#Tamir Pardo

[vyorei]

Oh shut up

[mounadiloun]

L'apartheid dans l'entité sioniste vu par ses dirigeants

On se souvient de l’hostilité à laquelle avait été en butte l’ancien président des États Unis Jimmy Carter  après la publication en 2006 de son livre «Palestine: la paix, pas l’apartheid». Ce président qui avait somme toute laissé de lui une image assez sympathique dans l’opinion internationale  avait pu être dès lors affublé du qualificatif infamant d’antisémite. Ce qui est certain est que ce…

[hero-israel]

What do you think about Tamir Pardo and his recent words about apartheid?

I'm confused because according to pro-palestinian activists, apartheid is the fact that for Israelites and Palestinians the Israeli justice system has a different approach, so two legal systems. According to pro-israelis, there is no apartheid, because both Arabs and Jews live together and shame same public spaces. So it seems like both sides are using different definitions of what apartheid is.

Former Mossad director Tamir Pardo - who served in the Sayeret Metkal under Yonatan Netanyahu - said in September that he believes Israel is enforcing an apartheid system in the West Bank. High-ranking Israeli officials have been warning for years that such a thing could happen. Pardo is probably the most important to say that, by his estimation, they are there now.

Pardo didn't say that a mere four months earlier, in May, when he co-wrote this op-ed that I agree with down to the letter.

What changed in the administration of the West Bank in those four months? Nothing.

My perspective on the "apartheid" term is written in more detail here - and please read through the comments because it is fair to include viewpoints from an actual Israeli like @kwippo. Pro-Palestinians as a rule consider every inch of Israel to be "apartheid," that it is "apartheid" to have Yom Kippur be a bank holiday or for postage stamps to have a menorah on them. That is to be dismissed out of hand. I would not hesitate to stack 1949-armistice-line Israel's treatment of minorities favorably against literally any other country in the world.

The occupied West Bank has a differential system based on nationality, not race, because that's what happens during a military occupation. This distinction used to matter to certain people, and by "certain people" I mean the likes of Human Rights Watch, which spit fire at Israel all through their 2010 report but included a long aside about how the occupation of the West Bank is not apartheid. Once again, nothing changed since then in the administration of the West Bank. Not in the last four months. Not in the 11 years between that report and another by HRW that said "actually nevermind it's totes apartheid after all." Not to this day. So I reject using a change in terminology motivated not by any change in materially lived experience but rather by fear of the future and dissatisfaction in the lack of progress. The current parlance of the Extremely Online Left is to vindictively say that the very step that could make a 2-state-solution possible - having separate systems along the footprints of separate states - is somehow "apartheid," and the only thing that can stop this "apartheid" is to erase those very distinctions and erase Israel too.

The current ultra-extremist fringe government in Israel is saying - frequently - that they WANT to change the administration of the West Bank. That is scaring basically everyone who hears it who doesn't live in the West Bank already.

With all due respect to Pardo, he is still acting as a political figure in this context and political figures exaggerate to make their points. I love Joe Biden and am relieved every day that he is president, and in 2012 Joe Biden said the Republican Party - under Mitt Romney - wanted to put African-Americans "back in chains."

[political-us]

Former Israeli peace negotiator Daniel Levy joins Zeteo as a contributor and unpacks this week's resumption of Israel's violence in Gaza.

Israeli officials have claimed that the resumed strikes create leverage in getting Hamas to accept Israeli terms for a deal. Lies, pure and simple. Israeli war crimes failed to shift the terms of a deal for over a year. Hamas is negotiating in accordance with the parameters agreed in January, Netanyahu is not. On Wednesday, Hamas clarified that “any proposal based on negotiating the second stage and permanently ending the war will be welcomed.”

Protesters inside Israel are also calling out Netanyahu’s bluff. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum issued a statement calling for a renewed ceasefire, dismissing the government's claim that a return to war is “for the sake of hostages' return” as “a complete deception,” and blaming the government for “withdrawing from the agreement” and endangering the hostages. Former Mossad chief Tamir Pardo, addressing a Tel Aviv rally, accused Netanyahu of “start[ing] yet another round of war ... not to protect your people but to protect your government. Another war with no purpose, another war with no strategy.”

