#lolita vladimir nabokov

[punkeropercyjackson]

Jkr called Lolita 'a great and tragic love story' and she's the same person who wrote a 22 year old woman and a 35 year old man as a romance with him rejecting her because he's 'a good guy' but 'giving in' since she kept pursuing him and the narrative playing it as what was best for both of them and she was also his childhood best friend's cousin.Threads

[onlyfangz]

reading lolita for the first time and im mostly shocked at how blatant it is that humbert humbert is a pedophile. dont misunderstand, i knew exactly the plot of lolita before reading lolita, however, considering a good 85-95% of the world's population seems to think that it's a romance story, and with the knowledge that HH is an unreliable narrator, i thought the pedophilia in lolita might have been easy to miss. maybe under layers of subtext you could easily glide over if you were passively reading instead of critically analysing.

but no! humber humbert, even when doing his very best to convince you otherwise, is very clearly and very deliberately a self-centered, egotistical, misogynistic, pretentious, cowardly predator, in his own goddamn words. even if you 100% take his word for everything that happens -- that delores invited his attraction, that charlotte haze was killed in a freak car accident, that all of these women were falling and fawning over him, etc., -- all of those traits still remain to be true, as told by his own hand.

you have to be one of two things to think lolita is a love story, and i hope it's that you're lazy and didn't read the book.

[samandhislostshoe]

if i hear another boy tell me that they relate to humbert because he's 'misunderstood' i swear to god i will become jennifer check

[eccentricallygothic]

if there was a most insufferably despicable narrator award it would go to nabokov's humbert humbert

[addyriley]

reading the book right now & i love 💋

[autismmydearwatson]

Reading Lolita is infuriating enough (obviously) but it's so annoying to have to, every four pages, read about HH bitching about "I take advantage of teenage prostitutes, I hate women and fantasize about raping 12 year old girls........but I'm the oppressed one because society won't let me get away with it 🥺"

[jess-the-hyness]

Something I feel Very Strongly about is the misinterpretation of Lolita, especially Visually. I think it started about 3rd edition, or recently after the first interaction of film came out. Beyond the disaster of producing, it started a flattening of the book and message... The heart shaped glasses and seductive lollipop ("loli-pop" *gags*) just defeats any argue against the harmful nature of what Lolita has groen to. Not a terrifying look into what someone says to justify the worst, but the demonization of the victim.

Anyway, I painted over my copy in a way that I feel doesn't glorify

It's something but a silent protest even still

[skrunksthatwunk]

finished lolita. ough.

[punkeropercyjackson]

'Real intellectuals in fandom love complex ships'And the complexity is rape culture

[rezenra]

Visualizing Obsession: A Comparative Study of Lolita in Literature and Film 

Characterized by an unreliable narrator, intricate wordplay, and an intimate look into the essence of obsession and desire, Nabokov’s Lolita demonstrates inherent challenges for screen adaptation. At the heart of the story lies Humbert Humbert, an adult literature professor who becomes infatuated with his landlady’s daughter, 12-year-old Dolores Haze, whom he nicknames Lolita. In 1997, Adrian Lyne underwent the daunting task of directing a film adaptation of an undeniably controversial novel. Lolita presents larger questions of fidelity to source material and the ethics of problematic representation through the lenses of heart-shaped glasses worn both by an on-screen and in-book Lolita. 

Despite both works sharing the same central narrative—a middle-aged Humbert Humbert's obsessive and sickening relationship with his stepdaughter—they differ significantly in narrative style. The novel features an unreliable protagonist and narrator, whose “baroque language” (Wood 98) serves to highlight his disturbed psyche, mixing seduction with deep disturbing content. This writing style, and the insistence Humbert makes throughout the novel, being that his ���obsession with Lolita and his actions towards her are artistic in nature... as opposed to carnal, bliss” (Quayle 2009), forces readers to grapple with their own moral judgments. Adrian Lyne’s film adaptation on the other hand, adopts a more straightforward visual approach, relying on cinematic techniques to convey drama and emotional tension, as expected with the genre. While the film retains the main plot, it often oversimplifies character motivations and dynamics, presenting a romanticized view that diminishes the depth found in the novel's intimate first-person perspective. This shift in both narrative and aesthetic style impacts how audiences engage with the themes of obsession and manipulation. Scholar Anne W. McNerney argues that the seductive imagery and emotive score can create an aesthetic allure that overshadows the chilling reality of the underlying themes, leading to a potential glamorization of Humbert’s predatory behavior (McNerney 1997). Rather than being an active participant to Lolita’s suffering, audiences instead watch glamourous scenes play out in front of them, illustrating the inherent difficulties of translating such a complex novel to screen. 

Examining the titular character, Lolita, in both the novel and its film adaptation reveals how her multifaceted nature is often sacrificed for dramatic effect. In the novel, Lolita is portrayed as a character with agency, who navigates her traumatic experiences with a unique blend of innocence and cunning. Lolita’s character is presented through Humbert, the story’s unreliable narrator, which highlights her alleged manipulation and leaves readers questioning whether his descriptions are accurate or distorted. This nuance is difficult to illustrate in film, and Lyne’s adaptation appears as if it reduces Lolita to a victim of Humbert’s obsession as opposed to an active participant in her story. Although one can argue this is the accurate interpretation of the story’s events, a key theme in Lolita is the audience’s participation and constant questioning of the narrator. This shift can be attributed to the constraints of cinematic storytelling, where visual representation prioritizes dramatic tension over psychological depth. Focusing on Humbert’s perspective in film would risk perpetuating the very objectification Nabokov critiques (Williams 1995). Ultimately, the responsibility of ethical portrayal is different in film and literature.  

The richness of Nabokov's narrative, along with its psychological depth and moral complexity, is often diluted in the pursuit of cinematic allure. As filmmakers navigate the treacherous waters of adapting sensitive material, they must grapple with the responsibility of representation and the potential repercussions of their choices. There is a necessity for a nuanced approach that honors original text while remaining vigilant about the implications of how such stories are to be viewed by the public. 

--------------

Works Cited 

McNerney, Anne W. "The Trouble with Lolita: Adapting Nabokov for the Screen." Literary Adaptation and the Digital Age, 1997. 

Quayle, Anika Susan. "Lolita Is Dolores Haze: The 'Real' Child and the 'Real' Body in Lolita." Nabokov Online Journal, vol. 3, 2009.  

Williams, Linda. "Viewing the 'Unviewable': Humbert and Lolita." Film Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1995, pp. 4-15. 

Wood, Michael. “The Trees Were Already Blue.” Raritan, vol. 30, no. 1, Summer 2010, pp. 94–101. 

[mollyandthelipstickrose]

Today on horrible remarks from adults I know:

My history & politics teacher calling 'Lolita' by Vladimir Nobakov a "Love story" unironically

[b4byfaced]

current read: Lolita by Vladmir Nabokov 🍒

“You see, she had absolutely nowhere else to go”

[caktusjuice-draws]

Also I am currently reading Lolita, is anyone interested in my very angry character Analysis of Humbert or... should I shut the fuck up?

[virginstoner666]

writing a sequel to lolita- not because there is any conceivable way you could effectively write a continuation of the events of the story, but solely to give it the title LMAOlita

[dizzyadolly]

[autismmydearwatson]