#Evolutionary traits
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
"Unraveling the Human Tapestry: Frank Hamel's 'Human Animals'—A Journey into the Complex Nature of Humanity"
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is a thought-provoking exploration of the intricate interplay between our human nature and the animal instincts that reside within us. This fascinating journey into the realms of biology, psychology, and societal constructs unfolds with a narrative precision that both challenges and enlightens. The title itself serves as a prelude to a comprehensive examination of the dualities that define our existence—a title that hints at the untamed aspects of our being, waiting to be unraveled.
Published in [Year], "Human Animals" is a testament to Hamel's keen intellectual curiosity and his ability to distill complex concepts into a narrative accessible to a broad audience. The title alludes to the central theme—the recognition that beneath our veneer of civilization, there exists a primal essence shared with our fellow creatures in the animal kingdom.
Hamel's exploration begins with a scientific lens, dissecting the biological similarities between humans and other animals. The opening chapters lay the groundwork for understanding our shared ancestry, evolutionary traits, and the genetic links that bind us to the broader animal kingdom. The title "Human Animals" becomes a guide through this scientific inquiry, inviting readers to reconsider their perception of human uniqueness.
Beyond the biological, Hamel delves into the psychological dimensions of our shared humanity. He navigates the complexities of human behavior, emotions, and social structures, drawing connections between our actions and those observed in the animal world. The title encapsulates this psychological journey, suggesting that within our societal constructs, there exist primal instincts that shape our behaviors.
Hamel's writing is not merely an academic discourse; it is a bridge between the scientific and the philosophical. The narrative is enriched by anecdotes, case studies, and historical examples that add a human touch to the exploration. The title serves as a thematic compass, signaling to readers that they are embarking on a nuanced exploration of what it means to be human, entwined with our animalistic roots.
As the book progresses, Hamel ventures into the ethical considerations surrounding our treatment of animals and the environmental impact of human activities. The title becomes a poignant reminder of the responsibility we bear as stewards of the planet, urging readers to reflect on the consequences of our actions on the delicate balance of the natural world.
"Human Animals" is not just an examination of our shared biological heritage; it is a call to introspection and societal self-reflection. Hamel challenges preconceived notions, inviting readers to confront uncomfortable truths about the intersections of humanity and animality. The title, with its enigmatic allure, guides readers through a labyrinth of ethical contemplation.
In conclusion, "Human Animals" by Frank Hamel is a captivating exploration that transcends disciplinary boundaries. The title encapsulates the essence of the book—a multifaceted exploration of the intricate connections between humanity and the animal kingdom. Hamel's prose is engaging, his ideas are profound, and the title acts as an evocative portal into the depths of our shared nature. As readers journey through the pages, "Human Animals" leaves an indelible impression, challenging us to peel back the layers of societal conditioning and reevaluate our place within the vast tapestry of the natural world.
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is available in Amazon in paperback 15.99$ and hardcover 23.99$ editions.
Number of pages: 399
Language: English
Rating: 9/10
Link of the book!
Review By: King's Cat
#Frank Hamel#Human Animals#Biological similarities#Animal instincts#Dualities of existence#Evolutionary traits#Genetic links#Animal kingdom#Scientific exploration#Primal essence#Shared ancestry#Psychological dimensions#Human behavior#Social structures#Societal constructs#Human uniqueness#Philosophical inquiry#Anecdotes#Case studies#Historical examples#Ethical considerations#Environmental impact#Stewards of the planet#Consequences of actions#Delicate balance#Responsibility#Call to introspection#Societal self-reflection#Challenging preconceived notions#Uncomfortable truths
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
#animals are born with their most important survival skill inherant#horses can stand#snakes can bite#humans can ask for help
Have you ever considered how fucking astonishing babies crying is?
The young of other animals don’t make noise, or if they do, barely any at all. Baby birds only start chirping when their parents come back with the food, kittens meow to their mothers because cat communication is extremely subtle and drawing your caretaker’s attention may require a sound when you have eight siblings. At this point, they can already see and walk.
But human babies? Crying is essentially the first willful action that they learn. Months before being able to move on your own, or even hold your own fucking head up, or being able to choose when and where you defecate. Before anything else, a skill more valuable than anything else, is a distress call.
