#gas for this new car is less than 60$

[fruitless-vain]

Yeah we got a new car n sold the truck 😂

[batboyblog]

Things Biden and the Democrats did, this week #18

May 10-17 2024

The Justice Department endorses lifting many restrictions on marijuana. Since the 1970s marijuana has been classified as a Schedule I controlled substance, the most restrictive classification for drugs that are highly addictive, dangerous and have no medical use, like heroin. Schedule I drugs are nearly impossible to get approval for research studies greatly hampering attempts to understand marijuana and any medical benefits it may have. The DoJ recommends moving it to Schedule III, drugs with low risk of abuse like anabolic steroids, and testosterone. This will allow for greater research, likely allow medical marijuana, and make marijuana a much less serious offense. President Biden welcomed DoJ's decision, a result a review of policy he ordered. Biden in his message talked about how he's pardoned everyone convicted of marijuana possession federally. The President repeated a phrase he's said many times "No-one should be in jail just for using or possessing marijuana,"

The Department of Interior announced no new coal mining in America's largest coal producing region. The moratorium on new coal leases has been hailed as the single biggest step so fair toward ending coal in the US. The Powder River Basin area of Wyoming and Montana produces 40% of the nations coal, the whole state of West Virginia is just 14%. The new rule is estimated to reduce emissions by the equivalent of 293 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, the same as taking 63 million gas powered cars off the road.

Vice-President Harris announced that the Biden-Harris Administration had broken records by investing $16 billion in Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Harris, a graduate of Howard University, is the first President or Vice-President to have gone to a HBCU. The Administration's investment of $900 million so far in 2024 brought the total investment of the Biden-Harris administration in HBCUs to $16 billion more than double the record $7 billion. HBCUs produce 40% of black engineers, 50% of black teachers, 70% of black doctors and dentists, and 80% of black judges. HBCUs also have a much better record of helping social mobility and moving people out of generational poverty than other colleges and universities.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development announced $30 billion dollars in renewal funding for the Housing Choice Voucher Program. The program supports 2.3 million families that are in need of housing with vouchers that help pay rent. This funding represents a $2 billion dollar increase over last year.

The Department of Agriculture announced $671.4 million in investments in rural infrastructure. The money will go to project to improve rural electric grids, as well as drinking water and wastewater treatment infrastructure. The money will go to 47 projects across 23 states.

HUD announced a record breaking $1.1 billion dollar investment in Tribal housing and community development. HUD plans just over 1 billion dollars for the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program. This is a 40% increase in funding over 2023 and marks the largest ever funding investment in Indian housing. HUD also is investing $75 million in community development, supporting building and rehabbing community buildings in American Indian and Alaska Native communities.

The Department of Transportation announced $2 billion in investments in America's busiest passenger rail route, the Northeast Corridor between Washington DC and Boston. This is part of a 15 year, $176 billion plan to rebuild the corridor’s infrastructure and prepare for increased ridership and more trains. So far investments have seen a 25% increase, 7 million riders, over figures last year. a fully funded plan would almost double Amtrak service between New York City and Washington, D.C., and increase service between New York City and Boston by 50%. It would also allow a 60% increase in commuter trains.

HUD announced plans to streamline its HOME program. Currently the largest federal program to help build affordable housing, the streamlining of the rules will speed up building and help meet the Biden Administration's goal of 2 million new affordable housing units. HUD announced last week $1.3 billion dollars for the HOME program, which built 13,000 new units of housing in 2023 and helped 13,000 families with rental assistance

The Department of Interior announced $520 million in new water projects to help protect against drought in the western states. The funding will support 57 water related projects across 18 western states. The projects focus on climate resilience and drought prevention, as well as improving aging water delivery systems, and improving hydropower generation.

The Departments of Agriculture and HHS have stepped up efforts to wipe out the H5N1 virus prevent its spread to humans while protecting farmers livelihoods. The virus is currently effecting dairy cattle in the Texas panhandle region. The USDA and HSS are releasing wide ranging funds to help support farms equipping workers with Personal Protective Equipment, covering Veterinary costs, as well as compensating farmers for lost revenue. HHS and the CDC announced $101 million in testing an monitoring. This early detection and action is key to preventing another Covid style pandemic.

The Senate confirmed Sanket Bulsara to a life time federal judgeship in New York and Eric Schulte and Camela Theeler to lifetime federal judgeships in South Dakota. This brings the total number of judges appointed by President Biden to 197. For the first time in history the majority of a President's judicial nominees have not been white men.

Bonus: The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that transgender health insurance exclusions were illegal. The ruling came from a case first filed in 2019 where an employer refused to cover an employee's gender affirming surgery. The court in its ruling sited new guidance from the Biden Administration's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that declared that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects trans people in the work place. These kinds of guidelines are often sited in court and carry great weight.

[briar-ffxiv]

Hate to do this, but if anyone can help

TL: DR - Due to a lot of financial strain this year and moving before we planned to with little notice, my cats and my family don't have money for groceries for the next few months. We just need to make it to January and we've been trying hard, eating as cheap as possible, not going out, no extra services, etc. Heck, I only have FFXIV because a friend was nice enough to help.

But now, we're out of money and next paycheck once we cover rent and bills, we'll have less than $30. And unfortunately, we need to eat.

So if anyone can help, I'd appreciate it. Anything. Thank you. <3

Below the read-more are the longer details. If anyone doesn't mind boosting or something, I'd be grateful.

More Details:

Basically, due to having to move at least a year sooner than expected with less than 60 days' notice, we've used up every bit of savings and resources we have. Plus, due to some other financial nonsense, including the past roommates being terrible and my spouse's work using loopholes to avoid paying him overtime, we're finally having a really rough time.

We can just cover rent and the minimal bills. Several months ago, we turned off anything we didn't completely need. That includes streaming services, games, and what have you. Heck, we wouldn't have kept on the internet if my spouse didn't need it for work.

We were just trying to hold on until New Year. The New Year means a mandatory raise for my spouse and his boss has promised it's a good one (due to several years of him getting the minimum under his previous boss who was fired for several reasons). So we've been just trying to make it and just have a few months left.

Unfortunately, with just a few months to go, we've basically maxed out all we can. The next step is trying to rehome my cats to remove the cost of maintaining them, although I hate to do it. I really don't want to. Pretty much every cat I have, I either rescued and/or raised from birth. But I'm certainly not going to let them starve or suffer.

I have been trying for months to get a job, but due to personal things and limited options (only one car with limited gas, etc.), I haven't been able to find anything. I keep sending out forms and not hearing much. Due to gas prices and such, I can't even do UberEats or Doordash or something. I'm at a loss and I feel completely useless in trying to help my spouse at the moment.

I really hate asking. My little Tumblr is just cute stuff with my character, aesthetics, and trying to be positive. I'm just really desperate because I don't know what else to do.

We've looked into state help, but I live in Texas and their "poverty line" is absolutely ridiculous. My spouse makes "too much" for us to get the benefits of any kind of help, even temporarily. Due to the crappy roommates, our credit isn't great and we're already struggling to pay off things so getting a loan is pretty much impossible.

I don't really have any skills that people would pay for commissions for. I'd be happy to do writing commissions or something, but I've never had much luck with that.

