#Kashmir sovereignty

[insightfultake]

How India Redefined Sovereignty: Article 370’s Legacy in Kashmir

In the grand theater of global politics, the United Nations has long been viewed as a custodian of peace and a mediator in conflicts. But in Kashmir, the abrogation of Article 370 marked the beginning of an era where India decisively turned the page on international arbitration, casting the UN into the shadows of irrelevance. For decades, the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) lingered in Srinagar, a relic of Cold War politics that time had outgrown, but it was the abrogation that delivered the final verdict: its purpose was obsolete. Expand to read more

[timetravellingkitty]

KASHMIR MASTERLIST

Background

History of Kashmir from 250 BC to 1947 [to understand Kashmir's multi religious history and how we got to 1947]

Broad timeline of events from 1947 to the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution in 2019 (BBC) [yes, BBC. hang on just this once]

Human Rights Watch report based on a visit to Indian controlled Kashmir in 1998 [has a summary, background, human rights abuses and recommendations]

Another concise summary of the issue

Sites to check out

Kashmir Action - news and readings

The Kashmiriyat - independent news site about ongoings in Kashmir

FreePressKashmir - same thing as previous

Kashmir Law and Justice Project - analysis of international law as it applies to Kashmir

Stand with Kashmir - awareness, run by diaspora Kashmiris (both Pandit and Muslim)

These two for more readings and resources on Kashmir: note that the petitions and donation links are from 2019 and also has explainers on the background (x) (x)

To read

Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora? - about women in the Kashmiri resistance movement and the 1991 mass rape of Kashmiri women in the twin villages of Kunan and Poshpora by Indian armed forces

Until My Freedom Has Come: The New Intifada in Kashmir - a compliation of writings about the lives of Kashmiris under Indian domination

Colonizing Kashmir: State Building under Indian Occupation - how Kashmir was made "integral" to the Indian state and examines state-building policies (excerpt)

Resisting Occupation in Kashmir - about the social and legal dimensions of India's occupation

On India's scapegoating of Kashmiri Pandits, both by Kashmiri Pandits (x) (x)

Of Gardens and Graves - translations of Kashmiri poems

Social media

kashiirkoor

museumofkashmir

kashmirpopart

posh_baahar

readingkashmir

standwithkashmir and their backup account standwithkashmir2 (main account is banned in India wonder why)

kashmirlawjustice

kashmirawareness

jammugenocide (awareness about the 1947 genocide abetted by Maharaja Hari Singh and the RSS)

To watch

Jashn-e-Azadi: How We Celebrate Freedom parts 1 and 2 - a documentary about the Kashmiri freedom struggle (filmed by a Kashmiri Pandit)

Paradise Lost - BBC documentary about how India and Pakistan's dispute over the valley has affected the people

Kashmir - Valley of Tears - the exhaustion with the conflict in the post nineties

In the Shade of Fallen Chinar - art as a form of Kashmiri resistance

Human rights violations (x) (x) (x) (x) (x)

Land theft and dispossession (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x)

A note: I know annoying Desis are going to see this and go "Oh but Kashmir is Pakistan's because-" and "Kashmir is an integral part of India because-". I must make my stance clear: Kashmir belongs to the Kashmiris, the natives, no matter what religion they belong to. Neither Pakistan nor India get to decide the matter of Kashmiri sovereignty. The reasons given by both parties as to why Kashmir should be a part of either nation are bullshit. The United Nations itself recognises Kashmir as a disputed region, so I will not entertain dumbfuckery. I highly encourage fellow Indians especially to take the time to go through and properly understand the violence the government enacts on Kashmiris. I've also included links to learn more about Kashmiri culture because really, what do the rest of us know about it? Culturally and linguistically Kashmir differs so much from the rest of India and Pakistan (also the amount of fetishization of Kashmiri women...yikes). This is not just a bilateral issue between these two nations over land, this actually affects the people of Kashmir. And if you're still here, thank you for reading

[33-108]

Trika Shastra

Kashmir Shaivism is a religio-philosophical creed that deals with the three fundamentals of human existence: Man, Universe and the Ultimate Principle governing the world. Outlining the key concepts of Trika system In his book Pamarthsara, Abhinavagupta describes Consciousness of man as the Atman, the core eternal witness of all that is undergoing ceaseless change in body and mind.

Since Shaivism treats Absolute Truth under the three broad principles of God, Soul and Matter, the system is known as Trika Shastra or simply Trika. It is based on the three energies of Lord Shiva, 1) Para, the subjective energy; 2) Parapara, the cognitive energy and 3) Apara, the objective energy of the Lord. It is a universal spiritual philosophy in which all aspects of life are integrated and taken in totality. The soul is said to be of the same nature as Consciousness and there is no difference either between individual soul, technically called the Pasu and the universal self called Pati, or between the world of consciousness and that of senses.

Trika philosophy aims at intelligent synthesis of all that is abiding and enduring in the six systems of Indian thought. It adopted monism from the non-dual philosophy of Vedanta, theism from the Vaishnavites, logic from the Nyaya system, discipline from the Yoga aphorisms of Patanjali and popular appeal from the Buddhists.

Yet, Trika system represents a positive and a theistic outlook in contrast to the absolute monism of Vedanta. Shiva is the Ultimate Reality endowed with sovereignty of will, omniscience and omnipotence. He is beyond everything. He is both immanent and transcendent. Time, form and space do not limit him, for He is above all mutation and change.

