#Cholesterol Normal Range
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Cholesterol
Here find detailed info on: Cholesterol Levels. Know about, Cholesterol Foods. Cholesterol Symptoms. Cholesterol Causes. Cholesterol Levels By Age Chart. Know, How To Reduce Cholesterol?... from Rajashree Gadgil… Top Nutritionist in Thane & the founder of TruWellth Integrative Health Center… the best nutrition center in Thane.
#Cholesterol Levels#Cholesterol Normal Range#How To Reduce Cholesterol#Cholesterol Foods#Hdl Cholesterol#Cholesterol Test#Cholesterol Levels By Age Chart#Symptoms of High Cholesterol in Females#Cholesterol Symptoms#Cholesterol Causes
0 notes
Text
just got my blood test results back and i am startlingly healthy for my age and weight i should do drugs about it
#selfie tag#my cholesterol levels were alarmingly healthy#the only thing that was out of normal range was white blood cell count (ive got the flu)#anyway who wants to smoke weed and watch minecraft videos with me
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
my labs from yesterday morning were already done: my testosterone is actually a little above average (for my age) made coffee and walked to market to get apples and this very mid pan au chocolate and now home for duddy cuddles
#some of my cholesterol is still high#but some have made it to normal range#and the out of normal values are trending towards desired/safe ranges#I really don’t wanna start a permanent medication so will see what doctor thinks about retest again in 6 months
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
😞
got my blood drawn today please pray that the vials hold the answer
#my cholesterols are wonky but. everything else was within normal ranges#please i need Something ANYTHING. I'M SO SICK
41 notes
·
View notes
Text
I want to talk a bit about the whole "fat trans men are denied top surgery" thing because it's true. Many surgeons have BMI requirements and will not operate on anyone classified as more than "overweight".
But I also want to discuss how testosterone often makes you gain weight, putting trans mascs in a fairly difficult position.
When I started testosterone, I weighed 178lbs. I rapidly shot up to 198lbs. At 5'10" I'm classified as just over a BMI of 30 according to my discharge papers, making me classified as obese. I also started having a bit of a cholesterol problem and being that A: I've also hit my 30s in that time and B: I have an extensive family history of high cholesterol in the men in my family, we tried changing my diet and exercise to see if it was lifestyle or if it was genetic.
In that timespan I dropped 3lbs (bringing me to 195lbs, just under that obese line) and my cholesterol continued to climb. It's been about 7 or 8 months with no other change.
When I tell people that I weigh roughly 200lbs, they don't normally believe me. To be clear I don't really care about any of these numbers, I care about my overall health irt stamina, strength, fatigue, etc and I care about my actual muscle mass and body condition. There are, admittedly, times where I look at my stomach and go :( aww I used to be skinnier. But then there's also times like two nights ago when I looked in the mirror after my shower and just saw A Guy standing there looking at me.
Anyway. My point is, testosterone (and age) made me gain a significant amount of weight, and nothing really I've done has gotten it off. Which is fine with me, because I feel better at this current condition and am stronger and have more stamina than I ever did at lower weights even when I was a competing athlete. Everyone I tell my weight and BMI to is shocked to learn that I am 200lbs and classified as obese. From complete disbelief until I stand on a scale, to the immediate "you wear it well" or "it's all muscle though", to the inevitable "okay but BMI is a load of shit anyway", clearly even though that's what the numbers say I am not exactly the poster child for what lawmakers and fat phobic doctors fear monger about when they discuss the "obesity epidemic".
I am lucky enough that while my surgeon is being very annoying in other ways, she at least has no BMI requirement. For 7 or so months I have been putting in a lot of effort to try and lose some weight to fix my cholesterol and I have pretty much nothing to show for it. If it's that hard for me, someone who visually doesn't really look fat, how difficult must it be for someone who is definitely not toeing the line like I am. How impossible for someone who is in the 400lb, 500lb, 600lb range.
