687 days= Mars orbital period

In the third reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Venus to Mars

Here also we see the planets use the same rule and the same behavior – the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate-But the rate is squared! Why?

Venus Mass = 7.6 Mars Mass but the data uses the squared rate (7.6)^2 –

We should pay attention for this rate because the other planets used their masses rate but NOT squared value – Why does Venus use the squared value (7.6)^2?

We have solved this question in the distances discussion when Venus used (0.8)^2 and the other planets use (0.8) only- here also is similar to that- let's remember the reason

We agreed that the two wave reflections in the outer planets are complementary one another and by that they are unified together into one unified reflection and by that the outer planets has one unified reflection and the inner planets has one single reflection and these are considered as two reflections and for that Venus reflection is considered the second one in the solar system (and the final one) for that Venus uses the squared Value – where we know the wave reflection causes to square the value

Notice - 5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747) = (10/1.8) =9010/1622 where 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination and 10 =4 x 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) and -9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference and 1622 mkm = Neptune Uranus Distance

Notice π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%) – this data is discussed in the next point

The Conclusion The Wave Reflection Causes The Sender And Receiver Planets Masses Rate To Define Their Orbital Periods Rate.

Group Data No (IV)

(1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

(2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 =5.56/2

(3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Discussion

Notice

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

This data shows the rates (5.56) and (7.6) are found based on the value (π^3=31) I try to prove that it's one energy (one value π^3=31) and the different rates as (5.56 and 7.6) are found depending on (this one value π^3=31) by geometrical reasons – that proves it's one energy (one wave) is reflected three times in the solar system – the value (π^3 = 31 =) is very important because all rates depend on it

The group data shows the planets diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 =31)- let's examine it in following

Data No. (1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination

1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination

The data shows the two planets diameters are rated with rate equal their orbital inclination and this rate equal π^0.5

Notice

177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) x 93.4

90+ 3.4 = 93.4 deg

Data No. (2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 = 5.56

We remember 31 = (5.56)^2

Data No. (3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Also we remember 31/4 = 7.75 (and the difference between 7.75 and 7.6 is 2%)

The data shows the diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 = 31 =) as the masses do

Means- the planets masses and diameters are created rated to one another based on this same value (π^3 = 31 =)

I try to prove that – one energy is found behind all this data- the value (π^3 = 31 =) refers to one energy and this energy is effected by different geometrical reasons and that causes this energy (π^3 = 31 =) to show different rates as (5.56) and (7.6)

Shortly – we deal with one energy reflected three times in the solar system and the planets data are defined by the effect of this energy on them

Please note- we can imagine one river of water moves through different cities and each city deals with the river based on its own data- one city has great soil and this uses the river water to plant vegetables and fruits- another city its ground has many holes and caves the river water will cause all these holes to be filled of water and that will create many moors in this city and that will not be useful for it –

We have here the same picture-

One energy moves through the solar system and reflected three times in it and this reflection causes changes for the planets data for that the different rates (5.56 and 7.6) are created from this one energy (π^3 = 31 =) by geometrical reasons have effects on it.

Group Data No (V)

(1) 243 mkm = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days

(2) 17.2 km = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds

(3) 16.1 km = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds

Discussion

We discuss data No. (2) and (3) at first

Data No. (2)

17.2 km = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds

13.1 km /s = Jupiter velocity

1.13129 = (5.25/4) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56

17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period

Data No. (3)

16.1 km = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds

9.7 km /s = Saturn velocity

1.65 = (5.25/π) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56

16.1 hours = Neptune rotation period

The data shows each planet rotation period depends on the other planet velocity based on the rate (5.56) where (31=5.56^2)- that shows Uranus rotation period is connected with Jupiter velocity and Neptune rotation period is connected with Saturn velocity proves that a deep connection is found between each two planets as a result for the wave reflection between them

Data No. (1)

243 mkm = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days

243 days = Venus rotation period

2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day and 116.75 days = Venus day period

We see also here – Venus rotation period is related to Mars velocity- and this similar to the other planets behavior as we have discussed before

Notice

Venus (35 km/s) moves in 10747 seconds a distance = 378675 km

Where

378675 km = Saturn circumference

10747 days = Saturn orbital period

We know that- No direct reflection is found between Venus and Saturn- but the data shows deep interaction is found between them

I want to say

I provide different data to prove my hypothesis tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and the waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity) for that I put different data trying to prove this hypothesis

But- the real design is much complex than this small hypothesis- because this hypothesis refers to one rule found in the design but the design is consisted of hundreds of rules and by that I provide very narrow vision for the whole truth-

Imagine we examine the artery connected between the human liver and his heart- it's one artery – it's fact and real piece of the human body but it's just one artery of many others- I want to say- the real vision of the solar system is so wide than this one I provide here- that's why the rules are not complete- but I provide strong data can prove my hypothesis and can show a piece of truth about the solar system real design.

Group Data No (VI)

(1)

177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2

(2)

97.8 degrees = 31 x 3.1 degrees

(3)

28.3 degrees (Neptune axial tilt) = 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) x 1.0725

Discussion

Data No. (1)

177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2

177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt

25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt BUT 25.2 +90 = 115.2 degrees

Please note

(12104 km Venus diameter / 6792 km Mars diameter) = 3.4/1.9 = π^0.5

(3.4 deg and 1.9 deg are the orbital inclinations of Venus and Mars respectively)

And

(177.4 deg Venus axial tilt / 115.2 degrees) = π/2

We see clearly the data depend on the value (π^3) and different geometrical reasons have effect on this value to produce these rates (π^0.5 and π/2)

Data No. (2)

97.8 degrees = 31 x 3.1 degrees

97.8 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt

3.1 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt

The data still depends on this same value (π^3= 31)

Group Data No (VII)

The distance 1433 million km

This distance should prove the energy is transported and the waves are reflected in the solar system because this distance is used frequently in the solar system and no explanation for such using better than the reflection of energy – let’s see its data

1433 million km = Mars Orbital Circumference

1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

1433 million km = Uranus Saturn Distance

2 x 1433 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance

π x 1433 million km = Neptune Orbital Distance

(π+1) x 1433 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance

1410 million km = Pluto Neptune Distance (with 1433 mkm error 1.7%)

Also

1433 days = 2π x 224.7 days (Venus Orbital Period)

Logically there's a geometrical reason to cause all these distances to be equal and rated to each other based on this same root (1433)- and the wave reflection can be this geometrical reason by which this data is created.

III- The Explanation Of The Wave Reflection Effect On The Solar System Design

The gravitational waves reflection has great effect on the solar system design- let's refer to this effect in following

The Planets Distribution

The three outer planets (Pluto- Neptune- Uranus) have great orbits- why?

Because the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s in these orbits and the planets motions energies are stored in these orbits as waves move by this velocity 205.8 km/s – means – great and massive motion energy is stored in these orbit where the waves move by 205.8 km/s that needed great areas to store so massive amount of energy

BUT

The Waves Velocity Is Accelerated In Saturn Orbit

This is the important point- because- the interaction between the outer planets caused to reflect the wave in Saturn orbit firstly and this reflection causes to square the velocity and then the velocity is squared and be equal the speed of light – means- the gravitational waves move by speed of light starting from Saturn orbit and continues with this speed till Venus and the other inner planets-

This is very important picture because

The low velocity 205.8 km/s needed great areas that causes the orbits or Pluto, Neptune and Uranus to be so great areas – BUT

The high speed motion (speed of light) doesn't need great areas – that's why the planets orbits from Saturn to Mercury are small orbits and the inner has very small orbits because the energy doesn't depend on the number of waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s but the energy depends on the motion be speed of light by that the energy of 1461 waves move by 205.8 km/s be equal the energy of one wave moves by speed of light – that causes the orbits to be small orbits – and that explains the distribution of the planets from the sun to Pluto.

And for that

When the massive reflected energy reached to Venus- it doesn't destroy the small inner planets and their orbits because the energy is used immediately to produce the sun rays means no need for storing the energy and for that no places for the energy storing instead the energy is used immediately- I try to show that- the planets distribution depends on the gravitational waves velocity in different orbits and by that the planets create their orbits in harmony with the moving energy

The Planets Masses Distribution

The outer planets have great masses but the inner planets have very small masses- why? because the difference in masses enable to accelerate the wave velocity in Saturn orbit-this idea is explained clearly in (Mass definition) in my paper definitions

The mass is used as a rate of time and the rates between the great and small masses aim to create the required rates of time and by these rates of time the wave velocity is accelerated- let's explain that in following

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected] [email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publicationshttp://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

3 notes · View notes

notasfilosoficas · 11 months ago

Text

“Muchos hombres, cómo los niños, quieren una cosa pero no sus consecuencias”

José Ortega y Gasset

Fue un filósofo y ensayista español, nacido en Madrid en mayo de 1863, exponente principal de la teoría del perspectivismo.