- Gopinath Raina

[colonelrajyavardhanrathore]

Tributes to the Border Security Force on Its Foundation Day: Col Rajyavardhan Rathore

The Border Security Force: Guardians of India’s Borders

The BSF was established in the aftermath of the 1965 war with Pakistan to secure India’s borders and prevent cross-border infiltration and smuggling. Over the years, the force has evolved into one of the largest and most respected paramilitary organizations in the world.

Key Roles of the BSF

Border Security: Safeguarding 7,416 kilometers of India’s land border with Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Internal Security: Assisting in counter-insurgency operations and disaster relief.

Global Engagements: Participating in United Nations peacekeeping missions.

The BSF’s commitment to duty goes beyond the call of guarding borders; they ensure peace and stability within and beyond the nation’s boundaries.

Colonel Rajyavardhan Rathore: A Soldier’s Tribute

As a decorated soldier and leader, Col Rajyavardhan Rathore shares a profound connection with India’s armed and paramilitary forces. On the occasion of BSF’s foundation day, his tributes resonate with deep admiration for their selfless service.

Recognizing Valor and Dedication

Colonel Rathore acknowledged the relentless dedication of BSF personnel, stating, “The BSF is not just a force; it is a family that works tirelessly, braving the harshest terrains and conditions to ensure that every Indian sleeps peacefully at night.”

Personal Connection as a Soldier

Having served in the Indian Army, Col Rathore understands the challenges of life at the border. His words reflect the camaraderie shared among servicemen, emphasizing their sacrifices and the emotional toll of being away from loved ones.

The Sacrifices of BSF Soldiers

Life at the border is not for the faint-hearted. From the icy heights of Kashmir to the scorching deserts of Rajasthan, BSF personnel operate in extreme conditions, often putting their lives on the line to uphold the nation’s security.

Challenges Faced by the BSF

Adverse Weather Conditions: Harsh climates in border areas demand exceptional resilience.

Constant Vigilance: The threat of infiltration and smuggling keeps the force on high alert.

Emotional Strain: Long separations from family and loved ones test their mental strength.

Colonel Rathore highlighted these sacrifices, urging citizens to honor their dedication by supporting their families and respecting their service.

Celebrating the Legacy of the BSF

Foundation day is not just a commemoration of the past but a celebration of the present and a promise for the future. The BSF’s achievements in maintaining border security, promoting harmony in volatile regions, and supporting disaster relief efforts showcase their diverse capabilities.

Achievements of the BSF

Successfully thwarted numerous infiltration attempts.

Played a crucial role in combating terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir.

Contributed to community-building initiatives in border villages.

Col Rathore lauded these accomplishments, calling them a testament to the BSF’s unwavering spirit.

Colonel Rathore’s Call to Action

In his tribute, Col Rathore urged the nation to remember the sacrifices of BSF personnel not just on foundation day but every day. He stressed the importance of recognizing their role in shaping a secure and prosperous India.

Promoting Awareness

Colonel Rathore emphasized the need for greater awareness about the BSF’s contributions among the younger generation. He encouraged schools and colleges to include lessons on the role of paramilitary forces in maintaining India’s sovereignty.

Conclusion: A Salute to the Heroes

The Border Security Force is more than just a protective shield — it is the heartbeat of India’s security apparatus. On its foundation day, Col Rajyavardhan Rathore’s heartfelt tributes remind us of the sacrifices and valor of these brave men and women. As India celebrates this milestone, let us pledge to honor their service, support their families, and ensure their legacy of dedication continues to inspire future generations.

[zwischenstadt]

"Some anticolonial nationalists were real nationalists, that is, they saw claims of self-determination within their imagined community of a nation as ‘separatist’, ‘secessionist’, ‘ethnonationalist insurgencies’ or ‘terrorism’. Such framings, rife in Indian discourses on Kashmir, are ahistorical and dehumanising. When we move beyond seeing these regions from the perspective of the dominant nation-state, we come to see how they are places with their own histories, imaginaries and political aspirations – some of which may reinscribe the nation, while others seek to move beyond it through understandings of other forms of sovereignty.

In popular and even scholarly discourses, colonialism is often seen as happening ‘overseas’ – from Europe to somewhere in the Global South. Many people see colonialism as something that we are past temporally, despite acknowledgement of its ongoing legacies. Forms of colonialism within the Global South remain more difficult for many to see because many of these regions are geographically contiguous to one another and, thus, seen as having some form of cultural or racial unity that would form a nation. This results in what Goldie Osuri calls a ‘structural concealment of the relationship between postcolonial nation-states and their [own colonies],’ as well as the concealment of ‘the manner in which postcolonial nationalism is also an expansionist project.’ Contemporary colonies – like Kashmir, Western Sahara, Puerto Rico, Palestine, East Turkestan, among others – show the porous boundary between colonialism and postcolonialism, raising some difficult questions about the current global order."

Hafsa Kanjwal, "Colonies of Former Colonies" in Aeon

[beardedmrbean]

As an armed rebellion against Indian rule raged in Kashmir through the 1990s and 2000s, Jamaat-e-Islami, an influential socio-religious group, called for a boycott whenever an election was held, claiming the exercise was aimed at legitimising what it would describe as New Delhi’s occupation of the Himalayan region, which is also claimed in part or full by Pakistan and China.

But as Kashmir votes in the first regional election in a decade starting on Tuesday, the Jamaat has itself entered the political fray, backing at least 10 candidates in the election. It is a remarkable turnaround for a group that remains banned under India’s anti-terror laws and was once regarded as the mothership of the militant Hizbul Mujahideen.

