#and mad at the elongated muskrat

[sestrahulk]

300 FOLLOWERS

Thank you all for following me! I will probably be more active on here again, since twitter is such a mess right now. Love you all. <3

[gastlygallows]

Making fun of Elon and celebrating Luigi are two things tumblr and 4chan are united on

I'm feeling a 4chumblr rekindled romance in 2025 mark your Bingo cards

[whatareyoureallyafraidof]

Fuck Elon Musk!

[nando161mando]

All this to divert us from the main issue

[multifandommadness1300]

I see no difference

[redneckkangaroo]

Ok but when are we going to start mass uploading gay Trump x Elon smut

[61below]

Elon Musk is store brand Mads Mikkelsen

[nightmaree-eyess]

I reached my Twitter limit in under 2 minutes…bruh imma lose my moots cause I haven’t had this account for more than a month. Gotta be thoughtful about what I tweet and shit.

[ll-again]

This attitude of "my preference is the objectively correct option" is a perfect encapsulation as to why all techbros deserve to be stripped naked, covered in honey, strapped into the stocks, and left for the bears to sort out.

Other people will have different opinions from you, Elon. That is both normal and allowed, Elon.

Humanity is a rich tapestry, and THAT IS A GOOD THING. ELON.

Where is your respect for free speech now, Elon?

The bears are coming, Elon.

HAHA LETS REMOVE LIGHT MODE BC DARK MODE IS BETTER OOOOH LIGHT MODE BURNS MY EYES HAHA LOOK IM SO RELATABLE LOL ROFL LMAO

i need some of you motherfuckers to understand that many of us use light mode not bc we like it more, but bc we suffer from visual conditions that make dark mode actually more eye straining than light mode to the point some ppl might find dark mode straight up unreadable, removing it is not some quirky funny little thing, its literally removing accessibility options

[forkaround]

I don't care about their Rich People Problems - A Rant

So, I was doing my weekly audit and I realized why I didn't like 2023 BLs.

I love Perth but I can't stand Kanghan. His problem is his dad is too nice. HIS DAD IS TOO NICE. He has money, his dad doesn't expect things from him. Like seriously. That's his problem.

Also the Only Friends characters. Their problems are seriously HAVING money and time. Money can't buy happiness type story. *deep breaths*

And Tantai from Laws of Attraction. They want to paint him as abused, but we know for the most part his dad only ignored him. There wasn't that much physical harm. And he has all this money that he can do anything with. Hell his dad even offers to send him to the US. They have money. And still Tantai doesn't have a job. He only has to pick a place and his name will get him a decent job but no, he is doing god knows what.

And the shows point it out over and over again. Like make up your mind, you want me to like them or not?

I can't stand any of these characters especially when they are paired with a poor boy.

Sailom has to carry the emotional and rational burden of the relationship while Kang acts out. Kang won't suffer any consequences what so ever but Sailom will and yet...

And don't get me started on Tantai and Thee. He has an evil father. He knows what his father is capable off and yet, Thee is taking the brunt of the fall, the blame, the beating, everything.

Same with Sand. He keeps saving Ray at his own expense. Not just emotional but physical, financial and social. And Ray gets mad at him??? Like boy take a look in the mirror.

Even a little bit with Bai Zongyi and Zerui's relationship.

I can't... I just can't with these characters.

I'm like read the room. It's 2023. Rich people are enemy No. 1 all over the world. Especially rich assholes with no self awareness and you make them into the romantic leads. Like 10 years ago I could have suspended my disbelief. In 2023, I can't. I can believe the 'everyone is gay' universe. I can believe all BL shenanigans. I can even believe people would choose to kiss other people with vomit still on their lips. But I can't suspend my disbelief and say they aren't Elongated Muskrat baby edition.

It's simply because the writers didn't know how to come up with a life struggle for these characters and that's why you have 'having money is a problem' problem. Like grow up.

You want power dynamics? There are other ways.

You want poor little rich character? There are other ways.

BLs have done it before. BLs have had decently written poor little rich characters. But this isn't it.

I still remember what Mark's mom said last year in Love Mechanics: (To paraphrase) 'Money can buy happiness but it's not as expensive as we think.' That is such a powerful, honest, realistic and rational statement.

Forget vampire BLs I want Eat the Rich BLs.

[some1probably]

In the interest of... uh... coping i think, i've decided to cast the 2024 US Presidential election as muppets.