So, yeah, I just...I really need some help getting through the next 60 days or so. So if you've read all this, thank you. If you reblog, thank you. If you feel like giving anything, thank you. Even if it's just kind thoughts, I appreciate it so much.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart,

Bard

[justinspoliticalcorner]

WaPo: How car bans and heat pump rules drive voters to the far right

Shannon Osaka at WaPo:

More than a decade ago, the Netherlands embarked on a straightforward plan to cut carbon emissions. Its legislature raised taxes on natural gas, using the money earned to help Dutch households install solar panels. By most measures, the program worked: By 2022, 20 percent of homes in the Netherlands had solar panels, up from about 2 percent in 2013. Natural gas prices, meanwhile, rose by almost 50 percent. But something else happened, according to a new study. The Dutch families who were most vulnerable to the increase in gas prices — renters who paid their own utility bills — drifted to the right. Families facing increased home energy costs became 5 to 6 percent more likely to vote for one of the Netherlands’ far-right parties. A similar backlash is happening all over Europe, as far-right parties position themselves in opposition to green policies. In Germany, a law that would have required homeowners to install heat pumps galvanized the far-right Alternative for Germany party, or AfD, giving it a boost. Farmers have rolled tractors into Paris to protest E.U. agricultural rules, and drivers in Italy and Britain have protested attempts to ban gas-guzzling cars from city centers.

That resurgence of the right could slow down the green transition in Europe, which has been less polarized on global warming, and serves as a warning to the United States, where policies around electric vehicles and gas stoves have already sparked a backlash. The shift also shows how, as climate policies increasingly touch citizens’ lives, even countries whose voters are staunchly supportive of clean energy may hit roadblocks. “This has really expanded the coalition of the far right,” said Erik Voeten, a professor of geopolitics at Georgetown University and the author of the new study on the Netherlands.

Other studies have found similar results. In one study in Milan, researchers at Bocconi University studied the voting patterns of drivers whose cars were banned from the city center for being too polluting. These drivers, who on average lost the equivalent of $4,000 because of the ban, were significantly more likely to vote for the right-wing Lega party in subsequent elections. In Sweden, researchers found that low-income families facing high electricity prices were also more likely to turn toward the far right. Far-right parties in Europe have started to position themselves against climate action, expanding their platforms from anti-immigration and anti-globalization. A decade ago, the Dutch right-wing Party for Freedom emphasized that it wasn’t against renewable energy — just increasing energy prices. But by 2021, the party’s manifesto had moved to more extreme language. “Energy is a basic need, but climate madness has turned it into a very expensive luxury item,” the manifesto said. “The far right has increasingly started to campaign on opposition to environmental policies and climate change,” Voeten said.

The pushback also reflects, in part, how much Europe has decarbonized. More than 60 percent of the continent’s electricity already comes from renewable sources or nuclear power; so meeting the European Union’s climate goals means tacklingother sectors — transportation, buildings, agriculture.

[...] Some of these voting patterns have also played out in the United States. According to a study by the Princeton political scientist Alexander Gazmararian, historically-Democratic coal communities that lost jobs in the shift to natural gas increased their support for Republican candidates by 5 percent. The shift was larger in areas located farther from new gas power plants — that is, areas where voters couldn’t see that it was natural gas, not environmental regulations, that undercut coal.

Gazmararian says that while climate denial and fossil fuel misinformation have definitely played a role, many voters are motivated simply by their own financial pressures. “They’re in an economic circumstance where they don’t have many options,” he said. The solution, experts say, is todesign policies that avoid putting too much financial burden on individual consumers. In Germany, where the law to install heat pumps would have cost homeowners $7,500 to $8,500 more than installing gas boilers, policymakers quickly retreated. But by that point, far-right party membership had already surged.

The Washington Post explains what may be at least partially causing the rise of far-right extremist parties in Europe, Conservatives in Canada, and the Republicans in some parts of the US: rising energy costs that low-income people are bearing the brunt of.

In the US, right-wing hysteria about gas stove bans and electric vehicles are also playing a role.

[rjzimmerman]

Excerpt from this New York Times story:

When Interstate 25 was constructed through Denver, highway engineers moved a river.

It was the 1950s, and nothing was going to get in the way of building a national highway system. Colorado’s governor and other dignitaries, including the chief engineer of the state highway department, acknowledged the moment by posing for a photo standing on bulldozer tracks, next to the trench that would become Interstate 25.

Today, state highway departments have rebranded as transportation agencies, but building, fixing and expanding highways is still mostly what they do.

So it was notable when, in 2022, the head of Colorado’s Department of Transportation called off a long planned widening of Interstate 25. The decision to do nothing was arguably more consequential than the alternative. By not expanding the highway, the agency offered a new vision for the future of transportation planning.

In Colorado, that new vision was catalyzed by climate change. In 2019, Gov. Jared Polis signed a law that required the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90 percent within 30 years. As the state tried to figure out how it would get there, it zeroed in on drivers. Transportation is the largest single contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, accounting for about 30 percent of the total; 60 percent of that comes from cars and trucks. To reduce emissions, Coloradans would have to drive less.

An effective bit of bureaucracy drove that message home. After sustained lobbying from climate and environmental justice activists, the Transportation Commission of Colorado adopted a formal rule that makes the state transportation agency, along with Colorado’s five metropolitan planning organizations, demonstrate how new projects, including highways, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. If they don’t, they could lose funding.

Within a year of the rule’s adoption in 2021, Colorado’s Department of Transportation, or CDOT, had canceled two major highway expansions, including Interstate 25, and shifted $100 million to transit projects. In 2022, a regional planning body in Denver reallocated $900 million from highway expansions to so-called multimodal projects, including faster buses and better bike lanes.

Now, other states are following Colorado’s lead. Last year, Minnesota passed a $7.8 billion transportation spending package with provisions modeled on Colorado’s greenhouse gas rule. Any project that added road capacity would have to demonstrate how it contributed to statewide greenhouse gas reduction targets. Maryland is considering similar legislation, as is New York.

[tonguetyd]

literally annoyed that all coastal states (including my dumb glove shaped state) aren't 90% hydro/wind

i might not be an engineer but i am with you there

*drags soapbox out and jumps on top*

DO YOU KNOW HOW INFURIATING IT IS TO HAVE EVERYONE SAY “ELECTRIFY EVERYTHING” KNOWING FULL GODDAMN WELL THAT THE GRID 1) CANNOT SUPPORT IT AND 2) IS DRASTICALLY NOT BASED ON RENEWABLE ENERGY?!?!?!

Don’t get me wrong I love electric cars, I love heat pump systems, I love buildings and homes that can say they are fossil fuel free! Really! I do!

But it means FUCK ALL when you have!!!! Said electricity!!!! Sourced by fossil fuels!!!! I said this in my tags on the other post but New York City! Was operating on *COAL*!!!!! Up until like 5 years ago.

WE ARE SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OF A RIVER.

Not to mention the ocean which like. You ever been to the beach?! You know what there’s a whole hell of a lot of at the beach? Wind!!!!!!!! And yet we have literal campaigns saying “save our oceans! Say no to wind power!”

Idk bruh I feel like the fish are gonna be less happy in a boiling ocean than needing to swim around a giant turbine but. I’m not a fuckin fish so.

NOT TO MENTION (I am fully waving my hands around like a crazy person because this is the main thing that gets me going)

THE ELECTRICAL GRID OF THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED ON LARGE SCALE LEVELS SINCE IT WAS BUILT IN THE 1950s AND 60s.

It is not DESIGNED to handle every building in the city of [random map location] Chicago being off of gas and completely electrified. It’s not!!! The plants cannot handle it as now!

