#king of burgundy
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
dreamconsumer · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor.
2 notes · View notes
escapismsworld · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
Built over 1000 years ago, the Château de Santenay is distinguished today by its remarkable roof of glazed tiles.
Once a fortress transformed into a bourgeois residence, it was one of the properties of the Duke of Burgundy, Philippe le Hardi, son of the king of France, Jean II. Today, the Château de Santenay, with its 95 hectares and 18 different appellations, is one of the largest vineyard estates in Burgundy.
116 notes · View notes
illustratus · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Coat of Arms of Edward IV, King of England, in his Capacity as Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece
by Pierre Coustain, c. 1481
243 notes · View notes
sour-alien · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
85 notes · View notes
royalty-nobility · 9 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Philip V , King of Spain
Artist: Jean Ranc Montpellier (Spanish, 1674-1735)
Date: 1723
Medium: Oil on canvas
Collection: Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, Spain
Description
Official portrait of the first monarch of the House of Bourbon in Spain, Philip V (1683-1746). Grandson of Louis XIV (1638-1715), he was born in Versailles and was proclaimed King of Spain in 1700. He married twice, had numerous children and died in Madrid in 1746.
The King wears armour, carries the baton of command and is accompanied by a war helmet placed in front of him on a stone. In addition to the richly embroidered jacket and the red sash around his waist, garments worthy of his status, the Monarch wears the insignia of the Golden Fleece and the band of Saint-Esprit, symbols of his Spanish dominion, as heir to the House of Burgundy, and of his French ancestry.
This composition became the model for the King's official portrait, repeated with few variations countless times by various artists. It is distinguished by its elegance, refinement and distinction, characteristics that are directly linked to French painting of the time and especially to the work of Hyacinthe Rigaud (1659-1743), master of Ranc and court painter to Louis XIV and Louis XV of France.
14 notes · View notes
roehenstart · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Philip the Fair (Philip the Handsome), Lord of the Netherlands. By Louis Gallait.
15 notes · View notes
pardonmydelays · 6 months ago
Text
listening to my broadway playlist and dust and ashes is playing now
11 notes · View notes
game-of-style · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Mysaria of Lys - Elie Saab Fall 2023
71 notes · View notes
burger · 6 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media
Oh burger, Oh burger, How do you taste? I will bite you now burger.. What a taste!
4 notes · View notes
rikabauer · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
13 notes · View notes
Text
MARGARET OF BURGUNDY
MARGARET OF BURGUNDY, QUEEN OF FRANCE
c.1290-1315
Les Rois Maudits (The Accursed Kings)
            Margaret of Burgundy was the Queen of France and Navarre, and was the first wife of King Louis X and I. She was a princess of the House of Burgundy, the oldest daughter of Robert II Duke of Burgundy an Anges of France (who was the youngest daughter of Louis IX of France). In 1305, Margaret married her cousin Louis I and had their daughter Joan.
            In 1314, the Tour de Nesle affair was revealed, it was a well-known scandal for the French royal family. The daughters-in-law of King Philip IV, Margaret, Blanche, and Joan were all accused of adultery. The three women were said to have conducted their affairs with Norman knights in a tower in Paris.
            It was Isabella of France (wife of King Edward II of England) who became a witness against those involved in the affair. Isabella had given her sisters-in-law a purse, the Norman knights were found in possession of them after the three ladies had given it to them as a gift The affair was exposed and the knights were tortured and then executed.
            Margaret, Blanche, and Joan were found guilty and imprisoned. Margaret spent the last two years of her life in prison. The women were imprisoned in poor conditions and mistreated, which resulted Margaret catching a virus and passing away. She died aged 24 or 25. Joan’s paternity became in doubt after the affair.  
            Margaret of Burgundy is one of the characters in Les Rois Maudits (The Accursed Kings) by Maurice Druon and was portrayed in the miniseries 1972 and 2005.
