#essential subjects on a national policy level

[rotzaprachim]

anyway the construct of the US as a monolingual anglophone nation is on multiple levels a white supremacist construct long before it is a reality

[tsscat]

.

[moleshow]

I am a stupid person. Where should I begin reading about economics.

where you should begin depends on what you want to know. my response is long so i'm putting it under a readmore

if you want to know about economic theory, that's one thing; if you want to know about economics in practice (i.e. the way economies operate), that's another. these things are related, but they're often in separate books.

if there's something you want to know about specifically feel free to ask--i may or may not be able to provide a suggestion on what you should read. my wheelhouse is mainly international economics and political economy so my recommendations are not the end-all-be-all of the field.

i've uploaded all of these here: https://gofile.io/d/gbocnf

(i wasn't able to find a pdf of the 2020 edition of the Frieden but i was able to find the 2017 edition.)

the first recommendation i have is unfortunately a textbook. theoretical foundations are important 😔

1. An Introduction to International Economics: New Perspectives on the World Economy by Kenneth Reinert

this book's focus is primarily on neoclassical economic theory (which is often what people mean when they say "economics"), but it provides a strong foundation for thinking about markets, trade, and currencies.

i also want to note here that economic theories are best thought of as lenses through which to look at phenomena. all of these lenses illuminate some things and obfuscate others. so the utility of a given theory is dependent upon what you're trying to examine.

2. The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy: An Economist Examines the Markets, Power, and Politics of World Trade by Pietra Rivoli

this book is a lot of fun, and falls pretty squarely into the "political economy" camp. Rivoli takes as her subject a t-shirt from a walgreens in florida (if memory serves), and follows the chain of production, to find out how it got there--as well as where shirts like it might go after being purchased. along the way she looks at the dynamics of production in practice, so she looks at the role of labor, firms, governments, brokers, etc.

i would recommend starting with this one or reading it alongside the Reinert so you aren't raw-dogging a textbook.

3. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century and Its Stumbles in the Twenty-First by Jeffry Frieden

for this one, you'll want to read the 2020 edition because the 2007 edition doesn't talk about the global financial crisis of 2008. this is a book that really is what it says on the tin--a history of global capitalism. it's particularly useful for understanding the origins and consequences of the postwar economic order. it contains some good discussions of keynesian economics and the neoliberal school of thought that followed.

4. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction by Immanuel Wallerstein

this one's not a crucial read, but it covers a different way of thinking about basic economic units in international economics (i.e. not limiting one's economic analysis to nation-state units but instead thinking about the global economy as a system).

5. Running Steel, Running America by Judith Stein

i've put this book here because the latter half of the book essentially goes through how and why american production changed in the latter half of the 20th century, focusing chiefly on the production of steel. (this is another political economy book.) Stein illustrates the consequences of US foreign policy for the domestic economy, particularly during the 1970s--a crucial period. the whole book is worth reading, but the first half deals more with labor and politics so it's not directly related to your question.

bonus: Politics and Economics in the 1970s - lecture by Judith Stein

feel free to reach out if you have more questions or need clarification on something here👍

[mariacallous]

In 2020, while the Covid-19 pandemic raged, a steadily growing epidemic continued to burn its path across the United States. Gun violence stole the lives of 45,222 Americans that fateful year, the worst year on record for gun deaths to that point.

The path leading to each one of these deaths is layered and complex. Each American killed by a bullet, each family grieving their loved one, deserves their own book. I never once thought that I would be one to write such a story.

I’m a gun-owning emergency physician, a father, and the cousin of a man who was shot to death. If it wasn’t for the National Rifle Association declaring in 2018 that physicians, like me, should “stay in their lane” and keep quiet about the toll of this plague, I wouldn’t have written about this subject. Yet gun violence consumes my life. I see victims of gun violence from family tragedies—children, adolescents, and adults—almost every day.

Addressing violence and death is the duty of anyone who has ever had to mend the wounds of a gunshot victim, to attempt heroic measures in the trauma bay, to meticulously care for the injured in the intensive care unit, or admit defeat in front of their loved ones. I have found no worse feeling than having to tell a mother or a father that their child has been killed by a bullet. We have practiced and perfected evidence-based medicine for decades. We should similarly practice evidence-based health policy. As it pertains to guns, some of that evidence already exists.

As a physician, I understand the limitations of science. The best research, at least in the biomedical sphere, usually requires the findings of randomized clinical trials, but running those for policymaking often isn’t feasible. In public health, the next best option is a natural experiment, in which one jurisdiction implements a policy and a similar, nearby jurisdiction does not, and policy makers can observe the difference.

The RAND Corporation’s The Science of Gun Policy—a synthesis of research into US gun policy—typically relies on these types of studies to inform its analysis. It is sometimes inconclusive, sometimes weak, sometimes strong in its assertions about the impacts of various policies that might impact lives in this epidemic of gun violence, but overall its analysis describes myriad policy levers that our current lawmakers could, and in my opinion should, swiftly implement at the federal, state, and local levels. The evidence states that we can save lives through the following:

Background checks through federal firearms licensed dealers for every firearms purchase

Licenses and permits for individuals who want to buy guns

Raising the minimum age for all firearm purchases to 21

Strong child access prevention laws

Brief waiting periods

Domestic violence restraining orders that require the relinquishing of existing firearms.

But I also believe there are two additional laws that should be repealed. Their presence in society should alarm physicians, advocates, and the people who write the laws.

Policy Prescription #1: Reverse Stand-Your-Ground Laws

On February 26, 2012, Trayvon Martin, a Black kid my height and with a similar build, was walking through a neighborhood in Sanford, Florida, after purchasing a bag of Skittles and a drink. He was essentially stalked by the captain of a local neighborhood watch patrol. Following an altercation—one that a 911 dispatcher urged the overly zealous neighborhood watchman to avoid—Martin lay on the ground, shot dead by a single bullet that traversed his heart and lung.

All of that young man’s hopes and dreams of one day becoming an aviator were struck down by a man who would eventually be acquitted of murder because of Florida’s stand-your-ground statute that created a culture of approach, provoke, and kill. Stand your ground certainly contributed to the young boy’s death.

Every state has some form of this doctrine embedded in common law, something that recognizes that an American man or woman inside their home has the right to defend themselves. But how far does that right travel outside the home? Obviously, if someone approached you attempting to harm you, no one would blame you for defending yourself. But what happens when you initiate the incident and instead of retreating, escalate a situation that never needed to exist in the first place?

The castle doctrine permits a person who is in his or her home to defend it and themselves from harm without any duty to retreat to safety. But a duty to retreat when in public exists in many states. Ohio, Wisconsin, and North Dakota, however, extend the castle doctrine to one’s personal vehicle. In some locations, largely in the South, this doctrine extends to anyplace a person has a legal right to be. Vermont and Washington, DC, remain the only two jurisdictions where a duty to retreat remains supreme.

Stand-your-ground laws clearly increase the risk of homicides, specifically firearm homicides, and have no beneficial impacts on other forms of violent crime, suggesting that these laws have not lived up to their purported deterrent effect. Lawmakers should repeal them and revert to a more limited use of the castle doctrine to prevent the deaths of their constituents.

Policy Prescription #2: Concealed Carry Laws Should Adhere to the ‘May-Issue’ Standard

Concealed carry rights are nearly universal, although 23 states and the District of Columbia require a permit to do so as of 2023. The other 27 states do not require a permit, and individuals there can concealed-carry without any form of vetting.

Concealed carry laws differ in several distinct ways, ranging in order of least to most restrictive, from permitless carry to shall-issue to may-issue laws. Among the states that require a permit for someone to carry a concealed weapon, the permitting entity, often law enforcement, must issue it to anyone who meets minimum standards in shall-issue states. In may-issue states, there is some additional leeway for law enforcement to prevent issuing a permit to people who might be a threat to themselves or others, even if they otherwise would be eligible.

Shouldn’t a small-town sheriff who knows his community well have some discretion when reviewing applications? What if there was a violent man in that community who has been drinking when he walks through the door and who, in anger, strikes his wife repeatedly, but each time the cops come out for a domestic disturbance they are told that she simply fell down the stairs? If that man applied for a concealed carry license in a shall-issue state, he would easily receive it. In a may-issue state, the sheriff might wisely reject the application and potentially save the life of that man’s wife.

Lonny Pulkrabek, a Jefferson County sheriff who laments that his state legislature voted to make Iowa a shall-issue state in 2011, no longer has any discretion when issuing a concealed carry permit. He reported that in 2018, “I’ve already got 140 people through May that have criminal records that have permits, that were issued permits to carry. We’ve seen a lot more people with lengthy criminal histories who in fact are willing to go through and jump through the hoops and get the permit to carry it legally.”