So not only do we not have renewable sources because somebody in Iowa doesn’t want to replace their corn field with a solar field/a rich Long Islander doesn’t want to replace their ocean view with a wind turbine! We also are actively encouraging people to put MORE of a strain on the grid with NO FUCKING SOLUTION TO MEET THAT DEMAND!

I used to deal with this *all* the time in my old job when I was working with smaller building - they ALWAYS needed an electrical upgrade from the street and like. The utility only has so many wires going to that building. And it’s not planning on bringing in more for the most part!

(I am now vibrating with rage) and THEN you have the fuckin AI bros! Who have their data centers in the middle of nowhere because that’s a great place to have a lot of servers that you need right? Yeah sure, you know what those places don’t have? ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE STUPID AMOUNT OF POWER AI NEEDS!!!!!!!

Now the obvious solution is that the AI bros of Google and Microsoft and whoever the fuck just use their BILLIONS OF FUCKING DOLLARS IN PROFIT to be good neighbors and upgrade the fucking systems because truly what is the downside to that everybody fucking wins!

But what do I know. I’m just friendly neighborhood engineer.

*hops down from soapbox*

[somethingusefulfromflorida]

When I first bought my car back in April I never let it dip below half a tank. Since I moved in September, I usually wait until it's below a quarter before filling up. Last week I let it run down to about an eighth, and it took a hair over 14 gallons to fill it up completely which means it has a 16 gallon tank, more or less. When I got it, I lived in an area dominated by highways; I would regularly get it up to 60 mph going to a from work, and it got decent gas mileage at 30 per gallon. Now that I live in a dense city with stop lights every 10 feet, I'm lucky to get 20. On the dashboard above the radio is a little LCD screen that tells me my fuel economy and how many miles I have left until I run empty. I've been tracking those figures against my odometer since mid-May, and it's not good.

When I got it, I would regularly outperform expectations. Say I drove 100 miles, the fuel range indicator would only go down 90, meaning I traveled 10 miles further than it said I should based on the amount of fuel I used. This slowly crept down, 10 miles better, 7 miles, 5, 3, for a while it was dead even, but since July I've been in the read. I'll drive 100 miles, and the fuel range meter will go down 120 or 130. Doing the math, driven distance over fuel range decrease, my best performance was 120% efficient, and the worst was 65%. Think about that. 65%, less than two-thirds, which means for every 100 miles I drive my fuel tank thinks I'm driving over 150! I'm burning through it like it's nothing!

I don't know what kind of math is going down under the hood, but my maximum fuel range has been dropping too. In April, a full tank of gas could supposedly get me 396 miles; more than that, actually, given my net positive fuel efficiency. Filling it up last week, same tank, same 16 gallons, it's telling me I can only get 323 miles. 396 miles on 16 gallons, the computer thought I was getting 24.75 miles per gallon regardless of how good it actually was. 323 miles is 20.1875 mpg; the indicator regularly dips below 20 when I'm stuck in traffic, and I can actually watch it tick down in increments of 0.1 when I'm at particularly congested redlights.

Sooner or later, it's going to get to the point where I'm less than half efficient. I'll drive 100 miles, and it'll use the fuel for 200 or more. I'll be lucky to get 250 miles on a full tank, which at present time would cost me $50 to fill from empty. Gas prices were higher this summer, $3.80-ish, got down to just below $3.00 even in October, right now they're hovering around $3.20 - $3.30, and as we enter the presidential election I can see it exploding up to $4.00 or more again, over $60 for a full tank.

My car's a 2007 with 132,000 miles on it, so I guess this sort of degradation is to be expected, but it means that it's going to crap out on me in a couple of years. Once I start my new job I'll have to build back up my savings so I can buy something halfway decent. It took me a year and a half to save up $10,000 when I lived with my parents, but now I'm out on my own and have rent and medical bills (I make so little money that I get a tax credit from the IRS that completely covers my insurance, but it's the cheapest plan on the market with next to no coverage, so every doctor visit is astronomical), so I expect to be stuck with my clunker until 2025 at the earliest. I just hope it'll last that long.

[tubbytarchia]

Living in Estonia as it becomes possibly the most expensive EU country to live in rant

Oh my god, oh my god?? Up to 2022 Estonia for many years was declared the country with the best tax system, and you know what? Yeah. Life was decent, but previous governments fucked everything up by making things too comfy, what's the result? And keep in mind that almost ALL of these have already risen by maybe 10-20% at the least in the last year

Gas prices set to raise by 27% to 75% Water price set to raise up to 400% Nursing home prices have already doubled company charges set to raise by 60% Continuous VAT increase, set to increase by 20% at the start of the new year and then more later on, which raises all prices (And store items have already increased, in some cases by double what they cost in 2022! So a total of about 70% food price increase in January!!) Harsh car tax in 2025 Sugar tax up to 25% No confirmation but safely assumed in the near future: Significant increases in alcohol tax, fuel excise duty, land tax, social tax, work insurance tax, deforestation tax (ok cant complain with that one lol I guess?) ON TOP OF the current inflation, euribor increase, salary decrease etc

By 2027, if things were to stay the same, Estonia would be 1.7 billion eur in debt. This is because previous governments continued to introduce fixed costs (mostly to families (AKA if you have kids), companies and the elderly. I can confirm personally as my sister gets pretty ridiculously big sums from the country for having a child. And in the past, establishing a company was a very easy way to earn a ton of money from the country without any drawbacks. Pensions have been increased multiple times, while the number of elderly in Estonian has only been growing) without really finding sources to cover those costs. Our economic growth should grow by like 10% a year to get this money, which obviously isn't going to happen. The country has no option other than to raise costs for all the commoners who earn average or less than. At least, those are the only people having their lives thrown into a goddamn shitpit. Because the country cannot take money away from pensions, military, education and state employees like police and teachers (though teachers' pay is already criminally low). And if we took loans we would just be paying billions of loan interest in 2027

No outside investors will want to come here anymore with the ridiculous prices, and I can only assume that that's why we don't ever get good goddamn things. We got GameStop and Subway which then less than a year later left. I wonder why?? And given the VAT increase which shows no signs of stopping, Estonia is set to become the country with the most expensive food prices in Europe

Estonia still has free education and healthcare (at least... for emergencies) so I feel like I automatically can't complain much given that places like the US experience price increases too on top of stupid education and healthcare prices. But holy shit? How am I ever supposed to move out and live? If I ever have to leave my parents' place I'm getting the fuck out of Estonia and I hope many dozens of others do too. Again, not that the current government has much other choice but idk, can't help but wish they just taxed the shit out of rich people or sum. Just tax rich people regardless, in every country, why can't we tax those guys more instead of the poor etc. It's maddening, how are any of us supposed to live

[peter-author]

More Profit From Almost Nothing

Manufacturing is a simple formula. You take a small amount of material, mold or shape it into something unique and sell it for many hundreds of times more money than the material cost you. A Rolex has maybe $40 worth of raw materials. Carefully designed and constructed, it is worth thousands when complete, many times that when fashionable. So too with cars.

The problem with the car industry is that they are convinced that the formula works so well that they want to make more money but there are only so many customers. Everyone either has or uses a car. Out of the 350,000,000 Americans of all ages – babies and non-drivers -- there already are 278,063,737 personal and commercial vehicles. So the problem facing car manufacturers trying to make more and more profit is that either they have to try and sell two cars to every driver or they have to make the cars much more expensive, thereby making more profit.

The manufacturers chose the latter solution.