After Narendra Modi’s government altered India’s constitution in 2019 to do away with the symbolic autonomy of the administrative region of Jammu and Kashmir, it cracked down hard on the separatist movement in the region, jailing thousands of people. The Jamaat, having long been at the vanguard of the movement, was a prime target. Schools associated with the group were ordered shut and the properties of many members were seized in an attempt to curtail its reach and operational capabilities.

As recently as February, the Indian government said that the Jamaat was “continuing to be involved in fomenting terrorism and anti-India propaganda for fuelling secessionism in Jammu and Kashmir, which is prejudicial to the sovereignty, security and integrity of India”.

This is what makes the Jamaat’s participation in the election perplexing, and even experts in the region are divided over what it means. Noor Baba, a renowned Kashmiri political scientist, says it could be a tactical move on the part of a minority within the movement – contesting the election as independents in the hope of “protection or rehabilitating themselves after the suffering they have endured”.

The decision to join the fray, he suggests, may not have involved the group’s jailed leadership. As a result of internal divisions in the past, Prof Baba says, the Jamaat has suffered at the hands of both the Indian authorities as well as the militants. Similar divisions may have cracked open again.

“There are many questions,” he tells The Independent. “Is the top leadership, which is in jail, on board with this or is it not?”

Another theory is that the decision stems from the Jamaat’s desire to have the anti-terror ban lifted. There have been reports about conversations between the Jamaat and intermediaries of the Indian government such as Altaf Bukhari, head of a local political party.

Ahead of this election, Omar Abdullah, the former chief minister of the former state, had urged the Narendra Modi government to lift the ban on the Jamaat to enable its participation in the assembly election. Mehbooba Mufti, another former chief minister and president of the People’s Democratic Party, said she would be “happy” to see the Jamaat return to the electoral arena.

Indian political analyst Apoorvanand Jha, however, sees a more sinister play at work. He says fielding independent candidates is part of a broader strategy of Modi’s BJP to weaken mainstream political parties such as the National Conference and the Congress and reap the dividend.

“The BJP’s aim is to install a government headed by a Hindu chief minister. That can be achieved by securing as many seats as possible in the Jammu region and fielding as many independents as possible in the valley [of Kashmir], making them win and then taking their support to form the government,” he tells The Independent.

The BJP is seeking to control Kashmir politically by creating chaos, he says. “To achieve that,” he adds, “the BJP can do anything. It can go to any extent, play any game, collaborate with the radicals, collaborate with separatists.”

The Independent has contacted the BJP for comment.

India has long held up Kashmir, its only majority Muslim territory, as a symbol of its secularism. But when the BJP government revoked its autonomy, Kashmiris accused the Hindu nationalist party of trying to change its religious demographic by settling Indians from elsewhere in the region.

Mr Jha says the BJP wants to win the election in order to show its core Hindu base that “see, this is a Muslim-populated area which we have now annexed”.

The candidates backed by the Jamaat maintain that their election participation is about local issues.

“Ideologies work in time and space. We have to be accommodative and flexible,” Talat Majeed, who is contesting the Pulwama constituency, told reporters recently.

Another candidate, Sayar Ahmad Reshi, says their participation in the election is necessary to fill a political vacuum created by regional parties such as the National Conference and the People’s Democratic Party.

The Jamaat’s participation seems to have enthused some pro-India factions in Kashmir. “This election is unique in recent times because the banned Jamaat-e-Islami is openly backing and campaigning for independent candidates owing allegiance to it,” Mr Abdullah said in an interview with the Hindustan Times. “This is a huge change from previous elections. Otherwise, ever since I have seen politics here from 1996 onwards, the Jamaat has been at the forefront of trying to stop people from voting.”

Ali Mohammad Watali, a former police chief of Kashmir, isn’t as enthused. The Jamaat was “pro-Pakistan and pro-terrorism”, he was quoted as saying by Frontline magazine. “Now they have changed their stance suddenly. It looks like this is being done by the agencies so that the BJP can form a government here with the help of new political fronts, including the Jamaat-e-Islami.”

“Agencies” is a catch-all term used in Kashmir for the intelligence, security and surveillance apparatus of the Indian state.

The Jamaat candidates have indicated their willingness to form alliances, before or after the election, with any party that works to “restore dignity to the people of Jammu and Kashmir”.

Prof Saddiq Wahid, a senior visiting fellow at the Centre for Policy Research think tank in New Delhi, tells The Independent the BJP’s actions in Jammu and Kashmir since the revocation of its autonomy have been aimed at creating confusion and chaos. “How is Jamaat suddenly into the picture?” he asks.

He fears that the political landscape of Kashmir is being manipulated to dilute local representation and prevent self-governance.

“They do not want the people of Jammu and Kashmir to have a government that will allow them to govern themselves,” he says, referring to the Indian government.

The fundamental question, though, is whether people will trust the candidates backed by the Jamaat, Prof Baba points out. “How many people will vote for them, support them?”

