#expert evidence
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
reallyimpossibledetective · 22 days ago
Text
A Disjointed and Somewhat Incoherent Discrimination Case.
The discrimination law case of Giggle -v- Tickle For Girls (No 2) [2024] FCA 960 agitated some interesting issues.
Relevantly, the Court looked at Dr Helen Joyce and found: • She has a PhD in mathematics and is also a journalist and author • but does not have any formal education or qualifications even in biology, let alone in gender, sex or law, being the topics which her report purports to address. • She has no recognised expertise in any of the areas in which she purports to express an expert opinion. • What was proffered as an expert report, was received as nothing more than submissions [Paragraph 145]. • Her opinion was of no assistance to the case of the Respondents or to the Court [Paragraph 147].
The Court also found that case of the Respondents was run in a disjointed and somewhat incoherent way [Paragraph 215].
I find it extraordinary that a litigant (represented by experienced lawyers) seeking to be taken seriously, would endeavour to lead evidence from someone with no recognised expertise in any of the areas in which they purport to express an expert opinion.
Similarly, running your case in a disjointed and incoherent way is hardly a recipe for success and does little to enhance a reputation as capable and credible lawyers.
This critique informs the capacity of those litigants and lawyers to subsequently credibly comment upon the strengths and weaknesses of the case.
Credibility and coherence are crucial in legal proceedings. Sometimes, the passion to win can overshadow critical self-assessment, leading to disjointed arguments and reliance on unqualified witnesses who are proffered as experts.
Offering a non-expert as an expert and presenting a disjointed case can stem from a few key issues: • Overconfidence: The litigants or their lawyers might believe that the credibility of the individual or the strength of their arguments will prevail, regardless of expertise. • Desperation: Sometimes, a lack of strong, qualified experts can lead parties to lean on anyone with relevant-sounding credentials, even if they do not have recognised expertise. • Zealous Advocacy: A passionate belief in the righteousness of their cause can blind lawyers to the weaknesses in their approach. They become so focussed on winning, that they overlook the importance of coherence and credible evidence.
These missteps often result in weakened cases and can undermine the credibility of those involved. A successful strategy requires a clear, coherent presentation and expert testimony that stands up to scrutiny. Not always easy to acquire, but necessary.
It is quite telling when those who were ill-prepared lament their loss. Running a case in such a way and then decrying the outcome, shows a glaring lack of self-awareness and accountability. Preparing thoroughly and presenting a coherent, well-supported argument is foundational for credibility.
Presenting a non-expert as an expert is a sure-fire way to erode trust and credibility. It is astonishing that experienced lawyers would risk the attendant diminution of their reputation. This not only weakens their case, but also makes them look laughably under-prepared.
When you are too invested, sometimes your own biases and emotions cloud your judgment.
In the subject case the legislation was the problem and the judgment of the Court clearly stated that biology was not a relevant issue. Subsequently dealing with the problematic legislation has more utility than endlessly crying about biology.
If the legislation is flawed, that is the root issue to tackle. Getting bogged down in irrelevant debates only distracts from meaningful progress. Addressing the problematic legislation directly is the way forward, rather than fixating on ancillary issues.
0 notes
aiolegalservices · 6 months ago
Text
Pre-Action Protocols, Expert Evidence, and Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Efficient Legal Dispute Management
  Paragraph 6 of the Pre-action Conduct of all proceedings confirms that if a relevant pre-action protocol exists, parties are required to follow it before initiating legal action. This ensures that both sides take certain preliminary steps, such as sharing information and exploring potential settlements, to possibly resolve the dispute without court intervention. If no specific protocol applies,…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
lexlawuk · 2 years ago
Text
‘Specialist Solicitors’ Facing Professional Negligence Claim for Failing to Advise Client on Settlement Offers and Expert Evidence
‘Specialist Solicitors’ Facing Professional Negligence Claim for Failing to Advise Client on Settlement Offers and Expert Evidence
Ellis v John Hodge Solicitors (a firm) [2022] EWHC 2284 (Comm) is a case in which the claimant initially instructed the defendant solicitors for representation in a personal injury claim. Following a dissatisfactory result, the claimant filed professional negligence proceedings against his solicitors. The Claimant then requested disclosure of his client file from the personal injury claim to…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
hotvintagepoll · 4 months ago
Note
recently discovered some fascinating hobbies for a few of the older tv men ive been submitting for the vintage tv polls and that got me wondering what (if any) strange/niche/unique hobbies have you ever encountered among classic film actors?