[workersolidarity]

[ 📹 Scenes of chaos and horror after the Israeli occupation army bombed a gathering of civilians attempting to obtain a clear internet signal in the Al-Jarn area of the Jabalia Camp, in the northern Gaza Strip, resulting in the deaths of at least three Palestinians. 📈 The endlessly rising death toll in the Zionist entity's ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip now exceeds 37'713 Palestinians killed and over 86'377 others wounded since October 7th. ]

🇮🇱⚔️🇵🇸 🚀����️💥🚑 🚨

WAR IN GAZA, DAY 264: SENIOR ISRAELI OFFICIALS AND ACADEMICS DEMAND U.S. CANCEL NETANYAHU'S VISIT TO CONGRESS, GENOCIDE GOES ON AS CIVILIANS ARE TARGETED BY OCCUPATION BOMBS

On 264th day of the Israeli occupation's ongoing special genocide operation in the Gaza Strip, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) committed a total of 4 new massacres of Palestinian families, resulting in the deaths of no less than 60 Palestinian civilians, mostly women and children, while another 140 others were wounded over the previous 24-hours.

It should be noted that as a result of the constant Israeli bombardment of Gaza's healthcare system, infrastructure, residential and commercial buildings, local paramedic and civil defense crews are unable to recover countless hundreds, even thousands, of victims who remain trapped under the rubble, or who's bodies remain strewn across the streets of Gaza.

This leaves the official death toll vastly undercounted as Gaza's healthcare officials are unable to accurately tally those killed and maimed in this genocide, which must be kept in mind when considering the scale of the mass murder.

Writing in an opinion piece published by the New York Times, several former Israeli officials and academics have called upon the United States to cancel a planned speech to the Congress by the embattled Zionist entity's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

The officials writing the opinion piece include David Harel, President of the Israeli Academy of the Sciences and Humanities; Tamir Pardo, former director of the Mossad spy agency; Talia Sasson, former director of the special tasks department at "Israel's" State Attorney's Office; Ehud Barack, the former Israeli Prime Minister; and Aaron Ciechanover, winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

The officials and academics write that inviting Netanyahu to speak before Congress is a "terrible mistake," and that his appearance before Congress will "not represent the State of Israel and its citizens," resulting in the rewarding of Netanyahu's "scandalous and destructive conduct."

Coming from positions of politics, the sciences, technology, defense and law, the writers feel they are well placed to judge the effects of Netanyahu's extremist government, adding that "like many, we believe that he is driving Israel downhill at an alarming speed, to the extent that we may eventually lose the country we love."

The officials continue by saying that Netanyahu and his regime have failed to create a plan for ending the war in the Gaza Strip, and that the Occupation Prime Minister has been unable to secure the release of Israeli hostages detained by the Palestinian Resistance in the Strip.

"At the very least, an invitation to address Congress should have been contingent upon resolving these two issues and, in addition, calling for new elections in Israel," they write in the Times.

The officials go on to declare that, "Inviting Mr. Netanyahu will reward his contempt for U.S. efforts to establish a peace plan, allow more aid to the beleaguered people of Gaza and do a better job of sparing civilians."

They warn that, again and again, the Netanyahu administration has rejected U.S. President Joe Biden's plans to remove Hamas from its position of power in the Gaza Strip by establishing a peacekeeping force in the Palestinian enclave.

"Such a move would very likely bring in its wake a far broader regional alliance, including a vision to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is not only in Israel’s interest but also in the interest of both political parties in the United States. Mr. Netanyahu constitutes the main obstacle to these outcomes," the officials said in the Times.

"The man who will address Congress next month has failed to assume responsibility for the blunders that allowed the Hamas assault, initially blaming security chiefs (then quickly backtracking), and has yet to announce the establishment of a direly needed state commission of inquiry headed by a Supreme Court judge to look into the fiasco," they added.

The writers go on to list the many ways in which the Israeli Prime Minister has weakened the Israeli occupation, while giving examples of the ways in which Netanyahu's coalition partners endanger the rights of Israeli citizens, including the example of the violent suppression of Israeli protests against the government, as well as Netanyahu's insistence on enshrining into law the exemption from military service for the Ultra-Orthodox at a time of war.