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 11th Dec. The Indian National Congress, once synonymous with Bharat’s struggle for independence, finds itself mired in controversy again as allegations of foreign influence cast a shadow over its operations. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has launched a scathing attack, alleging the Congress’s links to foreign powers and organizations that have a history of interfering in stable democracies and pushing agendas that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty. Central to this latest uproar is the association between the Congress party, its leaders, and the George Soros Foundation—a connection that has raised questions about foreign funding in Bharatiya politics and its implications for national security. On December 8, the BJP took to social media to accuse Sonia Gandhi, the former Congress President, of having ties to George Soros, a controversial Hungarian-American billionaire notorious for his alleged role in destabilizing democracies. The BJP’s allegations center on Gandhi’s role as co-president of the Forum of Democratic Leaders in Asia-Pacific (FDL-AP), an organization reportedly financed by Soros’s foundation. The BJP claims FDL-AP has historically supported the idea of Kashmir as an independent entity, a position that directly undermines Bharat’s territorial integrity. Adding fuel to the fire, the BJP also alleged that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), chaired by Sonia Gandhi, received funds from the George Soros Foundation. These claims were supported by images of Salil Shetty, Vice President of the Soros-funded Open Society Foundation, participating in Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Yatra—a moment BJP argued reflected Congress’s closeness to Soros-linked entities. The ruling party also cited Shashi Tharoor’s public acknowledgment of Soros as an “old friend” as further evidence of deep-rooted connections. The controversy deepened with revelations about the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an investigative body known for its exposés on corporate and political corruption. The BJP pointed to a live telecast of Rahul Gandhi’s press conference on the Adani Group by OCCRP, implying a coordinated effort to tarnish Bharatiya businesses and institutions. These claims gained momentum following a report by the French newspaper Mediapart, which revealed that OCCRP receives nearly half its funding from U.S. government agencies such as the Department of State and USAID. According to the investigative report, OCCRP’s structural dependence on U.S. institutions undermines its claims of being an independent organization. The allegations against Congress do not stop at Soros or U.S.-linked organizations. The BJP has also highlighted Congress’s connections with China, particularly during its tenure in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. In 2008, Congress signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Communist Party of China (CPC), paving the way for high-level exchanges and consultations on regional and international issues. This agreement resurfaced as a contentious issue during the 2017 Doklam standoff, when Rahul Gandhi was photographed meeting Chinese officials at a time of heightened tensions between Bharat and China. Further revelations about the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation receiving over ₹1 crore from the Chinese government between 2006 and 2020 have only added to the suspicions surrounding Congress’s foreign connections. These allegations have ignited fierce debate across Bharat, with the BJP accusing Congress of compromising national interests for political and financial gains. According to the BJP, the Congress’s ties to foreign organizations reflect a dangerous trend of undermining Bharatiya sovereignty for ideological and monetary gains. On the other hand, Congress leaders have dismissed these allegations as baseless and politically motivated, claiming that the BJP is attempting to divert attention from pressing governance failures. At the heart of

this controversy lies a broader question about the role of foreign funding and influence in Bharatiya politics. While no political party is entirely free of external interactions, the claims against Congress raise legitimate concerns about the extent to which foreign entities, particularly those with questionable agendas, can sway domestic political narratives. George Soros, for instance, is a polarizing figure globally, with critics accusing him of destabilizing democracies under the guise of promoting liberal values. His foundation’s reported involvement in supporting narratives that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty, such as treating Kashmir as an independent entity, has sparked fears about foreign meddling in Bharat’s internal affairs. The Congress’s alleged links with China further complicate its position, especially at a time when Bharat-China relations remain fraught. The MoU with the Communist Party of China and financial contributions from Chinese entities to the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation suggest a level of engagement that raises red flags. Critics argue that such ties undermine Bharat’s strategic posture and compromise its ability to address Chinese aggression decisively. In conclusion, the allegations against Congress underscore the need for greater transparency and accountability in political funding and foreign associations. While the BJP’s accusations may serve its immediate political agenda, they also point to a larger issue of ensuring that Bharatiya political parties remain insulated from external influences that could jeopardize national interests. For Congress, this controversy represents yet another challenge to its credibility at a time when the party is striving to revive its political fortunes. Without addressing these allegations convincingly, the Congress risks alienating a public increasingly wary of foreign interference in Bharat’s democratic processes. In the end, safeguarding Bharat’s sovereignty must remain a non-negotiable priority for all political actors, regardless of ideological differences.   The post Congress Under Fire: Alleged Ties to George Soros and China Spark Fierce Debate appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 11th Dec. The Indian National Congress, once synonymous with Bharat’s struggle for independence, finds itself mired in controversy again as allegations of foreign influence cast a shadow over its operations. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has launched a scathing attack, alleging the Congress’s links to foreign powers and organizations that have a history of interfering in stable democracies and pushing agendas that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty. Central to this latest uproar is the association between the Congress party, its leaders, and the George Soros Foundation—a connection that has raised questions about foreign funding in Bharatiya politics and its implications for national security. On December 8, the BJP took to social media to accuse Sonia Gandhi, the former Congress President, of having ties to George Soros, a controversial Hungarian-American billionaire notorious for his alleged role in destabilizing democracies. The BJP’s allegations center on Gandhi’s role as co-president of the Forum of Democratic Leaders in Asia-Pacific (FDL-AP), an organization reportedly financed by Soros’s foundation. The BJP claims FDL-AP has historically supported the idea of Kashmir as an independent entity, a position that directly undermines Bharat’s territorial integrity. Adding fuel to the fire, the BJP also alleged that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), chaired by Sonia Gandhi, received funds from the George Soros Foundation. These claims were supported by images of Salil Shetty, Vice President of the Soros-funded Open Society Foundation, participating in Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Yatra—a moment BJP argued reflected Congress’s closeness to Soros-linked entities. The ruling party also cited Shashi Tharoor’s public acknowledgment of Soros as an “old friend” as further evidence of deep-rooted connections. The controversy deepened with revelations about the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an investigative body known for its exposés on corporate and political corruption. The BJP pointed to a live telecast of Rahul Gandhi’s press conference on the Adani Group by OCCRP, implying a coordinated effort to tarnish Bharatiya businesses and institutions. These claims gained momentum following a report by the French newspaper Mediapart, which revealed that OCCRP receives nearly half its funding from U.S. government agencies such as the Department of State and USAID. According to the investigative report, OCCRP’s structural dependence on U.S. institutions undermines its claims of being an independent organization. The allegations against Congress do not stop at Soros or U.S.-linked organizations. The BJP has also highlighted Congress’s connections with China, particularly during its tenure in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. In 2008, Congress signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Communist Party of China (CPC), paving the way for high-level exchanges and consultations on regional and international issues. This agreement resurfaced as a contentious issue during the 2017 Doklam standoff, when Rahul Gandhi was photographed meeting Chinese officials at a time of heightened tensions between Bharat and China. Further revelations about the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation receiving over ₹1 crore from the Chinese government between 2006 and 2020 have only added to the suspicions surrounding Congress’s foreign connections. These allegations have ignited fierce debate across Bharat, with the BJP accusing Congress of compromising national interests for political and financial gains. According to the BJP, the Congress’s ties to foreign organizations reflect a dangerous trend of undermining Bharatiya sovereignty for ideological and monetary gains. On the other hand, Congress leaders have dismissed these allegations as baseless and politically motivated, claiming that the BJP is attempting to divert attention from pressing governance failures. At the heart of

