#formation e-marketing

[omnischool]

[prosegalaxy]

The haunting whisper of an ancient past, A spirit born from shadows cast. In shadows of the moonlit night, A talent hidden from mortal sight. In distant lands and distant time, The echoes of a long-forgotten rhyme. A gift unveiled in eerie grace, Of weaving words, of haunting space. The whispers grow, they fill the air, As secrets of the past become clear. An ability revealed, so rare, In tapestry of history, they weave a tale so grand and rare.

[kachmedcom]

Supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS

Supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS

En tant que formateur, vous avez besoin de supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS. Ces référentiels définissent les compétences et les connaissances que les stagiaires doivent acquérir au cours de la formation.

Nos supports de formation répondent à ces exigences. Ils sont conçus par des experts pédagogiques et sont régulièrement mis à jour pour garantir leur conformité aux dernières évolutions des référentiels.

Les avantages de nos supports de formation:

Complets: Nos supports de formation couvrent l'ensemble des compétences et des connaissances requises par les référentiels RNCP et RS. Ils comprennent des contenus théoriques, des exercices pratiques et des évaluations.

Conformes: Nos supports de formation sont conformes aux dernières évolutions des référentiels RNCP et RS. Ils sont régulièrement mis à jour pour garantir leur pertinence.

Professionnels: Nos supports de formation sont conçus par des experts pédagogiques. Ils sont adaptés aux besoins des formateurs et des stagiaires.

Les bénéfices pour les formateurs:

Gain de temps: Nos supports de formation vous font gagner du temps dans la préparation de vos formations. Vous n'avez plus besoin de créer vos propres supports, ce qui vous permet de vous concentrer sur l'animation de la formation.

Qualité pédagogique: Nos supports de formation garantissent une qualité pédagogique optimale. Ils sont conçus pour favoriser l'apprentissage des stagiaires.

Satisfaction des stagiaires: Nos supports de formation contribuent à la satisfaction des stagiaires. Ils leur permettent d'acquérir les compétences et les connaissances requises.

Découvrez nos supports de formation

[digitechmediaa-blog]

Delve into Twitter's exploration of new monetization models and its efforts to enhance its advertising platform, uncovering strategies for increased revenue and a sustainable future.

[argentsurleweb]

Pourquoi créer un tunnel de vente avec Learnybox

Maximisez Vos Ventes en Ligne : Les Avantages Incontestables d’un Tunnel de Vente avec LearnyBox. Dans le monde en constante évolution du commerce en ligne, les entrepreneurs recherchent continuellement des moyens de stimuler leurs ventes et d’accroître leur chiffre d’affaires. C’est là que les tunnels de vente entrent en jeu, et lorsqu’il s’agit de créer des tunnels de vente performants,…

[merciecommerce]

Créez Votre Avenir Commercial avec Formation E-Commerce Lyon!

Découvrez les clés du succès dans le monde du commerce en ligne avec Formation E-Commerce Lyon. Notre programme complet et innovant vous guidera à travers les stratégies, les outils et les tendances les plus récentes de l'e-commerce.

[wheelsgoroundincircles]

Dodge Challenger T/A

Dodge Challenger T/A

Dodge Challenger T/A

The Trans American Sedan Championship came around in 1966, and it was mostly a Ford-Chevrolet turf war in its first five seasons, with no real competition from other manufacturers. The Z/28 and the Boss 302 (Camaro and Mustang) were clubbing each other over yonder, and Chrysler only bothered to rejoin the fun in 1970 after running only in the first two years.

1970 was the only year in the original Trans Am format when all pony car brands were represented on the tracks by factory-backed teams, thanks to the late arrival of the Plymouth-Dodge twins, the E-body Barracuda and Challenger. Mother Mopar didn’t impress, though, and the two siblings left the competition at the end of the season.

However, to run in Trans Am, all cars had to abide by the Sports Car Club of America rule, which stated that a minimum of 2,500 vehicles sold to the general public were required for the respective nameplate to be allowed to run on the street circuits. Since it was the only all-new car launched in 1970, the Dodge Challenger was replicated in a most desirable 340-cube Six-Pack form, the single-year Challenger T/A.

