#Calculations

[puffycinnabunny]

Messy

[staticymaticyyourlifeisatravesty]

Age of which the Primarchs Died/Warp Fucked/Demon Prince'd

Horus: 222 years (died by the Emperor)

Leman Russ: 419 years (Fucked off into Warp knows where)

[REDACTED]

Ferrus Manus: 213 years (killed by Fulgrim)

Fulgrim: 11,207 years old (Slaanesh Daemon prince)

Vulkan: 11,207 years old (Or so, Perpetual, probs still alive)

Rogal Dorn: Either 1,197 (dead) or 11,207 (Alive)

Roboute Guilliman: 329 years old (died) Still around the same age or so considering he was revived.

Magnus the Red: 11,207 years old (Tzeentch Daemon Prince)

Sanguinius: 222 years old (Killed by Horus)

Lion El'Johnson: 11,207 years old (only one who didn't die, just kinda went into dormancy)

Perturabo: 11,207 years old (Human??? Or at least not mutated)

Mortarion: 11,207 years old (Nurgle Daemon Prince)

Lorgar: 11,207 years old (Chaos undivided)

Jaghatia Khan: 292 or 11,207, (Hunting Drukhari in the webway)

Konrad Curze: 223 years old (Assassinated)

Angron: 11,207 years old (Khorne Daemon Prince)

Corvus Corax: 11,207 years old (Hunting Logar and warp fucked)

[REDACTED]

Alpharius/Omegon: 11,207 years old (Chaos Undivided, or just traitor)

So some died pretty young by Astartes standards, pretty sure Vulkan's death is inaccurate and grossly exaggerated, and the rest makes sense. Unless you want to get into the weirdness that is the implications of the Black rage literally being the impure half of Sanguinius soul quite literally possessing his sons, and the Sanguinor being the pure parts. In Which case, technically dead; technically fucking up shit despite being dead.

Also here's where you can find the ages Where they were found

[joker00m]

I got bored So i decided to caculate how tall miss circle from fundamental paper education is

In this shot we can See her holding a piece of paper. Which i asumed is in letter format since its the most common one, which is 8.5 × 11 inches which luckly is similar sized to her head meanings that her head is 8'5 inches in height.

And using that we can caculate that in this shot miss circle is 12 heads tall which is 102 inches tall which is 8,5 feet tall

I don't know how she fits in any doorways (my calculations might be off and thats why lol)

[autisticsupervillain]

FTF Calculations: The Destruction of Prospit's Moon

Jack Noir cuts the chain of Prospit, causing its moon to crash down to the battlefield. Jade throws John out of the way of the impact, getting obliterated in the process, while John survives the explosion afterwards unharmed.

Impact

The moon has a total area of 21.9 billion cubic km. Gold weighs roughly 19320 kg per cubic meter. That's a total weight of 423108000000000000000000 kg.

It takes 6 seconds for the moon to travel the distance between the two shots shown above. The moon has a diameter of 3,475 km and 36 pixels. The distance traveled is 80 pixels or 7722222.222 meters. That's a speed of 1287037.037 m/s and a kinetic energy of 83 Yottatons (Large Planet Level)

Vaporization

Prospit's moon is completely vaporized on impact.

We'll need to multiply the mass by the specific heat capacity and the change in temperature. We already have the mass, specific heat capacity of gold is 130 j/kg, and, assuming room temperature, the change is roughly 3836°C due to the boiling point of gold. Finally, gold vaporizes at 1675127 j/kg.

Punching all of that into this calculator:

Gets us 193 Exatons (Moon Level)

Explosion

Prospit's diameter is still 3,575 km and 36 pixels. The explosion's diameter is roughly 293 pixels or 28282638.89 meters. Divide to get the radius, then punch the numbers into the formula R^3 x (1,655.6 x (( 2,750 + 273.15) - (16 + 273.15))) where R = the radius to get the results in tons of TNT.

