#crimes violate the rights of another human being
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Carita inocente = violación sistemática de los derechos humanos, incumplimiento de lo pactado en el convenio de Ginebra y crímenes de guerra uwu
Eng: Innocent lil’ face = systematic violation of human rights, non-compliance with the agreement of the Geneva Convention and war crimes uwu
#inazuma eleven#gouenji shuuya#ishido shuuji#inazuma eleven memes#ina11 go#I had to do this and i don’t regret it xD#boi be like: you can’t violate human rights if you never accepted them#and at the same time he breaks when he hurts someone xD#deserved a little karma for his crimes in a way or another; or just a resolution arc around the stuff he did being honest
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
Reading Tumblr today I get the feeling that a lot of these people praising Hamas' horrific attack on Israeli civilians aren't really pro-Palestine so much as they're just looking for another reason to justify their hatred of Jews. You can believe that the Israeli government has committed unforgivable atrocities against innocent Palestinians without wishing rape and murder on innocent Israeli civilians in turn.
Also, speaking as a white American? We have absolutely ZERO room to talk when it comes to corrupt governments, genocide, ethnic cleansings, land theft, war crimes and basically every other kind of human rights violation there is. If you're a white American who thinks Israeli civilians deserve to die for the actions of their government, then you should have no objection to being murdered for the sins of your own government.
#you can be pro-palestine without hating jews#and nothing justifies rape or murder#to everyone on jumblr i'm so sorry for the abuse you're getting hurled at you right now#it's sick and cruel and you don't deserve it
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
During her arrest, Ayesh was subjected to assault, threats, and insults by Israeli soldiers, according to the Addameer human rights organisation. She was transferred to Israel’s Hasharon Prison before being later taken to Damon Prison, where she is now being held.
Ayesh’s work as a human rights defender rose to the fore during her time at the Ramallah-based Lawyers for Justice, representing Palestinian political detainees in PA prisons. In July, she attended a session on behalf of the group at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland.
Tala Nasser, from the Addameer prisoners’ rights group, explained that Ayesh’s arrest comes amid a “violent mass arrest campaign” carried out by Israel since October 7.
The fact that the vast majority of the more than 6,900 Palestinians arrested in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem since October 7 have been transferred to administrative detention highlights the arbitrariness of Israel’s arrests, she said.
“This campaign includes activists, human rights defenders and political leaders,” Nassar told Al Jazeera, noting that it is “an attempt to silence them and prevent the exposure of the occupation’s crimes across the whole country”.
In December, Israeli forces also arrested political and civil society leader Khalida Jarrar, who was similarly transferred to administrative detention.
Despite releasing all but three Palestinian female detainees during the latest prisoner exchange with Hamas at the end of 2023, the Israeli army rearrested dozens. Some 80 female prisoners are being held today, all of whom are in the Damon Prison.
Among the 80 are dozens of women from the besieged Gaza Strip, but lawyers are forbidden from visiting them or knowing anything about them.
Several reports have emerged of female detainees from Gaza being physically beaten and abused, including an unknown number of them being held at Israeli military bases and not in prison.
Lawyers say conditions for all Palestinian detainees, including women, are unprecedentedly difficult. Eight Palestinian male prisoners have also died or were killed in Israeli custody since October 7, most of them in the days and weeks after their arrest.
Over the past few months, many videos have emerged of Israeli soldiers stripping, torturing and abusing male prisoners from both the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
“It is important to note that every female that is arrested is violated in one way or another,” said Nasser. “They are all facing threats, intensive strip searches, verbal assault and physical violence.”
(continue reading)
#politics#palestine#gaza#diala ayesh#israel#political prisoners#israeli hostages#human rights abuses#administrative detainees
656 notes
·
View notes
Note
Have you seen the recent comment made by Jelly Fish Field on your itch page for Project Hadea. I just read it, and found their view really interesting and extremely important criticism on how you've decided to write certain reactions. I love your writing a lot, so it was extremely eye opening what they wrote. What i'm getting at is, I would just like to hear your feedback on that specific comment! all love, and I do hope this won't be taken the wrong way!
I've seen it, yeah. and... okay, I've discussed my reasons for not using rape as a content warning before, and I stand by them; I'm not revisiting any discussion on what does and does not constitute rape. the content is warned for, by specifics of what occurs in the text, to give people the chance to make the most informed decision they can about whether to play. that's it.
as for the rest of it... there's things in there that I understand. I get being frustrated that you can't fully explore the extent of the operative's trauma, yet; I get feeling like the rest of the crew don't trust you, or like rohan is a bitch. they don't, and xe is.
the thing that I find disagreeable about a lot of these criticisms (and similar ones) is that I think they betray a fundamental misreading of the text: the operative is a war criminal. they are heavily armed, unstable, and trapped on a ship with civilians. they kill multiple civilians in chapter one; they might well attempt to kill rohan in front of everyone, and later succeed in doing so. they are a confirmed murderer, who by and large refuses to tell the civilians why they are so angry with rohan. this is by design.the focus of this story is very much about coming to terms with your trauma - from long before you meet rohan! you've been medically experimented on, had your personhood denied for a long time, and had any kind of human empathy stamped out of you. part of the point of the game is for me to explore how trauma can be expressed in ways that are deeply unpalatable - the operative is not a "perfect victim" (a phrase I loathe) and their trauma impacts the way they move through the world, drawing out reactions that aren't wholly sympathetic or empathetic, because their actions are often unjustified and cause real harm, or seem that way to those who don't have full context.
this is why joia is important, this is why your relationships with the crew are important. the crew aren't intended to be author voices, they're not the moral compass here or audience stand-ins: they aren't supposed to represent the "correct" approach to dealing with other people's trauma. no character in this situation is intended to be seen as perfect, but as a way to shine light on different facets of the story.
the operative is built a very specific way, for very specific reasons: this is intentional. they are a person who has been deliberately dehumanised, used as a weapon, who volunteered and fought for the right to be a scientific guinea pig for the war crimes company, in order to be of greater use to said company. they have had their bodily autonomy violated so habitually, for their whole career - they have been coercively used as a test subject by their employer - that they can't see it as an abnormal violation. this isn't to say it is justified, or to diminish the traumatic impact rohan has, but... it's not the operative's first rodeo here, even if it's the player's.
they're bad at processing their emotions. the operative Does Not Cry: this is a character choice I have made. this is because they have had that emotional response beaten out of them. the operative isn't capable of taking their own trauma seriously, because they're not equipped to deal with it. they can't look at it head-on.
likewise, nash isn't capable of being a gentle, reassuring, sympathetic person, much as they might want to; a big part of that relationship is the idea that the pair of you have to relearn to how to relate to one another in your new contexts, and that isn't a smooth process. nash also has reasons to be reticent with you that are yet to be explored - this relationship is undergoing development, with both of you as violent people who commit violent acts, and who relate through violence. your relationship is built on your capacity to commit violence together. they are not equipped to deal with violence affecting you in the way it might someone else, because you've both spent the last ten years being conditioned and trained to assault other people. part of the theme of this game is to explore the way these people might experience a uniquely traumatic violent event, and the effect this might have on their own capacity to endure and process violence again themself.
