#but still she deserved better ;~;

[strayslost]

OMG TERUKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I'M GONNA CRY!! I WILL CRY YOU GUYS!!

[muffinlance]

Edit: Yes, the original Sokka sexism arc is great and important. But we don't live in a world where the live action show runners decided to include it in the same form. So:

Unpopular opinion time: Sokka unlearning sexism isn't actually a large part of his character arc--it literally only takes the opening episodes. And removing it COULD be a sign that the live action is taking seriously the complaints I've seen from native fans about the original show runners deciding to make the Water Tribes that sort of sexist to begin with. Sokka's actual character arc is about gaining confidence and leadership skills, and they have the opportunity to focus on that MORE if they change the Kyoshi episode to focus on Suki as a fellow teenager forced into a leadership/protective role in her community and rocking it rather than using her as an object lesson on sexism for a male character to learn from. Whether they will ACTUALLY do that is on them, but it took me less than ten minutes to think up, so I sure hope someone in the writers' room actually cares about using the live action to expand on new angles of the characters. Big ask, I know.

Now the real question is: did they also remove Uncle Iroh's unwanted physical advances on a literally paralyzed Jun, and all of Zuko's snipes about girls? Because THOSE are the actually "iffy" sexism parts in AtLA, not Sokka's five minute arc.

[univemma]

I acknowledge that the season was cut almost in half so I should really cut them some slack but I WON'T, SO:

Plot holes/Forgotten Stuff in TUA:

(some of these are mostly just unanswered questions)

-Sloane?? Where tf did she go?

-Why was Jennifer (in the original timeline) in a cage? In Moldova?? Like, was she discovered to have something ( the dimaldo stuff whatever) inside of her, so they wanted to test on her? if she never came into contact with marigold before ben then why would they? WHAT

-also wait how the fuck did she get that stuff in her anyway? How did the dimaldo get to earth after it caused the end of Reginald's home planet? Like,,,shouldnt we know that?

-Her,,,in a squid??? she was Inside a giant squid? W h a t

-the S3 post credits of ben in the train. sure, whatever, that means nothing LMAOO

-I also can't get over - Five explaining "oh yeah when we do this EVERY ALTERNATE TIMELINE is gonna be destroyed, leaving only what should've been - the original," and lila fighitng to put her family in the train station,,,All the other timelines will be destroyed??They're dying and being reborn/reincarnated in the new one anyway GIRL WHAT ARE YOU DOING

(unless ive highly misunderstood that which is likely)

-this isnt a plot hole just - five "trying desperately over and over again to save his unhelpful family who he loves very very much" being literally turned into,,,that. did someone say character assassination?

-lila and five. thats a plot hole in and of itself I DONT CARE if he's aged 12 years from season 3, (6 yr timeskip at beginning of season, then 6 technically 7 in teh train), I DONT CARE IF HES 25 NOW, I DONT CARE IF HES MENTALLY 60 SOMETHING. Lila met and spent time with him when he looked like THIS

THATS A CHILD. and clearly, the family had SOME contact in the 6 yr skip, so she WATCHED HIM GROW UP from 13 - 19, like thats just so WEIRD WHAT

this was supposed to be plot holes and just turned into me being pissed im sorry but HOW DO YOU FUCK UP AN ENDING THIS BAD??

[natedevereaux]

never gonna stop losing my mind over this scene i fear

[technically-human]

Bro why is stone so 0v0

0 thoughts on this man's head

Who needs thoughts when you have affection

[bonicedemandarina]

live laugh love Betty Grof, truly nobody is doing it like her

Click for better quality, also maybe zoom in a lil bit for some cool details

Actually lemme make it easier for you, closeups under the cut

[neymiiie]

I just want to see him again.

[xxplastic-cubexx]

Evo wanda doodle from my cell at the christmas party

[keferon]

Hey, saw that you're having a bit of rough day. :(

I'm almost finished the next part.

But, would you like Prowl to bully "the wet bread moron" Josh? (as a treat. there's a part I could slide it in) Like a little petty revenge like get back at people being jerks to orcas?

-GLC

Oh I would absolutely love that yes🥺👉👈

[clouvu]

Offering lil doodles of them bc my eyes have been opened

[pant--eater]

the Vi x Gert truthers (BassBreaker, that's the ship name right?) won me over with this ship, Vi deserves a badass Zaunite rebel girl with chill energy who treats her right. In return Gert gets a super devoted protective girlfriend who enjoys her sick tunes and would punch god in the face for her 😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️

[sketchy-tour]

Found a lil bit of energy to doodle! Watched the new episode of TADC and now have grown VERY attached to Gangle she is definitely my favorite of the cast!

Take these very low effort and messy doodles I did of her after watching the new ep!