Nació en el seno de una familia madrileña acomodada, era hijo del escritor y director del periódico “El imparcial” José Ortega Munilla, quien a su vez, su padre había sido el fundador del periódico, por lo que se crió en un ambiente culto vinculado al mundo del periodismo y de la política.

Estudió en la universidad de Deusto en Bilbao, y prosiguió en la facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad Central de Madrid.

En 1904, obtuvo su doctorado en Filosofía y entre 1905 y 1907 realizó estudios en Alemania, en donde se vio influido por el neokantismo de Hermann Cohen y Paul Natorp.

De regreso a España, es nombrado profesor de psicología, lógica y ética en la Escuela Superior de Magisterio de Madrid, y en 1910 gana por oposición la cátedra de metafísica.

Cuando comenzó la guerra civil española en 1936, estuvo en el exilio, primero en París y luego en los Países Bajos y Buenos Aires, hasta fijar su residencia en Lisboa en 1942. Regresa a España en 1945 para fundar un Instituto de Humanidades.

Ortega y Gasset ejerció una gran influencia en la filosofía española y en la filosofía iberoamericana del siglo XX, tanto por su obra filosófica como por su estilo literario ágil.

Como exponente de la teoría del perspectivismo o “doctrina de la vista”, sostiene que toda percepción e ideación es subjetiva. El individuo mira desde un punto de vista concreto, en una dirección propia.

Para Ortega, la perspectiva es la forma que adopta la realidad para el individuo. Esto no le hace caer en el subjetivismo, pues para él, cada sujeto tiene su propia forma de acceder a la realidad, su propia parte de verdad, que puede ser incluso contradictoria con la de los demás.

Esta doctrina, se basa en que el carácter situado en el conocimiento humano, implica que conocer un objeto, es siempre conocer la perspectiva concreta y limitada del objeto, no estrictamente el objeto en su totalidad, por lo que todo conocimiento exige siempre ser completado.

Para Ortega, la finalidad que busca el conocimiento, es otorgar un suelo firme y seguro a la vida, es decir, una interpretación de la realidad que convierta el caos inmediato en una forma estable y predecible, con la finalidad de salvar al hombre de la situación de desorientación y evitar que se sienta perdido en el mundo, todo esto, a través del conocimiento, cuyo ejercicio solo tiene sentido a la luz de este problematismo esencial de la vida.

Importantes discípulos suyos fueron José Gaos, Manuel Garcia Morente y Xavier Zubiri entre otros muchos.

Tras la guerra civil, la recepción del pensamiento de Ortega sufrió muchas dificultades, fue objeto de duras e intensas campañas de desprestigio y crítica que veían en él la causa de todos los males que habían acaecido en España en esos años.

En las décadas de los 60 y 70 fue poco el interés por sus escritos, sin embargo a partir de los años 80, surgió un despertar hacia su pensamiento y obra que desató nuevas ediciones de sus escritos.

Ortega y Gasset falleció en octubre de 1955 en Madrid a la edad de 72 años.

Fuente: Wikipedia

#citas de reflexion #frases de reflexion #notasfilosoficas #citas de escritores #citas de la vida #filosofos #frases celebres #frases de escritores #notas de vida #españa

22 notes · View notes

franciskovsky · 2 years ago

Text

LIBROS PREFERIDOS

- El psicoanalista - John Katzenbach

- La filosofía de House - William Irwin y Henry Jacoby - El pequeño Quijote (y su mancha) - Johann Page - Ensayo sobre la ceguera - José Saramago - El arte de la guerra - Sun Tzu - Las intermitencias de la muerte - José Saramago - El gato negro (Narraciones extraordinarias) - Edgar Allan Poe - La culpa es de la vaca - Jaime Lopera Gutiérrez y Marta Inés Bernal Trujillo - El ciclo del hombre lobo - Stephen King - Así hablaba Zaratustra - Friedrich Nietzsche - El resplandor - Stephen King - La virtud del egoísmo - Ayn Rand - Metafísica 4 en 1 - Conny Méndez - Harry Potter y El Prisionero de Azkaban - J.K. Rowling - Cuentos - Fiódor Mijailovich Dostoievski (FMD) - El banquete - Platón

#FM #EfeEme #Preferido #Psicología #Autor #Martín #Español #Inglés #Literatura #Ruso #Latino #Referencia #Prosa #Historia #Terror #Género #Suspenso #Magia #Bélico #Portugal #Sabiduría

11 notes · View notes

sefaradweb · 11 days ago

Text

Jacques Derrida’s Life as an Algerian Jew Revealed in Newly Translated Bio

🇪🇸 Jacques Derrida, nacido el 15 de julio de 1930 en Biar, Argelia, fue un filósofo influyente, conocido principalmente por su creación de la teoría de la deconstrucción. Su vida estuvo marcada por su identidad como judío argelino, lo que tuvo un impacto profundo en su pensamiento y en sus obras. En 1942, durante la ocupación del régimen de Vichy, fue excluido de la escuela debido a su origen judío y experimentó una intensa discriminación que moldeó su visión crítica sobre la identidad y la homogeneidad. Derrida también pasó por la guerra de independencia de Argelia (1957-1959) y, aunque se opuso al colonialismo francés, buscó una solución política que permitiera la convivencia de los franceses argelinos con los nativos. En su vida académica, enseñó en prestigiosas universidades como la Sorbonne en París y la Universidad de California en Irvine. Su obra más conocida, como "De la gramática" (1967), desmanteló la metafísica occidental y redefinió conceptos de lenguaje, identidad y verdad. Además de su pensamiento filosófico, Derrida se vio afectado por las tensiones políticas en Francia y Argelia, lo que se reflejó en su enfoque filosófico y político, particularmente en sus escritos sobre el conflicto israelí-palestino. Derrida falleció el 8 de octubre de 2004 dejando un legado filosófico que continúa influenciando múltiples disciplinas.

🇺🇸 Jacques Derrida, born July 15, 1930 in Biar, Algeria, was an influential philosopher, best known for creating deconstruction theory. His life was marked by his identity as an Algerian Jew, which had a profound impact on his thinking and works. In 1942, during the Vichy regime's occupation, he was excluded from school due to his Jewish heritage and faced intense discrimination, shaping his critical view on identity and homogeneity. Derrida also experienced the Algerian War of Independence (1957-1959), and although he opposed French colonialism, he sought a political solution that would allow French Algerians to coexist with native Algerians. In his academic life, he taught at prestigious universities such as the Sorbonne in Paris and the University of California, Irvine. His most famous work, such as "Of Grammatology" (1967), dismantled Western metaphysics and redefined concepts of language, identity, and truth. Beyond his philosophical thought, Derrida was influenced by the political tensions in France and Algeria, which is reflected in his writings on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Derrida passed away on October 8, 2004, leaving a philosophical legacy that continues to influence many disciplines.

0 notes

saladieciocho · 1 month ago

Text

5° Lima Alterna IFF: Dahomey + Architecton

Escribe: Luis Vélez.

Recomiendo dos extraordinarias películas que tuvieron importante presencia en la más reciente Berlinale y otros festivales y espacios mundiales de cine, y que no podrían verse en pantalla grande por estos lares de no ser por el Lima Alterna Festival Internacional de Cine, de estimulante y magnífica programación y muy valiosa organización, ahora en su quinta edición. Dahomey, de Mati Diop.-

(Francia, Senegal, Benín; 2024)

Bajo la afortunada experiencia de visitar museos como el Louvre o el Pérgamo, es inevitable ser conmovidos por un extraño sentimiento de abrumación al recorrer las salas que albergan piezas y figuras ancestrales de civilizaciones del pasado geográficamente lejanas a Europa, una discusión en sí misma. ¿Cómo llegaron ahí? Varias como parte de botines de guerra, saqueos, obsequios de líderes corruptos, disposiciones de tiempos coloniales. Al observar con atención estos objetos, más aún cuando acarrean en sí cargas históricas sagradas, la sensación es de una pesadumbre cercana al miedo. La imprescindible cineasta franco-senegalesa Mati Diop documenta un momento (y proceso) clave, concentrado hábilmente en una hora de duración: la repatriación de un significativo número de estos tesoros, desde Francia hasta Benín, el país africano en el que floreció el reino de Dahomey.

youtube

Diop hace eco fantástico de la reflexión de una de las piezas, un objeto fríamente designado por un número de catálogo ha de convertirse en embajador retornando de un encierro, acaso un dios o un rey de Dahomey. Este conferir de un habla a un personaje centenario se materializa en el filme a través de una efectiva, intimidante y resonante voz en off que va narrando esta estadía y tránsito. El diseño de sonido y la musicalización contribuyen a esta meditación. En una segunda parte va a generarse un siguiente debate, al arribar los tesoros a Benin.

Dahomey (2024), de Mati Diop.

Es toda una conversación encendida sobre visiones tanto gubernamentales como ciudadanas sobre pertenencia, memoria y, coronando ello, un magnífico debate sobre colonialismo que en la universidad beninesa de Abomey-Calavi tendrá en sus estudiantes, lidiando inclusive con el hecho de hablar francés, la mejor muestra de un discurso abierto que Diop potencia con un tratamiento cinematográfico que amalgama el documental político con una dimensión metafísica.