I understand that it might not be the way people want to play their characters, but it's the way the character is written, and I am doing that on purpose. all I'm asking is that you trust me when I say that this is not going to be swept under the rug, even in the least volatile relationship you can have with rohan. if that's not possible for you - if you can't trust me to do this - then you're welcome to stop playing.
#honestly i think a lot of the criticisms in that post come from wanting to play a different game.#if you don't like joia: this game is not for you#if you dislike all the characters: this game is not for you#if you believe wholeheartedly that sex under false pretences is always rape. then it is in fact warned for#i always appreciate feedback but this was so comprehensively complaining about every aspect of the game that i have to assume#that they just didn't like it#which is fine! but i'm not going to change everything about it; especially the things that are very intentional and thematic#anon#long post#sorry. got away from me
135 notes
·
View notes
Text
I think what’s driving me genuinely a little insane as the committed Zionists around me continue being committed Zionists is that it’s like - such an explicitly protectivist, nihilistic, “might makes right” political ideology even if you pretend that the land they wanted to colonize was actually uninhabited.
Like The Jewish State kicks off with
Like I understand that the misery could be an activating force, but that’s a far cry from basing your political ideology on the idea that your people have always been miserable, will always be miserable, and can only be marginally more safe by creating a bunker nation on colonized land and enforcing an demographic majority with walls and an army.
The people who buy into this are the same people who tell me that genocide is inevitable; that “never again” means never again for specifically the Jews, that “sometimes ethnic cleansing is the only option” because “the Jews can never be an ethnic minority in their own land again”, that any crime is worth achieving that outcome because it is the only possible bulwark against another Holocaust
And it’s like do you not see that this is how fascism happened! This kind of ethnic in-group protectionism and Nihilism about the ability of humans to ever achieve long-term cooperation and the beliefs about fundamental human inequality and the assertion that nothing but maintaining a majority which can forcefully suppress any minorities is the only way to stay safe as a nation is - just nuke them already, if that’s what you think. just get humanity over with, because if youre right we're all fucked. there is nothing down that road but endless cycles of ethnic cleansing and revenge.
Like we could have gone down a road where international bodies had more power, where people had more ability to reign in nations committing civil rights violations, where human rights are not subject to national sovereignty. We could have lived in a world where Jews used their unique position as a people to act as advocates for all minorities everywhere, to establish political bodies which actually had some means of intervening if a state began to violate the human rights of its ethnic minorities.
Like fundamentally I don’t understand how you come out of WW2 and say “you know what the solution to this is? more nationalism”
102 notes
·
View notes
Text
To piggyback off of @shunnedmorlock's post here about the relative justification for both the black and green causes, and how the show presents Rhaenyra's cause as sympathetic.
The in-world choice of who to support in an internecine conflict is, for a lot of lords, ultimately going to be based in self-interest rather than legal, ideological or moral justifications. This fandom fixates a lot on who is in the "right," but the houses that throw their support behind Rhaenyra or Aegon mainly do it for self interest or self preservation. Every lord is going to have multiple literal dragons breathing down their necks, many lords are going to be offered enticements from one side or the other, and some will be considering their own personal circumstances and the precedent their choice sets. A great number of the houses seem pretty determined to stay out of the conflict altogether, even several of the houses that pledge their support in theory, wait until the risk of being caught up in a dragon battle has passed to take any action.
For viewers, our reasons for supporting one side or another are different. Strictly speaking, looking at things from a modern framework, no one has a "right" to the throne. Usurpation is not a human rights violation or even a crime by our standards. Imagine fixating on women being unable to own slaves and thinking that a woman fighting for her right to do so is an expression of feminism. Ridiculous! Certainly it is bullshit within an already bullshit system that a woman comes after her brothers in a hereditary monarchy, but in a just system this conflict wouldn't exist in the first place, not because Rhaenyra would automatically be queen, but because Westeros wouldn't have a king or a queen at all. Liberation doesn't start at the top and trickle down, but rather the opposite.
That said, to modern viewers, Rhaenyra's cause is sympathetic because it feels like an injustice. Most of us don't live within a feudal system and do not have the framework to understand why it's not a form of oppression to be denied the throne. We see it more like a presidential race, in which Rhaenyra is the Hillary Clinton who might have defeated Trump in 2016 if not for misogyny, in which even if we didn't particularly like her, we were disgusted by the fact that that man beat a woman who was at worst no different from many of the men who had occupied the seat before her. To the average vaguely liberal American watching the show, it's insane for fans to support Aegon and the greens and clearly you'd only do it for horny or antifeminist reasons. And you see that a bit in even the showrunners' comments on Alicent being a "woman for Trump," how both they and much of the audience fail to fully understand the historical framework, but in a way that's kind of understandable, because while what happens to Rhaenyra might not be injustice, it is unfair.
If you're looking at things from a historical in-world framework, this is a world in which stability takes a higher priority than equality. Inequality is everywhere, completely baked into the system. If you want to bring about gender equality in a feudal monarchy with a large agrarian population, you have to have first the stability necessary for the rise of an urban middle class which allows for more women to move into the trades, you need the printing press for widespread literacy, which means that more women are getting educated, you need movements such as the reformation to challenge the divine right of kings, and you need to reform the political structure so that leadership is not based on birthright in the first place, because that concept inherently reinforces patriarchal norms even in modern countries that allow women to become queens regnant. So making one woman queen is not going to make things better for women across Westeros, but that woman going to war to reclaim her "stolen" birthright could make things a whole lot worse for a pretty much everyone. This is why you see a lot of history nerds on this site going well, yes but Rhaenyra does have the weaker claim because common law was a big deal in the medieval world and her becoming queen is going to lead to long term succession crises due to the circumstances of her children's birth, so the thing to do would be to take the peace deal. Because while on an emotional level you can understand why she doesn't, it's not the choice that prioritizes the good of the realm.