"Above all, many Israelis are convinced that Mr. Netanyahu has obstructed proposed deals with Hamas that would have led to the release of the hostages in order to keep the war going and thus avoid the inevitable political reckoning he will face when it ends," the former officials and academics said of Netanyahu's corrupt administration.

The writers go on to point to Israeli public opinion, which they say has turned against the Prime Minister's administration as Netanyahu's coalition hangs on tightly to its slim majority in the Israeli Knesset.

The officials continue by slamming Netanyahu's seeming lack of concern for the hundreds of thousands of Israelis displaced by Hezbollah's retaliation in the north of the occupied Palestinian territories, resulting from the continued Zionist aggression in the Gaza Strip, while growing demonstrations in the occupied territories threaten Netanyahu's position as the protest movement continues to grow in strength.

"That’s where Mr. Netanyahu’s speech to Congress fits in with his political needs. No doubt it will be carefully stage-managed to prop up his shaky hold on power and allow him to boast to his constituents about America’s so-called support for his failed policies," the officials said of Netanyahu's speech to Congress.

They warn that Likud and the far-right's supporters in the occupied territories will be emboldened by the speech before Congress, coming to the conclusion that it will further hinder the chances of making a deal that could see the Israeli hostages released.

The officials conclude by saying, "Giving Mr. Netanyahu the stage in Washington will all but dismiss the rage and pain of his people, as expressed in the demonstrations throughout the country. American lawmakers should not let that happen. They should ask Mr. Netanyahu to stay home."

Meanwhile, the Israeli occupation's ongoing special genocide operation continued in the Gaza Strip, with several airstrikes overnight and into the morning that resulted in dozens of casualties.

In just a few examples of the Zionist entity's war crimes in Gaza, an occupation air raid targeted a residential house belonging to the Abu Awad family in the city of Beit Lahiya, in the northern Gaza Strip, with initial reports stating that three Palestinians were killed in the assault, while at least a dozen others were wounded.

Subsequently, additional reporting stated the death toll in the Beit Lahiya strike had risen to 15, while several others remained in critical condition.

Following that strike, occupation aircraft fired a missile towards a gathering of civilians attempting to obtain an internet signal in the Al-Jarn area of the town of Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip, after which, three Palestinians who were killed in the strike were transferred to the Indonesian Hospital in the city of Beit Lahiya.

At the same time, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) bombed, and detonated with explosives, several residential homes in neighborhoods southwest of Gaza City, as well as the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, southeast of the city, while the systematic destruction of residential neighborhoods and public infrastructure in the city of Rafah in the south continued unabated.

According to local reporting, the occupation army detonated a number of residential squares in the Saudi neighborhood, west of Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, as well as in neighborhoods east and northeast of Khan Yunis, while violent occupation artillery shelling and airstrikes hammered the Nuseirat Camp, in the central Gaza Strip.

Local reporting states that a number of civilians were killed, and many others wounded, as a result of IOF artillery shelling of various neighborhoods of Gaza City, including the Al-Sabra, Al-Zaytoun, and Tal al-Hawa neighborhoods.

Simultaneously, Zionist artillery detatchments resumed their bombardment of the eastern areas of the Bureij Refugee Camp, as well as targeting agricultural lands west of the Nuseirat Camp, both in the central Gaza Strip.

Local reports write that 5 civilians were killed in an artillery strike, and were subsequently taken to Al-Awda Hospital in the Nuseirat Camp after being targeted in their residential apartment, while occupation artillery shelling also targeted farmers in the grape vineyards, west of the New Camp area in the Nuseirat Camp.

Occupation soldiers also detonated a number of residential buildings in the vicinity of the Zoroub roundabout, west of the city of Rafah, south of Gaza, coinciding with heavy artillery shelling of the central and western neighborhoods of the city.

Palestinian sources have also reported that a number of wounded civilians arrived at the European Gaza Hospital in the city of Khan Yunis, south of Gaza, after intense occupation bombing pummeled citizen's homes in the town of Al-Khuza'a.

As a result of the Israeli occupation's ongoing war of extermination in the Gaza Strip, the infinitely rising death toll now exceeds 37'718 Palestinians killed, including at least 10'000 women and more than 15'000 children, while another 86'377 others have been wounded since the start of the current round of Zionist aggression, beginning with the events of October 7th, 2023.

