#girl ask GOOGLE!

[violent138]

Hey what do you think the Batfam’s reaction would be to you asking them to grab you tampons? Caus I imagine Bruce probably sticks up for periods

Ooh fun.

Bruce: *withdraws one from Bat belt, will get very grumbly if the house is seriously out and buy a ridiculous amount to prevent this scenario*

Alfred: Already had the exact brand one uses in the bathroom unasked and on time. This is both alarming and comforting.

Dick: *automatically gives you hair tie* "Oh wait what?" (pats pockets) *goes and gets them with no drama*

Jason: "Oh." *Goes and and buys mildly useless scented ones* *finger guns*

Cass: Somehow absolutely never has one on hand unless she needs them, will break a bathroom dispenser and hand you fistfuls of them.

Tim: *Goes ridiculously above and beyond, even beats Bruce for insanity, grabs heated water bottle*

Steph: *yanks several options and advil out*

Duke: *keeps some in his bathroom for Izzy* "Don't mention it."

Dami: "Why are you telling me? Wait here." (will loudly go ask Alfred for tampons) "Check under the sink."

[inkly-heart]

Hi, can I ask you something? I was curious why you called Angel, Angel because she is supposed to be a girl and Angel's name is a boy's name, right?... or, Angel is not a girl? :3?

.

[anonymous-gambito]

Word of God/movie backstory aside, it suddenly came to me that there is one other gap of knowledge that has probably contributed to a significant part of the alienation between Touga and Nanami, and it's something that existed throughout all of Nanami's life, so it's given that she wouldn't truly notice it: Touga knows they're adopted, Nanami does not. I think that makes a big difference.

Touga's backstory is bound not to be the exact same as the movie (After all, Nanami isn't even there with him), so I'll let myself speculate a bit. Their biological parents could have died, they could have abandoned them or sold them, or the siblings could have been removed from their care, and unless Nanami was brought in later to wherever Touga was, it's safe to assume that he spent at least 5 years with his original parents. He has memories of a different family, and of losing that family. Nanami doesn't even know about any of it. She doesn't realize there is a side of her brother that she never got to meet.

"Blood" is very important to Nanami. Blood is what Nanami uses to try and reassure herself that the parents who are cold and distant to her, and the brother who's grown cold and distant too, have an eternal unbreakable bond. It's very brittle though. Nanami constantly fears being replaced, discarded or harmed by her family. Most often by Touga, who ironically, happens to be her only blood relative there.

Her anxiety can be very easily explained by her experiences with how she was treated growing up in the Kiryuu household, but I do wonder if there's some subconscious parts of her that tap into these knowledge gaps too. I already felt like it was there, in the way her love for her brother is as protective as it is possessive, and how to protect him from harm, be it real or perceived, she can go feral, often shooting wildly at whoever she thinks is to blame, always hitting the wrong targets; and so maybe, I thought, it is possible that her anxieties are also tied to these repressed early childhood memories. Ones of once having a family, and then losing that world, being thrown someplace unfamiliar. Vague mostly forgotten memories fueling her fear of abandonment, working like a constant little nagging at the back of her head signaling to her how little blood ties really matter in the end.

"Blood" doesn't matter to Touga in the same way. He doesn't hold into a rose colored view of it. He knows by experience how easily those ties can be severed, how fickle they are. That's why when he found a little girl in a coffin, a little girl who spoke of there not being anything eternal, of how those you care about are bound to leave you, and questioning what's even the point of living then, he couldn't give her anything. He couldn't save her. He didn't know the answer for himself either.