I think on some level Condal understands (and I think GRRM probably hammered this point home) that you can't really grant anyone the moral high ground in a war of succession if you want to approach the issue with any level of nuance; Rhaenys' speech in the previews for S2 seems to indicate as much. The problem with HotD is that it wants to have its cake and eat it too. It wants to say war for the throne bad, but HBO also wants to make up for the way GoT fumbled the ball with Dany and give the people their likeable dragonriding princess triumphant.
Except Rhaenyra isn't triumphant, she is felled by her own Targaryen hubris and belief that nothing could possibly overcome the might of dragons. It's not Aegon that defeats her, truly, it's the people emboldened in various ways to act against Targaryen interests. It's the dragonseeds she hands dragons to who wonder why they have to take orders from a queen or king when they have control of the kingmaking weapons of mass destruction, it's the smallfolk who face down dragons with pitchforks because they've had enough. They've backed themselves into a bit of a corner with what @shunnedmorlock called the "engoodening" of the black faction, but they can turn it around by showing that it's not enough to be nice to your family, you have to actually care about the people and at the very least (the bar is on the floor, it's fuedalism!) not throw them into chaos, famine, and war for no reason. Give us payoff for Rhaenys' dragonpit scene, have Mysaria and Alys Rivers play a role in their sides' downfalls, show how resentment on Dragonstone allows Aegon to infiltrate. And yes, show Rhaenyra losing herself and becoming a worse person, but in ways that the audience can't excuse as justified. This is how you sow the seeds for that actual progressive change that people seem so desperate to find in the dragonshow, you show how the Dance emboldens the regular people who for the first time realize they can slay dragons, dovetailing into the new show, which stars Dunk, a commonborn man from Fleabottom, and Aegon V, the only Targaryen who ever cared about the smallfolk.
Can HBO pull it off? Ehh. But I remain eternally hopeful, against my better judgement.
107 notes
·
View notes
Text
The exquisite choreography of hosting a war criminal at the White House
The grisly farce that is the Biden administration’s support for Israeli war crimes became even more grotesque this week.
Netanyahu is coming to Washington in a few days. Democrats believe overwhelmingly that Netanyahu is carrying out a genocide– nearly 39,000 Palestinians deaths with thousands more under the rubble. So some Dems will boycott Netanyahu’s speech to the Congress, but the Democratic Party leadership is rolling out the welcome mat.
Netanyahu is to meet at the White House with the president who has provided Israel with endless munitions to carry out the war. And though many expect Biden to drop out of the presidential race,the New York Times says Biden won’t do so before he meets with Netanyahu, because Biden does not want to give the far-right-wing prime minister who has repeatedly bossed Democratic presidents the “satisfaction” of seeing Biden when he’s a lame duck.
Though if you think Kamala Harris will stand up for human rights and U.S. interests if she becomes president—think again, she is going to meet Netanyahu too, the White House assured the press.
Why meet with this war criminal at all? To answer that, consider who are the most important voters in the Biden debate right now: the donors who are the last shoe to drop on Biden’s reelection hopes, pulling their money to pressure the president to get out of the race.
Many of these donors now in rebellion are big Israel supporters. Michael Moritz the latest billionaire to put it to Biden has been in solidarity with Israel. Reid Hoffman who organized a concerned donors call with Kamala Harris calls Israeli forces a model.
While another group of 75 donors almost all of whom want Biden out is reported by CNBC to include as leaders Ari Emanuel and his brother Zeke. Ari Emanuel said that Israel’s war is “justified” in May 2024, and has said that he loves the country. Of course, there are Dem donors who don’t care about Israel. But the power map is clear.
It’s not like Trump is any different. The top Republican donor is thought to be Miriam Adelson, the Israeli doctor, and she is reportedly spending millions to stake Trump to a promise to allow Israeli annexation of the West Bank.
Just as Adelson’s late husband Sheldon, once the biggest Republican donor, asked Trump to move the embassy to Jerusalem and trash the Iran deal, and Trump followed through, in utter contempt for the Palestinian people and world leaders.
So our Middle East policy is up for bid by billionaire zealots. This is what a liberal democracy looks like.
In any just order, the U.S. would have nothing to do with Israel. The country is committing flagrant war crimes in Gaza, killing journalists and athletes and other civilians with complete impunity.
And the International Court of Justice last week issued (yet another) ruling saying that the settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank are violations of international law.
Back in December 2016 the Obama administration after 8 years of being walked over by Netanyahu allowed the U.N. Security Council to issue the same determination, in a resolution on which Obama abstained, that condemned the occupation. President-elect Trump called the Russians to try and stop the resolution but it went through. And of course nothing came of it. The Biden administration has never followed through on the landgrab, and the ethnic cleansing.
Al Jazeera graphic showing Israeli land seizures at a 25 year high in West Bank.
The Knesset passed a resolution this week saying there must never be a Palestinian state; that would be an “existential threat” to Israel.
Netanyahu repeated the claim of Jewish supremacy in his response to the International Court of Justice.
The Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land, including in our eternal capital Jerusalem nor in Judea and Samaria, our historical homeland. No absurd opinion in the Hague can deny this historical truth or the legal right of Israelis to live in their own communities in our ancestoral home.
The Biden administration is incapable of condemning these racists. “It’s like pulling teeth to get you to say something on this,” a reporter complained in the State Department this week after the Knesset’s attack on a Palestinian state.
Antony Blinken was unable to say a critical word about Netanyahu during a fawning interview in Aspen (by NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly) in which he used a football metaphor to claim the U.S. was doing something to stop the genocide. “I believe we’re inside the 10-yard line and driving toward the goal line in getting an agreement that would produce a ceasefire, get the hostages home, and put us on a better track to trying to build lasting peace and stability.”
And keep the bombs flowing, as Israel bombs hospitals and refugee camps…
Netanyahu should be persona non grata in Washington. But he will be welcomed with open arms.
As a former Biden official Tariq Habash said on a webinar this week, our policy is “rooted in anti-Palestinian racism”– in the dehumanization and erasure of Palestinians.
Habash quit the Biden administration in January. Let’s hope that his courage and honesty are infectious.