A distress call specifically intended to be impossible to ignore.
Before object permanence or theory of mind, without even an understanding of what help they need, who could provide it, and whether they choose to do so, a human being is capable of expressing that there is something wrong in the state they are in, that they are powerless to correct on their own.
This is what was evolutionarily selected above silent babies that did not attract predators. This is what was selected instead of young who could instantly walk. This is what was selected as the ideal offspring for the human race. Not one that runs. Not one that hides. Not one that can fend for itself. A creature that can communicate, if only the simplest, most inherent message: I need help.
82K notes
·
View notes
Text
"Unraveling the Human Tapestry: Frank Hamel's 'Human Animals'—A Journey into the Complex Nature of Humanity"
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is a thought-provoking exploration of the intricate interplay between our human nature and the animal instincts that reside within us. This fascinating journey into the realms of biology, psychology, and societal constructs unfolds with a narrative precision that both challenges and enlightens. The title itself serves as a prelude to a comprehensive examination of the dualities that define our existence—a title that hints at the untamed aspects of our being, waiting to be unraveled.
Published in [Year], "Human Animals" is a testament to Hamel's keen intellectual curiosity and his ability to distill complex concepts into a narrative accessible to a broad audience. The title alludes to the central theme—the recognition that beneath our veneer of civilization, there exists a primal essence shared with our fellow creatures in the animal kingdom.
Hamel's exploration begins with a scientific lens, dissecting the biological similarities between humans and other animals. The opening chapters lay the groundwork for understanding our shared ancestry, evolutionary traits, and the genetic links that bind us to the broader animal kingdom. The title "Human Animals" becomes a guide through this scientific inquiry, inviting readers to reconsider their perception of human uniqueness.
Beyond the biological, Hamel delves into the psychological dimensions of our shared humanity. He navigates the complexities of human behavior, emotions, and social structures, drawing connections between our actions and those observed in the animal world. The title encapsulates this psychological journey, suggesting that within our societal constructs, there exist primal instincts that shape our behaviors.
Hamel's writing is not merely an academic discourse; it is a bridge between the scientific and the philosophical. The narrative is enriched by anecdotes, case studies, and historical examples that add a human touch to the exploration. The title serves as a thematic compass, signaling to readers that they are embarking on a nuanced exploration of what it means to be human, entwined with our animalistic roots.
As the book progresses, Hamel ventures into the ethical considerations surrounding our treatment of animals and the environmental impact of human activities. The title becomes a poignant reminder of the responsibility we bear as stewards of the planet, urging readers to reflect on the consequences of our actions on the delicate balance of the natural world.
"Human Animals" is not just an examination of our shared biological heritage; it is a call to introspection and societal self-reflection. Hamel challenges preconceived notions, inviting readers to confront uncomfortable truths about the intersections of humanity and animality. The title, with its enigmatic allure, guides readers through a labyrinth of ethical contemplation.
In conclusion, "Human Animals" by Frank Hamel is a captivating exploration that transcends disciplinary boundaries. The title encapsulates the essence of the book—a multifaceted exploration of the intricate connections between humanity and the animal kingdom. Hamel's prose is engaging, his ideas are profound, and the title acts as an evocative portal into the depths of our shared nature. As readers journey through the pages, "Human Animals" leaves an indelible impression, challenging us to peel back the layers of societal conditioning and reevaluate our place within the vast tapestry of the natural world.
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is available in Amazon in paperback 15.99$ and hardcover 23.99$ editions.
Number of pages: 399
Language: English
Rating: 9/10
Link of the book!
Review By: King's Cat
#Frank Hamel#Human Animals#Biological similarities#Animal instincts#Dualities of existence#Evolutionary traits#Genetic links#Animal kingdom#Scientific exploration#Primal essence#Shared ancestry#Psychological dimensions#Human behavior#Social structures#Societal constructs#Human uniqueness#Philosophical inquiry#Anecdotes#Case studies#Historical examples#Ethical considerations#Environmental impact#Stewards of the planet#Consequences of actions#Delicate balance#Responsibility#Call to introspection#Societal self-reflection#Challenging preconceived notions#Uncomfortable truths
0 notes
Note
A question for the fairies! Why do y'all have legs if you float everywhere? Is it some kindof evolutionary leftover? Or to be more familiar to humans? (Btw I love your series/headcanons, and I love the designs of everyone!)
