#fusion terms

[alicedollita]

(•﹏•)⠀demifusion ! ☆

[PT: demi-fusion]

defintion : when you are partially fused with another headmate within a system ( sys exclusive term )

[[ note: i don't have a dni, but i block freely! syscourse under this post will be blocked ]]

tagging �� @radiomogai @io-archival

[puppetmaster13u]

Prompt 301

Ellie, during one of her stints of what do I do with my life right now, decides to, with the help of her Original Dad-Person (Look he’s aging and she’s not and it gets less questions the older he gets if he says daughter instead of sister with how the Fentons are getting older too) creates a Boo-Tube channel. No, not a Youtube channel, those are stuck to a single dimension.

Bootube on the other hand? Due to being through the Realms (and wow is Tucker getting so much income from creating it) is interdimensional. Which is so cool honestly. And she doesn’t know what to do at first, and honestly there’s already so many travel blogs that she kind of just… decided to do something that she wished someone had done for her and her brothers and Danny when she was new to the world. 

So she creates the channel CAAW: Clone Awareness, Accommodations, and Welfare. They had to learn things through trial and error, but maybe she can help someone out there learn how to find their own selves, or even help someone not melt. 

[orb-weaving]

Recognition

[keejot-arts]

wolfwood wednesday monday

[kobandan]

A while ago, during emmet month, I did the fusion of Eelektross/Emmet (I take the opportunity to reupload it here as well hehe), so I thought about doing one as well for Ingo with Chandelure ! I know people have already done it, but I wanted to give my take on it.

Also a little clean sketch bonus of both of them together;

[the-masquerade-council]

-formed

A suffix referring to how or why a specific alter formed, view themself as having formed, and/or are viewed by others in-system, in their system. For example 'Stressformed', would refer to an alter that formed because another alter(s) or the (sub)system as a whole was under stress.

They can also have to do with the alter's feeling about why they exist. For example, an Introject who died in source may consider themself to have been reborn into the system, and as such consider themself 'rebirthformed' ,or similar.

Sub terms under read more

-splitformed

We know that some systems use the term split to refer to any time an alter formed in the system. However we use to specifically refer to new alters that split from already know alters in the system, this often will result in something of the original alter being taken to the new one. I will be using split how we(my system) typically use it, in this post. Example 'griefsplitformed'(shorted to griefsplit) would be an alter that split because of, to deal with, and/or to hold, another alter's grief.

-fuseformed

This would refer to an alter that formed as they are now do to the fusion of alters. For an example 'fearfuseformed'(shorted to fearfused) would be an alter that formed by fusion because of fear.

-wakeformed

An alter the come out of dormancy, and they leaving dormancy is seen as formation for any reason. For example 'ragewakeformed'(shorted to ragewaked) would be an alter that come of dormancy because rage, in a way that is viewed as formation.

-nowPCformed

An alter the formed from a NPC. For example traumanowPCformed(shorted to traumanowPC), would be a NPC that became an alter because, someone in the system/the system went through a new traumatic event or was reminded of past traumas.

All of these suffixes can also be used in combination with role term, in reference to alter that formed for a specific role regardless if they still are that role or not. For example protectorformed is an alter that was originally formed to be a protector, they may or may not still be one.

This was with complex dissociative disorder systems who don't like using "-genic" to describe individual alters(cough cough us) in mind

[horizon-penblade-art]

has anyone done this yet

[image ID: drawings of gem versions of the hermitcraft recap team. pix is a dumortierite, sloy/zloy is an unakite, and lyarrah is an anyolite.]

[maxphilippa]

Finals start today.

always late to the party but hey! look! daildy dads content but halloween content. mic is like... 8 years old here. Based on a Jack Stauber thing.

[ecos-syscourse]

"Stop saying traumagenic" this "endos are" that

What about us?

We're a non-disordered traumagenic system.

We have a system formed from trauma, but we don't have a diagnosis—we don't have a CDD.

so please remember that we exist when you form your opinions ^^

[system-of-a-feather]

Can you talk a little about what your post-fusion plurality is like? Coming from the perspective of current CDD, I can't really imagine it? Just anything you think of. Thanks! :)

There is honestly a LOT about it particularly in the ways it differs from our plurality that was back when we actually qualified for a CDD (we've healed enough we probably don't even qualify for DPDR because we rarely dissociate outside of explicit larger trauma triggers).

Like I said in this post, our system members have not changed at all - at least the system that was present when we stabilized and hit functional multiplicity a while ago. We have vaguely found parts we weren't aware of, but I say vaguely as we assumed they were there, we just didn't know much about them or even that they were CERTAINLY there. It isn't as though we fused, all parts disappeared, and then we re-created plurality.

