Yea I did it. I got the Henry Wu lines I could find from JWE1 + his DLC into a compilation.
Literally just him being petty with the Security and Science division, he doesn't care much for the Entertainment side of things.
I wanted to add captions on the video to make up for the blurriness. But apparently I’d have to download an entirely different app to do that. Which I can’t currently, maybe when I’m done moving I’ll fix it…
(I apologize for the quality and especially the drop in quality during the Tacano research facility dialogue. The only good no commentary lets play that actually got to it, had the aspect ratio so wide it made the dialogue boxes small 😔)
14 notes
·
View notes
normalize your villains. writing wise. i think everyone knows villain behavior irl would get you a ticket straight to the highest security prison out there. but this is about building a fictional world. for context, i've recently been on a rewatch for the show once upon a time and this time, i've tried to stay impartial to the characters storylines. the villains seems irredemable in the first season and frankly, i'm disappointed that this changes. hear me out !!!!!
my version of wednesday addams is for the most part chaotic neutral. wherever the current sails, she'll follow. sure, wednesday has the potential to grow and have (somewhat) healthy relationships in her life, but at the end of the day, she's not a hero. she's not even the anti-hero. sometimes it plays out like that and she might look the part, but she's not good goddammit.
for the crimes that she've committed? guilty as charged. for all the people she had hurt? guilty as charged. for all the misery she'll cause others? you guessed it, guilty as fucking charged. i'm not going to water her down.
in my mind, the addamses were always the outliers, but with the bestest of intentions. morticia and gomez welcomed vile strangers into their homes and tried their very best to make them feel comfortable in their home. they have a skewed perception for the world, something that's unusual, morbid, downright grotesque. edgar allan poe, which netflix glorified and here i am doing a shoutout to train my beloved, would tremble had he known of the addamses. morticia and gomez are kind, in their way. but you know who never really was?
their kids. in the comics (both by the og author and some others icr the author, but more closer to our time), pugsley was the devil incarnate. he showed no remorse, he was clearly thrilled by the suffering he caused others. but i suppose the directors changed the storyline and made wednesday the brand new puglsey in the 90s movies. she showed no emotion, she was a okay with murdering her own, even if she knew as luck as it, their younger brother pubert would live. this time around, wednesday was the devil incarnate.
and i agree with the canon, she can be incredibly intelligent and even more ruthless than she is intelligent. but one thing i've noticed is that, she notices her parents being taken for granted. she is aware that others will use morticia and gomez's kindness against them. sure, they can take it, that's their thing after all. but wednesday noticed everything since she was a kid and she remembers.
and guess what?
just because someone went through hell and back (even if said hell is not the worst that could happen), that doesn't mean someone will come out kind and good. wednesday will forever doubt anyone in her life and she will push them away, just as she'll try to give them the world. but no matter the good she does, at the end of the day, she is the villain. it's not the addams family, it's just the kids and i say that because pugsley and pubert have the same rights as wednesday does.
at the end of the day, being evil after witnessing evil is okay. fiction wise, i feel like reminding. some characters are irredemable. just because they do good things sometimes that doesn't make them good. just like doing bad things sometimes doesn't make them bad. but here's the catch with the addamses. they always, always own up who they are. wednesday no exception to the rule.
wednesday, the villain, can do good things. she can save your muse, she can enjoy your muse's company, she can love your muse. but all of this, all the good things do come from a villain. did she deserve the awful treatment she and her family got in canon? of course not, that we can all agree on. but it doesn't matter what happened, what matters is what choices they make afterward. wednesday will always choose herself. wednesday doesn't pick good, she willingly chooses evil.
sure, a villain is capable of love. a villain is capable of both good and bad. but look at how it always ends. wednesday is a villain and she will suffer, your muse too if you dare to come too close. it's not fair, i know. but this is just my theory, vero's theory. and, you may expect it by now,
please, normalize your villains.
10 notes
·
View notes
i just know there will be people going crazy because they think the person in front is shanks
and until proven otherwise i’m chosing to believe this is a relative of shanks since we know from film red that shanks’ family seems to be well known (can’t remember if it was confirmed that they were celestial dragons or not but shanks got adopted by roger after god valley so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)
or that person has nothing to do with shanks and it’s just oda going wild with his silhouettes
also i’m obsessed with those swirls that look like a devil fruit pattern
20 notes
·
View notes
Okay I've read the main body of SVSSS. I think it's really good as a meta parody and gives some interesting insight into MXTX's mind- I think some of the criticism of her work is unfair and this book is a pretty good example in parts (the running commentary about misogyny in stallion novels is a lot more unambiguous than her accurately depicting misogyny in others wirks like MDZS, though I don't understand why the latter gets read as an indication of her as a person).