The results are 102 Ninatons (Dwarf Star Level)

Jade Yeet

Jade chucks John from the middle of the crater out towards its edge just before impact. I'll assume John has the averages height and weight of 1.56 meters and 45 kg. The distance between the epicenter of the crater and just outside its edge is 52 pixels or 5019444.444 meters.

0,5 * TargetMass * ( ( ( ( 2 * Gravity * ( TargetHeight / 2 ) ) ^ 0,5 ) / TargetHeight * Distance ) ^ 2 )

858.8 Kilotons (Large Town Level)

Kinetic Energy Yeet

John flies 5019444.444 meters in 4 seconds.

45 kg traveling at 1003888.8888000001 m/s gets us 5.5 Kilotons (Small Town Level+)

Results

The Beta Kids should scale to the explosion. It took the combination of the impact, heat, and explosion to obliterate Jade's dreamself and she was the last player to get into the game and start working her way up the Echeladder. John, meanwhile, has been gaining levels for awhile and should be stronger than Jade at this point, plus he withstood the explosion by itself completely unharmed.

Also, both would scale to the yeeting, being both yeeter and yeetee respectively would require them to output and survive those levels of energy. Not that it particularly matters.... Town Level is gonna make a difference when the rest of the verse is planetary at a low end.

More consistency for Star Level Homestuck low tiers!

[majingojira]

What if Godzilla was Human-Sized?

So, I figured I'd do some fun math and figure out how Dangerous Godzilla would be if he were the size of a person.

For this, we are going to use the Showa Godzilla v2 (1955-1975), appearing in the most Godzilla films of any individual Godzilla. Some would say he's the weakest of them just by breath weapon power and weight, but we'll see how we go here.

Godzilla is going to be shrunk from 50m to 2m. That means he's 1/25th his size and 1/15625th his weight. Showa Godzilla weighs 20,000 metric tons. So, 20,000/15625 is 1.28 metric tons. Imagine a 2m tall with a tail 4.2m tall. For those of you on the Imperial Units. That means he weighs 2,821.917 pounds (1.26 imperial tons), stands 6ft 6.7 inches tall, and has a tail length of 13ft 9 inches. He had enough power to pick up and throw King Ghidorah, which is 150% his own eight.

So, he'd be strong enough to lift and throw almost 2 tons.

Now we get to the hard part: The Breath Weapon. Godzilla's breath weapon is generally measured in degrees Celsius, with his original breath weapon being 100,000 degrees Celsius. Which doesn't really help us. So, assuming that, based on a little bit in Son of Godzilla, Godzilla's atomic breath can vaporize a 10m by 10m by 1m area of water with a blast of his breath, that means it has 2,260,000,000 joules or 2.26 Gigajoules.

That's .537765 tons of TNT. 1/25th of that is 0.021 Tons, or 21kg/46lbs.

So, Showa Godzilla's heat beam would hit with the power of about a 50-pound bomb! And while that does make a good explosion, since it's a direct energy weapon, the blast is worse because it's more concentrated, so instead of blowing up a car:

It would burn through a car.

Thankfully, this also applies to how much it would take to hurt Godzilla at that size (because Godzilla's own breath weapon matched Mecha-Godzilla's Space Beam, which took several hits to draw blood from Godzilla, though each blow did hurt him).

But he did heal from arterial ruptures in seconds. So, yeah, hurting Godzilla is going to be very, very hard.

Next comes speed, which is a bit wonky.

Because you can calculate speed based on the proportions of the body, Godzilla's movement speed doesn't really change much when you size him around given the proportions we have for him are... flattening.

I did some numbers based on his trackway(s) and his dimensions. He's generally walking at 4mph, which is the upper end of a human's walking speed. So, at a run, he's probably pulling 20mph or so.

And he's always been a better swimmer than any human thanks to that tail. He's considered to be faster in water than on land. So, between that and looking at various scenes of him swimming, I'd peg his water speed to about 25 knots, which is about half the speed of a motorboat.