#israel#gaza strip#gazaunderattack#free gaza#genocide#israel is a terrorist state#gaza#free palestine#palestine#jerusalem#death to netanyahu#benjamin netanyahu#fuck netanyahu#arrest netanyahu#bibi netanyahu#netanyahu a criminal of war
68 notes
·
View notes
Text
People of conscience around the world are rightfully shattered, enraged, and sometimes feeling powerless. Many feel compelled to boycott any and all products and services of companies tied in any way to Israel. The proliferation of extensive “boycott lists” on social media is an example of this. The question is how to make boycotts effective and actually have an impact in holding corporations accountable for their complicity in the suffering of Palestinians? The BDS movement uses the historically successful method of targeted boycotts inspired by the South African anti-apartheid movement, the US Civil Rights movement, the Indian anti-colonial struggle, among others worldwide. We must strategically focus on a relatively smaller number of carefully selected companies and products for maximum impact. Companies that play a clear and direct role in Israel’s crimes and where there is real potential for winning, as was the case with, among others, G4S, Veolia, Orange, Ben & Jerry’s and Pillsbury. Compelling such huge, complicit companies, through strategic and context-sensitive boycott and divestment campaigns, to end their complicity in Israeli apartheid and war crimes against Palestinians sends a very powerful message to hundreds of other complicit companies that “your time will come, so get out before it’s too late!” Many of the prohibitively long lists going viral on social media do the exact opposite of this strategic and impactful approach. They include hundreds of companies, many without credible evidence of their connection to Israel’s regime of oppression against Palestinians, making them ineffective. That being said, all peaceful popular efforts, including boycott and divestment, to hold all genuinely complicit corporations (and institutions) accountable for supporting Israel’s grave violations of Palestinian rights are justified and called for. It is perfectly legitimate, for instance, to boycott companies whose Israeli branch or franchise has supported Israel’s unfolding genocide in Gaza, some of which we mention below in the grassroots organic boycott targets section. Also, a company or product may make perfect sense as a boycott target in one context or city but not another. This context-sensitivity is a key principle of our movement. Regardless, we all have limited human capacity, so we’d better use it in the most effective way to achieve meaningful, sustainable results that can truly contribute to Palestinian liberation. We therefore call on our supporters to strengthen our targeted campaigns and boycott the complicit companies named on our website to maximize our collective impact. The following are the current top priority boycott targets of the global BDS movement.
203 notes
·
View notes
Text
title: do not fall apart before they do. tiktok originally made by umnia_ video transcript below the cut
[ID: With the magnitude of what has been happening in Gaza in the last 8-9 months, I really hope you guys deeped it when people of color were trying to tell you to pace yourselves- because now is around the time a lot of you are going to start *clicks tongue, slashes hand over forehead* Like, there's going to be yet another tragic massacre right in front of you on your screen- and you're just not gonna react because you're burnt out. and that's when they get you. This is- this is an endurance test.
Colonialism *laughs* and- and death and destruction. Necropolitics is an endurance test. How many people can we kill before you tap out on even seeing them as people? Until you- until you don't get it. Until you just- it no longer registers. How many people does it need to be? 300,000? 400? It- they will just keep going.
They don't see them as people. So what- what avenue do they have to stop? What avenue do they have to go, "oh, my god!" Like- they don't have one. They don't see these- they see them as- they don't even see them as numbers on a sheet. They don't think of these massacres by the numbers. Everyone else has to do the numbers. They don't even see the numbers. They're thinking in terms of the spreadsheet that has the bombs and the money on it. They're not thinking about the people, ever.
200 people? Okay *muttered speech* They have this double tap thing (which is a violation). It's a war crime where they go, "We'll do a little small explosion here. Everyone will run to try and try to save everybody- and we'll do another one." That would've horrified you in October, and now you're just like, "Yeah, cause it's Israel." That's how they get you. That's how they get you! That's how they get you.
(speaker mimicking others' most common comments) Well, what are we supposed to do? They say it's a civil war in Sudan. Wha- how am I meant to boycott gold like that? How does that even work? Like- I'm being asked to boycott so many things.
This- this is- this is when people of color have told you all of the different pitfalls. It was for the moment here- this moment- where Meta keeps switching off the political content even when you switch it back on again. It's for the "I haven't seen anything about Palestine in like, four days." It's for the "they- they bombed the school and they burned all the kids inside- all the kids." And you go, "Yeah- I mean, god, Israel- just- is there no low they won't stoop to?" It's for that moment. It's for that moment. That's when they get you. That is when they get you. That is when they get you.
And it's now no time for half measures. You've gotta be "October heated" about every single moment. And some of that means that you don't tap in until like 2 PM each day. Or you have- you cannot be guilty about the one or two things you do a day that are for you. You don't have to feel guilty about the week where you are just silent reposting and getting your mental back because at least you're doing something.
Like- that is how you maintain your humanity as they keep going. Because they can't- they don't- they won't stop. And if you can keep up with them, they run out of money, and that's when you can get them. And there's no recourse for them anymore. They need someone at every single speech going, "You're funding a genocide." They need everyone turning up to vote against them.
They- there's so many different avenues that mean you don't have to sacrifice your daily coffee and your nice little bubble bath to ruin their lives when they do this- when they kill this amount of people. You can really disrupt stuff. Even if it just means that your one action for the whole week is explaining to all your co-workers why that person who shouted at Jimmy Kimmel is an icon. That's the- that's the one.
Because finally- one day they run out of money- they run out of goodwill. They are worn down by the fact that you won't let this go, and they stop. You've disrupted their balls- you've disrupted their interviews- you've disrupted their money. Boycott, boycott, boycott. And eventually *speaker makes explosion sound* it all shuts down.
We're watching it shut down right now. That's why they're getting vicious. One might argue this entire assault is the final flamethrow of a dying empire. Do not let them guilt you into using everything you have in your power to maintain your humanity and stay in the fight. And that does not mean you have to be burning yourself out every day. It means sometimes that your only daily action is those instagram posts- those instagram stories. But you're still not stopping. No one's gonna shut you up.
Go as slow as you need to as long as you want. Do not stop. Because this is the moment. This is the moment that they're waiting for you to cave. They're waiting for you to burn out and to not- and to not see those kids as kids-- and to not see that granddad-- and to go, "What?! Another atrocity? What- another thing they're doing in the prison? What? Another thing? Ah, look at the dog! The dog they sent on the poor grandma."