this controversy lies a broader question about the role of foreign funding and influence in Bharatiya politics. While no political party is entirely free of external interactions, the claims against Congress raise legitimate concerns about the extent to which foreign entities, particularly those with questionable agendas, can sway domestic political narratives. George Soros, for instance, is a polarizing figure globally, with critics accusing him of destabilizing democracies under the guise of promoting liberal values. His foundation’s reported involvement in supporting narratives that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty, such as treating Kashmir as an independent entity, has sparked fears about foreign meddling in Bharat’s internal affairs. The Congress’s alleged links with China further complicate its position, especially at a time when Bharat-China relations remain fraught. The MoU with the Communist Party of China and financial contributions from Chinese entities to the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation suggest a level of engagement that raises red flags. Critics argue that such ties undermine Bharat’s strategic posture and compromise its ability to address Chinese aggression decisively. In conclusion, the allegations against Congress underscore the need for greater transparency and accountability in political funding and foreign associations. While the BJP’s accusations may serve its immediate political agenda, they also point to a larger issue of ensuring that Bharatiya political parties remain insulated from external influences that could jeopardize national interests. For Congress, this controversy represents yet another challenge to its credibility at a time when the party is striving to revive its political fortunes. Without addressing these allegations convincingly, the Congress risks alienating a public increasingly wary of foreign interference in Bharat’s democratic processes. In the end, safeguarding Bharat’s sovereignty must remain a non-negotiable priority for all political actors, regardless of ideological differences.   The post Congress Under Fire: Alleged Ties to George Soros and China Spark Fierce Debate appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[ebelal56-blog]

Cuba's SMALL WONDER Story of Resilience

Cuba. A small island nation that has faced decades of adversity, yet stands tall, resilient against the backdrop of U.S. aggression. Now, let’s take a moment to reflect on what Cuba teaches us, not just about survival, but about the complex dance of international relations. It’s fascinating, isn’t it? Here’s a country that, despite being surrounded by a giant with a long history of hostility, has managed to carve out its own identity, maintain its sovereignty, and foster a sense of unity among its people. This resilience is something that could serve as a lesson for India, especially when we look at its interactions with its neighbors. Now, India is a vast nation, rich in culture and diversity, yet its relationships with neighboring countries often seem fraught with tension. Take Pakistan, for instance. The history here is marred by conflict and mistrust, especially over Kashmir. It’s a relationship that has seen numerous attempts at dialogue, but these efforts often collapse under the weight of terrorism and border disputes. The question arises: how can a country as influential as India, with its immense resources and strategic position, find a way to foster a more amicable relationship with its neighbors? Then there’s China. A complex relationship characterized by both cooperation and rivalry. On one hand, we see trade flourishing, yet on the other, we have border disputes that can escalate into serious confrontations. It’s a tightrope walk, and India must learn to navigate these waters with a level of finesse that emphasizes diplomacy over hostility. And what about Bangladesh? Here, we find a cultural kinship that should ideally foster a strong bond. Yet, issues surrounding migration and border management have at times strained this relationship. It’s a reminder that shared history isn’t always enough to overcome the challenges posed by political realities. Let’s not forget Nepal. A nation that shares so much with India in terms of culture and geography, yet tensions occasionally flare over border disputes and perceived interference in internal matters. It’s a delicate balance, and one that requires India to approach its neighbors with a sense of respect and understanding. Sri Lanka presents another interesting case. India has been a significant ally, providing military and economic support, yet the complexities of the Tamil issue have caused friction. This is where the lessons from Cuba become pertinent. Cuba has maintained its sovereignty and identity despite external pressures. India, too, must strive to respect the identities and aspirations of its neighbors, recognizing that cooperation doesn’t mean domination. And while Bhutan remains a close ally, with strong ties in defense and trade, the relationships with Myanmar and the Maldives are more complicated. In Myanmar, India engages for strategic reasons, yet the political turmoil there presents challenges that require careful navigation. The Maldives, with its shifting political landscape, demands adaptability and a commitment to mutual respect. So, what can India learn from Cuba? It’s about resilience, yes, but it’s also about respect. It’s about recognizing that every nation has its own narrative, its own struggles, and its own aspirations. By approaching its neighbors with a sense of empathy and a willingness to listen, India can foster a sense of trust that is essential for regional stability. Cuba, despite its challenges, stands as a testament to the strength of a nation that refuses to bow down. India, with its rich history and potential, must take a page from this book. It’s time to rethink strategies, to embrace cooperation over conflict, and to build relationships that reflect a commitment to peace and mutual growth. After all, in the intricate web of international relations, resilience is not just about enduring; it’s about thriving together.

