#filosofía experimental

[itsgerges]

Best regards

All Solar Planets Are Older Than The Sun

or

or

or

The Research Hypothesis

The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- Instead- The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies- And The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- Means- The Sun Rays Are Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total- Shortly- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created After All Planets Creation And Motion Because The Sun Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies. 

That explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body for that the energy out of the sun is so greater than the energy inside the sun (the energy comes from the gravitational waves which are produced by the planets motions energies total)    

The Research Presentation Items

I- Research Methodology 

II- Major Problems In The Physics Book

(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System 

(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition

(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis

(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

III- My 5 Equations 

(1st equation) Planet orbital distance equation-

the equation proves planet orbital distance is defined based on its neighbor orbital distance and no planet mass is used for this definition- Newton is wrong-

(4th equation) Planet diameter equation

The equation proves planet diameter is created based on a geometrical rule (NO Random Creation- the big bang theory is wrong) -also the equation proves the matter is created based on two energies because one energy is Not enough to cause the matter creation

(5th equation) Planet velocity equation

The equation proves planet mass has no effect on this planet velocity definition

IV- The Research Discovery

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field- Moreover- There's No Gravitational Field

V- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis  

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies

VI- Planet Creation And Nature Definition

The Matter Creation has 2 basic features which are (1st feature) the matter is an intersection point between two energies- means- the matter creation depends on two energies where (one energy is not enough to cause the matter creation) AND (2nd feature) the matter is created in pairs and no single matter can be created (as electron and positron are produced from Gamma ray 1.2 Mev) and also (the creation system male and female proves the matter is created in pairs)

These Same Features Are Used For Planet Creation

Planet Is An Intersection Point Between Two Energies- This is similar to two ropes or cables are connected together by one knot (or joint)- the knot is connected with both ropes and each rope motion effect on its motion- this Knot is the planet -This picture makes the planets typical to The Puppets Theater- because their motions depend on the motions of the energies from which the planets are created.

Also- the planets are created in pairs and no single planet can be created– planet velocity definition and its diameter creation both proves this fact

Planet Nature Definition aims to prove (Planet is created based on a coherence of light- means- the matter generally is created based on a coherence of light)- Planet Nature definition is written in details in page No. (10) and its proves are discussed in page No.  (306)

VII-The Solar System Description Refutation-

(The Sun Is The Planets Motions Result But The Description Supposes The Sun Is The Planets Motions Reason) and (The Matter Is Created Depending On Its Motion But The Description Supposes The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Motion)

VIII-The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time

IX -The Physicist Wrong Vision Proves

X -The Refutations Of Many Theories In The Physics Book 

XI -The Proves For My Theory

(There's A Light Beam Moves By Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second)

XII-The Solar System History And Neptune Orbit Creation

XIII-The Proves For Planet Creation And Nature Definition

The Research Hypothesis Explanation

The Sun Rays Creation Process

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim The Sun Rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- also –No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states.  

Here we have four questions to answer

How can the gravitational waves be produced by the planets motions energies?

How can the gravitational waves move by speed of light?

How can the gravitational waves motions produce a light beam?

Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

Let's answer in following

1st Question

How Can The Gravitational Waves Be Produced By The Planets Motions Energies?

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this motion energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- and - fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- and these waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)

Shortly- the planets move and their motions create waves in the space and each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

AND the planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND  in Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity= 205.8 km/s where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

NOW the unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s) is the gravitational wave-

The scientists discovered these waves in the space and they called them (gravitational waves) supposing these waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- BUT Planet motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves – as proved by the previous analysis -means- even if There's NO Gravitational field at all there's a strong reason to find waves in the space because these waves are created by the planets motions energies

Note- I refute the sun gravitational field theory- and prove the sun has no massive gravity and also No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity (Newton Is Wrong)

The Conclusion

The Unified Wave Its Velocity 205.8 Km/S Is The Gravitational Wave

Notice - the new article still believes that the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field- I refuse this idea and prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies but I need the article because it tells the waves can move by speed of light and can produce the light beam where I suppose the sun rays are created by this method 

The Answer Of The Questions No. (2) And No. (3) 

2ndQuestion   How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light? AND

3rdQuestion How Can The Gravitational Waves Motions Produce A Light Beam?

What Do We Have?

We have One unified wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s

What Do We Need?

We need to accelerate the unified wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and this wave should produce (A Light Beam)

We know the light beam is produced from (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light)

Technically- How To Solve This Problem?

We Need To Square The Wave Velocity

Let's see my hypothesis (The Gravitational Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Gravitational Wave Velocity) –

Let's see if this hypothesis can solve the problem

(a)

(205.8)^2 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s = C = (speed of light)

Where

205.8 km/s= the velocity of the unified wave (the gravitational wave)

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect rate for speed (0.99 C)

Let's discuss the equation

The unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s)– and this wave is reflected- the wave reflection causes to square its velocity – for that the velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared and be (205.8 km/s)^2= 42354 km/s

Means the wave before reflection moves by (205.8 km/s) and after reflection the wave moves by (42354 km/s)

But Lorentz length contraction effect rate causes to increase the distance 42354 km to be (42354 x 7.1 = 300000 km)– means- the speed 42354 km/s is accelerated to be 300000 km/s = C=speed of light by Lorentz length contraction effect – we understand the rate 7.1 causes to contract the distances but here the rate increases the distances because the wave reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects.

Conclusion No. (1)

The Wave Reflection Causes To accelerate the unified wave from (205.8 km/s) to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

(b)

Now we have a gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

This wave is reflected one more time

The gravitational wave reflection causes to square its speed by that – the wave speed was = speed of light (C=300000 km/s) before the reflection and after the reflection this speed will be (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)

The light beam is produced from this value (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)

Now we know how the unified wave (205.8 km/s) can be accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and how this wave can produce a light beam

Conclusion No. (2)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity

This is the main useful result from the wave reflection- because without the squaring of the wave velocity no acceleration can be done for the wave and by that the gravitational wave can't move by speed of light Nor produce any light beam

Notice (1)

The waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the abstract provides strong proves for these reflections and more proves are found in the paper- the waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data and I suppose – the waves reflection causes also to square the waves velocity

Notice (2)

The rate 7.1 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect as a result for motion by speed (.99C= 297000 km/s)- I proved this fact in (Item no. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)

THE SUN POINT CREATION

The sun point of space has geometrical features enable to produce the sun rays and that means – the sun rays can be created only in the sun corona and far from the sun NO light beam can be created – let's see the sun geometrical features in following

(i)

The Sun Point Is A Stationary Point Its Velocity 1 km/s = Zero Approximately

This is important feature – Because

All motions are done relative to the sun point of space – for example- Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s –means- Pluto moves by 4.7 km/s relative to the sun point of space – Shortly- the whole solar system is in motion (space and planets are in motion) but the sun point is stationary (static point moves by velocity 1 km/s = Zero approximately) Means- the solar system is similar to a sea of water and the sun is similar to a vortex or whirlpool found on the sea page – the vortex doesn’t move with the sea waves -Shortly- the sun point of space is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-

Example – Venus moves by 35 km/s that means Venus moves by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space – also we know Venus motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity 35 km/s – means- these waves move by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space-

(ii)

Why Is It Necessary For The Sun Point To Be Stationary Point? Because

1- The Gravitational Wave (Unified Wave) Moves By Speed Of Light Relative To The Sun

2- The Gravitational Wave Can NOT Move By Speed Greater Than Speed Of light

3- The Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Different Speed Between The Gravitational Wave Speed And The Sun Point Motion Speed

4- If The Different Speed Is Less Than Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S) The Speed Squaring Process Will Never Produce The Value (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light) – means- No Light Beam Can Be Created

Now we see the necessity to make the sun point as stationary point moves by  (Zero approximately =1 km/s) – because – if the sun point moves by any higher speed than (1 km/s) the different speed will be less than speed of light and the squared value will be less than (C^2) and No light beam can be created

Now let's ask- while the space is in motion as the sea of water – how can this stationary point be created? let's answer in following

(iii)

The planets were created before the sun creation and the planets revolve around a point in space (any point in space) the revolution creates two velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value opposite in direction- the total be Zero- means- the revolution motion creates a stationary point in the revolution center-

By That -the sun point of space is created as a stationary point- and the sun point is the only stationary point in the solar system- for that all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-

4th Question

Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays? the question is logical because

Planet motion energy (1/2 mv^2) is so small energy and the sun rays energy is massive energy -for that- It's Logical Question To Know How Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

Let's answer in following

(1)

The secret is the rates of time using-

The planets motions use different rates of time- by that- the planets motions energies can be accumulated during long period of time to produce massive energy sufficient to produce the sun rays – let's give examples

Example No. (1)

(One Solar Day Of The Sun Clock = 365.25 Solar Days Of The Earth Clock)

By this rate of time– The Earth motion energy for one complete year can be used by the sun in one solar day – in fact- the solar planets motions energies total during one complete year (365.25 solar days) is accumulated and stored in one energy and be used by the sun motion on one solar day that causes to accumulate massive energy to be used (notice 1461 days = 365+365+365+366) 

Example No. (2)

(One Second Of The Sun Clock=1461Seconds Of The Gravitational Wave Clock)

We remember the unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s -And – the gravitational wave moves in 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km -BUT the Sun clock doesn't see this period 1461 seconds but sees only the period (ONE SECOND) – means-

The distance 300000 km is passed in (ONE SECOND)only for the sun clock– That causes the gravitational wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) relative to The Sun – (the rate of time using and effect is explained in details in item no VIII)

Planet Creation And Nature Definition

In this analysis I suppose- Planet is created based on a coherence of light- here- I define planet creation as example for the matter creation generally- and- I prove planet is created by coherence of light- means- the matter is created by coherence of light. 

I want to say -

The main idea tells- Planet is created based on two energies interaction (or two light beams coherence)– one source of energy can NOT create any matter (Nor Any Planet)

Planet Nature Analysis

Let's Discuss Planet Nature Features in following

(1ST FEATURE)

Planet Is An Intersection Point Between Two Energies- Imagine we have one energy moves in (x-axis direction) and have also another energy moves in (y-axis direction)- the two energies meet each other in One Point which is (an intersection point) – this point is A Planet

This is similar to two ropes or cables or strings are connected together by one knot (or joint)- the knot is connected with both ropes and each rope motion effect on this knot motion direction-

This explanation is typical to The Puppets Theater-the puppets are connected with strings and these strings define these puppets motions direction-shortly- Planet motion depends on the motions of the energies by which this planet is created-simply Planet is an intersection point between two energies and these energies motions effect on this planet motion Direction 

Notice- The data doesn't show any effect of planet mass on its motion. 

Shortly– Theprevious explanation tells Planet is created based on two energies- one energy is NOT enough to create a planet (the matter) 

(2ND FEATURE)

The Matter Is Created In Pairs And No Single Matter Can Be Created -AND

Planet Creation And Motion Are Defined By Another Planet Motion

As in the experiment- (Gamma ray 1.2 Mev can produce electron and positron)- that proves the matter is created in pairs and no single matter can be created- also the creation system (male and female) supports this same fact- I want to say- all matters are created similar to the electron and positron from Gamma ray- simply- the matter is created in pairs- for that- Planets also are created in pairs and no single planet can be created- Planet velocity and diameters analysis prove this fact clearly- the proves discussion are found in page no. (**)  

This feature also proves the matter is created based on two energies- also in the Gamma ray experiment because we need two energies– the first energy is Gamma ray 1.2 Mev from which electron and positron can be produced– the second energy is the used energy to produce electron and positron from Gamma ray- means-the method by which Gamma ray 1.2 Mev can produce electron and positron- please note the principle idea tells (the matter is created in pairs and no single matter can be created-AND- the matter creation needs two energies because one energy is not enough to create the matter) 

Please note- Feature no.(1) tells, planet is an intersection point (a knot) between two energies- but Feature no. (2) tells matter is created in pairs and no single matter can be created– that means- these intersection points (knots) are created in pairs and can't be created individually-BUT Why?? because the matter creation depends on the energy reflection- the reflection causes to create the matter is pairs- this fact is explained in feature No. (5) 

(3RD FEATURE)

Planet Diameter Is Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period

This fact is proved by my planet diameter equation

Please note-my planet diameter equation proves Planet diameter is created based on two motions because the equation uses two planets velocities (v1/v2) that proves two motions are required to produce planet diameter which supports our principle tells (Planet matter is created depending on two energies because one energy is not enough to produce the matter)

(4TH FEATURE)

I have two examples explain the matter nature

(1st Example) the matter is similar to creature muscles- shortly- even if the muscle is very strong as a rock- we understand this muscle is found depending on the blood motion-and any change in the blood motion can effect on the muscle dimensions and ability- similar to that the matter is created depending on the motion of the energies Based on which this matter is created-

(2nd Example)–If the space is similar to the sea of water- the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page- we understand the whirlpool (vortex) is created by the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- that explains how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters- why does this diameter equal= 2 meters? The diameter is created depending on the water velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also-

Notice we understand the whirlpool (vortex) is found because at least two streams of water meet each other- means- one stream is not enough to create a whirlpool (vortex)– similar to that- one energy is not enough to cause the matter creation but two energies are required to cause the matter creation- because the matter is an intersection point between these two energies- 

(5TH FEATURE)

Why should The Matter be Created In Pairs And No Single Matter Can Be Created? Let's answer -The matter creation needs two energies because the matter is an intersection point between these two energies- means- the matter creation (and planet creation) needs two energies-

In the solar system one of these two energies is A Reflected Energy-

let's explain that

The solar planets matters and their distances are created from one energy and this one energy is provided by one light beam moves by speed = 1.16 million km per second- The light built the solar system starting its motion from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation- means- all orbits are created before any planet creation- the orbits are created based on each other (as proved by my planet orbital distance equation) after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second in Mercury orbit before the space creation- and its speed be 300000 km/s in Pluto orbit after the space creation as result for the energy consumption in the space creation- 

In Pluto orbit- The light had no energy to build any more orbits -for that- the light returned to its origin point (Mercury orbit) for that the light is reflected with speed (C=300000 km/s) from Pluto orbit to Mercury orbit passing through all built orbits– no energy is required in this motion for that the light beam moves with speed of light (C=300000 km/s) in Mercury orbit.

This explanation tells us- there are 2 energies in each orbit which are the (1st energy) is the orbit energy by which the orbit is created (depends on the original speed 1.16 million km per second)- and the (2nd energy) is the reflected energy (moves by the known speed of light 300000 km/s)

The Solar System Coherence Of Light

Here I claim planet creation is done by the coherence of light-

The previous explanation shows the reflected energy (the light beam moves by the known speed of light C=300000 km/s) is reflected from Pluto to Mercury and passed through all orbits while each orbit is built by energy and this energy is provided by the original light beam speed (1.16 million km per second)- means- the orbit energy is the energy of the original light beam its speed (1.16 million km per second) and the reflected energy is the energy moves by the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- shortly- The coherence of light is done between these two light beams- one of them moves by the original light beam speed (1.16 million km per second) and the other moves by the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- the coherence of light is done between these two light beams  

The planets are created based on this coherence of light – I have Three Proves for this fact –let's see them in following

(First Proof)

The planets velocities are defined based on the speed (1.16 million km per second)- this is proved by the rule (v1v2=322) as explained - let's remember this explanation

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities)    x 6.8 km/s  (Uranus velocities)               

322 = 35 km/s  (Venus velocity)            x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                     

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity)     x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2  

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)            x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)                        

Venus (35 km/s) moves a distance  1.16 million km in 4.7 x 2 hours and

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves a distance 1.16 million km in 35 x 2 hours -And

Earth (29.8 km/s) moves a distance  1.16 million km in 5.4 x 2 hours and

Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves a distance 1.16 million km in 29.8 x 2 hours

Shortly the planets velocities are defined complementary one another based on The Original Light Beam Speed 1.16 million km per second-

Means the planets velocities are defined as function in this original speed 1.16 million km per second- as proved by the data- this data analysis proves the effect of the original speed of light (1.16million km per second) on the planets velocities definition 

(Second Proof)

The planets velocities total is defined based on the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s) –let's remember this fact in following

(205.8)^2 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s = C = (Speed Of Light)

Where

205.8 km/s= 9 the planets velocities total + the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s)

(the moon and the Earth revolve together for that their velocities are considered equal)

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect rate for speed (0.99 C)

Let's discuss the equation

The planets motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move by their planets velocities and these waves move toward Pluto orbit and in Pluto Orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave moves by the planets velocities total – means- This unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s)–and then this unified wave is reflected- the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity– for that the velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared and be (205.8 km/s)^2= 42354 km/s – means- the wave velocity was (205.8 km/s) before its reflection and after the reflection the wave velocity be (42354 km/s) -

-BUT- Lorentz length contraction effect rate causes to increase the distance 42354 km to be (42354 x 7.1 = 300000 km) – means- the speed 42354 km/s is accelerated to be 300000 km/s = C=speed of light by Lorentz length contraction effect – we understand the rate 7.1 causes to contract the distances but here the rate increases the distances because the wave reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects

This data shows- the planets velocities total is LIMIT to the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s) because the energy reflection effects are obligatory- means- the planets velocities can NOT be greater than (205.8 km/s) because that would cause the final speed to  be greater than speed of light (C=300000km/s) which is impossible and that tells the planets velocities are defined by The Limit which is (the known speed of light C=300000 km/s)

The two proves show the planets velocities are defined based on two limits – the original speed (1.16 million km per second) based on which the planets velocities are defined and the known speed of light (C=300000km/s) which is The Limit for the planets velocities total– this analysis proves my theory tells (The Planets Are Created Depending On The Coherence Of Light Is Done Between The Original Light Beam Its Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second And The Reflected Energy Which Moves By The Known Speed Of Light (C=300000 km/s))

(Third Proof)

Young coherence of light produces the interference (bright fringes and dark fringes)- let's suppose– we see bright fringes as planets- and if the fringe breadth is comparable with planet diameter- we will find that- the solar planets distribution is typical to the interference of Young- because- the greatest diameter planet "Jupiter" is found in the middle and the other planets diameters are decreased gradually on both sides typical to the fringes distribution in Young interference- please note- I have proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated to its current orbit by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury-Mars- Venus- The Earth) the diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury typical to Young Interference (Also the outer planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Pluto)  

The Matter Is Created In Pairs

Now we know each orbit has two energies- (1st energy) the orbit energy by which the orbit is created (2nd energy) the reflected energy which is passed through all orbits- by that- NOW one energy is a reflected energy and the reflection caused the matter to be created in pairs- why??

The energy reflection causes to create complementary values- imagine a light beam is reflected on some mirror- here–we have the original light beam and the reflected light beam- the two light beams are similar in all data but in opposite directions- that tells the energy reflection causes to create the data reflected on each other (and complementary one another)- and the complementary data cause to create the matters in pairs and no single matter can be created-

Shortly -because the energy is reflected in the solar system the matter is created in pairs by the energy reflection effect where No single matter can be created     

(6TH FEATURE)

How can planet matter be created by two energies? By what method this creation can be done? There are three methods can be used

(First Method) Can Planet Be Created As A Wave?

We know the particle has double nature and behaves as a wave-

Let's suppose planet is created as a wave? How can the wave be created?