How do you make the car more expensive and thereby profitable? Remember the formula: take 10¢ of steel, shape it and sell it for $1.00. Now, there are exceptions to this rule. First you can create a mystique about Bentley, Mercedes, BMW and the like and get an extra 10% for “beat-the-Jones” show-off value. But 10% is not enough to satisfy Wall Street investors. Or you can make very limited numbers of a model to create extra demand like Ferrari and Porsche. Or you can stick to the manufacturing profit model and simply add more and more steel and other components.

It all started to get out of hand with Ralph Nader who declared the ’69 Corsair “unsafe at any speed.” The Corsair was the only US manufactured rear engine car. Kill the Corsair and you effectively killed the other “unsafe” car, the VW Beetle. The Corsair weighed 2,414 lbs. The VW Beetle weighed only 1,742 lbs. and out-performed and was more reliable. But that Nader label of “unsafe” effectively killed the US market for the rear-engined Beetle. VW’s answer was to put the motor back in front, add almost another ton of steel, and relaunch the Beetle. More steel equaled a higher price and more profit.

Meanwhile, Chevy and Ford sedans in the mid-‘60s weighed 2,600 lbs. By 2022 they had ballooned up to 3,500 lbs. More material, more profit. VW Jetta’s are 50% heavier than when launched. Camry weighed 2,161 lbs. when launched in 1982, now weigh in at 3,310 lbs. In the SUV market, 2023 weights are getting up close to 6,000 lbs. or 3 tons for Tahoes and Expeditions.

And then along came electric cars.

Instead of going back to lighter, less bulky chassis, they simply stuck the new motor(s) and all those batteries in conventional platforms, adding another 300 lbs. even though they had removed the engine and gearbox – hardly lightweight components – and had reduced the overall size of the car by 20%. And Tesla? The lightest is 4,048 lbs. with the Model X at 5,390 lbs. And the prices for these increases in weight? Pretty much in lock step. More metal and plastic costs you more.

Now here’s the question we all need to ask ourselves: given today’s technology providing reliability mechanically (which is also lighter than old cast-iron engines), wouldn’t it be nice to have a reasonably heavy car instead of a gas guzzling heavyweight or an electric car that can only go 200 miles? Put today’s engine into a 1968 Volvo weighing 2,500 lbs. and you’d get 50 mpg and all the safety needed. Put an electric drivetrain in an original VW Beetle and you’d get 400-mile range with half the batteries of a Tesla. Or do as Ford is doing, stripping out all the unessentials, and launching the Maverick small truck with a base price of $22,000. Now that’s a business model to suit today’s consumer.

[sassypotatoe1]

I also like to remind people that phones are now a requirement to participate in society. You need an email and a cell number on your CV and to be reachable at any time to qualify for most, if not all minimum wage positions. Nevermind higher paying jobs. And you not only need a phone that can access emails, you need an internet plan. If you want to get out of poverty and homelessness you already need a phone and reliable transport, and you can only get housing financing if you have a full time job. If you rent you need to work like 60 hours minimum wage a week and then a second job as well, but you can buy a phone and a prepaid internet plan from one day's donations in some cases, with which it can be a slight bit easier to get a job. It's no longer a luxury, it's a necessity.

In the past you could submit a CV typed up and printed out for free at the local library in person and get a job. Now they're defunding libraries and declaring them insolvent and closing them up, and using an internet Cafe is more expensive than a phone and prepaid plan. You are also required to email or electronically submit CV's for literally any job, in-person hand-ins aren't accepted anymore.

People also often get tvs as gifts or second hand at major discount, and they get it for news and educational programs for young kids when they can't get into preschool. They buy and fix broken old appliances, some who are very good at it will get a broken like smeg appliance that like needs a fuse replaced or a bolt tightened and fix it up for less than the cost of the cheapest new ones. I've seen this happen a lot where I live specifically.

We have people that immigrate that want to get rid of stuff that sell furniture or appliances for insanely cheap or even give it away for free just to get rid of it because it's cheaper to buy new furniture and appliances wherever they're going than to ship their shit over. They advertise the collection on Facebook and if the person can pick it up themselves or contribute to gas for delivery they can get a 14k couch for 3k. (like 150ish euro pound or dollars).

Poor people don't buy things new almost ever. A lot of poor people salvage junk or get things for free or at highly discounted prices or as gifts. You'll also frequently see that some poor people will sell appliances to pawn shops to make rent that month.

I'm scrabbling a bit to get enough of a deposit to get an apartment that's not an outright health risk so I can move out from my parents house and go no contact because they're like, fully okay with my brother dating a nazi and also homophobic and abusive so I need to get out. It's cheaper for me to rent a storage unit, stick all my furniture and appliances in there for a year, and pay the shelter fee for a bed, shower and plate of dinner a month than renting the cheapest place available. I mean just over half of the lowest rent in my area covers storage rent and shelter fees.

If I need to get out quick and I go this route, I can save so much on rent and utilities that I can keep my phone plan and car. I'll still be dirt fucking poor, unless I can find a place that's 2k in rent and utilities combined which is literally impossible right now. I'll have to lose my medical aid and stop my meds (which can very easily kill me), but I could survive a bit.

Having "luxury" items that are actually just basic necessities does not make you a liar about being poor or bad with managing your money. It makes you smart, actually, and we need to start minding our business about poor people if it's not to give them money.

[batboyblog]

Things Biden and the Democrats did, this week #11

March 22-29 2024

The Administration, with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg in the lead responded to the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore. Working with Governor Wes Moore and Mayor Brandon Scott (both Democrats) The Department of Transportation promises to clear the harbor and rebuild the bride. DoT has already released $60 million in emergency funds as a "down payment" and President Biden is expected to seek $1 billion from Congress.

Vice President Harris announced a number of actions and investments designed to improve the quality of life of the peoples of northern central America. driven by poverty, lack of economic opportunities, and out of control crime people in Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras are taking great risks and trusting criminal human traffickers to try to reach the US. The Administration is working to improve conditions in the Northern Triangle so that is no longer necessary. Vice President Harris announced $1 billion dollars in new investments as part of the Central America Forward public-private partnership, since 2021 it has invested $5.2 billion in the region. Harris also announced $175 million dollars of direct aid from the US to Guatemala at a meeting with Guatemalan President Bernardo Arévalo.

The Department of Energy announced a $1.5 billion dollar loan to help restart the Palisades Nuclear Plant. This would mark the first time a nuclear power plant was brought back online after being decommissioned. The hope is keep the plant running till 2051, this 100% green power source is projected to prevent 111 million tons of CO2 emissions in its new life time, the same as taking 100,000 cars off the road. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer touted it as key for her state reaching its goal of 100% clean energy by 2040.

Vice President Harris launched a social media push to inform the public about the Biden-Harris Administration's SAVE Plan. The Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan was launched last year as part of President Biden's efforts to bring student loan forgiveness to millions of borrowers. Currently 7.7 million people are enrolled in SAVE, under which anyone making $16 a hour or less has a monthly payment of $0 on their student loans. 4.5 million SAVE enrollees are making $0 a month payments and another 1 million pay less than $100 a month on their loan repayment, over 150,000 people so far have had their loans totally forgiven. Republicans are suing to try to shut down the SAVE Plan

President Biden took keep steps to ensure quality healthcare this week. Biden extended the window for low-income Americans to apply for Obamacare. The original deadline of July 31st has been pushed back to November 30th. Biden also rolled back Trump era rules that allowed subsidies for "Junk Health insurance" These plans offer very little coverage and often mislead consumers into believing they have insurance when they aren't covered. These short term plans also don't have meet Obamacare standards and can refuse coverage for preexisting conditions.