June 26th, 2024.

#source1

#source2

#source3

#source4

#source5

#videosource

#graphicsource

@WorkerSolidarityNews

[howieabel]

Israel is enforcing apartheid in the West Bank, says former Mossad spy chief Tamir Pardo

[solo1y]

Is Israel An Apartheid State?

Almost every international human rights organisation has explained why Israel is an apartheid state, including the United Nations and Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, who all conducted comprehensive reviews.

Zionists and their friends often accuse these organisations of bias or even antisemitism, that the reason they accuse Israel of being an apartheid state is because they hate Jews. This is ridiculous, but let's operate inside the delusion.

The Israeli Jewish-run human rights group, B'Tselem, has produced many reports explaining how the apartheid system works in the occupied territories. Here is one called The Occupation In Its 51st Year. There are more such documents on their site.

The Israeli Jewish-run human rights group, Yesh Din, has produced many reports explaining how the apartheid system works in the occupied territories. Here is one called The Occupation of the West Bank and the Crime of Apartheid. There are more such documents on their site.

The Israeli Jewish-run paper of record, Ha'aretz, has published many articles about the apartheid system in Israel. Here is one called Israel is an Apartheid Regime. There are more such articles on their site.

And it's not just humans rights and media organisations.

Amiram Levin, who headed the IDF Northern Command said there is "absolute apartheid" in the West Bank.

Yossi Sarid, a former Israeli cabinet minister and ex-leader of the opposition said, "it is apartheid".

Ehud Barak, former prime minister of Israel, said if "millions of Palestinians cannot vote, that will be an apartheid state" and that Bibi Netanyahu and his friends are "undermining the foundations of Zionism and Israeli democracy".

Israel’s former attorney general, Michael Ben-Yair, said, "We established an apartheid regime..."

In 2021, 25% of American Jews agreed outright that "Israel is an apartheid state".

Former prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, said in 1976 that if Israel did not evacuate the entire West Bank of Palestinians, "I don’t think it’s possible to contain over the long term, if we don’t want to get to apartheid". (The Israelis have not yet evacuated the West Bank, although they're giving Gaza a pretty thorough sluice.

Tamir Pardo, the former director of Mossad (Israeli national intelligence agency), said, "There is an apartheid state here."

In 2015, another former head of Mossad, Meir Dagan, said that Bibi's policies would lead to either a binational state "or an apartheid state".

There are many more.

At what point does your insistence that you know more than every international human rights organisation, Jewish Israeli human rights agencies, the Israeli paper of record, ex-prime ministers, ex-heads of the IDF and Mossad and a large number of Jews themselves become antisemitic?

[johnbjustiniano]

Exclusivo: O Homem que Vendeu Gaza

Um folhetim por Yehokhanan Capítulo III

A trama

Em 2010, em uma reunião secreta com o diretor do Mossad, Tamir Pardo, e o ministro da Defesa, Ehud Barak, Netanyahu deu luz verde para a operação. O plano era ambicioso: S. seria libertado em 2011, como parte da troca de prisioneiros que incluía Gilad Shalit, e se infiltraria no Hamas como um agente duplo. Uma vez em Gaza, ele trabalharia para minar o grupo de dentro, enquanto fornecia a Israel informações cruciais.

No entanto, o plano foi além. Netanyahu e seus colaboradores viram em S. a oportunidade de criar uma crise controlada: um ataque do Hamas suficientemente impactante para justificar uma resposta militar esmagadora de Israel, mas que não causasse danos irreparáveis. O objetivo era fortalecer a imagem de Netanyahu como o único líder capaz de proteger Israel, enquanto enfraquecia o Hamas a longo prazo.

CONTINUA...

Exclusive: The Man Who Sold Gaza

A Serial by Yehokhanan Chapter III

The Plot

In 2010, in a secret meeting with Mossad Director Tamir Pardo and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Netanyahu gave the green light for the operation. The plan was ambitious: S. would be released in 2011, as part of a prisoner swap that included Gilad Shalit, and would infiltrate Hamas as a double agent. Once in Gaza, he would work to undermine the group from within, while providing Israel with crucial information. However, the plan went further. Netanyahu and his associates saw in S. the opportunity to create a controlled crisis: a Hamas attack impactful enough to justify an overwhelming Israeli military response, but one that would not cause irreparable damage. The goal was to strengthen Netanyahu’s image as the only leader capable of protecting Israel, while weakening Hamas in the long term.