Dahomey (2024), de Mati Diop.

Architecton, de Victor Kossakovsky.-

(Alemania, Francia, Estados Unidos; 2024)

El ejercicio de contemplación al que induce Architecton resulta tan asombroso como sobrecogedor. Concebido como un filme documental sobre diversos conceptos detrás y delante de la construcción de edificaciones a lo largo de los tiempos remotos de la humanidad, la deliberación es múltiple, pero centrales los esfuerzos y bríos de Michele De Lucchi, arquitecto y diseñador italiano, figura de la película, al igual que los de su director, el experimentado documentalista ruso Victor Kossakovsky (Belovy, Russia from My Window, ¡Vivan las antípodas!, Gunda), por poner luces y filosofar ante lo abrumante del tema, expuesto tanto con lirismo como lucidez. Son más de una las preguntas provocadas: las nociones de la durabilidad de las construcciones, la conservación de los restos del pasado, lo precario en el presente, la planificación del futuro.

youtube

Una dialéctica de megalitos y colosos erigidos ocultando o develando secretos, en contraposición a modestos barrios, y la destrucción a manos de las fuerzas de la naturaleza, recorre paisajes de la urbanidad antigua y moderna, bella y caótica, en Turquía, Italia o Líbano. El enfoque cinematográfico, aún al interior de las formas del cine de la realidad, es esencialmente poético en su elaboración audiovisual. Se suceden imágenes (con fotografía de Ben Bernhard) que deben verse en pantalla grande, algunas de toma abierta e impresionantes aéreas que sirven para los propósitos del análisis.

Architecton (2024), de Victor Kossakovsky.

Asimismo, la música de Evgueni Galperine y el diseño sonoro de Alexander Dudarev realzan la propuesta de un documental que no deja indiferente ante la meditación de saber que el concreto -el acumulado por siglos, el de hoy, el del futuro- es mucho más abundante de lo que creemos, de ahí que al colocar en la ecuación la hermosura o la fealdad de nuestras edificaciones, para este planeta, el material es sencillamente igual de perjudicial. En consecuencia, Architecton es, sin duda, una advertencia.

Architecton (2024), de Victor Kossakovsky

Horarios y sedes:

Architecton se podrá ver este lunes 14 a las 6:30 p.m. en la Sala Azul del CCPUCP.

Dahomey se podrá ver este lunes 14 y el miércoles 16, ambas fechas a las 7:00 p.m., en Cineplanet Alcázar.

El dato adicional: Dahomey no es la única película ganadora de un Oso de Oro del Festival de Cine de Berlín 2024 pues se proyectará antecedida de la película corta argentina Un movimiento extraño, de Francisco Lezama, acreedora de equivalente galardón en el mismo festival.

0 notes

prensabolivariana · 2 months ago

Text

Geraldine Coloti* Nunca nos ha importado que algunos fascistas europeos voten por una resolución sin ningún valor contra la soberanía de Venezuela”. Así, con la dignidad y el orgullo de quien se siente heredero del Libertador, el presidente de la Asamblea Nacional venezolana, Jorge Rodríguez comentó la resolución del Parlamento europeo de «reconocer» como «presidente electo» al ex candidato de extrema derecha, Edmundo González Urrutia. En el mismo tono fue el comunicado del canciller, Yvan Gil, al definir como «folleto ridículo dictado por Washington» la declaración con la que, en el Consejo de Derechos Humanos, 40 países «denunciaron a Nicolás Maduro». Un intento de reeditar el fallido Grupo de Lima, iniciado en el momento de la anterior autoproclamación, en 2019. Resulta grotesco que haya sido la canciller argentina, Diana Mondino, quien guió la conducta del grupo en la ONU: la portavoz de Javier Milei, quien a diario baja la «motosierra» sobre los derechos básicos del pueblo argentino. No tiene sentido que los países europeos definan a una golpista declarada, María Corina Machado, como «líder de las fuerzas democráticas». Es significativo, sin embargo, que el magnate de las plataformas digitales, Elon Musk, haya recibido a Milei a bombo y platillo, y ahora haya entregado un premio a la primera ministra italiana de extrema derecha, Giorgia Meloni. Todos, evidentemente, grandes defensores de la democracia. Igualmente «democráticas» han sido las amenazas pronunciadas por el jefe de Black Water, Erik Prince, de reservar «sorpresas» mercenarias para Venezuela, como de hecho ha ocurrido, en el ensordecedor silencio de los medios europeos. Sin embargo, aún más sintomático del cortocircuito que prevalece en los países europeos es el voto de la “izquierda” (liberal e imperialista) contra Venezuela en el parlamento europeo, emitido incluso por los representantes －supuestamente－ más sensibles a la defensa de los «derechos». Este fue el caso de la eurodiputada Carola Rackete, elegida por la Alianza Verde y de Izquierda (AVS), que no sólo votó a favor del neofascismo venezolano, sino también a favor del ucraniano, sumándose a los que aprobaron el uso de armas europeas, directamente, sobre territorio ruso. Varios ecologistas y miembros de la izquierda europea votaron a favor de la guerra, junto con el Partido Popular y los liberales. El representante de la Liga, Matteo Salvini, se pronunció, sin embargo, contra el uso de armas europeas en territorio ruso, por ser portavoz de empresas del norte que tienen sus intereses en Rusia, y ciertamente no por ir contra los intereses del complejo militar-industrial y de la OTAN que lo dirige. La ambientalista Rackete fue elegida por la izquierda pacifista italiana por oponerse a las políticas xenófobas de Salvini (ahora en juicio) y por salvar a los inmigrantes en el Mediterráneo, convertido en cementerio marino. Prueba de lo lejana que está la voz de Chávez cuando afirmó: «Cambiar el sistema para cambiar el clima». Un cortocircuito que, mientras avanzan viejos y nuevos fascismos, favorecidos por la anomia impuesta a las generaciones más jóvenes, desvela el «pacifismo bélico» de una «izquierda» sin horizonte, y devuelve al presente el debate marxista del siglo pasado, que Venezuela renueva. Sin embargo, para imponer una nueva metafísica útil para el sistema dominante, los hechos y las responsabilidades reales deben desaparecer. Y así, como lo denunció el gobierno bolivariano en la ONU, las 27 víctimas de los «comanditos» de Machado desaparecen, mientras se multiplican las denuncias por presuntas violaciones de derechos humanos atribuidas a Maduro. Lo que intentan reactivar en la ONU es la llamada Misión Internacional Independiente de Determinación de los Hechos sobre la República Bolivariana de Venezuela, aprobada en 2019 por el Consejo de Derechos Humanos tras la votación de los países del llamado Grupo de Lima, que había «reconocido» a Guaidó, con apoyo de la Organización de Estados Ameri...

#Geraldina Colotti #Opinión

0 notes

ayudarajzaaganarmillonessiempree · 5 months ago

Text

Resumen España - Georgia (4 -1) | Eurocopa 2024, Todas, todos quienes saben de nosotros o nos conocen estos días de partidos, o siempre, o si van a venir a españa, o si sois de aquí, debéis haceros las fotos, los selfies, los videos, EN LA PUERTA DE ALCALÁ. Y EN LA PUERTA DE EUROPA.

Me quiero desguevar de la risa con este video y tu. Que luchas, que rabias, que te rompes los sesos, que aguantas, que te quiebran, que te sientes xenófobo, AHÍ ESTA, AHÍ ESTA LA PUERTA DE ALCALÁ JAJAJA Y TODOS LOS DÍAS VIENEN MÁS JAJAJA https://youtu.be/-u2RZNCXSQI?si=BaeXfq5BOLUP_99S

https://youtu.be/OCpFtnlj65U?si=Q4hyp40hWiRqhSTx A destacar el gol de Iñaki Williams jajaja todos los peruanos y peruanas deben admirar Iñaki Williams, todos todas los inmigrantes deben admirar a Iñaki Williams, A TODOS LOS JUGADORES EXTRANJEROS EN ESPAÑA y se debe establecer en españa otra vez LA UNIÓN DE JUGADORES EXTRANJEROS EN ESPAÑA. CONTRA EL NACIONALISMO RACISTA. Me llegaron al paajjaarroo los funcionarios, ellos cobran para ser responsables de todo delito falta o infracción sin distinción.... Cobran para que nosotros vivamos felices y disfrutemos de todas nuestras libertades....

Reírse a carcajadas ridiculizando todas vuestras guerras....

REÍRSE A CARCAJADAS RIDICULIZANDO todas vuestras guerras de las galaxias entre vecinos a te lo resumo así no más.