I think my favorite is Danny Kaye, who was apparently the type of guy who would fall in love with something and fall hard—he wanted to learn how to fly a plane, so he did; he conducted orchestras with 0 ability to read sheet music; he became so riveted by the art of Asian cuisine he started studying under master chefs Johnny Kan and Cecilia Chiang in their San Francisco restaurants, eventually building a separate kitchen into his house to support his obsession, which lasted the rest of his life. I just think that's neat.
121 notes · View notes
dont-offend-the-bees · 4 days ago
Note
Hi there! I have a UK specific question for Dead Boy Detectives. Something I see a lot in fic is the hc that Charles is working class and Edwin is rich. Do their different accents (like in the post you just reblogged) support this hc or is there other cultural context that I’m missing? I thought their differences in presentation were just down to era, but I’d be interested to hear what you think!
Yes! Charles' accent is far more commonly associated with working classes and Edwin's is much more common in the upper/middle classes (and Edwin's accent is more the type of accent you're taught to emulate if you have a regional/working class accent and want to be taken seriously in your career etc.). It's not the only indicator, Charles' involvement in the ska/rudeboy/skinhead subcultures would also make more sense for a working class lad, but it's a very strong indicator.
I'm afraid I'm personally not an accent buff (I just live here etc) so I couldn't tell you *exactly* what variation of working class London accent Charles has but yes, it's quite a major hint. Not to say someone middle/upper class COULDN'T have that accent but it's definitely not the norm — and any working class kid who talks like Edwin is liable to get picked on in school for being posh (speaking from experience — I wasn't posh but my parents sure talked like they were and I absorbed it like a sponge lmao. My mum actually ditched her working class Manchester accent when she moved to London and became an opera critic among other things, to this day she talks more like a posh southerner, sounds Completely different to her brothers who never left Manc).
In the comic I *think* the school basically takes in the kids of people in active military service, so Charles or anyone being there isn't necessarily a sign of being rich, idk if show Paul Rowland is meant to be military but if not it seems likely to me that Charles' family lived in the school's catchment area so he got in as a day boy (non-boarder) by virtue of it being his closest school.
55 notes · View notes
antaripirate · 4 months ago
Text
apologies for the random ass personal post but i graduated!!!!
Tumblr media Tumblr media
having finished a degree feels incredibly fucking weird, but i now have a BSc. and the fact that i have a full scholarship for my research MSc in a couple of months is still insane to me. i’m also going to be working with the British Antarctic Survey which has always been a fucking dream for me.
anyway. successfully collected my first set of letters and i wanted to post something even though i’ll delete it.
this is a sappy ass post but i’m working class, disabled and first gen and so for me this is fucking huge.
anyway. i’m very proud of this :)
59 notes · View notes
sandymybeloved · 8 months ago
Text
an incomplete guide to UNIT Dating
I recently made and gave this presentation, so the information isn't entirely complete, but here. Basically I looked at every story the Brigadier appeared in and (with the help of this TARDIS wiki article) tried to put a date to all of them. some slides are missing to fit this into a single post, but not many and none essential
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
61 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 4 months ago
Text
"Among their complaints [in 1460, the Yorkists] specifically blamed the earls of Wiltshire and Shrewsbury and Viscount Beaumont for ‘stirring’ the king [Henry VI] to hold a parliament at Coventry that would attaint them and for keeping them from the king’s presence and likely mercy, asserting that this was done against [the king's] will. To this they added the charge that these evil counselors were also tyrannizing other true men* without the king’s knowledge. Such claims of malfeasance obliquely raised the question of Henry’s fitness as a king, for how could he be deemed competent if such things happened without his knowledge and against his wishes? They also tied in rumors circulating somewhat earlier in the southern counties and likely to have originated in Calais that Henry was really ‘good and gracious Lord to the [Yorkists] since, it was alleged, he had not known of or assented to their attainders. On 11 June the king was compelled to issue a proclamation stating that they were indeed traitors and that assertions to the contrary were to be ignored." - Helen Maurer, "Margaret of Anjou: "Queenship and Power in Late Medieval England"
Three things that we can surmise from this:
We know where the "Henry was an innocent helpless king being controlled and manipulated by his Evil™ advisors" rhetoric came from**.
