#ai generated most probably
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
5leggedlamb · 1 year ago
Text
what the hell did I just stumble upon
what curse have you brought upon this land
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
ai-the-broccoli · 8 months ago
Text
honestly it's funny how Light is in-universe conventionally attractive in a way that loops back to being an acquired taste in fandom (in comparison to L, that is)
23 notes · View notes
hide-your-bugs-away · 2 months ago
Text
Music-related content mill YouTube channels making uncanny AI videos about the Animals' history is almost funny to me for how ridiculous they are but then I remember that the emphasized details of said history (usually regarding Alan and Eric's relationship) are going to be the over-exaggerated parts that have been regurgitated uncritically since the 90s for the most shock value and drama and will just poison the well for their impressionable audience of boomers and "did you know the bassist of the Animals managed Jimi Hendrix?" fun-fact sharers, yet again pushing the blame and scapegoat status onto Alan and sullying interpretations of their relationship (and the band's general dynamic) further.
...Bring it on. Those shitty channels may work hard to spread misinformation, but my overly affectionate art and earnest infodumping about a band and a musical duo only like eight people care about works harder. 😎
Tumblr media
#honestly the funniest part of all of this is that the people in charge of these content mill channels think animals history is interesting#and like yes it is but not in a 'THEY WERE AT ONE ANOTHER'S THROATS AND HATED EACH OTHER FROM DAY ONE!!!!!'#more in a 'they banded together and endured a great deal of manipulation from their superiors and found comradery despite differences.' way#with the relationship between their original keyboardist and vocalist actively demonstrating that throughout the decade#i just hate how all discussions of the animals boil down to 'alan ripped them off' and 'chas managed jimi hendrix' and 'eric hates alan'#like yes my own conversations about the animals are overly centralized around eric and alan too yes i know i'm autistic 😔😔😔#but purposefully the more positive aspects and i love exploring the band's greater dynamic with each other and their managerial staff#people making alan the scapegoat time and time again when JEFFERY IS. RIGHT THERE. jimi hendrix fans know this!!!!!!#i scrolled through like twenty of this account's videos and only one mentioned any 'managers' and never any names#HIS NAME IS FRANK MICHAEL JEFFERY. PLEASE.#MICHAEL PETER HAYES ISN'T INNOCENT EITHER but we hear mickie most out in this house 😔#don arden was apart of some of that shuffling too i'm sure#anyway aghghghhghh it never stops i always have to fight back against the haters with my price-burdon truth 😔#not that i mind because i looooove talking about them and the animals in general but.... there's always a new force i have to fight against#AND NOW ROBOTS ARE MAKING IT. NOT JUST ILL-INFORMED JOURNALISTS AND FACEBOOK COMMENTS.#can't wait until i have time to make little animal doodles again because the comradery (and price-burdon affection) will be STRONG SO STRON#as always i have a 37000 word essay about alan price and eric burdon's relationship that i am able to deploy at any moment#i really really REALLY LOVE THEM. NO MATTER HOW FRACTURED THE BAND AND THEIR HISTORY IS I LOVE THEM. THEY WENT THROUGH SOOO MUCH TOGETHER.#and alan and eric really did like each other a lot fun fact eeeeee okay dr pepper time#so many of these ai videos are about their ed sullivan performances specifically lmaooo#probably because it's the only decent footage of them in circulation 😔 thanks ed sullivan for capturing the hilton smiles#things i said today#eric is pissed ME TOO#animusings
6 notes · View notes
superconductivebean · 12 days ago
Text
#1653
reddit brought it to my attention that there are entire subreddits for spotting ai and determining if the image is real or not
among useful advices for checking for the consistency of the noise across the rgb channels (shouldn't be even) and fake compressions i commonly see some brain tumours
you see, to tell ai in text you need to have some exposure to human text because ai text is an approximation of everything in the human one. the 'law' of three, the adjectives, the business english; once you are able to see it, you'll pretty reliable spot it in text that isn't meant to be a carte de visite
to tell ai in an image you require to have a lot of exposure to the all things possible to see in reality on the daily basis aka you are prolly suck at it if all you see is a sad suburbia area. aka yes, these subs are filled with people who call something irrelevant a dead give away of ai because god forbid laces be messy or composition have mistakes in lieu of noticing the eyes are off, the skin is wax, the shapes come apart, and that the overall composition does not make any sense at all and tells you nothing about the character or the landscape
2 notes · View notes
plantyaoi · 5 months ago
Text
man. i really don’t care about robots.