Testosterone makes you gain weigh, and then surgeons won't operate if you gain too much. What a fucking joke.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Everose capsule is an ayurvedic medicine for treating various diseases
Everose capsule is an ayurvedic medicine for treating various diseases such as problems related to your skin like acne, it also helps in the most common skin-related problem which is eczema. The oil has the main ingredient Gamma-linolenic Acid, which is an effective antioxidant. It also improves overall skin health. In Premenstrual syndrome, this capsule is very effective.
In case of high blood pressure, this medication can also be used. Along with these medical benefits, it also benefits many other conditions. It is a herbal and ayurvedic product so it could be taken daily without having any adverse effect on health.
#Everose softgelatin capsule#cholesterol levels normal#stress anxiety and depression#normal cholesterol level in blood#total cholesterol normal range#depression and anxiety#depression#anxiety#bone health
0 notes
Text
The following information is from Sickening, by John Abramson:
Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist on main but when I say Big Pharma is a racket I mean...
Doctors work via particular guidelines. Many of them are punished by their hospital systems if they fail to follow those guidelines, which are considered "best practice". The guidelines are written largely by pharmaceutical companies or people paid by pharmaceutical companies.
Just like Disney likes to keep it's copyrights fresh, pharmaceutical companies like to keep their patents. And they do this by churning out new drugs. Only about 1 in every 8 of these new drugs actually represents an actual advantage over existing drugs or therapies. They, of course, market the absolute shit out of all of them as though they did.
In theory, newer insulin analogs (lispro, glargine, etc...) work better and have fewer side effects than older recombinant human insulins (regular, NPH). In the actual trials the only difference between the two is a single average non-fatal hypoglycemic event over the course of 5 years of therapy. There was no difference in effectiveness. Oh. And the newer ones are 10 times the out of pocket price (an average of $468/year vs $5,224/year). Which is considerable considering 1 in 4 insulin-users report "rationing" their insulin for cost reasons. 90% of people on insulin take the newer insulin analogs because that's what's on the guidelines.
Pharmaceutical companies have all the data on their drugs, which they don't share and which they alone interpret. It took 4 years of near-daily pestering for Cochrane Reviews (a major independent reviewer) to get a copy of the data for the drug tamflu. When they got it, they found that in 77 trials, the only thing it consistently did was decrease the symptomatic time from an average of 7 days to an average of 6.3 days, even though the company was marketing it under claims that it reduced complications and hospitalizations- something none of the trials showed.
You have to treat 140 people who have not had a heart attack or stroke with statins (cholesterol-lowering medicines) for 5 years in order to prevent 1 single non-fatal heart attack or stroke. There is no difference in death rates from cardiovascular causes between statin-users and non-statin-users who have not had a heart attack or stroke. You have to treat 30 people who have had a heart attack or stroke to prevent one heart attack or stroke. You have to treat 80 to prevent a death.
According to a very large, independent (non-pharmaceutical industry) study called the ACCORD study, people with type 2 diabetes actually had significantly worse cardiovascular outcomes if their average blood sugar was kept in a "normal" (non-diabetic range) (under 125) vs a somewhat higher range (150-180). So significant were these findings that they ended the study early because too many people in the "normal" range were dying.
Omeprazole and Esomeprazole are technically the same drug that work exactly the same way and exactly as well when given at the same dose. The only thing that makes esomeprazole any better is that it is given at a higher dose. And it's way, way more expensive.
59 notes
·
View notes
Text
Pre-diabetes is a bs term, pre-obesity is a bs term.
There isn’t any ”pre” for conditions. You aren’t ”a pre-cancer patient” if you are a heavy smoker with no cancer, and you aren’t ”pre” any condition, even though you know there’s a good possibility that you’ll inherit a certain condition later in life because you are genetically predisposed to it.
There is no pre-obesity because not every fat person will get “obese”, aka very fat (not that there’s anything wrong with being ”obese”/very fat either. My BMI is considered ”obese” for my age). Unlike what thin people often seem to think, a lot of fat people have a certain weight after which our weight gain will naturally stop or slow down. You can observe this happening when you look at your fat relatives: e.g your fat aunt most likely isn’t adding on a lot of weight anymore after a certain age.