The Yorkists were deliberately trying to downplay Henry VI's actual role and involvement in politics and the Wars of the Roses. They cast him as a "statue of a king", blamed all royal policies and decisions on others*** (claiming that Henry wasn't even aware of them), and framed themselves as righteous and misunderstood counselors who remained loyal to the crown. We should keep this in mind when we look at chronicles' comments of Henry's alleged passivity and the so-called "role reversal" between him and Queen Margaret.
Henry VI's actual agency and involvement is nevertheless proven by his own actions. We know what he thought of the Yorkists, and we know he took the effort to publicly counter their claims through a proclamation of his own. That speaks louder than the politically motivated narrative of his enemies, don't you think?
*There was some truth to these criticisms. For example, Wiltshire (ie: one of the men named in the pamphlet) was reportedly involved in a horrible situation in June which included hangings and imprisonments for tax resistance in Newbury. The best propagandists always contain a degree of truth, etc. **I've seen some theories on why Margaret of Anjou wasn't mentioned in these pamphlets alongside the others even though she was clearly being vilified during that time as well, and honestly, I think those speculations are mostly unnecessary. Margaret was absent because it was regarded as very unseemly to target queens in such an officially public manner. We see a similar situation a decade later: Elizabeth Woodville was vilified and her whole family - popularly and administratively known as "the queen's kin" - was disparaged in Warwick and Clarence's pamphlets. This would have inevitably associated her with their official complaints far more than Margaret had been, but she was also not directly mentioned. It was simply not considered appropriate. ***This narrative was begun by the Duke of York & Warwick and was - demonstrably - already widespread by the end of 1460. When Edward IV came to power, there seems to have been a slight shift in how he spoke of Henry (he referred to Henry as their "great enemy and adversary"; his envoys were clearly willing to acknowledge Henry's role in Lancastrian resistance to Yorkist rule; etc), but he nevertheless continued the former narrative for the most part. I think this was because 1) it was already well-established and widespread by his father, and 2) downplaying Henry's authority would have served to emphasize Edward's own kingship, which was probably advantageous for a usurper whose deposed rival was still alive and out of reach. In some sense, the Lancastrians did the same thing with their own propaganda across the 1460s, which was clearly not as effective in terms of garnering support and is too long to get into right now, but was still very relevant when it came to emphasizing their own right to the throne while disparaging the Yorkists' claim.
#henry vi#my post#wars of the roses#margaret of anjou#Look I’m not trying to argue that Henry VI was secretly some kind of Perfect King™ whose only misfortune was to be targeted by the Yorkists#That is...obviously pushing it and obviously not true#Henry was very imperfect; he did make lots of errors and haphazard/unpopular decisions; and he did ultimately lose/concede defeat#in both the Hundred Years War and the subsequent Wars of the Roses.#He was also clearly less effective than his predecessor and successor (who unfortunately happened to be his father and usurper respectively#and that comparison will always affect our view of his kingship. It's inevitable and in some sense understandable.#But it's hardly fair to simply accept and parrot the Yorkist narrative of him being a “puppet of a king”.#Henry *did* have agency and he was demonstrably involved in the events around him#From sponsoring alchemists to issuing proclamations to participating in trials against the Yorkists (described in the 1459 attainder)#We also know that he was involved in administration though it seems as though he was being heavily advised/handheld by his councilors#That may be the grain of truth which the Yorkists' image of him was based on.#But regardless of Henry's aptitude he was clearly *involved* in ruling#Just like he was involved in plots against Yorkist rule in the early 1460s before he was captured.#And he did have some successes! For example in 1456 he travelled to Chester and seems to have been responsible#for reconciling Nicholas ap Gruffyd & his sons to the crown and granting them a general pardon.#Bizarrely Ralph Griffiths has credited Margaret for this even though there is literally no evidence that she was involved.#We don't even know if she travelled with Henry and the patent rolls offering the pardon never mention her.#Griffiths seems to have simply assumed that it was Margaret's doing because of 1) his own assumption that she was entirely in control#while Henry was entirely passive and 2) because it (temporarily) worked against Yorkist interests.#It's quite frustrating because this one of the most probable examples we have of Henry's own participation in ruling in the late 1450s#But as usual his involvement is ignored :/#Also all things considered:#The verdict on Henry's kingship may not have been so damning if his rule hadn't been opposed or if the Lancastrians had won the war?#Imo it's doubtful he would be remembered very well (his policies re the HYW and the economic problems of that time were hardly ideal)#but I think it's unlikely that he would have been remembered as a 'failed king' / antithesis of ideal kingship either#Does this make sense? (Henry VI experts please chime in because I am decidedly not one lol)
12 notes · View notes
bananonbinary · 2 months ago
Text
god i miss when the internet wasn't garbage. you can't google anything these days without whatever answer you're looking for getting lost under a deluge of seo ai bullshit. cannot wait until the bubble pops and we might get useable search engines again.
