#I blame Ross
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
km3tt0 · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
GUYS- GUYS-
JUST HEAR ME OUT -
SONGBIRD (Adam/Michael [@neonross vers]) GOOD CRACK SHIP ISTG JUST LISTEN PLEASE-
Tumblr media Tumblr media
(Also this is how it happened ISTG)
222 notes · View notes
lawrussoauto · 1 year ago
Text
the only impression i had of suits for the longest time was my mum saying ‘every girl needs a harvey specter in her life’ and i can safely say that after watching the batshit insane things he does for mike. yea i want a harvey specter
136 notes · View notes
chaoticneutraltor · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
61 notes · View notes
compher · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
read It’s Not Enough To Be In Love here
Fandom: Men’s Hockey RPF
Rating: Teen and Up Audiences
Characters: Ross Colton, Miles Wood, Logan O'Connor, Zach Parise, Colorado Avalanche NHL Team Ensemble
Relationships: Ross Colton/Miles Wood, Ross Colton & Zach Parise, Ross Colton & Logan O'Connor
Freeforms: Alpha/Beta/Omega Dynamics, Non-Traditional Alpha/Beta/Omega Dynamics, Social Media as a Literary Device, Breaking Up & Making Up, Panic Attacks, Misunderstandings, Omega Ross Colton, Alpha Miles Wood, Alpha Logan O’Connor
Word count: 21,886, 11/11 chapters (completed)
13 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 10 months ago
Text
"The feast of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist being appointed as the day upon which the coronation of the king [Edward V] would take place without fail, all both hoped for and expected a season of prosperity for the kingdom."
— Excerpt from the Croyland Continuator / David Horspool, Richard III: A Ruler and Reputation
Even though Edward IV’s death was unexpected, after twelve years of peace there need not have been too much of a sense of foreboding about the succession. The great dynastic wound from which the Wars of the Roses had grown had not so much been healed as cauterized by the extinction of the House of Lancaster. There was no rush for London, as had happened in earlier, disputed successions. The royal party didn’t set out from Ludlow for ten days after hearing the news of Edward IV’s death, while Richard took his time, too. And the new king had [his mother the dowager queen and] two uncles to support him: his mother’s brother, the sophisticated, cultured, highly experienced Earl Rivers; and his father’s, the loyal and reliable Duke of Gloucester, to whom Edward IV had entrusted unprecedented power and vital military command.
... [Richard of Gloucester] had achieved his goal by a mixture of luck and ruthlessness, and if he made it appear, or even believed himself, that destiny played a part, this only made him a man in step with his times. Modern historians have no time for destiny, but sometimes the more ‘structuralist’ interpretations of the events surrounding the usurpation can come close to it. When we read that ‘the chances of preserving an unchallenged succession were . . . weakened by the estrangement of many of the rank-and-file nobility from . . . high politics, which was partly a consequence of the Wars of the Roses and partly of Edward IV’s own policies’, it is hard not to conclude that an unforeseeable turn of events is being recast as a predictable one. But without one overriding factor – the actions of Richard, Duke of Gloucester after he took the decision to make himself King Richard III – none of this could have happened. That is, when the same author concedes ‘Nor can we discount Richard’s own forceful character’, he is pitching it rather low*.
Edward IV had not left behind a factional fault line waiting to be shaken apart. Richard of Gloucester’s decision to usurp was a political earthquake that could not have been forecast on 9 April, when Edward died. After all, Simon Stallworth did not even anticipate it on 21 June, the day before Richard went public. We should be wary of allowing hindsight to give us more clairvoyance than the well-informed contemporary who had no idea ‘what schall happyne’. This is not to argue that Richard’s will alone allowed him to take the Crown. Clearly, the circumstances of a minority, the existence of powerful magnates with access to private forces, and the reasonably recent examples of resorts to violence and deposition of kings, made Richard’s path a more conceivable one. But Richard’s own tactics, his arrest of Rivers, Vaughan and Grey, the rounding up of Hastings and the bishops, relied on surprise. If men as close as these to the workings of high politics at a delicate juncture had no inkling of what might happen, the least historians can do is to reflect that uncertainty [...].