The term ”pre-obesity” works as a way to justify why we fat people deserve to be shamed or why we deserve to get sh*t care by healthcare professionals. It gives an excuse for treating smaller fat people like shit, even though there’s a lot of contradicting research on the health effects of being a small fat (”overweight”), some even stating that ”overweight” individuals live longer than their thin counterparts. And regardless, the line between ”overweight” and thin was drawn on water and changed over time: there is no reason why we define BMI over 25 as overweight, besides the fact that the number 25 was easy to remember (and BMI itself isn’t even accurate).
There isn’t pre-diabetes, because that’s a stupid fear-mongering term used by health gurus on the internet. I would be considered ”pre-diabetic” by internet graphs that state certain blood glucose levels, and HDL and LDL cholesterol levels to be pre-diabetic.
Despite this, my blood results were considered to be in the normal range, and later (after I expressed concern for my blood tests results due to those stupid ”signs of pre-diabetes” graphs on the internet) a nurse told me that if my blood results had been a sign of me getting diabetes soon, the doctor(s) who analysed my blood tests would have told me that.
Anyway, have a lovely day all!
#fat liberation#anti fatphobia#fat acceptance#fat is not a bad word#anti fat bias#fat positive#fat positivity#being fat#fat is beautiful#fatphobia#end fatphobia#fat pride#fat activist#fat activism#fat person#fat people
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
I just need to celebrate a little in a public forum...
I started taking ozempic on Saturday of last week. I have diabetes, insulin resistant pcos, and some other issues. My current diabetes medicine wasn't really doing anything for me anymore. My cholesterol was up. I was worried about my heart and my liver. I saw the studies that show the GLP-1 meds can help your health outcomes in those areas as well as treat the insulin resistance and beetus. So I asked my doctor about going on it and she wrote me a prescription.
I was really scared because I've heard horror stories about people feeling deathly ill on this stuff, being constipated, throwing up endlessly, and other things.
I had a low level of nausea the first couple days after my shot but sipping water made it go away. And for the first time in my life, I feel full after eating!
But more than that, for the first time since getting diagnosed with diabetes, my blood sugar levels are in a normal healthy range. Not healthy for a diabetic, but for a non- diabetic! After watching my numbers go up and up and up no matter how hard I tried for years, seeing them down made me cry happy tears.
This medicine might save my life. Do you know what a powerful feeling that is?!
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Cholesterol
Here get detailed info on: Cholesterol Levels. Cholesterol Normal Range. Cholesterol Symptoms. Cholesterol Causes. Symptoms of High Cholesterol in Females… from Rajashree Gadgil… the best nutritionist in Thane & the founder of TruWellth Integrative Health Center… the best nutrition center in Thane, Mumbai.