Tumblr media
#margaretofburgundyqueenoffrance #margaretofburgundy #lesroismaudits #theaccursedkings #mauricedruon
3 notes · View notes
dreamconsumer · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Hugues the Great (897-956) crowns Raoul or Rodolphe of Burgundy (circa 890 - 936), Duke of Burgundy and King of France. Unknown artist.
4 notes · View notes
thefreelancehistorywriter · 2 years ago
Text
Margaret of Austria is Shipwrecked and King Henry VII of England Writes to Her at Southampton – 1497
Probably by Pieter van Coninxloo Diptych: Philip the Handsome and Margaret of Austria about 1493-5 https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/GROUP20 When King Charles VIII of France put into motion his plans to extend his power basis into Italy, he attacked Naples which belonged to the sphere of influence of King Ferdinand of Aragon. Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I concluded an anti-French…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
14 notes · View notes
illustratus · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Die Nibelungen: Siegfried (1924) directed by Fritz Lang
54 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 1 year ago
Note
how do you think the Lancasters stood the best chance at winning the war?
Imo, if they'd won at Mortimer's Cross or Towton, the Yorkists would be finished.
A lot of the WotR depended on military victories, tbh. We tend to get distracted by fancy discussions like "Who had the best claim?"* or Propaganda Roulette 101, but the fact remains that it was ultimately military victories that sealed the deal and got rid of opposition**. Everything else was pretty wrapping on top of the already-won or to-be-won prize.
*The most useless debate of all **The exception was Richard III's usurpation but that was a fairly unconventional and entirely unexpected usurpation, and in any case it was a military defeat that ended his reign.
#ask#wars of the roses#Remember that the Yorkists were on the brink of total defeat by the end of 1460#The Duke of York and his second son were killed; and his heir was only 18; the King would soon be reclaimed from their grasp#If they'd lost in 1461 their cause would most likely be over#A fairly analogous example would be the Battle of Bosworth - if Richard III had won Henry Tudor's cause would be finished#(and he'd probably be dead)#If the Lancastrians had seized London they'd have a huge advantage but might also encounter some difficulties#including a potential siege and hostility from the aldermen and public. But a military victory would seal the deal#Also I think I've mentioned in some tags before but imo it's clear that the Lancastrians stood a monumentally better chance at#consolidating their power/support/reputation if they won in 1461 rather than 1471#A 1471 military victory would result in victory but would also bring with it a whole host of other problems in terms of consolidation#(Among others: the inevitable head-on national clash between Yorkist and Lancastrian lords in terms of forfeited and restored estates#which had been postponed by Warwick but would undoubtedly take center stage once the royal family was properly established#and would almost definitely result in the eruption of widespread rivalries and resentment from the affected parties;#foreign and domestic policy with regards to the promised war with Burgundy which was very unpopular with the English patriciate; etc)#(That's not even getting into whether Warwick would survive or not and the equally complicated possibilities in either scenario#or George of Clarence: whether their victory would be before or after he switched sides and what that would mean for him)#There's also the obvious fact that Henry VI would still ultimately be King - and that can take VERY different routes depending#on the wider situation#In a completely alternate scenario if they had established themselves when Edward IV was still in exile he would be out of reach#which would over-complicate matters even further#(I'd be personally curious to know if they took any action against royal claims through the female line considering this was a HUGE#aspect of their gendered propaganda in the 1460s to try and delegitimize the Yorkist claim...Henry IV gave them an obvious precedent)#a 1471 victor would also be devastating on a personal level for everyone involved considering Henry's imprisonment and#Margaret and Edward's almost decade-long exile before it#It would be significantly more devastating for Edward IV's widow and four frighteningly young children - especially considering#that unlike Margaret or Anne Neville they lacked the active/direct connection of powerful foreign or national relatives#All in all - It's difficult to say but it's clear that a path forward in 1471 would be tremendously hard#A victory in 1461 would not only forever end the Yorkist challenge but would also ensure a far smoother aftermath for the Lancasters
2 notes · View notes
styleasia · 4 months ago
Text
0 notes