Although the rules were crystal clear about the production numbers required to homologate it, the 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A did not make the bar, stopping at 2,399 examples. That’s a rare Mopar, no matter how we look at it, and it usually draws attention, especially when one pops up for sale. But strangely, there’s one example in Utah that seems to fall short of buyer’s interest, given how it’s been on the market for ten weeks, and no one bought it.v

[jazzisthebestformofmusic]

Hey good evening

been a follower for 13 years now and going through my blog going through nostalgia . i was about to mass download your archive then i realized you had nsfw works as well deleted. if there's any chance you happen to have the full archive of your works i will be grateful

ill pay for reasonable price lol

I never collected rips of NSFW for anything past comedic effect, a lot of it is a deep dive into underpaid employee/mandated market fetishes. What you don't want to do is go to a something 'e' something 'hentai' .org all the while not using a group tag to reference the individual game companies that have the released ""game"" you're interested in. No matter how bad the quality of the game is those types of archivists will catalogue an entire game for a 10x10p tit.

Quality and availability is mixed. It's easy to identify an automated format rip (bit errors -> wrong palette) or 50% compressed jpg. Normal browsing etiquette and I haven't given my computer anthrax while saving autistic fueled searching of defunct Japanese websites. Without emulation and sourcing it's probably the most complete way I remember for the eroge parts of the eroge.

[linkablewritingadvice]

How much should it cost to be a writer?

It depends what route you’re taking. If you are planning to go for traditional publishing, which looks like you finishing a manuscript and then querying agents who will then take your book to publishers, you should be paying for basically nothing. One exception would be if you decide to hire an editor to get a pass over your manuscript and/or query package before sending it off, but this is not required.

If you are in the process of trying to get your manuscript traditionally published, you may be approached by a “publisher” offering to publish your manuscript for a fee. THIS IS A SCAM! An author should never be paying for “publishing services.” Anyone asking you to pay for your own printing, marketing, etc. costs is taking advantage of you. These are called vanity publishers and they will not turn you a profit, help you attract readers, or provide you the prestige of being published. 

Always check on Writer Beware - search for the name of the person or company. You can also just google that name along with the word “scam” or “reviews.” In general, don’t let yourself be blinded by dreams, or let yourself be convinced that something is a good idea because you really want it to be true. Never, ever, ever pay a publisher.

If you are going the self-publishing route, you will be paying for certain things, but none of those should be payment to be published. You are the publisher. Uploading your manuscript to Amazon or other marketplaces is free. However, you will be paying for things that a publisher typically pays for. This could include:

-Cover art - you could do this yourself, though this isn't recommended. A good cover is key to a book's success, so budget to purchase a pre-made book cover, or hire a professional cover artist.

To find pre-made book covers, you can just Google "premade book covers," or check one of these sites: BookCoverZone RockingBookCovers Beetiful

And here's a list of places to buy both custom and pre-made cover designs that's a good start. You can also check Reedsy and Etsy for people listing cover design services. If there is a self-pubbed author whose covers you love, try asking them what artist they use.

-Formatting - you could do this yourself using a formatting program like Atticus, or you could hire someone who does professional e-book formatting.

Here's an article on the turbo-DIY route. Here's a list of formatting programs you can use. To hire someone, you can simply search for book formatting services or look at places where people list such services for hire, like Reedsy, Fiverr, or certain Reddit boards.

-Ad campaigns - you may want to pay for ad campaigns on platforms like Meta or Amazon. More niche, author-specific platforms like BookBub, Book Funnel, or Book Sirens also come with certain costs. 

-Author services - you may wish to hire an expert in things like marketing, blurb copy, social media metrics, newsletter management, etc. You can find information on that here.

Be aware that scam publishers might try to pitch themselves as "author services" - you should be paying someone to help you with specific aspects of your self publishing work, NOT paying to be published.

-Software and platforms - whether it's a subscription to Duotrope, a paid Scribophile account, access to pro Canva features, etc. you may decide to pay for tools that you will use to do your work well.

-Expert advice - some people offer courses, books, or other resources on how to do specific things like write a compelling blurb or run an effective ad campaign. You may notice that a lot of the links I shared here will include upsells from people doing exactly this!