Sheriff Pulkrabek maintains a “wall of shame” of the several hundred concealed carry permits he has been forced to issue to Iowans with criminal records because the state elected to follow an inferior law over a decade ago. Researchers, utilizing the natural experiment set by the various policies in force in different states, have detected differences between states with divergent legal frameworks as they pertain to concealed carry. The Science of Gun Policy indicates that shall-issue laws, such as Iowa’s, may increase overall violent crime compared to may-issue laws. Based on the underlying research, scientists estimate that in 10 years following a transition to the more permissive type of concealed carry law, violent crime increases by up to 15 percent.

Since concealed carry laws have been shown to increase violent crime, shouldn’t we have some say about who walks around town with a hidden firearm? Unfortunately, many state legislatures haven’t been following the science. Iowa recently went even farther afield, along with Tennessee and Texas, by weakening their laws to allow for permitless carry beginning in the summer of 2021. I worry that it will lead to more crime and more bloodshed.

In the Covid pandemic, the average American learned what public health can and cannot do. We’ve witnessed the scientific method unfold before our eyes as we waited for vaccines and treatments to be created in record time. Just as public health measures—such as staying at home in the early phases of the Covid crisis, wearing masks once society began to open, and vaccination—tamed this most recent pandemic, I have faith that science can do the same thing for endemic gun violence in America.

The science compiled by the RAND Corporation suggests a series of potential legislative approaches that will save the lives of some of the over 45,000 Americans who die by firearms each year. We cannot eliminate every injury, every death, or every shooting, but we must recognize that we can positively impact our fellow Americans, save lives, and relieve suffering by implementing some very simple laws that I describe.

Adapted from Under the Gun: An ER Doctor's Cure for America's Gun Epidemic, by Cedric Dark, MD, MPH, with Seema Yasmin. Copyright 2024. Published with permission of Johns Hopkins University Press.

[ncs-swiss]

Formal Communiqué From: European Union To: Swiss National Council Subject: Switzerland’s Approach to EU Accession and Adherence to EU Legal Frameworks

Date: December 11, 2024

Honourable Members of the National Council of Switzerland,

The European Union (EU) recognizes Switzerland as a valued partner and close neighbor with a long-standing tradition of collaboration, mutual respect, and shared values. Your continued interest in closer association with the EU is a testament to our intertwined histories and economic interdependence.

However, the European Union wishes to express its unequivocal position regarding the foundational principles that underpin accession and integration into our union. The EU’s legal and regulatory framework, including cornerstone legislation such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), reflects a unified vision of governance, economic cooperation, and respect for fundamental rights that all member states adhere to without reservation.

The EU has observed certain discussions and proposals from Swiss policymakers suggesting an intent to selectively adopt or alter key elements of EU law to accommodate domestic preferences. While the EU appreciates the unique characteristics of each member state and recognizes the importance of national contexts, selective application or “cherry-picking” of laws undermines the integrity and coherence of our Union.

Accession to the EU necessitates full alignment with the EU acquis—the body of rights and obligations binding all member states. Laws such as the GDPR are not merely administrative or sectoral policies but are essential to the single market, ensuring trust, security, and competitiveness in an increasingly digital world. Unilateral deviations from such laws would compromise the principles of equality and fairness that underpin the Union.

In light of this, the European Union wishes to make clear that: 1. Priority for Accession: Switzerland will not be afforded priority or accelerated pathways for EU accession if it seeks to adopt a selective or modified approach to EU laws. The EU’s legal framework must be embraced in its entirety, ensuring a level playing field for all member states. 2. Negotiation Preconditions: Any discussions on accession or deeper integration will be contingent on Switzerland’s demonstrated commitment to aligning fully with EU legislation, including GDPR, without unilateral alterations. 3. Institutional Framework: Switzerland must accept the jurisdiction of EU bodies, including the European Court of Justice, in matters of legal interpretation and dispute resolution relating to EU law.

The EU remains open to dialogue and is committed to fostering a constructive partnership. However, we urge the Swiss National Council to align its approach with the principles of mutual trust and shared responsibility that define EU membership.

We look forward to continued cooperation and hope for meaningful progress in discussions that honor the spirit of unity and collective purpose.

Yours sincerely,

Mr. Petros Mavromichalis Ambassador of the European Union to Switzerland European Union Headquarters

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

what the world looks like on Dec 27

For some reason the "Biden Is Doing A Great Job" crowd is trotting out in force today, lord knows why; Politico, MSNBC and Washington Post are all carrying editorials from Democratic "strategists" explaining why Democrats are going to win in '24.

It's probably a good way to enframe the issues of the day.

Start with MSNBC's, I guess. Simon Rosenberg argues from fairly persuasive general observations that the trend towards increasing liberal populism creates a new kind of 'silent majority' (these are my words, not his) in the past two decades. The tell is election outcomes at the Federal level; Democrats have won a historically unprecedented number of them, regardless of how much noise we make about Republican resurgence in these times.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/biden-2024-election-polls-strong-rcna130507?cid=eml_mda_20231227&user_email=587504d38113b0b55701d435b17a018c44c6e464cd919efb5465ffcb40e1a742

Marc Thiessen in the Washington Post, somewhat inexplicably (what, was there a White House press office email blast I missed?) goes much more granular in his Biden-boosting. His top achievements list is entirely foreign policy and includes two items about China (the Replicator initiative and standing up on human rights); and the top two achievements on his list are Israel and Ukraine.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/12/27/biden-best-policy-actions-2023/

It should be noted, this is somewhat Thiessen & Rosenberg in the act of (pardon me) blowing sunshine up people's asses. The last major poll of American foreign policy approval from NBC News polling in late November shows consistently low approval ratings for Biden's handling of Israel, in particular with younger voters (i.e., Gen Z). You might recall some of the edges of the discussion this kicked off; this is why Gen Z and Chinese censorship on Tik-Tok turned into a slightly big deal.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/poll-bidens-standing-hits-new-lows-israel-hamas-war-rcna125251

I can't imagine it's gotten much better since the hostage-exchange ceasefire ended. And, yes, if you didn't know, ByteDance censors and pushes China-friendly content on Tik-Tok.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tiktoks-content-political-subjects-aligns-chinese-government-study-say-rcna130448

Meanwhile, Biden quietly signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law on Friday.

It's not getting a lot of attention, but the way that the bill was crafted demonstrates that it's pretty clearly still Senate Democrats & Biden in charge of the agenda; this is why Tuberville's abortion-travel-reimbursement ban was dropped. Republicans got largely nonsensical inclusions - no DEI and no pride flags in the military I guess? (which doesn't seem to stop troops from displaying it themselves), which sort of seems to signal the way of things lately.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/22/biden-defense-bill-spying-program-00133124

As unpopular as Democratic foreign policy seems to be, the fact remains, it's the most realistic option on the table since Republicans have regressed to Trumpist isolationism and nativist "border invasion!!!" hysteria. It looks like Democrats actually have substantive legislative accomplishments to claim; Republicans have posturing and lifestyle policing they've tried to inject into Democratic accomplishments.

Really, if you go in-depth on what Republicans have actually done, not just postured about, there's some real work going on there. There are people lining up for POTUS in 2028 who are doing this; but it's largely on bipartisan causes, not party-line Republican causes, because, again, party-line Republican ones are essentially "Trump Iz Great", "Gayz R Bad" and "Legislate That Uterus!" (and, also, "Immigrants Terk Mah Jerb Derp De Der"). The number of Republicans who actually want to do things, and not virtue-signal, is probably around 11%; you could see the people who are uniting behind Haley as a kind of proxy or indicator for people looking for an alternative to Trump right now.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/1226/who-is-winning-2028-presidential-election-00133119

Zooming in on foreign policy and defense news for today, a few slightly eyebrow-raising headlines are out there if you look.

Start with NYT's slightly surprising exposé of the MSS, China's spy agency (which, did you even know that was what China's spy agency was called? yeah, good job China).

