#corporate law department
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Link
Manage legal business risks and complying with regulations is one of core activities to mitigate risk. Organizations can grow widely with the help of enterprise software and can, having a ELM solution can eliminate the risk of chaos, delay in work and simplify your work significantly.
#elm software#elm solution#enterprise software#enterprise legal management#enterprise legal software#enterprise legal management software#enterprise legal management solutions#best enterprise legal management software#corporate legal department#corporate law department#legal department management#law department management#software for law department#software for legal department
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
How to earn an amount of monies 3 times bigger than all employees can earn?
An online business can allow you to do it.
Remember:
1) An education is a basis of all qualifications.
2) A required qualification meets a work`s description based on a law.
3) A recruiter based on a recruitment can qualify an employee based on a profession to work, or make a person unqualified according to the profession.
A fraud is based on an artificial vacancy to keep an artificial cashflow in order to defraud an amount of monies from an organized crime.
SB agents in Poland are doing it, and they have false documents.
Due to a fact a profession is a leverage to build a wealth upon, you can work in a community of the same profession in order to provide a service in a correct manner.
All those who represent a brand name that is incorrect can be proven guilty of doing a fraud, and can be qualified for a confiscation of a property, partly, or completely, depending on an amount of monies they used from an organized crime.
If you want a sales training for a sales team, write there I want the sales training.
#An economy#A complaint#A consumer#Consumers#A law#Privacy rights#An online business#A sales training#Salespeople#A sales community#A salesperson#A salesman#A saleswoman#A sales department#A sales manager#Entrepreneurs#A corporation#A market#A Council
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
''60 years making peace through Law '' World Law Congress 2023.
The World Law Congress is a two-day event where global leaders, including heads of State, justices, policy makers, academics, lawyers, activists, and students, discuss a wide variety of current topics to which the legal community should propose solutions.
The Opening Session New York will serve as the framework for the in-person press presentation of the World Law Congress. The program includes a panel of discussion on Rule of Law, Corporate Governance & Climate Change as well as the bestowing of the WJA Medals of Honor to distinguished personalities.
#Rule of Law#Corporate Governance#Climate Change#jurists#WJA Medals of Honor#panel discussion#World law Congress#Department of Global Communications
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Labor Department Issues Notice to Tata Motors Jamshedpur
Management summoned over paramedical staff complaints of wage stagnation and lack of medical benefits Union alleges ‘bonded labor’ conditions for long-serving hospital employees JAMSHEDPUR – The Labor Department has issued a notice to Tata Motors’ Jamshedpur management following complaints about the treatment of paramedical staff at the company’s hospital. Labor Superintendent-1 Avinash Thakur…
View On WordPress
#बिजनेस#business#industrial relations Jamshedpur#Jamshedpur corporate accountability#Jamshedpur paramedical staff#Jharkhand Labor Department action#Jharkhand labor law enforcement#labor rights Jharkhand#Sanyukt Yuva Sangh complaint#Tata Motors employee welfare#Tata Motors Hospital employee issues#Tata Motors labor dispute
0 notes
Text
#Corporate Legal Department#Legal Operations Management#Technology Solutions for Legal Ops#Legal Ops Technology Solutions#Legal Ops Solution#Legal Ops Software Solutions#Software for Legal Ops#In-house Legal#Law Department#AI for Legal Ops#AI for Corporate Legal Team#Legal Ops Eco System
0 notes
Text
Disney vs. DeSantis is so funny because it's like. Neither side even wanted to get into this. Here's how it's supposed to go: Politician does something stupid. Corporation disavows politician after public pressure. Politician disavows the disavowing. Nothing changes for either party.
But then the Florida governor got stars in his eyes. He saw an opportunity to bolster his standing before the presidential primary. He wanted to be the one who took on The Mouse and won. So in retaliation he decides he's going to tear down the decades-old agreement Disney uses to govern Disney World's district.
And just like that, Disney's batshit insane legal department turns towards Florida like the Eye of Sauron spotting the ring at Mount Doom. They smell lost profit. They smell blood.
Disney will use any and every strategy they've accumulated over the last century of lobbying congress and DeSantis can't back down lest he admit Mickey Mouse beat his ass. He's lost control of Disney World's district even more than he already did. Now he's getting sued.