Todas vuestras GUERRAS DE LAS GALAXIAS, A " TE LO RESUMO ASÍ NO MÁS " Y A REÍRSE A CARCAJADAS PORQUE AQUÍ NO QUEREMOS MÁS GUERRAS DE LAS GALAXIAS....... Guerras de las galaxias a mujeres, a euros, a pen, a mestizaje, a racismo, a indios y vaqueros, a derecho, a parte, denuncia, demanda, loco, a el congreso, a poner problemitas a otros para que resuelvan, a poner casos situaciones a otros para que resuelvan o defiendan, a cobrar delitos, faltas e infracciones, indemnizaciónes, multas y sanciones, a delitos informáticos, a falsas acusaciones, a zurdos y diestros, a fastidiar o hacer el bien, a la metafísica, a telequinética(presionar, pisar, hacer daño), a la telepatía, a causa y efecto, a guerras de las galaxias machistas, masculinas, todas estas guerritas de las galaxias fuera y muy lejos, eliminar, extinguir, viciar, ridiculizar, menguar, exterminar prescribir. Y riamos todos, todas de los casos más graves, hacer el ranking de guerras de las galaxias para hacer el te lo resumo así no más y reírse a carcajadas de todo. Paso de todo, y me elijo a las más guapas de todo el mundo con quienes tener buenos sentimientos... Y seres queridos.

0 notes

verbrrhage · 7 months ago

Text

tenho tentado fazer as pazes com meu corpo há quase um década, se duvidar. hoje, sou cúmplice de uma morte-pequena. por onde passo, carrego o fato sombrio nas costas que tenho uma lembrança antiga, sem data, sem localização e sem explicação, como uma fotografia velha avulsa numa gaveta-relicário, de olhar pro espelho e não reconhecer nada. lembro nitidamente dela, a vítima desencarnada; seu olhar avulso, seu perfume de maçã, seus declives e seus pelos; "era tudo culpa dela".

lembro do ensino médio. e de cogitar tomar laxantes pra emagrecer. porque um colega tinha dito que fez isso quando voltou das férias magérrimo. lembro de cobrir e esconder todos os espelhos de casa no auge da pandemia. lembro de pensar que talvez eu tenha, sim, de fato nascido com os hormônios errados. e essas coisas que todo mundo com alguma disforia de imagem corporal sofre. por muito tempo meu corpo foi apenas isso: carne e matéria maldita. carbono, cálcio, ferro, nitrogênio e água. marcas, dobras, curvas, rugas e cicatrizes. as por opção, as naturais. e estrias, varizes, manchas. um rosto sarapintado de uma luta contra a acne que perdura praticamente até hoje. um veículo de dores musculares e doenças e decaimento. um receptáculo de falhas e imperfeições. essa prisão orgânica, uma massa de desejos e frustrações. confusa, monstruosa, abominável. como uma casa jogada ao léu, talvez, entupida até o teto de entulho e insegurança. uma casa caindo aos pedaços, de onde sempre quis fugir. de onde sempre estive de visita — uma visita incômoda e inconveniente. algo transitório, efêmero e que um dia chegará ao fim (tenho certeza disso). e eu quis transcendência. quis ser ideia, espírito e consciência, mente e abstração, nada concreto, nada tangível e perceptível, apenas… metafísica. em algum momento antigo enquanto minha infância querida se esvaía, tomar banho nos rios da minha casa sem camisa de repente virou uma espécie de tortura dolorosa e humilhante. quem dera fosse apenas vaidade, mas sinto que se trata na verdade uma espécie de assassinato. acho que quando a gente se odeia assim desse jeito doentio, deve também matar um pouco de si.

algumas semanas atrás fui entrevistado num programa da TV local. coisinha rápida, simples, vapt-vupt, nada muito chique, uma fala curta sobre a greve das universidades e só. provavelmente algo que já foi deletado e esquecido. e provavelmente algo que não ficou lá tão péssimo, mas não quero nem chegar perto da gravação. só o pensamento de que apareci no ao vivo e que fui percebido de alguma forma já me apavora e me envergonha. passei o dia torcendo para que a edição tivesse decidido me cortar, mas lá estava minha voz. essa voz estrangeira, esse idioma alienígena. só faz lembrar que em mim morava uma presença, uma luz, uma calidez que por algum motivo desapareceu. quero de volta, de volta, de volta. quero novamente aquela mente. quero de volta minha descontração, minha inculpabilidade e minha criancice. e eu tenho lutado pra recuperar algo. só que tentar melhorar às vezes parece mais uma guerra santa, uma cruzada, uma marcha sagrada. ou uma corrida até o topo de uma ladeira íngreme. quando me imagino, ainda sou rascunho e rasura. tenho tentado desenhar uma forma, uma figura; é a sutura e a cicatrização de acostumar-se com essa… "coisa" que eu sou. coisa-material. coisa-corpo. coisa-viva. coisa-que-ocupa-espaço. enxergo-a com temor relutante. na beira da floresta escura da despersonalização. hesito em tocá-la, bicho amedrontado e psicótico. distancio-me de mim mesmo e percebo meus contornos e as lascas e as quinas raspadas e laceradas por onde me dilapidei e me podei e tentei me encaixar. em cada canto que passei, deve ter sobrado um pouco de mim.

tem um componente curricular desse período que vem me fazendo pensar muito sobre tudo: a psicomotricidade. a gente conversa demais sobre o corpo na escola e na sociedade. a gente fala de Descartes, lê Corpos Dóceis do Foucault, trabalha com Le Breton e Merleau-Ponty e vê que o corpo não é só matéria. corpo é uma unidade onde se entrelaça e se mistura o que é físico, biológico, cultural, simbólico, na sua totalidade. “um corpo vivo, presente, em movimento, dotado de intencionalidade, de motricidade e de sexualidade”. o corpo como palco de violência. e o corpo como elemento identitário. tenho tido um pouco de coragem pra falar das minhas inseguranças nessas aulas. não com muita profundidade... mas é um passo adiante admitir pra uma sala de gente semi-desconhecida que você sempre sentiu que teu corpo é como uma prisão, né? é progresso ler uma lista de defeitos que tu enxerga em si mesmo numa discussão de autoimagem, né? tenho feito isso e, logo após, tenho falado que quero melhorar. pra não derrubar o clima, claro... (porque é um crime de baixo astral, afinal, né?) e pra não pensarem que eu só sou assim todo torto e quebrado; meio mórbido, meio pessimista. a gente finge que tá inteiro, que tá bem, que tá saudável. e eu me pergunto quem ainda ficaria do meu lado se soubesse das barbaridades que essa voz miserável grita pelo manicômio.

todavia, sinceramente, a tentativa de melhorar tem um fundo de verdade. uma parte de mim quer isso. tenho me forçado a acreditar nesse meu direito inato de permanecer nessa terra, que não seja só da boca pra fora. um jusnaturalismo existencial em face aos crimes do tardo-capitalismo. falta tempo e dinheiro pra academia, pro nutricionista e pra terapia de verdade, mas pro pobre sempre falta tempo e dinheiro pra tudo, né? só que... eu sei que não posso trabalhar assim. não posso chegar numa sala de aula e encorajar essas crianças a se sentirem bem com si mesmas, a valorizarem seu universo corporal e lembrarem que elas são fruto de pó e de chama de estrelas, se eu não acredito nisso pra mim também. seria hipocrisia, tô ciente disso. então tenho tentado mudar. tenho tentado costurar essa vida numa tapeçaria coesa. não sei se pra melhor. mas tem sido diferente. ninguém nunca vai saber o quão inconfortável é, o quão errado me sinto aqui nessa pele, e eu nunca vou achar as palavras certas pra dizer tudo o que quero verbalizar, mas tenho certeza que algo está mudando. aos pouquinhos tenho tentado ser amigo desse corpo. e coexistir com mim mesmo. sou, no mínimo, grato por não estar mais naquele lugar onde eu estava: aquele quarto escuro com o sussurro constante que soprava um gélido pavor de meramente existir. em vez disso, tenho pensando em começar a fazer yoga pra tentar amenizar essa dor nas costas. é isso. enfim, aos poucos a gente chega lá.

#me

1 note · View note

leiturasvarias · 10 months ago

Text

George Steiner: "Extraterritorial-em torno da literatura e da revolução da linguagem"

Prefácio

Steiner atribui ao início do Século XX um "recuo da linguagem": diante da barbárie das grandes guerras mundiais as humanidades derrotadas procuram reaprender a linguagem, seja de modos filosóficos, psicológicos ou poéticos. É neste contexto que se compreende um percurso histórico que vai de Russell e Wittgenstein aos círculos linguísticos de Moscovo, à Praga de Kafka.

Nesta revolução da linguagem a pátria desaparece para gerar um "pluralismo linguístico" em que homens como Nabokov, Borges e Beckett justamente se destacam, extraterritoriais porque não pertencendo exclusivamente a uma língua mãe sua que os ancorasse numa cultura específica como anteriormente.

Steiner não segue as sugestões de teor científico de Noam Chomsky quanto à categorização linguística. Prefere ser sensível a propostas como as da tradição fenomenológica de Dilthey e Husserl, e também às reflexões de Heidegger ("a linguagem é a totalidade do ser") e Ricoeur, ou até mesmo a uma reflexão que não dispense as dimensões religiosas ou metafísicas.