We need two motions perpendicular on each other- means- we need two energies perpendicular on each other- means- by two energies motions a wave can be created and this wave will be a planet - Just we need to suppose that the two energies in each orbit are perpendicular on each other and that will cause to create the planet as a wave 

(Second Method) The Energy Reflection

As explained the energy reflection causes to create the values in pairs (reflected on each other and complementary one another) because the original values produce reflected values and that cause the values to be created in pairs-and that cause the matter to be created in pairs- shortly- the energy reflection is the reason to create the matter in pairs- that causes planets data to be created in pairs complementary one another- (as proved by planet velocity definition by the rule v1v2=constant= 322) 

Also planet diameter follows this same rule (R1R2=Constant)- because the planets are created in pairs and the matter generally is created in pairs (as electron and positron from Gamma ray 1.2 Mev)

Shortly- The Creation In Pairs Is Done Basically Because Of The Energy Reflection 

(Third Method) The Coherence Of Light

As explained before Young coherence of light produces the interference which can be comparable with the solar system because the bright fringes distribution is typical to the solar planets distribution if we suppose the fringe breadth is comparable with planet diameter

Notice - we understand, the matter is created in pairs because of the energy reflection and if the planets are created by the coherence of light that tells the coherence of light must contain reflection of energy which is a fact- because- the coherence of light contains reflection of energy and this reflection is seen in the fringes distribution because the fringes breath is decreased gradually on both sides means each side is reflected on the other and that shows there's a reflection of energy found in the coherence of light-  

NOTICE The Proves Discussion for Planet Nature Definition is found in pages (306)

First Item - Research Methodology

I use the planets data analysis to discover the planets creation and motion facts–

In details- I try to discover how the planet get its data- for example – why Jupiter diameter is 142984 km? why Neptune axel tilt is 28.3 deg? why Pluto orbital period is 90560 days? This method helps greatly to discover the solar system facts let's provide two examples to explain how this method works

Example No. (1)

Why Is The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 Km?

The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 days (the moon day period) the displacements total be = 2.598 million km = 2π x 413600 km

The data tells us the moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km and also it tells, because the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is so long, the moon should revolve around the Earth through this apogee orbit its radius (413600 km) only and can't revolve around the Earth through any more near orbit…

Not Facts

The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km only and the moon revolves around the Earth through near orbits and can reach to perigee radius (363000 km). 

How Can The Moon Do That?

 

The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level by that the real displacement (L) through the orbit be less than (88000 km) because it be (L = 88000 km cos θ), as a result the total displacements be less than (2.598 million km) and that makes the moon orbital apogee radius to be decreased from 413600 km to 406000 km.

We should pay attention for the angle (θ), because this angle controls the moon motion features – where- with the angle (θ) increasing the real displacement (L) be shorter and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits – but –with the angle (θ) deceasing the real displacement (L) be longer and that pushes the moon far from the Earth to more far orbits- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this angle (θ) it tells θ1 = θ0 +1.7 deg where (θ1) = today angle and (θ0) =yesterday angle and 1.7 deg is used as the moon motion degrees per solar day for the equation

Example No. (2)

Can Mars Itself Cause The Earth Moon Creation?

Giant-impact hypothesis tells (NO) – but let's see the planets data analysis   

I Suppose - Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus

The order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows correct order in planets diameters (and masses), and orbital distances - BUT – Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) to its current one (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with the Earth in its migration motion – and Mars itself has caused the Earth moon creation- My Mars Migration Theory answers many left questions by Giant-Impact Hypothesis – for example -

Why Does Venus Have No Moon? Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) – and moved to its current orbit (227.9 million km) – BUT- Mars had moved by a force – and then Mars had collided with Venus –and Mars had pushed ALL DEBRIS with it in its Motion Direction because of its strong motion - Venus had found no debris around and for that Venus couldn't create its moon –But – The Earth mass is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum for that the Earth could attracted some debris and created its moon-Mars has 2 moons and this fact supports my theory because Mars with small mass could attract two  moons because the debris were around it while Venus has greater mass but couldn't create its own moon because the debris are moved with Mars motion- the rest debris are attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt 

Shortly

The planet data analysis compares between the theory and the planets data to see if there's harmony between them and if the data logical analysis supports the theory 

Second Item - Major Problems In The Physics Book

(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System 

(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition

(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis

(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition 

1stProblem The Physicist wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System 

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the matter (mass) as a wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and the physicist searches for this (unit of building)–

For that the physicist divided the matter and found the particles and then the particle is divided into Molecules and the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- for that he divides anything to reach to this building unit- 

The Nature System Vision

The Nature designer aims to create INTEGRATION- as the marriage– male and female- For that- the matter is created complementary one another-means- The Matter Is Created In Pairs (as Gamma ray 1.2 Mev produces electron and positron)

No building unit- AND

I want to show how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method while the physicist divides the elements (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which the physicist considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process- Shortly- the physicist sees a universe (never be created by the designer)- while the designer created the integration is a goal and created tools to perform this integration the physicist destroyed the integration tools while he searched for the building unit which is not found at all.

NOTICE

Another point shows the physicist wrong vision is (The Planet Motion)

While the solar planets move as gears in one machine and all planets motions are unified into one unified general motion- means- all planets motions are unified and produce one result only (one unified motion)- the physicist supposes each planet motion is independent-by that- in place of one machine of gears moves and produces one unified motion (one result) the physicist told us each planet motion is independent and No unification is found for the planets motions –here – one more time the physicist sees very different picture from the real one- in place of one hand has five fingers the physicist sees five independent moving fingers

2ndProblem  Planet Motion Energy Definition

Let's remember this question where's Planet Motion Energy?

We agreed planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy must be stored in the space as moving waves because planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body otherwise this planet temperature would be raised- that tells- the space has moving waves produced by planet motion energy

Also –we agreed- planet motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity-

Shortly- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and its motion energy produces waves in the space and these waves move by velocity (47.4 km/s) –this analysis creates 3 difficulties for the physics book let's see them

First Difficulty

This analysis tells the space has moving waves are produced by planets motions energies– But- the scientists discovered these waves and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field- and they called them (gravitational waves)- I prove the sun doesn’t produce a gravitational field and has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity – But- here we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?) because planet motion energy analysis forces us to accept that these waves are produced by the planets motions energies

Here – we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?)

I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field.

I provided two major proves

(1st proof) I proves there's no gravitational field and the sun has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity

(2nd proof) the gravitational waves reflection proves the waves are produced by the planets motions energies because the waves reflection causes effects on the planets data

Second Difficulty

Now we know planet motion energy is stored in the space as moving waves (the gravitational waves)- But- the planets move since long period of time means the planets motions should cause to store massive motion energy in space during this long period- Now -where's this stored massive energy? also the energy can NOT be stored in space forever- so what's happening for this stored massive energy? I prove the sun rays are created from this stored massive energy and not from the sun nuclear fusion process- this is my research hypothesis – in all cases we should know how this stored massive energy be used because this massive energy can cause risk for the solar system stability.

Third Difficulty

Newton Mass gravity definition is disproved by planet motion energy

Because

Suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity and the moon motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) now let's ask- From What Source The Moon Motion Energy Is Provided? What's the moon motion reason? The mass gravity- means- the mass should provide the motion energy- means – if The moon moves by the Earth gravity that necessitates to decrease the masses of the Earth and the moon by the motion energy- here's the problem- Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass-  this decrease is done because of the motion energy

The analysis tells us–the physicist supposes planet motion produces NO energy this is the only one solution for the problems created by the physicist neglect to observe planet motion energy-

3rdProblem Mass Gravity Force Analysis

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- 

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- Planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- planet creation and motion is done by one force only- otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it-

Suppose planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force this planet to move against its internal structure and that will cause this planet to be broken-

Imagine a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs- this human will be dead by this motion-

That's why the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created- and he considered - the creation force is a historical force has no effect on the current motion- Shortly-the sun didn't cause to create any planet and the sun doesn't cause any planet to move

(iii)

We agreed that, mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- because –any motion will produce energy- suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity- the moon motion produces energy- and – from what source this energy is provided? From the masses of the Earth and the moon –here's the problem  

Where Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass

BUT Mass gravity is a fact - the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon are bond by their masses gravity ) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon.

(iv)

The planets order contradicts the gravitation equation- for example- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the planets initial conditions)- all these are wrong- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on this planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do)

where d=planet orbital distance

do= its neighbor orbital distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                             

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance       d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance     d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct and discussed in item no. (III)- Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor planets orbits (item No. III has more proves)

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is wrong - I define planet velocity (my 5th equation)- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The Conclusion

The Sun Doesn't Produce Any Gravitational Field

4th Problem The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

In following we compare between the physics book theory about the matter creation and my theory about it- the discussion contains Two points

I- The Physics Book Theory About The Creation of the Matter (Mass)

The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Outer Motion – means- even if the matter motion is stopped the matter is still found and never be perished (the motion here means the outer motion and not the atoms motions)

The Matter Is Motionless By Nature

The Matter Needs Mass Gravity Force To Cause Its Motion

The Matter Data And Dimensions Are Not Changed By Its Motion

The big bang theory tells planet is created by random creation- for example- Jupiter diameter is created by unknown value and Jupiter is collided many times in its history and these collisions caused Jupiter diameter (and mass) to be decreased- based on that– Jupiter diameter value (142984 km) is found by random process and without any geometrical reason behind- by that- the big bang theory prevent us to use any planet data to discover the creation and motion rules of this planet.

Note – The physicist doesn't use planet data in forming a theory to explain this planet motion-for example- Jupiter diameter is 142984 km and the physicist has a theory explains Jupiter motion but if Jupiter diameter is changed into 180000 km the theory will have no change because the physicist doesn't consider Jupiter diameter is a player in its motion- that's why the big bang theory is wrong because it supposes the change in diameter and mass doesn't cause a change in motion 

Shortly- the physics book doesn't tell how the matter is created nor what's the matter nature- we remember Einstein problem in physics- he told (All researches in particle electromagnetic properties can't predict this particle behavior in the daily life physics) that shows two different branches of the physics one for the electromagnetism and the other for the mass gravity physics

II- My Theory About The Creation of the matter (mass) –

The Matter Main Features Are: 

The Matter Is Created In Pairs  Means- No Single Matter Is Created -This conclusion depends on Gamma ray experiment -From Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) electron and positron are created- by this experiment- the matter is created in pairs from electromagnetic waves- the produced pair particles motions depend on each other (or related to each other) (notice the creation system is male and female–two complementary matters-that tells the source of energy must be electromagnetic wave)

The matter is created depending on its motion- means- the motion is found before the matter creation- this conclusion depends on my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity (for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)- means–Planet motion is defined before its creation -later explained

Lorentz transformation proves Matter dimensions are effected by high speed motion- also- Lorentz transformation proves the matter and space are created from the same energy for that particle length and distance both are contracted by the same one equation (Lorentz length contraction effect)

The Matter Is Created Depending On Light Motion –

The Discussion Proves These Features Strongly

The Matter Creation Depends On 5 Main Facts  Which Are

Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron

Lorentz Transformation

My Planet Diameter Equation

The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference) 

Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit

(Item No. i) Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron    From Gamma ray (1.2Mev) one electron and one positron are created- I prove the matter is created by this method- means- the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created

(Item No. ii) Lorentz Transformation

Lorentz transformation tells

If a particle moves by high speed motion (near to speed of light), this particle length would be contracted and its mass would be increased and its time would be dilated

I accept this meaning clearly and find this meaning supports my theory strongly BUT Many physics Books tell the following

(NO Real Change Is Done For Any Particle Data Moves By High Speed Motion But All Changes Are Illusions Of Measurements)-

Means- while a particle is moving by high speed motion and the experiments results show contraction in its length and increasing in its mass and dilation in its time – these changes are just illusions in measurements and the particle itself has no change in any data - tenth of books tell this meaning clearly and with confirmation and the physicist killed Lorentz work and made Lorentz transformation measures illusions and not facts- regardless the empirical proves which supports Lorentz transformation  

I refuse these books idea because

The Physics Is The Measurements Science And What's Measured Is The Fact

If no real changes are done how the problem of Michelson and Morelly experiment is solved?- also- Why the synchronous events in one frame can't be synchronous in another (as Einstein stated) where no change is found for any data- the distances are Not contracted nor the time is dilated nor the mass is increased why the events can NOT be synchronous in any frame?  

If the particle own data is measured correctly while it moves by my motion velocity and these measurements are suffered from illusions because the particle moves by high speed motion relative to my motion that means (I'm the universe reference point)

We notice- Lorentz length contraction equation can't distinguish between particle length and a distance, both can be contracted by the same one equation- that supports my theory tells (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same Energy)–

My planet diameter equation proves planet diameter is created depending on this planet motion and also proves the matter and space are created from the same one energy which supports Lorentz transformation 

NOTICE  

The major importance of Lorentz transformation is

The transformation proves there's a connection between particle dimensions and its  motion means the motion has effect on particle dimensions definition and by that the matter (mass) can't be independent because its existence depends on a motion- shortly (The Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion) 

The matter and space are created from the same energy- because- particle length and the distance both are contracted by the same equation (Lorentz length contraction effect) shortly (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same One Energy) (This theory is proved by my planet diameter equation)

(Item No. iii) My Planet Diameter Equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity                          

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination   

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity                        

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity      

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example  Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8                  

89143                   = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km   = Neptune diameter            

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity             

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

Discussion

(1)

The Equation Concept  Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbit (orbital distance) its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result- the designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if  the Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved

(2)

Matter Definition Based On My Planet Diameter Equation

My equation tells, Planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because it velocity is 5.4 km/s where the velocity is used in the diameter definition equation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- how can that be possible? let's answer in following

The original energy was in motion and planet matter is created from this moving original energy and planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after Planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data and dimensions are created that's why Planet data is in full harmony with its motion features- that explains how planet diameter is created based on its velocity

Shortly- the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle dimensions depend on the blood motion- similar to that- the matter dimensions depend on this energy motion from which this matter is created-

Also space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a distinguished picture different from the space picture and the matter moves by a different velocity from the space motion velocity- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- that explains how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters- why does this diameter equal= 2 meters? The diameter is created depends on the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also- (notice- The Gravitational Waves Prove The Space Has Motion And Not Static)

NOTICE   Also (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) Newton is wrong, because planet moves by the energy from which this planet is created- as explained here – means– The Matter Is Not Motionless By Nature- The Matter moves with the energy from which this matter is created-

(3)

Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion

Shortly-if the motion is stopped the matter will be perished- again the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature body- if the blood motion is stopped the muscle will be perished- this is the fact- Based on that- Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s if Neptune stops its motion Neptune diameter and matter will be perished-

The fact I prove is (The Matter Creation Depends On Its Motion) – Lorentz transformation and my planet diameter equation supports this fact strongly 

DEEP DISCUSSION

(4)

The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created

Planet velocity is defined based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) let's prove that

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities)         x 6.8 km/s  (Uranus velocities)                            

322 = 35 km/s  (Venus velocity)                 x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                     

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity)                    x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2  

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)                x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)                        

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity)                   (Max error 2%)

The idea is understandable – let's summarize it in following

(i)

The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) and

(ii)

Planet data is created depending on its velocity- means- planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation and based on the velocity all other data is created- as we see in the planet diameter equation, planet diameter and all creation data is created depending on this planet velocity- means- based on (v1/v2) but planet orbital distance is defined based on  (v1/v2)^2 and planet orbital period is defined based on (v1/v2)^3

Based on this system planet data is created but we know that planet orbital distance is defined before planet creation and based on the orbit, planet velocity is defined and then all data is defined based on the planet velocity-

(iii)

Now the idea is clear- let's summarize it

The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=322) and planet diameter is created depending on its velocity for that reason planet diameter is created complementary to another planet diameter- let's prove that

341.7 million km = Jupiter diameter 142984 km          x Pluto diameter 2390 km

341.7 million km = Jupiter radius 71492 km       x Mercury diameter 4879 km (2%)

341.7 million km  = Saturn diameter 120536 km x 4 Mars diameter 6792 km (4%)

341.7 million km = Uranus diameter 51118 km  x Earth radius 6378 km (5%)

341.7 million km = Neptune diameter 49528 km x 2 The Moon diameter 3475 km

Clearly we see the planets diameters are complementary one another- because the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created

Notice (1)

Suppose the physicist can create a type of single matter which has no complementary can that disprove my theory tells (The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created?) NO NEVER

Because- the matter is created from the original energy and the energy uses a system depends on matters in pairs complementary one another-  means any type of matter can't be used by the original energy will be neglected and useless because the energy uses matters in pairs  

(Item No. v) The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference)

I provide proves tell Gamma Ray and Young experiments are used in the solar planets creation – let's remember these experiments

(1st Experiment) Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) can produce electron and positron

(2nd Experiment) the coherence of light experiment (Young Interference)

Let's provide the proves for the using of these two experiments in the planets creation

Gamma Ray Experiment

There are two facts prove this experiment concept is used in the planets creation

First Fact Planet creation data is defined based on its velocity- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity as explained before (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)-means- Planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation process and based on this velocity all planet creation and motion data is created

Second Fact Planet velocity is complementary one another, which is proved by the rule (v1v2= 322 = constant)- that shows the planets data must be complementary one another as I have proved in the diameters values analysis

Shortly – The planets data are complementary one another (similar to the electron and positron are created from Gamma ray)

The Coherence of light Experiment (Young Interference)

There are two facts prove this experiment concept using in the solar system creation

1st Fact

The planets order is typical for Young interference- if we consider planet diameter is equivalent to the fringe breadth by that the planets order be typical for Young interference where the greatest fringe is in the middle (the greatest planet Jupiter) and the fringes breadth is deceased gradually on both sides

(I Proved Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus- so the original inner planets order was Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) which shows gradual decreasing in diameters- the outer planets diameters also is decreased gradually      

2nd Fact

There's a coherence of light in the solar system- what does that mean?

Means- while planet orbit has energy of a light beam- another light beam enters this orbit by that there are two light beams in the same orbit- these two light beams create coherence of light- the planets orbits creation explain this fact in details- but here I want to prove this fact by simple direct proof before the planets orbits creation discussion –let's write this proof here

We have seen that the planets velocities are complementary one another by the rule (v1v2=constant=322) and planet all data is created depending on its velocity- by that the planets diameters also follow this rule where (R1R2= constant) as I have proved in my planet diameter equation

Now let's ask – can the planets orbits complementary one another? NO

So- how this rule (v1v2=constant= 322) is found?

By the energy reflection- means- the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection of energy causes the velocities to be reflected on one another and that produced the rule (v1v2=constant= 322)

We note the planets can’t be reflected on each other because the planets are connected with their orbits- and the energy reflection needs freedom in motion- means- this reflection of the planets velocities are done by effect of the energy reflection- please note- the energy reflection is a proved fact in the solar system- this fact is proved by hundreds of the planets data because the energy reflection cause effects on the planets data- shortly- the planets data is created by effects of the energy reflection-

Here we see the coherence of light is created because the orbits have energy where the space is energy and (Another energy is reflected and moved through all orbits and caused to create the planets data) by that each orbit has two energies together- I prove both energies are light beams-for that the two light beams create a coherence of light

I want to say- there are two facts prove the solar system has coherence of light which are the reflection of energy and the planets order

The planets orbits creation explain this theory in details I discuss it in item no. (**)

NOTICE

Please Note – I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars is migrated to its current orbit behind the Earth- by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) here we see planets diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury where Jupiter was the planet beside the Earth- means – the planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Mercury- and the outer planets – the planets diameters also are decreased gradually- as I explained – if we compare planet diameter with fringe- the planets order be typical to Young interference – but – the order is reflected each other –let's see that

The inner planets (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates longer orbital distance – but

The outer planets (Jupiter– Saturn– Uranus– Neptune –Pluto)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates shorter distance

Here we see the orders are reflected one another- but in Young interference there's no reflection- I want to say- the planets orders are reflected because of the sun position- if the sun is not found no reflection will be found- that means- the reflection of energy caused to create the sun in the solar system because the sun creation causes the planets order to be reflected one another- my paper proves the sun is created after all planets creation and motion – and the sun is created by the reflected energy 

(Item No. vi) Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit

The solar planets matters and their distances are created from one energy and this one energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed = 1.16 million km per second (The speed is proved strongly and decisively)

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) built the solar system orbits starting from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation- means- all orbits are created before any planet creation- the orbits are created based on each other (this fact is proved by my planet orbital distance equation) after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second before the space creation (In Mercury Orbit) and its speed becomes 300000 km/s after the space creation (in Pluto orbit) as result for the energy consumption in the space creation- 

In Pluto orbit - the light could Not move any further to build any more orbits because any additional space creation will consume more energy and that will decrease the light speed to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) – and – No known light moves by speed less than 300000 km/s – means- the light had no energy to move any further after Pluto orbit- for that- the light returns to its origin point (Mercury orbit) for that the light is reflected with speed (300000 km/s) from Pluto orbit to Mercury orbit passing through the built orbits– no energy is required in this motion for that the light beam moves with speed of light (300000 km/s) till Mercury orbit.

