#corporate social responsability

[queenofthequillandink]

I think a massive facet of Tim's secret identity should be that everyone in Gotham knows that if Tim had Bat Skills, he would simply be a benevolent supervillain instead. A feral little gremlin who would take out the kneecaps of every boomer trying to embezzle charity funds. Like, this is the bitch that's constantly ready to fight God in a Denny's parking lot. He would be out there committing murder every time someone tried to rezone Gotham's voting districts again; he'd just show up in their dark living room with anime eyeshine like, "oh? And you thought you could get away with this? 🔪"

[nellasbookplanet]

The funniest kind of critical role "critique" is always going to be the 'they present themselves as if they aren’t rich/a company no I will not give any examples' crowd. Like what does this even mean. They start literally every single episode with informing you they are professional voice actors. They have clearly advertised sponsors. They have an entire line of merch and an animated show. The production value of the set is bonkers. They run a charity foundation. Do you want them to start every episode with a blaring siren and a warning saying 'beware! company run content! we make money!!' Are you just angry that they are friends having fun as they make a living. Do you have any understanding of how money works.

[priafey]

things the US needs to address:

the collective psychosis that leads people to make posts like these

[mtstorrs]

Weyland-Yutain and neither confirm or deny what happened with the Nostromo. But they can make you a better manager

[omegaphilosophia]

The Relationship Between Responsibility and Power

The relationship between responsibility and power is a significant topic in philosophy, ethics, and political theory, encapsulating the idea that with greater power comes greater responsibility. This relationship explores how power, which is the ability or capacity to influence or control others and outcomes, inherently involves responsibility—the duty to act ethically, justly, and in the best interests of those affected by one’s actions.

Key Aspects of the Relationship Between Responsibility and Power:

Ethical Obligation:

Moral Duty: Those who hold power are often seen as having a moral duty to use it responsibly. This means making decisions that consider the well-being of others, the potential consequences of actions, and the ethical implications of those actions. The greater the power, the more significant the impact of one’s decisions, and thus the greater the responsibility to act ethically.

Justice and Fairness: Power carries with it the responsibility to promote justice and fairness. This includes ensuring that power is not used arbitrarily or oppressively, and that those in power are held accountable for their actions.

Accountability:

Answerability: Responsibility involves being answerable for the exercise of power. This means that those in positions of power should be transparent about their actions and decisions, and should be willing to justify them to those affected. Accountability mechanisms, such as checks and balances, are often put in place to ensure that power is exercised responsibly.

Consequences of Power: When power is misused or abused, the responsible party should face appropriate consequences. This is crucial for maintaining trust and integrity in any system where power is distributed.

Political and Social Power:

Governance: In political philosophy, the relationship between power and responsibility is fundamental to concepts of governance and leadership. Leaders are expected to use their power to serve the public good, protect rights, and promote the common welfare. Failures in these responsibilities can lead to loss of legitimacy and authority.

Social Influence: Individuals or groups with social power (e.g., celebrities, influencers, or institutions) also bear responsibility for how their words and actions influence public opinion, social norms, and behaviors. This includes the ethical responsibility to avoid spreading misinformation or promoting harmful ideologies.

Power Dynamics:

Imbalances of Power: When there are significant imbalances of power, the responsibility to act ethically becomes even more pronounced. Those with greater power have a duty to ensure that they do not exploit or oppress those with less power. This principle is central to discussions of social justice, human rights, and equity.

Empowerment: Responsibility also involves the obligation to empower others, particularly those who are marginalized or disadvantaged. This can mean sharing power, enabling others to make decisions, and creating conditions where all individuals can exercise their rights and responsibilities.

Philosophical Perspectives:

Spiderman Principle ("With great power comes great responsibility"): Popularized by the Spider-Man comics, this phrase encapsulates the ethical maxim that those who wield significant power must do so with a strong sense of responsibility. It reflects the idea that power should be used for the greater good, rather than personal gain.

Existentialist Views: Existentialist philosophers, such as Jean-Paul Sartre, emphasize that individuals are responsible for the freedom and choices they possess. Power in this context is seen as the capacity to shape one’s own life and the lives of others, with a profound responsibility to make authentic and ethical choices.

Corporate Responsibility:

Corporate Power: In the context of business and corporations, the relationship between power and responsibility is often discussed in terms of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Companies with significant economic and social power are expected to act responsibly toward their employees, consumers, communities, and the environment.

Ethical Leadership: Corporate leaders have a responsibility to use their power to create ethical cultures within their organizations, promote sustainability, and ensure that their business practices do not harm society.

Personal Responsibility:

Power Over Self: On an individual level, everyone has some degree of power over their own actions and decisions. Personal responsibility involves using this power to make ethical choices, consider the impact of one’s actions on others, and take responsibility for the consequences.

