#enfp-t

[risathefairyofshampoo]

Requests: Currently Closed

->Blog.Masterlist

->KPOP.Masterlist

->Readings

☀︎︎♉︎ ☾︎♊︎ ☝︎♍︎

I don't chase, I attract

Hey there!

I'm Risa, and I started this blog in 2023. I do tarot readings for the Kpop-industry only. I post when I have time and the energy to do so.

I don't tolerate racism, homophobia or any form of hate. Everyone is treated with respect on this blog. This is a safe space!! - not only for me but also for you. My inbox or dms are always open for you.

[fairyniceyeah]

hey tafeee, what’s your mbti??

Hi anon^^

I have to admit I never took the test until I just saw your ask;)

But apparently I am ENFP-T though I never really expected myself to end up as extroverted but I guess I am very much in the middle XD

I do enjoy my time alone as much as I glow up in lovely company 😇✌🏼

Lots of love

🧚🏻‍♀️

[hart4brainzz]

🩷There was an effort to make ENFP in AI... I think it came out well^^

[prncjmm]

Took the personality test on 16personalities.com and showed that I am a Campaigner/ENFP-T type of person. ENFP-T means that I am extraverted, intuitive, feeling, prospecting and turbulent. Some of the traits that's on the result were new to me, like I didn't thought that I am intuitive rather than observant. This type of tests are helpful to better know ourselves and to be aware of our strength and weaknesses.

[seasoningyeeting]

So this is crazy. I first took this test when I was either 14 or 15 (I’m 21 now,), and got the first result. I remember it so vividly because of the itty bitty RDJ at the end of the page. I took it again in 2022 I believe, (DEFINITELY not “6 months ago” like it recommends you not to take it,) and then today I took it again, and it looks like I got some WILDLY different results. I know these tests don’t reaaaally mean jack, but…still. I don’t know. It’s weird, I agreed with some of the attached articles you get after the test, but some of them I didn’t. I didn’t have my “This is me.” Moment like I did the first two times, but I kind of did??? I don’t know! The only reason I thought to take it again today, is because of all the Hell I’ve been through this year, and it’s only fucking April. Like there has been an exceptional amount of highest highs and lowest lows. I felt like if anything was going to ‘change’ my personality, it’d be the past three months…I just wonder if I’m really right.

[rewrite-canon]

me genuinely trying not to freak out when someone types someone and ends it with “-t” or “-a” like “infp-t” or “estp-a” STOP IT END THIS MADNESS

[dreki-fern]

okay took fukin ages for me to figure it out and I finally did decent cognitive function stuff, and it took a LONG TIME to realize i'm an enfp

[psychologylovingintj]

mbti memes i made because im bored

[berryblu-soda]

anyone else do personality tests for their ocs? im redoing the ones for the favs and getting the exact same answers lmaoo

[sugarlime83]

Okay, fuck you actually.

[the-cosmic-creature]

LETS FUCKING GOOOO

ENFP SUPREMACY 💪‼️🔥

[phlve]

Extraverted Irrational Types

I call the two preceding types irrational for reasons already referred to; namely, because their commissions and omissions are based not upon reasoned judgment but upon the absolute intensity of perception. Their perception is concerned with simple happenings, where no selection has been exercised by the judgment. In this respect both the latter types have a considerable superiority over the two judging types. The objective occurrence is both law-determined and accidental. In so far as it is law-determined, it is accessible to reason; in so far as it is accidental, it is not. One might reverse it and say that we apply the term law-determined to the occurrence appearing so to our reason, and where its regularity escapes us we call it accidental. The postulate of a universal lawfulness remains a postulate of reason only; in no sense is it a postulate of our functions of perception. Since these are in no way grounded upon the principle of reason and its postulates, they are, of their very nature, irrational. Hence my term ‘irrational’ corresponds with the nature of the perception-types. But merely because they subordinate judgment to perception, it would be quite incorrect to regard these types as unreasonable. They are merely in a high degree empirical; they are grounded exclusively upon experience, so exclusively, in fact, that as a rule, their judgment cannot keep pace with their experience. But the functions of judgment are none the less present, although they eke out a largely unconscious existence. But, since the unconscious, in spite of its separation from the conscious subject, is always reappearing on the scene, the actual life of the irrational types exhibits striking judgments and acts of choice, which take the form of apparent sophistries, cold-hearted criticisms, and an apparently purposeful selection of persons and situations. These traits have a rather infantile, or even primitive, stamp; at times they are astonishingly naive, but at times also inconsiderate, crude, or outrageous. To the rationally orientated mind, the real character of such people might well appear rationalistic and purposeful in the bad sense. But this judgment would be valid only for their unconscious, and, therefore, quite incorrect for their conscious psychology, which is entirely orientated by perception, and because of its irrational nature is quite unintelligible to the rational judgment. Finally, it may even appear to a rationally orientated mind that such an assemblage of accidentals, hardly deserves the name ‘psychology.’ The irrational type balances this contemptuous judgment with an equally poor impression of the rational; for he sees him as something only half alive, whose only aim in life consists in fastening the fetters of reason upon everything living, and wringing his own neck with criticisms. Naturally, these are gross extremes; but they occur.

From the standpoint of the rational type, the irrational might easily be represented as a rational of inferior quality; namely, when he is apprehended in the light of what happens to him. For what happens to him is not the accidental—in that he is master—but, in its stead, he is overtaken by rational judgment and rational aims. This fact is hardly comprehensible to the rational mind, but its unthinkableness merely equals the astonishment of the irrational, when he discovers someone who can set the ideas of reason above the living and actual event. Such a thing seems scarcely credible to him. It is, as a rule, quite hopeless to look to him for any recognition of principles in this direction, since a rational understanding is just as unknown and, in fact, tiresome to him as the idea of making a contract, without mutual discussion and obligations, appears unthinkable to the rational type.