Please note- the light (300000 km/s) is reflected from Pluto to Mercury

The reflection of the light beam (300000 km/s) Caused To Create The Solar Planets

Comments

The light (1.16 million km per second) created the orbits with energy means the created orbits have energies- and each planet orbit energy is less than its previous neighbor orbit because the planets velocities are decreased gradually- almost the energy is less by rate 80% because the velocities are rated with (0.8)   

Each planet diameter is created based on its orbit energy- the planet is similar to a tree planted in a ground and the planet orbit is this ground- that's why each planet diameter depends on this planet velocity and orbital inclination- please note Mars diameter equation proves this fact because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars diameter is created based on this orbit energy and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one behind the Earth but Mars diameter equation still shows Mars original orbital inclination (5.1degrees) while Mars current orbital inclination is 1.9 degrees- Mars diameter is created based on this inclination (5.1 deg) for that this inclination is seen in Mars diameter equation frequently (please review my planet diameter equation)    

The Occurrence Of The Coherence Of Light - The light beam (300000 km/s) is reflected and passed through all created orbits- that shows there two light beams are found in the same area (in any orbit)- because in each orbit there's this orbit energy which is found with the orbit creation by the light (1.16 million km per second) for that we say (Space Is Energy) because any orbit has energy found with its creation- and also the reflected light beam (300000 km/s) passed through all orbits- by that- in any orbit there are two different light beams (two different energies) and these light beams create A Coherence together- 

The Amazing Coherence Of Light There's a major interesting point here-the light beam (300000 km/s) created a coherence with the light 1.16 million km per second! BUT HOW?? because the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed and its energy is used for the space creation and the rest energy is this light beam moves by known speed of light (300000 km/s)!! how can the light beam (300000 km/s) meet the original light beam the 1.16 million km per second to create this coherence of light?

Please note- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the major used speed in the solar system data- means- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the secret by which the solar system data can be understood because all data is created as function in this speed-I prove that in the next pages- but this information is written to explain that the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed but its energy still works and causes continuous effect- BUT HOW??   

Let's write the answer

The light (300000 km/s) is reflected to move from Pluto to Mercury (while the original light 1.16 million km per second moved from Mercury to Pluto) means the light (300000 km/s) moved in opposite direction for the motion of the original light 1.16 million km per second- MEANS- the light (300000km/s) moved in the opposite direction of space to reach to Mercury- BUT NOT ONLY- in fact- the light (300000 km/s) moved also in the opposite direction OF TIME and moved into its own past – and in past – this light beam (300000 km/s) met the original light beam 1.16 million km per second – and in past – the two light beams created the coherence of light and then this coherence of light results have effects on our present time-

Shortly- the coherence of light in the solar system proves the light beam (300000 km/s) moved on the time-axis and this is an empirical proof for the time-axis motion where the light can move simply on the time axis

Notice – this motion can help us to create the time machine- because- if the light can move into the past that means we may use this motion and take photos of the past events and this will be our time machine which can go into the past and make photos and videos for the past events – even the events since thousands of years we can see in videos or in photos – this motion of light can give us a great option to create our machine of time      

Notice  the original light beam 1.16 million km per second can not move into the future to meet the light beam (300000 km/s) because in future the original light 1.16 million km per second is NOT found because its energy is consumed in the space creation- but- the light beam (300000km/s) can move into the past because in the past the light beam (300000 km/s) was part in the original light beam 1.16 million km per second and by that the two light beams be found in the same time   

Notice – we can not travel ourselves into the past- because planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- as proved by my planet diameter equation- means- the matter is created depending on its motion velocity- and the velocity is a motion in defined direction- the light is free in motion and doesn't forced to move in any direction for that the light has this option to move on the time axis but the matter is created depending on a motion in defined direction (no freedom in motion) for that the matter can't move on the time axis because the motion force the matter to move in a defined direction – the matter moved just to the future– and the matter can't move into the past-  

Planet Creation Machine Please note–we see the coherence of light is done by the two light beams 300000 km/s and 1.16 million km per second (because the light beam 300000 km/s can reach to the light 1.16 million km per second by moving into its past)- shortly – here we have 2 light beams in any orbit- and these two light beams cause two motions – we can imagine these two motions are perpendicular on each other – this perpendicular motions create a wave and planet is created as a wave (Particle is a wave also)- that explains how the planets are created 

Please note-  The reflection of energy is very effective in the solar planets data because the reflection of energy caused the planets to be created- the matter can't be created by the energy of any orbit alone but the reflection of energy adds second energy inside each orbit- by that- two energies are found in any orbit (two light beams) by these two light beams the light coherence is created and also the planets are created as waves-that explains why the planets data prove the reflection of energy because the planets are created by this energy reflection- as when we plant a tree we need a ground and we need seeds to be put in this ground- two players- the planets are created by two energies (two light beams coherence) and for that the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds (300000 km/s) and (1.16 million km per second) as planet velocity definition proves.

Please note  the Matter Is Created In Pairs (as electron and positron from Gamma rays 1.2 Mev) – this is the main system of creation but -In planets creation the rule is used with some complex method- the complementary is found for the planets velocities and the planets data is created depending on these velocities- the same concept but the method is more complex- this similar to the creature creation- the cell reproduction is done by split the cell into two new cells- but in higher creatures the reproduction use more complex methods but the cell method is still the base of these complex methods  

Please note  the previous analysis tries to conclude how the planet matter is created – I put all available facts to reach to this conclusion- the matter real mechanism may be still not clear but many provided facts help to reach to this mechanism- also- we know the main concept behind the matter creation which is (The Matter Is Created In Pairs And Not Single Matter Is Created)

This Concept Is Proved Strongly And Clearly By The Gamma Rays Experiment And The Planets Data

 (Item No. vii) The Proves Of The Light Speed 1.16 million km per second

THE SPEED PROVES

In following I prove the speed 1.16 million km per second is found

The paper provides many powerful proves – but - here I refer to 4 proves only

(1st Proof)

Planet Velocity Analysis proves the speed 1.16 million km per second

Data

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities)  x 6.8 km/s  (Uranus velocities)                         

322 = 35 km/s  (Venus velocity)       x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                     

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity)          x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2  

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)       x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)                        

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity)                               (Max error 2%)

Discussion

This is one rule used to define planet velocity- we know this rule (v1v2 = constant =322) – other rules are discussed in planet velocity definition- here we ask only

Why the constant is 322?? Because 1160000 seconds = 3600 x 322 hours

Means – for example

Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance 1.16 million km – and

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance 1.16 million km-

Means- the light moves 1.16 million km but we see it as 1160000 seconds and based on this period the constant 322 hours is defined and based on this constant the planets velocities are defined- means- the planets velocities are defined as functions in the speed 1.16 million km per second

(2nd Proof) the planets orbital circumferences total is defined by light speed 1.16 million km per second- let's prove that 

100733 million km = 86400 seconds x 1160000 km/s

100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

86400 seconds       = The solar day

Means- light its speed 1.16 million km per second passes in a solar day a distance = 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

The planets data analysis proves that the solar day is the major period of time in the solar system- that because- all planets rotation periods are defined based on it- the paper proves this fact strongly

 (3rd Proof)

The planets orbits and orbital distances are created from the energy of the light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- for that- this speed is registered in the distances data – let's prove that in following

Example

778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1160000 km/s x 671 seconds

721 million km (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 1160000 km/s x 629 seconds

Where

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

This example tells that

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) created the distances based on each other- means

The light uses 671 million km (Jupiter Venus Distance) as a period of time 671 seconds to pass the distance 778.6 million km (Jupiter Orbital Distance)   

Also -the light uses 629 million km (Jupiter Earth Distance) as a period of time 629 seconds to pass the distance 721 million km (Jupiter Mercury Distance)   

By this method the light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances based on each other- means – the distances be created in one network and by one design

the previous data is example for so many other distances let's see them in following

(778.6 / 671)= (721/629) = (629/551)= (2x551/940)= (4900/4188) = (5906/5127)= (5127/4437) = (4345/3717)= 1.16

Where

778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance 

721 million km    = Jupiter Mercury Distance 

671 million km    = Jupiter Venus Distance 

629 million km    = Jupiter Earth Distance 

551 million km    = Jupiter Mars Distance 

940 million km    = Earth Orbital Circumference

4188 million km  = 2 x 2094  million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)

4900 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

5906 million km  = Pluto Orbital Distance

5127 million km  = Pluto Jupiter Distance

4437 million km  = Mercury Neptune Distance

4345 million km  = The Earth Neptune Distance

3717 million km  = Jupiter Neptune Distance

The paper provides so many other powerful proves for the speed 1.16 million km

Notice

 (1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3

The equation tells, because the solar system is created by light beam its speed 1.16million km per second with its other speed 300000 km/s

For that - the space is created in curved lines (2π) and the time is created based on the solar day (24 hours)- that explains why the planets orbital circumferences total depends on the solar day period

(4th Proof)

300000 = (205.8)^2 x 7.1 where

The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s and I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s the total be 205.8 km/s - the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s)

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect produced by speed 99% of speed of light-

Shortly- the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity for that the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared by the energy reflection

Now (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42354

The rate 7.1 causes to increase the distance from (42354 km) to (42354 x 7.1= 300000 km)- note-although 7.1 is Lorentz length contraction rate but it increases the distances in place of the contraction effect because the reflection of energy causes to reflect the geometrical effects-

shortly the equation (300000=(205.8)^ x 7.1) proves the planets velocities are defined as function in the known speed of light (300000 km/s)   

that proves the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds of light –the known speed of light 300000 km/s and the original speed of light 1.16 million km per second.

NOTICE

Lorentz length contraction effect for a velocity 99% of speed of light (297000 km/s) is (7.1) as seen in the equation but the solar system uses this rate with modification

(7.1/100)+ 1 = 1.0725

And this final rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all planets data (distances, periods, axial tilts and other data)- this effect is a proof for the motion by high velocity because this rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all data in the solar system and no explanation except Lorentz length contraction effect- more proves are in (Item No. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)

(Item No. viii) Planet creation depends on light motion

The previous analysis proves planet diameter is created depending on its orbit- specifically- planet diameter depends on its velocity and the velocity depends on its orbit- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation (where planet diameter is created depending on its velocity) and by Kepler statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity) – but-

Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity?

Where I proved no planet moves by the sun gravity- by that the planet orbital distance has no effect on this planet motion or velocity nor planet mass has any effect on its velocity-So - Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? The next data proves there's a connection between planet velocity and its orbit through light motion

DATA

300000 km                              = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 3600 x 17.73

5906 s x 300000 km/s   = 1773 million km

300000 km                              = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 3600 x 15.43

5144 s x 300000 km/s   = 1543 million km                   ((5144= 4495 x (1.0725)^2)

300000 km                              = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 3600 x 8.6

2870 s x 300000 km/s   = 8600 million km                  

300000 km                              = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 3600 x 12.26

4085 s x 300000 km/s   = 1226 million km                  

300000 km                              = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 3600 x 6.36

2120 s x 300000 km/s   = 636 million km          

Where

5906 million km            = Pluto Orbital Distance

4495 million km            = Neptune Orbital Distance

2872 million km            = Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 x Saturn Orbital Distance

4900 million km            = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

Notice

18048 million km (Uranus Orbital Circumference) = 4.4 x 4085 million km

4900 million km (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)   = 2.3 x 2120 million km

4.4 = 2.2 x 2 (with 2.3 the error 5%)

Discussion

The data shows each outer planet velocity is related to its orbital distance by effect of the light motion (300000 km/s)- Uranus and Jupiter shows the rate 4.4 which related to Jupiter (3.1 deg Jupiter axial tilt + 1.3 deg Jupiter orbital inclination)- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter that causes the two planets use the same rate.

The data proves the planets motions depend on light motion and explains how the planet orbit defines its velocity

Notice

0.8 = (27.8 /35) = (24.1/29.8) = (10.8/13.1) = (5.4/6.8) = (17.2/21.4) = 19.8/24)

Where

35 km/s       = Venus velocity  

29.8 km/s    = The Earth velocity  

27.8 km/s    = The moon velocity  

13.1 km/s    = Jupiter velocity  

6.8 km/s      = Uranus velocity  

5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity   note (10.8 = 5.4)

17.2 hours = Uranus Rotation Period

21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 h Saturn Rotation Period

19.8 hours = 2 x 9.9 h Jupiter Rotation Period

24 hours     = The solar day period

The data shows harmony between the planets velocities and their rotation periods

Third Item - My 5 Equations 

My 5 Equations Prove Planets Creation and Motions Data Is Defined By Geometrical Rules (NO Random Creation)-I provide here the three main equations (1st, 4th and 5th) let's refer to them in following 

Planet orbital distance equation (My 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do)

where d= planet orbital distance and do= its previous neighbor orbital distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                             

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

The equation depends on the planets order, just 2 neighbor planets can be used

The equation exceptions are, Earth depends on Mercury Not Venus – and Mars depends on Venus Not Earth And Pluto depends on Uranus Not Neptune

The Equation Concept Support

let's suppose–There's a right triangle by the 3 points The Sun, Mercury and Venus)- by that - Venus angle is (61 degrees) because Venus orbital distance (108.2 mkm) x cos (61) = Venus Mercury distance (50.3 mkm) – and

Earth angle is (51 degrees) because Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) x cos (51) = Earth Mercury distance (91.7 mkm) – and

Mars angle is (41.7 degrees) because Mars orbital distance (227.9mkm) x cos (41.7)= Mars Mercury distance (170 mkm)- and

Jupiter angle is (22.2 degrees) because Jupiter orbital distance (778.6 mkm) x cos (22.2)= Jupiter Mercury distance (721 mkm)

Similar to that – Saturn angle is 16.5, Uranus angle is 11.6 deg, Neptune angle is 9.2 deg and Pluto angle is 8 deg- these angles follow the same system

for example -Pluto angle is (8 degrees) because Pluto orbital distance (5906 mkm) x cos (8)= Pluto Mercury distance (5848 mkm) –

NOTICE No. (1)

The right angle and its triangle is (a hypothesis) – but we can prove it's a fact because (v1/v2) = (θ1/ θ2) -means – these angles are rated with their planets velocities – for example (Neptune velocity 5.4/ Pluto velocity 4.7) = (9.2 deg /8 deg)

NOTICE No. (2) these angles are complementary one another for that

940 = 61 x 2 x 8 = 51 x 2 x 9.2 = 41.7 x 22.2

(61 degrees) is Venus angle and (51 degrees) is The Earth angle and (41.7 degrees) is Mars angle and (8 degrees) is Pluto angle and (9.2 degrees) is Neptune angle and (22.2 degrees) is Jupiter angle

DISCUSSION

The equation and angles system data prove the following

(1)

The planets orbital distances are defined based on their neighbors and NO mass is required to define it- Newton is wrong- planet orbital distance is Not defined based on this planet mass (also planet motion doesn't depend on its mass)

Shortly- the mass is not related for the orbital distance definition at all

(2) The gravitation equation is wrong because it contradicts the planets order- for example (Mercury- Venus – the Earth) this order tells more mass needs longer orbital distance while the gravitation equation tells more mass needs shorter distance- clearly the equation contradicts the planets order- also Jupiter the greatest mass is not the more near planet to the sun – when we asked the physicist he told this is happened because of the planets initial conditions- my equation proves no initial conditions have effects on any distance – all distances are defined by the same one rule and the angles system supports the equation concept proves that (the planets orbital distances are defined based on each other and no mass is required in this definition)     

Planet Diameter Equation (My 4th equation)

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity                          

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination   

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity                        

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity      

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example  Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8                  

89143                   = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km   = Neptune diameter            

9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity             

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

All planets diameters follow this equation perfectly 

Notice- This equation is discussed with matter creation and definition (item no. I) also the equation is analyzed and discussed with all details in the paper discussions 

Planet velocity equation (My 5th equation)

Planet velocity definition is important point of study because many planet data is defined based on its velocity- specifically

Planet diameter is defined based on the rate (v1/v2) by my planet diameter equation –discussed before – and

Planet orbital distance is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^2 –and

Planet orbital period is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^3

Please note – Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and it's fact proved by the planets data – but Newton stated Planet motion depends on its mass- this is NOT Fact and Planet velocity is defined without any effect of its mass as the data shows

(I have refuted Newton theory of the sun gravity and his theory for mass gravity) 

Now – let's ask - How Is Planet Velocity Defined?

Planet velocity is defined by Five Rules let's see them in following

(i) First Rule 

v1v2 = constant= 322  (my 5th equation)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Mercury velocity)                    =322

35 km/s (Venus velocity)         x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                   =322

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity)         x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2     =322

24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)       x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)           =322 (Max error 2%)

The rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are defined in pairs and not individually, each planet velocity has its own complementary- the rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- the reflection of energy and data is discussed later. 

In this rule we interest for the constant (322)- let's ask- why the constant = 322? 

The constant 322 depends on the speed 1.16 million km per second because

(1160000 seconds = 322 hours) - Means

Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km and

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance   = 1.16 million km

Shortly -we realize that the constant 322 is produced based on the speed 1.16 million km per second- means- the planets velocities are complementary each other because they are defined as functions in this same speed 1.16 million km per second

(This is similar to electron and positron are produced from Gamma ray, The two particles depend on Gamma energy in their masses)

Based On This Data

I concluded there's a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second and from this light beam energy the solar system is created- and the planets velocities are defined as functions in this speed 1.16 million km per second and that causes the velocities to be complementary each other-

(Note the speed 1.16 million km per second is proved strongly in my paper)

(ii) Second Rule 

v1v2 = 1

The velocity here uses the solar day (86400 seconds) – let's prove that-

Mercury moves per solar day           = 4.095 million km

Venus moves per solar day               = 3.024 million km

The Earth moves per solar day                  = 2.574 million km

The Moon moves per solar day                  = 2.4 million km

Mars moves per solar day                = 2.082 million km

Jupiter moves per solar day              = 1.1318 million km

Saturn moves per solar day              = 0.838 million km

Uranus moves per solar day             = 0.5875 million km

Neptune moves per solar day           = 0.4665 million km

Pluto moves per solar day                = 0.406 million km

AND

0.406 (Pluto velocity)              x 2.4 (the moon velocity)             = 1         (error 2.5%)

0.4665 (Neptune velocity)       x 2.082 (Mars velocity)               = 1          (error 2.5%)

0.5875 (Uranus velocity)                  x 3.024 (Venus velocity)/1.772   = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.838 (Saturn velocity)            x 1.1318 (Jupiter velocity)         = 1 (error 5%)

(1.772 = π^1/2)

The second rule tells very similar meaning (v1v2= constant= 1)

The data uses the velocities per solar day for that the constant is changed from 322 into 1 but the rule is the same- (v1v2= Constant)

I want to say- the rule (v1v2 = Constant) tells that (The Velocities Are Reflected On Each Other) this conclusion is simple one (A x 1/A= constant=1)  

The rule proves the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection has effect on the planets data and for that the planets velocities are defined by this energy  reflection and the velocities are produced complementary each other as a result.