#like in any media ever#idc if in detroit become human the robots can feel. bc tbh im like ‘no they can’t they’re robots’#like i just don’t think any piece of technology will ever gain sentience ever. so i dont care. throw that fucker away.#does this make sense???#i can’t think of anything less sexy than the cold hard embrace of a machine that operates from the will of doing what it thinks it wants to#i just don’t care for it but props to ppl who do. i can’t.#i think in general inorganicconcepts in the context of human intimate relationships is just so fundamentally unappealing to me#like idk. it’s probably just me.#i think it’s also the idea (in robot/human pairings) that it can never be /real/ in the ways that matters#or that most of the times robots are a substitute for grief over someone lost#or that they’re uncanny imposters#interesting ideas for sure but i can never really be into them as characters onto their own#like i dont care about their identity to me they’re identitiless chameleons who are by design always trying to replicate something else.#something or someone they were made for#they don’t have autonomy they will never have true autonomy because something in them is designed to alter them to a desired state#i also think with like current affairs with ai and whatnot it just sours the idea even more#part of it is also I dont think robots/the Machine’s (capital M) issues will ever feel tangible to me#a lot of robots in media have their struggles focused on identity and autonomy and i alr dismiss the notion that robots can ever gain#enough awareness to feel#so what does that leave me to care about?#plus i find most robot designs really lame…#sorry if u like robots btw i just needed somewhere to put my thoughts 🥹 if u do good for u#personal.txt#i’ll see if this opinion holds up with m/etal sonic lol#i know he’s a fan favourite
3 notes · View notes
the-travelling-bitch · 2 years ago
Note
AHH AH HHH AH AH AH HHH THAT SCARA >>>
TEASING SCARA >>>>
OHHH IM SO GLAD MY EYES SAW THAT ITS ALL I EVER NEEDED *opens ai*
well i’m glad you like it and without meaning to offend or accuse… i feel like i have to say it: please don’t copy my works into an ai
while i’m not saying you are doing that, i know that there are readers who do; i’m already not a big fan of ais (stealing from artists and writers just isn’t my vibe) but i also know that they’ve taken such roots in fandoms that people won’t just stop using them
but i can tell people not to use my works, the ones i put time and effort into; i don’t feel like feeding the ai with the skills i cultivated
2 notes · View notes
eighth-heroine · 4 months ago
Text
no for real. i want a way to block ai from appearing on my internet and also to block amazon shopping results from coming up when i search for literally anything instead of showing me a store where i can buy it irl. then i will be happy.
I wish there was a way to completely OPT OUT of AI. Like you could set your ENTIRE Internet browser to NOT shove it down your throat.
When social media was getting big, you could just NOT get a Facebook or a Twitter. It was simple as that. You can't do that with AI.
Trying to find a job? It goes straight to an AI filter. Trying to look at art? Here's 100+ ai shit. Trying to look up who was in what movie from the 1980s? GOOGLE GEMINI IS HERE WITH THE COMPLETELY WRONG ANSWER!
Someone PLEASE create a way to allow people to get AI the FUCK OUT of our lives if we DO NOT WANT IT!
61K notes · View notes
starlightseraph · 1 month ago
Text
holy fuck my biggest pet peeve atm is those advertisements that have popped up over the past few months that are made in the style of short-form videos or podcast clips.
they piss me off more than those skinwalker-ass ai generated fitness courses, which is saying something.
