#Mystery Solved

[khaopybara]

❝You're always full of surprises, and I didn't know what it was that made me care about you so much. I was worried and concerned about you. I didn't know what it was.❞

CHRISTINE GULASATREE as FOUR SIMESA episode 5 of REVERSE 4 YOU

[greenbeany]

Well I'd say it's pretty obvious which recording session of Wonderlust Charlie showed up to with a hangover

[adorkabletwilightandfriends]

Adorkable Twilight & Friends - “Mystery Solved"

Adorkable Patreon Pals

Adorkable Twilight & Friends Twitter

Adorkable Twilight & Friends Wiki

Adorkable Twilight & Friends Deviant Art

[megamindsecretlair]

Can yall keep an eye out for anyone stealing my work or pretending to be me. I got a bunch of fic reblogs from a blog and an ask from them. But now I think they've blocked me.

Edit: mystery solved! No nefarious intent. Juss a little misunderstanding but it's all cleared up. I love yall, frfr. 🥹🥹🥹

[gl-saveme]

Lada and Earn during their past relationship romantic montage in ep 1

+ us immediately

[chungleallthewaydown]

[salad-006]

SOUND THE EDDSWORLD ALARMS

I HAVE MADE A BREAKTHROUGH

After hours of strenuous and meticulous research, I have found the most solid explaination for Tom's eyes

My magnum opus

And here , ladies and gentleman ,is my proof

FACT NUMBER ONE: TOM DOES NOT HAVE EYEBALLS

We are given several signs his sockets are empty, these being the most prominent ones

In 25ft under the seat he goes to proclaim "Life flashing before my eyes!" However stops before the final word, implying there are no eyes there to be flashed

In Zanta Claws II he receives a set of eyeballs, which he sticks inside his already empty sockets

In spares the clones of Tom have their eyeballs completely removed.

I do not need to explain

FACT NUMBER TWO: SOMETHING IS IN THERE.

Despite proof his sockets are empty, we are given scenes that would suggest otherwise. For example the intro to Moviemakers, where he presses his face against the glass and we can see something squish up against it

However the most important example of this is in Hammer & Fail part 2, where Tom attempts to rub his eyes only for them to sink in when pressure is applied

Obviously regular eyes cant physically do this, this would only happen if there was some sort of thin layer in front of an empty space

For example, a set of inner eyelids.

CONCLUSION: TOM IS A LIZARD PERSON.

The only logical explaination is these inner eyelids that can be opened or closed whenever he wants. (This would also explain why he can consistently touch his 'eyes' without any sort of discomfort, and why his they seem to stick out like eyeballs most of the time)

I have done it.

I have solved the greatest mystery of eddsworld

[grim-has-issues]

my favorite part of gba’s writing is how he continuously asserts that albus can never be and will never be in a “traditional romance”.

when he lives in his own ideal world, he lives in a world void of the woman he claims to love. the only relationship he cares to really cultivate is the one with his family, more specifically his brother.

Even in the non-canon ending of BW, the relationship between albus and faithful is very hedonistic. While he prioritizes the safety of faith and the kids, he stays distant and his non-sexual affection/intimacy is small.

its almost like he cant express himself without the sacrifice of his body and skill.

almost like no one ever taught him.

like he never had the chance.

like no one ever did that to him.

[javelinbk]

John Lennon be like...

[p-redux]

One of the Team just solved one of the Sam Heughan and "mystery blonde" riddles!

So, remember these exclusive source pics I posted in early June 2023? 👇 They were of Sam Heughan leaving his hotel with a mystery blonde the day after the Outlander Season 7 premiere in New York City.

Later and completely separately, another Team member had let me know Sam was following this wellness account based in New York City. 👇

The very attractive blonde who is the founder is named Lauren Hawkins. 👇 I made a mental note in case anything came of it, and forgot all about her...until now.

Well, remember, the sneakers the New York City mystery blonde woman was wearing? 👇

Lauren Hawkins is wearing the same exact sneakers also in June 2023 in New York City. 👇 Matchy matchy! The team member made the connection and DMed me to let me know.

And the long, wavy dirty blonde hair is also an exact match. 👆

The ankle tattoos also match. 👇

This made me think back to another mystery blonde seen having a meal with Sam at New York City restaurant, Jack's Wife Freda. The pic with the blonde with the Kith shopping bags. And long, wavy, dirty blonde hair with thin black sunglasses. This pic was posted by another blogger in May 2023. One month before the sighting by my New York City source. 👇 The bottom pic is Lauren Hawkins. Match matchy again!

I don't know if they dated last year, were or are friends, but the blonde with Sam in my New York City source pics is definitely Lauren Hawkins. So, I'd say that's pretty much Mystery Solved. 🤗

[mastersprogram]

So I Saw this on My Favorite Cosplayers Story last Night ??!

…Luckily it was found Today !!

It’s just CRAZY how I’ve seen this picture before Yet Didn’t noticed his Gloves ??

[buckingham-ashtray]

SHERLOCK DID CHOOSE THE RIGHT PILL. STEVEN SAID SO

After rewatching ASIP again today, I think I might have finally discovered the truth about if Sherlock has chosen the correct pill.

The answer is YES.

I will save you time and tell you right here right now that the truth lies simply in how certain shots were particularly framed. However, if you do wish to discover the Why, then here is the other end of the handcuffs, be my most welcomed guest.