Empathy and Compassion: Exercising power responsibly often requires empathy and compassion—understanding the needs and perspectives of others, and using one’s power to support and uplift rather than dominate or harm.

The relationship between responsibility and power is a foundational concept in ethics and philosophy, underscoring the idea that those who have the ability to influence or control others must exercise their power with a strong sense of moral duty, accountability, and justice. This relationship is critical to ensuring that power is used in ways that promote the common good, protect the vulnerable, and maintain social and ethical integrity.

[captain-casual]

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Sam Delgado at Vox:

Over the last century, people have started demanding more from the businesses where they shop. Whether it be a pair of jeans or the food on their plates, consumers want to know that what they’re buying isn’t just good quality but also ethically and sustainably made. In the early 20th century, groups like the National Consumers League and the now-defunct League of Women Shoppers organized consumers to take advantage of their power in an effort to improve labor protections and the rights of workers in the United States. Today, ethically minded consumers are also motivated by climate change and animal rights, as the consequences of our overconsumption have become clearer.

Fast-forward 90 years and the global marketplace has become exponentially more complex. Globalization has remade how and where corporations make products. If it was difficult for activists at the turn of the 20th century to identify ethically made products, the challenge to the modern consumer is even greater. You might think regulations or legislation could compel companies to produce more ethically made goods. But ultimately, no one government is responsible for a supply chain that crosses borders and oceans. In a globalized economy, nobody is in charge. So “corporate social responsibility” — or the idea that companies can hold themselves accountable — emerged, responding to this consumer demand. In practice, corporate social responsibility can look like companies donating to charities every year, committing to net-zero emissions by a certain date, or focusing on labor practices. To prove they’re doing this work, companies will partner with nonprofits or hire third-party consultants to audit their supply chains, and then measure and report their progress in annual reports, press releases, and on their websites.

[...] Corporate social responsibility went mainstream during the new wave of globalization and the growth of multinational corporations that followed in the second half of the 20th century. As these businesses expanded their reach and production speed, they sought to cut their costs by contracting cheaper labor in other countries with weak worker protections. This idea of outsourcing wasn’t necessarily new. Businesses in the US already had a history of moving to Southern states where they knew corporate regulation was more relaxed and labor would be less expensive, made possible by the racist legacy of slavery and Jim Crow laws. A century later, new technology — particularly the internet — made it even easier for companies to scale up and outsource their operations. By moving overseas, companies could obscure unsafe working conditions from American consumers, who might’ve known very little about how their products were being made.

But public awareness of the costs of globalization started to grow in the early 1990s, thanks to stories and reports from human rights organizations and newsrooms that laid out the abysmal working conditions and standards of major brands, often in their factories overseas. Nike, the world’s biggest shoe seller, faced backlash after multiple stories came out about grueling conditions and the use of child labor in its contracted factories, sparking boycotts and protests against Nike from consumers and activists alike. Businesses saw how consumers could rise against them if they weren’t careful about what went on in their supply chains, leading to more companies developing their own voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives to address their environmental and social impacts.

Today, corporate social responsibility programs are widespread. They often refer to commitments a company makes toward a particular area of social impact, like diversity, ethical sourcing, or the environment. It usually looks like this: A company will set goals around one or more of these areas, assess its progress, and then publish its results. To legitimize these programs, companies will hire social auditing firms, seek certifications from multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) like the Fair Labor Association or Fair Trade to show they meet certain standards, or develop codes of conduct around labor and human rights. Such programs matter to consumers, and they’re willing to pay more for sustainably made products — and hey, if something is good for both the world and for business, what’s the harm?

Corporate social responsibility in practice

Corporate social responsibility is everywhere today, driven by consumer demand and a growing socially conscious workforce. One 2023 study found that over 80 percent of companies are increasing their budgets for sustainability initiatives. Chief sustainability officers are now common, and more companies are disclosing the exact factories their products are made in and the reported conditions. But it’s hard to know how honest or effective these programs really are at protecting labor and the environment. Part of the issue is they’re voluntary. While companies must comply with local, federal, and international laws, that’s the end of their legal obligations. Beyond that, there’s no requirement for corporate social responsibility programs to show their methodology or metrics for calculating their progress and no obligation to release all results from a social audit. A company can change its corporate social responsibility programs at any point, or drop them entirely. [...]