You can't just be like *clicks tongue, slashes hand over forehead* and you can't just go like, "Why does no one care?!" You just have to beat them at the endurance test.
The- if you ever- if you ever-- I mean all people of color can do this for you, but if you ever need an example of an endurance test, pay attention to Palestinians. Follow Palestinians. They have been in this for a time- a length of time you cannot fathom. There are people who have been born into this who were born of people who were born into this, okay? They know endurance. Follow their lead. They're still graduating. They're still having their coffees. They're still doing their makeup, and--
And you just keep going. Just keep going. Just keep going. Just keep going. Because the thing is, you can- you can maintain your sanity. They cannot maintain this. This cannot go on forever. This will end up falling apart, but only if you don't fall apart first. END ID]
#umnia_#tiktok#not choices#🍉#🇸🇩#🇭🇹#🇨🇩#video time: 6ish min#strongly recommend yall give it a watch esp if you are starting to feel weary#v important reminder
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
Yeah, the desire to fit Hank and Connor into romantic or familial roles, regardless of which ones those are, often results in erasing canon traits of both of them being snarky cynical assholes with no actual authority over one-another. Hank is not an “adult” of the two, he doesn’t even have his own shit together to teach someone else how to, and Connor doesn’t exactly respect Hank as an authority, never did, but he does however put his customer service smile for pretence of being just another polite service android (totally without the capability of breaking a law or hurting a human), but even this is optional as he can be mean right from the beginning. He will make sure to find what you care about not only in order to make you like him, but also to ensure to find the exact words that will get to you in order to hurt if he finds that to be more efficient. He’ll make his insults as personal as he makes his compliments (which are, let’s be honest, mostly quite shallow in both cases), but for some reason this fandom takes first ones as genuine (even when they’re extremely obviously fake and only there as a manipulation) and the existence of others prefers to just ignore completely. Even though they are as genuine (as in potentially not at all) if not more.
Connor didn’t start liking Hank right away, frankly his honest description of him was “an unpleasant and dysfunctional” BUT also “intriguing”. He developed a sentimental attachment for Hank over time, but in no way he began to respect Hank on a level of authority, not more than Hank himself started to respect Connor, which in both cases is “as a person”.
Hank himself is highly opinionated cop who sees nothing wrong with taking some bribes here and there. In no way he’s holy. I doubt he craves power as much as he craves reinforcing his own definition of moral justice, which, in no way means that he’s always right and isn’t one of many corrupted cops in a corrupted system, it just means that he doesn’t have respect towards the law and rules he “should” follow and instead has his own (Do you think he’s always “fair” and never cuts some slack to those who don’t deserve it (*cough* a place with a history of food safety violations *cough*) or instead harshly punish those whose biggest crime was just being annoying and pissing him off when he’s not in the mood? We know the man is fucking reactive and real quick to throw hands. We often point out that Gavin suggested to “roughen up a little” but I don’t see no one talking about how unnecessary harsh Hank handles Rupert in case he and Connor happen to catch up with him. Do you think Rupert is the first one or Hank is only acting this way because Rupert is an android? I doubt it.)
71 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Western hypocrisy over Armenia makes me so angry. Nagorno-Karabakh is going to get ethnically cleansed by Azerbaijan, and the west will do nothing. Like the Russian invasion of Ukraine is a crime, but you can't be against buying oil and gas from Russia and be okay with buying it from Azerbaijan without being a massive hypocrite. The Western world is only against human rights violations when it serves their interests. Russia is opposed to those interests, so its evil, but Turkey and Azerbaijan are allies of the west, so they are good, despite doing everything bad that Russia also does. A plague on both their houses.
And don't go "Armenia is allied with Russia, so they deserve being genocided" as I've seen Turkey/Azerbaijan apologists say. Armenia like every small nation are dependent on larger nations, and they due to their geographic position the choice has been between Russia and Turkey. And Russia has always been the lesser evil. The Sovietization of Armenia was bad, but compared to Turkey's genocide it followed, it was practically humanitarian. But the west has consistently been on the Turkish side.
In the post-soviet era, there was zero chance of Armenia joining NATO and the western side, hell will freeze over before Turkey allow Armenia in NATO, everyone knows that. Legit I think a small part of Turkey's opposition to Sweden in Nato is that our parliament once voted to recognize the Armenia genocide (the other larger part is that we accepted kurdish refugess from Turkey's attempt to genocide the kurds, but that's another story).
Consequently Armenia naturally turned again to Russia, and became a CSTO member. Lets not pretend Armenia had much of a choice between NATO and CSTO. The greater evil for them has always been Turkey, and that is the ally of the west. Not that Russia is a good guy, they haven't helped Armenia at all. But neither has the west, it has no moral high ground to stand on.
96 notes
·
View notes
Text
This is going to be my only contribution to Discourse for the foreseeable future: the fact that I now find myself having to check the Tumblr of people whose fics seem interesting on AO3 to make sure they're not a straight up war crimes denier/conspiracy theorist (any conflict, really, take your pick, but this was mainly prompted by Palestine) is incredibly upsetting and not good for my mental health. And stop trying to fandomize conflict when *real people* are dying. It's fucked up. If your activism doesn't recognize this very important detail it's not helping anyone.
Don't be posting completely monstrous things like "actually hostages are treated well" or "there's no evidence of sexual violence" or "actually all the people killed were killed by Israel" or telling Jews to "go back to Poland". What the fuck is wrong with you? This isn't helping people who are suffering. No one is benefiting from this! And neither is opposing a ceasefire because you think it'd let the IDF win. When people did this on Twitter they were called out by actual Palestinians for it because, again, this is real life, not a game. This isn't two sports teams playing against each other. People are dying every day.
On another note: as someone who saw her Syrian friends talk for years about the Assad regime grinding hundreds of thousands of people into dust, some of them being permanently silenced out of nowhere one day never to say another word because their life was snuffed out by a barrel bomb, if someone tried to make a fucked up "fandom" around the Syrian Revolution, I'd think they were an asshole. Do better. And don't you fucking dare heap praise on groups pretending to care about your cause when they're also still helping Assad kill more people. Fuck off with your praise for the Houthis, or Hezbollah, or the IRGC. I have lost friends to these murderers. Their claims to care about your cause are lies. They only care about human rights violations against Palestinians if they can be used as a prop to distract people from recognizing their own crimes against humanity.