This point brings me to the problem of the psychic relation between the representatives of the different types. Following the terminology of the French school of hypnotists, the psychic relation among the more modern psychiatrists is termed I ‘rapport’. Rapport chiefly consists in a feeling of actual accord, in spite of recognised differences. In fact, the recognition of existing differences, in so far as they are common to both, is already a rapport, a feeling of accord. If we make this feeling conscious to a rather high degree in an actual case, we discover that it has not merely the quality of a feeling that cannot be analysed further, but it also has the nature of an insight or cognitional content, representing the point of agreement in a conceptual form. This rational presentation is exclusively valid for the rational types; it by no means applies to the irrational, whose rapport is based not at all upon judgment but upon the parallelism of actual living events. His feeling of accord is the common perception of a sensation or intuition. The rational would say that rapport with the irrational depends purely upon chance. If, by some accident, the objective situations are exactly in tune, something like a human relationship takes place, but nobody can tell what will be either its validity or its duration. To the rational type it is often a very bitter thought that the relationship will last only just so long as external circumstances accidentally produce a mutual interest. This does not occur to him as being especially human, whereas it is precisely in this situation that the irrational sees a humanity of quite singular beauty. Accordingly each regards the other as a man destitute of relationships, upon whom no reliance can be placed, and with whom one can never get on decent terms. Such a result, however, is reached only when one consciously tries to make some estimate of the nature of one’s relationships with one’s fellow-men. Although a psychological conscientiousness of this kind is by no means usual, yet it frequently happens that, notwithstanding an absolute difference of standpoint, a kind of rapport does take place, and in the following way. The one assumes with unspoken projection that the other is, in all essential points, of the same opinion as himself, while the other divines or senses an objective community of interest, of which, however, the former has no conscious inkling and whose existence he would at once dispute, just as it would never occur to the latter that his relationship must rest upon a common point-of-view. A rapport of this kind is by far the most frequent; it rests upon projection, which is the source of many subsequent misunderstandings.

Psychic relationship, in the extraverted attitude, is always regulated by objective factors and outer determinants. What a man is within has never any decisive significance. For our present-day culture the extraverted attitude is the governing principle in the problem of human relationship; naturally, the introverted principle occurs, but it is still the exception, and has to appeal to the tolerance of the age.

Source: Psychological Types

[leefi]

enfp han sooyoung...

[evadingreallife]

Did an mbti type test and om my god where are the hidden cameras

[woonise]

　　　　　　　　　　　n͟e͟w͟j͟e͟a͟n͟s͟ ͟l͟a͟y͟o͟u͟t͟s͟

　　　　　𓄰 ׂ 　𓂃　 jᥙ᥉t f᥆r ᥲ ꧑ιᥒᥙtᥱ　◞　　✻　 　　　　　　dᥲᥒι'᥉ fᥲ᥎　৲⠀enfp　ৎ⠀name　⬪ 　　　　　　　⎺⎻⎼⎽　﹐ 𓎟　lo ve　∯

　　⠀⠀⠀　　　𓍯 𓂃⋰⠀𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗇𝗈𝗐 ≛᜴꤬ ⠀𖡡 ⠀　　　　　　ɞ ˚. 𝗇𝗈𝗐𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀　‿୨♡୧‿　istp 　　　　　　　＞ jeanszine𐦍༘　𝖻𝖺𝖻𝗒 𝗂𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗍 ٫

　　　　　ׂ ׅ﹫minjisluv ₍ ⁾ ₎　𝓒ool 𝓦ith 𝓨ou 　　　　　𓂃　namE! 𝗄𝗂𝗆 ⬫　02 ˖ 　ꕀ　buny 　　　　　　ֹֹ　꒰ ୨୧ ꒱　݁ ۪　𝒪ℳ𝒢　!!

　　　　　feel free to credit / like and reblog if using ♡

[starlightsalvatore]

starlightsalvatore masterlist

about the author: vega - 25 - sagittarius - enfp-t

I write for: all vampires diaries characters

my blog is strictly 18 and up - minors do not interact

please remember that each fic you read represent countless hours the author has spent creating something for you to enjoy. tell them how much you enjoyed reading it. pop into their ask box on anon, write a novel in the reblogs, comment a string of incoherent letters or emojis. I promise it makes our day and is the fuel that keeps us going.

each fic will feature a symbol representing what they will include, or eventually include, but individual parts on this list will not -- you are responsible for your own media consumption so please read the warnings on each post.

key: ✩ author’s favorite ♢ angst ♡ fluff ⚤ m/f smut ⚢ f/f smut

DAMON SALVATORE

✩ hunger (one-shot) ♢ ⚤

your recent transition proves difficult, and damon comes to help with the one thing you desperately need

decisions, decisions ♢ (one-shot)

the two times you discussed your uncertainty regarding immortality, and the one time you didn't have the option

ripper ♢ ♡ (one-shot)

after months of searching for stefan, he returns to mystic falls with one target in mind... you

transition ♢ ♡ (one-shot)

after another day full of fighting supernatural chaos you find yourself unable to push away the one thought that's been plaguing you for months... and you turn to Damon for help

KLAUS MIKAELSON

salvation ♢ (one-shot)

after a deadly encounter in the woods, an old friend comes to your rescue

STEFAN SALVATORE

avalanche ♢ ♡ (one-shot)

your best friend comes to check in on you after your recent transition