#anyway this is basically my manifesto for my whole ‘saw gender thing’ thing

[fredbydawn]

I am once again putting in too much effort

[weebsinstash]

I saw your tags on that reblog about voting and, I keep seeing people bring up Project 2025 like it's some horrible thing but doesn't it already say a lot of stuff "those types" of people have already been saying anyways. I don't really understand what makes Project 2025 so different than what they're already doing ykwim

I highly highly recommend watching the LegalEagle video on Project 2025 because while they are discussing Project 2025 they even pull up screenshots of the exact pages with the exact wording that the document contains. I can mention a few things here but I really cannot emphasize enough that this document is over 900+ pages long and covers so many different topics where if I were to discuss everything i see wrong with it and what upsets me this post could easily reach several thousand words

Here is my biggest takeaway: many of the ideas and propositions Project 2025 suggests are either things that are based completely upon faith, morals, and/or opinions, OR, are things that are inherently proven to already be ineffective or even outright dangerous. Project 2025 is an explicitly Christofascist manifesto where they claim that the biggest problems in our country are having too many unmarried mothers, queer people, immigrants, and rejection of the Church (not rejection of religion as a whole, they explicitly use "the church" referring to either christianity or catholicism specifically multiple times throughout the manifesto) and seeks to rectify what it sees as problems with extremely damaging and dramatic actions that are, by definition, fascism, heavily restricting your human rights and even creating targeted government agencies to surveil the American public

>project 2025 explicitly says that fatherlessness is a "principal cause of poverty, crime, rejection of the Church, and high school dropouts" and they seek to rectify this through abolishing no fault divorce and completely getting rid of food stamps and other public welfare programs. How can you be an unmarried mother if you literally cannot access the programs intended to help you feed your child, after all?

>it blatantly preaches that keeping the (exclusively heterosexual) family unit together will solve most of America's problems and they take this to delusional degrees.

>they want to get rid of plan b, birth control, and even CONDOMS and instead insist that women use the rhythm method and track their ovulation cycles which is already known to be extremely ineffective and has been for most of human history

>they want to get rid of Planned Parenthood despite the fact they provide many many health services outside of abortion and even go far as to claim that we wouldn't need STI treatment and prevention once everyone is in monogamous faithful marriages.

> This also pretty explicitly means that if you're not married and want to have sex that they want to leave you without any way to prevent yourself from becoming pregnant and if you do become pregnant, you won't be allowed to seek an abortion and you won't be allowed to raise your own child unless you have a good income. They either want you to straight up fucking die or put your baby up for adoption (but don't worry it's not like Republicans are well known for defunding foster care and there are red states where teachers have explicit legal permission to use corporal punishment on children or anything...)

>they want to completely remove specific words and verbiage from government laws, regulations, and documents, in an extremely blatant attempt to censor the truth and scientific fact to intentionally keep the average American ignorant and uninformed. They want to completely remove language about gender, race, climate change, abortion, and other extremely basic words and topics. They quite literally do not even want you or in this case the government to even MENTION these issues as being real and important because if you don't know about it, you cannot educate yourself and possibly rise up

>did you know Fox News basically never even talks about Project 2025 because they don't want their viewers to even know what it is. The GOP model is to literally keep everyone as stupid as possible to trick them into submission

>speaking of, they want to completely abolish the department of education and this is explicitly because they want to control the flow of information and basically create a massive propaganda infrastructure where only their specific ideology and opinions are taught.

>it explicitly mentions a plan to mass deport immigrants, at least 20 million. I don't think any of us can even properly understand how extremely damaging that is to our country. Every single country on earth relies on immigrants to help keep their economies and job markets afloat and this is a policy explicitly rooted in hatred over fact. It is explicitly racist and is not based in any logic or reasoning besides "we don't want brown people in our country"

>Jesus Christ they hate queer people so much. So so so much. They literally refer to the modern movement or giving queer people and POC more rights and recognition "as the totalitarian cult movement known as The Great Awokening". THESE PEOPLE HAVE HELD POSITIONS IN GOVERMENT AND THIS IS HOW THEY'RE SPEAKING IN THEIR OWN OFFICIAL MANIFESTO. They are childish, delusional, and INSANE

>they want to completely remove uh, laws and regulations preventing you from being discriminated against and fired and being the victim of hate crimes, by the way. They want to be able to fire you if they find out you're queer. They want to physically harm you without repercussions if you are queer. They want you to not even be visible in public if you are queer. If you are a queer child they want your teachers to out you to your parents. If you are queer, they want you dead.