"Extraterritorial"

Para os românticos o génio tinha de ser o escritor porque ele encarnava a própria cultura de um povo (a própria língua que intervinha além da familiaridade sonâmbula com ela).

Por outro lado, é no contraste que nasce uma nova inventividade: "só quem não se sente em casa no interior de uma língua pode usá-la como instrumento" (Adorno).

Oscar Wilde é um exemplo notável entre o uso que faz do inglês e do francês. "Raia o absurdo a escassez do que sabemos sobre as relações vitais entre o eros e a linguagem". Nabokov, o mesmo: "O Dom, Lolita, Ada são narrativas que dão conta das relações eróticas entre o locutor e a linguagem". Por ser extraterritorial, Nabokov é um porta-voz do seu tempo.

"Matizes e escrúpulos"

O génio de Beckett é dizer menos, é o despojamento. Antes um escritor exilado da sua língua era um mutilado. Agora é diferente: "Cada vez mais, qualquer acto de comunicação entre seres humanos se assemelha a um acto de tradução". O nosso mundo torna-nos a todos estranhos na nossa própria língua.

Beckett precisa de retrabalhar as palavras como se fossem novas para ele, construindo uma literatura que as transforme em estranhas. "Voltam-me as palavras, e a maneira de as fazer soar".

“Tigres no Espelho”

“Os imitadores curam-nos dos nossos males literários”.

“Borges constrói um antimundo, um espaço totalmente coerente no qual o seu espírito se move com o mais perfeito à-vontade”.

“Borges é um conservador, um guarda de um tesouro de banalidades caducas, um classificador de antigas verdades e conjecturas que transbordam so sótãos da história. Toda esta arquierudição comporta aspectos cómicos e discretamente histriónicos. (…) Borges afirma uma imagem cabalística do mundo, uma metáfora mestra da existência. (…) O Universo é um Grande Livro, cada fenómeno natural e espiritual que nele ocorre possui um sentido. O mundo é um alfabeto imenso. A realidade física, os factos históricos, todas as coisas criadas pelos homens são, por assim dizer, sílabas de uma mensagem contínua. Estamos envolvidos numa rede ilimitada de significações, e cada um dos fios da rede é sede de uma pulsação do ser, que conduz, em última instância, àquilo a que, num conto enigmático e dotado da força mais extrema, Borges chama o Aleph. (…) É a roda da visão de Ezequiel, mas também o pequeno pássaro silencioso do misticismo sufi, que de certo modo contém todos os pássaros”.

“O edifício da arte de Borges apresenta falhas severas. Só uma vez Borges criou uma mulher verosímil”.

“O espaço de acção em que um personagem de Borges se move é mítico, e nunca social”.

“Apelo ao massacre”

“A logorreia é a condição de possibilidade da escrita de Céline, ao mesmo tempo que define as suas limitações. Foi um grande mestre das palavras, mas, por outro lado, estas também o dominaram”.

A sua linguagem torrencial comporta uma dinâmica autónoma, uma estranha vida interior mais forte, (…) quase que poderíamos dizer autista”.

“O animal que fala”

“A significação é a estrutura fundamental das formas naturais. (…) Quase qualquer fenómeno pode ser lido e classificado como uma proposição. (…) A vida desenvolve-se através de uma incessante rede de sinais” e sobreviver passa por saber lê-los.

“Toda a identidade é uma proposição activa. (…) Somos na medida em que podemos enunciar-nos e confiamos na nossa existência quando outras identidades captam os nossos sinais de vida e lhe respondem (…) Linguagem e homem existem correlativamente, implicam-se e requerem-se mutuamente. (…) A humanidade é uma função da linguagem.”

“A história é uma rede de linguagem lançada para trás. (…) Não podemos proibir o que não podemos nomear. (…)” Várias lendas antigas baseiam-se num encontro em que os participantes precisam de se nomear ou lutam para conhecer os seus nomes: Jacob e o anjo, Édipo e a esfinge, Rolando e Oliveiros—a alteridades é a descoberta do nome do outro.

“Até quando nos mantemos em silêncio, a linguagem continua em actividade, e o nosso cérebro é como uma caixa de ressonância. Através da comunicação linguística conhecemos o outro e a nossa própria existência.” Kafka dizia que os homens podiam sobreviver ao canto das sereias mas nunca ao seu silêncio. Daí a importância de no monoteísmo Deus se apresentar como ‘eu sou o que sou’ e o neoplatonismo e o gnosticismo levarem mais longe a ideia com o logos criador e a nossa participação na invenção do mundo ao nomeá-lo. “A partir do momento que pensamos em termos verbais, não podemos aceder a um estado de coisas anterior à palavra”.

“Nenhum outro autor exprimiu mais aberta e sinceramente do que Kafka a resistência que a linguagem opõe à verdade, ou a impossibilidade de uma comunicação autêntica entre seres humanos”.

Os círculos de Viena e de Praga intuem o fim do humanismo. Karl Kraus cheirava uma nova Idade Média e Kafka um novo holocausto. Nada disto se pode separar da crise da linguagem que esta gente sente. O círculo de Moscovo junta-se à crise e todos os trabalhos de investigação linguística (venham eles de Russell ou de Wittgenstein, ou dos filósofos de Cambridge) reflectem nos primeiros 25 anos do Século XX a imensa crise da linguagem presente.

“Podemos distribuir a história da filosofia entre as epistemologias que privilegiam a natureza substancial, a verificação e a objectividade concreta da experiência humana, e as que privilegiam a totalidade criadora ou limitada dos seus próprios meios de expressão [os meios de expressão da experiência humana, entenda-se]—ou seja, as epistemologias que sustentam que o homem apreende a realidade e se representa a si próprio na medida e nos termos em que isso lhe é permitido pela linguagem (ou talvez pela língua particular em que pensa). (…) O platonista centra-se na designação, na faculdade compulsiva que o homem detém de registar e reconhecer o mundo em termos de nomenclaturas e definições estabelecidas. (…) A escolástica identifica frequentemente o ser com o enunciado. (…) Representam a tentativa de recuperação da semântica do Éden, da coincidência perfeita entre a palavra e o objecto, antes de Babel. (…) É também aqui que vai a filosofia da linguagem, posterior a Nietzsche, menos dada a conceder a importância a outras disciplinas, como a política, a estética, a ética e a metafísica na sua versão tradicional.

Vale a pena ir mais longe: Benjamin Lee Whorf dizia que “as formas de pensamento de uma pessoa são governadas por padrões inexoráveis das quais a pessoa em causa não tem consciência. Esses padrões são sistematizações complexas e imperceptíveis da sua própria língua”. A comparação com outras torna-as mais visíveis. Diz agora Steiner de novo: “a imagem do mundo que a pessoa possui é uma função linguística”. No fundo, só pensamos o que falamos (o que não podemos falar, não pensamos). “Diferentes línguas geram e programam diferentes formas de vida”. Todas as línguas geram compreensões da vida e todas as línguas são limitadas: “não há língua, por mais amplo que seja o seu vocabulário, ou por mais original e subtil a sua gramática, que organize a totalidade potencial da experiência”. A sintaxe indo-europeia participa na importância que têm ideias como o tempo como fluxo vectorial, a causalidade sequencial e o conceito da irredutibilidade do indivíduo. “Aprender outra língua é abrir uma nova janela sobre a paisagem do ser”.

Lacan tenta aplicar Freud à linguagem. Lacan é um “ultra-nominalista: é o mundo das palavras que cria as coisas”.

“Poderemos considerar a métrica um substituto da lógica? (…) Haverá línguas mais dotadas do que as outras?”

“As políticas totalitárias—sejam fascistas, estalinistas ou tribais—visam impor o seu controlo sobre a linguagem (têm por intuito dominar o corpo e a alma do ser humano). Vida significa morte, liberdade significa servidão absoluta, a paz significa guerra. (…) De maneira menos assassina, a linguagem da publicidade e das tecnocracias consumistas também mentem. Ficamos “rodeados por milhões de palavras absolutamente vazias de sentido. (…) É uma inflação das formas expressivas, estereótipos e lugares-comuns. (…) Na civilização do telefone (rádio, tv, cinema) falamos mais e dizemos menos, ouvimos mais e escutamos menos.” Em 600 mil palavras no inglês, bastam mil para assegurar 75% das conversas telefónicas. A escola valoriza cada vez menos a memória verbal, já não sendo nós capaz de recitar uma poesia de cor. A abolição de tabus verbais enfraquece a nossa dimensão poética e erótica. A linguagem esvazia-se, a palavra retira-se. “Se a linguagem perder parte da sua energia, o homem tornar-se-á menos humano”.

As línguas dos homens

Noam Chomsky notabilizou-se reagindo contra o comportamentalismo de Skinner: “a dinâmica da comunicação humana emerge do interior”. A gramática é interiorizada por cada pessoa, e o “uso espontâneo e inovador da linguagem é qualquer coisa de que certo modo define o homem”, sem comparação com o que acontece entre os animais.