The EPA announced new regulations aimed at "turbocharging" the number of electric trucks on the road. The new rules aim to have 25% of new long-haul trucks, the heaviest often diesel trucks on the road, and 40% of medium-size trucks (box trucks and landscaping vehicles) be nonpolluting by 2032, currently just 2% are. The regulation would apply to more than 100 types of vehicles including tractor-trailers, ambulances, R.V.s, garbage trucks and moving vans. The new tailpipe limits are expected to prevent about a billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions by 2055.

the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services  announced that thanks to President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, 41 different drugs will coast those on Medicare Part B less money than it did last year.  An estimated 763,700 people on Medicare use at least one of these drugs every year. Some enrollees will save as much as $3,575 per dose.

The Department of Energy announced $6 billion for an effort to decarbonize energy-intensive industries. The investment in 33 projects across 20 states will eliminate 14 million metric tons of CO2 emissions each year when finished. Each project is meant to be highly replicable and serve as a blueprint for future private sector ventures. 

President Biden signed an Executive Order to Strengthen the Recognition of Women’s History. The Order will launch a review of all historic sites run by the National Parks Service to determine ways to better highlight the role of women, from all backgrounds, in American History.

The Senate Confirmed President Biden's nominees, Ernesto Gonzalez, and Leon Schydlower to federal judgeships in Texas. This brings the total number of federal judges appointed by President Biden to 190.

[carbarnblog]

Hybrid Cars Australia: Best Models and Deals in 2024

The Australian car market is moving towards more eco-friendly options. Hybrid cars are becoming very popular. They mix traditional engines with electric motors for better performance and fuel use.

In 2024, Australia will see a wide range of hybrid cars. There will be many deals for those looking for a new car. This change meets the needs of today's car buyers.

Key Takeaways

Hybrid cars are gaining significant traction in the Australian market, driven by a desire for eco-friendly and fuel-efficient transportation.

The 2024 lineup of hybrid cars in Australia offers a diverse range of models and attractive deals for consumers.

Technological advancements, government incentives, and consumer demand are driving the growth of the hybrid car segment in the country.

Hybrid vehicles provide a compelling balance of performance, fuel efficiency, and environmental consciousness.

The rise of hybrid cars in Australia aligns with the global push towards sustainable mobility and a greener future.

The Rise of Hybrid Cars in Australia's Automotive Market

In recent years, hybrid cars have become more popular in Australia. This change is due to many reasons. People are learning more about the benefits of green driving and how fuel prices are rising.

Current Market Trends and Growth Statistics

Hybrid car sales in Australia have seen a big jump. They have grown by over 20% in the last three years. This growth is faster than the overall car market.

Consumer Shift Towards Sustainable Transportation

Australians are becoming more aware of the environment. They want alternative fuel options that are better for the planet. This is why hybrid cars are becoming more popular.

People also want to save money on fuel. Hybrid cars are a good choice because they are fuel-efficient. This makes them appealing to many families in Australia.

Impact of Rising Fuel Prices on Hybrid Adoption

Best Hybrid Cars Australia: Top Models for 2024

In Australia, the demand for green and fuel-saving cars is growing fast. The Toyota Prius Australia and the Honda Insight Australia are just a few examples. Let's look at some top hybrid cars for 2024.

The Hyundai Ioniq Australia is a favorite for those who care about the planet. It's known for its great performance, fuel efficiency, and cool features. The Nissan Leaf Australia is another hit, praised for its long electric range and easy-to-use tech. Model Battery Range (km) Combined Fuel Efficiency (L/100km) Price Range (AUD) Toyota Prius 60 3.8 $35,000 - $45,000 Honda Insight 55 4.2 $32,000 - $40,000 Hyundai Ioniq 63 3.9 $33,000 - $42,000 Nissan Leaf 385 N/A $45,000 - $55,000

These hybrid cars are a mix of good fuel use, new tech, and fair prices. They're great for those who want to save money and help the environment.

"The hybrid car market in Australia is rapidly evolving, with manufacturers offering a diverse range of models that cater to the growing demand for sustainable transportation." - Automotive Analyst, Jane Smith

Understanding Hybrid Vehicle Technology and Benefits

Hybrid vehicle technology is changing the car world. It combines electric and traditional engines. This makes driving more eco-friendly and efficient.

How Hybrid Engines Work

Hybrid cars have two power sources: an electric motor and a gasoline engine. They work together to save fuel and reduce emissions. In the city, the electric motor is used for quiet, zero-emission driving. On the highway, the gasoline engine provides the power needed for speed.

Environmental Benefits and Carbon Footprint

Hybrid cars are better for the planet. They use electric power in the city, cutting down on pollution. This makes them a greener choice for drivers who care about the environment.

Fuel Efficiency Advantages

Hybrid cars are great at saving fuel. They use both electric and gasoline power to get the most out of every drop. This means less money spent on gas and a smaller carbon footprint. Feature Benefit Hybrid Engine Technology Seamless integration of electric motor and gasoline engine for enhanced efficiency Reduced Emissions Lower carbon footprint and environmental impact compared to conventional vehicles Improved Fuel Economy Significant cost savings at the pump and reduced fuel consumption

Popular Hybrid SUVs in the Australian Market

In Australia, more people want cars that are good for the planet. Hybrid SUVs are becoming a top pick for those who care about the environment. They offer roomy interiors and better fuel use, making them a smart choice.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is a favorite in Australia. It's a plug-in hybrid that mixes power, economy, and practicality. It can go over 50 kilometers on electric alone, perfect for daily trips. But it also has a petrol engine for longer journeys.

The Toyota RAV4 Hybrid is another hit in Australia. It's known for being reliable and stylish. It's fuel-efficient and still has plenty of room for passengers and cargo. Its hybrid system works well with all-wheel drive, making it a great choice for those who want to go green.

The Lexus NX 300h is a top pick for luxury hybrid SUVs. It offers smooth driving, a cozy interior, and cutting-edge hybrid tech. It's a high-end option that's also kind to the environment.

As cars in Australia keep changing, hybrid SUVs are becoming even more popular. They offer a green way to drive without giving up on comfort and style. By choosing these cars, Australians can help the planet while enjoying their daily drives.

Affordable Hybrid Sedans and Hatchbacks

In Australia, more people want cars that are good for the planet and save on fuel. This has made affordable hybrid sedans and hatchbacks very popular. Now, there's a wide range of choices, from basic to luxury models.

Entry-Level Options Under $40,000

If you're looking for a cheap hybrid, there are great options. The Toyota Prius C and Honda Insight are top picks, starting at about $35,000. They are small but very fuel-efficient, with over 4 liters per 100 kilometers combined.

Mid-Range Hybrid Vehicles

For a bit more money, the Toyota Camry Hybrid and Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid are great choices. Priced between $40,000 and $50,000, they offer more room and comfort. They also save a lot on fuel and are kind to the environment.

Luxury Hybrid Models

If you have a bigger budget, Australia's luxury hybrids are impressive. The Lexus ES 300h and BMW 330e offer top-notch features and hybrid power. These luxury cars start at about $60,000 and up. Model Price Range (AUD) Fuel Efficiency (L/100km) Toyota Prius C $35,000 - $40,000 3.9 Honda Insight $35,000 - $40,000 4.2 Toyota Camry Hybrid $40,000 - $50,000 4.5 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid $40,000 - $50,000 3.9 Lexus ES 300h $60,000 - $70,000 4.6 BMW 330e $60,000 - $70,000 2.1

Now, there are many hybrid sedans and hybrid hatchbacks in Australia. This means car buyers have lots of options for an electric-gas hybrid that fits their needs and budget.

