#That will never stop being funny to me

[theglizzardwizard]

I still don’t get how the 0 note bangers not only made their way to cc staff but that they got so mad about them that they had to change their entire community guidelines just to fuck you and your friend over. Do these people not have jobs?? Real jobs?? Other than grooming each other and scrolling their porn twitter feeds? Like if they got jobs that forced them to learn a trade or a skill or just got them off the internet for 8 hours a day it would not affect them literally at all

I try not to publish anons more than once a day but I really love your energy here. I feel the same way.

They literally had to CHANGE THE RULES on my behalf and DIDN'T EVEN BAN ME. I am literally in a cog building right now.

[starstruckodysseys]

thinking abt the fact that like half the nsbu cast still had d4 sneak by the finale. their asses were NOT being secretive

[dukeofthomas]

Here's my controversial opinion; if you're trying to write Bruce as a non-abusive, good parent, you should also write him respecting his kids' privacy, boundaries, and not stalking&surveying them.

[stark-lord]

Side A

[ewanmitchellcrumbs]

Tyland Lannister rocking up for work the next morning and realising he doesn’t have to put up with that little shit messing around with his giant marble:

[aeste]

Sometimes I feel a bit like a clown; but then I see how Kuya looks at Eiden, and I remember that there is someone here who is the entire fucking circus🤡🎪

[to-be-a-dreamer]

I’m not gonna lie it took me a full 24 hours to figure out why “Kristen Applebees kills 90 people in senior year” was so funny because even though my ears heard “senior year” my brain autofilled “junior year” so I thought the whole entire joke was just lying about Kristen’s kill count and I was really confused why it broke the table and also the fandom as hard as it did

[manchesterau]

happy 15 years of dan and phil!

[rhiangalaxy]

Part two to this AU!

[ID: A Scum Villain Comic. Image one depicts a chibi version of Gongyi Xiao and Ming Fan. Ming Fan looks towards GYX and asks "Shidi, I was wondering...What made you chose Qing Jing?". Image two shows GYX resting his head against one of his hands with a bashful look and responding, "Well... I chose Qing Jing because Shizun is so-" This sentence continues into the next image with the words "Kind... Elegant..." the image depicting Shen Qingqiu smiling, and another side profile SQQ with his fan covering the lower half of his face. The last image, has a slightly out of focus GYX, both hands up to his face with a lovestruck expression, continuing to ramble "Smart...Strong...". Ming Fan behind him looks on with a horrified/disgusted expression. A box caption above him stating "Having Disiciple!LBH Flashbacks". End ID]

[hooved]

[m3llowm1sh]

i miss them sometimes

[hyperlexichypatia]

Follow up to this post where I was asked about the "Autism presents differently in girls" myth, which is one of my many berserk buttons.

Here is a non-exhaustive list of reasons this concept makes no sense and you should stop saying it:

A. Autistic people are more likely than non-autistic people to be trans, nonbinary, or otherwise gender-non-conforming, so any attempt to group autistic people by binary, birth-assigned gender is even less likely to be accurate than the gender binary already is in the general population.

2. There is absolutely no evidence supporting the "presents differently" theory that could not be better explained by clinician bias.

iii. The alleged "presentation differences" between autistic "girls" and "boys" are just bog-standard gender stereotypes with "autism" plugged in somewhere. "Boys are better at math and science and logic and not having feelings and their dominant emotion is Anger, but girls are better at socializing and caretaking and brushing hair and their dominant emotion is Approval-Seeking." "Huh, that sounds like reactionary sexist hogwash." "No, I mean, autistic boys are better at math and science and logic and not having feelings and their dominant emotion is Anger, but but autistic girls are better at socializing and caretaking and brushing hair and their dominant emotion is Approval-Seeking." "Oh, okay, now it's Objective Science."

four. Sexist bias, including among clinicians, tends to frame "male" neurodivergence as essentially cognitive and "female" neurodivergence as essentially emotional, because, as we all know, Men Think, Women Feel. Psychology is obsessed with the idea that "girls" are universally and inherently self-loathing and self-destructive -- anything a "girl" has trouble with cannot possible be a skill she hasn't learned or an ability she doesn't have, let alone merely a different way of being; she must simply be self-abnegatingly denying herself the thing she cannot do. So a "girl" with the same traits as an "autistic boy" will have those traits attributed to something emotional, like depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, or eating disorders. "Autistic girls" aren't being "missed" (read as neurotypical); they're having their exact same autistic traits as "autistic boys" being framed as mood disorders instead of neurodevelopmental disabilities.