He can "long jump" over 4 times his body length (so, at a smaller size, 8m (26ft) might be in order -- which approaches the world records of 8.9m), and his high jump might be in similar 'olympian' levels compared to humans (2.44/8ft). He has hit objects going at least over 110mph in combat, which is faster than any fastball ever thrown (going by on-screen speed and not spec speed).

The Guinness World record for 'fastest punch' is only 45mph.

In short, a Man-sized Godzilla would be absolutely terrifying! Very few other characters in horror could keep up with them!

[croquis-el]

At some point, I became curious about how many generations of the Naruhodo family separate the first (Ryunosuke) and last (Ryuichi) lawyers of this family. And whether Ryu Jr. could have seen his ancestor in person.

So I decided to do some calculations and share my thoughts with you.

Disclaimer: everything written below is subjective and is based on generally known information about the characters. The calculations are approximate and may be inaccurate.

The first thing you can calculate is how much time passed from the birth of Ryunosuke to the birth of Ryuichi.

Ryunosuke Naruhodo is 23 years old at the time of his appearance in the game.

The action begins in 1901, which means his year of birth is 1878 (Meiji 11)

Ryuichi Naruhodo turned 24 on August 3, 2016 (by long calculations and comparison of all dates, his birthday is somewhere between April and early August - if you want, I will write about this in detail later)

And so the year of his birth is most likely 1992 (Heisei 4)

Then simple math 1992-1878 = 114 years passed between the birth of our heroes

So, it is unlikely that our contemporary saw his ancestor (which is basically confirmed by Ryuichi's words in the Special Court in the TGAA DLC)

The next question is - how many generations separate them?

Now we need to calculate the approximate years of birth of parents, grandparents, etc.

I will rely on a well-known and accessible example of a parent in the game - Shin Mitsurugi (Gregory Edgeworth), because the age when people start a family can be very different from what we are used to.

I believe that the ages of Mitsurugi and Naruhodo's parents are not very different, since their children were born in the same year

In December 2000, Mitsurugi's father was "already 34" years old, and from the DL-6 case materials we learn that on December 28, 2001, he was 35 years old. This means that his year of birth is most likely 1966.

This means that Naruhodo's father's year of birth is approximately the same (Showa 41) (and he inherited his surname from his father, because Article 750 of the Civil Code still exists in Japan). And it has existed since 1896, just like this article.

And so little Ryu was born when his father was 26-27 years old

Now grandfather Naruhodo

It is logical to assume that his grandfather is a child born before the Second World War

Let's take this into account and take the age of 27-30 years, which means grandfather Naruhodo was born around 1936-1939 (Showa 11-14)

We got to the great-grandfather (this is not Ryunosuke, because he would have already been almost 60 years old)

Again we take the average age of 27-30 years and get the years of birth 1906-1909 (Meiji 39-42)

And here we finally get to Ryunosuke Naruhodo - the great ancestor

It turns out that he is Ryuichi's great-great-grandfather and they are separated by 4 generations of the famous family

___________________________________________

Everything that is said above is done out of curiosity and for fun, I do not claim that my calculations and assumptions are correct.

To prevent unnecessary questions I will add that I am not a supporter of the theory about moving to another country and changing the surname. (The situation in the world at the beginning of the 20th century was extremely difficult and unstable, add to this the strained relations between countries. Therefore - unlikely.).

[english-lessons-bolzano]

Names for the number 0 in English

"Zero" is the usual name for the number 0 in English. In British English "nought" is also used and in American English "naught" is used occasionally for zero, but (as with British English) "naught" is more often used as an archaic word for nothing. "Nil", "love", and "duck" are used by different sports for scores of zero.

There is a need to maintain an explicit distinction between digit zero and letter O,[a] which, because they are both usually represented in English orthography (and indeed most orthographies that use Latin script and Arabic numerals) with a simple circle or oval, have a centuries-long history of being frequently conflated. However, in spoken English, the number 0 is often read as the letter "o" ("oh"). For example, when dictating a telephone number, the series of digits "1070" may be spoken as "one zero seven zero" or as "one oh seven oh", even though the letter "O" on the telephone keypad in fact corresponds to the digit 6.