Notice the second rule causes confusion because the complementary player is changed- for example Pluto is complementary with Venus (in the first rule 35 x 4.7 x 2 = 322) but Pluto is complementary with the Earth moon in the second rule (0.406 x 2.4 = 1) that tells the players are changed which is illogical idea- how can we solve this problem? The third rule solves it – let's see this rule in following 

(iii) Third Rule 

v1/v2 = 0.8 (based on the planets order)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8   = 38 (35 km/s = Venus velocity error 7.25%)

35 km/s (Venus velocity)         x 0.8   = 27.78 (The moon velocity)

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity)         x 0.8   = 24.1 (Mars velocity)                          (error 1%)

24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)       x 0.8   = 2 x 9.7 (Saturn velocity)

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)     x 0.8   = 2 x 5.4 (Neptune velocity)       (error 3%)

6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity)      x 0.8   = 5.4 (Neptune velocity)

5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity)    x 0.8   = 4.3 (Pluto velocity 4.7 the error 7.25%)

Please note

The error 7.25 is found by the rate 1.0725 – that means

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8   = 38 = 1.0725 x 35 km/s (Venus velocity)

5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8     = 4.3= 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) / 1.0725

29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)                = 27.78 km/s (The moon velocity) x 1.0725

We know the rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length contraction effect- and we know this rate has effect on around 40% of all planets data – that's why we see this rate has effect on the planets velocities definition-

Let's remember the question-

In the rule (v1v2=322) we found that Pluto is complementary with Venus because

4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 2 = 322

But in the rule (v1v2 =1) we found Pluto is complementary with the moon because

0.406 mkm (Pluto Velocity Daily) x 2.4 mkm (The Moon Velocity Daily) = 1

The question asked – if the planets velocities are defined in pairs complementary each other and not individually how can the players be changed? 

The answer tells – the planets velocities are rated by (0.8) based on the planets order means – the moon velocity daily 2.4 mkm = Venus velocity daily 3.024 mkm x 0.8

The rate (0.8) defines all planets velocities depend on each other by order-

Now let's see Planet velocity final definition– because- the definition uses three planets velocities together and not only two – let's put that clearly in following-

 (iv) The Planet Velocity Final Definition

 (A)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 km/s (Venus velocity 35 km/s)

Venus moves per solar day 3.024 million km -But

1/3.024 = 0.3307 million km = Uranus moves per solar day 0.5875 million km /1.77

(note 1.77 = π^1/2) and (38 = 35 x 1.0725)

For that

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 322

(B)

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 km/s (The Moon velocity)

The moon moves per solar day 2.4 million km -But

1/2.4 = 0.406 million km = Pluto moves per solar day 0.406 million km

For that

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 = 322

(C)

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)

Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km -But

1/2.082 = 0.4665 million km = Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km

For that

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 = 322

(D)

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8= 2 x 5.24km/s (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s error 3%)

Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km - But

1/0.4665 = 2.082 million km = Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km

For that

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) = 322

Shortly

Three planets velocities are defined in each equation- that tells the planet velocity definition is a process more complex than the simple equation (v1v2= constant)

Notice

The 9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s – if we add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) the total will be 205.8 km/s

The planets velocities are complementary also for this velocity 205.8 km/s – let's see

205.8 km/s = Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) x Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) / 1.0725

205.8 km/s = Venus velocity (35 km/s)     x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 1.0725

205.8 km/s = Earth velocity (29.8 km/s)   x Uranus velocity (6.8 km/s)

205.8 km/s = Jupiter velocity (13.1 km/s)          x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 3

Mercury velocity = 2 Mars velocity by that Pluto will be used for Mars also

Max error (3%)

Please Note- Saturn is exceptional because

205.8 km/s = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 21.4

Where 21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 hours (Saturn rotation period) -Means- the distance is passed by all planets motions in one hour equal the distance is passed by Saturn in 2 rotation periods (21.4 hours) that tells more analysis is required for Saturn velocity- as we should do later.

A QUESTION

(Why Is The Rate (0.8) Used To Define Each Planet Velocity Based On Its neighbor?) Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and

My planet orbital distance equation proves each planet orbit is defined based on its neighbor – means- my equation uses only 2 neighbor planets orbital distances

Here also-Planet velocity is defined based on its neighbor – means- this connection enabled Kepler to conclude his statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity)

But Why The Rate (0.8)??

The rate (0.8) is found by the energy reflection effect on Planets velocities definition, for that we analyze the energy reflection process deeply in the paper discussion (CONT)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  

Curriculum Vitae                 https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                            mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com

                                      gergesgerges@yandex.ru                  

ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook                       https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 

Researcherid                  https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                                                    https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                                https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications        http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare                            https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[bocadosdefilosofia]

«Pero hasta el presente no he logrado descubrir la causa de esas propiedades de gravedad a partir de los fenómenos, y no finjo hipótesis. Pues todo lo no deducido a partir de los fenómenos ha de llamarse una hipótesis, y las hipótesis metafísicas o físicas, ya sean de cualidades ocultas o mecánicas, carecen de lugar en la filosofía experimental. En esta filosofía las proposiciones particulares se infieren a partir de los fenómenos, para luego generalizarse mediante inducción. Así se descubrieron la impenetrabilidad, la movilidad, la fuerza impulsiva de los cuerpos, las leyes del movimiento y de gravitación. Y es bastante que la gravedad exista realmente, y actúe con arreglo a las leyes que hemos expuesto, sirviendo para explicar todos los movimientos de los cuerpos celestes y de nuestro mar.»

Isaac Newton: Principios matemáticos de la Filosofía Natural. Editorial Tecnos, pág. 621. Madrid, 2011.

TGO

@bocadosdefilosofia

@dias-de-la-ira-1

[laurelesdetonia]

Aquí notarás cómo la reflexión filosófica afecta a cada cuerpo de diferente modo y, a la vez, diseña una arquitectura existencial compartida.

Disfrútenlo, compartánlo y lindo día 😘

[msrlunatj]

Guía sobre Debian: El Pilar de las Distribuciones Linux

1. Introducción

Presentación de Debian

Debian es una de las distribuciones Linux más antiguas y respetadas, conocida por su estabilidad, seguridad y adherencia a los principios del software libre. Fundada en 1993 por Ian Murdock, Debian ha servido como base para muchas otras distribuciones populares, incluyendo Ubuntu.

Importancia y legado de Debian en el ecosistema Linux

Como una de las "distribuciones madre", Debian ha jugado un papel crucial en el desarrollo y popularización de Linux. Su robustez y compromiso con el software libre lo han convertido en una elección preferida tanto para servidores como para entornos de escritorio.

2. Historia y Filosofía de Debian

Origen y evolución de Debian

Debian fue creado con la intención de ser una distribución gestionada de manera abierta y colaborativa. Desde su lanzamiento, ha tenido múltiples versiones, cada una con nombres basados en personajes de la película "Toy Story".

Filosofía y compromiso con el software libre

Debian sigue estrictamente las Directrices de Software Libre de Debian (DFSG), lo que significa que todo el software incluido en la distribución debe ser libre. Además, su contrato social garantiza la transparencia y la cooperación dentro de la comunidad.

3. Características Clave de Debian

Estabilidad y seguridad

Debian es conocido por su estabilidad, lo que lo convierte en una opción confiable para servidores y sistemas de producción. Las actualizaciones y nuevos paquetes se prueban rigurosamente antes de ser lanzados en la versión estable.

Gestor de paquetes

APT (Advanced Package Tool) es el gestor de paquetes principal de Debian. APT facilita la instalación, actualización y eliminación de software desde los repositorios de Debian.

Comandos básicos: sudo apt update, sudo apt install [paquete], sudo apt remove [paquete].

Formatos de paquetes soportados

Debian soporta varios tipos de archivos para la instalación de software:

.deb: El formato nativo de Debian para la instalación de paquetes.

.appimage: Formato portátil que puede ejecutarse directamente sin necesidad de instalación.

.snap: Aunque no es nativo de Debian, se puede habilitar soporte para instalar paquetes Snap.

.flatpak: Otro formato universal que puede ser instalado en Debian, aunque requiere la instalación previa de Flatpak.

Ramas de desarrollo

Stable (Estable): Ideal para entornos donde la estabilidad es crítica.

Testing (Pruebas): Contiene paquetes más recientes y es una buena opción para usuarios que desean un equilibrio entre estabilidad y novedades.

Unstable (Inestable/Sid): Donde se introduce el software más nuevo y experimental.

Amplia compatibilidad de hardware

Debian soporta una amplia gama de arquitecturas de hardware, desde las más comunes como x86 y ARM, hasta plataformas más especializadas.

4. Proceso de Instalación de Debian

Requisitos mínimos del sistema

Procesador: Pentium 4 o posterior.

Memoria RAM: 512 MB para un sistema básico, 1 GB o más recomendado para un entorno de escritorio completo.

Espacio en disco: 10 GB mínimo, 20 GB o más recomendados para una instalación con múltiples aplicaciones y entornos de escritorio.

Tarjeta gráfica: Compatible con X Window System.

Unidad de CD/DVD o puerto USB para la instalación.

Descarga y preparación del medio de instalación

El sitio web oficial de Debian ofrece imágenes ISO para descargar. Se puede preparar un USB booteable usando herramientas como Rufus o balenaEtcher.

Guía paso a paso para la instalación

Selección del entorno de instalación: Debian ofrece opciones de instalación tanto gráfica como en modo texto.

Configuración de particiones: Se puede optar por particionado automático o manual, dependiendo de las necesidades del usuario.

Configuración de la red y selección de paquetes: Durante la instalación, se configuran las opciones de red y se seleccionan los paquetes de software esenciales.

Primeros pasos post-instalación

Actualización del sistema: Es recomendable ejecutar sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade para asegurarse de que el sistema esté completamente actualizado.

Instalación de controladores y software adicional: Dependiendo del hardware, puede ser necesario instalar controladores específicos. Además, se pueden instalar entornos de escritorio adicionales o programas específicos.

5. Entornos de Escritorio en Debian

Gnome (predeterminado)

Gnome es el entorno de escritorio predeterminado en Debian, conocido por su simplicidad y enfoque en la productividad.

KDE Plasma

Un entorno de escritorio altamente personalizable que ofrece una experiencia visualmente atractiva.

Xfce

Ligero y eficiente, ideal para sistemas con recursos limitados.

LXQt y otros

Alternativas para quienes buscan un entorno aún más ligero o con diferentes características.

6. Gestión de Paquetes en Debian

APT: El gestor de paquetes de Debian

Comandos básicos: apt-get, apt-cache, aptitude.

Instalación y eliminación de paquetes: sudo apt install [paquete], sudo apt remove [paquete].

Repositorios y backports

Debian ofrece diferentes repositorios: stable, testing, y unstable, así como backports que permiten instalar versiones más recientes de software en la rama estable.

Configuración de repositorios adicionales

Los usuarios pueden añadir repositorios adicionales en el archivo /etc/apt/sources.list para acceder a más software.

7. Debian en el Entorno Empresarial y Servidores

Uso de Debian en servidores

Debian es ampliamente utilizado en servidores debido a su estabilidad y seguridad. Es ideal para aplicaciones web, bases de datos, y como servidor de correo, entre otros.

Mantenimiento y soporte a largo plazo

Debian ofrece soporte a largo plazo (LTS) para sus versiones estables, garantizando actualizaciones de seguridad por al menos cinco años.

Herramientas de administración y automatización

Debian se integra bien con herramientas como Ansible, Puppet, y Docker, facilitando la gestión de infraestructuras complejas.

8. Comparativa de Debian con Otras Distribuciones

Debian vs. Ubuntu

Objetivo: Ubuntu se basa en Debian y se orienta más hacia el usuario final, con actualizaciones más frecuentes y un enfoque en la facilidad de uso.

Filosofía: Mientras que Debian sigue estrictamente los principios del software libre, Ubuntu incluye software propietario para mejorar la compatibilidad y experiencia del usuario.

Debian vs. CentOS

Objetivo: CentOS, basado en Red Hat, es otra opción popular para servidores, enfocada en la estabilidad y soporte a largo plazo en entornos empresariales.

Filosofía: CentOS es más conservador en cuanto a actualizaciones, mientras que Debian, aunque estable, ofrece más flexibilidad en la gestión de paquetes.

Debian vs. Arch Linux

Objetivo: Arch Linux es para usuarios avanzados que desean un sistema minimalista y personalizado, con un modelo de actualización continua (rolling release).

Filosofía: Debian prioriza la estabilidad, mientras que Arch sigue la filosofía KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) y proporciona control total al usuario.

9. Conclusión

Debian como una opción sólida y confiable

Debian sigue siendo una de las distribuciones más confiables y seguras disponibles. Su enfoque en la estabilidad y el software libre lo convierte en una elección excelente para usuarios, administradores de sistemas y desarrolladores.

Recomendaciones finales para quienes consideran usar Debian

Debian es ideal para aquellos que valoran la estabilidad sobre la última tecnología y están dispuestos a invertir tiempo en aprender sobre su gestión y mantenimiento.

10. Preguntas Frecuentes (FAQ)

¿Debian es adecuado para principiantes?

Aunque Debian es más técnico que distribuciones como Ubuntu, es accesible para principiantes con paciencia y disposición para aprender.

¿Cómo actualizo mi sistema Debian?

Ejecutando sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade mantendrás tu sistema actualizado.

¿Es Debian una buena opción para servidores?

Sí, Debian es muy utilizado en servidores debido a su estabilidad, seguridad y soporte a largo plazo.

[notasfilosoficas]

“El impulso más profundo de la naturaleza humana es el deseo de ser importante”

John Dewey

Fue un pedagogo, psicólogo y filósofo estadounidense nacido en Burlington Vermont en octubre de 1859.

Se le considera junto con Charles Sanders Pierce y William James, uno de los fundadores de la filosofía del pragmatismo, que representa por su extensión, profundidad y valor epistemológico, la contribución mas original de los Estados Unidos a la filosofía occidental.

Sus padres provenían de sólidas familias de terratenientes de Vermont, las cuales estaban vinculadas a la primera iglesia congregacional de Burlington, en donde el ambiente social tenía una marcada tradición demócrata, orgullosos de sus orígenes “New England” y de su espíritu de independencia.

Después de haberse graduado en Burlington y de haber enseñado en la High School de Oil City, en 1884, obtiene un doctorado en la Universidad John Hopkins, estudiando lógica, filosofía y psicología experimental.

Es Sylvester Morris, un intelectual de formación alemana quien introducirá a Dewey en un modelo orgánico de filosofía, siguiendo las huellas del idealismo Hegeliano, en tanto Stanley Hall, le proporcionaría un enfoque metodológico científico sobre las ciencias humanas, y una relación filosófica y psicológica montada sobre una dimensión ética.

Instrumentalismo.

La filosofía de Dewey es una forma de pragmatismo definida como “Instrumentalismo”, una filosofía en la que hay que tomar en cuenta la relación dinámica del hombre con el ambiente, en donde el hombre está obligado, desde el inicio de su historia, a medirse con la inestabilidad de los eventos que le tocan afrontar, y vencerlos para así garantizar su supervivencia.

Bajo el criterio de Dewey, la existencia humana se presenta como incierta e inestable. Un mundo en donde la posibilidad de riesgo es continua, y en donde la inteligencia por consecuencia, se desarrolla y potencia.

Para Dewey el hombre desarrolla una interacción instrumental en relación con la experiencia, para resolver una situación problemática que permita una reorganización de la realidad que consienta una mejor adaptación del hombre a su ambiente mediante el uso de la inteligencia.

Para entender la clave del discurso filosófico de Dewey es necesario definir el concepto de “experiencia”, que es central en toda su visión, y en donde ésta, expresa la colocación del hombre en el mundo, con su propia interioridad y su propio yo, en la cual esta involucrado un poder eficaz de la comunicación y de la mente.

Dewey sostenía que las disciplinas de filosofía, pedagogía y psicología debían entenderse como estrechamente relacionados entre si. 

El trabajo de Dewey en la Universidad de Chicago entre 1894 y 1904, junto con el de su colega Rowland Angell hizo de la institución un centro de renombre mundial del movimiento funcionalista de psicología.

Sus ideas funcionalistas fueron influenciadas por la teoría de la evolución de Darwin, sus propias ideas y las de William James.

Experimentó con programas de estudio y métodos, combinando exitosamente la teoría y la práctica, en contraposición a los métodos autoritarios de enseñanza tradicionales y el aprendizaje de memoria. Fue también pionero en promover la participación de los padres en el proceso educativo.

Su primer libro influyente sobre educación titulado “La escuela y la sociedad” (1899) influyó en las ideas y prácticas educativas en todo el mundo.

El modelo deweyano de educación democrática y anti-autoritaria, es el objeto de uno de sus mas importantes ensayos titulado “Democracia y Educación” en el cual centra la dignidad de la persona como alumno en la que para ser eficaz la enseñanza debe ir acompañada de los propios intereses del alumno, a fin de liberarse de todo conocimiento dogmático, sometiendo sus propias convicciones al banco de pruebas de la experiencia. 

En el terreno político y de la educación, Dewey fue el primer presidente de la Asociación Americana de Profesores Universitarios en 1915, y en 1920 ayudó a organizar la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles.

En los años siguientes, inspeccionó prácticas educativas en varios países del extranjero entre ellos Turquía, México y la Unión Soviética. Después de su retiro en 1930, continuó con su defensa de causas políticas y educativas.

John Dewey muere en junio de 1952 a la edad de 92 años.

Fuentes: Wikipedia, philosophica.info, biografias.es biografiasyvidas.com

[historiassimples]

Una cartal al yo de mañana

Me escribo eso para cuando reciba la noticia que tanto llevo esperando

¿Qué siente cuando estás a unas 12 horas o menos de recibir una noticia que puede cambiar el rumbo de tu vida? Si me lo preguntaran, siento tranquilidad; no creo que las grandes transformaciones en la vida sucedan a la ligera, considero que todo proceso se construye de forma paulatina, a pulso como me gusta decirlo a mí.

Durante más tiempo del que logro recordar he soñado con estudiar literatura en una universidad de prestigio; sé que mi pregrado, parcialmente, es un programa que involucra la literatura con la filosofía, sin embargo aquello que más pasión me genera en la vida es el estudio de los libros, las historias, las narraciones y los relatos.

En el pasado, intenté con inmadurez conseguir un cupo en alguna universidad para estudiar esta área del conocimiento por la que siento tanto gusto. Para aquel que no lo sepa, no lo logré. Cuando estaba por graduarme del colegio no contaba con el dinero suficiente para irme a la capital a comenzar una vida de cero. Tiempo después, en una crísis, quise renunciar a mi pregrado y comenzarlo de nuevo en la capital, pero mi familia no me apoyo en ese entonces, por lo que tuve que postergarlo. Luego, apliqué a varios programas de maestrías en literatura en Europa, tuve la fortuna de ser admitido, solo que no logré graduarme a tiempo y tuve que desistir de esta idea.

Ahora, con medios económicos, físicos y espirituales para materializar mis más grandes deseos, me veo a unas pocas horas de tener noticias de la mejor maestría de literatura en Colombia y pese a lo que mi mente podría decirme, hay algo dentro mío que exclama -Ten calma Lucas.

De todo corazón quisiera ser admitido en este programa de maestría, siento que es aquel donde podría comenzar a trazar bocetos sobre la figura literaria en la que anhelo convertirme. No obstante, no es esta la única opción que tengo, de forma simultánea estoy aplicando a otra universidad en la capital, ya fui admitido a un programa de literatura en una de las mejores universidades del país y estoy a la espera de su ayuda financiera, e incluso, me encuentro en proceso de aplicación a más de diez programas de literatura en Europa, por lo cual, me permito decirme a mí mismo -Si este programa no fue, habrá algún otro que sí será.