[voiceofbangus]

Mir Junaid alleges Sheikh Rashid, MP, a National Threat and Traitor Involved in Terror Funding

Langate, Oct 12: Mir Junaid, who contested assembly elections from Langate in a statement issued here said that this evening, he had the honor of meeting with the Honorable Lieutenant Governor, Shri Manoj Sinha, just before his departure for New Delhi.

He said that he will soon be sharing transformative news for the people of Langate—news that will come directly from him, without deception, and with the pure intention of uplifting the region. This stands in stark contrast to the web of lies being spread by Sheikh Rashid, whose recent press release and Facebook post are nothing but fabrications, said Mir in a statement issued here.

He added that Sheikh Rashid, a Member of Parliament who is chargesheeted by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for terror funding, has been begging for mercy behind closed doors, not for the people of Jammu and Kashmir, but for himself. At Raj Bhavan, he was not advocating for the development of North Kashmir or the welfare of the humble citizens he claims to represent. Instead, he was pleading for his own escape from justice, trying to evade the terror funding charges that expose him as a traitor and a threat to national security.

Mir further added that the man, who claims to speak for Jammu and Kashmir, is only speaking the language of Pakistan. His efforts are designed to destabilize India and push our youth into the arms of violence. Let me be clear: the resolution of the Kashmir issue is not India’s problem; it is Pakistan’s. Sheikh Rashid is actively working to keep alive issues that were buried on August 5, 2019, when nearly 370 Honorable Parliamentarians of India voted to abrogate Article 370 and 35A, finally declaring that these provisions were deadwood. Following this, the Honorable Supreme Court of India has provided robust affirmation of our constitutional sovereignty and integrity, confirming that matters like independence, referendum, plebiscite, and self-rule are non-existent and null and void.

Mir added that Sheikh Rashid, however, refuses to accept this reality. He is not a leader; he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, pushing a narrative that is not only false but dangerous. His lies about plebiscites and his so-called “solution” for Kashmir are nothing more than an attempt to remain politically relevant while being a national threat. For 15 years, he deceived the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and now, by legitimizing dangerous issues, he is pushing the youth towards violence and destruction for his own political gain.

He in a statement further added that the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have always maintained that national interest will not be compromised for political interests. So I must ask—what is happening in the case of Sheikh Rashid? Aren’t you compromising national interest by allowing this man, who is chargesheeted for terror funding, to continue his dangerous activities? Please understand, you have miserably failed in experimenting with Sheikh Rashid in Kashmir. He is legitimizing issues that are not only dangerous for the youth of Jammu and Kashmir but are also a direct threat to the security of our nation.

I call upon the Ministry of Home Affairs to take immediate cognizance of this grave situation. Sheikh Rashid is not just a liar—he is a national threat, and his place is not in Parliament, but in Tihar Jail. The Kashmir Police must launch an immediate investigation into his actions. He has betrayed the people of Jammu and Kashmir, the noble people of North Kashmir, and most importantly, he has betrayed the nation. His actions amount to sedition and treason, and it is time for the Government of India to act decisively.

The BJP must remember its own words. National interest must never be compromised for political interest. Sheikh Rashid’s continuous presence in public life is a direct contradiction of this principle. His lies, manipulations, and dangerous narratives are putting the youth of Jammu and Kashmir at risk and threatening the peace and stability of India. The Government of India, and specifically the BJP, must reflect on this and think of the larger interest of the nation.

Sheikh Rashid is no longer just a political figure—he is a legitimizer of dangerous and seditious ideas. His presence is poisoning the minds of our youth, and the consequences are too grave to ignore. It is time to end this experiment, recognize him for the threat he truly is, and ensure that justice is served before more lives are lost.

[guldaastan]

this is making me so mad. kashmiris cannot express themselves without consequences. they cannot express solidarity with victims of a genocide neither can they show anger at their treatment by the hands of the indian government.

in tihar jail, the indian government has kept kashmiri political prisoners in cells with a single solitary fan amidst a heatwave where the temperature reached 52°C (126°F). their applications to buy air coolers were turned down by the state (because we have money to build bridges that collapse in the span of a week but not enough to get air coolers).

female political prisoners have been denied medicine.

most of these political prisoners were arrested for demanding more regional autonomy for kashmir.

this law is so fucked up as 97.2% people arrested under UAPA are acquitted. many trials don't start for years until after the accused is arrested.

since the start of the third term of the NDA government, nine terror attacks have taken place in kashmir. in 38 days.

the indian army has been accused of using the internationally banned white phosphorus (which Israel has used in gaza and lebanon) in kashmir. it's not the first time this has happened. fyi, israel sells arms to india and vice-versa.