In certain contexts, zero and nothing are interchangeable, as is "null". Sporting terms are sometimes used as slang terms for zero, as are "nada", "zilch" and "zip".

Zero" and "cipher"

"Zero" and "cipher" are both names for the number 0, but the use of "cipher" for the number is rare and only used in very formal literary English today (with "cipher" more often referring to cryptographic cyphers). The terms are doublets, which means they have entered the language through different routes but have the same etymological root, which is the Arabic "صفر" (which transliterates as "sifr"). Via Italian this became "zefiro" and thence "zero" in modern English, Portuguese, French, Catalan, Romanian and Italian ("cero" in Spanish). But via Spanish it became "cifra" and thence "cifre" in Old French, "cifră" in Romanian and "cipher" in modern English (and "chiffre" in modern French).

"Zero" is more commonly used in mathematics and science, whereas "cipher" is used only in a literary style. Both also have other connotations. One may refer to a person as being a "social cipher", but would name them "Mr. Zero", for example.

In his discussion of "naught" and "nought" in Modern English Usage, H. W. Fowler uses "cipher" to name the number 0.

O" ("oh")

In spoken English, the number 0 is often read as the letter "o", often spelled oh. This is especially the case when the digit occurs within a list of other digits. While one might say that "a million is expressed in base ten as a one followed by six zeroes", the series of digits "1070" can be read as "one zero seven zero", or "one oh seven oh". This is particularly true of telephone numbers (for example 867-5309, which can be said as "eight-six-seven-five-three-oh-nine"). Another example is James Bond's designation, 007, which is always read as "double-o seven", not "double-zero seven", "zero-zero seven", or "o o seven".

The letter "o" ("oh") is also used in spoken English as the name of the number 0 when saying times in the 24-hour clock, particularly in English used by both British and American military forces. Thus 16:05 is "sixteen oh five", and 08:30 is "oh eight thirty".

The use of O as a number can lead to confusion as in the ABO blood group system. Blood can either contain antigen A (type A), antigen B (type B), both (type AB) or none (type O). Since the "O" signifies the lack of antigens, it could be more meaningful to English-speakers for it to represent the number "oh" (zero). However, "blood type O" is properly written with a letter O and not with a number 0.

In sport, the number 0 can have different names depending on the sport in question and the nationality of the speaker.

"Nil" in British sports

Many sports that originated in the UK use the word "nil" for 0. Thus, a 3-0 score in a football match would be read as "three-nil".[1] Nil is derived from the Latin word "nihil", meaning "nothing", and often occurs in formal contexts outside of sport, including technical jargon (e.g. "nil by mouth") and voting results.

It is used infrequently in U.S. English, although it has become common in soccer broadcasts.

"Nothing" and "oh" in American sports

edit

In American sports, the term "nothing" is often employed instead of zero. Thus, a 3-0 score in a baseball game would be read as "three-nothing" or "three to nothing". When talking about a team's record in the standings, the term "oh" is generally used; a 3-0 record would be read as "three and oh".

In cricket, a team's score might read 50/0, meaning the team has scored fifty runs and no batter is out. It is read as "fifty for no wicket" or "fifty for none".

Similarly, a bowler's analysis might read 0-50, meaning he has conceded 50 runs without taking a wicket. It is read as "no wicket for fifty" or "none for fifty".

A batsman who is out without scoring is said to have scored "a duck", but "duck" is used somewhat informally compared to the other terms listed in this section. It is also always accompanied by an article and thus is not a true synonym for "zero": a batter scores "a duck" rather than "duck".

A name related to the "duck egg" in cricket is the "goose egg" in baseball, a name traced back to an 1886 article in The New York Times, where the journalist states that "the New York players presented the Boston men with nine unpalatable goose eggs", i.e., nine scoreless innings.