The rise of worker-driven social responsibility

Around the same time that corporate social responsibility was taking off in the 1990s, a group of farmworkers in a rural Florida town called Immokalee had a meeting that would challenge the status quo, from the bottom of the supply chain all the way to the top. The farmworkers were Mexican, Guatemalan, and Haitian migrants, and they harvested buckets of tomatoes in grueling conditions for as long as 12 hours a day, receiving poverty wages for providing crucial produce to US grocery stores and restaurants. The fields they worked in were rife with verbal and physical abuse, sexual harassment, wage theft, and, in the worst cases, involuntary servitude. Tired of the exploitation they encountered in the fields, the Immokalee farmworkers discussed how they could really change the way things were done. This 1993 meeting marked the beginning of the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) and, later on, the first ever worker-driven social responsibility program. Lucas Benitez, one of the founders of the CIW, told me that, at first, the farmworkers thought their employers, the tomato growers, had all the power. “Then we came to see and recognize what was essentially an invisible hand that was putting that pressure further and further down on the supply chain,” Benitez said via an interpreter. “That started at the top, because it’s those retailers that fundamentally dictate to growers the conditions under which that food is being produced. And so that’s really where the power lay, and so that’s where we turned.” In 2001, the CIW set its sights on Taco Bell and called for a boycott over the reportedly abysmal conditions in its tomato supply chain. Four years later, Taco Bell signed an agreement that included vital demands from the CIW: Taco Bell would pay a premium for its tomatoes that would go directly to workers’ paychecks, it would only buy from growers who met the code of conduct that protected workers, and this would be monitored and enforced by an investigative body with help from the CIW. It was all backed by a legally binding contract. A binding contract is crucial to worker-driven social responsibility, a sharp contrast to those toothless corporate social responsibility initiatives.

Vox takes a look at the worker-driven social responsibility trend.

[liyazaki]

.

[ishika-explores]

"Marpu Foundation's Role in Shaping Corporate Responsibility"

In today's dynamic world, the line between profit and purpose is fading, giving rise to a new era of corporate social responsibility (CSR). It's no longer just about making money; it's about making a difference. Imagine a world where businesses not only excel in their industries, but also uplift communities, champion environmental sustainability, and foster social equality. This is the inspiring reality that the Marpu Foundation , led by national youth awardee Mr. Kadigiri Raghu vamsi, is striving to create through innovative partnerships with forward-thinking corporations. In this article, we'll explore how these collaborations are reshaping the CSR landscape, driving meaningful change, and setting a new standard for what it means to be a responsible corporate citizen. Let's dive in and discover how these visionary initiatives are transforming the business world for the better!

Corporate social responsibility is a hot topic, and according to the United Nations it's all about businesses stepping up to make a positive impact on society, the environment, and their stakeholders. CSR represents the commitment of businesses to contribute to the well-being of the community from which they derive their resources.

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development defines corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a commitment by businesses to contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families, as well as that of the community and society at large.

"Marpu" is a transformational non-governmental organization that amplifies the voices of unheard individuals. In 2020, it was recognized as the best NGO in India and has established strong partnerships with prestigious organizations to collectively fulfil corporate social responsibilities. The Marpu Foundation runs various impactful projects focusing on sustainable development goals, volunteerism, and innovative solutions such as ecological awareness. With a presence in 15 states and 39 locations, the organization is dedicated to achieving environmental, economic, and social development goals, as well as fostering partnerships for overall progress. It emphasizes the equilibrium between social responsibility and business, offering diverse opportunities for philanthropy through donations, corporate partnerships, volunteering, internships for skill development, and community service experiences.

With a clear vision, @marpufoundation is dedicated to making a positive impact on society by providing valuable insights and setting great examples for all. This involves fostering a meaningful exchange of services between society and development, creating a better future for all involved.

[freckleslikestars]

Not enough leather in sci-fi these days

[qosood]

a única notificação do microsoft teams que eu gosto é de quando uma reunião é remarcada

[echoandinsights]

Maximizing the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Partnership with Marpu Foundation

Uniting Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Goals for a Sustainable Future In the landscape of modern business, combining Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainability Goals (SDG) is not just a trend, but a strategic one necessity. The Marpu Foundation, with its innovative approach to sustainable development, is a beacon for companies that are trying to strengthen the impact of their social responsibility.

The Synergy Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development Goals

CSR initiatives are no longer limited to charity; they are strategic business needs that align with the broader goals of Sustainable Development. The synergy of social responsibility and sustainability goals is based on their shared vision of a sustainable future. Corporate Social Responsibility is a means by which companies can contribute to the global agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals, which encompasses a range of goals from poverty alleviation to environmental protection.

Marpu Foundation's Unique Approach

Marpu Foundation has created a niche market for CSR by adopting an empathetic approach to sustainability. Their mission is to harness the human potential for positive change and adhere to several Sustainable Development Goals, including clean water and sanitation, affordable and clean energy and quality education.

Success Stories That Inspire

Marpu Foundation's success stories are proof of its effective model. They were recognized at the 2022 NGO Awards as "NGO of the Year - Power Environment", underscoring their commitment to environmental protection and sustainability. More than 12 million volunteers participated in their projects, demonstrating the power of collective action to achieve the goals of sustainable development.

