#feeding essentials

[agirivertt33]

Exploring the Benefits of Momcozy Bottle Sterilizers for New Moms

As a new member of the parenting community, I'm excited to share some insights on a fantastic product that has been a game-changer for me: the Momcozy bottle sterilizer.

Having a baby comes with a lot of responsibilities, and ensuring that your little one's bottles are clean and safe is one of the top priorities. Momcozy has developed a bottle sterilizer that effectively eliminates harmful germs and makes the process incredibly convenient for busy parents.

What I love about the Momcozy bottle sterilizer is its user-friendly design. You can easily sterilize multiple bottles at once, and the quick cycle time means you won't have to wait long to have clean bottles ready for feeding. This has been especially helpful during those late-night feedings when every minute counts!

Additionally, the sterilizer is compact and fits perfectly on my kitchen counter, making it easy to access whenever I need it. The peace of mind that comes with knowing my baby's bottles are thoroughly sanitized is truly invaluable.

In my journey as a new mom, I've found that products like the Momcozy bottle sterilizer not only simplify our daily routines but also enhance our overall parenting experience. If you're a new parent looking for an efficient way to keep your baby's feeding essentials clean, I highly recommend checking out Momcozy's bottle sterilizer. It's a small investment for a big return in safety and convenience!

[tumesap053]

The Benefits of Using a Baby Bottle Cleaner

When it comes to keeping your baby's feeding essentials clean and safe, using a dedicated baby bottle cleaner is essential. Brands like momcozy offer excellent products that ensure thorough cleaning without harmful chemicals. Their baby bottle cleaner is designed to easily remove milk residue and other stubborn stains, making it a perfect choice for busy parents.

Not only does a good baby bottle cleaner help maintain hygiene, but it also extends the life of your bottles and ensures that your baby enjoys every feeding without any unwanted flavors. With momcozy's commitment to quality, you can trust that their cleaning products are safe for both your baby and the environment.

Investing in a reliable baby bottle cleaner from momcozy will give you peace of mind, knowing that you are providing the best for your little one. Happy cleaning!

[askonynafuz947]

Exploring the Benefits of Momcozy's Bottle Washer for New Parents

As a new parent, finding the right products to simplify daily routines can be a game changer. One innovative solution in the maternal and baby products industry is the momcozy bottle washer. This handy tool is designed to make cleaning baby bottles easier and more efficient, ensuring that your little one's feeding essentials are always squeaky clean.

The momcozy bottle washer features a user-friendly design that allows parents to quickly wash bottles without the hassle of traditional methods. Its gentle yet effective cleaning mechanism ensures that every nook and cranny is reached, providing peace of mind for parents who want the best for their babies.

Additionally, this product is made from safe, high-quality materials, making it a reliable choice for busy parents. By incorporating the momcozy bottle washer into your daily routine, you can spend less time worrying about cleaning and more time enjoying precious moments with your baby. Overall, momcozy is dedicated to supporting parents in their journey, and their bottle washer is a fantastic addition to any family's toolkit.

[belmastasoup]

Explore Your Favorite Maternal and Baby Products

I enjoy discovering the amazing maternal and baby products that parents are loving these days! One standout is the momcozy automatic bottle washer, which makes cleaning bottles a breeze. It's so convenient and ensures that your baby's feeding essentials are always hygienic and ready to use. Share your favorite products and let's celebrate the wonderful innovations that make parenting a little easier!

[nancy789uio]

Explore the All-in-One Bottle Washer Sterilizer Dryer from Momcozy

Hi everyone,

I'm excited to share my experience with the Momcozy all-in-one bottle washer sterilizer dryer! As a new parent, I was on the lookout for a convenient solution to keep my baby's bottles clean and sterilized. This amazing product has truly made my life easier.

The Momcozy device not only washes but also sterilizes and dries the bottles in one go, saving me precious time and effort. The design is user-friendly, and I love how it can accommodate different bottle sizes. Plus, it’s very efficient and leaves the bottles sparkling clean!

If you are a parent looking for a reliable and efficient way to maintain your baby's feeding essentials, I highly recommend checking out the Momcozy all-in-one bottle washer sterilizer dryer. It’s a game changer for busy moms and dads!

Thanks for reading!

[coreymendoza8947]

Bottle Washers in the Maternal and Baby Products Industry

Hello everyone! I'm excited to share my thoughts on the amazing innovations in the maternal and baby products industry, particularly focusing on the brand momcozy and their fantastic bottle washer.

Momcozy has really outdone themselves by creating a bottle washer that makes cleaning baby bottles a breeze! It's efficient, easy to use, and gentle on all types of materials, ensuring that your little one's feeding essentials are always spotless and safe.

With the rise in awareness about hygiene, having a reliable bottle washer is crucial for every parent. Momcozy’s commitment to quality and convenience shines through in their products, making parenting just a little easier.

Have any of you tried the momcozy bottle washer? I'd love to hear your experiences!

Best, A Happy Parent

[littlenest0]

Now Get Your Feeding Essentials at the Best Price! 