"Love" and "bagel" in tennis

In tennis, the word "love" is used to replace 0 to refer to points, sets and matches. If the score during a game is 30-0, it is read as "thirty-love". Similarly, 3-0 would be read as "three-love" if referring to the score during a tiebreak, the games won during a set, or the sets won during a match. The term was adopted by many other racquet sports.

There is no definitive origin for the usage. It first occurred in English, is of comparatively recent origin, and is not used in other languages. The most commonly believed hypothesis is that it is derived from English speakers mis-hearing the French l'œuf ("the egg"), which was the name for a score of zero used in French because the symbol for a zero used on the scoreboard was an elliptical zero symbol, which visually resembled an egg.

Although the use of "duck" in cricket can be said to provide tangential evidence, the l'œuf hypothesis has several problems, not the least of which is that in court tennis the score was not placed upon a scoreboard. There is also scant evidence that the French ever used l'œuf as the name for a zero score in the first place. (Jacob Bernoulli, for example, in his Letter to a Friend, used à but to describe the initial zero–zero score in court tennis, which in English is "love-all".) Some alternative hypotheses have similar problems. For example, the assertion that "love" comes from the Scots word "luff", meaning "nothing", falls at the first hurdle, because there is no authoritative evidence that there has ever been any such word in Scots in the first place.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first use of the word "love" in English to mean "zero" was to define how a game was to be played, rather than the score in the game itself. Gambling games could be played for stakes (money) or "for love (of the game)", i.e., for zero stakes. The first such recorded usage quoted in the OED was in 1678. The shift in meaning from "zero stakes" to "zero score" is not an enormous conceptual leap, and the first recorded usage of the word "love" to mean "no score" is by Hoyle in 1742.

In recent years, a set won 6-0 ("six-love") has been described as a bagel, again a reference to the resemblance of the zero to the foodstuff. It was popularised by American announcer Bud Collins.

Null

In certain contexts, zero and nothing are interchangeable, as is "null". However, in mathematics and many scientific disciplines, a distinction is made (see null). The number 0 is represented by zero while null is a representation of an empty set {}. Hence in computer science a zero represents the outcome of a mathematical computation such as 2−2, while null is used for an undefined state (for example, a memory location that has not been explicitly initialised).

In English, "nought" and "naught" mean zero or nothingness, whereas "ought" and "aught" (the former in its noun sense) strictly speaking mean "all" or "anything", and are not names for the number 0. Nevertheless, they are sometimes used as such in American English; for example, "aught" as a placeholder for zero in the pronunciation of calendar year numbers. That practice is then also reapplied in the pronunciation of derived terms, such as when the rifle caliber .30-06 Springfield (introduced in 1906) is accordingly referred to by the name "thirty-aught-six".

The words "nought" and "naught" are spelling variants. They are, according to H. W. Fowler, not a modern accident as might be thought, but have descended that way from Old English. There is a distinction in British English between the two, but it is not one that is universally recognized. This distinction is that "nought" is primarily used in a literal arithmetic sense, where the number 0 is straightforwardly meant, whereas "naught" is used in poetical and rhetorical senses, where "nothing" could equally well be substituted. So the name of the board game is "noughts & crosses", whereas the rhetorical phrases are "bring to naught", "set at naught", and "availeth naught". The Reader's Digest Right Word at the Right Time labels "naught" as "old-fashioned".

Whilst British English makes this distinction, in American English, the spelling "naught" is preferred for both the literal and rhetorical/poetic senses.

"Naught" and "nought" come from the Old English "nāwiht" and "nōwiht", respectively, both of which mean "nothing". They are compounds of no- ("no") and wiht ("thing").

The words "aught" and "ought" (the latter in its noun sense) similarly come from Old English "āwiht" and "ōwiht", which are similarly compounds of a ("ever") and wiht. Their meanings are opposites to "naught" and "nought"—they mean "anything" or "all". (Fowler notes that "aught" is an archaism, and that "all" is now used in phrases such as "for all (that) I know", where once they would have been "for aught (that) I know".)