[technically-human]

I love your dbd art so much. It just warms my heart. You should totally do a fem!payneland meets canon payneland one

Thank you!! 💕💕

Oh, that's a very good idea. God knows I've been thinking about fem!Payneland, I've seen so many good versions of them! I've been struggling with my own designs though, haven't found something that feels right. But once I do, they will join the boys and they will all be stupid together, I promise

[cafulur]

idk why but something about this question being asked is so funny to me

[quixtrix]

tired of people being like "yall dont talk about dolph" "yall dont talk about sarah" the answer is right there look at both of them

[ramesees]

Brothers I had to listen to another ChatGPT pitch at work today and my strength wanes. I know in my heart that minds cannot be changed through aggression. But, oh, the temptation to lay truths upon my coworkers ruinous belief in AI overwhelms me. Would it be too much to tell them? Would I be cast out? Could I not utter the simple phrase, “you are describing google”, without rocks being thrown through my windows? Alas. I know my place. It is on my knees, palms open, face raised in supplication to the god of my company. I will weep, and tell them these are tears of joy.

[neris-illust]

Love your human shockwave but she has me battling for my life in my head not to call her mommy

ignore the two different lineart styles I get bored easily

[shaibonbon]

Little esboço da Bon, com os melhores cumprimentos

AWAWAWAAAAAAWWAAAAAA 😳🥺🥺🥺

💜💜💜💜❤️❤️💜🥹💜💜🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹💜💜💜❤️❤️ AMO COMO FIZESTE BONBON, ELA FICOU TÃO FOFINHA E BONITINHA IHIHIH <33 JURO O LITTLE ESBOÇO ESTÁ MAIS PARA GRANDE OBRA PRIMA MDS, A VONTADE DE COLOCAR ISSO POR TODO LADO E MOSTRAR A TODOS- ❤️💜💜💜❤️💜💕❤️ THANKS YOUUUUUUU, AGRADEÇO IMENSO 🥹

O TEU ESTILO DE ARTE É SIMPLESMENTE FABULOSO E FANTÁSTICO 💜🥹💜💜❤️💜 AMO COMO FIZESTE O CABELO E O SHADING<33

*happy bunny*

Agora tenho de retribuir o favor >:d

[sea-jello]

@nyaskitten tumblr ate your fucking ask uhh ignore how this is months later BUT i finally watched dr s2 AND

I GET IT NOW. I UNDERSTAND.

[moeblob]

New OCs

(briefly, humans and supernatural beings have to team up for building better relations with each other and all the supernaturals can shapeshift and take on human appearances but also have their 'original form'.)

OK so I was GOING to draw fanart today - I had a fun idea and everything! But health anxiety (and anti-anxiety meds) wore me out so I kinda .... slogged through OCs as a treat to me. I am going to go to the doctor tomorrow so HOPEFULLY it's all okay.

[erinarigby]

Hi🤠

What do you think about FemPaul and FemJohn's relationship?

Would their relationship have changed dramatically if they were women or would it have been just as strong?

Just when I think of them I don't get any chemistry between them, I mean they would definitely have something, but that's where my whole brain process stops...

What do you think?

i think their dynamic would be slightly changed (mclennon is already like a toxic lesbian situationship as it is) but fem mclennon would have the same intensity and bond as their male counterparts.

they would be more willing to be affectionate and touchy with eachother. their internalized homophobia is less of feeling dirty for being attracted to the same sex and more of a heteronormative kind… both of them try to convince themselves that their attraction is shallow and nothing more than a game between 2 friends, just a phase.

i see fem paul as a lesbian with comphet, she wants to have a husband and start a family. this conflicts with fem john who doesn’t want to lose paul to a man and become a house wife. fem john probably is married and has julian but i do see her as still being neglectful and projects (valid) feelings of her marriage of convience onto paul

john is the more headstrong and outspoken of the two, i could see her as being a second wave feminist and being very aware of how being a woman affects how she exists in society. paul is more hesitant and not on board with it, being more of a liberal feminist i suppose… very lukewarm because of how she was taught to want to have a traditional family.

also they are still codependent.