Feeding your toddler is quite a job. So, it is always better to get the best quality feeding essentials from Little Nest at the best price. So, visit them now and grab them! 

[kelocitta]

Anthro Spearmaster.... Slugscav? Scavlizard? All of the above? Something else? No ones quite sure.

Spearmaster presented another interesting conflict similar to Artificer, where if you make them one-to-one you end up making someone (Suns) look a lot more fucked up than they really are. Since while, regardless of how you feel about animal experimentation, you can probably agree its less fucked up than human experimentation. But get rid of too much and you lose what makes Spearmaster Spearmaster- So they certainly aren't an ethical creation, but a little less unethical than literally removing a creatures mouth and making it feed via bone needles. Still not a normal slugcat by any means, and one that uses that to their advantage. Local towns see them as everything from a normal individual, to a weird hybrid, to something entirely supernatural. They keep the details to themselves and their iterator and are happy that way.

[sea-lanterns]

"I'm such a simp for my wife that my mind created a being like her in a creepy town to handle my grief and guilt. Anyway- We had sex and I will stay here forever now"

- Us, without the denial.

Crazy brainrot here, but I can't help but think about the spirit of wife Dehya still being here. And Pyramid Head Dehya hearing her.

"GENTLE. SHE'S PRECIOUS"

".....precious. Mine."

"She was mine first, copycat. I tolerate you for her own well-being. Kiss her on the forehead and pet her head. She likes it."

LMFAOOO. Let Reader live out in her delusions, she’s been through a lot 🥺

Also the bit where the ghost of Dehya is somehow still alive within Slasher! Dehya is very funny. Though it won’t be canon, I really like it and would like to elaborate on it!

Imagine all the funny shenanigans that go on between Ghost! Dehya and Slasher! Dehya inside her head. Slasher! Dehya is always very quiet in comparison to the real Dehya, so I can see the real Dehya trying to hype her up so she can try and get most of her wife personality back.

Ghost! Dehya, shouting internally: WHAT ARE YOU DOING? Don’t just leave your dishes in the sink, DO THEM!

Slasher! Dehya: …Okay. I will do them.

Ghost! Dehya: Good, good. You should vacuum for (Reader) too. She works very hard at her job, so after that you should run her a hot bath, maybe use one of those bath bombs she likes so much…

[evelyn-and-art]

When The Fox Scholar is Charmed by The Peddler

My (late) submission for Week 1 of Tea’s SuoSaku MonsterFucking Month, inspired by Episode 2: Goose Mountain from the Yao-Chinese Folktales (2023).

Bonus Art + Sneak Peak for Week 2

Bro just dubcon-ed the poor guy for his geese and ran off, leaving a very angry and confused (+ a lil turned on) vendor.

Also, I’ve had the Fox Yaoguai-Scholar! Suo thing stuck in my brain for weeks and I just decided to use the idea for Tea’s MFM na lang because why not…and it’s hot. On that note, I originally had the idea to assign the boar demon to Sakura (which if you aren’t familiar with the story; the boar demon is the lover of the fox demon’s concubine aka rabbit demon), but then I remember the chemistry between the peddler and the fox scholar so I went with that instead.

Lastly, here’s a lil preview of my piece for Week 2: Ghosts/“He Came Back Wrong”

[iristial]

Dialogue like this really enforces that I may be a Glotta appreciator and Stomach Twins fan but I'm gonna need Shouma's siblings to die miserable, painful deaths to make up for a little under a quarter of Shouma's thought process here

Sweetie....Sachika will probably and literally burn down Stomach Inc. into ashes herself if she finds out what's been going on so your relatives have something to eat before she sends them packing to the afterlife because sure, they suck but it clearly pains you to kill them and how can she let her best employee of the month, the sweetest person to exist, down like that? Might as well give them a side dish, free on the house, along with that knuckle sandwich

[thewalrusespublicist]

Out of curiosity, would anyone want me to post some of the Mike Tree (the Dakota's gardener) interview from SATB? There's a lot of really interesting tidbits that I've not seen on here before that I think might be of interest.

[carlyraejepsans]

HELPP i found out about character AIs and im losing it over calling deltarune sans "a more manipulative personality" 😭😭 like whatt we've only seen this man like 2 times

sorry im being a hater hgfjdks but you're the sans understander

lmaoo character.ai, look where the fall of ai dungeon got us, smh. thank you for the compliment though!

[siyelius]

It’s sweet how ralph played along with treating alice like a human child despite knowing from the start she was an android when kara expressed otherwise.

[kedreeva]

Sorry about the color mix up. I appreciate the reply and additional info! I guess bc I know nothing about peafowl (and the fact i dont breed any type of animal), I'm having a hard time understanding how being sterile would be unethical. I do somewhat get the shortened life span. I really would like to understand this, I just sometimes need stuff explained like I'm 5.