The reason they have legs is becau-
Oh! Yeah, sure, ok. Go ahead, Cosmo.
....
Well you heard it here folks!!!! Right from the source!!
Bitties Series: [Start] > [Previous] > [Next]
#fairly oddparents#fop#fop a new wish#fop cosmo#cosmo#asks#itty bitties fop au#stephanweaverofworlds#....i think cosmo got a bit of stage fright there.#hrm.#WELL ANYWAYS#fairies are a parasitic sort of creatures. they require high levels of mimicry in order to survive and thrive.#legs were an evolutionary trait to make them more appealing to humans- a prey that makes a majority of their diet.#a bit like how carnivore flowers release sickly sweet smells to attract flies!
386 notes
·
View notes
Text
hey i couldn't sleep last night because it's always "uchiha are so power hungry and blood thirsty that they'll kill their loved ones and steal their body parts" and never "uchiha are often forced into witnessing their loved one's deaths and taking the most important part of them to ensure their survival, which is violently trauma-inducing"...the latter of which is actually what happened in every known case of ms death
#uchiha clan#uchiha headcanons#pro uchiha#if nothing else it's a double edged evolutionary trait#like how fucked up is it that youre dying and on your death bed you have to try and get to your closest person#in hopes that they feel the same so with witnessing your death and taking your eyes#they can gain the power to survive enemies that you couldnt
93 notes
·
View notes
Text
(mgv) house and wilson display courting behaviors and don't even realize it. granted, courting in that sense is out of style and traditionalist so even if they did believe they were doing it, they'd wrinkle their noses (house especially). but like.... house buying them expensive tickets to a thing is an opportunity to grow closer, wilson letting his food get stolen isn't just a show of patience but proof he can be a good provider, etc etc. the amount of times they get mistaken for a couple in omegaverse is, in turn, much greater than it already is in canon
#house md#hilson#i can imagine some people are more food aggressive naturally as it's an evolutionary trait#parents typically teach their kids not to bite if anything else should anyone reach for their food#but once they come into secondary puberty the instinct can return with a vengeance#so the 90% of the time that wilson doesn't even twitch as house steals half his lunch is a ->#sign of just how close they are AND how much wilson actually likes house#because food sharing is a love language no matter the au it's in real life it's oouguhhh#i've been on this rant before i know i have#and they (general public) don't even know how many times wilson brings dinner home too..........#“home” to house's place. even if wilson HAS A WIFE AND HIS OWN PLACE#and that's just canon. this show makes me sick (i am having a great time with house md)#mgv
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
been thinking abt pikmin dudes (ty for the inspo @krizkrozapplesoz!)
[image desc in alt]
#doodles#pikmin#captain olimar#pikmin louie#made olimar look more grizzled than intended#i know hes a sweet some guy I apologize#other lil ideas inspired by what ive seen#uhhh olimar's species (i havent thought of a name yet) are highly adaptable#through the development of space travel early on in their history it just led to a bunch of evolutionary offshoots#leading to an interwoven businesses n just this cosmic net of connection#and also! the species just gaining different traits with each planet they belong to#hocatate being a desert planet lead to people uhh being made more for that enviroment#:y that and i treat their homeplanets more like nationalities than different species but thats just me#also yes god finally posting these doodles
102 notes
·
View notes
Text
Theories of Personality
Theories of personality aim to explain how and why individuals differ in their patterns of behavior, thinking, and emotions. There are several major theories that attempt to describe and categorize personality traits and development.
1. Psychoanalytic Theory (Sigmund Freud)
Core Idea: Freud’s theory of personality revolves around the interaction of the id (basic instincts), ego (rational thought), and superego (moral standards). He believed that personality develops through early childhood experiences and unconscious conflicts.
Structure of Personality: Freud proposed that the unconscious mind plays a key role in shaping behavior and personality, with unresolved internal conflicts influencing behavior.
Defense Mechanisms: Freud also suggested that individuals use defense mechanisms, such as repression or denial, to cope with anxiety and protect their self-image.
Stages of Development: The theory includes psychosexual stages (oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital stages), with conflicts at each stage influencing adult personality.