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/us/politics/china-cia-spy-mss.html

On the Ukraine front, Politico cites an anonymous Biden administration official stating that Biden's policy on Ukraine is shifting; they're pushing Ukraine for a negotiated outcome instead of a total expulsion of Russian forces and a return to historical borders (the '90s, or 2014). I'm expecting pushback on that from the Ukraine think tank and European partner-nation scene; the obvious objection here is that it's just rewarding Russia for aggressing on Ukraine, and the situation in Russia is fluid; the way I see it, given what we saw from the Wagner insurrection and the state of Russian troop mobilization (not great, it never is), there's room for Russia to lose as much as there is for Ukraine to win.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/27/biden-endgame-ukraine-00133211

Meanwhile, Ukraine's stolen children are getting another round of light shined on them; The New York Times is running a feature on them. And it's hard not to seem ungrateful, but... I can't help but wish that more people had been raising awareness of this, this entire time, because, again, it's children stolen from a war zone in full view of the world and Russia doesn't even lie about it, they just front like it's legitimate.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/12/26/world/europe/ukraine-war-children-russia.html

In domestic-political news, the latest sign of the massive upheaval of American life caused by the end of Roe v. Wade and the post-Dobbs era of reproductive rights is a Black woman in Ohio charged after miscarrying in her bathroom. Ohio just passed abortion rights protections last month; activists from all over the country mobilized around their referendum actually. This makes the Ohio case particularly noteworthy; at stake is whether criminalizing miscarriage can still work in an environment like Ohio or post-Dobbs America generally.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/black-woman-ohio-was-charged-miscarrying-bathroom-experts-warn-dangero-rcna130649

Other notable stories that don't fit:

Gun reform is doable now, according to Washington Post interviews with Sens. Michael F. Bennet (D-Colo.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Angus King (I-Maine) and Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), all of whom previously voted against gun control after Sandy Hook.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2023/assault-weapons-ban-debate-gun-control-ar-15-mass-shootings/

Washington Post has a documentary on the Discord Leaks, which is... fun, that's fun (unless you're in intelligence, in which case, it's very not-fun). Call it a "your tax dollars at work" story; also, fun fact, Egypt wanted to arm Russia in early '22, so... what the hell, Egypt.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/12/11/discord-leaks-documentary/

Jack Smith's team is arguing Trump shouldn't be able to use his trial as a platform for spreading disinformation, which is a very, very interesting argument to someone who mines court documents for proven disinformation (like me!).

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/27/politics/trump-courtroom-special-counsel-election-subversion?cid=ios_app

Stephen Miller is awful, which you knew, and running a fairly obvious influence op using America First Legal and some surprisingly bad lawfare; the tell here is, AFL spends more on ads than the entire ACLU despite being a fraction of its size. It spends about 10% of its entire budget on actual lawsuits. Thanks TNR for putting this back up in front of people's eyes, I guess.

[Joohn Choe]

[beardedmrbean]

TORONTO (AP) — Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday that the country will significantly reduce the number of new immigrants it allows into the country after acknowledging that his government failed to get the balance right coming out of the pandemic.

Trudeau's Liberal government was criticized for its plan to allow 500,000 new permanent residents into the country in each of the next two years. On Thursday, he said next year’s target will now be 395,000 new permanent residents and that the figure will drop to 380,000 in 2026 and 365,000 in 2027.

“In the tumultuous times as we emerged from the pandemic, between addressing labor needs and maintaining population growth, we didn't get the balance right,” Trudeau said.

“Immigration is essential for Canada's future, but it must be controlled and it must be sustainable.”

Trudeau, who is facing calls from within his own party not to seek a fourth term, has endured mounting criticism over his immigration policies and the negative impact that population growth has had on housing affordability.

He said his government will reduce the number of immigrants Canada brings in over the next three years, and that this will freeze population growth over the next two years. Canada reached 41 million people in April. The population was 37.5 million in 2019.

Trudeau said Canada needs to stabilize its population growth to allow all levels of government to make necessary changes to health care, housing and social services so that it can accommodate more people in the future.

Immigration Minister Marc Miller said the lower immigration numbers will help with the country's housing shortage.

He also acknowledged the change in public opinion about immigration.

“That volume that we have put forward is of concern,” Miller said.

Miller said the government sees the pressures facing Canadians, and that it must must adapt its policies accordingly. He said government leaders have listened and will continue to protect the integrity of the immigration system and grow Canada's population responsibly.

“We are an open country, but not everyone can come to this country,” he said, noting that Canada will continue to welcome outsiders and that the government's immigration targets remain ambitious.

Trudeau's government has long touted Canada's immigration policy and how Canada is better than peer countries in welcoming newcomers and integrating them into the economy.

Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the opposition Conservative Party, accused Trudeau of destroying the national consensus on immigration.

“He has destroyed our immigration system through his own personal incompetence and destroyed 150 years of common sense consensus with the Liberals and Conservatives on that subject," Poilievre said.

“He cannot fix what he broke on immigration and housing or anything else because he is busy fighting his own caucus,” he added.

Poilievre was referring to calls by some lawmakers from Trudeau's own party to not run for a fourth term. Those calls represent one of the biggest tests of Trudeau's political career, but he said Thursday that he intends to stay on through the next election.

Nelson Wiseman, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Toronto, said the Trudeau government messed up badly on immigration.

"The government’s logic — to grow the economy and sustain an aging Canadian population by bringing in more young immigrants — was sound. But Ottawa has little control over meeting the housing, health, education, and other welfare needs of residents, whether they are citizens or immigrants,” Wiseman said.

"These are all provincial government responsibilities, and there was little cooperation or coordination between the two levels of government," he said.

A certain percentage of Canadians have always been xenophobic, but much less so than in some other countries, Wiseman said.

“Many Canadians have turned against the recent growing immigrant and temporary worker/student influx because of the growing housing, health, education, and other welfare challenges. Ottawa has read the polls and is responding according," he said.

[unpluggedfinancial]

Bitcoin Going Parabolic: A Closer Look at the Factors Driving the Surge

Bitcoin has been a subject of fascination and debate for over a decade. Recently, the buzz around its potential parabolic rise has reached new heights. With multiple presidential nominees proposing to make Bitcoin a strategic reserve asset and groundbreaking legislative efforts, the cryptocurrency is poised for a significant breakthrough. In this blog post, we will explore the factors contributing to Bitcoin's potential meteoric rise and what this could mean for the future of finance.

Current Market Overview

The Bitcoin market has seen remarkable stability and growth over the past year. Despite global economic uncertainties, Bitcoin's price has maintained an upward trajectory, driven by increased adoption and growing institutional interest. The market's resilience has only strengthened the belief that Bitcoin is here to stay.

Factors Driving Bitcoin's Potential Parabolic Rise

Institutional Adoption Institutional investment in Bitcoin has been one of the most significant drivers of its price surge. Companies like MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Square have made substantial Bitcoin purchases, demonstrating their confidence in its long-term value. Recently, MicroStrategy announced plans to raise $2 billion to buy more Bitcoin, adding to its already significant holdings of 226,500 BTC. This move exemplifies the growing trend of institutions recognizing Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and economic instability.

Regulatory Developments Positive regulatory changes are also contributing to Bitcoin's upward momentum. Notably, several presidential nominees in the upcoming election have expressed their support for Bitcoin, proposing to make it a strategic reserve asset for the United States. Additionally, Senator Cynthia Lummis has introduced a groundbreaking bill to establish a U.S. Bitcoin reserve. This legislation aims to treat Bitcoin like gold or oil, strengthening the country's economy and positioning Bitcoin as a permanent national asset. Such initiatives could legitimize Bitcoin on a national level, potentially triggering a wave of similar actions from other countries.

Monetary Policy Shifts The Federal Reserve is expected to cut interest rates in September, a move that historically leads to Bitcoin price pumps. Lower interest rates often result in increased liquidity in the financial system, driving investors to seek alternative stores of value like Bitcoin. Moreover, the global M2 money supply is skyrocketing, indicating a significant increase in the amount of money in circulation. This surge in money supply can lead to inflation, further underscoring the appeal of Bitcoin as a deflationary asset.

Technological Advancements Bitcoin's underlying technology continues to evolve, enhancing its security, efficiency, and scalability. Innovations such as the Lightning Network and Taproot upgrade are making Bitcoin transactions faster and more cost-effective, further cementing its position as a superior financial instrument.

Historical Parabolic Trends in Bitcoin

Bitcoin's history is marked by several parabolic rises, each driven by different factors but sharing common themes of increased adoption and market maturation. The 2017 bull run, fueled by retail investor interest, and the 2020-2021 surge, driven by institutional adoption, provide valuable insights into the current trend. Studying these patterns helps us understand the potential trajectory of Bitcoin's price movement.

Expert Predictions and Analysis

Experts in the field of cryptocurrency are making bold predictions about Bitcoin's future. Influential figures like Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy, and Cathie Wood, CEO of ARK Invest, have forecasted Bitcoin reaching new all-time highs. Their analyses are based on Bitcoin's scarcity, growing adoption, and its role as digital gold.

Potential Challenges and Risks

While the outlook for Bitcoin is promising, it is essential to acknowledge the potential challenges and risks. Regulatory hurdles, market volatility, and technological vulnerabilities could impact Bitcoin's growth. Investors must remain vigilant and informed to navigate these challenges effectively.