This all started because Disney was pressured into backtracking their political contributions to Florida and disavowing the Don't Say Gay law. Now they're fighting for something they actually care about: their profit margin. Disney is not an ally to queer people and they're an enemy to progressives, but damn am I rooting for them to keep humiliating the greater evil for the time being. This is high comedy.
74K notes
·
View notes
Text
I hate the idea that a company should always be in growth mode and that mass layoffs, sorry, restructuring is something that should happen at set intervals. Steady profits are still profits and people will be less inclined to work or get invested in their work if they have to keep an emergency backup job in the back pocket no matter how good their work is.
To say nothing about how it limits social bonding 'cause there's only so many times you can go through seeing friends lose their job and have survivor's guilt or vice versa, or how since it's a known occurrence it means you know you're competing directly with friends.
Of course that's the point, along with the business idea that employment should follow the Pareto Principle even though it's pop science, demonstrably false, and an intentional misunderstanding of what was really an observation of coincidences.
And of course that means you're constantly shedding people who have knowledge, skills, and training to "streamline" things or to "increase production speed" when overworking already overworked employees and throwing greenhorns into it does the exact opposite.
It's not about making the company better, it's about making unionizing harder, paying people less, making it seem like the company is doing something, and giving the execs and shareholders more money.
While overworking those who kept their jobs.
#and how many times has a company bragged about how much money it made#only to turn around and fire a bunch of workers (but never execs)?#maybe even given themselves massive congratulatory bonuses to celebrate their 'hard work'#which was actually the work of dozens/hundreds of others#and iirc the pareto principle observation varied wildly from something like 5% to 50%#but it got turned into 80-20 for round numbers and because who cares about nuance#just sell it as 20% of your employees are slacking no matter what so you should fire 20% regularly#and of course there's the little thing known as fiduciary responsibility that's been warped by capitalism#so execs prioritize shareholders above all else#and of course the same companies often complain how no one wants to work anymore#or laments how people right out of college don't have a decade plus of experience with the company's proprietary system(s)#and sometimes they try to sneak no compete clauses into employment contracts so if someone is fired#they may have to stay out of the industry they have experience/training/degrees/interest in#no that such clauses can be enforced for something like this but it's a threat and warning to further cow workers#and a company bragging about making billions in profit and has a whole legal department#can easily afford the time and legal fees compared to someone who just lost their job even if they know they're going to lose#corporations literally have money earmarked in their budget for fines and settlements#which should tell you all you need to know about how much they care about laws#it's not even an emergency 'we fucked up' fund#it's 'this is the cost of business because it's cheaper to pay the fine and do what we want' fund
0 notes
Text
CREATE Law attracts over P1 trillion worth of investments
While it is still uncertain as to how much the Philippine economy will grow by the end of this new year, over a trillion Pesos of investments were attracted by means of project approvals under the Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises (CREATE) Law, according to a news article published by the Philippine News Agency (PNA). To put things in perspective, posted below is an excerpt…
View On WordPress
#Asia#Blog#blogger#blogging#Bongbong Marcos#business#business news#capitalism#Carlo Carrasco#commerce#Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises (CREATE)#CREATE Law#Department of Finance (DOF)#economics#economy#Economy of the Philippines#Ferdinand Marcos#finance#geek#investing#investment#investments#jobs#Marcos#money#news#PBBM#Philippine News Agency (PNA)#Philippines#Philippines blog
0 notes
Text
Further reading:
HKFP: Leader of Hong Kong opposition party fined HK$1,000 for collecting money in public place without permit, March 17, 2023
HKFP: HSBC terminates bank accounts of Hong Kong opposition party League of Social Democrats without giving reason, June 2, 2023
#Hongkong Shanghai Banking Corporation#Dickson Chau#League of Social Democrats#Hong Kong#politics#political repression#Chan Po Ying#National Security Department#hong kong national security law#Hang Seng Bank#Bank of China#Raphael Wong#PayPal#Leung Kwok Hung#hong kong free press
0 notes
Text
Microsoft to pay $3.3M to resolve violations of US export controls, sanctions
New Post has been published on https://www.timesoftehran.com/microsoft-to-pay-3-3m-to-resolve-violations-of-us-sanctions/
Microsoft to pay $3.3M to resolve violations of US export controls, sanctions
New York (The Times Groupe)- U.S.-based multinational technology corporation Microsoft is imposed a total of $3.3 million in civil penalties for its alleged and apparent violations of US export controls and sanctions laws, Treasury and Commerce departments said Thursday in a joint statement. ofac bis
According to the statement, Microsoft self-disclosed the alleged violations to the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
It added that the tech firm cooperated with the joint investigation conducted by BIS and OFAC, and took remedial measures after discovering the conduct at issue, which predated the export controls and sanctions imposed in connection with Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine.
