#jeffrey richards

[astoundingbeyondbelief]

Possible electoral map for the 2020 presidential election in Red, White, and Royal Blue, in which Democratic President Ellen Claremont secures a second term by defeating Senator Jeffrey Richards (R-UT). This is for the book; I broke down the movie's electoral map here.

Naturally, we aren't told how every single state voted, but here are the facts:

Claremont wins Illinois, Virginia, Colorado, Michigan, Pennsylvania, California, and Texas.

Richards wins Iowa, Utah, Montana, Florida, and Nevada.

When CNN calls Texas for Claremont, she reaches 301 electoral votes, with seemingly only Alaska still uncalled. Since only one Democratic president has ever won there, I gave it to Richards.

In both versions of the story, Claremont's home state of Texas is decisive, voting Democratic for the first time since 1976. Implausible? Sure, but author Casey McQuiston grew in up Louisiana and has talked about how "[i]t's so exhausting to see mainstream liberal media write red states off as a lost cause," so I get it. If you had to pick a Deep South state to flip in 2019, the year the book was published, Texas wasn't a bad bet. And of course a Deep South state did flip in the real 2020 election - Georgia.

[stromuprisahat]

A picture: Senator Jeffrey Richards’s stupid Sam the Eagle face on CNN, talking about his grave concern for President Claremont’s ability to remain impartial on matters of traditional family values due to the acts her son engages in on the sacred grounds of the house our forefathers built. Followed by: Senator Oscar Diaz, responding via satellite, that President Claremont’s primary value is upholding the Constitution, and that the White House was built by slaves, not our forefathers.

Red, White & Royal Blue (Casey McQuiston)

[idealuk]

My tipsy ass having a very ACD moment: There's a reason why I don't get credit that I would otherwise deserve. Media never implements what is my superior-to-what-they-actually-do ideas for storylines. Before the movie came out, and after I found out that they were combining Rafael and Liam in to one character for the film, I openly hypothesized that he would be a rogue Embed with the Richards campaign [I grew up in a vastly-economically-diverse suburb of D.C., so our public school curriculum was geared towards leading us to careers in politics/journalism and/or activism, therefore, before doing a deep dive on Taylor, I, not only already knew that occupation existed, but had the preliminary skills to be one (tangent within a tangent: to those of you from Minnesota whom complained about that electoral map unbelievably having you be red, I feel you, because I can't see a way where my purple state of Virginia would've gone blue in that election, then again, Virginia Is For Lovers (tangent within a tangent within a tangent: it will never make sense to me how that motto isn't actually because of Loving Vs. Virginia as that legalized interracial marriage across the country especially as the then-surviving member of the precedent-setting couple, Mildred Loving, was even vocally pro-gay-marriage when that battle arose)). Taylor was on a whole show about said job profession (see his character explain what one is here at 1:27), and that way the character would still be viewed as good/moral like Rafael and Liam are in the book, but, no, media can never utilize my good theories and they made Miguel a conniving asshole. I'm not actually complaining about the choices made as it would have been difficult to make such a peripheral character as Jeffrey Richards a bad guy in the length of a movie about a queer love story (though, come on, modern-day Republican - does it really need any exposition?) and it needed more drama than the blatantly apparent austerity of the crown and queerphobia. There was just a cleaner way to out the boys with out villainizing an openly queer character.

*Goes back to remembering that you don't want to hear from me today and continuing to hate self-aggrandizing Miguel with you*

[t0bey]

three of them!!!

[ronironiica]

My inspiration

[k-i-l-l-e-r-b-e-e-6-9]

[ihatekillerstans]

dont simp for killers

they killed people and you never could have changed them

[valupuyhol]

😍🖤😍🖤😱😱

OMG DAMN Izzy’s voice is sooo perfect!!!!

I leave you here a pure freaking gem, a small segment of a rare interview by Izzy and the Juju Hounds💫

YEAR: 1992

@rocknrollflames @izzystradlindoesitforme @izzystradliniscute @jakelinestradlin @itryandfeelthesunshine @beebemarie @liveinalovelyway @hi1234hehe @guns-n-roses-gal @greeneyezblackheart @nenynra @prettypersuasion @glamwitchyb @delusionsandrainbows @midnight-alibi @izzydeanstradlin @cel3brity-skin @unknownperson246

[giunass94]

American Horror Story Criminals

vs

Real Criminals

Jeffrey Dahmer

John Wayne Gacy

Aileen Wuornos

Tate Langdon ispired by Eric Harris & Dyaln Klebold

Richard Ramirez

Dr. Oliver Thredson inspired by Ed Gein

Charles Manson

[milton-dammers]

Vannacutt deserves more glory because he is underrated!!