Conclusion

Bitcoin's potential to go parabolic is underpinned by strong institutional support, favorable regulatory developments, and continuous technological advancements. As multiple presidential nominees propose to make Bitcoin a strategic reserve asset and Senator Lummis's groundbreaking bill aims to establish a U.S. Bitcoin reserve, the stage is set for a significant transformation in the financial landscape. With MicroStrategy's aggressive strategy to raise $2 billion for more Bitcoin purchases and the expected interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, the momentum is undeniable. Additionally, the skyrocketing global M2 money supply highlights the growing need for a deflationary asset like Bitcoin. Whether you're an investor, a crypto enthusiast, or a curious observer, staying informed about these developments is crucial as we witness the evolution of Bitcoin.

Take Action Towards Financial Independence

If this article has sparked your interest in the transformative potential of Bitcoin, there's so much more to explore! Dive deeper into the world of financial independence and revolutionize your understanding of money by following my blog and subscribing to my YouTube channel.

🌐 Blog: Unplugged Financial Blog Stay updated with insightful articles, detailed analyses, and practical advice on navigating the evolving financial landscape. Learn about the history of money, the flaws in our current financial systems, and how Bitcoin can offer a path to a more secure and independent financial future.

📺 YouTube Channel: Unplugged Financial Subscribe to our YouTube channel for engaging video content that breaks down complex financial topics into easy-to-understand segments. From in-depth discussions on monetary policies to the latest trends in cryptocurrency, our videos will equip you with the knowledge you need to make informed financial decisions.

👍 Like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell to stay updated with our latest content. Whether you're a seasoned investor, a curious newcomer, or someone concerned about the future of your financial health, our community is here to support you on your journey to financial independence.

[worldofwardcraft]

The bad example state.

April 25, 2024

In his State of the State Address in January 2022, Governor Ron DeSantis declared that Florida was "the freest state in these United States." He also claimed "the state is well-prepared to withstand future economic turmoil." Turns out this description does not apply at all to his state's insurance industry. That particular segment of Florida's economy is currently verging on catastrophe.

Because of ocean warming, Florida is especially subject to heavy rainfalls, storm surge, and major category hurricanes that can devastate entire cities. For example, 55% of all the properties in Miami are at risk for severe flooding. And Florida's sea level, as much as eight inches higher now than in 1950, is rising by one inch every three years.

Bloomberg Intelligence reports that a 360% rise in Florida's insured losses in the past three decades due to the increased frequency and intensity of natural disasters is causing insurers to “hike premiums and exit high-risk areas.” And with reinsurance — essentially insurance for insurers — becoming unaffordable, major insurance companies are fleeing Florida in droves. AIG ceased insuring new properties along Florida's shoreline, while Farmers Group has stopped writing new policies statewide entirely.

So, since Republicans believe a "free" state means having little to no business regulation, homeowners are left having to depend on companies that are smaller, less diversified, less capitalized and more prone to becoming insolvent. A recent study by researchers at Harvard University, Columbia University and the Federal Reserve found that a majority of homes in Florida are insured by companies whose ratings would not receive an A from Demotech Inc., the industry’s primary ratings agency, and thus not be good enough to secure full backing by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Naturally, costs for home insurance have skyrocketed, too. Floridians paid an average annual premium of $10,996 in 2023 — more than anywhere else in the country. And online insurance agent Insurify predicts that number to go up to $11,759 in 2024.

DeSantis likes to hype "free" Florida as a model for the nation. Here's how Latisha Nixon-Jones, law professor at Jackson State University responds to that notion:

Will the state serve as a blueprint for disaster-prone regions, or act as a cautionary tale? After all, states such as California and Louisiana have also seen insurance companies withdrawing from their markets.

Plus, Newsweek reports that Brookfield Asset Management Reinsurance Partnership is pulling out of nine states: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Washington. If Florida is an example for America, that's not very reassuring.

[nexility-sims]

do your sims have their own personal social media accounts? are they private for only close friends or are they public?

this is such a fun question ! the short answer is that they do indeed have personal social media accounts. all of the working royals have public accounts, and they can have private ones unless otherwise prohibited. long answer is an essay entitled "Social Media, Celebrity Culture, and Royal Relevance in Contemporary Uspana" :^)

kidding, but it is a wall of text:

social media is not really a subset of public relations for the royal family—like, it is, but it's also its own entity. there are certainly public accounts that are maintained principally by employees of the crown, but my sense is that they would've had an entire strategic plan for Influencing™ in the early 2010s when it was solidifying as a concept. the crown, as a governmental institution, has had its own approach to social media since perhaps 2006-2008 primarily concerned with policy communication and public engagement. the royal family, as a sort of related cultural apparatus, attends to the popular interests of performance and spectacle—different kinds of persuasion.

this makes sense in the broader context of beatriz's personal vision of how their family remains relevant: she had already made the decision to lean hard into the wave of celebrity and entertainment journalism that came to shape, then define, the 1990s and 2000s. part of it was her willingness to engage with outlets less deferential to the crown—whether as an appreciator of tabloid gossip's function in society or as a private participant in the kind of combative exchanges that maintain popular public interest. part of it was having the foresight to exploit the adventures and popularity of her many grandchildren: there are ten of them, and they all came of age in the 1990s and 2000s; they all appealed to different swaths of the public; and they surrounded themselves with other interesting figures who'd be in the news with or without the royal association. entertainment becomes a public service, alongside but separate from the royal family's substantive patronage system.

in short, beatriz has been a real "all publicity is good publicity" kind of person, and that has shaped both the crown's official strategies and the family's approach to self-presentation. the latter has been thoroughly central to celebrity culture for some time and that has included appropriating social media for their own purposes. social media allows a new level of control for people who had previously been subject to processes controlled by newspaper and magazine editors, television producers, and a cadre of popular bloggers. with the advent and maturity of social media, the celebrity mystique seems to be a relic of the past, but parasocial interactions have taken on a new, powerful shape. the active use of social media by the family, then, is a way to compete with mediated press coverage and maintain their place in the broader national celebrity culture.

while beatriz herself does not maintain any private accounts or have much interest in participating in the management of her public one, it is essentially imperative that the family's working royals have public accounts with regular, personalized posts. they have staff for this who are separate from staff working on other forms of communications. the actual shape of these public accounts depends on the person. take barbie, for example: the social media mandate, for her, is fully a call to influence. her public account is personal the way lifestyle accounts tend to be; she's presenting her life, her marriage, and her children in a manner that is, not attainable, but unprecedentedly accessible. as another example, i imagine arnaut's social media presence is sort of like barack obama's has been. he and his team make statement posts about issues and current events, and he also releases reading lists and year-end playlists and things like that. leonor's posts tend to be polished, professional, and work-related, but she also posts videos of herself discussing events while she's getting ready for them.

the question of private personal accounts is interesting ... i imagine the younger members of the family do have them, although that raises the question of whether they're being monitored and moderated to prevent or manage leaks, etc. at the same time, they have such broad latitude with their public accounts that i don't imagine they'd need private accounts to post the kinds of content most people put on instagram and such. in theory, i feel like there's an approval process that means adults have to consent to having their accounts monitored and, for minors, puts the monitoring responsibility on their parents. julian, for example, has private personal accounts he uses exclusively to keep up with what his son is posting. obviously the teens would all have private snapchat accounts, but why would you make a finsta for fucking around if you're contractually obligated to have your dad follow it ksdjfhsg

i don't think i've really posted any social media content, except for the barbie and german ones that i decided to frame as instagram stories, but ... this is what's happening in the background. i mean, obviously, since the story proper is still in the 1930s when mass media is still in its infancy. i do want to depict the early roots of this in the leonor-centric spinoff which, as we know, is set in the 1990s. she's the test case for the type of attention that becomes trained on her younger cousins, and all of their children are the digital native zoomer generation grappling with what comes next for technology and celebrity in society. exciting stuff.

[socsteeel]

Understanding Steel Rate Today: Key Insights and Market Dynamics

Steel is a crucial material in the global economy, with applications spanning across construction, manufacturing, automotive, and infrastructure sectors. As a versatile and essential resource, the price of steel plays a critical role in shaping the costs of various industries. Steel rates today are influenced by a combination of global trends, local supply and demand, raw material prices, and geopolitical factors. In this article, we will explore the current steel rate trends, the key factors driving fluctuations in prices, and the impact of steel price changes on industries worldwide.

Current Steel Rate Trends: A Snapshot

Steel rates fluctuate daily, impacted by various internal and external factors. In India, the price of steel products like TMT bars, HR coils, and MS plates can range from ₹45,000 to ₹75,000 per ton, depending on the product type, region, and quality. These variations are influenced by both domestic factors and international market conditions.

In recent years, steel prices have been volatile, primarily due to disruptions in global supply chains and shifts in demand, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. The recovery of infrastructure and construction sectors, along with the increasing cost of raw materials, continues to keep steel prices at elevated levels. With both domestic and international factors at play, steel rates remain dynamic and subject to change.