De este pensamiento llega a mi cabeza uno de los textos que más me ha impactado los últimos días, el poema "Los Barcos" de Constantino Cavafis. En esta pieza literaria se describe cómo los barcos parten de una plaza para recoger todo su cargamento, pero a medida que entran en el oceano, se ven se ven a merced, de las intenpestades del clima, los caprichos de los tripulantes y los intereses de los funcionarios portuarios, para solo entregar una parte del cargamento inicial, aquel que debía ser entregado en el puerto.

Esto me lleva a pensar que la embarcación de mi vida, aquella que ha hecho posible que viaje, trabaje y experimente todas las sensaciones de estar vivo en su máximo esplendor, no suele llegar a tierra firma intacta, pues debe transformarse, de cambiar y convertirse en algo valioso, en lo que le corresponde ser.

Por lo anterior, abro mi corazón y vida a que la carga que llevo en mi barco llegue como deba llegar a su destino final. Si mañana descubro que soy admitido en el programa que me permitirá ser docente y estudiante de una de las mejores universidades de América Latina y el mundo, está bien. Lo recibiré con el amor que corresponde, entendiendo que di lo mejor de mí en el proceso, aunque si llega a suceder lo opuesto, si no soy admitido en esta modalidad de docente asociado y estudiante de posgrado, también lo recibiré con amor, dado que confío en que algo mejor seguro llegará.

Hoy más que nunca, veo con claridad cómo la vida se define por las oportunidades que tenemos, incluso aquellas que terminamos perdiendo. Por lo tanto, si el universo y Dios me llevan a ser estudiante y funcionario de la Universidad de Los Andes, lo aprovecharé con toda la energía que habita en mi ser, pero si no es así, también tomaré esto como una señal, un mensaje que se traduce en seguir intentándolo en otros lugares.

Sé que todo saldrá bien y que mi embarcación, donde sea que llegue a arribar, lo hará con un propósito: con la esperanza de cumplir mi sueño de formarme como estudiante de literatura.

[precedentes6]

Pienso que el ridículo es el elemento dinámico, creador e innovador de toda conciencia que se quiera viva y que experimente lo vivo. No conozco ninguna transfiguración de la humanidad, ningún salto audaz en la comprensión de ningún descubrimiento pasional fecundo que no haya parecido ridículo a sus contemporáneos. Pero eso no es prueba suficiente, pues todo lo que supera el presente y el límite de la comprensión parece ridículo. Hay otro aspecto del ridículo y ése es el que me interesa, la disponibilidad, la vida eterna, la fecundidad eterna de un acto, de un pensamiento o de una actitud ridícula. El ridículo nos enseña siempre, cada uno lo puede asimilar e interpretar a su manera, se es libre de sacar de él lo que se quiera y de hacer con él todo lo que uno desee.

(...)

Creo que una buena definición del ridículo sería ésta: lo que puede ser retomado y profundizado por otro. No me refiero al ridículo maquinal, como el del hombre vulgar con una chistera o la niña haciéndose pasar por mujer fatal. Ése es un ridículo superficial, un ridículo social creado por automatismos e inhibiciones, sin fecundidad espiritual, como todo acto reflejo.

(...)

Todo acto que no sea ridículo, en mayor o menor medida, es un acto muerto. Esto se verifica en la más cotidiana y banal vida social. Cuando uno toma el té en un salón y vuelve a colocar la taza en su sitio, realiza un acto perfecto, un acto muerto, pues no hay consecuencias ni en su conciencia ni la de los demás. Pero ¡deja caer la taza al suelo derramando el té en la falda de una señorita que habla francés y pídele excusas tartamudeando mientras tratas de borrar la metedura de pata secando el parquet con el pañuelo de batista! Por un instante eres ridículo, pura y simplemente ridículo. De pronto, el acto se llena de innumerables virtualidades. Lo estás pasando mal y en ese instante de turbación y de pánico comprendes que tu vida es inútil, que la de los demás está vacía, que eres un mono grotesco bien vestido y perfectamente arreglado en un salón a donde se va a perder el tiempo, adonde se va empujado por el miedo a la soledad, por atracción hacia las vacuidades. Toda una filosofía a partir de una taza de té rota por descuido. ¡Y eso no es nada!, porque sólo has sido ridículo en una mínima proporción. Ve a decirles a la cara lo que piensas de su té, que en el fondo es lo que piensa todo ser dotado de razón, diles francamente que se están engañando, que llevan una vida artificial, fáctica, inútil. Diles todo eso y dilo con pasión. Entonces serás realmente ridículo, entonces la gente se burlará de ti, entonces comprenderás que no puedes vivir tu vida sin ser ridículo.

Porque el ridículo se resume en esto: vivir tu vida, desnuda, inmediata, rechazando las supersticiones, las convenciones y los dogmas. Cuanto más personales somos, más nos identificamos con nuestras intenciones, más coinciden nuestros actos con nuestras ideas, y más ridículos somos.

El ridículo es una forma lanzada por los hombres contra la insinceridad. No existe acto humano sincero que no sea ridículo. Lo que el amor tiene de realmente exaltante consiste en haber logrado suprimir el ridículo entre dos seres, suprimir la censura aplicada de un modo maquinal a su sinceridad. El amor sólo es ridículo para una tercera persona. Las otras grandes sinceridades lo son también para una segunda persona.

(...)

Fragmentos de Invitación al ridículo

Mircea Eliade

[vientodecafe]

Me enamoré de un señor del café

(De está nota no tengo fecha, nos estábamos conociendo)

Hola señor del café. Ahora me dieron ganas de escribir (te) en respuesta a todo lo que se me ha quedado de tus podcasts.

Te cuento que a los podcast los llamo yo vagones de tren.

Este vagón (si fuera un audio), sería sobre los podcast y blogs. Tienes mucha razón sobre los blogs, ya casi nadie los lee. Había blogs muy chidos de música. Me gustaba mucho uno que se llamaba Microphones in the trees, desde dónde conocía música generalmente ambiental, experimental y relacionada con la naturaleza. Te lo voy a compartir. Yo casi no escucho podcasts, el último que escuché fue uno que me recomendó Sofía ( la bruja) del eneagrama. Volví a confirmar lo que ya había confirmado hace más de diez años, que soy un cuatro. Recomiéndame un podcast mañanero.

Este vagón es sobre el centro de Querétaro. Me fascinó todo lo que me dijiste sobre ver desde otro lugar. También ese curso de creatividad que le dabas a las señoras, muy chido el enfoque-programa-estrategia que te inventaste, me dieron ganas de tomarlo también con las señoras (imaginarias.para mi). Me imaginé a unas señoras parecidas a las de mi seminario de literatura, señoras de unos cincuenta años para arriba, amantes de los talleres de arte, literatura y filosofía, que se dedican a tomar cursos, leer, pintar y a cuidar de sus gatos. Muchas de ellas llevan lentes, algunos cuadrados y grandes, otros redondos y grandes, otros simplemente lentes.

Ay, y eso que dices es cierto, de los lugares conocidos a los que uno vuelve después de mucho tiempo. Las últimas veces que fui al centro fue justo el año pasado, mi exposición, el 27 de febrero, y luego a recoger mi obra dos meses después. Ahora que volví caminé muchas cuadras en busca de un cajero para pagar el estacionamiento. Los colores de los vestidos de quinceañera, el olor de los churros, la tienda de libros viejos, y mucha gente. Un viejito que llevaba un carrito lleno de basura reciclable, guardando una botella de licor casi vacía. El ruido, música, coches, camiones que contaminan.

Este vagón es sobre el límite de la lluvia.

Tengo una historia. Estaba en preparatoria, quizás cuarto o quinto semestre en Cuernavaca. Pasó muy rápido, me tocó ver el límite por unos segundos, frente a mí, hasta que avanzó y nos cubrió la lluvia. No me importaba mojarme porque mi casa estaba a dos cuadras del Tec. Pero mis amig@s salieron corriendo. Fue la primera vez (y única) que presencié el límite de la lluvia. Gracias por el video que es muy bello.

Este vagón es sobre Nana. Escucho que es hermosa. Quiero verla en una fotografía :)

Sé que no te gusta leer, al menos en la computadora-celular. Yo aveces escribo. Me dormí temprano y ahora me desperté sin sueño. Haber si logro dormir otra vez. En medio de mi insomnio me encontré con tu audio y te escuché y para no romper con la calma de la noche, aquí en mi casa, preferí escribir. Te voy a compartir los grillos que suenan aquí en temporadas.

Tengo algunas preguntas:

¿Cómo te gusta que te digan? Ro, Rodrigo. (Además de Chef)

¿Cuál es la historia de tu bigote?

Ten una chida-noche.

[kpwx]

«Filosofía de la cirugía», de René Leriche

Leer Filosofía de la cirugía se ha sentido (al menos durante la mitad del libro) como si René Leriche me estuviese clavando un escalpelo en cada ojo. En mi inocencia había pensado que esta obra sería más o menos parecida a Filosofía de la medicina de Bunge, pero ni cerca estuvieron. No hay, de todos modos, engaño: el mismo Leriche advierte en la introducción que le dio este título únicamente por no haber encontrado otro que encajara mejor. ¿Qué fue lo que me encontré? Un ejemplo aleatorio:

La experimentación de Reilly ha sido especialmente practicada para el riñón: la inyección en el adventicio de las arterias renales de una suspensión de tripol en sílice coloidal va seguida de un edema agudo de riñón y de una desintegración de los endotelios vasculares que pronto no están ya representados más que por unos residuos amorfos sobre los cuales están aplicados los nódulos, viéndose evolucionar una glomerulonefritis.

Este… ¿Qué? Bueno, yo solito me metí en esas cosas. En cualquier caso, no todo el libro es tan terminológicamente incompensable como ese párrafo; por ejemplo, el capítulo que le dedica al humanismo en la cirugía está bastante bien, y otras partes en las que trata aspectos más generales de la medicina también son fáciles de entender. A pesar de lo técnico que es más de alguna idea interesante logré retener, y eso ya me es suficiente. 

Leriche cita casi como si fuera la Biblia la Introducción al estudio de la medicina experimental de Claude Bernard, un libro que compré por casualidad en una época en la que ni siquiera se me había despertado el interés por estos temas. Habrá que leerlo.

[itsgerges]

Best Regards

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis

or

or

or

Basic Critic Against The Physics Book

It's the main problem I found in the solar system Geometry- the Physicist sees something but the designer sees another thing– these are two different visions for the same solar system- that answers (Why Are So Many Theories In The Physics Book Just Imaginary Ideas And Not Facts?)– let's discuss this problem

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes that there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the mass (for example) as wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and for that the physicist searched for this (unit) because it's the (unit) by which the wall is building (the mass is building)– this is the physicist thinking direction- he believed there's a small unit by which the great building is built

For that the physicist searched and found the particle and then the particle is divided into Molecules then the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- the unit by which the building is built – or the unit by which the mass is built – for that the physicist divides (any thing) to see its contents till reach to the unit which can be used as the building unit. 

The Designer Vision

The designer aims to create integration- as the marriage – male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child

INTEGRATION this is the word inside the designer Mind

No building unit- the marriage answers- because in marriage both (male and female) are required and no one of them better than the other – both work together and give equal effects on the same one process and give together one result- I explain the idea by the marriage because it's easy to understand- I want to put the word (Integration) as the basic concept in the designer mind

And

I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method

While the physicist divides the elements one after one (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which he considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process

Let's return to the marriage- the marriage requires two players (male and female)- they have different bodies and the process give birth for children- Suppose we remove one player what would happen? (where can we find a woman pregnant by herself?)

I want to say- the division from (matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) destroys the general geometrical design which uses the integration process- let's give other examples

Example No. (1)   

Einstein told us (He can't find slightest meaning for the word SPACE) by that he can't define (what's the space) and also he found the space has no mechanical features because no definition causes these features – this is the physicist vision - Let's see the designer vision

Planet moves and its motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and where's the energy? the planet can't store its motion energy inside its body because this energy would raise the planet temperature and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- so- where's the planet motion energy? logically we suppose that- the energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- the planet moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space (as the fish swims in the sea and its motion creates waves in the sea water) similar to that the planet motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space- by that we can define the space and conclude the space nature and features- simply we conclude the space has mechanical features because the energy is stored in the space as moving waves- the gravitational waves prove the space has motion- why we can solve the question which Einstein couldn't solve? Because he supposed the planet is independent from the space- the integration concept is not known by him

Notice

The waves are produced by the planet motion energy are the gravitational waves, the paper first hypothesis proves these waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field also the hypothesis proves the Sun doesn't produce a gravitational field.   

Example No. (2)   

The scientists stated (The Sun Rays Are Created By The Sun Nuclear Fusion Process)

Why?

Because they think the sun is independent from the planets and each planet is independent from the other– the harmony motion can not prove all players are created from one unified source (one energy) - the integration is not seeing here 

But

We can reach to the facts simply- because- the planet moves and produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy is stored in the space in moving waves-

The simple idea tells (the energy can NOT be stored in the space forever) this stored energy must be used- here we see how the sun rays is created- clearly- the Sun Is NOT Doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays- why? because the solar system is very rich in the motion energy and massive motion energy is stored in the space logically this stored energy must be used by some method- based on that- I conclude – the sun rays are produced from this stored energy regardless the production mechanism (means even if I don't know how the sun rays is produced by this energy) I still can confirm that the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies which are stored in the solar system space as moving waves-

I wish I explain the idea clearly -I can discover the space nature and features by planet motion analysis – why? because of the integration- they do one unified job together and each player can be defined by the analysis for the other player.

Notice The paper second hypothesis tells (the sun rays is created by the gravitational waves motions and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies, means the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies total) the hypothesis is discussed and proved in the paper abstract and discussion

The Concept Problem -the problem is the eyes – the physicist eyes should see the integration while the integration is growing– let's give example to see this problem

The Earth and its moon move together and they create integrated motion- that shows unified motion by the two planets – but this integration is growing by Venus Motion effect on both planets and by that we have greater integration contains (The Earth- The Moon – Venus) – But Mars also has effect on the three planets – that shows greater integration contains the four planets and of Course Mercury has effect on all and that created greater integration contains the inner planets –

The integration is growing till contain all planets and the Sun together – why?- because it's One Unified Energy behind all players

It needs one genius can understand all these motions and their effects on each other to create one unified motion and one unified effect

The physicist needs very wide eyes can see the great integrated system and all small integrated systems inside it– (something like a great chess board which have hundreds of pieces- if the eyes can see all pieces motions and their effects)

The Concept Use Difficulty-

Why is it hard to discover the integration in the solar system?

Because the geometrical rules are not known and by that we don't know what effect is produced by this integration – the paper hypotheses provide examples to explain that.

PAPER FIRST HYPOTHESIS

Paper first hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (Moreover the sun is not producing a gravitational field) and

The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and (From Uranus to Jupiter) and (from Venus to Mars) –

The gravitational waves reflection causes changes in the planets data- and these changes are repeated with each reflection- means- these changes are found by rules because it's repeated with each reflection clearly- that shows the planets use similar behaviors to create their data which proves one reason causes to create all this data

Also- the wave energy reflection causes to square the wave velocity – the velocity square is the most important feature of the energy reflection because it enables the waves to move by speed of light- that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light in the solar system- the motion by speed of light is produced only by the wave energy reflection (and without the reflection this motion can't be done)     

Paper 1st hypothesis (The objective of the hypothesis)

I prove that the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and these waves are reflected in the solar system three time and the reflection of the wave energy causes to square the wave velocity (the velocity squaring is the important feature I prove in the paper because the light beam is reflected but its speed is NOT squared and that means the wave velocity squaring is feature of the space) and it's very important to prove the wave velocity is squared by the reflection because this process enables the waves to move by speed of light and that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light – as this new article states

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- here I explain how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light (please note the article still believes the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field – I refuse this idea – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies but the article states that the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam and I accept this idea and I explain and prove how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light) 

Paper 1st hypothesis Proof (The Proving Method)

I compare between the planets data in the three reflections of the wave- I put the planets data in comparison to each other for each reflection to prove the planets use similar behaviors to define their data and this similar behavior proves one force (or one reason) is found behind- and this one reason is the wave energy reflection which causes to create all this data –

The wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design (A Summary)

The reflections cause defined changes in the planets data – and

The most important change is (the wave velocity square) – and this velocity squaring is very important because it enable the gravitational waves to move by speed of light – the motion by speed of light is very effective on the solar system design because it defines the planets distribution between the sun and Pluto– this fact is explained in point no. (**) 

Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation and Proof Discussion

Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation and Proof Discussion

The explanation is discussed in two parts

1ST PART

I- Preface

II- The Comparison

III- The explanation of the wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design

2nd PART

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Detailed Discussion

(Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation) 1ST PART

I- Preface

(1)

Planet Motion Energy Analysis

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

(2)

These Waves Are The Gravitational Waves (My Hypothesis)

Mans- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies- these waves are the gravitational waves- it's my paper 1st hypothesis- the gravitational waves are not produced by the gravitational field (moreover the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field) instead the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies 

AND

The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND 

In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

The 1st Conclusion

The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space

Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves  -

Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why?

The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

(3)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- 

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-

Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.  

(iii)

The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-

(iv)

The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                              

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)  

Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The 2nd Conclusion

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

(4)

The Energy Reflection Trajectory

Let's remember what we know till now

(a)

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy creates waves in the space and each wave moves by its planet velocity- these waves move toward Pluto (perpendicular on the revolution direction) and in Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by velocity = the planets velocities total = 205.8 km/s  

Means- while the planets revolve around the sun in their orbits by their velocities- there's one unified wave revolves around the sun moving by 205.8 km/s and this unified wave revolves around The Sun In Pluto Orbit-this unified wave is The Gravitational Wave  

Now- this unified wave is reflected from Pluto to Venus orbit- Means- the unified wave is reflected and sent from Pluto to Neptune to the next planets till reach Venus 

The unified wave is reflected three times in the solar system

(from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and

(from Uranus and Jupiter) and

(from Venus to Mars)

With each reflection of the wave defined changes are done for the planets data

But let's refer to the general design behind these three reflections in following

(b)

We remember this new article

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam-

My hypothesis tells (the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity)

Let's put the ideas beside one another to see the general design

The gravitational waves can move by speed of light AND can produce a light beam – How?? if the motion is done by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) how can this motion produce a light beam? Because the light beam is produced from the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) – here we see the energy reflection effect- the wave moves by speed of light and when this wave is reflected its velocity is squared and produced the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) from which the light beam is created-

Means

The machine needs one reflection to change the speed from (speed of light C=30000 km/s to the value C^2 =squared speed of light) and by that the light beam is created

Now – let's ask -

How can the wave moves by speed of light?

We remember- the one unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves in Pluto orbit with velocity 205.8 km/s – how can this gravitational wave moves by speed of light? 

By another reflection of energy – let's see that in following

300000 km/s = (205.8 km/s)^2 x 7.1

This equation tells

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities

(205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s

Means the gravitational wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s

BUT

If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1

Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1

BUT

The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect

The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light) 

That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

Here we see clearly that

The machine needs one energy reflection only to accelerate the wave velocity from 205.8 km/s to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

And

The machine needs one more reflection only to change the wave speed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2 =squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Shortly -the machine needs only two reflections of energy to produce the light beam from the gravitational waves motions

Now – let's ask– Why Are There Three Reflections Of Energy In The Solar System? If The Machine Needs Just Two Reflections Why The Machine Uses Three Reflections? 

