#elon musk racist

[sports45]

Elon Musk is an Aspie Supremacist

Elon Musk is an aspie supremacist, in addition to — or, as part of — being a neo-nazi fascist. Aspie supremacy is an “ideology is based upon the belief that people with Asperger’s are superior to other autistics as well as to non-autistics”.

I’ll explain why this is so important and highly relevant — and why the majority of the Autistic community does not identify with Musk’s hateful, bigoted views. Autism is not an excuse for hate or bigotry, and people like Musk give all Autistics a dangerously bad name.

Read more

[charlesoberonn]

Patient: I'm having a heart attack!

Elon: Shouldn't you be concerned about attacks on *all* your organs?

[alwaysbewoke]

[mimi-0007]

THIS!!!

[coochiequeens]

"There were thousands of victims: 1,400 in Rotherham, 1,000 in Telford, more than 300 in Oxford. It was an industry of sexual violence."

By Brendan O’Neill

It’s the scandal that refuses to die. Despite the best efforts of our spineless elites – who’d rather talk about anything on Earth other than grooming gangs – it keeps creeping back. For all the left’s cheap, libellous cries about how racist it is to talk about these gangs, people keep talking about them. In the face of official indifference to the suffering of thousands of poor and working-class girls at the hands of these groomers and abusers, people have demanded a reckoning. There is a public thirst for truth, and no amount of top-down slander and censure can crush it.

Three days into 2025, grooming gangs are back in the news. As British readers will know, ‘grooming gangs’ is the somewhat euphemistic name given to those marauding bands of men from mostly Pakistani backgrounds who subjected girls of the white working class to horrific abuse. In towns across the UK – Rotherham, Rochdale, Huddersfield, Oldham, Telford, Oxford – gangs of men plied girls with drugs, demeaned them, exploited them, raped them. Conservative MP Robert Jenrick has a point when he says the flat phrase ‘grooming gangs’ seems designed to ‘sanitise depraved crimes’. They’re ‘rape gangs’, he says.

They were. The girls who fell victim to these gangs experienced the most hellish degradation. The men ‘deliver[ed] them to hell’, as one prosecutor put it. In Huddersfield, girls were ‘passed around and raped’. In Manchester, a girl was injected with heroin to make her easier to rape. In Rochdale, a girl called Ruby was raped a hundred times from the age of 12. She had an abortion at 13. There were thousands of victims: 1,400 in Rotherham, 1,000 in Telford, more than 300 in Oxford. It was an industry of sexual violence.

What made these horrors even worse – and in some cases what made them possible – was the calculated indifference of officialdom. Across England, local politicians and cops were initially loath to dig into the gangs, lest they stir up ‘sensitive community issues’. They knew very well that gangs of men from Pakistani backgrounds were preying on white girls from the dirt-poor parts of town, but they held back because they didn’t want to be seen as ‘targeting [a] minority group’. In town after town, ‘race relations’ were elevated above the safety and dignity of working-class girls. Protecting the ideology of multiculturalism was seen as more important than protecting girls from rape. The girls were sacrificed to ideology, their humiliation treated as a small price to pay for upholding the edicts of political correctness.

Now, this outrage is making waves again. It follows Home Office minister Jess Phillips’s rejection of Oldham Council’s request for a government-led inquiry into the ‘grooming gangs’ scourge. The fearless reportage of Charlie Peters at GB News has also helped to drag these sick crimes back into the spotlight. Elon Musk is stirring it up too, cack-handedly, using X to slam Keir Starmer’s government and Britain more broadly for our failures over what he calls this ‘rape genocide’. That our media ‘hid’ these atrocities for so long is awful, he says.

There’s historical erasure at play here. Mr Musk, and others, might have first heard about the ‘grooming gangs’ scandal in 2025, but Brits have been aware of it for years. It was the mainstream media that uncovered it. For years The Times was all over this story. Julie Bindel wrote about it as far back as 2007. spiked has covered it in depth for more than a decade. The idea that we need a rich rabble-rouser in America to pry open our eyes to our nation’s legion crimes and failures is ridiculous. Here’s my question for those feverishly tweeting about these ‘grooming gangs’ they’ve just discovered – where have you been?

This horror hasn’t been ‘hidden’. It’s been the subject of much media scrutiny and righteous public fury. But here’s the curious thing, the worrying thing: while there’s been a great deal of reportage on ‘grooming gangs’, there hasn’t been the reckoning we really need. While there have been numerous local inquiries – all cataloguing the gross failures of officials who showed more concern for communal peace than female safety – still the scandal rarely troubles the broader political conscience. Everyone knows about it, but few dwell on it. In polite society it is the great unmentionable, the atrocity that dare not speak its name. You wring your hands over it, and nothing more. You agree it was bad, and you move on.

It’s not hard to see why a culture of cowardice still clings to this scandal more than any other – it’s because the questions it raises about 21st-century Britain are legion, profound and terrifying. Thousands of girls subjected to vile abuse while officialdom, the police, the left and even many feminists looked the other way because they value communal calm more than working-class life and dignity? No wonder they wish this scandal would go away. No wonder they’re content to acknowledge it but never interrogate it. No wonder they’re more comfortable talking about a Tory MP putting his hand on a middle-class journalist’s knee. They simply lack the psychological and moral resources to reflect on what it says about their rule that thousands of poor and working-class girls were raped right under the nose of their bureacracy.