>not related to project 2025 but also related to this topic: did you know the man Trump elected as his Secretary of the Department of Labor, Acosta, was once a forner Epstein defense attorney. Trump was literally directly tied to Epstein and put a fucking Epstein lawyer in high level government. Members who have worked in Trump's administration have worked on this document. These people have already served and have had careers in government and they're THIS fucking nuts and ideologically poisoned

I just. I could literally keep going but it's quite literally just openly fascist behavior. "We don't like when people do this so we're going to make this illegal. We don't like Those People using welfare so we will completely get rid of welfare so no one can use it. We don't like people who don't go to our church so we will force our religious beliefs upon them and make them live by our rules regardless. We KNOW immigrants harvest most of our food and do significant portions of our less desirable manual labor jobs but, they're brown and they vote Democrat and we don't like people who arent straight white religious heterosexual conservatives so we will get rid of them despite the fact it would negatively impact our economy"

I just really cannot emphasize enough how much is riding on this election for not just our country but GLOBAL consequences. America has already been damaged so heavily by this conservative Suprene Court and the more we let these actual cultists take power, the harder they right to make themselves seem reasonable and the right choice and brainwash their already extremely easy to fool supporters, who then are now doing things like, setting ballot boxes on fire and attacking poll workers, all because their God king is still saying his election was stolen despite every single government agency and even governments who align with him saying it didn't happen

I know who I'm voting for in November. Do you? And before anyone wants to say "both sides are the same" you're clearly missing that neutrality explicitly benefits the side that is the most aggressive. Abstaining to vote or voting third party is a vote for Trump and Project 2025. If you are not attempting to stop them, you are assisting them. Buckle in everyone, because it's gonna get real messy over the next few months

[vivalabisexualrevolution]

Alright folks, we’re about to get some real fuckin ignorance up in here, so buckle the fuck up and get ready for some biphobic bullshit.

So, a bit of backstory: today i was scrolling through the bisexual tag on instagram (as one does) when i saw THIS monstrosity of a post:

now i’ve probably (hopefully) piqued your curiousity, and you may be wondering “what’s wrong with this post?”

WELL, let’s just get into it. i mean, how bad can it be?

and buddy, if you’ve never seen this post before, you have no idea.

(I feel like it’s worth noting i’m not including all slides of this post for sake of keeping this as short as possible)

first off we see this misconstrued excuse for a “definition” of bisexuality, with historically false statements meant to discount the modern definition of bisexuality.

yes, really. the person biphobe who wrote this literally just blatantly erased HISTORICAL FACTS to suit their ideology. they’re willingly spreading misinformation to promote microlabels under the guise that they’re just trying to “educate” people. (basically, theyre just attempting to recruit pansexuals by hoping bisexuals who are new to the community will buy into this shit.) either that, or they’re just an ignorant idiot who refuses to actually attempt to educate themselves on bisexuality. either way, gross.

it’s all in the quote “however, it hasn’t always been this way” when it literally actually always has “been this way.”

to prove my point, take this quote (forgive me for citing a wikipedia article, it was the quickest place i could copy paste this information without having to go down a google wormhole to find a “better” source) stating the early history of the label bisexual: the man who coined it and what his definition was.

“The word "bisexual" was first coined in 1892 by Richard von Kraft-Ebing in the 7th edition of his book Psychopathia Sexualis in order to describe someone who engaged in sexual activity with both same-sex and different-sex partners.”

yes, that’s right. there is absolutely NO distinction of “two genders” even in this old ass definition from 1892. the prefix of bisexual has always referred to the two sexes, not the two genders.

and this historical inaccuracy is seen AGAIN when you take the 1990 bisexual manifesto into account!

So that’s where the first mistake in this twitter post is even though the whole damn post is just a big fat mistake.

here’s another another slide basically showcasing the same biphobic misconceptions: “bi means two” and “the inclusivity of bisexuality is recent”

but in this screenshot we see something else interesting: the argument that a biphobe’s comfort is more important than the comfort of bisexuals in the community who don’t want to be erased.

from the quote “not everyone feels comfortable labeling themselves this way” one can reasonably deduce that the reason that these people don’t feel “comfortable” identifying as bisexual (spoiler alert: its internalized biphobia) is because of the biphobic misconceptions being SPREAD by the label pansexual. basically, it’s a paradox all stemming from one thing: biphobes.

i mean, think about it. for what other reason would someone feel that the label bisexual is SO detestable that they feel the need to identify as something else that’s essentially the same thing? it’s due to the fact that these people want to distance themselves from biphobic misconceptions by further pushing them, which i find to be incredibly selfish and cowardly.

NOW, this whole post is basically OP repeating the same biphobic misconceptions and ideologies over and over and over again, but since they said “pansexuality is often used as a more specific way of defining attraction” i’d like to pose this argument: microlabeling attraction promotes erasure and is overall a very unhealthy thing, especially when you’re exposing it to young questioning teens and preteens trying to figure out their sexuality! coming from someone who has stressed themselves out over microlabels before, it’s not okay or healthy to promote the idea that a minuscule difference in preference = a whole new label! plus, it’s just illogical.

anyways, this post is already really long, so i’ll just end it on this, which at this point, should already be a given, but i’ll just say it anyways: to say that bisexuality and pansexuality have “overlaps” is to blatantly ignore the fluidity of bisexuality and erase certain aspects of bisexual people’s labels. they do not “overlap”, they are not “similar”, they are the same. point blank.

so in conclusion:

identifying as pansexual: disgusting!

blatantly erasing history to fit your ideologies: gross!

speaking over bisexual people for the sake of “acceptance” and “inter community peace” and blatantly ignoring biphobia out of ignorance: nasty!

if you support the label pansexual, you are not our ally! you cannot simultaneously support both bisexuals and pansexuals! if you support pansexuality, guess what? you’re a biphobe apologist!