I will not be lectured about how Hezbollah or Assad are friends of Palestinians when they slaughtered countless Palestinian refugees in Yarmouk. When Assad's father Hafez was a Syrian nationalist who openly stated that Palestinians were just Syrians, that there was no Palestinian people.
And please, for the love of G-d, don't fucking boost people like Rania Khalek, or Max Blumenthal, or Ben Norton, who cheerlead these mass murderers from one side of their mouth while pretending to care about civilians if they're Palestinians. If you see someone reposting some sort of Twitter bluecheck, please fucking do a background check, because for years Assadists have used Palestine as a way to do entryism into movements.
That's all I have to say. I left Twitter and made Tumblr my primary social media to get away from having to subject myself to the worst takes imaginable. This is my only return to anything that could be considered political I intend to do on this website. You will see no other posts remotely related to this topic from me. Don't ask me to make more. I've suffered enough damage to my mental health as a Jewish woman the past seven months.
27 notes
·
View notes
Text
[ 📸 Photos detailing the destruction caused by the Israeli occupation's bombing of the Al-Daraj Health Clinic (Al-Bandar clinic), in the Al-Daraj neighborhood, east of Gaza City, killing two Palestinians who were personnel for the Ministry of Health in the Gaza Strip. ]
🇮🇱⚔️🇵🇸 🚀🏘️💥🚑 🚨
262 DAYS OF GENOCIDE IN GAZA: ENTIRE FAMILIES WIPED OUT BY ISRAELI AIRSTRIKES, ISRAELI SUPREME COURT ORDERS DISCLOSURE OF THE STATUS OF GAZA PRISONERS, GENOCIDE CONTINUES UNABATED
On 262nd day of the Israeli occupation's ongoing special genocide operation in the Gaza Strip, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) committed a total of 3 new massacres of Palestinian families, resulting in the deaths of no less than 28 Palestinian civilians, mostly women and children, while another 66 others were wounded over the previous 24-hours.
It should be noted that as a result of the constant Israeli bombardment of Gaza's healthcare system, infrastructure, residential and commercial buildings, local paramedic and civil defense crews are unable to recover countless hundreds, even thousands, of victims who remain trapped under the rubble, or who's bodies remain strewn across the streets of Gaza.
This leaves the official death toll vastly undercounted as Gaza's healthcare officials are unable to accurately tally those killed and maimed in this genocide, which must be kept in mind when considering the scale of the mass murder.
The Israeli occupation Supreme Court has ordered the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to provide information on the status of and conditions of prisoners from the Gaza Strip, currently held at the Sde Teman detention center.
The Court also ordered the Netanyahu administration to include clarification of the kind of food provided to the detainees, along with details of the healthcare treatment they receive, methods of punishment used against Gaza prisoners, and the conditions of their restriction.
The order came in response to the inquiries submitted by human rights groups that have demanded the closure of the Sde Teman prison.
Citing Israeli newspaper Haaretz, the Palestinian media quotes an Israeli lawyer as saying that detaining prisoners in the Sde Teman prison center could amount to a war crime, adding that holding Palestinian prisoners there "cannot continue for another minute."
According to reporting, the Supreme Court made its decision despite of the opposition from National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who remains responsible for the Israeli prison system.
Haaretz also reported that government authorities had informed the Court back in June that they would "reduce the activity of Sde Teman prison," later announcing that it would close the detention center at the end of the month and is expected to transfer Palestinian prisoners to Israeli prisons or return the detainees to Gaza.
Following the closure of Sde Teman prison, the occupation authorities say the detention facility will continue to operate as a "primary screening facility for security detainees from the Gaza Strip."
According to the report, the Israeli entity had established the Sde Teman prison in the Negev desert following the start of the war in Gaza, beginning on October 7th, 2023, under the pretext of arresting fighters from the Islamic Resistance movement Hamas, but the facility was quickly filled by Palestinian civilians, with most kidnapped from shelters and hospitals in the Gaza Strip.
Back in December, Haaretz newspaper reported extensive rights violations and torture of detainees at the facility, stressing that the prisoners remained blindfolded and were being subjected to severe violence from interrogators and soldiers guarding them.
According to data from the Israeli occupation army, the Sde Teman prison center holds approximately 700 detainees, while the army claims to be investigating the deaths of some 36 Palestinian prisoners from the facility, most of whom were captured from the Gaza Strip.
In other news, the representative of UN Women in Palestine, Marcy Guimond, speaking on the social media platform X, warned that “Entire families have been wiped out in some air strikes in the Gaza Strip, and everyone you meet has terrible stories.”
Following her recent visit to the Gaza Strip, Guimond said that “you see destruction everywhere in Gaza, people living in destroyed buildings, people trying to get food and water, and then you see vast areas of tents.”
Going on, Guimond pointed to the wonton slaughter of the Israeli occupation forces, adding that the occupation army has killed "more than 10'000 women, including 6'000 mothers, leaving behind more than 19'000 orphaned children."
Guimond ended the post by adding that "it is time for this war to end."
Meanwhile, the Israeli occupation's war of genocide continues in Gaza, with random and intermittent bombing and shelling resulting in dozens of casualties over the previous day.
At the same time, sources with Kamal Adwan Hospital, in Beit Lahiya, announced the death of a young Palestinian girl as a result of starvation and dehydration.
According to local reporting, this brings the total number of children who've died as result of the Zionist occupation's ongoing campaign of starvation to 30.
Kamal Adwan Hospital confirmed that "dozens of children arrive to the hospital daily" suffering from malnutrition, and hunger has become widespread in the Palestinian enclave, as the Israeli entity continues preventing the entry of food items and limiting flour deliveries to the Strip.
At the same time, dozens of Palestinian children suffering from cancer in the northern Gaza Strip were transferred to Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Yunis, south of Gaza.
The move was made in coordination with international bodies in preperation for their travel through the Karm Abu Salem border crossing to Egypt to receive treatment.
Additionally, the Israeli occupation forces continued bombing and shelling residential neighborhoods and civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip, with violent raids targeting Gaza City, as well as other areas of the enclave.
In just the latest war crimes of the Israeli entity, Zionist warplanes bombed the Al-Daraj Health Center (Al-Bandar clinic), east of Gaza City, resulting in the deaths of two Palestinians working with the Ministry of Health, while several others were wounded in the strike.
The Ministry of Health later announced the death of A. Hani Al-Jaafrawi, Director of Ambulance and Emergency services in Gaza, as a result of the occupation's bombing of the Al-Daraj clinic.