While BIS imposed an administrative penalty of more than $600,000 on Microsoft involving its subsidiary Microsoft Rus LLC, or Microsoft Russia, the company also settled with OFAC and agreed to an almost $3 million civil penalty to resolve 1,339 violations of sanctions regulations involving Ukraine/Russia, Cuba, Iran, and Syria.
Microsoft was given a $276,000 credit by BIS, contingent upon Microsoft fulfilling its requirements under the OFAC settlement agreement, according to the statement.
“U.S. companies will be held accountable for the activities of their foreign subsidiaries,” said Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Matthew S. Axelrod. “As this coordinated resolution demonstrates, BIS and OFAC will work together to ensure that U.S. export control and sanctions laws are enforced effectively, wherever in the world the underlying conduct occurs.”
Employees of Microsoft Russia caused another Microsoft subsidiary to enter into or sell software licensing agreements that would allow the transfer or access to software on seven occasions between December 2016, and December 2017, said the Treasury.
OFAC Director Andrea Gacki said Microsoft’s case underscores the risks technology companies may face when engaging through foreign subsidiaries, distributors, and resellers.
#Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Matthew S. Axelrod#civil penalties#Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)#Cuba#Iran#Microsoft Rus LLC#multinational technology corporation Microsoft#OFAC Director Andrea Gacki#Russia#Russia war in Ukraine#Syria#Treasury and Commerce departments#Ukraine#US export controls and sanctions laws#US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)#Politics
1 note
·
View note
Text
How to Structure Your In-House Legal Department for Smooth Workflows
Is your in-house legal department bogged down by inefficiencies? Discover how to optimize your team's structure for smoother workflows. Our guide explores effective role definition, workload management, and clear communication strategies. Empower your legal team to achieve peak performance!
#in house legal department structure#corporate legal department structure#in house legal team structure#legal operations team structure#in house legal department hierarchy#corporate law department structure#corporate legal team structure#management structure of a corporation#legal department structure#legal team structure#structure#legal team#legal#team
1 note
·
View note
Video
youtube
Project 2025: The MAGA Plan to Take Your Freedom
A second Trump term would be more dangerous than the first — in part because of something called Project 2025, a plan to extend Trump’s grip into every part of your life.
Trump’s gross incompetence in his first term wasn’t all bad. It kept some of his most extreme goals out of reach. That’s why his inner circle, including more than 20 officials from his first term, have written a step-by-step playbook to make a second term brutally efficient.
At nearly a thousand pages, it’s longer than most Stephen King novels, and a lot scarier. The Associated Press wasn’t kidding when they called it “a plan to dismantle the US government and replace it with Trump’s vision,”
Project 2025 is a road map to ban abortion, give greedy corporate oligarchs everything they want, and strip Americans of our most basic freedoms — all without needing any support from Congress.
There’s more to it than I can get into, but here are three things I want you to know.
#1 How would Project 2025 work?
Every nonpartisan government agency would be turned into an arm of the MAGA agenda.
Some of the worst things Trump reportedly tried to do as president — like having the military shoot protesters or seize voting machines to overturn the election — were only stopped because sensible leaders in the military or the professional civil service refused to go along with it.
In a second term, there would be no sensible leaders in the military or professional civil service because Trump would fire anyone more loyal to the Constitution than to him.
Trump started the process in October 2020 with an executive order that would have let him fire tens of thousands of civil servants and replace them with MAGA henchmen. I’m talking about traditionally non-political positions, like scientists at scientific agencies and accountants at the IRS.
Trump could not act on the executive order then because he lost the election. If he wins now, he’s pledged to pick up where he left off and go further…
TRUMP: …making every executive branch employee fireable by the President of the United States.
#2 Project 2025 is about controlling Americans’ lives & bodies
Restricting abortion is such a big part of Project 2025 that the word “abortion” appears 198 times in the plan.
Trump largely made good on his campaign promise to ban abortion.
Thanks to Trump’s Supreme Court justices, 1 in 3 American women of childbearing age live in states with abortion bans. Project 2025 would make that even worse, without needing new laws from Congress.