Everyone forgot about him.

[anonsiruyu]

I'm back! \о/ My sister advised me to resume my activity here. :) Cinderella IdentityV

[stickyvoidkitty]

[hydefever]

might as well post this silly redraw here

i have an attachment to both of these guys

bonus where i was experimenting with making jeff’s hair more like fur

[calvinandhobbes]

jeffrey levine / kristen stewart / richard hugo

[kissoflightning]

DBH Characters When Somebody Knocks On The Bathroom Door

Seen this meme done before, but wanted to do it with just the human characters.

[dreaming-of-barbi]

That's so fucked up that people are romantizing Franco, because even Red Barrels are showing him as a total creep and disgusting person. In Outlast Tag I have a feeling that some artists are making him completly different character, making him charming/safe/lovely. I even have seen some people who were drawing him with normal face (without big forehead) and you couldn't tell them that it's the right character design! I feel like Franco enjoyers are more agressive than fans of other Outlast character. Even with Coyle/Eddie simps they seem to understand that they are evil and they murder others, but with Franco I feel like they can take it when someone tell them that he's grown up, murder people in very brutal way and his voice lines are just disgusting... it really seems that people are getting agressive only because someone tell some shit about 🎀✨️Franco🎀✨️. I know his fans isn't the only one that have stick in their ass (cause I seen a lot of shit bout Coyle/Big Grunts/Easterman etc.) but yall need to understand that FRANCO IS A GROWN ASS MAN and you would run for your life if you'd meet someone in irl as 1% fucked up as he is. Saying that he's just a Baby and he made nothing wrong is just 🤮 and problem is in yall if you justificate him and things he made.

idk how to tell you this ,,,, but this game is fictional. The characters are fictional. You're free to feel however you want about them, just like I and anyone else is.

I partially agree with the part about changing his appearance to make him look more "normal" or whatever, but at the same time people are allowed to interpret their favs however they want to. They can draw / write for him however they want to. I don't like "fixing" his face, just because it (personally) feels like saying "he's too ugly", but again, that's just me. As an artist, I know that people are going to have different interpretations of a character I like. It's just part of other people existing in the world. Not everyone thinks like you do, and that's okay.

Do you know how many posts I saw (and STILL see) about Eddie Gluskin, doing essentially the same thing as what you said people do with Franco?? That man would cut you open to "make a baby in you" no hesitation and people still ""romanticize"" him (me fuckin included I LOVE YOU EDDIE). Its just part of liking fucked up characters, some people are going to want to make them more "normal".

Personally, I see the normalization as more like wanting to give him some normalcy in his life, because of his past / lore. I love the idea of letting Franco have a normal life, be a normal person. A life where he never had to deal with the stupid Mafia stuff, had a decent father and never ran into Murkoff, having a normal, happy life. But, I also seriously adore his original, fucked up character.

Honestly, who actually cares if people are "justifying" his actions??? None of them are real. He is not real. I have never understood the sentiment that you have to make sure people know you don't justify a fictional characters actions... they are not real. It's not a real person. None of the things he did happened.

Maybe it's just me, but I would not run from someone like him. That's not some edge lord "im so evil and dark" bs but because of my real life experiences. Been with and around people in my life / family who are quite like him and I didn't run.

I imagine some of us are using it as a sort of coping mechanism, because (at least for me) some of us dealt with people who treated us like he would. Though, that's getting into personal territory, and I won't try and speak for others.

All I can really say is either learn that not everybody's going to have the same ideas as you or block the tag. Sorry if that's too harsh a response, but life is too short to really give that much of a fuck about someone /something other people like.

And I've said this before but this is literally Outlast, all of the characters are this fucked up, it's not just him.

Like does no one remember Outlast 2??? Does no one remember the pile of dead burnt babies, or the hundreds of other fucked up things in that game?? I really feel like Franco does not compare.

So, can we please just be over with this now? I mean, drama is totally fun and I love it, but I can imagine others don't.