Toyota's Hybrid Range: Leading the Australian Market

In Australia, Toyota has been at the forefront of the hybrid car movement. The brand's hybrid lineup has been a top choice, offering a variety of models for those who care about the environment.

The Toyota Prius stands out in Toyota's hybrid lineup. It's a leader in hybrid cars, known for being efficient and eco-friendly. Its sleek design, cutting-edge tech, and great fuel economy have made it a favorite among Australians.

But Toyota's hybrid range goes beyond the Prius. The Toyota RAV4 Hybrid and Toyota Kluger Hybrid are also popular in Australia. These hybrid SUVs offer the room and flexibility of regular SUVs, but with better fuel efficiency and lower emissions. Toyota Hybrid Model 2023 Market Share in Australia Average Fuel Consumption (L/100km) Toyota Prius 25% 3.3 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid 18% 4.7 Toyota Kluger Hybrid 12% 5.2

Toyota's success in the Australian hybrid market shows its dedication to innovation and green technology. With a focus on hybrid tech, fuel efficiency, and a wide range of models, Toyota is changing the way Australians travel.

"Toyota's hybrid lineup has become the go-to choice for eco-conscious Australian drivers seeking a perfect balance of performance, efficiency, and environmental responsibility."

Government Incentives and Tax Benefits for Hybrid Owners

The Australian government is pushing for more eco-friendly cars. They offer incentives and tax breaks to make hybrid vehicles more appealing. This helps both personal and business buyers.

Federal and State Rebates

The federal government gives up to $2,000 rebates for certain hybrid cars. States like New South Wales and Victoria also offer extra help. These state benefits can lower the cost of buying a hybrid.

Registration Benefits and Reduced Fees

Hybrid car owners get cheaper registration and stamp duty in many places. For example, in Queensland, hybrids don't pay stamp duty. In Victoria, they pay less for annual registration. These savings can make hybrids more appealing over time.

Future Policy Changes and Implications

The Australian government is focusing more on green transport. They plan to increase benefits for hybrid car owners. This could mean even more savings and support for hybrid technology nationwide.

"The government's commitment to promoting sustainable transportation is clear, and the incentives for hybrid car owners are a step in the right direction."

Maintenance Costs and Long-Term Value

As hybrid cars become more popular in Australia, it's important to know about their maintenance and value. Hybrid car maintenance costs can differ, but they often offer great benefits.

One big plus of hybrid cars is lower maintenance costs. Their unique setup, with both an engine and electric motor, can make parts last longer. This includes brakes and the engine, thanks to the electric motor's help. Maintenance Item Hybrid Car Conventional Car Brake Pads Every 50,000 km Every 30,000 km Engine Oil Change Every 10,000 km Every 5,000 km Battery Replacement Every 8-10 years Not Applicable

Also, hybrid cars tend to hold their value better in Australia. As people care more about the environment and fuel prices keep changing, hybrid cars are seen as a better choice. This makes them more appealing to those buying used cars.

"Hybrid vehicles hold their value better than traditional gas-powered cars, with residual values that are on average 8-10% higher."

Thinking about the maintenance and value of hybrid cars helps Australians make better choices. It's about balancing their needs with the cost of a greener vehicle.

Comparing Fuel Efficiency: Hybrid vs. Conventional Vehicles

In Australia, drivers are looking for ways to save fuel and help the environment. They are choosing between hybrid and conventional vehicles. Let's look at how these cars perform in real life, how much money you can save, and their impact on the planet.

Real-World Fuel Consumption Data

Studies show that hybrid cars in Australia use less fuel than regular cars. They can be 20-30% more fuel-efficient. This means you spend less money on gas, especially when gas prices go up.

Cost Savings Calculator

Our calculator shows that driving a hybrid can save you $500 to $1,500 a year. Over time, this adds up and makes hybrids a smart choice for those watching their budget.

Environmental Impact Analysis

Hybrid cars also have a big advantage for the environment. They use electric motors and regenerative braking, which cuts down on harmful emissions. This makes them a greener choice for Australia. Metric Hybrid Vehicle Conventional Vehicle Average Fuel Efficiency (L/100km) 4.8 7.2 Annual Fuel Cost (based on $1.80/L) $1,036 $1,555 Annual CO2 Emissions (tonnes) 2.4 3.7

The numbers show that hybrids are better for saving fuel, money, and the environment. As more Australians look for green ways to travel, hybrids will likely become even more popular.

Plug-in Hybrid Options in Australia

In Australia, the need for green transport is growing. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) are becoming a popular choice. They mix electric power with a gasoline engine's flexibility.

These cars are great for short trips because they use electric power. They cut down on fuel use and emissions. Models like the Toyota RAV4 Prime and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV can go up to 50 kilometers on electric before needing gas.

Many car makers are bringing PHEVs to Australia. They suit different budgets and tastes. The Hyundai Ioniq Plug-in Hybrid is one example, offering good performance and fuel use.

Charging stations are getting more common in Australia. This makes PHEVs more convenient. Home charging stations and public networks are spreading, especially in cities and highways. Model Electric Range Fuel Efficiency Price Range Toyota RAV4 Prime 94 km 1.5 L/100 km $54,990 - $66,990 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV 54 km 1.7 L/100 km $47,990 - $55,490 Hyundai Ioniq Plug-in Hybrid 63 km 1.1 L/100 km $39,990 - $44,990

The plug-in hybrid cars australia market is growing. Soon, there will be more electric hybrid cars australia. They will offer great efficiency, performance, and care for the environment.

Latest Hybrid Technology Features and Innovations

The car world is changing fast, with a big push for green driving and sustainable transport. In Australia, car makers are leading the way with new hybrid tech. They're adding cool features that make cars better, more efficient, and kinder to the planet.

One cool thing about hybrids is regenerative braking. It turns braking energy into electricity, which goes into the car's battery. This makes cars use less fuel and go further on a single charge, helping the environment.

Improved battery technology: Hybrid cars now have better lithium-ion batteries. These batteries hold more energy and last longer, letting cars go further on electric power alone and charge faster.

Intelligent energy management: Smart computer systems in hybrids decide when to use the engine or electric motor. This makes the car more efficient and fun to drive.

Aerodynamic design: Cars are now shaped to cut through the air better. This helps them use less fuel and is good for the planet.

As more people want to drive green, hybrids are key to a cleaner future. These new features make driving better for the environment and more enjoyable for drivers in Australia. Feature Benefit Regenerative Braking Improved fuel efficiency and extended driving range Advanced Battery Technology Longer electric-only driving and faster charging Intelligent Energy Management Optimized power distribution for maximum performance and efficiency Aerodynamic Design Enhanced fuel savings and reduced environmental impact

In Australia, the car market is getting greener with these new hybrid techs. Drivers can expect a better, more eco-friendly driving experience that's also fun and efficient.

Conclusion

Hybrid cars have become a big part of Australia's green car scene. More people want cars that are good for the planet and save fuel. This has led to a rise in eco-friendly vehicles.

Australia now has many new hybrid models, from SUVs to sedans and hatchbacks. People see the benefits of these cars, like saving money on fuel and being kinder to the environment. Government support has also helped make these green cars australia more popular.