#Cholesterol Levels#Cholesterol Normal Range#How to Reduce Cholesterol#Cholesterol Foods#Cholesterol Test#HDL Cholesterol#Cholesterol Levels by Age Chart#Symptoms of High Cholesterol in Females#Cholesterol Symptoms#Cholesterol Causes
0 notes
Text
Well. Fuck. My very first therapist might have been right when she was like “mmm… I think you have Clinically Diagnosable Issues with food, weight, and body image” and I was like “lol no let’s talk about how depressed I am, I don’t have issues with food lol”
(She was also right about Q being abusive when I was in denial about that too, so… shit)
I’ve only been like 50% serious when I was like “lol orthorexia feels like it fits” but given how much of my day it ruins when I have to get weighed and I no longer weigh 140 lbs, or how personally I take it when I’m told my blood pressure is slightly high (I was at 122/86 on Thursday, which is SO SLIGHTLY above the high normal range, but I was already feeling Attacked that I Had To Remember) or my cholesterol is slightly high (again, last time it was measured it was like two points above high normal) or even (ffs) when I’ve gotten random UTIs that don’t have a clear origin
So there’s CLEARLY a lot of Anxiety there at the very least, coupled with how much it also ruined my day when I was trying to alleviate some of the anxiety (or prove it was right and I was Very Bad) by using myfitnesspal to log my food, no matter how much I tried to ignore or adjust the calories to make it not yell at me
Plus all of the RULES I make for myself (today I had ice cream for part of my lunch and poptarts for breakfast, therefore no sweets for the rest of the day and maybe not tomorrow either) around food. Plus how you know, the only people who have ever seen fit to comment on how my body looks/how fat I am/how I’m going to eat myself into diabetes one day are the two abusive exes and my mother, NONE of whom are good for my mental health in the first place for various other reasons… no fucking wonder when I finally stood up for myself at the drs office last week and said “no thanks I don’t want to be weighed at all” I burst into tears when the med assistant was like “well… we NEED to” and “[Dr] really wants us to… I’ll talk to her but you’ll probably need to get on the scale”. No wonder my stomach churns when scone talks about how he’s allowed certain amounts of carbs during the day and is gleeful about how many calories he burns during exercise and how much weight he’s lost (because wtf is wrong with me why can’t /i/ be that disciplined and drop the weight I want to get rid of to not have it hanging over my head and be presumed to be in fine physical condition)
ANYWAY!!! Time to go home for dinner and make some quesadillas and refried beans (fat, minimal carbs, protein, fiber, vegetables)!! Why must we introspect and come to conclusions about our beliefs about ourselves!!! God!!!
#ironically the gym makes me feel better no matter what especially now that I’m not using cardio machines that track calories#on a regular basis#I just get to see how strong I am#regardless of how I look in the mirror#or on the elliptical I can see how close I am to my fastest mile time (9 min)#especially when it’s been A While#or just ‘haha I am a persistence predator look how long I can ellipt’
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
My homocysteine is high but my B12 is normal? And I'm on lithium for bipolar which should lower it a bit.
And my LDL cholesterol is high when I can only eat like 600 calories on a good day??
And my glucose was normal despite my not having been able to eat anything for 24 hours at that point.
And my bilirubin keeps going high and then being normal as soon as they try to do further tests on it. Same with my phosphate! The whole reason for this panel was because my phosphate was high and now it's fine?!
This is why I don't bother medicating things unless they get severely out of range. My body doesn't know what the fuck is going on.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
An Overview of Conditions Treated by Cardiologists
Cardiology is a branch of medicine that deals with disorders of the heart and the cardiovascular system. The field includes medical diagnosis and treatment of congenital heart defects, coronary artery disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, and electrophysiology. A congenital heart defect may occur when the heart or one of its associated blood vessels fails to develop normally before birth. The spectrum of these defects ranges from mild to severe with some children not requiring treatment while others require multiple surgeries to correct. Coronary artery disease is the most common heart disease and accounts for 1 in every 4 deaths globally. It is due to narrowing or blockage of the blood vessels that supply the heart with blood and oxygen, usually due to cholesterol deposits. Heart failure is the inability of the heart to pump enough blood to meet the needs of the body. This may to be due to weakness of the heart muscle, or if the heart is unable to fill properly. Conditions such as coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, inflammation of the heart and abnormalities of the heart valves may cause heart failure. Valvular heart disease may affect one or more of the four valves of the heart, which normally keep blood flowing properly through the heart. Treatment for narrowed or leaking valves may be medical, surgical or catheter based. Electrophysiology focuses on the electrical system of the heart, disturbances of which may result in heart rhythm abnormalities. These may include irregular, slow or rapid heartbeats. Treatment may include drugs, implantable devices or catheter ablation, where tissue causing the problem is destroyed. Symptoms of a heart problem may include chest pain, abnormal shortness of breath, dizziness, blackout, palpitation, cough and swelling of the legs. These should prompt referral to a cardiologist if a cardiac cause is suspected.