Candidates:

Swedish Chef as Joe Biden- One of the common criticisms (and memes) of Biden on from both sides of the aisle is his indiscernible mumbling, and the fact that he wasn't entirely coherent even when his words could be made out. The muppet whose dialogue is entirely gibberish thus makes sense.

Janice as Kamala Harris- One of like 2 notable female muppets (and i have plans for Miss Piggy), plus her large mouth seems appropriate given that Harris's laugh was the only thing Republicans could find to make fun of her for.

Miss Piggy as Donald Trump- Hear me out here. Similar build, iconic blonde hair, both present very macho. Piggy has also shown enjoyment playing both villains and royalty, Trump being a villain and trying to become a king. Finally, it would make some people very mad, and that sounds great.

Running Mates:

Dr. Bunsen Honeydew as Tim Walz- Idk, it vibes to me.

Sam Eagle as J.D. Vance- Given how patriotic, or rather nationalistic, the Republicans can be, Sam's "The American Way" schtick fits well. Sam isn't eccentric enough to be anyone else in this race.

Others:

Kermit the Frog as Elongated Muskrat- Mostly for the jokes about Musk being Trump's first man, or vice versa. Kermit also rarely gets to play a villain, and when he does its usually kinda lame, but i think he's got potential. Briefly considered Honeydew or Beaker, but they're both much to cute for Musk.

Barack Obama as Barack Obama- The one human character each muppet movie needs

Statler and Waldorf as the debate moderators- I want them to moderate a real debate. It would be so funny. The best possible version of all of those debate parodies. They could also be news pundits or something, but they need to do this.

Mr. Wilkins as The Assassin- putting this here might be in poor taste, but i feel like everything political has been in poor taste for years at this point, so screw it, its funny. Still not basing it on the actual individual, that seems a step to far.

That's all i got so far.

[sponsored-deactivated20210106]

Third rate dictatorships that censor the Internet of course shut down Wikipedia to control their people's access to information.

I just donated.

[canvaswolfdoll]

in this time of ill advised deregulation, airline accidents, and the elongated muskrat stepping where he doesn't belong, it might be funny to all start using amtrak and revitalize train travel while no one's watching.

1. safe air travel is being threatened (recent accident in dc and there's a bill being floated to get rid of tsa which, i know, safety theater, but no prevention is probably not the best idea)

2. musk sabotaged california's plan for high speed rail, which i take personally, so using his antics to distract as we put money into amtrak is karma

3. longer travel times is less work time and less profits for airlines and gas companies, and if we can make a big enough loss of profits, we can get corporations big mad at the current administration

plus, again, train travel is just neat! (and maybe will drive operation costs down enough to approach affordability)

[gynoidgearhead]

"$2 trillion dollars" fuck off. that's not a real number (a frustrated shitpost)

You can't put two trillion dollars' worth of goods into a room.

You can barely even put two billion dollars' worth of goods into a room.

It is an actual exploit of our economic system that you can turn real goods into tokens that allow you to cram more ""value"" into a room than its referents would naturally allow.

No, fuck off. If you try to stack more than a million dollars, it should refuse like it's Minecraft or something. A million dollars plus one should still be a miilion dollars for rules purposes. A million dollars plus a further million dollars should still equal one million dollars.

At some point we have to admit that the numbers themselves are violent - that the nature of our economic system allows for distortions that are obscene and inhumane.

A human being should not be able to have ""a billion dollars"". If Elongated Muskrat or Jeffrey Bezos tried to cram a billion dollars worth of real value into a treasure chest, do you think he could even close the lid, let alone meaningfully "own" the contents of that treasure chest? No, and furthermore, fuck off!

Here is my rage-inspired proposal for a rules patch. If you put more than a million dollars into a pile, the value of the pile is instantly reduced to zero and the paper (or the digital medium holding the sum) spontaneously combusts. Numbers over a million dollars are just Metaphysically Banned. This affects larger sums first and is fairly broad as to what constitutes a pile.

"But that'd break the economy!" For all human purposes, our economy is already broken. Capitalism is the existential-risk paperclip maximizer AI that is already here, taking over everything.

The planet is dying for the sake of Number Go Up. In my desperation, is it really so unreasonable that part of me wishes the numbers themselves could break down, could rebel against this additive and multiplicatory madness?

[cosmicsponge2004]

Yo, The Internet be mad buggin'

[remzarci]

...If I hear, in a Destial meme, that Elongated Muskrat, in a Peyote induced madness, died because he tried to climb the X on his building...

I am not gonna be surprised