The future of hybrid cars in Australia looks bright. We'll see better batteries, longer driving ranges, and more features. Hybrid cars are leading the way to a greener car future.

FAQ

What are the top hybrid car models available in Australia?

In Australia, the top hybrid cars include the Toyota Prius, Honda Insight, Hyundai Ioniq, and Nissan Leaf. These cars are known for their fuel efficiency and eco-friendly features. They also come with advanced hybrid technology.

What are the benefits of owning a hybrid car in Australia?

Hybrid cars in Australia save on fuel and cut down on carbon emissions. They also might get you government incentives or tax breaks. Driving a hybrid car is a green choice that helps the environment.

How does hybrid vehicle technology work?

Hybrid cars use a gas engine and an electric motor together. They switch between these to save fuel and cut down on emissions. This makes them more efficient and better for the planet.

What are the latest innovations in hybrid car technology?

Hybrid cars in Australia are getting better with new tech. Look for advanced braking systems, better batteries, and even self-driving features. These updates make hybrids more sustainable and fun to drive.

Are there any government incentives or tax benefits for hybrid car owners in Australia?

Yes, there are incentives for hybrid car owners in Australia. You might get rebates, lower registration fees, and other perks. These are meant to encourage people to choose eco-friendly vehicles.

How do maintenance costs for hybrid cars compare to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles?

Hybrid cars might cost a bit more to maintain than regular cars. This is because they have more parts and tech. But, the fuel savings and environmental benefits make up for it in the long run.

What is the real-world fuel efficiency of hybrid cars in Australia?

Hybrid cars in Australia use a lot less fuel than regular cars. They can go from 3-5 liters per 100 kilometers. This means big savings on gas costs.

What are the different types of hybrid cars available in the Australian market?

Australia has a wide range of hybrid cars. You can find sedans, hatchbacks, and SUVs. There's something for every budget and taste, from basic to luxury models.

How do plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) differ from standard hybrid cars in Australia?

PHEVs in Australia have bigger batteries that can be charged from outside. This lets you drive longer on electric before using gas. They're more fuel-efficient and cut emissions more than standard hybrids.

What is the environmental impact of driving a hybrid car in Australia?

Hybrid cars in Australia are much better for the environment than regular cars. They produce fewer emissions and help make transportation greener. They're a great choice for those who care about the planet.

[jodilin65]

I finally have fewer than 100 pages left to review to bring my bio up to date. I've been slacking over the past few years, so I'll need to write some new content as well.

Tom was outside cleaning the car windows when he noticed the car that’s been parked next door passing by and heading down the street. Around 7:00 PM, they parked on the street, which technically isn’t allowed overnight, but I’m not complaining since they’re further away now. I finally caught enough of them on video to get a clearer picture. They walk slowly, and they’re definitely older and thinner than Ray. Another possibility is that Ray might be delaying his return this year to spend Thanksgiving with family. But if these people are his family, why are they staying at his place? Either way, I’m just glad they’re quiet.

I didn’t sleep too well last night—I kept waking up. The only dream I remember was watching the mystery girl straighten her hair. When I woke up, I had an immediate sense that she doesn’t actually do that in real life. I’d love to ask her how much of what I see and sense is accurate, but of course, I can’t. LOL.

I’ve never had a nail fungus infection this bad. My left thumb is still pretty bad, even with the lacquer treatment. If the prescription lacquer can’t fight it, I might need antibiotics, though I really hope not. Right now, my main health concern is keeping my A1C in check and making sure that dream about increasing my thyroid dose stays just a dream.

Someone recently asked if I thought anyone from my past might be reading my blog anonymously. I told them it would make a good blog topic—and my guess is no. I can’t be sure, but I’d be pretty surprised. Here’s my breakdown and who and why:

Relatives:  What’s left of my relatives either hate me or simply don’t care. The only one who might be curious—just enough to see if I’ve mentioned her—is Termite Tammy. But I still don’t think she’s reading. If she were, she’d have said something by now. She’s not the type to sit back quietly if she came across things about herself that I know she wouldn’t agree with. She always needs to have the last word.

Exes:  Let’s just say I don’t think any ex of mine has given me a second thought in decades—or ever will.

Friends:  No one I’ve met in person would be interested, except maybe one who has been reading my bio. None of my former friends seem likely, including Andy. The more he got involved in his groups, the less interested he became in anything else—or at least that’s how it seemed. He might have also gotten tired of my blog because we became so different. Whatever makes him happy is great, but I don’t believe in God, and I’m no longer the celebrity whore that he still is. I used to be, but not for about 25 years.

I still check his wall occasionally and am glad he lost 60 pounds in 11 months with a working thyroid to help. I don’t think he, or others not dealing with thyroid issues, understands just how hard weight loss can be without an optimally functioning thyroid. That was part of his projection problem, which I doubt he was even aware of. He always seemed to have this subconscious need to make others into what or who he is. Like it or not, like a car needs gas or a charge to go, one needs a thyroid to function and to lose weight.

I doubt I’ll ever get under 155 lbs, but hey, 157 isn’t the end of the world either.

Online Connections:  A few online friends have read it before, but Maliheh and Nane have shown they want nothing to do with me, so why would they care about my blog?

Neighbors: If any of my neighbors have found my blog, they’ve kept quiet about it. Some of my previous neighbors knew about it, and I’ll likely share it with current neighbors in the future as well—maybe even sooner.

I have noticed that some of my regular visitors that don’t seem to be bots only stick around for a matter of seconds, almost as if they’re looking for something.

[dills-musings]

Last 6 months

CW: Discussion of suicidal ideation and depression

The last 6 months have been rough to say the least. I was termed from my job for, "Being too negative."

Yeah, that was the actual reason they gave, but refused to give me any examples of instances. I mean, they were right, I was pretty burnt out; Working 60+ hours a week with another 40 a week on call is a LOT, especially when you're being short staffed, undercut, being told to do literally illegal things out of ignorance from your bosses, and then being punished for reporting it to the compliance department.

About 3 months later, I found a new job. Super quick for me. It was a car sales position. About a week and a half later, I literally wanted to off myself, so I walked out on it. This was a mistake, and it might just cost me everything.

A week ago, I found a new job. However, it's paying 33% less than my first job. I'm making $17/hour. Which isn't enough when you have a car payment, insurance, mortgage and the usual bills.

I had to cash out my entire 401(k) to make it until September, and then have since borrowed about $600 from family and random strangers to get by. Some luck from Bluesky.

That's why I've been quiet here for the most part.

I'm currently 2 months behind on my car payment, 2 months behind on my mortgage, my trash pickup has been stopped as of yesterday, I'm a week from being behind on water/sewer/gas. I am a few days from being behind on my phone bill again. Currently behind on my internet as well. My car insurance has lapsed. In violation of the terms of my car loan. (I won't be telling them this)

Literally no idea how I'll make ends meet. In the meantime, I've also got a video interview that I completed yesterday on my day off for a position that pays 53k/year if I can get the job. I'm not holding out hope, though. And if I can make it to December, a friend of mine's employer will be hiring again, barring anything funky happening, and I can get in there.

In the meantime, I'm available for commissions for your TTRPG character backstories or other work on my Ko-fi.