(*The author who Horspool is referencing and disagreeing with is Charles Ross)
#wars of the roses#edward v#richard iii#edward iv#my post#I'm writing a post on this topic but I have no idea when I'll finish it so I figured I should post Horspool's epic analysis#or should I say epic takedown? <3#friendly reminder that Richard's usurpation happened primarily and decidedly because of Richard's own decisions and actions#we need to stop downplaying his singular agency and accountability by casting the blame on others#most of all Elizabeth Woodville and her family but also the bizarre interpretation of historians like Ross and Pollard (et al)#who somehow hold Edward more responsible (through a 'structuralist' view as Horspool says) even though that literally makes no sense#also friendly reminder that actual contemporaries did not view Edward V's minority as a sign of worry and potential discontent#quite the opposite - they expected him to have a prosperous reign. which made sense since Edward IV left his son a far more stable#country than any former minor king (and most other adult kings tbh). The irony is that it was his son's usurper who benefitted from it.#also I added Elizabeth Woodville to the list because Edward V himself specifically said that he trusted the governance of the country#'to the peers of the realm and the queen' as quoted by Mancini (likely relayed to him by John Argentine)#and this is supported by evidence. After Edward's death the Croyland Continuator substitutes Elizabeth's role in the council#for that of the King: 'the counsellors of the king now deceased were present with the queen'#we know Elizabeth presided over all the council's decisions and initiated proposals (the size of her son's military escort) on her own#She was clearly the one with the most authority in the council (who were described as being present with *her* not anyone else)#Hastings made demands but he couldn't enforce them at all (and was in fact worried). It was clearly Elizabeth who had that power.#She was likely going to play a very prominent role during her son's minority and imo it's problematic to assume otherwise#(Lynda Pidgeon assumes otherwise but she's based her assumption on objectively false information so I don't think we should take her#seriously)(see: she claims that EW lacked influence compared to her male relatives in royal councils when EW HERSELF WAS IN ROYAL COUNCILS)#That's not to go too far the other direction and claim EW tried to dominate and tactlessly exclude others - we know she didn't#The impression we get by this first council and by Richard's own actions indicates that she Richard and Anthony would likely#work *together* when it came to governing the realm#I do find it frustrating when people disregard the fact that based on the impression we have she would've had a very visible#and powerful role
11 notes · View notes
wolfwillowisp · 3 days ago
Text
Another day volunteering at the Hoover dam, everyone keeps asking me if they can fuck Megatron. Buddy, they won’t even let me fuck Megatron.
6 notes · View notes
backseatloversz · 5 months ago
Text
ohh.remembered the reason i stopped trying to make it through the panic at the disco pre-split interviews playlist on youtube.com is because theyre so painfully awkward & dry
3 notes · View notes
sunshineandlyrics · 8 months ago
Text
😲
Joshua' reaction to seeing the metal fence in front of him fall down along with some fans, as he was filming fans outside Louis' hotel, 31 May 2024.
6 notes · View notes
Text
I have an idea for a tdiz fic (my first one) but that requires me to write and we (me and writing) are currently on a "break" ala Rachel and Ross style where, unfortunately, I am not Rachel so I will not be writing a letter that is "Eighteen pages! Front and back!" which, honestly, would solve everything...
Le sigh...
5 notes · View notes
sortanonymous · 5 months ago
Text
Oh yeah, I kinda forgot to mention it for almost a week, but I'm so happy to see Chase Briscoe and Stewart-Haas Racing go out on a high note with that thrilling Southern 500 win!
Also as a Chastain fan, I'm kind of in hell! (Also feel for Bubba and Buescher, especially with how awful the win-and-your-in format is.)