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
I read those replies about risks of HRT, and it's interesting how one of those studies says "we actually need to study this more", but that person drew a conclusion that "HRT is definitely causing this".
It is annoying. Cofounding factors are a real tricky bit in regards to studies and that person just... Imagine they can know more of them than researchers.
It's in the notes of this post:
Even I kinda go rough when I say "yeah T raises risk for CVD" considering that, as the study says, trans men are smoking more, exercising less, having more anxiety etc than the general population. And despite the rising risks for CVD, mortality stays the same.
I agree there is still a lot we don't know about HRT, I agree we should research it more. Better yet, design specific meds for us to have that are perfectly attuned to our needs. For example, now I'm at almost a full vial of T every four weeks, (0.9ml out of 1ml, it decreased with my weight), so I don't throw away that much. But at one point I was at 0.5ml every two weeks, meaning I was throwing away half a vial every two weeks, aka a complete vial every month. It was crushing me because there are shortage of those meds and I hate throwing away stuff. Had there been a specific med tailored to specific trans needs, that wouldn't have happened.
But to claim that, because the specific med wasn't approved for, specifically, trans people it means it's dangerous and that we shouldn't use it.... Is just false. We have no evidence of that, we have even less evidence that it would outweigh the benefits. That person is just taking a stance that every med used off label should just have a 30 years cohort of test to decide whether it should be used, independently of whether the people who use it really need it or not. Which, even if it were to happen, would probably not even let pharmaceutical companies take the steps to actually make a med for us because we don't bring them enough money for it.
Doctors are also not usually just morons playing with molecules, they engage their responsibility using those meds and therefore make sure it's used well, they are experts in those domains. In my country at least, if you're not an endocrinologist, a gynecologist or a few other specific specialties dealing with hormones, you can't prescribe HRT. It does mean that yes, blood tests every 6 months are important, but like, if something really bad was happening to my body, we'd know. That's also how we realized that I had a fatty liver, which led me to eat better, which led me to have healthier habits in regards to food. So like... I guess T saved my liver in my case, as it has absolutely 0 symptoms before it's too late (the liver is a stealth bastard).
And again, I could go on and on about antidepressants and antipsychotics. I wouldn't advise anyone to stop them or anything, I think sometimes they outweigh the risks, but I personally had disastrous side effects from antipsychotics (taken to treat depression and anxiety, which is not even for that normally so yeah talk about off label I think that's a bigger issue, but i was at a mental hospital and pressured to take them and all) which led to hypothyroidism and prolactin level issues for me. Those side effects are studied and known to belong to antipsychotics, and little do you know when I stopped (after suffering from massive insomnias and bad feelings, it was a real shit med for me) it vanished.
I don't understand why HRT is the main issue when it's about such a tiny number of people, hasn't shown any bad metabolic side effects (except maybe like raising bad cholesterol but it doesn't mean much, it can still very much be in normal range, i still have normal range for ex), and hasn't had any evidence of shortening lives so far. If it ever changes, then I'll change my opinion, but I really don't think we'll find in ten years that T caused people to die, every expert on the issue argues that it's probably safe.
I think it's saner to argue that, even if you have no issue whatsoever, it's important to exercise, eat well, socialize, and avoid drinking and smoking. That advice is for every single person and it will save lives, way more than stopping T will ever do.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
DOES WATER FASTING HELP YOU LOSE WEIGHT?
In recent years, water fasting has emerged as a popular method among those seeking to lose weight quickly. Unlike other diet plans that restrict calories or certain types of food, water fasting requires individuals to consume only water for a specific period, which can range from 24 hours to several days. Proponents of water fasting claim it not only aids in rapid weight loss but also offers detoxification benefits and improves metabolic health. But what does science say about these claims, and is water fasting a safe and effective way to lose weight? Let's dive into the evidence.