2. Humanistic Theory (Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow)
Core Idea: Humanistic theories emphasize personal growth, free will, and self-actualization. These theories view humans as inherently good, striving to reach their full potential.
Self-Actualization: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs posits that individuals move through a series of needs, from basic physiological needs to self-actualization, where they fulfill their potential and experience personal growth.
Carl Rogers’ Person-Centered Theory: Rogers introduced the concept of the self-concept, which is how people perceive themselves. He believed that for individuals to achieve their full potential, they need an environment that provides genuineness, acceptance, and empathy.
Unconditional Positive Regard: Rogers argued that receiving unconditional love and acceptance is key to developing a healthy personality and self-esteem.
3. Trait Theory (Gordon Allport, Raymond Cattell, Hans Eysenck)
Core Idea: Trait theories suggest that personality is made up of broad, enduring traits or characteristics that determine behavior.
Gordon Allport: He identified three types of traits: cardinal traits (dominant traits that define an individual), central traits (general traits that form the basic foundation of personality), and secondary traits (more specific traits that appear in certain situations).
Raymond Cattell: Cattell used factor analysis to identify 16 personality factors, suggesting that a combination of these factors defines a person’s unique personality.
Hans Eysenck: Eysenck's model focused on three dimensions of personality: extraversion-introversion, neuroticism-stability, and psychoticism (related to aggressiveness and antisocial tendencies).
4. The Big Five (Five-Factor Model)
Core Idea: The Big Five personality traits are the most widely accepted framework for understanding personality. These traits are thought to exist along a continuum, and people fall at different points within these five dimensions:
Openness to Experience: Creative, curious, open to new ideas vs. traditional, routine-oriented.
Conscientiousness: Organized, responsible, goal-oriented vs. careless, impulsive.
Extraversion: Sociable, outgoing vs. introverted, reserved.
Agreeableness: Cooperative, compassionate vs. antagonistic, competitive.
Neuroticism: Emotionally unstable, anxious vs. emotionally stable, calm.
This model is considered to capture the basic structure of personality across different cultures and contexts.
5. Social-Cognitive Theory (Albert Bandura)
Core Idea: Personality is shaped by the interaction between personal factors (cognitive abilities, beliefs, emotions), behavior, and environment. This is known as reciprocal determinism.
Self-Efficacy: Bandura introduced the concept of self-efficacy, which is the belief in one's ability to succeed in specific situations. High self-efficacy leads to more persistence and confidence in challenging tasks, while low self-efficacy can lead to avoidance of difficult situations.
Observational Learning: Bandura also emphasized the role of modeling and observational learning in personality development, arguing that people learn behaviors and emotional responses by observing others.
6. Behaviorist Theory (B.F. Skinner)
Core Idea: Behaviorists argue that personality is the result of learned behaviors, shaped by rewards and punishments in an individual's environment.
Operant Conditioning: Skinner focused on operant conditioning, where behavior is influenced by reinforcement (positive or negative) or punishment. Over time, individuals develop consistent behavioral patterns based on their experiences with rewards and consequences.
Environmental Determinism: Behaviorists view personality as a product of the external environment rather than internal traits or unconscious forces.
7. Biological and Evolutionary Theories (Hans Eysenck, David Buss)
Core Idea: Biological theories emphasize that personality traits have genetic underpinnings and that human behavior is influenced by evolutionary processes.
Eysenck’s Biological Basis of Personality: Eysenck proposed that personality traits like extraversion and neuroticism are linked to biological differences in brain arousal and functioning.
Evolutionary Psychology: David Buss and other evolutionary psychologists argue that personality traits evolved to solve problems related to survival and reproduction. For instance, traits like aggression or cooperation may have developed as adaptive strategies in human evolutionary history.
8. Cognitive-Behavioral Theory
Core Idea: This theory integrates elements from both cognitive and behavioral psychology. It suggests that cognitive processes (thought patterns, beliefs) play a crucial role in determining behavior and, therefore, personality.
Aaron Beck’s Cognitive Theory: Beck emphasized how automatic thoughts and cognitive distortions (like overgeneralization or catastrophic thinking) shape personality and emotional responses.