0 notes
moch-ila · 2 months ago
Text
maybe I should start editing beastlife S4 into a thousand parts like those tiktoks where they post a whole episode of a tv series
1 note · View note
pkducklett · 1 year ago
Text
Using AI to roleplay is cowardly and traitorous to the hardworking fans who give you fanworks for free. You should feel ashamed if you continue to use it.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
166K notes · View notes
windupaidoneus · 8 months ago
Text
in a sense i can tell emet & i have like very similar standards when it comes to quality. by that i mean i am very picky with art styles especially when it comes to how people draw my favourite guys & i KNOW in a fucked up really weird world where hes real & im the character (well ok due to introject stuff its not that far fetched but bear with me) he would hold fanart of me to the same standards i hold his. does that make sense.
#i am very pretentious with art i just never say it. i do apply it to my own art too tho that is why im extremely harsh on my own art#i want a level of skill i simply am not at yet & it ruins my life. but that aside#i am VERY particular about how well people manage to draw emets features. due to him having such a unique face in xiv#characteristic eyebrows. a nose thats actually too big for most face wear that covers the nose. his shallow cheeks. the glare. the lips#miss any of these (if you have a very detailed style) & its not him anymore. dont bishiefy him.#as much i love the evilness of the magic art ('art' looking at mtgs ai practices...) the nose stood out to me as too small.#maybe its the angle but it does not look as big as it should imo.#& i could never ever imagine myself being fully satisfied. with any less than his actual features.#to me it does really speak of a skill issue + less than ideal view of 'unconventionally attractive' or whatever features#when an artist cannot keep to that kind of feature or even attempt to#break out of the 2010s generic anime art style pretty please. im like begging on my knees.#if youre gonna be drawing my guy you cannot just make him random anime boy number fifty four he does not look like that.#but. yeah. see what i mean. im pretentious. honestly probably why i keep to sketches most of the time#i do not have the patience to add as much detail as id like to finished products#& it drives me fucking insaneeee <333#the diff btwn emet & i is that hed probably have the skill to not hate whatever he creates#emey selchie tag
1 note · View note
wiisagi-maiingan · 1 month ago
Text
I saw someone recently say that they use chatGPT to get information about language rules (grammar, sentence structure, translations, etc) for languages that are very rare and have pretty much no information available online.
And that really stuck out to me because generative AI like chatGPT does not think. It doesn't magically have information about every single language in the world in its database. Generative AI works by deciding what words are most likely to be next to each other in a sentence, based on information it pulls from either its internal database or from whatever online resources it is given access to.
So if you're looking for information about, for example, Ojibwemowin grammar and you can't find ANY information about it online no matter how long you search, but chatGPT somehow has the exact information you're looking for? Then whatever chatGPT is telling you was made up. It took a bunch of different resources about a bunch of different languages, probably using pages that mentioned Ojibwe once or twice, and smashed it all together into something that looked somewhat coherent to someone who doesn't actually know the facts. Whether it's accurate or not doesn't matter because that isn't actually the purpose of generative AI.
2K notes · View notes
ohnoitstbskyen · 1 month ago
Note
You’ve probably been asked this before, but do you have a specific view on ai-generated art. I’m doing a school project on artificial intelligence and if it’s okay, i would like to cite you
I mean, you're welcome to cite me if you like. I recently wrote a post under a reblog about AI, and I did a video about it a while back, before the full scale of AI hype had really started rolling over the Internet - I don't 100% agree with all my arguments from that video anymore, but you can cite it if you please.
In short, I think generative AI art
Is art, real art, and it's silly to argue otherwise, the question is what KIND of art it is and what that art DOES in the world. Generally, it is boring and bland art which makes the world a more stressful, unpleasant and miserable place to be.
AI generated art is structurally and inherently limited by its nature. It is by necessity averages generated from data-sets, and so it inherits EVERY bias of its training data and EVERY bias of its training data validators and creators. It naturally tends towards the lowest common denominator in all areas, and it is structurally biased towards reinforcing and reaffirming the status quo of everything it is turned to.