[demilypyro]

so true

[boyfridged]

i’ve been thinking a lot about what is so unique and appealing about 80s robin jay’s moral standing that got completely lost in plot later on. and i think a huge part of it is that in a genre so focused on crime-fighting, his motivations and approach don’t focus on the category of crime at all. in fact, he doesn’t seem to believe in any moral dogma; and it’s not motivated by nihilism, but rather his open-heartedness and relational ethical outlook.

we first meet (post-crisis) jay when he is stealing. when confronted about his actions by bruce he’s confident that he didn’t do anything wrong – he’s not apologetic, he doesn’t seem to think that he has morally failed on any account. later on, when confronted by batman again, jay says that he’s no “crook.” at this point, the reader might assume that jay has no concept of wrong-doing, or that stealing is just not one of the deeds that he considers wrong-doing. yet, later on we see jay so intent on stopping ma gunn and her students, refusing to be implicit in their actions. there are, of course, lots of reasons for which we can assume he was against stealing in this specific instance (an authority figure being involved, the target, the motivations, the school itself being an abusive environment etc.), but what we gather is that jay has an extremely strong sense of justice and is committed to moral duty. that's all typical for characters in superhero comics, isn't it? however, what remains distinctive is that this moral duty is not dictated by any dogma – he trusts his moral instincts. this attitude – his distrust toward power structures, confidence in his moral compass, and situational approach, is something that is maintained throughout his robin run. it is also evident in how he evaluates other people – we never see him condemning his parents, for example, and that includes willis, who was a petty criminal. i think from there arises the potential for a rift between bruce and jay that could be, have jay lived, far more utilised in batman comics than it was within his short robin run.

after all, while bruce’s approach is often called a ‘philosophy of love and care,’ he doesn’t ascribe to the ethics of care [eoc] (as defined in modern scholarship btw) in the same way that jay does. ethics of care ‘deny that morality consists in obedience to a universal law’ and focus on the ideals of caring for other people and non-institutionalized justice. bruce, while obviously caring, is still bound by his belief in the legal system and deontological norms. he is benevolent, but he is also ultimately morally committed to the idea of a legal system and thus frames criminals as failing to meet these moral (legal-adjacent) standards (even when he recognizes it is a result of their circumstances). in other words, he might think that a criminal is a good person despite leading a life of crime. meanwhile, for jay there is no despite; jay doesn't think that engaging in crime says anything about a person's moral personality at all. morality, for him, is more of an emotional practice, grounded in empathy and the question of what he can do for people ‘here and now.’ he doesn’t ascribe to maxims nor utilitarian calculations. for jay, in morality, there’s no place for impartiality that bruce believes in; moral decisions are embedded within a net of interpersonal relationships and social structures that cannot be generalised like the law or even a “moral code” does it. it’s all about responsiveness. 

to sum up, jay's moral compass is relative and passionate in a way that doesn't fit batman's philosophy. this is mostly because bruce wants to avoid the sort of arbitrariness that seems to guide eoc. also, both for vigilantism, and jay, eoc poses a challenge in the sense that it doesn't create a certain 'intellectualised' distance from both the victims and the perpetrators; there's no proximity in the judgment; it's emotional.

all of this is of course hardly relevant post-2004. there might be minimal space for accommodating some of it within the canon progression (for example, the fact that eoc typically emphasises the responsibility that comes with pre-existing familial relationships and allows for prioritizing them, as well as the flexibility regarding moral deliberations), but the utilitarian framework and the question of stopping the crime vs controlling the underworld is not something that can be easily reconciled with jay’s previous lack of interest in labeling crime. 

[cozylittleartblog]

I LOVE HOE YOU DRAW ROUXLS AND QUEEN SM ITS JUST SO GOOD AHHHHHHH I before didn't entirely ship queen and Rouxls, but now I do. I love how beautiful your art is and if you haven't already you NEED to see L Voids dubs of your comics, they're amazing!

thank you! enjoy the brainrot o7 and i have seen some of his dubs, he does a good job

[pinetreeshack]

Can I see a picture of Harriet

yes u may