Because

Pluto reflected the energy toward Neptune but Neptune didn't send the energy to Uranus instead Neptune captured and energy and used it for its orbit and by that the energy be stored in Neptune orbit can didn't reach to Uranus- this effect of Neptune motion caused great problem in the solar system- in that time Saturn was not created yet- and Uranus couldn't release the energy from Neptune orbit for that Uranus made an interaction with the Earth and by this interaction Saturn is created for that Saturn is a planet its father is Uranus and its mother is the Earth- Saturn move depends on Uranus and the Earth motions- and -Saturn released the energy from Neptune orbit – for that – the first reflection is from Neptune to Saturn – that's why I call this reflection (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) because it’s the energy of Pluto but it's captured in Neptune orbit and Saturn released the energy from Neptune orbit (The 1st reflection of energy)  and Saturn sent the energy immediately to Uranus and Uranus reflected the energy to Jupiter  (The 2nd  reflection of energy) and Jupiter sent the energy to Venus and Venus reflected the energy to Mars  (The 3rd reflection of energy)- Now – we understand that – Neptune effect caused to reflect the energy one more time – if Neptune is not found in the solar system the energy would be reflected two times only and they will be enough to produce the light beam

(c)

Please note- the two reflections in the outer planets are done to produce a result of one reflection only and for that the two reflections are complementary one another as we will discuss- and – the solar system general design depends only on two reflections- means- spite they are three reflections and we will see in details each reflection effect but the solar system general design depends on two reflections because the third reflection is found because of Neptune negative effect- means- it's found only for repair the negative effect and if Neptune negative effect is removed this 3rd reflection will be removed for that the design depends on 2 reflections only- discussed later

(5)

 Planet Definition 

(A)

The physics book defines the planet as (Planet is solid body created independently from the space and the other planets)–if so- how can the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data??

My definition for the planet is

Planet is a geometrical point carried on the moving energy (or Planet is a geometrical point found on a light beam) – let's explain this definition in following

The matter and space both are created from the same one energy- means

The planets matters and their distances both are created from the same one energy- the matter and space move depending on the motion of this energy from which they are created-means- the matter isn't moving by the mass gravity – Newton is wrong- the matter moves by the motion of the energy from which the matter is created- 

Based on this idea

The space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a geometrical frame (a distinguished form from the space) and moves by a different velocity from the space motion- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish form from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- this explanation shows how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters how is this whirlpool created? and why does its diameter equal = 2 meters? The diameter is created as a result for the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also-   

Let's give another example

The energy motion is similar to the blood motion in a creature body- suppose- we examine now a liver of human - the blood motion causes this liver to work perfectly but if the blood motion is changed that would cause changes for the liver cells and job – suppose the blood have some poison the liver will be dead- suppose the pressure is raised- I want to say- the liver is a piece of body (matter) but it depends on the blood motion and this blood motion defines this liver dimensions and data- 

Shortly–the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle may be so strong as a rock but it depends on the blood motion (similar to that the matter is found depending on the motion of energy from which this matter is created)

That explains how the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data- still the planet is a solid body and the wave is a wave- the wave can be reflected but the solid body can NOT be reflected spite of that the planets data is reflected one another because the reflected waves have effects on the moving energy by which this planet (solid body) is created-

(B)

We should see the depth of this new definition-

The definition tells us

The matter (planet) is created by energy and the matter moves with this energy- means- this energy is the mother of this matter- this energy created the matter and caused this matter motion-BUT- this definition tells- the matter motion is defined before the matter creation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- How can that be possible? Because –

The energy is found alone in motion (the sea water was in motion) and the energy created the matter and this matter dimensions and data is defined based on the energy motion features (as discussed before- the whirlpool "vortex" is created with diameter 2 meters and this diameter is defined by the water motion features "velocity- pressure- angle- amount …etc") by that the matter dimensions are defined by the mother energy motion features - AND after the matter creation, the matter moves with the mother energy- by that- the created matter moves the same motion based on which this matter dimensions and data is defined- that explains how the planet motion is defined before the planet creation-

This fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because it proves strongly that the planet diameter is created based on its velocity- means- the equation proves – for example – Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s and Neptune velocity is defined before Neptune diameter- let's remember this equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity                                                         

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination        (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example    

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8                

89143          = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km     = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity

59800 days  = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

The Equation Concept (A Summary)

Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result  

The designer created the planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved-

(C)

The previous explanation helps us to see how the planet is created- also we remember Kepler rule (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity)  

The orbit is created at first and the orbit defines the motion velocity and the planet diameter is created based on this velocity –means- the space is created before the matter creation- Shortly- The planet orbit is created (from the mother energy) before this planet creation and the planet is created later (by this energy motion features) and the planet data is defined based on this motion features and the planet moves after Creation with this mother energy motion- and– in case any planet after creation changes its orbit the planet motion data be changed but its creation data is saved- we should note that the space must be created based on a geometrical design-means- the solar system space (all orbits) is designed based on one geometrical design before any planet creation

(D)

The planet is a geometrical point on the mother energy and moves with it –Or

The planet is a geometrical point on the same light beam and moves with it

That tells

The solar planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam and move with this light beam motion

By that- the planets are similar to carriages in one train –and the light beam (the mother energy) is the engine of this train- the light moves and causes all planets motions  (as the sea water moves and causes all ships motions)

Here we conclude that the planets motions are similar to the chess board motions because it depends on geometrical rules in all details- that's why the analysis is so useful because it can show the geometrical design found by the planets motions integration.

(E)

The planet definition answers the question

If The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Why This Reflection Have Effects On The Planets Data?

Because the waves reflection causes to define the energy motion direction and by that the planets data is changed and effected by the moving energy through these planets-

The effects on the planets data is very useful because it proves the reflection is a fact as we discussed later

II- The Comparison

The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system three times

(From Neptune to Saturn) This Is The First Reflection

(From Uranus to Jupiter) This Is The Second Reflection

(From Venus to Mars) This Is The Third Reflection

Here we compare among the data of these planets- the comparison provides 7 groups of data in each group we compare the planets data because I want to prove that the planets use similar behaviors to produce their data – means- this all data is created based on geometrical rules which proves that there's one reason caused to create all this data and this reason is the gravitational waves reflection- In the comparison I start by Venus reflection (the 3rd one) then Uranus reflection (the 2nd one) and Neptune reflection (1st one) because Venus is very simple data and can be understood easily-

The Data Changes

 The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in the planets data let's refer to these changes in following

What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.

What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection

The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.

The energy direction is changed by the reflection

The players of the rates of time are reflected also –

Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have discussed- the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn–  and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets - 

These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the comparison of the data and the detailed analysis for the wave reflection.

Group Data No (I)

(1)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

And

687 days x 2π        = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π        = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2  =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

(2)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That 

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The  period4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π      = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π      = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π      =  90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

(3)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–

BUT

The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And

(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm               = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm   x 4π    = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days   x 8π     = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

Discussion

(1)

The data shows the following

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference

This data proved my planet definition (the planets are geometrical points carried by the same one energy- or- the planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam- and the planets move with this light beam motion- and the planets are created depending on each other and No planet is independent from the others in its creation and motion) – means- the planets are similar to whirlpools (vortex) found on the sea water page- we can imagine many whirlpools (vortex) are found on the same one sea and they are near to each other- this picture is very similar to the planets nature- that explains how the reflection of energy for one time can define the orbital periods for three planets (or 4 planets) together-

Here we imagine there are 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and then one strong wave of water passed through these 4 whirlpools (vortex), and this water wave motion causes effects on the 4 whirlpools-

This information is so important because one motion only (one wave reflection) can cause to define three or four planets data that proves strongly the planets Can NOT be independent neither in Creation Nor in motion- the planets are created and moving depends on each other because all of them are created from the same one energy and they move with this same energy motion-

NOTICE Let's imagine we have 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and one strong water wave passes through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)  - now – suppose we put some red color on this strong water wave- what would happen? The water color will be red and the red water will pass through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)  

We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.

That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other –

Now let's analyze each reflection individually

(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)

224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)

AND-

680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –

As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)

The orbital periods definition

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2  =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We don't discuss the precession cycle here

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)

It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.

The important notice here tells that- the gravitational wave reflection for one time defines 3 planets orbital periods – this fact is proved strongly by the data and it disproves the wrong idea tells (Planet is created independently from the other planets) 

(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)

Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The  period 4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π      = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π      = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period)                    (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π      =  90560 days (Pluto orbital period)                       (error 2%)

We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The  period 4900 days  

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

The comparison shows clearly the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because

The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-

Notice - please note clearly that – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-

It's one gravitational wave sent from Pluto to Neptune and reflected to Saturn then this same wave is sent from Saturn to Uranus and Uranus reflected the same wave to Jupiter and Jupiter sent the same wave to Venus and Venus reflected the same wave to Mars- One Gravitational Wave moves through all these planets        

The Conclusion

The planets data is distributed in the reversed direction for the reflected energy- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter but the data is distributed from Jupiter to Uranus- there's a geometrical reason for this behavior we should discover later.

(3) The First Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Neptune To Saturn)

We still have another problem- let's remember this problem reason

The gravitational wave first reflection is done from Pluto to Neptune, supposing Neptune would send the energy to Uranus but Neptune didn't send the energy instead Neptune kept the energy inside its orbit and prevent it to move toward Uranus – also Uranus itself couldn't release the imprisoned energy from Neptune orbit – and that necessitated Saturn itself to create interaction with Neptune to release the imprisoned energy for that the energy is moved toward Saturn immediately by that this reflection of the wave is considered the first reflection because the energy is released from Neptune to Saturn directly – Shortly- the wave energy is sent from Pluto to Neptune and the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and this is the first reflection of the energy (the gravitational wave first reflection)

Let's see the data - The distance 1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) is still a distance And (1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm               = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm   x 4π    = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days   x 8π     = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

The data follows the rule (2π, 4π, 8π) perfectly as the other two reflections but the data shows 2 problems which are

1st problem

The data distribution is in the reversed direction of the energy motion direction- because the reflection is done from Neptune to Saturn but the data shows the orbital circumferences of (Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto) are defined by this reflection which supposes the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune and that's NOT Fact 

This behavior is typical the behavior of the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter-

Means- this behavior is repeated in the two reflections of energy which tells that the behavior depends on a geometrical reason.

2nd problem

The distance is not changed into a period of time as the other reflections but stayed as a distance! How and why?? let's see deeply this data

If the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune, Saturn orbital circumference 9010 mkm should be changed into a period of time to be 9010 days and then

9010 days    x 2π    = 2 x 28244 days (28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference)

9010 days    x 4π    = 113223 days

9010 days    x 6π    = 169840 days

We see the data gives NO real values- means- this is not the direction of the data creation- Instead – the distance 1433 mkm or the circumference 9010 mkm is still distance and then

1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm   x 4π    = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days   x 8π     = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

And

1433 mkm               = Mars orbital circumference

We understand that, the data provides a distance (1433 mkm) and not a period of time then we have to ask again why this distance is not changed into a period of time?

We understand that the outer planets have 2 reflections (first reflection from Neptune to Saturn) and (the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter)- also we understand that the solar system needs one reflection only in the outer planets and one reflection only in the inner planets and also we know the outer planets have two reflections because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system- means if Neptune is removed from the solar system the outer planets would have one reflection only – for that- the designer caused the two reflections in the outer planets to be complementary one another – the reflection from Uranus to Jupiter defines the planets orbital periods and the reflection from Neptune to Saturn defines these same planets orbital circumferences

 The designer caused to make the two reflections complementary one another and by that the two reflections can be unified into one reflection and based on that the machine will work by one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets- but how the energy motion produces the distances in place of the periods of time? this question is hard to answer because we don't see deeply how the reflection of energy can define each planet orbital period (or orbital circumference) by using the rates (2π, 4π, 6π) we just discovered the rule but more geometrical analysis is required to see how this rule works

NOTICE

In the third reflection (from Venus to Mars) – let's remember the data

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

687 days x 2π        = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π        = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2  =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We have asked- why Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate (0.8)?

Let's try to answer – let's see the data 10747 /9800 = 9800/9010 where

10747 days  = Saturn orbital period and 9010 mkm   = Saturn orbital circumference

9800 mkm   = 2 x 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)  

We know 4900 mkm and 4900 days is the player in the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter- means- Saturn has effect also in the second reflection for that the second reflection has effect on Saturn data and caused its orbital period to be produced under the effect of the rate (0.8) which is the reflection rate as we will see in the next data 

Group Data No (II)

(1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8   = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day)              = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

(2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

Discussion

We discuss the data no. (2) and (3) at first

DATA NO. (2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(0.421 mkm = Uranus motion distance in its rotation period)

DATA NO. (3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

(0.3129 mkm = Neptune motion distance in its rotation period)

MORE DATA

0.5875 mkm (Uranus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.46688 mkm

(0.466884 mkm = Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Neptune motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3736 mkm

(0.3736 mkm = Saturn motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Pluto motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3248 mkm

(i)

The rate (0.8) is created by the waves reflection and the planets velocities are defined based on each other by this rate as discussed in the planet velocity definition-  here the data shows the rate (0.8) defines each planet motion distance based on the other planet motion distance (in the same one reflection) –

let's explain that in more details

(1st reflection From Neptune to Saturn) for that

Saturn motion distance per solar day (0.838 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Neptune motion distance in its rotation period 0.3129 million km

Also

Neptune motion distance per solar day (0.46688 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 million km

AND

(2nd reflection From Uranus to Jupiter) for that

Jupiter motion distance per solar day (1.1318 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Uranus motion distance in its rotation period 0.421 million km

Also

Uranus motion distance per solar day (0.5875 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period 0.46688 million km

AND

In the 3rd reflection we will see Mars motion distance per solar day is defined by Venus motion distance per solar day- follows the same rule  

Notice

We note the data No. (2) and (3) show the data is distributed in the reversed direction for the energy motion because the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and from Uranus to Jupiter- But data is distributed in the reversed direction-

In the third reflection we will see the data moves in the same direction with the energy distribution

Also  

In Venus data we will see that it uses the square value (0.8)^2 and we will explain why the rate is used in square value

(ii)

Why is the rate (1.0725) found in the data? because the gravitational wave  moves by speed of light (300000 km/s) in Saturn orbit and in all planets orbits till Venus orbit-

Shortly

the wave velocity was 205.8 km/s through Pluto, Neptune and Uranus orbits BUT

The wave velocity is accelerated in Saturn orbit and its velocity be = speed of light =300000 km/s, for that reason the rate (1.0725) is created because this is (Lorentz length contraction effect rate) and it can be produced only by motion with speed=(99% speed of light =297000 km/s)- shortly- the wave velocity be equal=speed of light = 300000 km/s in Saturn orbit, for that the rate (1.0725) is produced in the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter as the data shows (and also in Venus data we will see it)

(iii)

The previous data shows the planets distances are rated by the rate (0.8) for the planets players in the same wave reflection- but- this picture is not complete yet – because the planets which aren't players in the same reflection shows equal distances also but this distances equality doesn't depend on the rate (0.8) let's give examples

Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period = Neptune motion distance per solar day =0.466884 million km

And

Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 mkm x π = Uranus motion distance per solar day 0.5875 mkm x 2

And

The Earth motion distance per solar day = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period = 2.574 million km

This distances equality must be produced also by the waves reflection but the rule is not clear yet- I want to say the effect of the rate (0.8) on the planets distances is part of greater rule explains how this distances equality is produced and the useful result of it –

Please note–I analyze this data in details in 2nd part of this 1st hypothesis explanation-

Now

Let's discuss the data No.(1)

DATA NO. (1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (The Earth motion distance per solar day)                  = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day= Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

Means

3.024 million km x (0.8)^2 x 1.0725 = 2.082 million km where

3.024 mkm  =Venus motion distance per solar day

2.082 mkm  =Mars motion distance per solar day

Notice

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day

2.57 mkm = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm The moon motion distance per solar day

2.59 mkm = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

The data tells Mars motion distance per solar day depends on Venus motion distance per solar day – here all distances are defined by the solar day- 

In the third reflection- the wave is reflected from Venus to Mars- here also Venus motion distance per solar day (3.024 mkm) defines Mars motion distance per solar day (2.082 mkm)- but the definition depends on the squared value (0.8)^2 

That shows Venus reflection follows the same rule used by the other reflections – where the sender planet motion distance per solar day defines the receiver planet motion distance

Perfectly the rule is followed BUT Why does Venus use the square value (0.8)^2??

Because of the reflections order – let's explain that

The two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and by that they are unified and can be considered as One Unified Reflection in the outer planets

Means- there is one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets and these are two reflections- means – Venus reflection should be considered the second reflection that causes to square the value (0.8)- that explains why Venus uses the squared Value (0.8)^2

Notice

This is a proof for my theory that (one gravitational wave is reflected three times)- means- this wave is reflected before and effected by the rate (0.8) and this same wave is reflected again for that the rate (0.8) be in its squared value  (0.8)^2

The Conclusion

The gravitational waves reflection causes the sender planet motion distance to define the receiver planet motion distance as seen in the data- the definition depends on the rate (0.8) – here we see one rule proves the receiver planet motion depends on the sender planet motion- 

Group Data No (III)

(1)              

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

(2)              

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6

(3)              

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

And

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

Discussion

Data No. (1)

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

568 x 10^24 kg      = Saturn Mass

102 x 10^24 kg      = Neptune Mass

59800 days            = Neptune orbital period

10747 days            = Saturn orbital period

In the first reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Neptune to Saturn

This behavior shows second rule– for the planets in the same reflection- we see the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate and this behavior is used by the other two reflections- means- the gravitational wave reflection between two planets cause these two planets masses rate to define their orbital periods rate – let's see the rest data

Data No. (2)

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6                   (notice1407.6π =4331 error 2%)

1898 x 10^24 kg    = Jupiter Mass

86.8 x 10^24 kg     = Uranus Mass

30589 days            = Uranus orbital period

4331 days              = Jupiter orbital period

In second reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter

It's the same rule and behavior, the planets masses rates defines their orbital periods

Just Jupiter orbital period 4331 is divided by (π) – no any other change in the rule proves that the rule is a fact and used with the planets of the same reflection

Data No. (3)

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

4.87 x 10^24 kg     = Venus Mass                          and 0.642 x 10^24 kg= Mars Mass

224.7 days             = Venus orbital period              and 687 days= Mars orbital period

In the third reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Venus to Mars

Here also we see the planets use the same rule and the same behavior – the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate-But the rate is squared! Why?   

Venus Mass = 7.6 Mars Mass but the data uses the squared rate (7.6)^2 –

We should pay attention for this rate because the other planets used their masses rate but NOT squared value – Why does Venus use the squared value (7.6)^2?

We have solved this question in the distances discussion when Venus used (0.8)^2 and the other planets use (0.8) only- here also is similar to that- let's remember the reason

We agreed that the two wave reflections in the outer planets are complementary one another and by that they are unified together into one unified reflection and by that the outer planets has one unified reflection and the inner planets has one single reflection and these are considered as two reflections and for that Venus reflection is considered the second one in the solar system (and the final one) for that Venus uses the squared Value – where we know the wave reflection causes to square the value

Notice - 5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747) = (10/1.8) =9010/1622 where 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination and 10 =4 x 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) and -9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference and 1622 mkm = Neptune Uranus Distance

Notice π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%) – this data is discussed in the next point

The Conclusion The Wave Reflection Causes The Sender And Receiver Planets Masses Rate To Define Their Orbital Periods Rate.