TO BE CONTINUED...

[insightdaily]

Ex-Mossad chief Pardo: Gov’t has opened 'gates of hell' on hostages with return to war

"The gates of hell may have opened for the Gazans, but without a doubt, they have fully opened for the 59 hostages, with no savior in sight."

Former Mossad chief Tamir Pardo criticized the government's decision to resume the war last week, stating that it has effectively "opened the gates of hell" for the Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

Speaking at the Meir Dagan Conference at Netanya Academic College, Pardo remarked, "The gates of hell might have opened on the Gazans, but for sure, they have opened on the 59 hostages, and there is no savior for them."

He also condemned the government's impact on democracy, emphasizing that only protests can restore liberal democracy.

[heliophile-oxon]

... and by Amnesty International.

And by Tamir Pardo, a former head of fucking Mossad (as reported by The Guardian, ABCNews, APNews and multiple other media outlets in multiple countries).

(For some reason, when I post this it looks like tumblr is automatically adding some bullshit about the source being twitter, and I can't delete it; I just want to add that twitter has precisely the square root of fuck-all to do with this. Seriously, tumblr, what the actual fuck)

[infosisraelnews]

L'ancien chef du Mossad : Netanyahu n'est pas coupable du massacre du 7 octobre

L’ancien chef du Mossad, Tamir Pardo, a été photographié à “Kol Hakhadash” et dans les documents distribués à partir de là, on l’entend dire de sa voix: “Je n’ai aucun doute sur le fait que ce Premier ministre n’est pas coupable de ce qui s’est passé le 7 octobre à 6h30 heures du matin , c’est l’entière responsabilité de Tsahal”. Ce qui s’est passé juste apres fait qu’il a une part respectable,…

[mounadiloun]

Un antisémite chargé de lutter contre l'antisémitisme à Harvard?

On se souvient de la chasse au sorcières qui a visé des présidents d’universités aux Etats Unis, accusés de laxisme face à l’antisémitisme qui caractériserait les  manifestations croissantes de solidarité des étudiants avec la Palestine. Les principales cibles de cette chasse aux sorcières ont été trois femmes présidentes d’universités parmi les plus prestigieuses des États Unis Liz Magill…

[agentfascinateur]

Instead of pursuing revenge, the government should have reached a deal to secure the hostages’ release first and then pursued military objectives.

- Former Mossad Dir. Tamir Pardo

[arrahmahcom]

Media ‘Israel’: Netanyahu Membawa Kita Menuju Kegagalan Total

TEL AVIV (Arrahmah.id) – Tamir Pardo, mantan kepala badan intelijen ‘Israel’ (Mossad), menuduh Perdana Menteri Benjamin Netanyahu – yang katanya telah memasang slogan “Kemenangan Absolut” di benderanya – memimpin ‘Israel’ menuju kegagalan mutlak. Pernyataan ini muncul dalam konteks diskusi di saluran ‘Israel’ mengenai nasib pertempuran yang sedang berlangsung di Jalur Gaza dan konsekuensi…

[kspp]

Promoting Gender Diversity and Integrating the Gender Perspective in Indian Intelligence Agencies.

Promotion of Gender Diversity and Integration of Gender perspective has recently received much attention across domains, but IndianIntelligence Agencies seem to be an exception. Indian Intelligence agencies have failed to become a major part of this discourse. There have been reports and talks around the reforms in intelligence agencies like the IDSA Task Force report “A Case for Intelligence Reforms in India” by R. Banerji and the Bill for Intelligence Reforms introduced by Mannish Tiwari in 2011, but they have all failed to incorporate the gender dimension. Also, though India supports UN Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Agenda, there seems to be a dissonance between India’s international display by contributing female peacekeepers to UN peacekeeping missions and the situation back home (Seth, 2022).