Page 458 of the playbook calls for a MAGA-controlled FDA to reject medical science and reverse approval of the medications used in 63% of all abortions, effectively banning them.
Page 455 plans “abortion surveillance” and the creation of a registry that could put people who cross state lines to get an abortion at risk of prosecution.
Another way around Congress is to enforce arcane laws that are still technically on the books. Page 562 plans for a MAGA-controlled Justice Department to enforce the Comstock Act of 1873, which bans the mailing of “anything designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion.” This could be used to block the shipment of any medications or medical instruments needed for abortions.
But Project 2025’s control of American families goes even further. It plans for government agencies to define life as beginning at conception — a position at odds with the process used for in vitro fertilization.
Page 451 declares that “Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society,” thereby stigmatizing single parents, same-sex couples, unmarried coparents, and childless couples.
Project 2025 even takes a stand against adoption, declaring on p. 489 that “all children have a right to be raised by the men and women who conceived them.”
#3 Project 2025 would turn America into a police state.
Maybe you live in a blue city or state, where you think plans like arresting teachers and librarians over banned books (which is on p. 5) could never happen. Well, guess again.
Trump has said one of the big things he’d do differently in a second term is override mayors and governors to take over local law enforcement.
Page 553 lays out how to do this, and even plans for Trump’s Justice Department to prosecute district attorneys he disagrees with.
Immigration enforcement is to be conducted like a war, with the military deployed within the U.S., and millions of undocumented immigrants rounded up and placed into newly constructed holding camps. This is outlined starting on p. 139.
Members of the Project 2025 team also reportedly told the Washington Post about plans to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military against anti-Trump protests.
There is much more to Project 2025. There are more than a hundred pages of anti-environmental policies that would help Trump make good on what he reportedly promised to do for oil executives if they contribute a billion dollars to his reelection. It would make drilling and mining a top national priority while killing clean energy projects, barring the EPA from regulating carbon emissions, and replacing all government climate scientists with climate deniers.
There are even cartoonishly cruel plans like slaughtering wild horses. Yes, that’s really in there on p. 528.
I thought I understood the stakes of this election, but reading this plan… Well, it gave me chills. If Trump gets the chance to put this plan into place, he will. The country it would turn America into would be hard for any of us to recognize.
964 notes
·
View notes
Text
A big cost and concern for many seniors in the U.S. is the price of prescription drugs and other healthcare expenses—and this year, thanks to The Inflation Reduction Act, their costs may go down dramatically, especially for patients fighting cancer or heart disease.
I learned about the new benefits because my ‘Medicare birthday’ is coming up in a couple months when I turn 65. I was shocked that there were so many positive changes being made, which I never heard about on the news.
Thousands of Americans on Medicare have been paying more than $14,000 a year for blood cancer drugs, more than $10,000 a year for ovarian cancer drugs, and more than $9,000 a year for breast cancer drugs, for instance.
That all changed beginning in 2023, after the Biden administration capped out-of-pocket prescriptions at $3,500—no matter what drugs were needed. And this year, in 2024, the cap for all Medicare out-of-pocket prescriptions went down to a maximum of $2,000.
“The American people won, and Big Pharma lost,” said President Biden in September 2022, after the legislation passed. “It’s going to be a godsend to many families.”
Another crucial medical necessity, the shingles vaccine, which many seniors skip because of the cost, is now free. Shingles is a painful rash with blisters, that can be followed by chronic pain, and other complications, for which there is no cure
In 2022, more than 2 million seniors paid between $100 and $200 for that vaccine, but starting last year, Medicare prescription drug plans dropped the cost for shots down to zero.
Another victory for consumers over Big Pharma affects anyone of any age who struggles with diabetes. The cost of life-saving insulin was capped at $35 a month [for people on Medicare].
Medicare is also lowering the costs of the premium for Part B—which covers outpatient visits to your doctors. 15 million Americans will save an average of $800 per year on health insurance costs, according to the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Last year, for the first time in history, Medicare began using the leverage power of its large patient pool to negotiate fair prices for drugs. Medicare is no longer accepting whatever drug prices that pharmaceutical companies demand.
Negotiations began on ten of the most widely used and expensive drugs.
Among the ten drugs selected for Medicare drug price negotiation were Eliquis, used by 3.7 million Americans and Jardiance and Xarelto, each used by over a million people. The ten drugs account for the highest total spending in Medicare Part D prescription plans...