“Por volta da viagem do Século XX, a matemática e a lógica conheceram uma fase de auto-análise rigorosa, tentando definir fundamentos consistentes e intermanete coerentes para os processos de raciocínio e de cálculo. (…) Chomsky propôs-se aplicá-los no tratamento do material muito mais recalcitrante e diversificado do discurso humano efectivo.” Aproxima-se de uma visão de uma estrutura profunda e de como a localizar na nossa experiência de articular esses conceitos: “a existência de ideias inatas ou de programas inatos para toda a experiência potencial” (uma espécie de regresso às categorias a priori de Kant, para interagir com o mundo exterior).

No fundo, Chomsky será acusado de cair também numa espécie de determinismo da “fixação radiosa dessa língua única falada por Adão e pelos seus filhos, mas que se perderia para sempre, reduzida a pó, em Babel”.

Linguagem e Poética

Há línguas sem literatura mas não há literatura sem língua: "os poemas não se fazem com ideias mas com palavras".

"Em sociedades políticas, nas quais as artes do governo e da administração eram em grande medida artes da persuasão através do discurso, o poeta era o exemplo supremo da eficiência da linguagem".

Na natureza da linguagem fala-se na "concepção platónica da mimese e do modelo aristotélico da catarse". "A resposta de Aristóteles funda-se num sentido menos penetrante da linguagem, e procede a uma identificação precipitada da forma e do conteúdo explícito".

Pincelada histórica: a) "os gramáticos medievais e renascentistas sabiam que o grande escritor é um técnico, um artesão que mobiliza competências profundas que, com o tempo, virão a ser compreensíveis". b) no Século XVIII, os neoclássicos procuram a "expressão adequada" para o que fosse vivido. Interessava o conteúdo claro: aquilo que não é explicitamente dito não existe (Samuel Johnson) c) a partir do Século XIX, com a linguística e a filosofia da linguagem, sublinha-se a complexidade dessa mesma linguagem (Coleridge)—círculo de Moscovo, depois o de Praga (Jakobson)

"O movimento psicanalítico foi essencialmente uma investigação dos hábitos linguísticos" (ex: Piaget).

"Uma verdadeira investigação do sentido é uma análise gramatical das capacidades instrumentais da linguagem" (Wittgenstein, Kafka, Rilke).

No Manifesto de Praga: "só a poesia torna possível a experiência do acto linguístico na sua totalidade e faz surgir diante de nós a linguagem, não como sistema estático e pré-estabelecido, mas como energia criadora" (ciência de signos, semiologia).

Existe ou não uma verdadeira ciência linguística? "Foi a nossa consciência da complexidade que se aprofundou". "A nossa concepção da literatura tornou-se mais rica e mais provisória.

Num tempo tecnologicamente mais acelerado, importa reflectir sobre a natureza cinética da poesia.

"Serão as diferentes línguas maneiras radicalmente diferentes de organização e experiência da realidade? Ou será que as bases de todas as línguas constituem um conjunto finito de universais inatos (Harris, Chomsky)?" Ao olharmos para a prática diferente da linguagem nas suas expressões linguísticas diferentes, escolhemos enfatizar o modo como cada uma constrói a sua diferença ou as semelhanças que entre elas existem para sermos mais crentes num ideal de tradução capaz?

"A língua inglesa que se fala e escreve hoje em Inglaterra é uma versão hirta e fatigada quando comparada com a agilidade quase isabelina do inglês da América e da irradiação à escala mundial da sua literatura".

Numa Pós-Cultura

A leitura feita num quadro de intimidade e ócio, beneficiada pelo silêncio privado, um luxo da industrialização (burguesia do Séc. XIX). Era preciso o livro dar de si e o leitor dar de si. O leitor precisava de ter vocabulário e de ser refinado pela elite. Ele confiava na "identificação helenística entre palavra e o espírito, e na ideia", esperava por clareza, consolidava-se a mimese, a correspondência entre as representações verbais e o mundo. "A Enciclopédia é o monumento maior desta confiança mimética". Hoje essa estrutura acusa erosão. A leitura silenciosa e privada torna-se solipsista. O ensino em massa coloca em causa esse optimismo porque um novo analfabetismo generalizado surge. A palavra faliu (Kafka, Celan, Beckett). Talvez se os mestres forem expulsos se possa recuperar através da valorização autoral do leitor? O próprio romance clássico parece ter morrido, sendo a literatura de n��o-ficção muito mais viçosa.

"A filosofia do discurso lírico e dramático em Kierkegaard e Nietzsche—o mimo directo, a dramatização de argumentos abstractos—exerceu uma influência subterrânea, mas cada vez mais forte, sobre todo o espectro das formas linguísticas". As obras híbridas triunfam.

Linhas de Vida

Vivemos uma grande revolução tecnológica desde a década de 50, correspondente à dimensão que o modelo galilaico teve e depois o cartesiano. Valorizamos agora disciplinas "relacionais", e "estamos menos persuadidos de que os factos possuam uma estabilidade independente, imune às variações do nosso espírito sob a influência da cultura e da linguagem". Desde o Século XVI que se faz um caminho em que a ciência é mais atenta da "textura intrincada da experiência, da multiplicidade enovelada e entrelaçada das relações que se tramam entre o espírito humano, a linguagem e o conhecimento dos fenómenos do mundo real".

"O que vem agora em primeiro lugar é a interpretação dos processos vitais como sistemas de armazenamento, codificação e transmissão de informação. Daí, a significativa coincidência do vocabulário entre a linguística e a biogenética, e a ideia compartilhada pelas duas disciplinas de que o prodígio essencial da matéria viva não está no funcionamento mecânico, mas no sentido". Rejeita-se a falácia do atomismo (pode ser feita a análise dos componentes, claro, mas qualquer isolamento funciona como uma ficção necessária).

#georgesteiner #extraterritorial

0 notes

jgmail · 2 months ago

Text

Lovecraft: racionalismo fantástico

Por Jean Montalte

Traducción de Juan Gabriel Caro Rivera

Con motivo de la publicación, el 17 de octubre, de un nuevo volumen de la prestigiosa colección Pléiade dedicado a los “relatos” de H-P Lovecraft, Jean Montalte se adentra de nuevo en la obra del maestro del horror literario, que considera nada menos que una “crítica de la razón pura” a la altura de la obra de Kant, explicándonos el por qué de ello.

“En la noche clara de la nada de la angustia se muestra por fin la manifestación originaria del ser como tal: a saber, que existe el ser y no la Nada”.

Heidegger, ¿Qué es la metafísica?

Me desperté en un estado lamentable. Era como si mis entrañas se hubieran enzarzado en una guerra interna, desgarrando lo más íntimo de mi ser con una furia sin origen, sin causa, sin motivo. El agudo dolor, más allá de lo que era capaz de concebir, me acosaba tanto y tan bien que, cuando por fin y bruscamente se desvaneció, por un momento me pareció recuperar no la salud, sino la vida. Al otro lado de la tumba, en ese pliegue, algo acecha al alma y al cuerpo para darse un festín. El azar indica la presa, a no ser que se trate de algún humor lascivo con miasmas astutamente exhalados. Recibí una invitación a una “gran fiesta”. Mientras me dirigía – era el final de mis estudios secundarios – a la casa que acogía a los invitados, situada en el confín del mundo conocido, la sombra de mis sueños se extendía hasta donde alcanzaba la vista, como si se repitieran ad infinitum, como el copo de Koch, un fractal de destino físico. Además de información práctica sobre cómo llegar al lugar, la invitación por correo electrónico incluía una enigmática afirmación: “No existe un más allá de esta casa, porque empuja hacia atrás los límites del mundo, expandiendo sus dimensiones indefinidamente. Se traga el mundo, lo digiere y, poco a poco, extiende sobre él su propia noche, total y vacía”. Esta invitación bastó para poner patas arriba todo mi sistema nervioso, como el cumplimiento de un deseo que, sin embargo, se consideraba quimérico y vano. La vida, antaño poblada de evanescentes cavilaciones, parecía salir de su inconsistencia para proporcionarme lo que deseaba por encima de todo. La apreciada y mimada lujuria llegaba a su fin, algo que me encantaba. A menos que todo esto fuera muy exagerado, una pequeña y fugaz ebullición de partículas elementales...

La Pléiade

La publicación del primer volumen titulado Récits de l'œuvre de Lovecraft en la biblioteca de la Pléiade ha sido anunciada – ¡por fin! – para el 17 de octubre. El último número de Metal Hurlant está dedicado a él. Se han hecho innumerables adaptaciones de sus cuentos, las dos más recientes, que yo sepa, son Colour Out of Space, protagonizada por Nicolas Cage, y la versión animada, mediante inteligencia artificial, del cuento Dagon por la revista Rage Culture, que se describe a sí misma como “un colectivo que destila una visión prometeica y aceleracionista del mundo”. En otras palabras, Lovecraft es muy actual, lo cual es mucho decir para un escritor tan intemporal como sin duda lo es el recluso de Providence.