Be very cautious about this, as most of these people claim that they make tons of money on their self published books, but really, they make their money selling this stuff to people like you. Always check out a person’s free resources first, and wait to invest in this sort of thing until you have a specific question you need answered or are trying to do a very particular thing that you need granular guidance on. 

One thing you should NOT pay for is a review, feature, or interview. Self-published authors will be approached by a lot of scammers who claim that, for a nominal fee, they will share information about your book to their huge audiences. These are completely useless and a waste of money. Never spend money on this.

Always keep track of what you are spending on all of this. You may be able to deduct it from taxes you pay on your income from writing, and you will want to really understand what your profit margins look like.

[omnischool]

Formation e-commerce Rabat

Formation professionnelle en ligne e-commerce, Cours de commerce sur Internet, Cours de communication digitale en ligne, Formation e-Commerce en ligne, Formation commerce électronique à distance, Cours E-commerce à distance, Prof E-commerce Rabat, Professeur de e-Commerce Rabat  

Cours SEO SEA SMO e-commerce, Apprendre le e-commerce en ligne

Apprendre le e-commerce à distance, Apprendre le e-commerce sur Internet

Cours e-commerce à domicile Rabat.

Online e-commerce professional training, Internet commerce course, Online digital communication course, Online e-Commerce training, Distance e-commerce training, Distance e-commerce course, Professor E-commerce Rabat,

التدريب المهني للتجارة الإلكترونية عبر الإنترنت ، دورة التجارة الإلكترونية ، دورة الاتصال الرقمي عبر الإنترنت ، التدريب على التجارة الإلكترونية عبر الإنترنت ، التدريب على التجارة الإلكترونية عن بعد

[prosegalaxy]

Once a lowly tinkerer, he found the Scepter of the Winds. A quest unfolded, as unlikely heroes joined his cause. They braved treacherous lands and unraveled ancient secrets. Transformed by love and destiny, they became legends forever entwined in the whispers of time.

[kachmedcom]

Supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS

Supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS

Supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS En tant que formateur, vous avez besoin de supports de formation complets et conformes aux référentiels RNCP et RS. Ces référentiels définissent les compétences et les connaissances que les stagiaires doivent acquérir au cours de la formation. Nos supports de formation répondent à ces exigences. Ils sont conçus par des…

[mostlysignssomeportents]

The Collective Intelligence Institute

History is written by the winners, which is why Luddite is a slur meaning “technophobe” and not a badge of honor meaning, “Person who goes beyond asking what technology does, to asking who it does it for and who it does it to.”

https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/

If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/07/full-stack-luddites/#subsidiarity

Luddites weren’t anti-machine activists, they were pro-worker advocates, who believed that the spoils of automation shouldn’t automatically be allocated to the bosses who skimmed the profits from their labor and spent them on machines that put them out of a job. There is no empirical right answer about who should benefit from automation, only social contestation, which includes all the things that desperate people whose access to food, shelter and comfort are threatened might do, such as smashing looms and torching factories.

The question of who should benefit from automation is always urgent, and it’s also always up for grabs. Automation can deepen and reinforce unfair arrangements, or it can upend them. No one came off a mountain with two stone tablets reading “Thy machines shall condemn labor to the scrapheap of the history while capital amasses more wealth and power.” We get to choose.

Capital’s greatest weapon in this battle is inevitabilism, sometimes called “capitalist realism,” summed up with Frederic Jameson’s famous quote “It’s easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism” (often misattributed to Žižek). A simpler formulation can be found in the doctrine of Margaret Thatcher: “There Is No Alternative,” or even Dante’s “Abandon hope all ye who enter here.”

Hope — alternatives — lies in reviving our structural imagination, thinking through other ways of managing our collective future. Last May, Wired published a brilliant article that did just that, by Divya Siddarth, Danielle Allen and E. Glen Weyl:

https://www.wired.com/story/web3-blockchain-decentralization-governance/

That article, “The Web3 Decentralization Debate Is Focused on the Wrong Question,” set forth a taxonomy of decentralization, exploring ways that power could be distributed, checked, and shared. It went beyond blockchains and hyperspeculative, Ponzi-prone “mechanism design,” prompting me to subtitle my analysis “Not all who decentralize are bros”:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/12/crypto-means-cryptography/#p2p-rides-again

That article was just one installment in a long, ongoing project by the authors. Now, Siddarth has teamed up with Saffron Huang to launch the Collective Intelligence project, “an incubator for new governance models for transformative technology.”

https://cip.org/whitepaper

The Collective Intelligence Project’s research focus is “collective intelligence capabilities: decision-making technologies, processes, and institutions that expand a group’s capacity to construct and cooperate towards shared goals.” That is, asking more than how automation works, but who it should work for.

