#aight i'm done

[sapphire-sans]

They turned graceful, sarcastic Toothless into a fucking slobbering muscular dog with giant eyes, removing the last drops of intelligence and elegance from him (probably because males can't be elegant, right???). And they literally turned Light Fury into a tampon with glitter, a dragon Barbie, etc. The whole point of her design is not in the "sea theme". NO. It's the fact that she is so smooth and feminine stupidly because Toothless needs an ideal female, so that even a one-year-old child can understand that she is a WOMAN.

I KNOW RIGHT????

My least favorite scene in the trailer was when Toothless woke up from when Hiccup knocked him out of the sky. HIS EYES OMG. His eyes were SIDE-EYEING Hiccup in the animated version, saying "Don't you dare fucking kill me." But in the live-action version, his eyes were saying "Please kill me. Just do it."

And in some parts of the trailer, he looks scaly, like a lizard, but in other parts he's SMOOTH??? AND WHY DOES HICCUP LOOK LIKE A MAN.

[graveyarrdshift]

[satyrbitez]

fuck it i'll post the alternate version that i liked too

*crawls out of a swamp looking dead as hell* hey

extra stuff under the cut

*jumps back into swamp* bye

[tiny-evillious]

The full canvas!

Calling this "the electric kettle fucking broke so i got so mad i drew 20 characters while waiting for us to get a new kettle, until then we're boiling water in a pot" but since i'm queueing these the kettle should be here a week ago from posting this (update the new kettle is good. i can make tea 2-4 times a day now again!!!!!). In other news I'm posting these on twitter now too! tiny_evillious on twitter. cheers!

[semi-sketchy]

Probably poking the bear by making another IDW Sonic post, but my timeline has been filled with this panel all day and I have something to say.

I think people complaining about Lanolin getting hate are missing the point.

Like, this is what she did to defend someone who was ultimately guilty of what they were accused of.

The readers have context, they know she’s in the wrong, I don’t understand how you could spin this behavior into being likable.

No, just because “this revelation devastated her” doesn’t excuse how her actions hurt others. This isn't about her. This isn't about her feelings. Everything isn't just A-OK because she "feels bad" or whatever, this is about the feelings of her victims.

If they made a commentary on this like Bojack Horseman does, I’d probably like it, but it has been played completely straight for over a year now. While we don't know how this plays out yet, this comic has proven it isn't something smarter.

If I had to take a guess as to how this will pan out, probably something along the lines of Lanolin making a short apology that's moreso "I don't deserve to be team leader" where everyone tells her it's fine and has to build her back up rather than hold her accountable for the damage she did. That's what I expect out of this comic. Writers prove me wrong challenge.

[umber-cinders]

Winston Duke doing all kinds of right 😭💕💞

IG Post

[caluupin]

a doodle that I did a bit ago

[cringelordofchaos]

I love characters that are traumatized from having to see their parents arguing with each other so much to the point of emotionally neglecting their child ❤️ (except in Zander and will's case their parents are divorced and are both away from their abusive fathers but that's beside the point)

characters n where they're from under the cut

Sean (from the music freaks)(<3333333)

kenny (from South Park)

will (from stranger things)

zander (also from the music freaks)

gayass Gacha life smirk jumpscare

[conarcoin]

might i suggest opening a book perhaps? reading a reaearch paper? a bit too hard for someone who's still ranting about a twitch streamer disliking them after the dude's already moved on though, i would assume

mad

[sunlitlemonade]

how to know which minyard you're talking to? hold a cigarette out to him. one might just take it. the other will regard you with contempt and disdain. hope that helps.

[candlelightkitty555]

"trans people are all perverts" factoid actually just statistical error. average trans person is normal. trans nsfw tumblr accounts, who all post multiple times a day about sucking the soul out of girlcock and boycunt, are outliers and should not have been counted.

[rin-hanarin]

"Gale Dekarios likes you too. Very, very much." 🥺💜

[pinkydude]

🦝 Valentin Da Silva | Through 2022 ⚡

Using this Male V Monday to reflect back on my lil stinky 😌

Did a similar post last year, it's always cool to see how much he changed as an OC, what I explored and how I improved in the VP game too 😳👉👈 Picked some of my favs from each months

[darabeatha]

/ the changes have been made ✨💙💜🖤

[amazingbananabread]

Ngl, i saw some errors on Giroro and Tamama so i fix them, but..it got some noticeble changes if i'm gonna be honest.

Also, have this too.

[keelanrosa]

terfs when a study shows literally anything positive about trans people/transitioning: 'hm i think this requires some fact-checking. Were those researchers REALLY unbiased? Because if they were biased this doesn't count and if they weren't knowingly biased they probably were unconsciously biased, woke media affects so much these days. Have there been any other studies on this? Because if there haven't been this could be an outlier and if there have been and they all agree that's a bit odd, why aren't there any outliers, and if there have been and any disagree we really won't know the truth until we very thoroughly analyze them all, will we? Were there enough subjects for a good sample size? Did every single subject involved stay involved through the whole study because if they didn't we should be sure nothing shady was going on resulting in people dropping out. Are we 110% sure all the subjects were fully honest and at no point were embarrassed or afraid to admit they didn't love transitioning to the people in charge of their transition? Are we 110% sure none of the subjects were manipulated into thinking they were happy with their transition? In fact we should double-check what they think with their parents, because if the subjects and their parents disagree it's probably because they've been manipulated but their cis parents have not and are very unbiased. How many autistic subjects were there because if there weren't enough then this doesn't really study the overlap between autistic and trans and if there were too many then we just don't know enough about what causes that overlap to be sure this study really explains being trans and isn't just about being autistic. How many AFAB subjects were there because if there weren't enough this is just another example of prioritizing AMAB people and ignoring the different struggles of girls and women and if there were too many how do we know sexism didn't affect the results. Was the study double-blinded? We all know double-blinded is the most reliable so if this one wasn't that's a point against it even if the thesis literally physically could not be double-blinded. Look i'm not being transphobic, i want what's best for trans people! Really! But as a person who is not trans and therefore objective in a way they cannot possibly be, i just think we should only take into account Good Science here. You want to be following science and not being manipulated or experimented upon by something unscientific, right?'

terfs when they see a study of 45 subjects so old it predates modern criteria for gender dysphoria and basically uses 'idk her parents think she's too butch', run by a guy who practiced conversion therapy, 'confirmed' by a guy who treated the significant portion of subjects who didn't follow up as all desisting, definitely in the category of 'physically cannot double-blind this', completely contradicted by multiple other studies done on actual transgender subjects, but can be kinda cited as evidence against transitioning if you ignore everything else about it: 'oOOH SEE THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TALKIN BOUT. SCIENCE. Just good ol' unbiased thorough analysis. I see absolutely no reason to dig any deeper on this and if you think it's wrong you're the one being unscientific. It's really a shame you've been so thoroughly brainwashed by the trans agenda and can't even accept science when you see it. Maybe now that someone has finally uncovered this long-lost study from 1985, we can make some actual progress on the whole trans problem.'