Promoting gender diversity in intelligence institutions is of significance for various reasons. Individuals recruited from diverse backgrounds with different skills, expertise, problem-solving approaches, ideas, perspectives, and cultural experiences will help improve the productivity and quality of engagement and lead to innovation and creativity in intel agencies. Seeing the issue from a gender perspective will strengthen intelligence products and help better decision-making (“Foreign Territory: Women in international relations,” 2019). The options for recruiters will improve as more applicants can apply, attracting the best talent. The intel workforce should reflect the diversity in society, gender diversity is crucial. Inclusion will enhance public trust and confidence in these institutions. Such an approach will also empower the disadvantaged genders.

If we specifically focus on women, some studies and opinions highlight that some skills women possess are most needed for intel jobs. One of the former female agents at the CIA argued that women are better at people skills, i.e., they can read people better, which includes determining their motivations and vulnerabilities; they’re street smart, i.e., they can easily read the potential danger and escape threats proactively; they are better at training foreign assets and are better listeners on the job (Zeigler, 2012). Thoughassociating certain skills with a specific gender can be seen as a perpetuation of stereotypes, it can be viewed as a result of the gendered structures that have been around for centuries, which we strive to change. Tamir Pardo, the head of Mossad, in one of his interviews, said that female agents have a distinct advantage in secret warfare because of their better ability to multitask and suppress their ego to attain goals vis-à-vis men and contrary to the stereotypes, women are good at deciphering situations and their abilities are superior to men in terms of understanding the territory, reading situations, spatial awareness (Zeigler, 2012). The ‘UN Security Gender and security Toolkit’ elaborates that WPS Agenda is important for intelligence agencies as it promotes gender inclusion and advocates using gender analysis for conflict impact, resolution, and recovery, and talks about how women can play a significant role in reducing the harm of gender-based violence and discrimination. UNSCR 2242 calls for the integration of gender in the counterterrorism approach and emphasizes developing gender focussed evidence-based policies to deal better with the impacts of violence on women by conducting gender-sensitive research (DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN Women, 2019).

Seeing the growing number and changing nature of security challenges, adopting a gender-inclusive approach in India’s security and intelligence policy has become far more relevant. India must soon develop a policy with a broad vision for gender inclusion in security and intelligence. A gender-diverse expert committee to review after such a policy is drafted is a must. I doubt if our traditional institutional structures are fully capable of gender-inclusive policymaking. Implementing the provisions of such a policy will need a strategy, resource management, political will, and moving away from systemic inertia. A multi-pronged strategy focussing on recruitment-promotion of diverse genders at all levels, across all intel functions – intelligence collection, collation, control, analysis, and research, and from diverse educational and cultural backgrounds with a gender-inclusive workplace can be deployed. Such a reform, along with other suggested reforms in intel agencies, is in our larger strategic and geopolitical interest. It will impact India’s foreign policymaking and better integrate humanitarian aspects in security and crisis response situations.

Other countries of the world have made significant progress in this regard. USA’s Intelligence Community Diversity and Equal Opportunity Report 2020, UK’s Diversity and Inclusion in the UK Intelligence Community Report 2018, Australia’s ONA Diversity Action Plan 2015-2018, and New Zealand’s Diversity and Inclusion Strategy 2017–2020 reflect this progress. Mossad has 40% females in its staff, with 24% in key senior roles, and is seeking to add more women. Learning from them, India must take concrete steps with necessary modifications in this direction. The best practices employed in other sectors like corporates for gender diversity can also be explored. Indian Intelligence, Security and Foreign policy, thus, need to undergo a structural gender overhaul.

Bibliography

DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN Women (2019), “Intelligence and Gender”, in Gender and Security Toolkit, Geneva: DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN Women: Gender and security toolkit

Foreign territory: Women in international relations. (2019, July 9). Lowy Institute: FOREIGN TERRITORY: WOMEN IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

IDSA Task Force. (2012). A case for intelligence reforms in India. Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses: A Case for Intelligence Reforms in India

ORF: Bill on Intelligence Agencies Reforms

Seth, S. (2022, June 10). India’s inconsistent adherence to the women, peace and security agenda. Lowy Institute: India’s inconsistent adherence to the Women,Peace and Security agenda

Zeigler, M. (2012). Why The Best Spies in Mossad and The CIA Are Women. Forbes: Why The Best Spies in Mossad And The CIA Are Women

[howieabel]

Israel is enforcing apartheid in the West Bank, says former Mossad spy chief Tamir Pardo