Cognitive Restructuring: In cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), individuals learn to identify and change negative thought patterns, which in turn influences their behavior and personality over time.
9. Narrative Identity Theory
Core Idea: Narrative identity theory suggests that individuals construct a life story or narrative to make sense of their experiences and define their identity. This narrative evolves over time, reflecting personal growth, values, and social influences.
Dan McAdams: McAdams proposed that personal identity is shaped by the stories we tell about ourselves. People seek coherence and meaning in their life stories, which reflect their personality traits, goals, and values.
This approach emphasizes that personality is not just a set of static traits but an evolving narrative shaped by personal choices and experiences.
10. Existential and Phenomenological Theories
Core Idea: These theories focus on individual experience, freedom, and the search for meaning. Existential psychologists like Rollo May and Viktor Frankl argue that personality is shaped by how individuals confront fundamental existential questions, such as the meaning of life, freedom, and death.
Frankl's Logotherapy: Viktor Frankl emphasized the importance of finding meaning in life, even in suffering, as the central drive in human behavior. He believed that the quest for meaning shapes personality and behavior.
Authenticity and Choice: Existential psychology stresses that individuals are responsible for their own choices, and living authentically means confronting existential realities and making choices in alignment with one’s values.
Theories of personality offer different perspectives on the factors that shape human behavior and individual differences. From Freud’s focus on unconscious drives to the modern trait theories like the Big Five, these approaches explore the intricate dynamics of behavior, thought, and emotion that constitute personality.
#philosophy#epistemology#knowledge#learning#education#chatgpt#psychology#Personality Theory#Psychoanalysis#Humanistic Psychology#Trait Theory#Big Five#Social-Cognitive Theory#Behaviorism#Cognitive Theory#Evolutionary Psychology#Narrative Identity
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
do you ever set up your workspace and become some sort of brady bunch-adjacent hell
#driftoodles#bane kniaz (oc)#penumbra#miss rakna kadaki doesnt have a name yet ive literally just been caling her miss rakna/ milfna kadaki#bane is a runaway royal doubling as a scrivener/handler in the new world. he mains insect glaive/dual blades#his bit id that he loves mondter research but is terrified of monsters in practice including domestic ones like poogie#miss rakna is a 'widowed' 'wyverian' whos been working on evolutionary neuropteron temnoceran and carapaceon#she also studies elder dragons and rare toxins.#lobo's lore is the fifth fleet caught him after he fell out of the sky and into the ocean one stormy day (theory has it he was being >#> carried off by a rathalos) and they cant rlly figure out WHAT he is bc he walks like he's a wyverian but he only has the gait and ears#he gets paired with bane as a hunter/handler duo bc lobo doesnt have the patience for other handlers.#werewyvern....hes a charge blade/insect glaive main n is always surrounded by dracophage or fulgurbugs and doesnt know why#penumbra is a frenzy researcher :]#and yes bane is the only human in the group#i wanted to draw them in modern wear with rheir more monstrous traits#but realized miss rakna needs. more spidery aspects so im not too sure where to go eith her more monstery design#monhun#uuuh#wip#this is also set to not rebloggable i just wanted to show my wip and terrible workspace rn
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
whats this guys deal
#i dont think its a native tree cause most aus native trees have evolutionary traits which help them absorb LESS sunlight#but the fact that this guys branches and leaves go straight up . like the branches fan out but then grow vertically#that seems like a trait to collect more sunshine#idk tho . idk
12 notes
·
View notes
Note
Silly Game Time: What was the most recent internet search you're comfortable with sharing?
do birds exhibit handedness?
(they do)
#it seems parrots tend to be left-handed 🤔#now I need to see how far back in the evolutionary line this trait is expressed lol#hey google do fish exhibit handedness—#thanks for the ask!!!#asks
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
dont you dare put male gaze and evolutionary theory on the damn fucking sentence im going to go sicko on some people
#txt#it's a term media for narratives it is not for real people second the evolutionary traits of misogyny????