kashmir has registered the highest number of internet restrictions internationally. it has also faced the world's longest internet shutdown (18 months). kashmir's freedom of speech is under threat. they cannot freely say that they are under military occupation because that's considered a against india's sovereignty. it's literally the most militarised zone in the world.

all this is happening in the 'world's largest democracy'.

the people of kashmir lead a muharram procession in srinagar and expressed solidarity with the people of palestine.

pc

[rgmuskan]

Amit Shah’s Bold Stance: No Room for Autonomy in Jammu and Kashmir Under BJP’s Vision - Nishant Verma

Amit Shah’s recent statements during his address in Jammu and Kashmir, as reported in the article, highlight the BJP’s firm stance on issues related to the autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir. Shah made it abundantly clear that under the Modi government, no entity or force can even contemplate the notion of J&K’s autonomy. This reflects the party’s unwavering commitment to the full integration of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union and their rejection of any notion that challenges India’s sovereignty over the region. To Read more about the Latest News, entrepreneurship, digital marketing, startups and more Visit Nishant Verma Website.

[cyndaquillt]

"No bro, we can't give you Gorkhaland bro. Best we can do is give you a whole regiment in the army and recruit you in like Kashmir so that neither you nor they get sovereignty. We cool bro? You're getting posted to Jannat on earth bro. Literally Jannat on earth bro!"

[werindialive]

MEA rejects the joint statement of Pakistan and China; calls it ‘unwarranted’

On Thursday, the Ministry of External Affairs said that the mention of Jammu & Kashmir in the joint statement released by Pakistan and China is ‘unwarranted’.

The statement issued by the MEA read, “We have noted unwarranted references to the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir in the joint statement between China and Pakistan of 07 June 2024.” It further stated, “We categorically reject such references. Our position on the issue is consistent and well-known to the concerned parties.”

The ministry reiterated that Jammu & Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh have always been a part of India and will remain so.

“The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain integral and inalienable parts of India. No other country has the locus standi to comment on the same,” MEA pointed out.

The ministry also highlighted the joint statement made by Pakistan & China on June 7th and said that some of the developmental works mentioned in the statement under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor are under India's sovereign territory that is under the forcible or illegal occupancy of Pakistan.

“The same joint statement also mentions activities and projects under the so-called China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), some of which are in India's sovereign territory under forcible and illegal occupation by Pakistan,” it said.

"We resolutely oppose and reject any moves by other countries to reinforce or legitimize Pakistan's illegal occupation of these territories, impinging on India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity," the statement added.

On June 7th, China & Pakistan released a joint statement where Pakistan said that it has updated China on the latest developments in Jammu & Kashmir. “The Chinese side reiterated that the Jammu and Kashmir dispute is left over from history, and should be properly and peacefully resolved in accordance with the UN Charter, relevant UN Security Council resolutions, and bilateral agreements,” the joint statement mentioned.

For more latest news India in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter.

[nismunc-ipc]

India, China and Denmark call for Kashmir’s Independence

by Yonhap News Reporter

UNSC: New York, March. 2 (Yonhap) – India, China, and Denmark Delegates are pushing to establish a new shared provisional government of Kashmir, where different countries will have control over the Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh regions along the India-China border over periods of time. 

As one of the largest undisputed borders between the two countries, Aksai Chin: a mountainous region, serves as an integral safeguard and deterrent in China’s favor to pose a threat to India’s Sovereignty. Arunachal Pradesh, a state in North-East India, has a strategic geographical location, heritage sites, as well as a variety of natural resources such as mineral oils and gas. Therefore, the ownership of this area by any one nation would lead to unfair advantages over the other. 

“Kashmir may become an independent state” The Delegate of Denmark states in an interview with a reporter from Yonhap News. The control over Kashmir is currently being debated within the UNSC council and is unconfirmed. 