It's more so that we fused and continued practicing all the internal work, active and intentional communication, and did little to change how our social circles engaged with us and thus those that interacted and were aware of us as parts were more than free to still call out parts and talk to / about them as if they were still there because - even as a fused whole - they were still there and could speak for themselves. As a result, we still fully can interact with ourselves as parts and still can fully operate as any of the parts individually should we 1) want to and 2) that part specifically wanted to. It's actually something we do pretty often as we feel the interest to do so because there is a lot of understanding to ourselves and our life that we can get by exploring it through a very specific perspective and life view.

I think the fact that we CAN fuse and often operate as a fused whole is what caused the way our plurality works to change from a CDD structure to honestly what I imagine is more similar to an endogenic / willogenic system.

I think one of the best ways to describe it is that was post-fusion plurality, there is a very clear and established identity of the system and the whole. Who we are is extremely well understood, conceptually consistent, and complete between all parts with zero conflict and zero need to even talk about; its intuitive, constant and always in the background. And this second bit might just be more about me being Buddhist than anything else, but that identity is very much not a "person" or a "self" or a concept; its arguably even less so than any specific part or alter, as much as it is just the simple way of our existence that we are all a part of. Sure that identity has a name, freely uses "I / me / my" and often is completely running our life, but it REALLY is not this entity or sentient thing in the least because it's incredibly simply just "the way we are". Our identity that is our fused whole very much is not "another part" or a "fused part" because that implies a lot of things that it really isn't; its kind of just a resting baseline, but we know what it is, we know what it means and what it needs. We can VERY easily rest in this baseline and know what we want when making decisions and living.

This compares against our experience with CDD plurality (which is what I'm choosing to call pre-fusion plurality for now for the sake of just readability), we always were one part or the next; and those parts had their distinct unique opinions and views in life that were a lot more concrete and rigid to each part. The parts were very sentient, very vocal, and it was constantly one part or the next or just DEEP dissociation. Also, there was VERY little understanding or familiarity with a sense of identity as a whole / as a system, enough so that it was always a fun "haha what would that even BE like lol" conversation where we would do silly pointless mental math about each of our personality and trying to average it out. Our collective identity was hardly a real concept beyond "The System of a Feather" and a few things we all generally kind of liked. It was incredibly hard to NOT experience only a singular part at a time.

So with all that, a lot of the time with CDD plurality, we were very frequently operating on consitently changing rigid / established world views and personalities and interests; we were very distinctly individuals and people. With post-fusion plurality, we are operating on a changing yet VERY consistent fluid sense of self that really didn't think or hold onto any real strong / firm world views or anything; its a very stable, very fluid, very constant sense of self and being.

With that stable fluidity and the "changing yet consistent sense of self" comes with a large ability to completely sway into one view or the next without really having that strong sense of individualism / self / sense of internal rigidity and attachment to a specific world view, personality, perspective, and interests.

In the same ways, we can go into those same perspectives, world views and interests that we did with CDD plurality, but instead of it being this Individual part, that part exists as a large Wave in the ocean that is us rather than being it's own lake. Its like letting one head of a hydra speak rather than teleporting between different dragon bodies.

It's kind of hard to explain in words, but thats just kind of a start to it maybe?

[inspectorcosmo]

Batwheels x Incredibox Abgerny

Redbird - Peter 🐷 

Kitty - Carl 🐱

Nightbike - Zee 🐝

Jestah - Marvin 🐍

Grundy - Frank 🐸

Bam - Paul 🐻‍❄️

ADAM - Ethan 🐘 

Goldie - Birdo 🐦 

Crash - Shaun 🐌 

Buff - Amy 🦎 (there’s no axolotl emoji ;n;)

Quizz - Vurr 🦊

Batwing - Barry 🦇 

Prank - Wally 🐺 

Bibi - Kori 🐭

Voice Box - Molly 🦋

MOE - Rainbow Flower 

Ducky - Juan 🐐 

Snowy - Benson 🐰 

Batcomputer - Bearrito 🐻

Badcomputer - William 🦌

[xuexishijian]

So the other day I posted some linguistics terms vocab, basic terms that I was curious about. And I looked up “dialect” and my dictionary gave me 方言 fāngyán, which I didn’t really question. Like fine, sure, “local speech,” that makes sense as what we call “dialect” in English.

