#fancy trap

[plasticsweets]

Knitted leg warmers, Fancy Trap

[sourkreem]

jason bby i think that shirt might be a little too thin for working out.

i tried to render the skin looking a bit sweaty, but i dont think im there yet

[p4nishers]

thinking abt how azi was truly crowley's sunlight through the millenniums. like, here's this demon who didn't mean to fall, who just asked questions and deep down he was still so good. and he is alone, he's the literally the emboidement of the first sin, and NOT by his own choosing. he's so alone and afraid and just wants a real conversation w someone, even if its an angel who'll most likely hate him. and here's the guardian of eden, who gave away his sword, that GOD gave to him, without asking a single question, to help the humans under his charge and he's kind to crowley and crowley is utterly fascinated. zira is basically the first protector, not only to adam and eve BUT CROWLEY TOO. he protects crowley from the first rain bc he's so fundamentally good and kind and crowley can't help seeking him out over the years. when they meet in rome, c is obviously far more withdrawn and angry bc of the things he's seen and was forced to do and there's az again, so happy to see him and even inviting him to dinner. everytime they met, even when crowley was saving azira, he also saved crowley by the simple act of being his friend.

[cloudyvulpine]

watching Stolas antis call him the worst father ever is getting kinda hilarious

like you do realize Stolas is a good dad who is doing his absolute best despite dealing with an angsty teen AND going through a complicated new relationship AND a messy ass divorce where his ex is literally hiring an assassain

not to mention we don't know if stella is twisting the story and/or Octavia's perspective of what's happening (no hate to Octavia ofc, she's just a kid)

tldr Stolas is a good dad in a rough patch, and also stop pulling shit out of your ass and claiming it's canon you just look extra stupid guys

[notbecauseofvictories]

I realize this is a weird question for a Sunday morning, but does anybody have particularly incisive articles about the tension between architectural preservation and the need (because I do think it's a need!) for new buildings, new spaces, and revising the landscape of a city?

I'm watching a piece on Richard Nickel, who is almost single-handedly responsible for photographing the work of Louis Sullivan and other architects of the Chicago Prairie School, prior to their demolition in the 60s. It's a great piece, and I love Nickel's photographs, but as someone who knows only the Chicago that sprang up in the wake of Nickel's, I can't help but wonder if there's more than simple aesthetics at play here.

[caterjunes]

personally i have to clear out the drain every single time i shower. prior to getting a really effective fancy hair trap i had to clear it out at least 2 times per shower lol. ya girl has THICK SHEDDING HAIR

[albatris]

I can't wait for the Reuben March Fancy Gala scene

[heart-forecast]

Lace legwarmers ! ( source ! )

[silvertiefling]

where do u losers find the energy to make such fancy icons,,, i have ideas and templates and test runs but to have to shove every icon into them and stick it all together sounds like such a chore my brain automatically shuts oFF

[lenateliier]

Average day in the Moriarty household god bless Louis' patience with these two

[marzipanandminutiae]

Hot Take

museums should label 19th-century women’s clothing primarily by formality (except in the case of garments with specific purposes, eg. “cycling costume” or “nightgown”), not by the 10,000 different terms they might be called at the time

my reasoning is that the current hodgepodge of terms, while technically accurate to the period:

1. reinforces the myth that middle- or upper-class women used to always change their dresses many times a day No Matter What, rather than what seems to me the primary-source-supported reality- that they changed situationally, as necessary

2. promotes unnecessary disconnect between the past and the present. we have varying degrees of clothing formality today, just without specific terms for each one. they had garments that could serve for multiple purposes and be dressed up or down with accessories back then. but because we don’t talk about an “afternoon dress” vs. a “ball gown” and they didn’t talk about the dress code for a party being “nice casual” vs. “dressy.” there’s this false idea that our systems of clothing changes/formality are Totally Different. which is really not the case, I think

3. even they couldn’t agree on what to call each individual outfit! I’ve seen fashion plates in magazines where the textual description and the label on the image give the same dress different names

this post brought to you by: Marzi Has Seen Too Many Gowns Labeled “Evening Gown” On Museum Websites Apparently For Their Formality When In Truth They Do Not Have The Single Factor That Usually Made A Dress Strictly For Evening At The Time (namely, revealing more skin about the chest and arms) And Therefore Would Have Stood Just As Well For Formal Daytime Events

[kodasea]

Cape Falmouth Map (2021)

[sick-sad-little-world]

Not "Floppa," not "Sogga"...

Predators, not pets.

Learn more.

[zrllosyn-art]

Ness Taliseium for @mumiku-art on artfight

[normalbrothers]

but even if gay incestified dorian gray it's still gonna suck, because they are making the story a modern au :(

[puppetsoftomorrow]

i swear at the beginning of the avalance fandom there were So many fics where ava and sara had to go undercover at couples resorts,, i would just love a fic abt the villian who sets this up. like imagine a villian is like fuck, these two keep ruining my plans, if i can make them fall in love they'll be too interested in eachother to stop me!!