#marriage treatment

[betterlyf]

Best Marriage Counselling In Delhi - BetterLYF

Counselling may be a strange and confusing experience for many couples. Sharing detailed personal facts about yourself and your relationship can be intimidating and stressful. But don’t worry, we provide a safe space with 100% confidentiality. Marriage counselling assists couples in identifying and resolving problems and improving their relationships.

[heterorealism]

[unecoccinellenoire]

the custody battle between Nathalie "Assigned Parent by Ladybug" Sancoeur and Amélie "Actual Blood Relative With Legal Rights" Graham de Vanily would be a fun scenario to explore if it wasn't for the fact that Amélie would probably let Adrien stay in Paris with no adult supervision at all if he told her that was what he wanted.

[wonder-worker]

I've been thinking about the tragedy of Elizabeth Woodville living to see the end of her family name.

I don't mean her family with her husband, which lived on through her daughter and grandson. I mean her own.

Her sisters died, one by one, many of them after 1485. When Elizabeth died, only Katherine was left, and she would die before the turn of the century as well.

All her brothers died, too. Lewis died in childhood. John was executed. Anthony was murdered. Lionel died suddenly in the peak of Richard's reign, unable to see his niece become queen. Edward perished at war. Richard died in grieving peace. For all the violence and judgement the family endured, it was "an accident of biology" that ended their line: none of the brothers left heirs, and the Woodville name was extinguished. We know the family was aware of this. We know they mourned it, too:

“Buy a bell to be a tenor at Grafton to the bells now there, for a remembrance of the last of my blood.”

Elizabeth lived through the deposition and death of her young sons, and lived to see the end of her own family name. It must have been such a haunting loss, on both sides.

[femininedating]

A man you can depend on >>>

[pr1ncessk1tty]

🍒

[henrybelly]

honestly when i tried to figure out why some fans are so mad at ivypool these days i was looking through avos and. the scene where ivypool apologises to twigpaw for not supporting sending a patrol for skyclan is genuinely very sweet??

i actually saw someone characterize this as "ivypool forcing twigpaw to forgive her". is it crack you smoke. is that what you smoke. you smoke crack?

[lipstickhotchocolate]

Based and right

[isekyaaa]

I'm reading a fanfiction currently about a girl that was isekai'd into AoaB with knowledge of everything that's going to happen in the future. It's a very good series of fics, but it's almost painful to get through. Though Myne has so many things going against her, somehow the main character in the fic, Mila, has it worse. Everything she works for she struggles to achieve. Nobody gives her any chances. Nobody is looking out for her. She can escape death and more and nobody will care. It's honestly depressing.

Reading it, I can't help but put myself in Mila's shoes and think how I'd feel if I got isekai'd into a world with knowledge of the future, and despite this, everyone, all the characters I love, treating me like a nuisance and a liability than someone of worth. But at the same time it makes sense. Even if Mila is the main character of the fic, the real main character is Rozemyne. That's who the world circles around. But still, as someone that rooting for Mila reading this, I just want happier things to happen to her.

[axelhasstoppedresponding]

this gay and bisexual (derogatory) have stolen every inch and crumb of my creativity

im not complaining tho honestly

[navree]

people doing this whole "look at how rhaenys acted with corlys's bastard son vs how catelyn acted with jon snow" to demonize one or the other is weird because, like, maybe it's just me, but i think that catelyn and rhaenys had different reactions because they're different people in different situations.

[pocketramblr]

Sorry, I was trying to ask your opinion about the person who asked Katydid about if AFO and Yoichi were step brothers instead of biological. Words are hard and my brain went kaput while typing the question out.

ohhh ok that ask! yeah i think its a fun idea and gentry and i spitballed out some fun things, like:

as yoichi was formerly an only child, he can see afo's early red flags and is like 'ah hell no, he thinks im a new toy called 'baby brother'. im like six months younger than him. and im not gonna be his brother for long, and then hopefully mom and i can forget all about this.' and tries to break his parents up

AfO is aware but isn't letting his family split up, he doesn't care who's by blood or law or what, Yoichi is his little brother now. he definitely locked his parents in a room at one point when it was looking like they'd really divorce, and said he'd only let them out once they promised to stay together. Yoichi sees this early vaulting tendency and wants to scream.

Even when the divorce happens, AfO's like "no, you're still my little brother, what does our parents choices have to do with us?" and yoichi is like "my choice dude. my choice to not be your brother" and uhhh well. vaulting upgrade!

Yoichi warns his lovers that he hesitates to get married because if they become AfO's brothers in law, then he will stop at nothing to vault them too, no matter what happens to their relationship with Yoichi after. they'd be stuck as family with him and Yoichi wouldn't wish that on his most hated enemy, let alone Second and Third

Second and Third are like "come on. there's no way, he hates us and wants us dead, its fine." Yoichi is like "no, really, he's done this before." Second and Third are like "youve been married before???" and Yoichi clears up that he means his mother's marriage to his stepfather, which his stepbrother AfO did not acknowledge the end of.

they didn't send an invite to the wedding, which directly led to:

(Second's fine here btw all his injuries are from throwing himself at AfO and AfO figuring he now has a new slightly sturdier and more rambunctious little brother.)

[fisheito]

i swear i've played a game like that

[plasma-tree]

being a part of a marginalized group does not give you a free pass to target and abuse disabled people.

ableism is still ableism. even if the person being ableist is poc or lgbt. even if it's "just a cultural difference".

we are constantly fucking forgotten or told to be grateful for "what we've been given".

lmao

I live in the US and we have a bare few fucking laws to protect us (disabled people). the rehab act and the ADA are the two that come to mind immediately, and the ADA is barely ever fucking enforced. I was recently refused entry at an urgent care center because I have a service dog. I filed a complaint with the DOJ, which is ALL YOU'RE FUCKING ALLOWED TO DO and I received, in writing;

"We won't be investigating this further".

And every other fucking sd handler I've spoken to in the past TWO YEARS has had the same shit happen; even when we have proof, even when we have video or audio or literal image proof of being discriminated against. even if we have it in WRITING. What happens if you call the police? Nothing. They run with the claim of "we don't enforce federal/civil law". Present them with state law that is equal to or more protective than the ADA? "well that's still a civil law" or an entire refusal to hear or see the law.

we don't even fucking have the right to marriage. We literally do not. Because some of us will lose our insurance and SSDI checks. Which means we will die.

It feels like the whole fucking system is set up to kill us.

[moonmoonthecrabking]

this is a very personal post but fuck it. i would honestly be a lot more inclined to take my mother's non-affirming theology seriously if she didn't say to me in 2022, the same year she was being treated as a historical authority during [redacted], that she didn't believe bisexual men existed. flat out. because... many men in the ancient world were very much what we consider bisexual, and it is a considerable portion of what the new testament clobber passages are based on. so, therefore, i can't take her historical basis of non-affirming theology as true because there are inherent flaws with her understanding of queer identity that mean she's not sufficiently looking at the context of these passages. in my opinion.

of course, i can't say this, because 1. why should i remember that conversation and 2. why should i care.

fuck the [redacted] and fuck any implication that pride is not a necessity, even in progressive countries.