But I just watched this lecture on YouTube called “How Fangyan became Dialects” by historian Dr. Gina Anne Tam and turns out that’s a very loaded assumption! Because basically there’s a long history of the sort of mismatch(?) between western terms for describing linguistic varieties (languages, dialects, vernaculars, etc etc) and those used in China. I’d definitely heard other Chinese languages such as Cantonese or Hokkien described as dialects, and this mistranslation or misrepresentation of 方言 is a major part of this problem.

The idea of language vs. dialect is a complex one, and these terms in Chinese languages don’t map 1-to-1 onto existing European-language ones. Linguists in the 19th and 20th century struggled with this and often made comparisons to what they knew from Europe, imposing distinctions and hierarchies that didn’t necessarily exist prior. Language and nationalism in Europe during these years is also super interesting and something I’ve read some about, and it makes sense then that westerners would be confused by a country with many forms of speaking when Europe was (and still is?) drawing up borders along linguistic+national+ethnic lines.

The development of nationalism in China through the 20th century led to further changes in the idea of a national language, especially with the promotion of first 國語 in the Republican era and 普通话 under the Communist government.

It’s interesting that what used to be a term for a region’s language can now be used in a hierarchical way to subordinate certain linguistic varieties to others. Dr. Tam mentioned that there was an article that generated controversy years ago that said that since Cantonese was a 方言 that is wasn’t fit to be taught and couldn’t be considered anyone’s 母语 mǔyǔ (mother language), that instead all Chinese people must learn and use 普通话, the national standard. This idea of course coming from the implications that 方言 now has, that it’s “merely” a dialect, that dialects aren’t “full” languages, that they’re inferior or incomplete or whatever.

Dr. Tam had a nicer way of phrasing this, but terminology is so important because these definitions—which may seem inconsequential, like we’re squabbling over minor issues that mean little—influence how we perceive and think, which in turn influences how we interact with the world. If a 方言 is just a dialect, and dialects are lower than languages, and Cantonese is a 方言, that means Cantonese is lesser. That’s a “logical” conclusion one can make, just a syllogism of X is Y, Y is Z, therefore X is Z (Cantonese is a 方言, 方言 is lesser, Cantonese is lesser). But that “logical” conclusion starts from a very very flawed premise, this definition which presupposes a hierarchy that doesn’t really exist linguistically (but then does exist socially and is justified by these “scientific” or “logical” reasons).

All that to say, this was a super interesting lecture (about her book that I might have to read!) and if you have time I would totally recommend giving it a watch. These terms are interesting and complex and nuanced, and knowing more about the history is really enlightening. I’ve been getting into language and identity lately, reading a lot about nationalism and race and the idea of “native speakers.” It feels like, while in other areas we might have made social progress, that language is one area that many people are super unaware of and take for granted their own biases without understanding these power structures and their histories.

Anyways I’d be curious to hear what anyone else has to say on the topic! And definitely if you watch her lecture let me know what you think!

[superbellsubways]

people took that post way too seriously i stg IT WAS NEVER ABOUT FANDOM SHIPS OR ANYTHING im gonna cry. some people also took it as an Anti fankids post or something like i saw someone get sad over it NO thats not what its about

[chr0n1c-ag0ny]

Fyodor/Nikolai/Sigma, domestic au, but they are painfully slavic and living their best lives, is something that can be so personal.

(this post took forever cause I essentially had to make it twice. I didn't look at what blog I originally posted this to the first time round. shoot me)

[laika-of-the-stars]

that scene with cyn/the solver and uzi at the very end where the solver/cyn is still a part of uzi.... so OSSDID/System coded fr fr.... im going insane abt it. im so autistical abt this

please please PLEASE send me asks abt this i am so eager to talk to ppl abt it

(rambles in tags)

[chronicallyqueercoining2]

Librapunk:

[Pt: librapunk end pt]

(Definition and flag credit linked!)

Librapunk is a combination of genderpunk and librafluid.

Genderpunk: A colloquial term for a culture of resistance against gendernormativity; an identity that in and of itself is a resistance against gender norms, homophobia and transphobia, oppression, and societal status.

[Flag]

Librafluid is a gender identity in which one is mostly agender, but fluctuates between other genders. Librafluid is similar to genderfluid.

This means that librapunk is when one's gender fluctuates, but remains mostly agender, and that one fights against gendernormativity.

[Pt: This means that librapunk is when one's gender fluctuates, but remains mostly agender, and that one fights against gendernormativity. End pt]

Requested by: @mascspomax [ just so yk! TW for this user's account. Read pinned post before you look at this user's blog!!!]