No es estrictamente una exégesis de la obra de Lovecraft lo que propongo aquí, sólo algunas consideraciones en torno y a partir de Lovecraft, en torno y a partir de lo que nos hace pensar. Por eso me permito incursiones un tanto heterodoxas en temas que, sin embargo, eran consustanciales a su visión del mundo, como esta comparación entre sus ficciones fantásticas y la Crítica de la razón pura de Kant; una confrontación con el silencio monumental, no el silencio que llena los espacios infinitos que espantan a Pascal con su oscuridad, sino el silencio que nos imponen los límites del lenguaje, cuyo alcance total comprendió Wittgenstein. Porque el silencio – dice George Steiner en su libro Lenguaje y silencio – que rodea en todo momento al propio discurso, le parece a Wittgenstein una ventana más que un muro. Con Wittgenstein, como con ciertos poetas, nos sumergimos más allá del lenguaje en la luz y no en la oscuridad. Cualquiera que lea el Tractatus es sensible a su extraño y mudo resplandor. Por mi parte, creo que la escritura de Lovecraft posee virtudes similares, aunque por medios distintos y en un orden muy diferente al que estos dos filósofos distinguieron en el curso de sus investigaciones.

¿Realismo fantástico?

Jacques Bergier fue el primero en infectar a Francia con el virus Lovecraft, según Houellebecq. Colocó su obra en una categoría hecha a la medida de este creador de mitos: el realismo fantástico. Romain Estorc lo resume así en un notable artículo titulado Lovecraft écrivain, contribution à l’ouvrage collectif Les mythes de Lovecraft, publicada por Ynnis, que tiene el mérito de tomarse en serio la dimensión literaria del maestro del horror cósmico, algo más raro de lo que se cree: “Fue con Le Matin des magiciens, libro de culto de Louis Pauwels y Jacques Bergier publicado en 1960, cuando apareció la expresión réalisme fantastique (realismo fantástico). Esta densa obra era un fenómeno de la contracultura que pretendía no ilustrar el mundo sobrenatural a través de la creación artística de ficción, sino aportar pruebas de la influencia de lo irracional y lo fantástico como fuerzas que actúan sobre nuestra realidad, percibida de forma incompleta por nuestras conciencias supuestamente no despiertas. En el prefacio de su ensayo, los autores hablan de ‘ultraconciencia’ y ‘conciencia superior’. Entre otras referencias, invocan a Howard Philips Lovecraft, presentado como una especie de profeta, un visionario, ¡inspirado por las criaturas cuyos horrores relata!” Una interpretación esotérica, incluso mediúmnica, que Lovecraft, ferviente racionalista, sin duda habría repudiado, pues nunca creyó en la realidad de la mitología que produjo su imaginación creadora.

Me parece, en consonancia con las propias declaraciones de Lovecraft, que tal categoría – realismo fantástico – no es en absoluto apropiada para él. De hecho, como S.T. Joshi, autor de la biografía de referencia que todo lovecraftiano que se precie debería tener en su biblioteca, nos recuerda: “Como ateo, consideraba su ascendencia, especialmente por parte de padre, como ‘rebosante de eclesiásticos pero escasa en pensadores racionales’”. De su herencia en general, declara: “Ningún filósofo – ningún artista – ni ningún escritor – ni una sola maldita alma con la que potencialmente pudiera conversar sin aburrirme mortalmente”. Houellebecq, en su monografía sobre el autor, H.P. Lovecratf Contre le monde, contre la vie, dice de la relación de Lovecraft con la religión: “Considera las religiones como otras tantas ‘dulces ilusiones’, convertidas en obsoletas por el progreso del conocimiento. En sus períodos de excepcional buen humor, hablará del ‘círculo encantado’ de la creencia religiosa; pero es un círculo del que se siente, en cualquier caso, desterrado”. Y, aún más decisiva, su relación con su propia mitología: “Lo primero que me sorprendió al descubrir a Lovecraft fue su absoluto materialismo; a diferencia de muchos de sus admiradores y comentaristas, nunca consideró sus mitos, sus teogonías, sus ‘razas antiguas’ como otra cosa que creaciones puramente imaginarias”. Todas estas razones, así como las muchas profesiones de fe racionalista que se encuentran en sus escritos, me llevan a sustituir el término realismo fantástico por racionalismo fantástico, que me parece más apropiado para el espíritu con el que Lovecraft escribió sus obras de ficción terrorífica.

Aplastando a los intelectuales

La obra fantástica de Lovecraft es una Crítica de la Razón Pura en el mismo sentido que la de Kant, es decir, que advierte al hombre, tan propenso a forjar quimeras metafísicas para tranquilizarse sobre su lugar en el universo. Ciertamente, Lovecraft no desarrolla, como Kant, una teoría del conocimiento destinada a protegernos contra los desafortunados deslices de la razón cuando se aventura en territorios a los que no tiene acceso. De hecho, Kant describe la metafísica como “un campo de batalla” donde tienen lugar “interminables guerras” entre doctrinas rivales, luchas interminables, sin esperanza y sin victoria. No, Lovecraft envía sus masas de materia compacta, sus ensamblajes de electrones, Chtulhu, Dagon, y otras criaturas repugnantes, para aplastar al Hombre, y en particular a los intelectuales (antropólogos, arqueólogos, ingenieros, profesores de economía política, etc.), para recordarles que su pretensión de ocupar un lugar central en el universo es una pura usurpación. En resumen, Lovecraft envía quimeras, puros productos de su imaginación, para erradicar las quimeras de la razón... Como todo buen racionalista – y Kant es un ejemplo típico – acaba humillando a la razón, la única autoridad en la que confía, cuando hace afirmaciones desorbitadas. En la revista Time del 11 de junio de 1973, el crítico Philip Herrera afirmaba acertadamente, y esto puede servir de complemento a lo anterior: “Él [Lovecraft] sabía bien que el verdadero terror reside en la tensión entre el racionalismo de nuestra era científica y nuestra sensación primordial de impotencia, de estar enredados en algo vasto, inexplicable y formidablemente malévolo. Por esta razón evita los viejos hombres lobo y vampiros en favor de un horror más íntimo”.

Lovecraft podría haber suscrito la afirmación de Wittgenstein que cierra el Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: “7. Sobre lo que no se puede hablar, conviene callar”. George Steiner explica que esta afirmación “no es una afirmación del potencial de la filosofía tal como la concebía Descartes. Al contrario, es una retirada radical de la autoridad de la metafísica clásica. [...] Wittgenstein quería clasificar la mayoría de los géneros tradicionales de la especulación filosófica como inexplicables (lo que él llamaba místicos). El lenguaje sólo puede desempeñar un papel pleno en un dominio especial y restringido de la realidad. El resto, y probablemente la mayor parte, es silencio”. Pero Lovecraft sustituyó los abominables aullidos de Cthulhu por el silencio que exige la humillación de no ser nada. Sin embargo, el uso intensivo del término “indecible” podría indicar que Lovecraft es un místico en el sentido en que el filósofo austriaco utiliza el término en su Tractatus: “6.522. Hay, ciertamente, lo inexpresable, lo que se muestra a sí mismo; esto es lo místico”. Pero tampoco nos muestra nada, porque no hay nada que mostrar en un mundo donde nada tiene sentido. Sus criaturas son siempre “indescriptibles”, los horrores que pueblan su mundo “indecibles” y los seres humanos son insignificantes racimos de células dentro de un gigantesco Caos. Esta es sin duda la razón del éxito de Lovecraft: su mundo es nuestro mundo... Nada parece tener sentido y nos aplastan los monstruos. El caos pulula en el silencio de Dios. “Caos” (Chaos) se ha escrito durante mucho tiempo “cahot”, lo que subraya su naturaleza de movimiento constante. Nos movemos en vano, presa de lúgubres enjambres, sin intención ni destino. ¿Podemos comprender el significado de tanto silencio, de tanta noche, de tanto caos? Según Gilbert Durand, autor de Structures anthropologiques de l'imaginaire, “semánticamente hablando, podemos decir que no hay luz sin oscuridad, mientras que lo contrario no es cierto: la noche tiene una existencia simbólica autónoma”. Esto es lo que Lovecraft sabía instintivamente, desde toda la eternidad cósmica que le vio nacer.

#literatura #h p lovecraft #lovecraft #historia #pensamiento #horror #horror cósmico

3 notes · View notes

itsgerges · 5 days ago

Text

Best Regards

The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field

1- Preface

2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?

3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection

4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System

5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?

6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data

7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves

1- Preface

My theory tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field moreover there's NO gravitational field) – and because the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- this article uses the gravitational waves reflection as a method to prove my theory – that's why the article tile is (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field)

Let's refer to my theory before to prove by using the gravitational waves reflection

(i)

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion creates waves in the space – by that planet motion is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and- planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the sea- by that- the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-

(ii)

AND

In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total (where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit)

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

Shortly

The planets motions energies are unified into unified wave and this wave moves by velocity (205.8 km/s) – means- while the planets revolve around the sun, there's one unified wave revolves around the sun and moves by velocity 205.8 km/s

This unified wave is the gravitational waves

The question is

The scientists discovered waves in the space and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field but why?? because planet motion energy analysis proves the motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves- so the discovered waves are created by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field – also let's prove the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field to support my theory

(iii)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

(e)

THE CONCLUSION

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?