However I don't think it works well as a romance story. There are main two problems; one,that while all of MXTX's main characters are people that have gone through the wringer and lashed out on others because of it, sometimes in really grusome and reprehensible ways, we get to see who they are not just before it goes to shit, but after they've acted in a such a way and either by intentional choice or just the passing of time, behave in a kinder and more upright manner. SVSSS's main story ends right after LBH isn't being an antagonistic force driven to the pits. Additionally, LBH is (understandably) a very misanthropic character which makes the way you'd show him learning how to be a person not driven by grief, fear, and anger different.
The other point is SY/SQQ's internalized homophobia is handled in a way that distracts somewhat from his feelings for LBH, and this combines with a lot of the things taken as romantic by other characters being misinterpretions of his internal world. Some of the latter seems to be him bullshitting himself though- "I'm not crying because I'm facing down my beloved student who I've failed horribly and hates me before I off myself without knowing for sure if my contingency plan will work, the sun's just in my eyes", sure Jan. Given how WWX acts its clear that MXTX now knows how to balance internalized homophobia with the character falling in love even if he doesn't realize it, and TGCF doesn't really have internalized homophobia on the protagonists part as far as I've read, he's just a sworn virgin. (However one could argue HC had some issues when he was human depending on how you read the Land of the tender scene).
SVSSS is short compared to her other works, and while I'm not sure how one would do it, having us spend some time with LBH and SQQ after they've gotten rid of his evil sword and SQQ is helping him work through his misanthropy, desire for control, and abandonment issues would improve their relationship from a story perspective, especially because of how obsessive and unhealthy LBH has spent... 8 years of his life regarding SQQ. There's already a foundation with LBH taking SQQ back to his home peak to be taken care of after his near death experience and leaving alone when he gets chased off, and SQQ choosing to go with him with no pressure on him to do so other than LBH's wellbeing (which is no longer tied to things like the apocalypse). I just think there needs to be a bit more between that and what I'm reading in the extras so far.
And it is needed because of how much LBH's dark behavior was directed at SQQ. WWX's dark behavior wasn't so targeted, LWJ's had an instance of targeting but a large part of the novel has been about him doing his best to respect WWX's boundaries and not repeat his parents relationship. I'm not up to snuff on what happened after XL's first banishment yet so I'll keep quiet on that. LBH is so desperate for this one person's affection that he almost destroys the world to ensure he has no other choice but him (and they have terrible fuck or die sex that no one enjoys about it). Evil sword possession making him decide this was a good idea or no, to work as a satisfying romance story, you need to after of all that. Especially because the evil sword had the ability to push him that far because of how chaotic and wrecked his mental and spiritual state were. They're still wrecked.
12 notes
·
View notes
Are Kongs gorillas in your view or do you HC them as being different from any kind of real ape?
// for me, personally... I don't hc them as actual gorillas/whatever ape they appear as, which can get confusing sometimes because a lot of villains @ the Kongs will call them 'stupid monkey/gorilla/chimp/ape/etc.' Which imo also just indicates they're more of a collective species - and more advanced in the sense that the way to insult them is to refer to them as animals.
And while I think it's fun to make DK do a gorilla thing now and then (SMASH NEST) I feel like he displays a lot of different and combined traits of other animals (mainly dogs, cats, and horses), which to me kinda solidifies that 'oh he's kind of like these things...but isn't any one of them. Let's call it a Kong'. That plus I think Kongs being in the jungle would probably be good at mimicking anything they come across whether through sound or movement (they're strong and all, but probably very tasty to some giant slinking jungle kitties.)
I also think that Kongs in general, despite not appearing so - have a type of endowed magic? Not the rah rah flamethrower at will kind, but more of like they each have a pathway that makes it easier for folks to use magic through them (so conduits). I feel like alluding to them having this bespeaks of potential what human world calls sasquatches is kinda fun...in the sense that...well if Peach could wander in from the human world, maybe a few pre historic Kongs could have made it to the human world and evolved more into the sasquatch like being over time. Either way, the sasquatches would be much higher magic users in the sense if you hc them as being able to cloak in and out of being seen (my dumb take on modesty magic for DK.)
Touching briefly on the magic conduit situation, I think I have a hc where there is a Kong hero in the past that is super powerful and when they fall, they use magic in their death to combine their strength with magic and they become a coconut tree that gives the other Kongs the crystal coconut... (morehere.)
3 notes
·
View notes