In another war crime and atrocity, Israeli occupation fighter jets bombed the UNRWA's main headquarters in the Al-Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City, killing at least 8 civilians, including 5 members of aid securing committees.
In another assault, occupation forces bombed a gathering of civilians in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, southeast of Gaza City, resulting in the deaths of two Palestinians.
Israeli aircraft also opened fire in the vicinity of the Nabulsi Junction and the Sheikh Ajlin neighborhood, southwest of Gaza City, while two more civilians were killed as a result of the Israeli occupation's targeting of displaced Palestinian families in the regional camp to the north of the city, in addition to the wounding of at least 25 Palestinians.
Simultaneously, Zionist artillery shelling targeted west of the city of Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, while the occupation army also continued with its systematic destruction of the Saudi neighborhood, west of Rafah, using explosives to detonate entire city blocks.
Similarly, in central Gaza, several Palestinian civilians were wounded as a result of a bombing by the Zionist warplanes that targeted the Al-Bureij Camp.
In the meantime, a Palestinian woman was wounded along with several family members as a result of an occupation airstrike on the residential home belonging to the Mait family, also in the Bureij Camp, while two citizens were killed in the vicinity of the electric company, north of the Nuseirat Camp, in the central Gaza Strip.
Previously, a number of violent Israeli raids targeted the tents of displaced civilians in the Al-Mawasi area, in the central Gaza Strip.
In yet another horrific massacre, Zionist fighter jets bombed the headquarters of the Vocational Training College belonging to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), west of Gaza City, murdering no less than
8 Palestinians and wounding a number of others.
The slaughter didn't end there, following that massacre, the Israeli occupation army went on to bomb a house in the Al-Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City, resulting in the deaths of 9 civilians and wounding many others.
Simultaneously, local civil defense crews announced the recovery of three dead bodies and several wounded after occupation aircraft bombed a residential home belonging to the Ja'rour family, in the vicinity of the Dabit area of central Gaza City.
A young Palestinian man was killed as a result being shot by the occupation forces in the Al-Shoka neighborhood, east of the city of Rafah, south of Gaza, while at dawn today, an Israeli raid on a gathering of civilians north of the Nuseirat Camp killed one citizen and wounded several others.
Occupation fighter jets went on to bomb the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, southeast of Gaza City, while Zionist soldiers randomly open fire on civilians in various areas of Khan Yunis, south of Gaza, while detonating entire neighborhoods of Rafah.
According to sources in Gaza City, at least one Palestinian was killed as a result of an Israeli occupation bombing in the vicinity of Al-Sikka Street, east of the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, while Israeli artillery detatchments shelled civilians on Street 10, south of the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, as well as in the Sheikh Ajlin neighborhood, southwest of Gaza City.
Occupation artillery shelling and warplane bombing targeted the Al-Mughraqa area, north of the Bureij Camp, and north of the Nuseirat Camp in the central Gaza Strip, while occupation artillery shelling also pummeled the Brazil neighborhood, the Shaboura Camp, and the Tal al-Sultan neighborhood of the city of Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip.
Just prior to publishing, another report detailed another bombing, when occupation warplanes targeted a gathering of civilians in the Al-Shati Camp (Beach Camp), west of Gaza City, resulting in the deaths of 3 Palestinian civilians, while injuring a number of others.
According to local reporting, the Israeli occupation targeted civilians in the vicinity of the supply center in the Shaboura Camp, while the dead and wounded were transported to Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in the city.
As a result of the Israeli occupation's ongoing war of extermination in the Gaza Strip, the endlessly rising death toll now exceeds 37'626 Palestinians killed, including upwards of 10'000 women and over 15'000 children, while another 86'098 others have been wounded since the start of the current round of Zionist aggression, beginning with the events of October 7th, 2023.
June 24th, 2024.
#source1
#source2
#source3
#source4
#source5
#source6
#source7
#source8
#videosource
@WorkerSolidarityNews
#gaza#gaza news#gaza war#gaza genocide#war in gaza#genocide in gaza#genocide#israeli genocide#israeli war crimes#war crimes#crimes against humanity#israeli occupation forces#occupation#israeli occupation#war#palestine#palestine news#palestinians#free palestine#gaza conflict#israel palestine conflict#middle east#politics#news#geopolitics#international news#global news#breaking news#israel#current events
31 notes
·
View notes
Text
Undoubtedly the worst thing about Fyodor Pavlovich is that there is absolutely nothing which he holds as sacred, holy, untouchable, worthy of reverence or respect. Everything is a joke to him.
The very worst way this is exemplified is his alleged (but come on, we all know it was him) crime against the “holy fool” Lizaveta Smerdyashchaya, which for him was yet another distasteful joke. Lizaveta’s innocence and vulnerability are recognised by the community of Skotoprigonyevsk, both young and old, and we are given paragraphs and paragraphs to show how she is widely adored by the townspeople and how attempts are made to shelter, protect, and care for her.
When Fyodor Pavlovich violates her, he violates something that the community holds as sacred.
That, to me, is the core difference between someone like him and someone like Mitya. Even though Mitya has done a lot of “dirty things” and may on the surface appear to be following in his father’s footsteps, his heart is a noble one, or at least one with noble intentions. One that is filled with reverence and genuine emotion and a hatred for what is abhorrent—even when he himself is doing things that are abhorrent.
And even though we can fully understand his hatred of his father for his loathsomely mocking, irreverent, dishonourable, ignoble attitude toward everything, once his father is dead, he still feels sorry for that hatred. He still regrets the relationship he never had with the father who neglected him as a child and possibly swindled him as a young man. That alone speaks to the kind of heart that he has.
“It is a noble man you are speaking with, a most noble person; above all—do not lose sight of this—a man who has done a world of mean things, but who always was and remained a most noble person, as a person, inside, in his depths, well, in short, I don't know how to say it ... This is precisely what has tormented me all my life, that I thirsted for nobility, that I was, so to speak, a sufferer for nobility, seeking it with a lantern, Diogenes’ lantern, and meanwhile all my life I've been doing only dirty things, as we all do, gentlemen ... I mean, me alone, gentlemen, not all but me alone, I made a mistake, me alone, alone ... ! Gentlemen, my head aches,” he winced with pain. “You see, gentlemen, I did not like his appearance, it was somehow dishonorable, boastful, trampling on all that's holy, mockery and unbelief, loathsome, loathsome! But now that he's dead, I think differently.”