Key Drivers of Steel Price Fluctuations

Steel prices are not determined by a single factor but are influenced by a combination of variables. Understanding these key drivers can help businesses navigate the complex steel market and make informed purchasing decisions.

1. Raw Material Costs

The primary raw materials for steel production—iron ore and coking coal—directly affect the final price of steel. Any increase in the costs of these materials leads to higher steel prices. Global supply chain disruptions, mining regulations, and natural disasters can create price hikes for raw materials, which are then passed on to steel producers like Jindal Steel and Tata Steel, ultimately impacting the end-user price.

2. Demand and Supply Dynamics

The law of supply and demand is one of the most significant factors influencing steel prices. An increase in demand, particularly in the construction and infrastructure sectors, pushes steel prices higher. On the other hand, when demand slows down due to economic downturns or reduced industrial activity, steel prices tend to soften.

In India, government initiatives like the National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP), the Smart Cities project, and the Make in India campaign have contributed to an increased demand for steel, keeping prices steady or even increasing them during periods of high demand.

3. Energy Prices

Steel production is an energy-intensive process, and fluctuations in energy costs—especially electricity and natural gas—have a direct impact on steel prices. When energy prices rise due to inflation or geopolitical tensions, production costs for steel manufacturers also rise, which can push steel prices upward.

4. Geopolitical and Trade Policies

Global events and trade policies play a significant role in shaping steel prices. For instance, trade wars, tariffs, and sanctions can disrupt the global steel trade and lead to price fluctuations. Recent tensions between major steel-producing countries, such as the trade conflict between the U.S. and China or the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, have caused disruptions in the global supply chain, further impacting steel prices.

5. Currency Exchange Rates

Since steel is a globally traded commodity, currency fluctuations also affect steel prices. A weaker domestic currency against major currencies like the U.S. Dollar or Euro can lead to higher costs for imported raw materials and steel products, thus driving up the overall price of steel in the local market.

How Steel Price Changes Impact Industries

Fluctuations in steel prices have a significant impact on industries that rely heavily on steel for their operations. The construction, automotive, and manufacturing sectors, in particular, are sensitive to steel price changes. Here’s how steel price fluctuations can affect these industries:

Construction Industry

Steel is an essential material in construction, particularly for reinforcement in concrete. As steel prices rise, the overall cost of construction materials increases, leading to higher construction costs. Builders and developers may face increased project costs, which can ultimately be passed on to consumers. This rise in construction costs can slow down demand for housing and infrastructure projects, potentially delaying or postponing construction timelines.

Automotive Industry

Steel is a primary component in automobile manufacturing. Rising steel prices can lead to higher production costs for car manufacturers. Automakers may absorb these increased costs or pass them on to consumers in the form of higher vehicle prices. Either way, steel price hikes can affect the overall cost structure of the automotive industry.

Consumer Goods Manufacturing

The cost of consumer goods, including household appliances and electronics, is also influenced by steel prices. Manufacturers of goods such as refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners rely on steel for components like casings and structural parts. An increase in steel prices results in higher manufacturing costs, which can lead to price hikes for end consumers, influencing consumer spending behavior.

Outlook for Steel Prices

Looking ahead, steel prices are expected to remain volatile, influenced by factors such as global economic recovery, raw material costs, energy prices, and geopolitical events. As infrastructure projects continue to drive steel demand, prices are likely to stay elevated in the near term. However, advancements in steel production technology, such as the use of electric arc furnaces and sustainable steelmaking practices, may help stabilize prices in the long run.

Additionally, as the world focuses on reducing carbon emissions and adopting eco-friendly production methods, steel manufacturers may face new challenges and opportunities that could influence pricing trends.

Conclusion: Stay Informed About Steel Rates

Steel rates today are subject to a wide range of factors, both global and local. For industries reliant on steel, understanding the dynamics that drive price fluctuations is essential for effective procurement and budgeting. Whether you’re involved in construction, manufacturing, or automotive industries, staying informed about the latest steel price trends can help you plan your projects and manage costs more efficiently.

For the most up-to-date information on steel rates and to secure competitive pricing on high-quality steel products, visit www.steeloncall.com or contact us at 18008332929. Our expert team is here to support your steel purchasing needs.

#SteelPriceTrends #ConstructionIndustry #SteelDemand

[yamuna111]

How to Ace Your Bank Exams with Coimbatore's Best Coaching Center: Expert Tips and Strategies

The competition in bank exams has intensified in recent years, with thousands of aspirants vying for limited positions in prestigious nationalized banks. To stand out, you need more than just hard work – you need the right strategies and guidance. If you’re preparing for bank exams and are looking for a structured approach, joining the bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore can be a game changer. In this post, we’ll dive into actionable tips and strategies to help you ace your exams with the help of the best coaching centers in Coimbatore.

Why Choose a Bank Exam Coaching Center in Coimbatore?

Coimbatore is rapidly gaining recognition as a hub for educational excellence, particularly when it comes to competitive exams. The city hosts numerous bank exam coaching centers in Coimbatore that offer expert guidance and resources tailored to help you succeed. These coaching centers provide:

Personalized attention: With small batch sizes, trainers can focus on individual progress.

Comprehensive study material: Access to the latest books, mock tests, and question banks.

Experienced faculty: Learn from educators who have themselves excelled in bank exams and have years of teaching experience.

Joining the right coaching center can give you a competitive edge, providing a roadmap to your success.

1. Understand the Exam Pattern and Syllabus

Before you dive into your studies, it's essential to thoroughly understand the exam pattern and syllabus of the bank exams. The bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore will guide you in breaking down the syllabus into manageable sections, focusing on key topics that frequently appear in exams.

Key Exam Sections:

Reasoning Ability

Quantitative Aptitude

English Language

General Awareness

Computer Knowledge

By understanding the structure and difficulty level of each section, you can tailor your study strategy accordingly.

2. Time Management is Key

Bank exams require not only knowledge but also efficient time management. The most common mistake candidates make is spending too much time on one question and losing valuable minutes. Here’s where coaching centers play a pivotal role. Through mock tests and time-bound practice sessions, you’ll learn how to manage your time effectively during the exam.

Tips for Time Management:

Set time limits for each section.

Practice mock exams under timed conditions to simulate the actual test.

Prioritize easier questions first, then move on to more complex ones.

3. Practice with Mock Tests and Previous Year Papers

No amount of theory can replace the value of practice. Regular mock tests are critical for improving speed and accuracy. A bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore offers access to a wide range of mock tests and previous year papers that help familiarize you with the exam format and question types.

Mock tests also serve as a diagnostic tool, highlighting your strengths and areas of improvement. By analyzing your performance after each mock test, you can adjust your study plan accordingly.

4. Stay Updated with Current Affairs

For any bank exam, especially those with a General Awareness section, staying updated on current affairs is crucial. Your bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore will help you access current affairs resources, including daily updates and weekly quizzes, to ensure you're well-prepared.

Key Areas to Focus On:

National and international news

Economic and financial news

Government schemes and policies

Banking and finance updates

A good grasp of current affairs will help you score better in this section and give you an edge over others.

5. Focus on Strong Foundations

While it’s important to practice, a strong foundation in basic concepts is essential for cracking the exam. Spend time strengthening your basics in subjects like mathematics, reasoning, and English. Understanding the fundamentals will help you tackle more complex questions with confidence.

Real-World Example: Success Story of a Coimbatore Student

Take the example of Rajesh, a student from Coimbatore who aced the IBPS PO exam after enrolling in one of the leading bank exam coaching centers in Coimbatore. Rajesh dedicated 3 months to focused preparation with the help of expert trainers and mock test sessions. By following a well-structured study plan, practicing with time-bound tests, and staying updated with current affairs, he was able to secure a top score and land his dream job at a national bank.

Conclusion

Aiming for a career in banking can be an exciting and rewarding journey, but the competition is fierce. Joining the bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore can provide you with the structured support, expert guidance, and resources needed to succeed.

Remember to follow the tips outlined above – focus on understanding the exam pattern, managing your time efficiently, practicing consistently, and staying updated with current affairs. By doing so, you'll be well on your way to acing the bank exams and starting your career in the banking sector.

Ready to Start Your Bank Exam Journey?

If you're serious about cracking the bank exams and want to give yourself the best chance of success, consider enrolling in the best bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore today. Take the first step towards securing your future and achieving your career goals in the banking industry.

This blog post provides valuable tips while highlighting the importance of a bank exam coaching center in Coimbatore three times, giving readers insights into what can make their bank exam preparation effective and successful.