It tends to be all surface, no substance. As in, it carries the superficial aesthetic of very high-quality rendering, but only insofar as it reproduces whatever signifiers of "quality" are most prized in its weighted training data. It cannot understand the structures and principles of what it is creating. Ask it for a horse and it does not know what a "horse" is, all it knows is what parts of it training data are tagged as "horse" and which general data patterns are likely to lead an observer to identify its output also as "horse." People sometimes describe this limitation as "a lack of soul" but it's perhaps more useful to think of it as a lack of comprehension.
Due to this lack of comprehension, AI art cannot communicate anything - or rather, the output tends to attempt to communicate everything, at random, all at once, and it's the visual equivalent of a kind of white noise. It lacks focus.
Human operators of AI generative tools can imbue communicative meaning into the outputs, and whip the models towards some sort of focus, because humans can do that with literally anything they turn their directed attention towards. Human beings can make art with paint spatters and bits of gum stuck under tennis shoes, of course a dedicated human putting tons of time into a process of trial and error can produce something meaningful with genAI tools.
The nature of genAI as a tool of creation is uniquely limited and uniquely constrained, a genAI tool can only ever output some mixture of whatever is in its training data (and what's in its training data is biased by the data that its creators valued enough to include), and it can only ever output that mixture according to the weights and biases of its programming and data set, which is fully within the control of whoever created the tool in the first place. Consequently, genAI is a tool whose full creative capacity is always, always, always going to be owned by corporations, the only entities with the resources and capacity to produce the most powerful models. And those models, thus, will always only create according to corporate interest. An individual human can use a pencil to draw whatever the hell they want, but an individual human can never use Midjourney to create anything except that which Midjourney allows them to create. GenAI art is thus limited not only by its mathematical tendency to bias the lowest common denominator, but also by an ideological bias inherited from whoever holds the leash on its creation. The necessary decision of which data gets included in a training set vs which data gets left out will, always and forever, impose de facto censorship on what a model is capable of expressing, and the power to make that decision is never in the hands of the artist attempting to use the tool.
tl;dr genAI art has a tendency to produce ideologically limited and intrinsically censored outputs, while defaulting to lowest common denominators that reproduce and reinforce status quos.
... on top of which its promulgation is an explicit plot by oligarchic industry to drive millions of people deeper into poverty and collapse wages in order to further concentrate wealth in the hands of the 0.01%. But that's just a bonus reason to dislike it.
2K notes · View notes
oyasleepy · 1 year ago
Text
i miss deviantart so so so so so fucking bad rn
#oyaspeaky#like . i dont miss the niche drama stuff#but i DO miss being able to generally easily sell designs n comms & the ability to just... Be Around other artists#without having to fucking hunt for them constantly on every new social media i join .#i miss passing around the same $30 between a circle of like 5 artists comming each other...#before it went to shit deviantart was probably the most comfortable ive ever been on a “social media” type site#and tbh! while there r many alternatives trying to fill the void! none of em hit right for me ):#none of the ones ive tried anyway!#it's not worth trying to go back now though bc the site itself scrapes everything posted for ai (unless u opt out. ig)#and theres tons of people just posting ai “adoptables.” with the site's . Built In ai feature. <3#love that. thanks#being an Artist on Social Media outside of deviantart feels a lot more . like . pressured?#it feels more like even hobbyists get treated as Content Machines and not . like. someone just drawing bc they want to...#idk! im rambling . i just have a lot of thoughts abt it... i miss what deviantart used to be#even though i met some of the worst ppl ive ever met over there. i also met some of the most important ppl in my life#thats just how itd be on any site ever i think.........#the real bottom line here is i have got to get more comfortable posting abt ocs in public i feel like a shaken bottle of soda#<- thats related. i promise . im just very tired and im not gonna explain the mental link . haha byebye#if u read all of this . i give u a BEEG forehead kiss. thank u
1 note · View note
bluevveather · 1 year ago
Text
Op and this reblog as well as the vast majority of the people in notes are 100% correct about it being extremely disrespectful and enraging(the explanation of what the original painting was and means is also very very good to spread) but seem to be missing the actual point of the tweet iirc.