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 13th November. In a searing critique of the Congress-led Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance in Maharashtra, Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently branded the coalition of Congress, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), and Shiv Sena as the ultimate “khiladi” (player) in corruption and inefficiency. Addressing a public gathering in Chimur, Maharashtra, Modi accused the MVA of stifling the state’s development and deliberately obstructing progress for political gain. With Maharashtra’s state assembly polls nearing, Modi’s message resonates as a call to voters to scrutinize the MVA’s track record and consider the larger implications of its governance. The Allegations: Corruption and Stalled Development Prime Minister Modi did not hold back in his criticism, asserting that Maharashtra’s potential has been systematically undermined by the MVA, which he accused of prioritizing political interests over the state’s welfare. According to Modi, the MVA has delayed crucial development projects, including much-needed rail connectivity, which local communities have awaited for decades. Modi’s assertion is that Congress and its allies in the MVA possess a “specialization” in thwarting growth, labeling them “experts” in creating bureaucratic and political roadblocks. This strong indictment of the MVA’s governance record is aimed at portraying the coalition as an impediment to Maharashtra’s development and progress. The Tribal Community and Modi’s Message of Unity A significant aspect of Modi’s speech was his critique of the Congress’s alleged intent to divide Bharat’s tribal communities for political leverage. As a substantial part of Maharashtra’s demographic fabric, the tribal population has traditionally sought unity to protect their cultural heritage and political interests. Modi argued that Congress’s promotion of a caste-based census among tribal communities would create internal divisions, weakening their collective power and diluting their identity. He accused the Congress of trying to foster divisions within the tribal community to exploit this disunity politically. This, Modi claimed, was an insidious tactic that Congress has perfected over the years, with damaging consequences for social cohesion and progress. Article 370: The Question of Kashmir and Congress’s Legacy The abolition of Article 370, a law granting special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir, has been a hallmark of Modi’s administration, which he sees as a step toward full national integration. During his address, Modi connected the Congress with a legacy of fostering separatist tendencies in Jammu and Kashmir. According to him, Congress’s historical handling of Article 370 and Kashmir’s volatile politics reflects a tendency to overlook national unity for political gains. Modi reminded voters of his government’s decisive action to dissolve Article 370, framing it as a necessary intervention that Congress and its allies failed to undertake. This emphasis on unity underscores Modi’s assertion that his government prioritizes Bharat’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, unlike Congress, which he accuses of enabling violence and division. Criticism of the Gandhi Family: Accusations of Entitlement and Elitism Another recurring theme in Modi’s criticism of the Congress-led MVA was directed specifically at the Gandhi family. He accused the Gandhis of holding an elitist view, claiming they believe themselves entitled to govern Bharat due to their lineage. This alleged sense of entitlement, Modi argued, has influenced Congress’s policies over the decades, obstructing social mobility for Dalits, backward classes, and Adivasis. By highlighting Congress’s opposition to reservations, Modi presented the BJP as the party truly committed to the advancement of marginalized communities. According to Modi, the Congress has a history of resistance to progressive policies that could empower disadvantaged groups, reinforcing his claim that Congress sees itself as born to rule rather than to serve.

Congress’s Historic Stance on Reservations: A Hindrance to Social Equity? Modi recalled instances where Congress allegedly resisted reservation policies, a topic that remains a sensitive and polarizing issue in Bharatiya society. Specifically, he cited the 1980s, when the Congress, led by Rajiv Gandhi, reportedly questioned the constitutionality and fairness of reservations for Dalits, backward classes, and tribal communities. Modi’s critique positions Congress as a barrier to social justice for these groups, contrasting this stance with the BJP’s support for affirmative action as a tool for equity. This argument forms part of Modi’s larger claim that Congress has consistently adopted elitist policies that marginalize disadvantaged communities. Developmental Politics and the Role of the MVA in Maharashtra’s Growth Modi’s criticism of MVA’s governance record in Maharashtra strikes at the heart of an ongoing debate over developmental politics in the state. The MVA has been accused by the BJP of neglecting infrastructure, healthcare, and education initiatives, crucial sectors that drive growth. Modi’s portrayal of the MVA as a coalition driven by short-term political calculations, rather than long-term developmental vision, is intended to appeal to voters who have become disillusioned with the state’s sluggish progress. Highlighting stalled rail projects, Modi underscored the BJP’s commitment to connecting remote areas and expanding economic opportunities, suggesting that the MVA’s governance model prioritizes political gamesmanship over tangible benefits for citizens. MVA’s Response and the Broader Political Implications Unsurprisingly, the MVA has pushed back against Modi’s claims, with leaders from Congress, NCP, and Shiv Sena defending their record and accusing Modi of using divisive rhetoric. The opposition alliance argues that the BJP’s central government has often sidelined Maharashtra, limiting the state’s access to crucial resources and funding. In response to Modi’s allegations, MVA leaders have framed the BJP’s governance as exclusionary and favoring certain communities at the expense of others. This counter-narrative aims to draw attention to what MVA leaders see as the BJP’s centralizing tendencies and to deflect criticism by questioning the BJP’s commitment to federalism and state autonomy. The Stakes in the Upcoming Maharashtra Assembly Elections With Maharashtra’s assembly polls fast approaching, Modi’s speech serves as a call to action for voters, encouraging them to consider the impact of the MVA’s governance on their lives. The elections, scheduled for November 20, have become a referendum on the contrasting approaches of the BJP-led Mahayuti alliance and the MVA coalition. Modi’s assertion that the BJP will retain power with a significant majority underscores the party’s confidence in its developmental record and its ability to secure the trust of Maharashtra’s voters. By positioning the BJP as the champion of both national unity and local development, Modi is appealing to voters who seek stability, growth, and a clear path forward. Conclusion: A Clash of Ideologies and Visions for Maharashtra Prime Minister Modi’s sharp critique of the Congress-led MVA in Maharashtra reflects a broader ideological conflict that goes beyond Maharashtra’s borders. His accusations of corruption, divisive politics, and developmental stagnation are aimed at exposing what he claims are fundamental flaws in the MVA’s governance model. Modi’s rhetoric underscores the BJP’s vision of a united, development-driven Bharat, contrasting sharply with what he portrays as Congress’s fragmented and self-serving approach. This battle for Maharashtra’s future is a microcosm of a larger national debate on governance, unity, and social justice. The BJP’s promise to empower marginalized communities, preserve national unity, and accelerate development stands in stark opposition to the MVA’s governance style, which Modi depicts as outdated and mired in corruption.

For Maharashtra’s voters, the upcoming elections are an opportunity to choose between these competing visions—either endorsing the MVA’s coalition model or embracing the BJP’s promise of robust, inclusive development. Ultimately, this electoral decision will shape Maharashtra’s trajectory and set a precedent for how Bharat navigates its path of development in a diverse and complex political landscape.   The post Modi Slams Congress-Led MVA as ‘Biggest Player in Corruption’ and Obstacle to Maharashtra’s Development appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link