[anamca123]

How to Choose the Right Mumbai CA Firm for Your Business Needs

Introduction

Starting and managing a business involves several critical decisions, and choosing the right Chartered Accountant (CA) firm is one of the most important. For business owners in Mumbai, where the economic landscape is both dynamic and competitive, selecting the right CA firm can significantly impact the financial health of their business. Whether you are a startup, an established business, or an expanding enterprise, having the right financial expertise is essential. This blog will guide you through the process of choosing the perfect Mumbai CA firms that aligns with your business needs and objectives.

Why Choosing the Right CA Firm is Critical for Your Business

Before diving into the specifics, it's important to understand why selecting a competent CA firm matters. In Mumbai, where businesses are often subject to evolving tax laws, regulatory requirements, and financial reporting standards, a qualified CA can help ensure compliance, minimize tax liabilities, and offer sound financial advice. An experienced CA firm will offer more than just bookkeeping—they will be your trusted partner in steering your business towards sustainable growth.

Key Factors to Consider When Choosing Mumbai CA Firms

When choosing a Mumbai CA firm, several critical factors come into play. These will not only guide you in picking the right fit for your business but will also help ensure that your financial affairs are in the right hands.

1. Experience and Specialization

One of the first things to look for when selecting a CA firm in Mumbai is the firm’s experience and area of specialization. Every business has unique financial needs, whether it’s related to tax planning, auditing, GST compliance, or financial reporting. Some firms specialize in specific industries or sectors, while others may have broad expertise in various areas.

Industry Experience: A CA firm with experience in your industry is better equipped to understand the nuances of your business and provide tailored advice. For example, if you run an e-commerce business, a firm with experience in digital businesses will know the ins and outs of online tax policies, cross-border transactions, and other industry-specific regulations.

Specialized Services: If you need help with mergers and acquisitions, international taxation, or financial modeling, look for a firm with expertise in those areas. Many Mumbai CA firms have specialized departments that handle different aspects of business finance.

2. Reputation and Reviews

A strong reputation within the local community can provide a solid indicator of a CA firm’s trustworthiness and expertise. You should always check reviews and testimonials from other businesses in your industry to understand how the firm operates and the level of service they offer.

Word of Mouth: Ask other business owners in your circle about their experience with Mumbai CA firms. Recommendations from peers who have similar business needs can be invaluable.

Online Presence: Check the firm’s website and social media profiles. Are they active? Do they have a professional online presence? This reflects their commitment to staying updated with the latest industry trends and regulations.

3. Understanding of Local Regulations and Tax Laws

Mumbai is the financial capital of India, and local regulations and tax laws can change frequently. A good CA firm should have an in-depth understanding of the latest tax laws, GST regulations, and compliance requirements at both the state and national levels.

GST and Direct Tax Knowledge: Taxation laws in Mumbai are complex, and staying compliant is crucial for your business’s success. Your chosen CA firm should have extensive knowledge of GST registration, returns, and tax planning strategies.

Mumbai-Specific Laws: Ensure the firm has experience working with businesses in Mumbai and understands local business laws, including those relevant to your industry.

4. Availability of Technology and Tools

In today’s fast-paced world, technology plays a significant role in streamlining financial processes. A good CA firm will make use of the latest financial tools, accounting software, and data analytics to offer better insights into your business’s performance.

Cloud-Based Solutions: Many modern CA firms offer cloud-based solutions, enabling you to access your financial data at any time and from anywhere. This can help save time and reduce the risk of errors in accounting.

Automation of Tax Filing: With the constant changes in tax laws, firms using automated tools for tax filing and compliance can save you a great deal of effort.

5. Communication and Transparency

Clear communication is crucial when working with a CA firm. The financial language can often be complicated, so it’s important that your chosen firm can explain financial terms and concepts in a way that you can easily understand.

Proactive Communication: A reliable CA firm should keep you updated on the latest tax changes, financial opportunities, and any potential issues with your accounts.

Transparent Billing: Ensure that the firm’s pricing structure is clear and transparent. Hidden charges can quickly lead to unpleasant surprises.

6. Cost and Affordability

While quality service should be your primary consideration, cost is also an important factor. Many small and medium-sized businesses in Mumbai may not have the financial resources to hire the most expensive CA firms, but they still need expert financial advice.

Affordable Options: Some Mumbai CA firms offer tiered pricing based on the complexity of your business needs. If you’re a small business, look for firms that provide affordable packages tailored to startups or smaller enterprises.

Cost Transparency: A good firm will be upfront about their pricing structure and won’t surprise you with hidden fees or unexpected costs.

7. Range of Services Offered

Look for a Mumbai CA firm that provides a wide range of services that match your business needs. In addition to basic bookkeeping and tax preparation, you may require services such as:

Audit and Assurance Services

Business Valuations

Financial Planning and Analysis

Corporate Finance

GST Consultation

Mumbai CA Firms – What Services Do They Provide?

When it comes to choosing the right CA firm, it’s essential to understand the different services that are commonly offered by Mumbai-based CA firms.

Taxation Services

Mumbai CA firms often specialize in tax services, from individual income tax to corporate tax planning. They help businesses comply with tax regulations, minimize tax liabilities, and structure their business finances in the most tax-efficient manner.

Audit and Assurance

Auditing is another crucial service offered by CA firms. It includes the evaluation of financial statements to ensure accuracy and compliance with accounting standards. Mumbai CA firms are highly experienced in auditing both small businesses and large corporations.

Financial Consulting

A well-rounded CA firm can offer consulting on various financial matters, such as business strategy, financial planning, investment management, and corporate restructuring. Financial consulting can play a vital role in expanding your business and ensuring long-term success.

FAQs

Q1: How do I choose the best CA firm in Mumbai?

Choosing the right CA firm depends on several factors, such as specialization, experience, reputation, and the range of services offered. It’s crucial to assess whether the firm understands the local tax laws and business environment in Mumbai.

Q2: What are the main services provided by Mumbai CA firms?

Mumbai CA firms offer services such as tax planning, auditing, business consultancy, financial reporting, and compliance with GST regulations.

Q3: Are Mumbai CA firms affordable for small businesses?

Yes, many Mumbai CA firms provide cost-effective solutions tailored to the needs of small businesses. It’s essential to find a firm that offers transparent pricing and services that suit your business size.

Q4: How do I ensure that the CA firm understands my industry?

Look for a firm that has experience working with businesses in your industry. You can ask for client references or examples of businesses similar to yours that the firm has worked with.

Q5: How can a CA firm help with business expansion?

A CA firm can assist with business expansion by providing advice on tax planning, financial strategies, mergers, acquisitions, and helping you navigate any legal or regulatory challenges.

Q6: What should I do if I am not happy with my CA firm?

If you’re not satisfied with your current CA firm, it’s important to address the issue early. Discuss your concerns with them and see if they can provide a solution. If not, consider finding another firm that better suits your needs.

Q7: What are the common mistakes to avoid when choosing a CA firm?

Common mistakes include not verifying the firm’s credentials, overlooking the firm’s industry experience, and focusing solely on cost instead of the quality of services.

Conclusion

Selecting the right CA firm for your business in Mumbai is a crucial decision that can significantly influence your financial stability and growth. From industry-specific expertise to effective communication, ensure that the firm you choose aligns with your business goals and financial needs. By considering factors such as experience, reputation, services, and technology, you can make an informed decision that will help your business thrive in Mumbai’s competitive environment.

Choosing the right CA firm should not be a rushed decision. Take the time to thoroughly evaluate potential firms to ensure that you find a long-term partner who can provide the financial support and expertise you need to succeed.