Collective Intelligence institutions include “markets…nation-state democracy…global governance institutions and transnational corporations, standards-setting organizations and judicial courts, the decision structures of universities, startups, and nonprofits.” All of these institutions let two or more people collaborate, which is to say, it lets us do superhuman things — things that transcend the limitations of the lone individual.

Our institutions are failing us. Confidence in democracy is in decline, and democratic states have failed to coordinate to solve urgent crises, like the climate emergency. Markets are also failing us, “flatten[ing] complex values in favor of over-optimizing for cost, profit, or share price.”

Neither traditional voting systems nor speculative markets are up to the task of steering our emerging, transformative technologies — neither machine learning, nor bioengineering, nor labor automation. Hence the mission of CIP: “Humans created our current CI systems to help achieve collective goals. We can remake them.”

The plan to do this is in two phases:

Value elicitation: “ways to develop scalable processes for surfacing and combining group beliefs, goals, values, and preferences.” Think of tools like Pol.is, which Taiwan uses to identify ideas that have the broadest consensus, not just the most active engagement.

Remake technology institutions: “technology development beyond the existing options of non-profit, VC-funded startup, or academic project.” Practically, that’s developing tools and models for “decentralized governance and metagovernance, internet standards-setting,” and consortia.

The founders pose this as a solution to “The Transformative Technology Trilemma” — that is, the supposed need to trade off between participation, progress and safety.

This trilemma usually yields one of three unsatisfactory outcomes:

Capitalist Acceleration: “Sacrificing safety for progress while maintaining basic participation.” Think of private-sector geoengineering, CRISPR experimentation, or deployment of machine learning tools. AKA “bro shit.”

Authoritarian Technocracy: “Sacrificing participation for progress while maintaining basic safety.” Think of the vulnerable world hypothesis weirdos who advocate for universal, total surveillance to prevent “runaway AI,” or, of course, the Chinese technocratic system.

Shared Stagnation: “Sacrificing progress for participation while maintaining basic safety.” A drive for local control above transnational coordination, unwarranted skepticism of useful technologies (AKA “What the Luddites are unfairly accused of”).

The Institute’s goal is to chart a fourth path, which seeks out the best parts of all three outcomes, while leaving behind their flaws. This includes deliberative democracy tools like sortition and assemblies, backed by transparent machine learning tools that help surface broadly held views from within a community, not just the views held by the loudest participants.

This dovetails into creating new tech development institutions to replace the default, venture-backed startup for “societally-consequential, infrastructural projects,” including public benefit companies, focused research organizations, perpetual purpose trusts, co-ops, etc.

It’s a view I find compelling, personally, enough so that I have joined the organization as a volunteer advisor.

This vision resembles the watershed groups in Ruthanna Emrys’s spectacular “Half-Built Garden,” which was one of the most inspiring novels I read last year (a far better source of stfnal inspo than the technocratic fantasies of the “Golden Age”):

https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/26/aislands/#dead-ringers

And it revives the long-dormant, utterly necessary spirit of the Luddites, which you can learn a lot more about in Brian Merchant’s forthcoming, magesterial “Blood In the Machine: The Origins of the Rebellion Against Big Tech”:

https://www.littlebrown.com/titles/brian-merchant/blood-in-the-machine/9780316487740/

This week (Feb 8–17), I’ll be in Australia, touring my book Chokepoint Capitalism with my co-author, Rebecca Giblin. We’ll be in Brisbane tomorrow (Feb 8), and then we’re doing a remote event for NZ on Feb 9. Next are Melbourne, Sydney and Canberra. I hope to see you!

[Image ID: An old Ace Double paperback. The cover illustration has been replaced with an 18th century illustration depicting a giant Ned Ludd leading an army of Luddites who have just torched a factory. The cover text reads: 'The Luddites. Smashing looms was their tactic, not their goal.']