“How differently?”
“Not differently, but I'm sorry I hated him so much.”
“You feel repentant?”
“No, not really repentant, don't write that down. I'm not good myself, gentlemen, that's the thing, I'm not so beautiful myself, and therefore I had no right to consider him repulsive, that's the thing. Perhaps you can write that down.”
- The Brothers Karamazov, 3.9.3 (Pevear & Volokhonsky translation)
There is no beauty to be found in anything about Fyodor Pavlovich, and though Mitya contests that the same is true of himself, I argue differently. There is something beautiful in the struggle of an imperfect human toward nobility, despite being doomed to always fall short. To again and again slip into one’s baser impulses, and yet again and again stand back up and trudge onwards.
Both are human, but Fyodor Pavlovich is all of the very worst things about humanity, while Mitya is the worst things mingled with much of the very best.
#musings#the brothers karamazov#cw rape#tbk#fyodor pavlovich karamazov#dmitri karamazov#mitya karamazov#lizaveta smerdyashchaya#fyodor dostoevsky#братья карамазовы#tbk meta#brothers karamazov#russian lit#classic lit#classic literature#literary analysis#dostoevskij#dostoevsky#dostoyevsky#fedor dostoevskij#fyodor dostoyevsky#dmitri fyodorovich karamazov#fyodor pavlovich#analysis#literature#russian literature
48 notes
·
View notes
Note
I have being seeing the Mr Beast drama lately and apparently he broke one of ths geneva conventions??????
Apparently he didn't actually commit any war crimes, a former employee accused him of such because Mr Beast committed crimes against worker's rights and made some human rights violations during his videos.
Former employee Jake Weedle said that Mr Beast hired and defended a registered sex offender and that he also refused to turn the lights off during the challenge Jake was doing, causing him to be sleep deprived
Link of Jake Weddle's YouTube video: https://youtu.be/NHFvR0ArXPs?si=MUnV0eafOi2kQ4Q5
Link of the news report
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
This is the specific stance I have on whatever atrocities by Hamas you want me to consider.
You cannot expect me to believe that any fighting force is going to do any warfare without atrocities. You particularly will never, ever be able to convince me that fighting in civilian-populated areas will ever be free from sexual violence, from coercion, from civilian casualties. This is kind of just the nature of war - there is no such thing as a "good, clean war" and there never will be. Israel has committed plenty of human rights violations against Palestinians and whatever human rights violation you want me to worry about on October 7 has been done to Palestinians by Israeli soldiers. And it's also been done on every other population under military threat by every other military on the planet. Don't kid yourself.
What concerns me is not which side has "fought the cleanest" and what concerns me is also not which side is nicest. What specifically concerns me is the amount of control civilian populations are under and the way those civilian populations are being discussed. Each side has committed war crimes. I'm not going to bat for Hamas. But just like I expect you to stand in support of Israeli civilians who have done no wrong, I think there is something deeply wrong with you if you won't stand in support of Palestinian civilians who have done nothing wrong. And if you want to point to specific atrocities and war crimes that have been widespread on both sides as reason that Palestinian civilians should not be afforded the care Israeli citizens automatically are, then I think something is rotten in your heart.
I am also concerned by apartheid in general. Palestinians in the West Bank are subject to military law whereas Israelis in the West Bank are subject to civilian law. Reputable Israeli human rights organizations like B'tselem themselves have described Israeli laws pertaining to Palestinians (and other non-Jews in Israel, like the Druze people) as apartheid.
First and foremost in my heart I am a Jew. I was raised hoping one day to make my own home in Israel or Palestine, whatever you want to name it: the region itself is a place I see as the land of my forefathers. The part of my family I am closest to, care most about, and want to be connected to came to America from the Middle East in my grandparents' lifetimes. And I myself was raised in America, in a fundamentally flawed system with a long, bloody legacy of racism and violent settler-colonialism. For me, patriotism includes wanting the countries I care about to do better.
And at the moment Israel in its current incarnation has killed one in every 200 individuals in Gaza. Hamas's attack on October 7 was a tragedy - but they did not kill one in every 200 civilians in Israel. And they have not continued to kill tens or hundreds of civilians per day, and they have not committed to a siege of starvation on a mostly-civilian population. Israel's attacks on Gaza have targeted hospitals, schools, UN sites, and refugee camps. Israel will be able to recover from the October 7 attack. Most of Gaza's infrastructure lies in ruins.
History has taught us also that oppression will not last forever. One day the government in Israel will be overturned, and if it isn't, Palestinians will still be treated better and given a place in society. One way or another, the people of Palestine will be free. The mistreatment only promises that this freedom must be bought in Israeli blood- if there is no path forward but through Israel, then that will be the path that must be taken. And at the moment there is no path forward for the people of Gaza but through Israel. So I cannot find myself surprised that the people of Gaza are lashing out with violence, when history teaches us that this is always the case. And history also teaches us that in the years after, modern Israel will be spoken about wrapped in disclaimers of racism and Islamophobia and settler-colonialism the way America is now, or in tones of abject horror the way that Nazi Germany or Apartheid South Africa is now, depending on which way the tables turn for the current regime. Nelson Mandela, to the Western majority, was a terrorist involved in bombings before he was a hero.
I think it's rare that there's a situation this clear-cut in this day and age, where despite the tactics used by either side even a modicum of historical literacy tells you what must be done and what side needs more support. The people of Gaza are without food, without water, without safe shelter, under a four-day ceasefire that will pick back up after it's left off unless something changes and under a military blockade even if the ceasefire is permanent holding them in a cramped, besieged location. Travel for Palestinians is difficult and requires approval from both local Palestinian authorities and Israeli administrative groups; travel for Israeli citizens is significantly easier. And in the West Bank, Palestinians are under threat.
This doesn't even touch on the horrendous, genocidal remarks from Israeli government leaders. I'm not repeating the remarks verbatim, because there are too many: read them for yourself here. It's kind of really obvious that Hamas itself is not ever going to take over Israel if you're paying attention. But Israel exerts a lot of control over Gaza. Calling civilians cockroaches, subhumans, and human animals and then shelling them for more than a month straight is pretty fucking bad.
Free Palestine. Justice for the Palestinians.
#red rambles#i also have strong objections to zionism and its fundamental precepts#but that's not really relevant#gaza
53 notes
·
View notes