Impact of Collaboration

The collaboration between companies and the Marpu Foundation can lead to impressive CSR initiatives that not only meet the company's goals, but also significantly contribute to the achievement of sustainability goals. Marpu's broad reach and strong partnerships enable them to meet various CSR goals, meaningfully engage employees and create value for all stakeholders.

Conclusion: Crafting a Sustainable Legacy Partnering with the Marpu Foundation offers companies the opportunity to be part of the change. By connecting CSR with the Sustainable Development Goals, companies can create a legacy of sustainability that resonates with consumers, investors and communities alike. It's time to embrace this synergy and make a lasting impact on our world.

Always Remember that, “We make a living by what we get, But we make our life by what we give”

To learn more about how your company can partner with the Marpu Foundation, visit their website or follow their social media channels for the latest updates and success stories.

[omegaphilosophia]

The Impact of Extreme Wealth on Society: Unraveling the Complex Web

In the 21st century, the issue of wealth inequality has reached unprecedented levels. The ultra-rich, a minuscule fraction of the global population, possess a staggering amount of wealth, often equivalent to that of entire countries. While wealth accumulation isn't inherently problematic, the concentration of extreme wealth in the hands of a few has far-reaching consequences for society. In this blog post, we'll explore how the ultra-rich have contributed to many of the problems we face today.

Wealth Inequality: Perhaps the most obvious consequence of extreme wealth is the exacerbation of wealth inequality. The gap between the richest and the rest has grown to alarming proportions. This inequality can lead to social unrest and hinder economic growth by limiting opportunities for the majority.

Economic Disparities: Extreme wealth often translates into disproportionate economic power. This can result in monopolistic practices, which stifle competition and innovation. Smaller businesses struggle to compete, leading to fewer choices for consumers.

Social Issues: Wealth inequality contributes to a host of social issues, including reduced access to education, healthcare, and housing for marginalized communities. It also perpetuates cycles of poverty that are difficult to escape.

Power and Influence: The ultra-rich have outsized political influence. They can shape public policies to their advantage, often at the expense of the common good. This undermines the democratic principles upon which many societies are built.

Corporate Dominance: Many of the wealthiest individuals are tied to large corporations. Their influence over these entities can lead to decisions that prioritize profits over environmental responsibility or workers' rights.

Political Lobbying: Lobbying efforts by the ultra-rich can influence legislation in their favor. This can result in tax breaks for the wealthy, further exacerbating wealth inequality.

Tax Evasion: Some of the ultra-rich engage in tax evasion schemes, depriving governments of revenue needed for essential public services. This places a heavier burden on ordinary taxpayers.

Public Policy: The ultra-rich can use their influence to push for policies that benefit them financially, such as reduced regulations or favorable trade agreements. These policies may not align with the best interests of society as a whole.

Poverty Alleviation: While philanthropy is common among the wealthy, it often falls short of addressing systemic issues. Charity, while commendable, cannot replace comprehensive government programs aimed at poverty alleviation.

Social Responsibility: Extreme wealth can lead to a detachment from the daily struggles of ordinary people. This lack of empathy can hinder efforts to address pressing social and economic challenges.

The impact of extreme wealth on society is a multifaceted issue. While it's crucial to acknowledge the positive contributions of wealthy individuals, it's equally important to scrutinize the consequences of concentrated wealth and power. Addressing these issues requires thoughtful public policy, increased transparency, and a commitment to a more equitable society. By recognizing the challenges posed by extreme wealth, we can work towards a more just and inclusive future for all.

[deetherusalka]

Fucking I hate that economic geography is one of my strongest suites

[justashadetalkative]

Details: Phosa & Linast

Mundane video technology hits something not unlike an uncanny valley for Phosa & Linast on two fronts:

1) Their spacial awareness is intense and encompasses the electromagnetic field around them, so trying to process 2D images as representations of 3D objects & space was a learning curve for them. Even after they learned the trick of it, it’s still more like viewing an autostereogram than anything natural or automatic. (They have to trick themselves into perceiving it as looking at something that is very far away and outside of themselves, even as it's (usually) radiating from inside their range of perception.) 2) They don't have a brain that smooths a rapid sequence of images into a perception of smooth motion for them, and while their conscious processing speed isn't precise or rapid enough for them to truly discern the actual movement of light through space (unless working with large enough distances), they can still sense it to some degree. Between those two factors, it's like touching a vibrating surface; they sure as heck couldn't count the individual jerks, but they can feel that something about the motion isn’t smooth.

Some of these factors were mitigated during that human incident, and it went a long way towards helping them figure out how to interpret 2D images the way most sighted humans do.