2 notes · View notes
desire-mona · 8 months ago
Text
my biggest achievement on this platform is the fact that chandler has a tag specifically for reblogging my posts
6 notes · View notes
lawrussoauto · 1 year ago
Text
oh whats on my mind? nothing. just thinking about mike ross saying he could pull off drag because he has soft features. and im being normal about it
10 notes · View notes
hungee-boy · 6 months ago
Text
i dont know if i ever shared this story but washing my hair and thinking of my dad reminded me of it
when my dad died, he had his hair pretty long and in a ponytail and we asked for his ponytail to be cut so we could save his hair
it might seem weird and it hasnt been done in my family before in my knowledge but we all consented to his hair being cut and it wouldnt have been something he opposed
when his funeral was coming up i was debating cutting my hair the same way, just forming a ponytail and having my cousin cut it but before the funeral when i was messaging my cousin to ask her, i felt a warm tingling pressure on the top of my head
i dont know if i believe in ghosts and never physically interacted with ghosts (i guess you could say ive "felt" them before, like feeling a towering but gentle male presence in my grandmas house that matched with her father's description) but ive never physically seen apparitions or heard voices or felt touches
it felt like my dad was placing his hand on my head and it was so weird and comforting that i decided not to cut my hair and only once that thought crossed my mind and i deleted the message to my cousin was when the sensation stopped
call it a hallucination brought on by grief or a supernatural occurrence but it definitely sticks with me now and id like to believe it really was my dad telling me not to cut my hair for his sake
2 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 10 months ago
Text
A.J Pollard’s biography on Edward IV was so cringe lol (generic; minor but frustrating inaccuracies; intensely judgmental at times and oddly dismissive at others while never considering the broader context; entirely diminished and trivialized Elizabeth Woodville as both queen and wife of his main subject in the name of "defending" her; created a false dichotomy between Edward and Henry VII’s styles of ruling and lauded the latter at the former’s expense even though Henry literally followed Edward’s example for the very things Pollard was criticizing Edward for; had a downright nonsensical and thoroughly misleading conclusion about Edward’s legacy & Richard’s usurpation that was based entirely on hindsight, Pollard's own assumptions, and the complete downplaying Richard’s agency and actions to emphasize what Pollard wrongly and misleadingly claimed were Edward's so-called 'failings', etc, etc)
I wanted to buy his book on Henry V but after reading this shitshow and the synopsis of that book, im guessing it's going to be 10x worse, so...no thanks
#history media#this was written months ago im posting it to get it out of my drafts#it wasn't necessarily BAD. it was generic and readable. but it was very disappointing and misleading and its conclusion was just nonsense#listen I have no patience for the dumbfuck idea that edward somehow had the ultimate responsibility for his own son's deposition because#of his 'policies' during his reign. like I said it's based fully on hindsight and entirely devoid of actual context. it's bafflingly stupid#literally everyone expected Edward V to succeed his father and 'both hoped for and expected' (Croyland's own words) a successful reign#Edward V's deposition was richard and solely Richard's fault lol this should not be difficult to understand#the reason Richard's usurpation was possible in the first place was bcause everyone expected E5 to succeed and didn't expect Richard#do to what he did. nothing would have happened without his initiative and decisions. it had nothing to do with Edward's 'policies'#Edward's policies were fine. henry vii - who pollard vaunts to no end - literally *followed* them#and claiming that he failed to unite England under the Yorkist dynasty is just plain stupid#buddy if he truly failed at that then neither Richard III nor Henry VII would have thrones lol. both emphasized continuity with#him when aiming for the throne. like the whole point of 1483-85 was that it was a conflict WITHIN the 'Yorkist' dynasty#it was not an external threat against it.#'his legacy failed' his legacy didn't fail his brother destroyed it (while also presenting himself as his heir because logic what's logic?)#henry's victory was very much the triumph of his legacy (a claimant chosen by his supporters as the husband of his daughter)#like this is really not my interpretation it is literally what happened#i'm not trying to glorify e4 but his son did inherit the throne in a more advantageous circumstances than any other minor king of england#and frankly than most other adult kings. dumping blame on Edward's literal corpse rather than acknowledge Richard's agency is so tasteless#the problem isn't that edward made a mistake in trusting his brother. many other kings including Henry V also trusted theirs.#the problem is that his brother was willing to break that trust in a way that was unprecedented and broke all political norms of that age#ie: Richard's usurpation occurred because of Richard who re-ignited conflict to make himself king. please drill this into your head#also btw this illogical 'interpretation' is based entirely on Charles Ross' hatred and derision towards Elizabeth Woodville and her family#if you agree with this inteterpretation you agree with his vilification of them 🤷🏻‍♀️#anyway if you want a better interpretation that's actually analytical and looks a relevant rather than a flawed retrospective perspective#i would recommend rosemary horrox's 'richard iii: a study of service' and david horspool's 'richard iii: a ruler and his reputation'#anyway one last time: STOP downplaying Richard's agency and actions. historians who do this are stupid and embarrassing. bye.#(i should really post horspool's glorious takedown of ross and Pollard huh? it was very entertaining to read)
9 notes · View notes
magesmiths · 2 years ago
Text
tagged by @narrativefoiltrope (MWAH) to do my spotify receipt <3
Tumblr media
…can u tell i have a hyperfixation
tagging @jametartt @lilas @sebwynric @farahswife @faithsedge @khiita to share too if u want!
8 notes · View notes
ourladyoftheflytrap · 1 year ago
Text
Okay so he wants to love me exactly as I am he wants to live and die for me he wants to be my pet that follows me around to every corner of the earth. so why do I treat him like shit 🤔
3 notes · View notes