Group Data No (IV)

(1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

(2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 =5.56/2

(3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Discussion

Notice

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

This data shows the rates (5.56) and (7.6) are found based on the value (π^3=31) I try to prove that it's one energy (one value π^3=31) and the different rates as (5.56 and 7.6) are found depending on (this one value π^3=31) by geometrical reasons – that proves it's one energy (one wave) is reflected three times in the solar system – the value (π^3 = 31 =) is very important because all rates depend on it

The group data shows the planets diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 =31)- let's examine it in following

Data No. (1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination

1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination

The data shows the two planets diameters are rated with rate equal their orbital inclination and this rate equal π^0.5

Notice

177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) x 93.4

90+ 3.4 = 93.4 deg

Data No. (2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 = 5.56

We remember 31 = (5.56)^2

Data No. (3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Also we remember 31/4 = 7.75 (and the difference between 7.75 and 7.6 is 2%)

The data shows the diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 = 31 =) as the masses do

Means- the planets masses and diameters are created rated to one another based on this same value (π^3 = 31 =)

I try to prove that – one energy is found behind all this data- the value (π^3 = 31 =) refers to one energy and this energy is effected by different geometrical reasons and that causes this energy (π^3 = 31 =) to show different rates as (5.56) and (7.6)

Shortly – we deal with one energy reflected three times in the solar system and the planets data are defined by the effect of this energy on them

Please note- we can imagine one river of water moves through different cities and each city deals with the river based on its own data- one city has great soil and this uses the river water to plant vegetables and fruits- another city its ground has many holes and caves the river water will cause all these holes to be filled of water and that will create many moors in this city and that will not be useful for it –

We have here the same picture-

One energy moves through the solar system and reflected three times in it and this reflection causes changes for the planets data for that the different rates (5.56 and 7.6) are created from this one energy (π^3 = 31 =) by geometrical reasons have effects on it.

Group Data No (V)

(1)               243 mkm     = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days

(2)               17.2 km       = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds

(3)               16.1 km       = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds

Discussion

We discuss data No. (2) and (3) at first

Data No. (2)

17.2 km      = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds

13.1 km /s    = Jupiter velocity

1.13129       = (5.25/4) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56

17.2 hours   = Uranus rotation period

Data No. (3)

16.1 km      = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds

9.7 km /s     = Saturn velocity

1.65             = (5.25/π) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56

16.1 hours   = Neptune rotation period

The data shows each planet rotation period depends on the other planet velocity based on the rate (5.56) where (31=5.56^2)- that shows Uranus rotation period is connected with Jupiter velocity and Neptune rotation period is connected with Saturn velocity proves that a deep connection is found between each two planets as a result for the wave reflection between them 

Data No. (1)

243 mkm     = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days

243 days      = Venus rotation period

2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day  and 116.75 days = Venus day period 

We see also here – Venus rotation period is related to Mars velocity- and this similar to the other planets behavior as we have discussed before 

Notice

Venus (35 km/s) moves in 10747 seconds a distance = 378675 km

Where

378675 km = Saturn circumference

10747 days = Saturn orbital period 

We know that- No direct reflection is found between Venus and Saturn- but the data shows deep interaction is found between them

I want to say

I provide different data to prove my hypothesis tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and the waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity) for that I put different data trying to prove this hypothesis

But- the real design is much complex than this small hypothesis- because this hypothesis refers to one rule found in the design but the design is consisted of hundreds of rules and by that I provide very narrow vision for the whole truth-

Imagine we examine the artery connected between the human liver and his heart- it's one artery – it's fact and real piece of the human body but it's just one artery of many others- I want to say- the real vision of the solar system is so wide than this one I provide here- that's why the rules are not complete- but I provide strong data can prove my hypothesis and can show a piece of truth about the solar system real design.     

Group Data No (VI)

(1)              

177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2

(2)

97.8 degrees   = 31 x 3.1 degrees

(3)

28.3 degrees (Neptune axial tilt) =  26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) x 1.0725

Discussion

Data No. (1)

177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2

177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt

 25.2 degrees   = Mars Axial Tilt                   BUT 25.2 +90 = 115.2 degrees

Please note

(12104 km Venus diameter / 6792 km Mars diameter) = 3.4/1.9 = π^0.5

(3.4 deg and 1.9 deg are the orbital inclinations of Venus and Mars respectively)

And

(177.4 deg Venus axial tilt / 115.2 degrees) = π/2

We see clearly the data depend on the value (π^3) and different geometrical reasons have effect on this value to produce these rates (π^0.5 and π/2)

Data No. (2)

97.8 degrees   = 31 x 3.1 degrees

97.8 degrees   = Venus Axial Tilt

3.1 degrees     = Mars Axial Tilt

The data still depends on this same value (π^3= 31)

Group Data No (VII)

The distance 1433 million km

This distance should prove the energy is transported and the waves are reflected in the solar system because this distance is used frequently in the solar system and no explanation for such using better than the reflection of energy – let’s see its data

1433 million km               = Mars Orbital Circumference

1433 million km               = Saturn Orbital Distance

1433 million km               = Uranus Saturn Distance

2 x 1433 million km         = Uranus Orbital Distance

π x 1433 million km         = Neptune Orbital Distance

(π+1) x 1433 million km   = Pluto Orbital Distance

1410 million km               = Pluto Neptune Distance  (with 1433 mkm error 1.7%)

Also

1433 days =  2π x 224.7 days (Venus Orbital Period)

Logically there's a geometrical reason to cause all these distances to be equal and rated to each other based on this same root (1433)- and the wave reflection can be this geometrical reason by which this data is created.  

III- The Explanation Of The Wave Reflection Effect On The Solar System Design

The gravitational waves reflection has great effect on the solar system design- let's refer to this effect in following

The Planets Distribution

The three outer planets (Pluto- Neptune- Uranus) have great orbits- why?

Because the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s in these orbits and the planets motions energies are stored in these orbits as waves move by this velocity 205.8 km/s – means – great and massive motion energy is stored in these orbit where the waves move by 205.8 km/s that needed great areas to store so massive amount of energy

BUT

The Waves Velocity Is Accelerated In Saturn Orbit 

This is the important point- because- the interaction between the outer planets caused to reflect the wave in Saturn orbit firstly and this reflection causes to square the velocity and then the velocity is squared and be equal the speed of light – means- the gravitational waves move by speed of light starting from Saturn orbit and continues with this speed till Venus and the other inner planets-

This is very important picture because

The low velocity 205.8 km/s needed great areas that causes the orbits or Pluto, Neptune and Uranus to be so great areas – BUT

The high speed motion (speed of light) doesn't need great areas – that's why the planets orbits from Saturn to Mercury are small orbits and the inner has very small orbits because the energy doesn't depend on the number of waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s but the energy depends on the motion be speed of light by that the energy of 1461 waves move by 205.8 km/s be equal the energy of one wave moves by speed of light – that causes the orbits to be small orbits – and that explains the distribution of the planets from the sun to Pluto.    

And for that

When the massive reflected energy reached to Venus- it doesn't destroy the small inner planets and their orbits because the energy is used immediately to produce the sun rays means no need for storing the energy and for that no places for the energy storing instead the energy is used immediately- I try to show that- the planets distribution depends on the gravitational waves velocity in different orbits and by that the planets create their orbits in harmony with the moving energy    

The Planets Masses Distribution

The outer planets have great masses but the inner planets have very small masses- why? because the difference in masses enable to accelerate the wave velocity in Saturn orbit-this idea is explained clearly in (Mass definition) in my paper definitions

The mass is used as a rate of time and the rates between the great and small masses aim to create the required rates of time and by these rates of time the wave velocity is accelerated- let's explain that in following

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  

Curriculum Vitae       https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                   mrwaheid1@yahoo.com gergesgerges@yandex.ru                   

ORCID                 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook              https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                        https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                  https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 

Researcherid         https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                    https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal             https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                             https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                       https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia              https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publicationshttp://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare                 https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[bocadosdefilosofia]

«Pero aunque los animales extraen gran parte de sus conocimientos de la observación, también hay una buena porción de ellos, de los que la naturaleza les ha dotado desde sus orígenes, que exceden en mucho la capacidad que manifiestan ordinariamente, y con respecto a los que mejoran en poco o en nada a causa de la más dilatada experiencia y práctica. A éstos llamamos instintos, y tendemos a admirarlos como algo muy extraordinario e inexplicable por las disquisiciones del entendimiento humano. Pero quizá cese o disminuya nuestro asombro cuando tengamos en cuenta que el mismo razonamiento experimental, que poseemos en común con las bestias y del cual depende toda la conducción de nuestra vida, no es sino una especie de instinto o fuerza mecánica que actúa, en nosotros sin que la conozcamos, y que en sus operaciones principales no es dirigido por ninguna relación o comparación de ideas, como lo son los objetos propios de nuestras facultades intelectuales. Aunque se trate de un instinto diferente, de todas formas, es un instinto lo que enseña al hombre a evitar el fuego, tanto como lo es el que enseña a un pájaro con tanta precisión el arte de incubar y toda la estructura y orden de su nido.»

David Hume: Investigación sobre el entendimiento humano. Alianza Editorial, pág. 132.Madrid, 1980.

TGO

@bocadosdefilosofia

@dias-de-la-ira-1

[rafaelangelbecerramarquez]

¿Qué es la Psicología?

La psicología es la ciencia que estudia los procesos mentales y el comportamiento humano. Desde hace siglos, el ser humano ha sentido una profunda curiosidad por entender cómo funciona la mente y por qué reaccionamos de ciertas maneras en diversas situaciones. Esta disciplina científica busca comprender las razones detrás de nuestras emociones, pensamientos y comportamientos, y cómo estos influyen en nuestra interacción con el mundo que nos rodea. Según Butler (2017), la psicología como disciplina integra conocimientos fundamentales que han moldeado su evolución, ayudándonos a entender mejor cómo influye el comportamiento en nuestra vida diaria. Más allá de su rol en la comprensión de la mente humana, la psicología también se orienta a ayudar a las personas a enfrentar sus dificultades, mejorando su bienestar y su calidad de vida.

Esta ciencia social explora los múltiples factores que afectan nuestra vida mental y emocional, desde las funciones biológicas del cerebro hasta el impacto de nuestras experiencias de vida. Al estudiar la psicología, se analizan estos aspectos desde diferentes perspectivas teóricas, lo cual permite una comprensión integral del ser humano. Esta disciplina no solo busca el conocimiento, sino que también se enfoca en el desarrollo de herramientas prácticas que mejoren el bienestar individual y colectivo.

Historia y Evolución de la Psicología

La psicología tiene sus primeras raíces en la filosofía y la medicina de la Antigua Grecia, cuando filósofos como Platón y Aristóteles comenzaron a indagar en temas como el funcionamiento de la mente y la relación entre el cuerpo y el alma. A lo largo de los siglos, estas reflexiones filosóficas establecieron las bases para una comprensión primitiva de la mente humana. Sin embargo, no fue hasta el siglo XIX, en el contexto de la Revolución Industrial y el auge de las ciencias naturales, que la psicología comenzó a consolidarse como una disciplina científica independiente.

En 1879, el fisiólogo alemán Wilhelm Wundt fundó el primer laboratorio de psicología experimental en Leipzig, Alemania, marcando un hito que muchos consideran el nacimiento formal de la psicología como ciencia empírica. Morris y Maisto (2005) destacan que este fue un momento crucial para la psicología, ya que permitió que se establecieran métodos científicos para estudiar la mente humana de manera rigurosa. Wundt propuso que la psicología debía estudiar la experiencia consciente mediante métodos experimentales, y su enfoque impulsó el uso del método científico en el estudio de la mente. De acuerdo con Vargas (2006), el enfoque experimental de Wundt impulsó la separación de la psicología de la filosofía, consolidándola como una disciplina científica. Poco después, surgieron diferentes corrientes de pensamiento que fueron modelando el campo de la psicología moderna.

El psicoanálisis, desarrollado por Sigmund Freud a inicios del siglo XX, introdujo la idea de que gran parte del comportamiento humano está influido por el inconsciente, explorando conceptos como los sueños y la sexualidad. Más adelante, el conductismo, liderado por John B. Watson y B.F. Skinner, propuso que el comportamiento humano debía estudiarse únicamente a través de observaciones objetivas, enfocándose en estímulos y respuestas. A partir de los años 1950, el enfoque humanista, con figuras como Carl Rogers y Abraham Maslow, puso el énfasis en el potencial de crecimiento y la autorrealización de las personas, destacando la importancia de la empatía y la relación terapéutica.

Ya por último, la psicología cognitiva, que se desarrolló con fuerza en la segunda mitad del siglo XX, se centró en estudiar procesos mentales internos como la percepción, la memoria y el razonamiento. Con la aparición de la neurociencia y la tecnología, la psicología ha seguido evolucionando, abarcando una comprensión cada vez más profunda y compleja de la mente humana en diferentes contextos y situaciones.

Principales Áreas de Estudio en Psicología

Dentro de la psicología existen diversas ramas que se especializan en diferentes aspectos del comportamiento y la mente humana. Una de las ramas fundamentales es la psicología clínica, que se centra en la evaluación, diagnóstico y tratamiento de trastornos mentales y emocionales. Los psicólogos clínicos trabajan con pacientes que presentan desde ansiedad y depresión hasta trastornos complejos como la esquizofrenia, brindando apoyo y ayudándoles a manejar sus problemas de salud mental. En este campo, existen técnicas de intervención como la terapia cognitivo-conductual, la terapia humanista y el psicoanálisis.

Otra área importante es la psicología social, que investiga cómo influimos y somos influenciados por las personas y la sociedad. Esta rama estudia conceptos como la conformidad, la persuasión, el prejuicio, y la dinámica de los grupos. La psicología social ayuda a entender fenómenos colectivos, como la cultura, los roles de género y la estructura de la sociedad, y permite analizar el impacto de las interacciones sociales en el comportamiento individual.

La psicología del desarrollo examina los cambios en el comportamiento y los procesos mentales a lo largo de la vida, desde la niñez y la adolescencia hasta la adultez y la vejez, observando el crecimiento cognitivo, emocional y social en cada etapa. Esta rama es esencial para comprender cómo evolucionamos como personas, tanto a nivel físico como emocional, y proporciona una base para apoyar el desarrollo sano en niños y jóvenes.

Además, la neuropsicología se centra en la relación entre el cerebro y el comportamiento, explorando temas como la memoria, la percepción y el lenguaje, y cómo las alteraciones en el sistema nervioso afectan estas funciones. Esta rama es fundamental para comprender los efectos de condiciones como los accidentes cerebrovasculares o las enfermedades neurodegenerativas y para el desarrollo de intervenciones en el campo de la rehabilitación cognitiva.

Viktor Frankl y la Logoterapia: El Sentido de la Vida

Entre los enfoques terapéuticos desarrollados en el siglo XX destaca la logoterapia, creada por el psiquiatra austríaco Viktor Frankl. Frankl (2015), quien sobrevivió a los horrores de los campos de concentración nazis, desarrolló esta terapia centrada en la búsqueda de sentido como una de las motivaciones más profundas del ser humano. La logoterapia parte de la premisa de que el ser humano puede enfrentar cualquier sufrimiento si encuentra un propósito o un sentido que lo trascienda. Esta idea fue plasmada en su famoso libro El hombre en busca de sentido, donde Frankl describe cómo los prisioneros que lograban hallar un propósito personal tenían mayores posibilidades de sobrevivir.

La logoterapia se enfoca en ayudar a las personas a encontrar un sentido en la vida, incluso en situaciones de sufrimiento. Para Frankl, este sentido puede encontrarse en tres dimensiones: a través de la creación o el trabajo, a través de la experiencia y el amor, o a través de la actitud frente al sufrimiento inevitable. Esta terapia ha demostrado ser útil para ayudar a personas que atraviesan crisis existenciales, depresión y duelo. La logoterapia propone que el sentido de la vida es único para cada persona y se puede descubrir mediante la introspección y el autoconocimiento.

Frankl aportó una perspectiva única al campo de la psicología al centrar su enfoque en la dimensión existencial del ser humano, y al hacerlo, abrió un camino dentro de la psicología humanista. Su enfoque también demuestra la capacidad humana de resiliencia, la cual ha sido objeto de estudios posteriores en la psicología positiva.

Aplicaciones de la Psicología

La psicología tiene amplias aplicaciones prácticas en diversos aspectos de la vida humana, desde la salud mental hasta la educación, el ámbito laboral y el deporte. La psicología clínica, en particular, desempeña un papel crucial en la salud mental, abordando el diagnóstico, la prevención y el tratamiento de trastornos emocionales y psicológicos. Los psicólogos clínicos utilizan enfoques como la terapia cognitivo-conductual, el psicoanálisis y la logoterapia para ayudar a las personas a comprender y manejar sus pensamientos y emociones, y, en consecuencia, mejorar su bienestar y calidad de vida. Estos especialistas trabajan tanto con trastornos comunes, como la ansiedad y la depresión, como con condiciones más complejas, como la esquizofrenia, ofreciendo apoyo a través de intervenciones terapéuticas y herramientas adaptadas a cada caso.

En el ámbito educativo, la psicología facilita el desarrollo de métodos de enseñanza centrados en las necesidades individuales de los estudiantes, optimizando su aprendizaje y motivación. La psicología educativa se enfoca en analizar cómo los estudiantes procesan la información y buscan estrategias para promover un ambiente de aprendizaje positivo y eficaz, beneficiando tanto a estudiantes como a docentes.

Por otro lado, la psicología organizacional se ocupa de mejorar la productividad y el ambiente laboral. Los psicólogos en este campo estudian la motivación, la satisfacción laboral y la dinámica de grupo, ayudando a las organizaciones a implementar políticas que promuevan tanto el bienestar de los empleados como la eficiencia general.

La psicología deportiva, a su vez, ayuda a los atletas a optimizar su rendimiento, manteniendo un enfoque en la gestión de la presión, el control emocional y el establecimiento de objetivos. Este campo es fundamental para apoyar el desarrollo de habilidades psicológicas en el deporte y para potenciar la resiliencia y concentración de los atletas en situaciones de alta competencia.

En la contemporaneidad, el conocimiento psicológico aplicado en áreas como el marketing y la política contribuye a entender mejor el comportamiento humano, permitiendo desarrollar estrategias efectivas que impacten positivamente en la vida social. La psicología no solo nos permite comprendernos mejor a nosotros mismos, sino que también ofrece herramientas para construir un bienestar colectivo.

Importancia de la Psicología en la Sociedad

La psicología desempeña un papel fundamental en el desarrollo humano, ya que ofrece herramientas para comprender y mejorar nuestras relaciones, emociones y capacidad de adaptación. En una sociedad cada vez más compleja y desafiante, esta disciplina nos ayuda a entender por qué actuamos de cierta manera y cómo podemos manejar nuestras reacciones ante diversas situaciones. La psicología proporciona enfoques terapéuticos como la logoterapia de Viktor Frankl, que nos orientan a encontrar propósito y sentido incluso en los momentos más difíciles, promoviendo así el bienestar emocional y la resiliencia.

Además, la psicología contribuye de forma activa a la creación de políticas públicas que buscan mejorar la calidad de vida en la sociedad. Al aplicar principios psicológicos en la formulación de estas políticas, es posible promover una mayor empatía, justicia y bienestar social. La psicología permite comprender mejor las necesidades y motivaciones humanas, lo cual es esencial para construir comunidades más inclusivas y solidarias.

Esta ciencia dinámica no solo estudia la mente y el comportamiento humano desde diferentes enfoques, sino que también aborda cuestiones existenciales, como el propósito de la vida y el desarrollo personal. Desde los aportes de Frankl hasta las innovaciones actuales, la psicología continúa evolucionando, expandiendo sus horizontes y demostrando su importancia en diversos ámbitos de la vida cotidiana. La psicología no solo enriquece nuestra comprensión de nosotros mismos, sino que también ofrece herramientas prácticas para mejorar el bienestar individual y colectivo, subrayando así su relevancia en el contexto social actual.