Tumblr media
Rage. In my heart. All-consuming. FUCK AI.
#very sure i remember that tweet actually being a parody of the soulless insensitive people want to do with AI#you can definitely say that they picked a bad piece to do it with but the rage it causes does prove it was a very effective one#sorry ive#gone through art school stuff where this kinda art came up#oooh fuck id wanna show this tweet to one of my art teachers#the one who brought up having art be the reaction people have to it just as much if not more than the original piece#did a piece like this and like.. probably didnt intend for it to be art the way it ended up or for it to gain such reach#it was just meant as a funny edgy criticism of using computer generation to take from the dead through parody#im not 100% sure of this and again if anyone sees these additions its not meant to downplay the rightousness of the anger ppl feel#its just such a good example of the shit i learned during my art education#like im kinda debating on whether i should send a screenshot(censored usernames of course) to my old professor#*soulless insensitive shit people want to do with ai#also used the word parody instead of satire cause i mixed up the meanings of the english word#god im sorry for all the tags the art student part of me just went crazy#many tags#long tags#art#remember#hope this isnt a sorry my follower made that comment moment cause again this being satire does not in any way invalidate being upset#also again im reading into this a lot a real blue curtains moment or whatever im v sure the person who made the tweet didnt mean#to make a far reaching reaction art piece but rather just did an edgy joke at the expense of companies who do/want to do that stuff#the tweet probably shouldnt have even been made something something if satire isnt recognised by most ppl as satire its bad satire
82K notes · View notes
bluegiragi · 2 months ago
Text
I really don’t care if I’m considered an annoying luddite forever, I will genuinely always hate AI and I’ll think less of you if you use it. ChatGPT, Generative AI, those AI chatbots - all of these things do nothing but rot your brain and make you pathetic in my eyes. In 2025? You’re completely reliant on a product owned by tech billionaires to think for you, write for you, inspire you, in 2025????
“Oh but I only use ___ for ideas/spellcheck/inspiration!!” I kinda don’t care? oh, you’re “only” outsourcing a major part of the creative process that would’ve made your craft unique to you. Writing and creating art has been one of the most intrinsically human activities since the dawn of time, as natural and central to our existence as the creation of the goddamn wheel, and sheer laziness and a culture of instant gratification and entitlement is making swathes of people feel not only justified in outsourcing it but ahead of the curve!!
And genuinely, what is the point of talking to an AI chatbot, since people looove to use my art for it and endlessly make excuses for it. RP exists. Fucking daydreaming exists. You want your favourite blorbo to sext you, there’s literally thousands of xreader fic out there. And if it isn’t, write it yourself! What does a computer’s best approximation of a fictional character do that a human author couldn’t do a thousand times better. Be at your beck and call, probably, but what kind of creative fulfilment is that? What scratch is that itching? What is it but an entirely cyclical ourobouros feeding into your own validation?
I mean, for Christ sakes there are people using ChatGPT as therapists now, lauding it for how it’s better than any human therapist out there because it “empathises”, and no one ever likes to bring up how ChatGPT very notably isn’t an accurate source of information, and often just one that lives for your approval. Bad habits? Eh, what are you talking about, ChatGPT told me it’s fine, because it’s entire existence is to keep you using it longer and facing any hard truths or encountering any real life hard times when it comes to your mental health journey would stop that!
I just don’t get it. Every single one of these people who use these shitty AIs have a favourite book or movie or song, and they are doing nothing by feeding into this hype but ensuring human originality and sincere passion will never be rewarded again. How cute! You turned that photo of you and your boyfriend into ghibli style. I bet Hayao Miyazaki, famously anti-war and pro-environmentalist who instills in all his movies a lifelong dedication to the idea that humanity’s strongest ally is always itself, is so happy that your request and millions of others probably dried up a small ocean’s worth of water, and is only stamping out opportunities for artists everywhere, who could’ve all grown up to be another Miyazaki. Thanks, guys. Great job all round.
2K notes · View notes