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
I’m. Half awake and my brain went
“The alpha, beta, and omega names prob aren’t the same terms used in every culture in the omegaverse. We use them regardless bc in our world we’re recognizing the same literature trope based off of false reports of wolf behavior in the west. But they would have their own terms”
And now im just like. Thinking about how the different terms and linguistic choices would say a lot abt how that culture views the various sexes
They might have terms specific for male and female or even intersex individuals who are alpha, beta, or omegas unlike how in English we just say, for example “male omega” or just omega. They might have very strict gender roles for each of those categories rather than male and female alphas presuming to mostly share behavior
Or how in Eng bc ‘alpha’ is a symbol that comes before ‘omega’, alphas are presumed to have an inherent higher hierarchy status, but what about cultures where omegas are seen as the ones central to society? Or ones where the terms are seen as equal and instead reinforced positive traits they tend to have rather than measure aggression, leadership, and status?
#omegaverse#this isn’t rly good and this universe is cursed I know#however I think the hypothetical world is fascinating to play with#why alphas and betas and omegas have certain traits and the evolutionary need#if some cultures see marriage and mating as entirely separate things#and now this
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
evolution is so fucked up like. every single mutation is random, animals dont decide "damn id like a longer neck" one of a herd suddenly gets a slightly longer neck due to a random genetic mutation (that in mammals occurs at an average rate of 2.2 × 10−9 per base pair per year. thats 0.000000002.2 mutations a year. "per base pair" makes it confusing but basically for every cell which has dna and replicates, for each of those base pairs, there is us a 2.2 × 10-9 chance of that base pair being different in the new cell) and for it to be passed on it cant be a somatic mutation (mutation in any cell that isnt a reproductive cell) it has to be a mutation that occurs during reproduction/crossing over or a mutation during production of new gametes (reproductive cells) AND it has to be a mutation that directly affects an exon (coding region of a gene, there are parts of genes called "introns" which are removed before the mRNA coding a protein starts to code that protein so a mutation in an intron does nothing) AND it has to be a significant enough benefit (or coincide with another generational event like a bottleneck) for that trait to spread to every single animal in the species (most mutations are neutral or negative). and there are other barriers like transposons (which can sometimes aid bigger evolutionary trait changes by inserting themselves into a region of a gene that would. e.g., suppress a protein coding region so suddenly that region is coding for a protein) AND genetic redundancy (organisms have multiple copies of the important genes so if one gets knocked out by a transposon or a scientist the organism can still grow and live) like. things still evolve???? in positive ways???? i cant express how wild that is to me. evolution.
#this is like.. my transcription + evolutionary genetics + plant genetics courses all condensed into one text post#its also one of my pet peeves when people are like evolution decided - no it didnt. the organism decided this was a beneficial trait#and evolved it - no it didnt. evolution is a random game of chance played against every odd you can imagine over millions of years#like i didnt even touch genetic drift here#anyway. i would like to give people the benefit of the doubt and go 'i can see why people dont believe its real' but like#i don't think people who dont believe in evolution understand it to this depth to think about how batshit it is that evolution actually#exists you know. the anti evolution talk is more 'how did monkeys become people? those are different things.' and not like#the odds of developing a CORNEA??? ARE YOU KIDDING ME????#also i pulled the stat from a random paper i googled i dont remember statistics lol
15 notes
·
View notes
Note
Favourite treats?
old people candy, rock candies and barley sugars and stuff like that
shout out to these things, also raisins i like those as well, oh and black licorice, living with old people for a lot of my life has rubbed off on me i think
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Made an entire alien species to have lore behind my "space angel" alien motherfucker because now he just needs his story and I'm set
I want to figure out organ systems and dietary components and base elements (non-carbon based life forms) and other life on their home planet and much much more, but I'll do that later
#i like creating species and speculative biology#especially because i designed them to be a prey species who- instead of just outsmarting or avoiding predators like humans- made them extinc#extinct*#because its cool and then i can include prey traits on an apex predator species (quills and pads and extra arms for foraging)#and following evolutionary rules every animal on their planet wpuld have to have 8 legs#which is something that bothered me in the Avatar movies because#the whole way you tell the difference between human in a skinsuit and actual Na'vi is an evolutionary difference in their hands#but everything else doesnt line up#unless everything with only 4 limbs has vestigial limbs theres either mulitple evolutionary lines and different ancestors#or they didnt plan very well and i want to know which#my art#alien oc#alien art#speculative biology#speculative evolution
4 notes
·
View notes