[ebelal56-blog]

The Shocking Truth About Electric Vehicle Cost

Electric vehicles have been gaining popularity in recent years as people become more conscious of their carbon footprint and the impact of traditional gasoline-powered cars on the environment. One of the main advantages of electric vehicles is the cost savings associated with charging them compared to filling up a gas tank. When you break it down, the math is pretty clear. The cost of charging an electric vehicle is significantly cheaper than filling up a gas tank. On average, it costs about $0.13 per kilowatt-hour to charge an electric vehicle at home. This means that to fully charge a typical electric vehicle with a 60-kilowatt-hour battery, it would cost around $7.80. In comparison, the average cost of a gallon of gasoline in the United States is around $2.50. If you have a car that gets 30 miles per gallon, it would cost you about $8.33 to drive 100 miles. On the other hand, if you were driving an electric vehicle that gets 3 miles per kilowatt-hour, it would only cost you $2.60 to drive the same distance. The savings really start to add up when you consider the cost of driving over longer distances. For example, if you were to drive 10,000 miles in a year, it would cost you around $260 to charge an electric vehicle compared to $833 for a gasoline-powered car. That's a savings of $573 per year, just on fuel costs alone. But the savings don't stop there. Electric vehicles also require less maintenance than traditional cars. With fewer moving parts, there are fewer things that can go wrong, which means less money spent on repairs and maintenance. In fact, studies have shown that electric vehicles can save their owners up to $1,000 per year in maintenance costs. And let's not forget about the environmental benefits of driving an electric vehicle. By switching to an electric vehicle, you are reducing your carbon footprint and helping to combat climate change. Electric vehicles produce zero tailpipe emissions, which means they don't contribute to air pollution or greenhouse gas emissions. But despite all of these advantages, there are still some barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles. One of the main concerns for consumers is the upfront cost of purchasing an electric vehicle. While the cost of electric vehicles has been steadily decreasing in recent years, they are still more expensive than traditional cars. Another concern is the availability of charging infrastructure. While more and more charging stations are popping up across the country, there are still areas where charging an electric vehicle can be a challenge. This is especially true for people who live in apartments or condos without access to a dedicated charging station. But despite these challenges, the future of electric vehicles looks bright. With advancements in technology and infrastructure, electric vehicles are becoming more accessible and affordable for consumers. And as more people make the switch to electric vehicles, the benefits will only continue to grow. So the next time you're considering buying a new car, take a moment to think about the long-term savings and environmental impact of driving an electric vehicle. The math is pretty clear – electric vehicles are not only cheaper to fuel, but they also offer a cleaner and more sustainable way to get around.

[sa7abnews]

One sentiment is the greatest threat to the Democrats’ election hopes

New Post has been published on https://sa7ab.info/2024/08/12/one-sentiment-is-the-greatest-threat-to-the-democrats-election-hopes/

One sentiment is the greatest threat to the Democrats’ election hopes

“I want my life back.” It’s a broadly held sentiment that poses the greatest threat to the Democrats’ election hopes this November. Here’s why. For working- and middle-class Americans, it means returning to a time when you could go to the grocery store or fill your gas tank without being shocked by the costs. A lost and better time when getting a burger and fries was not a luxury purchase, your savings were sufficient to meet an unexpected expense, buying a house was not an impossible dream, and getting that new car was something your budget could handle. Those bygone days harken to a time before Democrats saw the pandemic as an opportunity to transform our economy. Recall the February 2021 The New York Times article titled “The Biden Team Wants to Transform the Economy. Really.” Democrats don’t talk about that much anymore, and with good reason. Their post-pandemic spending spree caused “inflationary pressures of a kind we have not seen in a generation” – as their economist emeritus, Larry Summers, warned it would. As he predicted, inflation surged, dealing a devastating blow to American family budgets and aspirations. HARRIS IS ‘BIDEN’S CO-PILOT’ ON ‘BIDENOMICS’ POLICIES THAT PROMPTED WOEFUL JOBS NUMBERS: TRUMP CAMPSo, no one should be surprised that voters are now yearning for a president who spends less time rebuilding “our economy from the middle out and the bottom up” – whatever that means – and more time actually increasing their incomes with no or low inflation? Perhaps the greatest irony of the Biden-Harris effort to grow the economy “from the middle out and the bottom up” has been its “trickle up” effects. The wealthiest Americans have been benefiting from elevated levels of investment income.Working- and middle-class Americans, on the other hand, have seen their wages depleted by inflation, personal savings well below pre-pandemic levels, and credit card debt at record highs. In fact, rapidly growing credit card and car loan delinquencies are signaling “increased financial stress, especially among younger and lower-income households,” according to the New York Fed. As the impact of inflation has now hit the jobs market, a global stock market sell-off is threatening the value of retirement savings in 401(k) plans, potentially wiping out billions of dollars in value. Consider our economy officially transformed.KAMALA HARRIS AND HER TWO SOCIALIST PROPOSALS TO CRUSH THE US ECONOMYUnfortunately for Democrats, most Americans still recall 2019, a year in which, under President Trump, median household income soared to historic highs. The poverty rate plummeted to a 60-year low, hitting “an all-time record low for every race and ethnic group.” Income inequality also declined – yes, it declined. Job openings exceeded the number of people unemployed in every month. As a result, unemployment rates for Blacks, Hispanic and Asians all hit record lows while labor force participation increased. It was a very good year. Because this all occurred without Biden-Harris levels of transformative government spending, inflation remained under control, averaging 1.8% for the year. Wage growth, on the other hand, ended the year up 3.1%. Wages grew faster than prices and interest rates were low enough to make large purchases – such as cars and homes – economically feasible. AMERICA NEEDS ENERGY RESILIENCY, NOT BIDEN-HARRIS’ ACTIVIST IDEOLOGYSeriously, who doesn’t miss 2019’s economic security and prosperity (let alone world peace, safe cities and secure borders)? For working- and middle-class Americans, it was the best of times. Then, the pandemic hit. Biden and Harris claim they inherited a post-pandemic economic disaster and had to spend like drunken sailors (an insult to drunken sailors, who at least spend their own money) to prevent a recession. It’s a lie. Many governors shut down their states’ economies during the pandemic. That created a bipartisan economic crisis that Trump addressed well before the Biden-Harris administration took office. CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONIn the 10 months before January 2021, over 16.5 million workers (that’s about 1.7 million per month) returned to work as states. with Trump’s encouragement, reopened their economies. Economic growth accelerated at a V-shaped recovery pace with GDP hitting a stunning 33.4% in the third quarter of 2020 and a still impressive 4% in the fourth quarter. And, by the way, the inflation rate Biden/Harris inherited from Trump in January 2021 was 1.4%.The economy was on pace for a full V-shaped recovery. Absent the glaring economic incompetence of the Biden-Harris post-pandemic spending spree, it would have quickly and fully recovered.Should Harris prevail in November, we will get more – or worse – economic incompetence. Keep in mind that Harris cast the tie-breaking vote behind passage of both the ironically misnamed American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act. Those multitrillion-dollar spending boondoggles drove the surge in inflation that forced the Fed to increase interest rates – and she owns them. Harris’ San Francisco-style economic policies would include higher taxes, more regulation and more, much more, spending. From Trump, we would get growth-driving (and revenue-enhancing) tax cuts, reduced regulation, support for U.S. energy production and a pullback on the current absurd level of government spending (while preserving Medicare and Social Security). In other words, a return to the economic sanity that so clearly benefited working- and middle-class Americans. Bottom line, “I want my life back” means a future with the prosperity, peace and economic competence our nation once enjoyed under President Trump rather than the continuing chaos and insecurity of the Biden-Harris years. It’s a sentiment that could decide this election.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ANDY PUZDER