It isn’t because they think the ‘grooming gangs’ scandal is insignificant that they avoid dwelling on it. On the contrary, it is precisely the mammoth nature of the scandal, the vast and swirling questions it raises, that makes them so allergic to grappling with it. This is without question one of the great outrages of the postwar period. It is the moment the state failed, catastrophically, in its most basic duty: to protect its citizens from harm. It’s the scandal that exposes the sinister self-preserving instincts of the bureaucratic elites, who we now know will do anything to protect their ideology and influence, including turning a blind eye to the rape of destitute girls. They shout ‘racist!’ at anyone who talks about ‘grooming gangs’ because they know our pesky questions threaten to unravel their moral pretensions and shatter their political authority. They know what’s at stake.

For nothing exposes the dangerous aloofness of Britain’s new ruling class as much as the ‘grooming’ scandal does. This scandal speaks to their classism, cowardice and deep distrust of us, the public. Every step of the way in this horror, they were guided by their fear of the masses, their dread of the plebs. From their panic about stirring up ‘Islamophobia’ to their fear of fuelling the ‘far right’, they confirmed, again and again, their view of everyday Brits as a mob-in-waiting, as so bigoted and volatile that we cannot be trusted with the truth about these gangs, or anything else. They failed working-class girls and then demeaned the whole public. They treated poor girls as trash and then trashed the right of everyone else to protest against it. This scandal is far from over. It has only just begun.

[weirderscience]

learning that a large portion of ai bros are desperately invested in the idea that "ai" is a rokos basilisk type being that will make everything Great in the future (whatever that means) and the primary way to do it is to make sure everyone imagines a future where that happens and nothing else. its just recycled Manifestation Theory of course theyre going to be threatened by anyone with actual imagination

[kotamagic]

Universe, PLEASE give that orange fuckunt a heart attack. And while you're at it, skin the elongated muskrat as well.

[odinsblog]

Ex-CNN Anchor Presses Billionaire On Claims About Lower Standards For Female And Minority Pilots

Former CNN anchor and now ex-X talk host Don Lemon, released yet another segment of his sit-down interview with X owner Elon Musk today, with the clip showing Lemon pressing Musk about the latter’s claim that the airline industry has lower standards for female and minority pilots than for white male pilots.

Appearing on ABC’s The View today to tout his upcoming, now-YouTube series The Don Lemon Show, Lemon brought along the new interview clip that features a persistent Lemon questioning a seemingly flustered Musk about the pilot issue.

Lemon points out that, after a door-sized panel blew off of an Alaska Airlines/Boeing jet mid-flight, the female pilot landed the plane safely and without further incident.

Musk has repeatedly tweeted and amplified others’ tweets that “DEI” – Diversity, Equity & Inclusion – is being prioritized by the airline industry over safety.

In the clip of the show, set to debut Monday on YouTube and other platforms, Lemon asks Musk, “Do you believe that women and minority pilots are inherently less intelligent and less skilled than white male pilots?”

“No,” Musk replies, “I’m just saying we should not lower standards for them.”

“But,” says Lemon, “there’s no evidence that the standards are being lowered when it comes to the airlines…”

“Ok, you’ve repeatedly said that there’s no evidence that the standards are being lowered,” replies Musk. “Then watch the replies showing all evidence that it is.”

“Replies on social media and twitter are not necessarily fact and evidence,” Lemon says.

(continue reading) related ↵

[angelfacemjj]

The Brazilian government is not wrong for banning twitter. And that action is not censorship by any means.

Let's start w the fact that, ever since melon bought twitter, racists and nazis were able to run around freely throughout the site and organize themselves without any consequences. I seen a screenshot of white supremacist propaganda there, made with ai!

Y'all know what we got the most in this country? Black people, Indigenous people, pardos (race mixed & racially ambiguous people), quilombolas, romani people, we have every fucking kind of non-white flavour in these fucking lands, these niggas fucking hate us! White supremacists fucking hate this country, our government has every reason to look at this and say: “hey, that bad, we gotta get rid of this shit before our population get in serious danger”, and that ain't no censorship! That is regulation!

Regulation prevents nazis from organising themselves.

Regulation stops white supremacists from spreading their sick propaganda.

Regulation blocks csam and csem before it spreads and put children and teenagers in danger.

Regulation is not censorship.

And not to mention how historically significant is this situation, considering how many times the United States and United Stadians unsolicitedly intervened in our laws. Usamericans chronically think they are the owners of américa latina and that they are above our laws. They ain't and y'all have to understand that.

Opera summary, Brazil banning twitter is amazing and anyone who thinks banning nazi material and egocentric billionaires is censorship they should be beaten with a dead cat until it meows. Kisses.

[thashining]

Contradictions huh?

[alwaysbewoke]

and this is why don lost his show on x. he embarrassed elon with a real interview. not some ass kissing, softball questions with no follow up. an actual strong, fact based, confident interview by a real journalist. i've always said that elon could never hold up to a real interview. this was light work to be honest. you think elon would survive an interview by michael harriot, jemele hill, or mehdi hasan? he would melt like a snowball in hell under that kind of pressure and questioning lmsoo

[codenamestasis]

Did he just... yes he did...

I think.. i dunno if i'm imagining it. but i think i remember when Americans didn't... cheer for or defend... nazis.........

to those of you who are defending this scum.. STOP. It wasn't a fucking mistake, it wasn't "awkward".. he's a fucking nazi. And if you stand by him, YOU ARE ALSO A NAZI.

[captainpirateface]

BUDDIES!

And NEW FRIENDS!!!

And I say to these fuckers...

[azrael-5]

Black people are going to die, not just in Ohio, but all over the US, because of the conspiracies being spread about Haitian migrants eating people's pets.

[shadowedinalixir]

If Elon Musk doing the Nazi salute twice doesn’t radicalise you into taking action… I hate to break to you, you’re the very reason the Nazis were able to do in Germany what they did.

[odinsblog]

Bootlicker 🥾👅