19 notes · View notes
whiskeyswifty · 7 months ago
Text
hereby conduct this post.... mortem.... autopsy? like the album is perhaps an examination of their past relationship like it's a dead specimen to try and find the cause of death perhaps?
12 notes · View notes
wernerherzogs · 7 months ago
Note
billie hasnt been tinkering with her face? if u see images of her from her teenager years she looks the same except ya know older cause shes 42 now
kindly disagree! as someone who has steadily watcher her career for years now, she's clearly had her share of Beauty Procedures, with the last two years in particular becoming Worrying to me
12 notes · View notes
angelmush · 8 months ago
Note
ugh ur recipe posts motivate me to feed myself better, i love seeing them whenever u post! how do you manage to like grocery shop and cook ur meals in a productive way? i find myself wanting to try recipes but end up getting the same few ingredients and making the same things 😭
i just answered a really similar ask you can refer to if this doesn't feel helpful, but the way i grocery shop and meal plan is hinged on the fact that i consume a wild amount of cooking content on the internet LOL . my process is basically that i'll pick 3-4 meals and a baked good/dessert to make throughout the week. i either come up with them myself or i'll choose a recipe to try from videos i've seen on instagram or posts from tumblr or youtube. i will try to coordinate these choices so they share some of the same ingredients to stretch my dollar and finish the things in my fridge for the week. idk if that is useful but that's the way i do it!! i also make lists of the meals i'm planning on so i don't forget and i try to plan which days i want to make them based on my work schedule and decide if/when i need to prep things ahead of time (dry brines, sauces, marinades etc) and i keep a little schedule in my notes app
10 notes · View notes
surprisinglydomestickakashi · 9 months ago
Text
My favorite part about being still into Naruto is the way I'm into it means I frequently have to tell algorithms that I don't actually want to consume Naruto like they want me to. Don't give me bland voice over theories from people who need to be reminded of minor characters. I need my clinically not-normal girls, gays, and theys to talk with about the little side guys they have entire lives mapped out for, the interpretations that include their favorite filler episode because they like it and above all else people who don't shit on the women characters or only consider them, annoying and useless or waifu material.
10 notes · View notes
cave-monkey · 9 months ago
Text
It dawns on me that the journey to the west took 5,040 days exactly, right, and while the book goes from tribulation to tribulation, there were still only 81 of those. And they were missing one when they got there. And some of the tribulations Tripitaka went through happened before the journey even started.
So, even being generous and saying that most of the tribulations that occurred during the actual journey could be said to have taken a few days to handle each, that's still only about 10% of the journey. A tribulation was anything that happened that put Tripitaka in danger or presented any sort of obstacle to him. Anything even remotely exciting would have fallen into that ~10%, and nothing else could have happened, because otherwise they wouldn't have gotten west one moderate inconvenience and/or major trauma short of the prize. (I mean, unless the thing that happened managed to not involve Tripitaka at all in any way, but that's very hard to do when you are all attached at the hip.)
Holy cow they really were just walking. ALL THAT TIME. No wonder Zhu Bajie was stirring the pot at any given opportunity. It was literally the only thing to do.