[femmeloverboy]

Vi deserves far better than Caitlyn. Sorry

[w45t3-m3]

I thought rereading my old childhood comic was funny until I got addicted

Now I’ve become like super obsessed with them n I want to create my own blog for them, yay.

Soooooo uhhhh I’ll prob make a separate post explaining this world a bit cus I’ve changed something’s around mainly concerning personalities (I’m doing cuphead n Felix justice) n relationships. Story wise it’s gonna follow the same beats just with a little bit more progression.

I also don’t know whether I want to start the comic from the beginning or continue where it last left off yk. Idk if anyone cares tho

[elation-station]

the town bisexuals are at your door it is time for you to pick a bride

[briius]

i have realised that a lot of people do not know what haunting the narrative actually means. first of all, every character that dies doesn't haunt the narrative (even if they are dearly missed). secondly, the meaning of haunting the narrative is: “a character whose present is sparse to none, but whose actions have major consequences to the story or the theme of the story”. i think the only characters who truly haunt the narrative are rhaegar, and lyanna somewhat.

rhaegar is the character we know the least about, his motivations, thoughts and who he is as a person. simultaneously he is a character that is very important for the past, present and future for a lot of characters. love vs duty is a very central part of asoiaf. a lot of people struggle with duty and how you are supposed to act, especially when it comes towards love. rhaegars entire story is about love vs duty, in the end he disregards duty because of love which will affect all characters. so rhaegar do affect one of the central themes in the story. rhaegar is the character that genuinely haunts the most characters throughout the series while he is simultaneously very important for how the narrative plays out and future characters' arc. it's not only that a lot of characters think about him, it is how they think of him. many characters have either this “what if feeling” about rhaegar, either if he would have lived or if certain situations regarding rhaegar would have been different. even rhaenys and aegon are connected to rhaegar rather than elia in how people interact and think about them.

“He remembered the angry words they had exchanged when Tywin Lannister had presented Robert with the corpses of Rhaegar's wife and children as a token of fealty. Ned had named that murder; Robert called it war. When he had protested that the young prince and princess were no more than babes, his new-made king had replied, "I see no babes. Only dragonspawn." 

AGOT Ned II rhaenys and aegon’s death is what we truly know of them. while both of them are still the children of elia, their death is connected with how robert felt about rhaegar and how cruel tywin's actions are. if the children would have been only elia’s they would have lived, but they were not. they are explicitly explained as rhaegar's children to justify the cruelty bestowed upon them. ned is afraid for cersei's children because of what happened to rhaegar's children, but in the end that is connected with other characters' feelings about rhaegar. cersei thinks about what would have happened if she married rhaegar and how different everything would have been. ned thinks about rhaegar's children and about robert's rage that still exists after all these years. robert obviously feels rage and anger towards rhaegar. robert also has the feelings as if he “lost” the war, because in the end he didn't win what he wanted and wished his own outcome would have been different regarding lyanna and him being king. how the story is structured is also by rhaegar's actions and his present, without him the rebellion would never have happened which is important for many characters and the theme. many of the adult characters are affected by the rebellion. catelyn for example thinks about how green renly is because he treats the coming war as a “song” compared to the rebellion. joncon’s actions with young griff are also because of his feelings towards rhaegar and the rebellion. he is literally haunted by his failures and rhaegar's death but also the loved he had for him. how rhaegar has affected daenerys and will affect jon is also important. daenerys reflects about rhaegar a lot, for the most part it’s about strength in herself. she gets compared to rhaegar and thinks of the cruelty that he died. she sees herself as rhaegar and the last dragon to hatch her own dragons, which is such a huge phenomenon which is influenced by rhaegar and the trident. i believe in r+l=j which means that rhaegar will be present in jon’s story. no matter what jon will have feelings on the matter, and they will most likely be conflicted. rhaegar’s actions will have a huge impact on jon’s identity. now characters that die do not haunt the narrative even if they still affect it. robb for example is remembered by his siblings and some of their decisions will be the result of him/his death. however, every character that has interacted a lot with each other will be affected by their death. that doesn’t mean that person is haunting the narrative. i don’t really see elia as haunting the narrative either. dorne is the only one that truly thinks of her and the cruelty that happened to her. by themselves dorne are not the narrative, especially because they were introduced so late in the story. i do like elia and think she is important for the characters' actions, but i just don’t see her as haunting the narrative because she didn't really shape it. as i explained earlier, her children and why things happened the way they did is because of rhaegar. but i do like elia so no hate towards her! i do believe lyanna haunts the narrative somewhat, not to the same extent as rhaegar. because a lot of people do think of her and she is important for the overall theme of the story. she is very important for ned’s characterisation and is very heavily in his thoughts. she is also important for jon’s future and his identity. but same as elia, she is most prominent with the starks rather than all characters.