Up front, there's no "somewhat get" to a shortened lifespan being caused by a mutation in captive populations. If an animal is capable of living 20+ years (and some live 30+ or even 40+!) and some non-essential mutation is causing them to live 7-9 years, it's flat out absolutely unethical to breed that mutation, full stop, regardless of anything else going on. That's indicative of a MAJOR problem in their genetics. There's NO ethical reason to breed that because humans like how it looks. So, even without the sterility, these birds would 100% be unethical to produce.

The short answer on sterility is this: we don't know WHY they are sterile, but they shouldn't be, and that means something has gone wrong. When something goes wrong with an animal, and it's something genetic that can be passed on, the ONLY responsible and ethical thing for a breeder to do is to stop using that animal for breeding and closely monitor any already-produced offspring for signs of the problem, and likely not breed them, either.

The longer more complicated answer is this: sometimes it's possible to separate the problem from the aesthetic when it comes to morphs, like it was for cameo + blindness, but sometimes it's NOT, like it wasn't for spider + head wobble for ball pythons. In those instances, it's... difficult. Because you're LIKELY going to produce animals that suffer the same problem as their parent(s), in the attempt to separate the problem from the aesthetic, and sometimes that's ALL you're going to produce. As a breeder, it's your absolute responsibility to NOT release the offspring into the general population, where the problem may be replicated without control, and to keep or cull the affected individuals if the problem cannot be separated from the aesthetic, or AT BEST find them guaranteed pet-only homes that will NEVER breed them.

Sometimes the problem IS purely aesthetic or harmless, like it was for pied in peafowl, and sometimes it's not, like it was for vitiligo in peafowl. The problem comes when you ASSUME a mutation is the first, and treat it like the first when it's really the second. This has caused FAR reaching consequences in the peafowl community, and I'm sure in others, where now the autoimmune disease that first bronze had has been passed into genpop by folks who thought they were breeding a harmless new variation of pied. Hybrid animals are often sterile (not in peafowl though, hybrid cristatus-muticus birds are fertile) because of a mismatch in chromosome pairing numbers, and often that's harmless. So, in some cases sterility is not an issue because it's the expected result or is otherwise harmless... but in the case of peafowl, it's NOT an expected result and we don't know if it's caused by something harmless or not.

Some species, like mice and horses and cattle and dogs, genetic testing and DNA mapping done with millions of dollars has proven that while some stuff isn't purely aesthetic, it also doesn't cause harm to the animal in a way that affects quality of life or that can be adapted for in captive care. For example, in chickens, the frizzle gene causes curled feathers in single copy and an absence of feathers in double copy. This gene is considered ethical to produce IF the breeding is done responsibly by putting a single copy bird over a zero copy bird, which produces smooth coats and frizzle coats, but it is unethical to produce double frizzles (called "frazzles") because frazzles cannot thermoregulate, can easily sunburn, and easily suffer skin injury during normal chicken activity.

For peafowl, we have NO genetic testing. We do not have the genome mapped. As far as I know there's a research group working on it (mostly for green peafowl though, in conservation efforts), but that's not remotely finished or available to the public to test anything. We don't know where any of the morph mutations sit, or what is causing them or if they do anything beyond just change the color. Sometimes color mutations are the result of malfunctions in enzymes. For charcoal specifically, we don't know what the mutation does, besides what we can observe on the outside- the birds have half or less the lifespan of normal birds, poor feather quality, and the hens are sterile. Is the sterility harmless like it is in some hybrid animals, or is it actually a major organ failing? Is it the only major organ that fails due to this mutation, or is it just the first sign of their shortened lives? Is it some deficiency in something the birds need to be healthy? Does it hurt the bird? We don't know, but we do know the mutation and the problems (multiple, please do NOT forget that this is one OF MORE THAN ONE problems) can't be separated, and so until we do know why and whether it's harmless or not, the ONLY ethical response to seeing a problem in a major organ's function linked inextricably to a mutation in color is to not propagate that mutation. If someone wanted to fork over the millions it takes to sequence and map genomes and then determine exactly what is going on with peafowl, that would be nice and good, but I don't see that happening. When I win the lottery big, I'll be doing it, but til then we can only follow normal breeding guidelines

Also, to put this into perspective... peafowl mature sexually around 3 years old. They are chicks until the turn of the new year following their hatch. They are yearlings that year, and immature 2yo next year. They aren't actually considered fully grown until 6 years old, and should live another 14+ years. Charcoal birds die a 1-3 years after full maturity. Is it a coincidence that they fail to thrive shortly after full sexual maturity, or is it linked? Again, we don't know. We don't know if the sterility is fine or if it's just a symptom of something worse.

Even without the sterility, though, charcoal has enough issues it would be unethical. If it was JUST sterility, with no other deleterious effects, then maybe it would be different. But it's not.

[hikeyzz]

i'm so fucking over it lol wdym "it sounds like you need to be seen within the next three days" my throat's just slowly swelling shut??? it's not THAT big of a deal can't i put it off for another like several weeks??? i mean its fineeeeee it's not even the breathing tube its the food one!!! i can survive plannyyy of time without eating i'll be fineeeeeee