How are all these cost-savings being paid for?
The government is able to pay for these benefits by making sure the biggest corporations in America are paying their fair share of federal taxes.
In 2020, for instance, dozens of American companies on the Fortune 500 list who made $40 billion in profit paid zero in federal taxes.
Starting in 2023, U.S. corporations are required to pay a minimum corporate tax of 15 percent. The Inflation Reduction Act created the CAMT, which imposed the 15% minimum tax on the adjusted financial statement income of any corporation with average income that exceeds $1 billion.
For years, Americans have decried the rising costs of health care—but in the last three years, there are plenty of positive developments.
-via Good News Network, February 25, 2024
#united states#medicare#healthcare#healthcare access#big pharma#prescription drugs#health insurance#us politics#good news#hope#seniors#aging#healthy aging
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
In terms of being in a sales community, a former salesperson is not working in a sales department.
However, salespeople should remember that even if a prospect doesn`t buy a product from a salesman, or a saleswoman, a behaviour with a hospitality should remain.
All those who want to work as the salesman, or the saleswoman you are welcomed for a sales training here.
Speaking as a former salesperson who just experienced this from a current salesperson: If you can’t convince your potential client to buy your Thing™, even if you spent a lot of time and are on commission and they seemed like they were going to buy your Thing™, ending your sales pitch with some variation of, “Well I hope you enjoy (negative consequence of not buying my Thing™)” as a parting shot doesn’t win you any points. You’re actually convincing the person they made the right decision refusing, because nobody trusts a salesperson who is ungracious and rude when they don’t get their way.
#A salesman#A saleswoman#A salesperson#A sales manager#A sales team#Salespeople#A sales community#A sales department#A sales training#An online business#A legal business#An economy#A complaint#A consumer#Consumers#A law#A marketing company#Leads#Prospects#Buyers#sales training london#London#Dubai#Florida#An entrepreneur#Entrepreneurs#A corporation#Corporations#A verification
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
#Corporate Legal Department#Enterprise legal team#Legal Department#Technology Adoption#Technology Resilient#Technology Resilient Legal Department#legal#legal technology#legaltech#lawyers#law firm#enterprise technology
0 notes
Text
"A New Washington Influence Industry is Making Millions from Sanctions," Jeff Stein, Federica Cocco and Peter Whoriskey, The Washington Post, October 25, 2024:
Some sanctions lobbying isn’t about a company trying to avoid sanctions, but trying to get them imposed on competitors. In 2015, [Tom] Coleman, the ex-senator, registered with other former U.S. officials at his law firm to lobby on behalf of Intrepid Potash, a domestic fertilizer company. The firm’s lobbyists asked State Department officials to tighten sanctions against Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, a close ally of Russia who was accused of human rights abuses. Inside government, some officials thought the lobbyists for the Denver-based firm were less concerned about human rights than about business competition; their goal was clearly to cut Belarusian potash producers out of international markets, said three former administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private meetings. (The officials did not recall if Coleman was part of these conversations, although records show he was part of the lobbying team.) “You had these potash industry lobbyists trying to give us lessons on the intricacies of Belarusian politics,” said one former State Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private interactions. “It was very odd — and very thinly veiled.” After a years-long lobbying campaign and another crackdown by Lukashenko on civilian protesters, the U.S. sanctioned Belarusian potash firms in 2021, pushing global potash prices to a 13-year high. A State Department spokeswoman said the potash sanctions were imposed because the industry generates revenue for the Belarusian regime. Intrepid Potash paid Coleman and his colleagues $1.5 million between 2015 and 2019. Coleman’s law firm declined to comment... Other U.S. firms have pushed for sanctions against their competitors, too. In 2022, after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Alcoa Corporation, a major U.S. aluminum producer, pushed the White House to sanction Russian aluminum companies, while spending more than $1 million on a team of lobbyists, according to Senate disclosures. As economic hostilities have deepened with China, U.S. companies have significantly ramped up spending on lobbying aimed at pushing Chinese competitors out of Western markets. Over the past six years, U.S. entities — primarily companies — have spent more than $1 billion on contracts with lobbyists that mention “China” and “sanctions” as specific targets, although these contracts also often include other goals as well, according to The Post’s analysis of Justice Department records.
199 notes
·
View notes