[newstodayread]

Fact-Checking Trump’s First Post-Election News Conference

President-elect Donald J. Trump’s first post-election news conference included numerous inaccuracies on topics such as small-business optimism, federal budgeting, autism rates, and pesticide use. Claims made were often exaggerated or misleading, necessitating careful fact-checking to highlight discrepancies between statements and factual data. In his first post-election press conference, President-elect Donald J. Trump presented several claims that were found to be inaccurate, misleading, or exaggerated. Throughout the event, which lasted over an hour, he addressed topics ranging from small-business optimism and federal budgeting to autism rates and pesticide usage. Each assertion made was subject to scrutiny, revealing patterns of misinformation that contradicted established facts or data. The National Federation of Independent Business reported a rise in small-business optimism; however, Mr. Trump’s comment regarding a 41-year record was an exaggeration. The current index, though notably improved, had previously reached higher levels. Furthermore, Mr. Trump asserted plans to save $2 trillion without impacting essential social programs, a claim lacking substantiation as it implied drastic cuts to discretionary spending. In discussing youth voting, Mr. Trump inaccurately claimed he won the demographic by a significant margin. In reality, exit polls indicated that young voters favored Vice President Kamala Harris by a considerable lead. Additionally, he made dubious assertions regarding autism prevalence, suggesting a dramatic rise that was not supported by credible statistics, with research indicating increased awareness and diagnostics rather than a true escalation in incidence. Mr. Trump's remarks on global conflicts were similarly overstated, likening current casualties in Ukraine to catastrophic historical events, despite significant discrepancies in casualty counts compared to other post-war conflicts. Lastly, he inaccurately claimed that Europe does not use pesticides, neglecting to mention that while some pesticides are banned, substantial quantities are still applied in European nations. Overall, Mr. Trump's first post-election press conference showcased his pattern of exaggeration and misinformation on critical issues, highlighting the need for accurate reporting and fact-checking in political discourse. The article addresses the significant inaccuracies presented by President-elect Donald J. Trump during his first press conference following the election. As a prominent political figure, Mr. Trump's statements are subject to extensive scrutiny due to their potential influence on public opinion and policy. The importance of fact-checking these claims is underscored by the broader context of misinformation in political communication, especially pertaining to statistics related to economics, social issues, and environmental practices. Conclusion In conclusion, Mr. Trump’s press conference contained several misleading statements that reflect a broader trend of exaggeration in political rhetoric. The analysis of his claims reveals a disconnect from verified data, emphasizing the imperative for fact-based dialogue in political arenas. As political discourse continues to shape public perception, accountability and accuracy remain crucial. Read the full article

[mariacallous]

In my previous column, I outlined how the government of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador steadily hollowed out U.S.-Mexico security and counternarcotics cooperation despite the vast flows of fentanyl from Mexico to the United States. In this column, I discuss why the insistence of the López Obrador administration that it alone will take care of counternarcotics measures in Mexico is problematic and lacks credibility. Drawing on my recent statement for the record for the U.S. House of Representatives hearing “Follow the Money: The CCP’s Business Model Fueling the Fentanyl Crisis,” I detail U.S. policy options vis-à-vis Mexico to induce better anti-drug and security cooperation.

The evisceration of U.S.-Mexico security cooperation by the López Obrador administration did not come out of the blue. It is part and parcel of the Mexican government’s abdication of security policies and internal responsibilities in Mexico.

At the beginning of his administration, President López Obrador announced a strategy of “hugs, not bullets” toward criminal groups that sought to emphasize socio-economic programs to deal with crime, and address the causes that propel young people to join criminal groups.

But that strategy never articulated any security or law enforcement policy toward criminal groups. Worse, as Mexican criminal groups have resorted to more and more brazen violence and impunity, dramatically expanded the range of legal economies they seek to take over and dominate, and intensified their efforts to influence elections, the López Obrador administration has persisted in its do-little policy.

Essentially, the Mexican president has hoped that if he does not interfere with Mexico’s criminal groups, they will eventually redivide Mexico’s economies and territories among themselves and violence will subside. That policy has been disastrous for many reasons: Most importantly, because it throws the rule of law in Mexico underneath the bus of impunity and subjects Mexican people, institutions, and legal economies to the tyranny of Mexican criminal groups. But also because Mexico’s out-of-control criminal market, plagued by a bipolar and increasingly internationalized war between the Sinaloa Cartel and CJNG, has little chance at such stabilization.

Like other Mexican presidents since the 1980s, López Obrador reshuffled Mexican security institutions. Most significantly, he abolished the Federal Police and created a National Guard staffed mostly by Mexican soldiers and police officers from the former Federal Police.

However, the National Guard is not and could never be an adequate replacement for the Federal Police. President López Obrador dismantled the Federal Police because of its infiltration by Mexican criminal groups, a systematic and pervasive problem for all of Mexico’s law enforcement forces for decades. Since the 1980s, the many iterations of law enforcement reforms have failed to expunge such infiltration and corruption across Mexican agencies.

However, the Federal Police, with all its faults, also had the greatest investigative capacities and mandates. The National Guard has no investigative mandates and very little capacity: It can only act as a deterrent force by patrolling the streets, something that it has not been effective at, or acting against crime in flagrancia. A Mexican lawyer in a conversation with me in 2021 summed it up well: “The National Guard are the most expensive mannequins in Mexico.”

Investigative authorities in Mexico are predominantly the role of the Office of the Attorney General (Fiscalía General de la República, FGR), the Federal Ministerial Police and state prosecutorial offices. But their capacities are limited, all are overwhelmed by the level of crime in Mexico, and all of them have also suffered from criminal infiltration despite decades-long efforts at reform.

Moreover, what remains unanswered and unexamined regarding the law enforcement reforms of the López Obrador administration is the question of what has happened to all of the equipment, technologies, and databases  (such as Plataforma Mexico), and the intelligence that the United States provided the Federal Police with under the $3.5 billion aid package of the Mérida Initiative? Who owns this equipment now: the National Guard? The Mexican military? What accountability has there been for U.S. taxpayers’ money, especially as the López Obrador administration gutted meaningful counternarcotics cooperation even as over one hundred thousand Americans are dying of drug overdose and over thirty thousand Mexicans from homicides?

With the lack of will on the part of the Mexican government and the lack of capacities of Mexican law enforcement institutions to take on the cartels, it is not satisfactory to operate on President López Obrador’s preferred definition of U.S.-Mexico cooperation: the United States countering the flows of weapons and money to Mexico and Mexico doing what it wants, which is very little, in terms of domestic enforcement and with little transparency to boot.

On March 27, news reports began circulating that the United States and Mexico were on the verge of announcing a “new” deal concerning  the fentanyl flows. Subsequent reporting from the end of March the U.S.-Mexico Synthetic Drug Conference in Mexico City rather suggested a hardening of Mexico’s noncooperation crouch.

But whether any eventually-announced renewed U.S.-Mexico cooperation will be more than thin gruel remains to be seen. If such “new” efforts mostly restate López Obrador’s interpretation of the Bicentennial Framework, cooperation will remain inadequate. To be watched is whether Mexico will become more reliable in sharing samples from declared precursor and fentanyl seizures, begins conducting controlled delivery operations, allows agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) at least to observe and ride along on interdiction raids, and starts more systematically acting on U.S. intelligence.

Also yet to be understood is what authorities, if any, the U.S. Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agency has and will have to operate in Mexico. As with the DEA, will HSI be able to ride along on Mexican law enforcement operations or will it be mainly focused on countering weapons and financial flows to Mexico as Mexico prefers?  After the López Obrador administration shackled DEA operations in Mexico (as I detailed in my previous column) the HSI has sometimes been talked about as a replacement for DEA operations. But it is not clear – and unlikely – that HSI can do so.

U.S. counternarcotics and law enforcement bargaining with Mexico is unfortunately constrained by the U.S. reliance on Mexico to stop migrant flows to the United States.  If the United States were able to conduct a comprehensive immigration reform that would provide legal work opportunities to those currently seeking protection and opportunities in the United States through unauthorized migration, it would have far better leverage to induce meaningful and robust counternarcotics and law enforcement cooperation with Mexico. Nonetheless, even absent such reform, the United States can take impactful measures.

Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation to designate Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO). An FTO designation would enable intelligence gathering and strike options of the United States military, such as against some fentanyl labs in Mexico or visible formations of large Mexican cartels – principally CJNG.

However, such unilateral U.S. military actions in Mexico would severely jeopardize relations with our vital trading partner and neighbor whose society is deeply intertwined with ours through familial connections.  Calls for U.S. military strikes against fentanyl-linked targets in Mexico have already been condemned by Mexican government officials, politicians, and commentators.

Meanwhile, the number of available targets in Mexico would be limited. Most Mexican criminal groups do not gather in military-like visible formations. Many fentanyl labs already operate in buildings in populated neighborhoods of towns and cities where strikes would not be possible due to risks to Mexican civilians. Moreover, fentanyl labs would easily be recreated.

Nor would the FTO designation add authorities to the economic sanctions and anti-money laundering and financial intelligence tools that the already-in-place designation of Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) carries. The latter designation also carries extensive prohibitions against material support.

But an FTO designation could significantly limit and outright hamper U.S. foreign policy options and measures. Such prohibitions of material support for designated terrorist organizations have made it difficult for the United States to implement non-military and non-law-enforcement policy measures in a wide range of countries, making it a crime to provide assistance for legal job creation or reintegration support for even populations that had to endure the rule of brutal terrorist groups. To be in compliance with the material support laws, the United States and other entities must guarantee that none of their financial or material assistance is leaking out, including through coerced extortion, to those designated as FTOs.

Yet such controls would be a significant challenge in Mexico where many people and businesses in legal economies, such as agriculture, fisheries, logging, mining, and retail, have to pay extortion fees to Mexican criminal groups. The attempted controls could undermine the ability to trade with Mexico, as many U.S. businesses would not be able to determine whether their Mexican trading or production partner was paying extortion fees to Mexican cartels, and thus guarantee that they were not indirectly in violation of material support clauses.