Understanding Water Fasting
Water fasting is a type of fast that involves abstaining from all food and beverages except water. The duration of a water fast can vary widely, with some lasting for a day and others extending up to 40 days, although prolonged fasts should only be undertaken under medical supervision. The primary goal of water fasting is to induce a state of ketosis, where the body begins to burn fat for energy in the absence of glucose from food. This process can lead to rapid weight loss, as the body consumes its fat stores to sustain itself.
The Weight Loss Mechanism
Short-Term Weight Loss
Initially, water fasting can lead to significant weight loss, much of which is water weight. When you stop eating food, your body uses up its glucose reserves stored in the liver and muscles. Each gram of glycogen (stored glucose) is bound to about 3 to 4 grams of water, so as these stores are depleted, the water is also released and expelled from the body, leading to rapid weight loss in the first few days.
Fat Loss and Metabolic Changes
After depleting glycogen stores, the body transitions to burning fat for energy, leading to fat loss over time. This metabolic switch not only contributes to weight loss but may also offer other health benefits, such as improved insulin sensitivity and reduced inflammation. However, the rate of fat loss can slow down after the initial phase, as the body adapts to the fast.
Health Benefits and Risks
Potential Benefits
Detoxification: Fasting proponents argue that abstaining from food allows the body's digestive system to rest and detoxify. However, the body is naturally equipped with organs like the liver and kidneys that are effective at removing toxins without the need for fasting.
Improved Metabolic Health: Some research suggests that fasting can improve markers of metabolic health, including blood sugar levels and cholesterol profiles, though more studies are needed to confirm these effects.
Risks and Considerations
Nutrient Deficiencies: Prolonged water fasting can lead to nutrient deficiencies, as the body is deprived of essential vitamins and minerals found in food.
Muscle Loss: While the body primarily burns fat for energy during a fast, it may also break down muscle tissue for protein, especially during longer fasts.
Potential for Weight Regain: Once normal eating resumes, there's a risk of regaining the lost weight, particularly if healthy eating habits are not adopted.
Safety and Precautions
Water fasting is not suitable for everyone. Individuals with certain health conditions, such as diabetes, or those who are pregnant or breastfeeding, should avoid fasting. Before embarking on a water fast, it's crucial to consult with a healthcare provider, especially for fasts lasting longer than 24 hours. It's also important to ease back into eating gradually after the fast to avoid refeeding syndrome, a potentially fatal condition caused by the rapid reintroduction of food after a period of malnutrition.
Conclusion
Water fasting can lead to rapid weight loss, primarily from water weight and fat loss. However, it also carries risks and may not be a sustainable weight loss method in the long term. While there are potential health benefits, they must be weighed against the risks of nutrient deficiencies and possible muscle loss. Ultimately, adopting a balanced diet and regular physical activity is the most effective and safe strategy for long-term weight management and overall health.
#usascriphelpersofficial#lose weight fast#weight loss journey#weight loss#weight management#water fasting#weight loss treatment#weight loss diet#diet plan#diet
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Trump, on Biden’s 81st birthday, releases doctor’s note that says he’s in ‘excellent’ health
NEW YORK (AP) — GOP front-runner Donald Trump marked President Joe Biden ‘s 81st birthday on Monday by releasing a letter from his physician that reports the former president is in “excellent” physical and mental health.
The letter posted on Trump’s social media platform contained no details to support its claims — measures like weight, blood pressure and cholesterol levels, or the results of any test. Dr. Bruce A. Aronwald, a New Jersey physician who says he has been Trump’s doctor since 2021 and most recently examined him in September, reported that Trump’s “physical exams were well within the normal range and his cognitive exams were exceptional.”
He added that Trump’s most recent lab results were “even more favorable than prior testing on some of the most significant parameters” thanks to recent weight loss he credited to “improved diet and continued daily physical exercise, while maintaining a rigorous schedule.”
Source: JILL COLVIN AP November 20, 2023
Trump, on Biden's 81st birthday, releases doctor's note that says he's in 'excellent' health | AP News
6 notes
·
View notes