#but its not for me

[took-my-breath-away]

what relationship from tg/tgm is ur roman empire and why? talk as much as u want i will GLADLY read an essay

SORRY OP YOU ASKED FOR AN ESSAY AND AN ESSAY YOU WILL RECIEVE ....

contrary to what's popular, it’s not icemav... not even close. (please don’t crucify me for this, i promise this is a genuine take and not hate toward the ship!) ice and mav’s dynamic is interesting and we cannot deny the gay subtext—ice is crucial to mav’s character growth, especially in tg86. but in terms of central relationships that drive the heart of the story and mav's character arc? it’s goose and mav, and later, roo and mav, that define both films on a deeper, more emotional level.

bear with me...

mav and goose set the foundation for everything in tg. their bond is the emotional core of the first film—goose is mav's conscience, his anchor. he’s not just a best friend; he’s family. this relationship is central to understanding why goose's death is such a devastating turning point for mav. it’s not just about losing a wingman; it’s about losing a brother, someone who believed in him AND forgave him unconditionally. this loss haunts mav throughout the rest of the movie and even more so in tgm. goose’s death becomes the source of all of mav’s guilt, hesitation, and self-doubt.

fast forward to tgm, and we see how this guilt spills over into his relationship with rooster. mav is torn between wanting to protect goose's son and letting him chart his own path. this tension forms the backbone of tgm's story. roo embodies all of mav's unresolved feelings about goose—the guilt, the sense of responsibility, and ultimately, the need for redemption. it’s this father/son dynamic, not a romantic or rivalry-based connection, that truly drives mav’s emotional arc in both films. the burden he feels for goose’s death is unresolved until he finds some semblance of reconciliation with rooster. the act of trusting rooster and allowing him to 'fly on his own' represents mav’s emotional catharsis atp

the weight of this connection makes it, in my view, the pillar of both films. mav’s growth is tied to his relationships with goose. ice certainly plays a key role in mav's journey—his respect for ice grows over time, and their friendship is a touching subplot—but it’s not the emotional center of the narrative. the top gun series is ultimately about legacy, guilt, and redemption, and in my hUMBLE opinion, those themes are carried by goose and rooster above all. mav’s motivation, his guilt, his need for absolution—all stem from these two relationships.

it’s goose and roo that are at the heart of it all and ILL DIE ON THIS HILL

(if, OP, you actually meant romantic relationship, then I AM SORRYVJAHAHAH (but it's still not icemav...kekeke))

[popfizzles]

You know of Bendy And The Ink Machine by any chance? People back then tend to put Cuphead and BATIM together a lot, what with their 1930's cartoon art styles, I always wondered what Bendy and his friends would look like if they were sort of DDWTD-ified...

I do know of BATIM! :)

I actually always really disliked the pairing of Cuphead and Bendy as two fandoms together/crossovers/etc.

I've said it before, but it bears repeating: Cuphead is a story that takes place within a cartoon world. BATIM is the story of an animation studio and the people who work there.

They're not the same AT ALL, and it never made sense to me to put them together. They're two completely different beasts.

[authorafterhours]

To the people who dislike it when Hannibal calls Will "William," I get it now.

[spacelesbiandisaster]

I was on AO3 and incidentally search the tag Barriss Offe/Luminara Unduli when I meant Barriss Offe & Luminara Unduli.

I wanted cute mom and daughter behavior and got a new trauma instead.

I will never forget to double check the tags again.

[sandalaris]

Man, every time I start to think Sheldon and Amy are cute on screen, the show goes and shows me why Amy would be happier finding someone more on her level. Sheldon too would be happier had he never gotten tangled up in feelings but at least it makes sense for his character to fight such things. I guess it make sense for Amy to cling in a relationship, as we see with Penny (and the shows utter cowardice in not making Amy -and Raj- bisexual is just a crime!), but a guy being a maybe-sorta-boyfriend is no reason to decide he's the best you can do and cling to him. I love Amy, but she needs wake up and realize that Sheldon's not gonna be what she wants or needs.

I suppose it's growth for Sheldon to admit he wants and needs people in his life. I just don't think they should've gone there with him and Amy. Leave them as just friends and let Amy explore her sexuality with other guys (and girls!) while Sheldon looks on and starts to wonder about his own capabilities in developing a pair bond. The show could then bring him attempting to date or leave him to his strongly aromantic coded self who wants companionship in the forms of strong friendships.

But yeah, the only couple I find I'm actually enjoying and seeing as a good decision is Howard/Bernadette.

[thecherrytarot]

will there be bts readings in your future, not a reading around them but about them ?? like taehyung persona vs personality kinda

heyy!! Not sure. I don't feel comfortable doing readings about them sorry :( but you can this one and im pretty sure there are many other readers who have done similar readings for all the members

[paintedcrows]

They do this every year...

Happy 25th to Dipdop and Lebam!! and Happy 17th to Hatsune Miku!! 🎉🎉

(comic continued: The M&M stands for...)

[chiisana-lion]

[puppyeared]

filipina miku!! my mom helped me with her outfit ^_^

[codecicle]

Guys I'm so glad everyone loves hit JRWI campaign: The Suckening so much. 12 thousand notes on just a thumbnail that's so cool. Anyone think about emizel pussy-out post revival

[tunakitchen]

35K QBAGINA‼️‼️‼️🔥🔥💯💯💥 MINECRAFT YURI 🔛🔝

clip from @pixiecaps

[everythingwasnormalhere]

pls rb if you think cuddling doesn't have to be s3xual

im tryna prove a point to my bf's mother help me out

[azvhaalk]

glorious evolution

[aropride]

interaction i have with shocking regularity is when someone’s complaining abt someone they know and theyre like “ughh they’re 21 and dont have a job and refuse to learn to drive” and then they remember who they’re talking to (me. 21 cant work cant drive) and go like

[canonkiller]

I just think everyone should take a moment to consider the question "what is your visual shorthand for cruelty?" and then follow it up with a critical "and who taught you that?"

specific examples include but are not limited to

why is an evil timeline character design disabled? (why do the heroes go through equally punishing battles and never lose an arm, a leg, an eye?)

why are the futuristic scifi terrorists uniformly darker skinned? (why are the heroes so much lighter?)

why is the greedy boss fat? (why are the heroes skinny?)

why is the criminal mastermind heavily scarred? (why is the brooding, traumatized hero unscathed?)

why is the predatory creep a bearded person in a dress and makeup? (why are none of the heroes trans women?)

who taught you that this is how things are?

how long do you plan on repeating it?