#jttw personal#how did they not kill each other#I was thinking about this while still picking at chapter 27#tripitaka was super gullible in that chapter in a sort of inexcusable way but also#it sooooort of makes sense when you think like#statistically#across the whole journey they could have gone moooonths between demons#years even#and suddenly sun wukong's claiming to have killed 3 (they didn't know it was the same demon) in a row in one morning?#even if tripitaka HAD believed him (or just harbored doubts) after the first one how likely was it the second was the case? or the THIRD?#obviously the evidence was in his face but couple the idea that their encounters with demons were actually SUPER rare#with the fact that tripitaka still had major trust issues with sun wukong from the fact he HAD trusted sun wukong previously#only to have that trust pretty solidly broken#and tripitaka's probably operating on a level of 'fool me once' hyper-vigilance against him that actually makes zhu bajie seem reasonable#I mean who are you going to trust? you and your own shitty judgement when you've already been wrong about the guy once before?#or the DEMON who probably knows more about DEMON MAGIC than you?#tripitaka's got TWO expert consults telling him two wildly opposing things but only ONE of them's seriously burned him in the past#(while the third expert consult and tie-breaker is notably abstaining. gdit sha wujing.)#anyway the characterization here is actually really good#tripitaka doesn't know the story framing - WE know something's up because otherwise we wouldn't have a story about it -#but tripitaka doesn't realize he's in a book#and I'm just saying tripitaka is being less foolish than the meta knowledge of being The Reader makes him seem#still a total brat though#he's definitely letting his own pride and hurt (and like...trauma) bias him against sun wukong unfairly#which is something he needs to work on and IS something that he pays for#(even with the bandits: expecting sun wukong to behave to tripitaka's standards of morality prior to TEACHING him those standards)#(wasn't fair. but also when he *tried* to address it sun wukong got angry and took off. and then tried to kill him. so.)#it's just interesting and whoever told this story originally was clearly putting a lot of thought into what it would be like#to actually be in these guys' shoes. Like ugh. HOW is this book so good?
11 notes · View notes
jakeperalta · 9 months ago
Text
in honour of grammys weekend being here, these are what I'm rooting for:
rolling up the welcome mat for best country album. probably a total long shot but I would literally sacrifice all my other hopes for this one to win
anti hero for song of the year (+ record of the year would be nice, but I'm mostly hoping for soty)
I think I'd like guts for album of the year, although obviously would be happy for it to go to midnights
noah kahan for best new artist
as usual, jack antonoff for producer of the year
ballad of a homeschooled girl for best rock song (I know nothing about rock I just think it would be fun for a song about being an awkward teenage girl to win this category)
in your love by tyler childers for best music video (also country song or country solo)
9 notes · View notes
savage-rhi · 3 months ago
Text
MAGENTA.
#look...our profs are the experts but even experts get things wrong even experts have biases even experts are not equipped#to handle certain situations#this person completely invalidated the complaints others in the cohort have had this term on profs grading with bias and not communicating#what they want to see on assignments not to mention there's evidence of favoritism#this is the kind of shit that lets counselors and therapists like my former supervisors get away with bullying clients and colleagues#because they're “experts” they get a pass on being assholes or acting holier than thou#as a peep who plans to specialize in trauma specific to clients receiving trauma from clinics and other practioners#im hella disappointed#just because you didnt experience anything negative doesnt negate the experiences of your peers#there is something going on obviously that deserves to be looked into#it doesnt mean that your cohort is saying “the profs dont know what they are talking about”#gtfo of here#i can admit right now i gotta work on not getting angry when theres an injustice done on others whose voices aren't being heard#and i naturally have an aversion to authority figures that i know isn't always appropriate which ive unpacked through trauma work#but man some of y'all need to work on not being kiss asses to people in positions of authority who should be questioned#especially in this fucking field!!!#if a prof clinician practioner etc etc cant handle having a conversation about behavior or clarification then wtf are they doing#working with vulnerable people???#magenta is my vent word#magenta is my vent tag#sorry peeps theres something in the air today#im normally not this mad#and hindsight i admit maybe im jumping the gun a little but when i heard this kind of shit#where concerns are being swept under the rug i get peeved af#im happy i took summer off#heres hoping fall is better
3 notes · View notes