The solar system is created from one energy- and this energy is reflected on each other- for that reason- many planets data are reflected on each other- the energy reflection is seen in different data of planets – let's give 3 examples

Example No. (1)

Planet velocity definition proves planets velocities are reflected on each other –

(v1v2= constant = 322) (my 5th equation)

This equation proves the planets velocities are created in pairs and not individually- means each planet has its complementary – let's prove that

Mercury (47.4 km/s) x Uranus (6.8 km/s) = 322

Venus (35 km/s) x Pluto (4.7 km/s) x 2 = 322

The Earth (29.8 km/s) x Neptune (5.4 km/s) x 2 = 322

Mars (24.1 km/s) x Jupiter (13.1 km/s) = 322

Planet velocity is defined by many rules but our rule is the major one and all other rules depend on it

Clearly the rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are reflected on each other

Example No. (2)

The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – The Earth) tells

Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates Longer orbital distance

(I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus)

The original order was (Mercury – Mars - Venus – The Earth)

This order also tells the same rule (Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates longer orbital distance)

AND

The outer planets order (Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto) tells

Greater diameter necessitates Shorter orbital distance

Clearly the planets orders are reflected on each other

(Uranus diameter is greater than Neptune diameter but Neptune mass is greater – means – the order depends on the planets diameters and not masses)

Example No. (3)

Venus orbital inclination = 3.4 degrees and

Pluto orbital inclination = 17.2 degrees

But sin (3.4 degrees) = (1/17.2)

I try to show that the planets data is reflected on each other but we need to defines which planet data is reflected on which

3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection

Let's see the picture clearly

(a)

we see the planets data are reflected on each other – and we ask – how this data be reflected on each other?

(b)

The planets can't be reflected on each other – why?? because each planet is connected by its orbit- the planets are found in their orbits- the reflection of energy needs freedom in motion- we understand this meaning clearly

For example- I can use a mirror to reflect a light beam but I can NOT control the reflected light beam – the reflected energy moves free in space- here – if the planets are reflected on each other they will leave their orbits because they will be carried by the energy into the reflection direction-

I want to say- the motion in orbit is a feature of the planet – and the reflection is a feature of wave – planet motion can not support the reflection feature because the motion is done in orbit (defined position)

Shortly- the planets can not be reflected on each other

(c)

How can the planets data reflected on each other if the planets can't be reflected on each other? how can their data be reflected?

There are 2 steps to answer this question – I write them in (d) and (e)

(d)

The gravitational waves are reflected- in fact- the gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- please pay attention- we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system

The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn

The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter

The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars

The gravitational waves are reflected and this reflection causes to reflect the planets data on each other

(e)

Why does the gravitational waves reflection cause to reflect the planets data?

The solar planets and distances are created from one energy – means – one cycle of energy is found behind the solar group creation and motion

This is similar to the blood circulation in a creature- the planets are similar to this creature members- the blood moves to this creature liver, kidney, heart and brain each member is similar to a planet- the blood moves through all of them- if this blood is poisoned all of them will be dead- if the blood healthy the members will be strong-

Similar to that

The gravitational waves are reflected and pushes energy in defined direction- each planet data is defined by this energy –and because- some energy moves in direction opposite to other energy (because of the reflection of energy) for that some planets data be reflected on each other-

Please pay attention

We have one energy behind the solar system- the reflection of energy causes part of this energy to move in opposite direction to the other part that causes the data to be reflected on each other and for that some planets data be reflected on other planets data-

The major problem in this explanation is the matter definition- because- the physics book defines the planet as (Planet is a rigid body created independently from the space and the other planets)- this definition is the problem because based on it the data can never be reflected on each other even if the gravitational waves are reflected let's provide a new definition for matter and prove it

Matter Definition

I have discovered (Planet Diameter Is Created Based On A Mathematical Equation) let's see this equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)

Example

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

The equation tells planet diameter is created based on its velocity –means- Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s

The Equation Concept

Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- the fact is that – The necessary requirement for planet safe motion is to create a function between this planet diameter and its orbital distance

BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- the function in this case can't be useful because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result

The designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but the function contains also more variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a planet changes its orbital distance- this planet diameter will not be changed but its rotation period, orbital period, and velocity will be changed and the diameter will be saved-

NOTICE-

Mars is the example for this theory because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one- after Migration Mars changed its motion data but Mars diameter is saved

NOTICE-

Planet diameter equation is very useful to analyze the energy reflection in the solar system because the equation shows the changes in data resulting from the energy reflection- for example- the equation produces the planet orbital inclination-but in Saturn equation- the equation produces the value (0.4) while we know Saturn orbital inclination is 2.5 degrees- the value (0.4) is produced because the energy is reflected in Saturn and that caused effect on the data by that the value (2.5) become (1/2.5)=0.4

Matter Definition (Deep Analysis)

What's The Matter And How Is Created?

The matter and space are created from the same one energy and both move with the motion of this energy from which they are created- but- the matter creates for itself a distinguish form and moves by different velocity from the space motion (notice the gravitational waves prove the space has motion and not static).

This is similar to the sea of water- the space is similar to the sea of water and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page-

The whirlpool (vortex) is created by the sea water and it's carried by the sea water motion- spite of that- the whirlpool is different in its form from the sea waves – also the whirlpool moves by different velocity from the sea waves motion velocity- this example gives explanation for the matter definition- the matter is similar perfectly to the whirlpool on the sea page- it's created by the sea water motion but it has a distinguish form and different velocity from the sea waves-

Also

The whirlpool dimensions depend on the sea water motion features- for example – we have a whirlpool its diameter is 2 meters, this diameter is formed by the sea water motion features (the water velocity- amount-pressure -……etc) that tells the whirlpool is found later after the sea creation- and the water motion is found before the whirlpool creation- this meaning is a fact for the matter creation and dimensions- the matter dimensions are created based on this matter motion- means- the motion is defined before the matter creation- this is proved strongly by my planet diameter equation- the equation tells (for example) Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s- the whirlpool idea explains how the planet matter data is defined based on its motion- because

The original energy was found in motion at first and the planet matter is created from this moving original energy and the planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after the planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data is created that's why the planet data is in full harmony with the planet motion features.

Also the idea shows the planet motion reason- as I proved before- no planet moves by the sun gravity- Newton is wrong- because the planet creation and motion are done by one force only otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it- here we see the planet motion reason- the planet moves with the original energy from which this planet is created

4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System

Please pay attention - we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system

The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn

The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter

The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars

The planets data is reflected according to this table – for that we need to define each reflection in details to see the reflected data between the two planets

5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?

Let's suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field as the physics book tells- the waves are reflected and caused changes for the planets data- as I prove in the next point- that means – the gravitational waves provides new energy for the planets which caused the planets data to be effected by the gravitational waves reflection- this will add new energy for these planets and the whole solar system-

This is similar to the rains on Earth- we know- the rains is vaporized water from the seas and rivers and this vaporized water is found in the clouds which cause the rains

Means- we don't imagine the water is found in the sky by itself – and we don't think the rains water is new water found in the sky without water vaporization from the seas and rivers- because- if the rain water is found in the sky by itself without vaporization for the seas water that will add new water on the Earth- and that will cause the whole Earth to be drown in water and no ground will be found because the rains add new water to the Earth-

Similar to that- if we suppose- the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field and these waves are reflected and cause effects on the planets data because these waves add new energy for the planets – this new energy will increase the solar system energy – this is a wrong idea- because

No source of energy can cause the continuous increase for the solar system energy

The solar system stability in motion proves no change in energy is found

The planets orbital periods are not changed prove the solar system energy is a stable value has no change

Shortly- the solar system energy is defined stable value of energy moves in a cycle (as the sea water and rains) –

This analysis proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and by that the gravitational waves effect on the planets data is a part of the energy cycle where these waves energy is produced by the planets motions and this energy has effects on these planets shows a complete cycle of energy.

Means

The solar system energy is stable- the reflection of energy causes to accumulate the energy in one point but the energy before the accumulation equal the energy after the accumulation- the reflection causes to accumulate the energy in one point only

The conclusion

The gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (even if found)

6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data

The Data Changes

The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data let's refer to these changes in following

What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.

What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection

The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.

The energy direction is changed by the reflection

The players of the rates of time are reflected also –

Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have seen - the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn– and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets -

These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the data analysis and comparison

Let's see how these changes have effects on the planets data in the next point no. (7)

7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves

Group Data No (I)

(1)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

And

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

(2)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

(3)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–

BUT

The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And

(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

Discussion

(1)

The data shows the following

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference

We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.

That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other – Now let's analyze each reflection individually

(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)

224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)

AND-

680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –

As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)

The orbital periods definition

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We don't discuss the precession cycle here

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)

It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.

(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)

Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

The comparison shows the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because

The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-

Notice - please note clearly – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-