The FTO designation could hamper the delivery of U.S. training, such as to local police forces or Mexican federal law enforcement agencies, if guarantees could not be established that such counterparts had no infiltration by criminal actors.

Instead, if the López Obrador administration continues to deny meaningful law enforcement cooperation, the United States may have to resort to significantly intensified border inspections, even if they substantially slow down the legal trade and cause substantial damage to Mexican goods, such as agricultural products. Yes, such measures would also cause economic pains in the United States, impacting U.S. trade with Mexico and supply chains. But the U.S. opioid epidemic, fueled by fentanyl, also carries large economic costs, in addition to killing tens of thousands of Americans yearly. In 2020, the latest estimate by the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee put the cost of the opioid epidemic in the United States at nearly US $1.5 trillion, 37 percent higher than a 2017 estimate of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). In contrast, in 2019, U.S. goods and services trade with Mexico totaled an estimated US $677.3 billion , with imports from Mexico $387.8 billion. With higher and growing U.S. yearly deaths since 2020, the cost of the U.S. opioid epidemic is even higher now. Thus, even the economic impact measures clearly imply that major additional efforts to save U.S. lives from lethal overdose and countering fentanyl flows are imperative.

Under optimal circumstances, U.S.-Mexico law enforcement cooperation would be robust enough to make legal border crossings fast and efficient. Joint fentanyl and precursor busts and seizures could take place near production labs and at warehouses. Joint inspections of legal cargo heading to the United States could take place close to production and loading sites in Mexico. Under the Mérida Initiative, the Obama administration, in fact, sought to develop along with Mexico such systems of legal cargo inspection inside Mexico and away from the border.

But if Mexico refuses to act as a reliable law enforcement partner to counter the greatest drug epidemic in North America, which is also decimating lives in Mexico, the United States may have to focus much intensified inspections at the border, despite the economic pains.

Furthermore, the United States can also develop packages of leverage, including indictment portfolios, against Mexican national security and law enforcement officials and politicians who undermine and sabotage rule of law cooperation with the United States. Instead of giving up on the type of arrests like that of former Mexican Secretary of Defense Gen. Salvador Cienfuegos in October 2020, the United States could double up on them.

The structural characteristics of synthetic drugs, such as fentanyl, including the ease of developing similar, but not scheduled, synthetic drugs and their new precursors, pose immense structural obstacles to controlling their supply.

U.S. domestic prevention, treatment, harm reduction, and law enforcement measures are fundamental and indispensable to countering the devastating fentanyl crisis.

However, given the extent and lethality of the synthetic opioid epidemic in North America and its likely eventual spread to other parts of the world, even supply control measures with partial and limited effectiveness can save lives and thus need to be designed as smartly and robustly as possible. They require reliable international cooperation.

The sabotage of that counternarcotics cooperation with the United States by the López Obrador administration should not be acceptable.

[businessviewpointmag]

Differentiated Instruction Techniques: A Holistic Approach to Learning for Indian Classrooms

In today’s dynamic educational landscape, the one-size-fits-all approach to teaching is no longer effective, especially in diverse and inclusive classrooms. Each student has unique needs, abilities, and learning preferences, making it essential for educators to adopt strategies that cater to all learners. One such strategy is differentiated instruction techniques, a teaching approach designed to tailor educational experiences to individual students’ needs. In this article, we will delve into these techniques, exploring how Indian educators can apply them effectively in their classrooms.

What are Differentiated Instruction Techniques?

Differentiated instruction techniques refer to teaching methods that accommodate different learning styles, abilities, and interests within a classroom. Instead of delivering a uniform lesson, teachers adapt the content, process, and learning environment to ensure that each student can grasp concepts in a way that works best for them.

This strategy is particularly important in India, where classrooms often have students from diverse backgrounds, with varying levels of academic performance. The Indian education system is evolving, with a growing emphasis on inclusivity and catering to special needs students. Differentiated instruction aligns with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which promotes personalized learning and inclusivity in education.

The Importance of Differentiated Instruction in Indian Classrooms

Indian classrooms are typically large, with 30-50 students, each having distinct learning needs. Some students excel in visual learning, while others grasp concepts better through auditory or kinesthetic methods. Moreover, the rise of digital learning tools in India has introduced new ways of engaging students.

Incorporating differentiated instruction techniques allows teachers to address these varying needs. For example, a math problem can be explained through a hands-on activity for kinesthetic learners, while visual learners might benefit from diagrams. By using different teaching techniques, educators can engage all students and improve overall learning outcomes.

Key Differentiated Instruction Techniques for Indian Classrooms

Image-by-ferrantraite

1. Content Differentiation

Content differentiation involves modifying the material being taught to match the student’s learning needs. In Indian classrooms, this can mean using varied texts, videos, or digital resources based on a student’s proficiency level.

For example, in an English language class, advanced learners can be given complex literature, while beginners can start with simple stories. Similarly, for subjects like science, teachers can use local languages or simpler terms for students who struggle with English, ensuring comprehension for all.

2. Process Differentiation

This technique involves adjusting how students engage with the content. Teachers can create flexible groupings, allowing students to collaborate and learn from each other. Process differentiation encourages peer learning, which is highly beneficial in Indian classrooms, as students often come from diverse cultural and educational backgrounds.

Group activities, think-pair-share exercises, or interactive sessions where students teach each other are practical examples of process differentiation. Moreover, incorporating digital tools like online quizzes, interactive simulations, or educational apps, which are increasingly popular in Indian schools, can cater to tech-savvy students while keeping the learning environment engaging.

3. Product Differentiation

Product differentiation involves altering how students demonstrate their understanding of a subject. Instead of relying solely on traditional exams, teachers can allow students to showcase their knowledge through projects, presentations, or creative assignments.

In India, where there is often a heavy emphasis on exams, product differentiation offers a refreshing change. Students who may struggle with test anxiety or written exams can demonstrate their knowledge through art, storytelling, or digital presentations. This not only boosts their confidence but also ensures a more comprehensive understanding of the material.

4. Learning Environment Differentiation

The physical setup of a classroom can influence how students learn. A flexible classroom environment can support diverse learners by offering different areas for group work, quiet study, or hands-on activities.

In Indian schools, where space might be limited, teachers can still create designated zones for various activities, such as reading corners, discussion zones, or activity tables. Adjusting the environment according to the student’s needs fosters a more inclusive learning atmosphere.

Practical Application of Differentiated Instruction Techniques in Indian Schools

Image-by-stokpic

Implementing differentiated instruction techniques requires planning and creativity. However, Indian educators can use the following strategies to integrate these techniques effectively:

Flexible Grouping: Teachers can group students based on their learning levels, interests, or skills. For example, during a history lesson, students interested in arts can work on drawing historical figures, while others might engage in role-play activities or writing essays.

Tiered Assignments: Assignments can be designed at different difficulty levels, ensuring that both advanced and struggling learners remain engaged. For instance, in a math class, some students can work on challenging problems while others focus on basic concepts.

Use of Local Contexts: In Indian classrooms, leveraging the local context is vital. Teachers can design lessons that include examples, case studies, or real-life applications relevant to the students’ cultural and social backgrounds. For example, a lesson on environmental science can include local ecosystems or issues like pollution in Indian cities.

Technology Integration: With the rise of digital education in India, teachers can use various online platforms and apps to provide personalized learning experiences. Interactive tools such as Khan Academy or Byju’s can help students at different levels grasp complex concepts at their own pace.

Challenges and Solutions for Implementing Differentiated Instruction Techniques

While differentiated instruction techniques offer numerous benefits, there are challenges, particularly in India’s crowded classrooms. Time management is a major concern, as planning different activities for a large group of students can be overwhelming. Additionally, resource constraints, such as limited access to technology, may hinder implementation.

However, these challenges can be overcome by:

Image-by-VikramRaghuvanshi

Teacher Training: Ongoing professional development for teachers is essential. Workshops and online courses can help educators learn how to implement differentiated instruction effectively.

Collaboration with Parents: Involving parents in the learning process ensures students receive support both at school and at home. Teachers can guide parents on how to assist their children with personalized learning techniques.

Resource Sharing: Schools can create shared resources like lesson plans or activity kits that teachers can use across different subjects and grade levels, reducing the preparation time required for differentiation.

Conclusion

Differentiated instruction techniques are not just a trend but a necessity in modern education, especially in India’s diverse classrooms. By adapting lessons to meet individual student needs, educators can create an inclusive environment that fosters academic growth for all learners. Whether through content, process, product, or environmental differentiation, these techniques ensure that no student is left behind, paving the way for a brighter, more personalized future in Indian education.