cinco. Fundamentally, this premise gets completely backward what diagnosis means and why pathologization happens. People are pathologized and diagnosed, with any kind of disability, when they have traits that fall outside the range of traits considered "acceptable" for their position. "It's more acceptable for boys to have meltdowns, so autistic boys have more meltdowns than autistic girls, so the boys get diagnosed with autism" -- No, this doesn't make sense. That's not how diagnosis works. If it were more acceptable for boys to have meltdowns, then boys who have meltdowns would not be getting diagnosed with anything. Their behavior would not be seen as pathological. If "It's more acceptable for boys to have meltdowns" were to explain any kind of diagnosis differential, it would be "Therefore girls who have meltdowns are diagnosed, while boys who have meltdowns are just considered normal boys." And, to be clear, that kind of thing is absolutely a factor in gender differences in diagnosis, but in the opposite direction from how people mean it. Like, as a "girl," I wasn't really expected or pressured to be athletic, so my absolutely abysmal gross motor skills were just shrugged at and not seen as a sign of disability. Can't run or throw? Well, I was a girl, and a nerd to boot. What do you expect? A "boy" with my level of gross motor skills would draw a lot more Concern.

ζ. "Girls are pressured to mimic/mask more than boys are," even if true (debatable), elides over the fact that many autistic "girls" can't "mimic/mask," because they are disabled. They have a disability. Because some of the things their society expects them to be able to do are things that they cannot, in fact, do. "Girls don't have meltdowns because they're not allowed to. Girls don't forget to do essential tasks because they're not allowed to. Girls don't --" Okay but they do. Girls do in fact very much do those things. Because they are disabled. Because they have disabilities. Because there are things they are expected to be able to do, which they cannot, in fact, do. And it's weirdly disability-erasing (ableist) to claim that people simply develop the ability to do things they can't do just because they're expected to.

heptad. Circling back to point A., while I can't prove it, I really think a lot of this "gendered autism" stuff is a way to pathologize and also explain away queerness/transness/gender-non-conformity in diagnosed-autistic kids. "Oh, no, don't worry, the reason your son consistently Fails At Masculinity isn't because he's some kind of sissy; it's actually because he has this Masculine Male Boy Disorder where he just doesn't understand how boys are supposed to behave. Lots of boys have it. No, no, the reason your 12 year old son is kissing his male friend on the mouth isn't because he's gay; he just has a social skills disorder and doesn't know that boys don't kiss their platonic guy mate dude friends. It's a very masculine disability. Elon Musk has it." I know somebody who was told by an Autism Mom that all autistic people are bisexual because "They don't know the difference." Sure, keep telling yourself that.

8️⃣. In the past, when I was less Galaxy Brain Mad Radicalized, I conceptualized the phenomenon of "'Boys' are diagnosed with autism while 'girls' with the exact same traits are diagnosed with depression/anxiety/OCD/BPD/ED" as a phenomenon of "Autistic girls, who objectively are autistic, whose objectively, scientifically correct diagnosis is autism, are misdiagnosed with psych disorders instead." But what neither autistic nor Mad people really want to admit is that "autism" is as arbitrary a diagnostic category as any other. No two human brains are exactly alike. All systems of classification are made up. I happen to think that the proposed explanatory mechanism of "autism" (brain processes sensory input/information differently than average, results in wildly uneven skill development) is generally more accurate than the proposed explanatory mechanism of most psych diagnoses (people are weird somehow and that's bad somehow), but it's still fairly arbitrary. People with autism diagnoses get ABA and people with psych diagnoses get CBT/DBT, and you can argue about which is worse, but ultimately anything with a B in it is fundamentally abusive. Abolish psychiatry.

[arom-antix]

I bring to thee some quick late night Viktuuri sketches because I think we could all use some fluff

[soundleer]

dummyhead (affectionate)

[potatobugz]

i was hacked by a very unhappy man!

[vanityangel]

Solo Sikoa utilizing his most powerful weapon against Roman Reigns: Annoying Little Cousin Energy™