Let me start with a notice that I am as well aware as I can be that A LOT of people have already analyzed this mystery countless times from every possible angle. And while I remain confident in “The Princess Bride Theory” and am sure it's still the most possible solution (given the impossible odds), it might not be the case in Sherlock's situation. Here are two possibilities:

According to Mr Cabbie (Jefferson Hope), Sherlock's "fan" / his sponsor (later revealed to be Moriarty) has warned him about Sherlock in advance:

SHERLOCK: How did you find me?

JEFF: Oh, I recognised yer, soon as I saw you chasing my cab. Sherlock ’olmes! I was warned about you. I’ve been on your website, too. Brilliant stuff! Loved it!

SHERLOCK: Who warned you about me?

JEFF: Just someone out there who’s noticed you.

Now, Mr Cabbie’s kids get money every time their dad murders someone, yes, but since Moriarty has particularly warned Hope about Sherlock instead of warning him OFF Sherlock, it could be possible that the pay would be higher if Hope succeeds in murdering Sherlock. (But also given that Moriarty was much more interested in making Sherlock dance rather than killing him, this assumption is very likely wrong)

The second possibility is that could it be for both types of pills to be harmless to Hope (with his aneurysm), and only one of them deadly to the victims? (This hypothesis is also very unlikely, due to the fact that Hope did not have a real gun and was unlikely capable of strangling full-grown adults to death with his hands if they’ve actually chosen the harmless pill)

Thus, in this meta we are temporarily abandoning The Princess Bride Theory, assuming that there actually were a good pill and a bad pill for Hope as well, and focus entirely on the framing.

[I watched Ben’s new TV series ERIC a month ago and was astonished to realize that I was able to pick up on hidden messages so rapidly during the show. (Really recommend it! And if you’re into interpreting intricate movies as well, definitely watch The Power of the Dog too! I like it so much I am currently reading the novel.) A huge thanks to all you clever clever TJLCers, for that if it wasn’t for you and TJLC I would never have developed this ability at all to write this short meta.]

The key idea is to constantly ask yourself “Why?”. Why is this shot framed that way? Why did that light go out first? Why is this seemingly unimportant detail included here? Why did this dialogue happen?

Why did Steven Moffat write in the script that Hope chose the building on the right?

If there’s one thing I know for certain, it is that NOTHING in BBC Sherlock is there without a reason. So, why was the right building the “right” one, instead of the left? Does it parallel how the two bottles of pills were placed on the table? If we make the assumption that Right is correct and Left is wrong, is there any other evidence to support it?

YES.

1. The pills

WHY is it that EVERY TIME the two pill bottles were given close up shots side by side, it was ALWAYS the one on Hope’s right in focus?

2. The doors

WHY is it that Sherlock and Hope entered through the right side of the door in the right building, and John ran through the left side of the door in the left/wrong building?

WHY is it that John burst through the right side of the door AFTER Sherlock has chosen the pill on the right?

3. The positions

WHY is it that Sherlock was ALWAYS on the left side of the frame and Hope the right without ANY exceptions?

WHY is it that they switched positions AT ONCE, the moment Sherlock chose the pill on the right? (Also note that Sherlock held his pill in his right hand and Hope his left)

Why Why Why?

If it’s just once or twice, we could still dismiss them as “coincidences”. (What did we say about coincidence?) But this many? Implicated in such platent ways? I was an absolute idiot for not seeing this sooner.

If every single shot implies that right is Right and left is Wrong, Hope slid the pill on the left to Sherlock, and Sherlock chose the one originally on the right, is there any possibility that he chose the wrong one?

NOT. A. CHANCE.

All screencaps taken from here.

(I really wanted to tag someone but sadly I don’t know any of you wonderful people and it feels terribly intrusive and impolite to tag someone you don’t know :( Please definitely let me know if you wish to be tagged and thank you so much for coming to my ted talk.)

[tomat0esofalltomat0e]

Ok here’s a rare type of post but let me tell you something that ANNOYS me about Belos.

It’s not his character…but it’s just that whenever I have a cool drawing idea for him I’m smacked in the face with “this won’t work”..and you may be wondering..”whys that?” It’s because..HES SO LIMITED he’s not but when it comes to things he’d actually do my ideas are discarded. This morning I was thinking “oh imagine belos played the organ! I could draw that!” So I searched up if puritan churches had organs…they were banned. So that’s one drawing idea gone 💔 I think there’s been multiple times this has happened to me idk if anyone else has this struggle with him tho.

I GET IT DOESNT RLLY MATTER BUT ALSO IT DOES I WANNA POTRAY HIM CANONICALLY (When it’s out of my aus I suppose)

[captivatedbycillianmurphy]

Mystery solved!

[jigglypuff1994]

What if Ladybug and Chat Noir had a Ghost Hunter show

And the whole time, Ladybug is annoyed with the whole set-up and the camera crew and hates the show but only does it because Chat reeeeeeeeally wanted to do it (and signed them up without asking first)

So, the whole time, it's just Chat being a scaredy cat while simultaneously trying to protect her from the spookies

And she's just sighing loudly behind him because she doesn't believe in the paranormal but she also sorta gets into it because she becomes obsessed with where the noises and spookiness are coming from.

Like she knows it's all fake, so she doubles down on ghost hunting

She comes up with crazy traps, finds clues and plans to unmask the 'ghosts'

Chat is also trying to follow her lead but gets mixed up in her traps or gets kidnapped by the 'ghosts' and also raids the fridges for food

The crazy plans work, the mysterious ghosts are never actually ghosts and their teamwork saves the village or wherever they are in Paris

Okay, yeah, so I might have just described Scooby Doo.

But I could totally see this happening

[sunnysideprincess]

Natasha: Tony has a thing for bad boys.

Steve: Got it.

-later-

Tony: Who's putting coffee grounds in the disposal?