Referencias Bibliográficas

Butler, T. (2017). 50 clásicos de la psicología. Málaga: Editorial Sirio

Frank, Viktor (2015). El hombre en busca de sentido. Barcelona: Herder Editorial

Morris, C. y Maisto, A. (2005). Introducción a la Psicología. Naucalpan de Juárez: Pearson Educación de México, S.A. [Documento en línea] Disponible: https://clea.edu.mx/biblioteca/files/original/cee130d0096d3a677d25a54ec1ea614c.pdf [Consulta: 2024, noviembre 12]

Vargas, J. (2006). Brevísima historia de la psicología. Ciudad de México: Revista electrónica de psicología Iztacala. [Artículo en línea] Disponible: https://www.iztacala.unam.mx/carreras/psicologia/psiclin/vol9num3/art7vol9no3.pdf  [Consulta: 2024, noviembre 12]

[descubredonostia]

Top Ten Restaurantes de San Sebastián: Alta Cocina y Pintxos Imperdibles

San Sebastián es un auténtico paraíso gastronómico, y cuando hablamos de los 'top ten restaurantes de San Sebastián', no solo nos referimos a la calidad excepcional, sino también a la variedad que ofrece la ciudad. Aquí combinamos restaurantes de alta cocina con estrellas Michelin y bares de pintxos icónicos que reflejan la esencia de la gastronomía vasca.

Arzak

Con tres estrellas Michelin, Arzak es la cuna de la cocina moderna vasca, dirigida por Juan Mari Arzak y su hija, Elena Arzak. Este restaurante ha marcado el desarrollo de la alta cocina en España, siendo pionero en fusionar la tradición vasca con técnicas innovadoras. Su ambiente elegante y su enfoque creativo hacen de cada comida una experiencia que desafía los sentidos. Platos destacados: El menú degustación cambia con frecuencia para aprovechar los productos de temporada. Entre sus platos más icónicos están el huevo con caviar blanco, que explora la delicadeza de sabores y texturas, y el rape con aceitunas verdes, una combinación única de sabores que realza lo mejor del mar Cantábrico. Cada plato está diseñado para sorprender y deleitar a los comensales. Ambiente y servicio: El servicio es impecable, con personal atento y bien formado, capaz de explicar cada plato y su inspiración en detalle. La decoración es elegante y moderna, adecuada para una experiencia gourmet de primer nivel. Pros: La experiencia gastronómica es inolvidable, con atención al detalle en cada aspecto, desde el maridaje de vinos hasta el servicio. Además, el restaurante mantiene una atmósfera accesible, permitiendo a los comensales interactuar con los chefs en ocasiones. Contras: El precio es elevado (menú degustación desde 240 €), y aunque vale cada euro para los amantes de la alta cocina, puede no ser accesible para todos los presupuestos. Reservar con anticipación es esencial, dado que es uno de los lugares más solicitados.

Akelarre

El restaurante Akelarre, liderado por el chef Pedro Subijana, es un icono de la gastronomía vasca, con una ubicación excepcional en una colina que ofrece vistas inigualables al mar Cantábrico. Con sus tres estrellas Michelin, este restaurante representa el equilibrio entre la innovación culinaria y el respeto por la tradición, utilizando ingredientes locales de alta calidad y técnicas refinadas. Platos destacados: Los menús degustación de Akelarre incluyen platos como el cordero de leche con trigo, una obra de arte que combina sabores profundos y complejos, y el huevo en tempura, que se destaca por su ligereza y precisión. Subijana juega con la presentación y el sabor en cada plato, haciendo que cada bocado sea memorable. Ambiente y servicio: La ubicación del restaurante y sus vistas al océano crean un ambiente especial. El servicio es cálido y profesional, y el equipo se esfuerza en hacer que cada comensal se sienta como en casa. Akelarre también cuenta con un lujoso hotel boutique para quienes deseen prolongar la experiencia. Pros: La atmósfera relajada y las vistas son incomparables, mientras que la cocina de Subijana es conocida por su creatividad. La opción de quedarse en su hotel boutique es ideal para quienes buscan una escapada completa. Contras: Está alejado del centro de San Sebastián y los precios son elevados (menús entre 245 € y 270 €). Aunque la experiencia es inolvidable, es importante tener en cuenta el desplazamiento y la necesidad de reservar con antelación.

Mugaritz

Mugaritz es el restaurante ideal para quienes buscan una experiencia culinaria audaz y experimental. Dirigido por Andoni Luis Aduriz, este restaurante de dos estrellas Michelin está en un entorno rural a las afueras de San Sebastián, en el que la innovación y el riesgo en la cocina son la norma. La filosofía de Mugaritz se centra en la comida como arte y en desafiar las convenciones gastronómicas. Platos destacados: El menú degustación es sorpresa y se adapta a los ingredientes de temporada. Algunos platos recientes incluyen texturas de seta y tierra comestible y tuétano asado con esencia de mar, creaciones que buscan retar al comensal tanto en sabor como en textura. Ambiente y servicio: El restaurante tiene un ambiente minimalista y sereno que complementa su enfoque en la comida. El personal es muy atento y explica el concepto de cada plato para ayudar a los comensales a comprender la filosofía detrás de la experiencia. Pros: Perfecto para aventureros gastronómicos, es una experiencia sensorial única que juega con la percepción, el sabor y la estética de cada plato. El menú es variado, intrigante y constantemente cambiante. Contras: Puede ser demasiado experimental para algunos, ya que algunos platos son abstractos o rompen con lo convencional. El precio es alto (253 €), y su estilo es arriesgado para quienes buscan platos más convencionales.

La Viña

La Viña es uno de los bares de pintxos más clásicos de San Sebastián, famoso internacionalmente por su emblemática tarta de queso, de textura suave y sabor inigualable. Este lugar, acogedor y modesto, se ha convertido en una parada obligada para locales y visitantes. Platos destacados: La tarta de queso es sin duda la estrella de la carta, pero también encontrarás otros pintxos de excelente calidad, como las croquetas y el bacalao a la plancha. Aunque la oferta es limitada, cada pintxo está cuidadosamente preparado. Ambiente y servicio: El ambiente es muy acogedor y auténtico, ofreciendo una experiencia vasca tradicional. El servicio es rápido y eficiente, aunque en horas punta puede ser complicado encontrar un sitio libre. Pros: Es un lugar ideal para una experiencia culinaria auténtica sin romper el presupuesto, con pintxos desde 2 €. Su ambiente informal y la calidad de sus productos lo convierten en un sitio ideal para cualquier momento del día. Contras: La espera suele ser larga, especialmente para probar la tarta de queso, y la variedad de pintxos es limitada.

Rekondo

Rekondo es sinónimo de tradición y calidad, con una de las bodegas más prestigiosas del mundo. Este restaurante combina una cocina vasca clásica y una impresionante selección de vinos, haciendo de cada comida una experiencia completa. La decoración y el ambiente de Rekondo evocan el estilo vasco auténtico, con un toque rústico y acogedor. Platos destacados: Entre los platos más recomendados están la merluza a la koskera, una receta vasca tradicional, y el txangurro (centollo), que destaca por su frescura y sabor. Ambiente y servicio: Con vistas a San Sebastián desde su ubicación en el monte Igeldo, el restaurante ofrece un ambiente cálido y elegante, ideal para una comida tranquila. El servicio es atento y profesional, con un conocimiento profundo sobre los vinos. Pros: La bodega es impresionante y cuenta con vinos de todo el mundo, perfecta para los amantes de la enología. La cocina es consistente y de gran calidad, respetando la tradición culinaria vasca. Contras: Su decoración puede parecer anticuada para algunos, pero esta estética es parte de su encanto. Los precios son algo elevados (platos principales desde 30 €).

Kokotxa

Situado en el casco antiguo, Kokotxa es un restaurante con una estrella Michelin que combina la cocina vasca moderna con técnicas innovadoras. Dirigido por el chef Dani López, Kokotxa es conocido por su interpretación fresca y moderna de la gastronomía local. Platos destacados: Entre sus platos de pescado destacan la kokotxa de merluza con pil pil de algas, que es un homenaje a los sabores del mar, y el torrija de pan caramelizado, un postre delicioso y elaborado. Ambiente y servicio: El ambiente es íntimo y acogedor, con una decoración minimalista que permite que la comida sea el centro de atención. El servicio es atento y está dispuesto a ayudar a los comensales a descubrir nuevos sabores. Pros: Es una excelente opción Michelin en cuanto a relación calidad-precio, con un ambiente relajado y personal. La creatividad en cada plato es destacable, sin perder la esencia de la cocina vasca. Contras: Su espacio es reducido, lo cual limita la privacidad y puede hacer que el restaurante se sienta abarrotado.

Ganbara

Uno de los bares de pintxos más reconocidos de San Sebastián, Ganbara es famoso por la calidad y frescura de sus ingredientes. Los productos de temporada se convierten en pintxos excepcionales, creando un menú variado y sabroso. Platos destacados: Las setas con yema de huevo y los pintxos de marisco son imperdibles. Ganbara es un paraíso para los amantes de los productos de temporada, especialmente durante la temporada de setas y mariscos. Ambiente y servicio: Es un bar tradicional con una atmósfera bulliciosa y auténtica. La barra está siempre llena de pintxos frescos y coloridos, y el personal trabaja rápido para atender a los clientes en la concurrida barra. Pros: La calidad y frescura de los ingredientes hacen de cada pintxo una experiencia. El ambiente animado es ideal para quienes buscan una experiencia vasca auténtica. Contras: Está casi siempre abarrotado y puede ser difícil encontrar un lugar para sentarse, especialmente en temporada alta.

Bar Nestor

Conocido por su famosa tortilla de patatas y su chuletón, Bar Nestor es un pequeño y rústico bar de pintxos con una oferta limitada pero de calidad excepcional. Es ideal para quienes buscan sabores contundentes y auténticos en un ambiente casual. Ambiente y servicio: El espacio es pequeño y acogedor, lo que genera un ambiente informal y bullicioso. El personal es amable y trabaja a gran velocidad para atender a la gran cantidad de clientes. Pros: La tortilla y el chuletón son auténticas joyas gastronómicas. Es perfecto para quienes buscan algo único en San Sebastián. Contras: La espera puede ser larga, y el espacio es limitado, por lo que puede ser difícil conseguir sitio.

La Cuchara de San Telmo

Un favorito entre locales y turistas, La Cuchara de San Telmo ofrece pintxos modernos con un toque creativo. La calidad de sus ingredientes y las técnicas innovadoras de sus platos han hecho de este lugar un imprescindible en la escena de pintxos. Platos destacados: Las carrilleras de ternera y el foie a la plancha destacan por su sabor profundo y su presentación cuidada, combinando lo mejor de la tradición y la innovación vasca. Ambiente y servicio: El local es pequeño y siempre está lleno de comensales disfrutando de pintxos. El servicio es rápido y eficiente, adecuado para el ajetreo de la barra. Pros: Pintxos modernos y bien elaborados, perfectos para quienes buscan creatividad y sabores intensos en cada bocado. Contras: El espacio reducido hace que se llene rápidamente, y el ambiente puede volverse ruidoso.

Muka

Muka, en el Teatro Kursaal, ofrece una experiencia gastronómica moderna basada en la cocina a la parrilla. Su menú de temporada utiliza productos frescos y locales, llevados a su máxima expresión en la brasa, en un entorno espacioso y con vistas al mar. Platos destacados: El bacalao a la brasa y los pimientos del piquillo asados en casa son algunos de los platos más destacados, donde el sabor de la parrilla realza los ingredientes. Ambiente y servicio: El restaurante tiene una atmósfera moderna y relajada con vistas espectaculares al océano. El servicio es atento y profesional, y el espacio permite una comida tranquila. Pros: Ubicación moderna, vista al mar y excelente relación calidad-precio. Muka es ideal para quienes buscan una comida vasca de calidad en un ambiente sofisticado. Contras: Los precios pueden ser algo elevados, especialmente para una oferta de parrilla, pero el entorno y el servicio justifican la experiencia.

Fuentes Consultadas para el artículo Top Ten Restaurantes de San Sebastián

Para elaborar este ranking se han consultado recursos especializados, entre ellos: Guía Michelin, The World’s 50 Best Restaurants, Tripadvisor, Gastroactitud, y opiniones de Google Maps. Read the full article

[notasfilosoficas]

“No hay comparación entre lo que se pierde al no tener éxito y lo que se pierde al no intentarlo”

Francis Bacon

Francis Bacon fue un filósofo, escritor, político y abogado inglés nacido en Londres en enero de 1561, considerado padre del empirismo filosófico y científico.

Era el hijo menor de Nicholas Bacon, guardián del gran sello de la reina Isabel I, y su madre Anne Cooke, una de las mujeres mas ilustradas de la época.

Su formación estuvo a cargo de su madre y se basó en los principios del puritanismo calvinista. A la edad de trece años Bacon ingresa al Trinity College de Cambridge en 1573 y cursa estudios junto con su hermano hasta 1576, en donde el estudio de diversas ciencias lo lleva a la conclusión de que los métodos empleados y los resultados obtenidos eran erróneos.

A su juicio, la filosofía precisaba de un verdadero cometido y de nuevos métodos para alcanzarlos, Bacon fue enviado a Francia como agregado del embajador, en donde la situación política y social en Francia durante el reinado de Enrique III le proporcionaron al joven Francis una muy valiosa experiencia política.

A la muerte prematura de su padre en 1579, Francis se vió obligado a regresar a Londres y a terminar sus estudios en abogacía, derivado del exiguo patrimonio que heredó de su padre, en donde comenzó a ejercer la abogacía y cuatro años mas tarde es elegido (por mediación de su tío), miembro de la cámara de los Comunes dando comienzo a su carrera política.

Su situación mejora con la subida al trono de Jacobo I quien lo nombró procurador general en 1607, fiscal de la Corona en 1613 y lord canciller en 1618, además de obtener algunos títulos nobiliarios. A pesar de verse involucrado en problemas de corrupción y maltrato a sus subordinados, logró salir de los problemas y con la fortuna adquirida y dedicó sus siguientes años al estudio de la filosofía y las ciencias.

Los escritos de Bacon se engloban en tres categorías: filosófica, literaria y política. Sus obras filosóficas mas prominentes son “El avance del saber” (1605), y el “Novum Organum” o indicaciones relativas a la interpretación de la naturaleza en 1620.

Se propuso ante todo reorganizar el método de estudio científico percibiendo que el razonamiento deductivo destacaba a expensas del razonamiento inductivo y creyó que eliminando toda noción preconcebida del mundo, se podía y debía estudiar al hombre y su entorno mediante observaciones detalladas y controladas realizando generalizaciones cautelosas.

Su “Novum Organum” influyó mucho en la aceptación de la ciencia de una observación y experimentación precisas. Se le reconoce haber aportado a la lógica el método experimental inductivo.

Como escritor se le debe la creación del género ensayístico en ingles, con sus “Ensayos sobre moral y política” en 1597.

En “La nueva Atlántida” escrita en 1610, ofrece la primera utopía tecnológica, en donde los gobernantes serán los científicos de la “Casa de Salomón”, una especie de gran universidad y en donde se prevén grandes adelantos científicos como maquinas voladoras, submarinos y telecomunicaciones, no obstante su aparente relación con los grupos herméticos como la francmasonería y los rosacruces, profetizaba que especialmente los rosacruces llegarían a ser los científicos gobernantes.

Bacon es considerado el primer representante del empirismo inglés, corriente filosófica que postula la experiencia como fuente de todo conocimiento y que tendría un amplio desarrollo en la obra de John Locke, George Berkeley y David Hume.

Francis Bacon muere a la edad de 65 años de neumonía y una estatua de él se localiza en el Trinity College de Cambridge.

Fuentes: Wikipedia, biografiasyvidas.com, ua.es y encyclopaedia.herdereditorial.com

[psicologiaanyolisequera]

¡Hola queridos lectores! Es un gusto tenerlos nuevamente en este espacio donde juntos estudiaremos en un tema muy importante que día a día nos hace más frente como lo es la psicología.

¿Qué es la psicología?

La psicología es la ciencia que estudia el comportamiento humano y los procesos mentales, su objetivo es comprender cómo las personas piensan, sienten y actúan en diferentes circunstancias; esta disciplina abarca una amplia variedad de temas, incluyendo la percepción, la emoción, la motivación, el aprendizaje, la personalidad y las relaciones interpersonales.

Orígenes y evolución

La psicología tiene sus raíces en la filosofía y la biología, grandes filósofos como Sócrates, Platón y Aristóteles ya se preguntaban sobre la naturaleza del ser humano y la mente, sin embargo, como disciplina científica, la psicología comenzó a tomar forma en el siglo XIX, con la fundación de laboratorios de psicología experimental. Wilhelm Wundt, considerado el padre de la psicología, estableció el primer laboratorio en 1879 en Leipzig, Alemania, donde se centró en la medición de procesos mentales a través de la introspección.

Desde entonces, la psicología ha evolucionado en diversas corrientes y enfoques, incluyendo el psicoanálisis, el conductismo, la psicología humanista, la psicología cognitiva y la psicología social, entre otros, cada una de estas corrientes ofrece diferentes perspectivas sobre cómo entender y tratar los problemas psicológicos.

Áreas de Estudio

La psicología abarca una amplia variedad de áreas, entre ellas podemos mencionar:

Psicología Clínica: Se centra en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de trastornos mentales y; los psicólogos clínicos utilizan diversas técnicas terapéuticas para ayudar a las personas a superar sus dificultades.

Psicología del Desarrollo: Estudia cómo las personas cambian y se desarrollan a lo largo de su vida, desde la infancia hasta la vejez, examina aspectos como el desarrollo cognitivo, emocional y social.

Psicología Social: Analiza cómo las interacciones sociales y el entorno influyen en el comportamiento y las actitudes de las personas, investiga temas como la conformidad, la persuasión y la dinámica de grupo.

Psicología Cognitiva: Se ocupa de los procesos mentales involucrados en la percepción, el aprendizaje, la memoria y la toma de decisiones, esta área investiga cómo las personas procesan la información y cómo esto afecta su comportamiento.

Psicología Industrial-Organizacional: Aplica principios psicológicos al entorno laboral, centrándose en la productividad, la motivación y el bienestar de los empleados.

Importancia de la Psicología

La psicología es fundamental para comprender la complejidad del comportamiento humano, sus hallazgos tienen aplicaciones prácticas en diversas áreas, como la educación, la salud, el trabajo y las relaciones interpersonales. Al mismo tiempo, la psicología contribuye a la promoción del bienestar mental y emocional, ayudando a las personas a enfrentar desafíos y mejorar su calidad de vida.

En un mundo cada vez más complejo y acelerado, la psicología nos ofrece excelentes herramientas para entendernos a nosotros mismos y a los demás, nos ayuda a desarrollar habilidades de afrontamiento, mejorar nuestras relaciones y fomentar un entorno más saludable y comprensivo.

Por lo que la psicología es una disciplina que nos permite explorar la mente humana y el comportamiento desde múltiples perspectivas; a medida que continuamos avanzando en nuestra comprensión de la psicología, se hace evidente que su relevancia es más importante que nunca en nuestra vida cotidiana. Ya sea a través de la terapia, la investigación o la educación, la psicología tiene el potencial de transformar vidas y contribuir al bienestar de la sociedad en su conjunto.

Un placer compartir este espacio con ustedes ¡Nos leemos en la próxima entrada!

Referencias:

Wundt, W. (1879). Principios de psicología fisiológica. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.

Goleman, D. (1995). Inteligencia emocional. Barcelona: Editorial Kairós.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). La auténtica felicidad. Barcelona: Ediciones Urano.

Cohen, J. (2009). Psicología social. México: McGraw-Hill.

[musexplat]

RUIDO20240028: CÉSAR JONES «El PORNO es el Mensaje» | Entrevista

⏩ En el fascinante universo de César Jones, cineasta de La Plata, descubrimos cómo su formación en Comunicación Audiovisual, Filosofía y Psicología alimenta su cine experimental, desafíando las convenciones del porno tradicional. César Jones, formalmente, en entrevista con El RUIDO es el Mensaje. ──────────🎚️ Signal Flow =⏩⫸────────── █ #ENÉSTARUTA: CÉSAR JONES, en entrevista con El RUIDO es el…