However, "aught" and "ought" are also sometimes used as names for 0, in contradiction of their strict meanings. The reason for this is a rebracketing, whereby "a nought" and "a naught" have been misheard as "an ought" and "an aught".

sometimes used as names for 0, in contradiction of their strict meanings. The reason for this is a rebracketing, whereby "a nought" and "a naught" have been misheard as "an ought" and "an aught".

Samuel Johnson thought that since "aught" was generally used for "anything" in preference to "ought", so also "naught" should be used for "nothing" in preference to "nought". However, he observed that "custom has irreversibly prevailed in using 'naught' for 'bad' and 'nought' for 'nothing'". Whilst this distinction existed in his time, in modern English, as observed by Fowler and The Reader's Digest above, it does not exist today. However, the sense of "naught" meaning "bad" is still preserved in the word "naughty", which is simply the noun "naught" plus the adjectival suffix "-y". This has never been spelled "noughty".

The words "owt" and "nowt" are used in Northern English. For example, if tha does owt for nowt do it for thysen: if you do something for nothing do it for yourself.

The word aught continues in use for 0 in a series of one or more for sizes larger than 1. For American Wire Gauge, the largest gauges are written 1/0, 2/0, 3/0, and 4/0 and pronounced "one aught", "two aught", etc. Shot pellet diameters 0, 00, and 000 are pronounced "single aught", "double aught", and "triple aught". Decade names with a leading zero (e.g., 1900 to 1909) were pronounced as "aught" or "nought". This leads to the year 1904 ('04) being spoken as "[nineteen] aught four" or "[nineteen] nought four". Another acceptable pronunciation is "[nineteen] oh four".

Decade names

See also: Aughts

While "2000s" has been used to describe the decade consisting of the years 2000–2009 in all English speaking countries, there have been some national differences in the usage of other terms.

On January 1, 2000, the BBC listed the noughties (derived from "nought") as a potential moniker for the new decade. This has become a common name for the decade in the U.K.and Australia, as well as some other English-speaking countries. However, it has not become the universal descriptor because, as Canadian novelist Douglas Coupland pointed out early in the decade, "[Noughties] won't work because in America the word 'nought' is never used for zero, never ever".

The American music and lifestyle magazine Wired favoured "Naughties", which they claim was first proposed by the arts collective Foomedia in 1999.However, the term "Naughty Aughties" was suggested as far back as 1975 by Cecil Adams, in his column The Straight Dope.

interchangeable, as is "null". However, in mathematics and many scientific disciplines, a distinction is made (see null). The number 0 is represented by zero while null is a representation of an empty set {}. Hence in computer science a zero represents the outcome of a mathematical computation such as 2−2, while null is used for an undefined state (for example, a memory location that has not been explicitly initialixed).

Slang

Sporting terms (see above) are sometimes used as slang terms for zero, as are "nada", "zilch" and "zip".

"Zilch" is a slang term for zero, and it can also mean "nothing". The origin of the term is unknown.

Silvio Pasqualini Bolzano inglese ripetizioni English insegnante teacher

[shatcey]

A bit culculations (IkeVil)

Update (16/2/25) Added sets with bottles

Don't ask me why, I don't know how my brain works. But I decided to do some calculations.

There are many different sets in the game. We can see some of them all the time. Some only appear during certain events or after completing the route. So it's pretty easy to get confused. I try to combine all the information. To make it easier to understand, I did some calculations. And added the comments after each table.

After completing the route

This is a completely normal logic: the more you spend, the bigger the discount. However, the two top sets are not that much different from each other in terms of discount.

But if dig deeper…

I didn't include the completely useless bottles + romantic/dramatic points in the calculation. I don't see the point in them here on the EN server. It's very easy to find the right answers. And these bottles are lying untouched.

Based on this logic, the second set is the most profitable.

Diamond shops

Web shop

It's not very logical… The most profitable option is not the top one, but the second one. Although the difference is not that big…

But what would the prices be if the cost of 100 crystals were used the other way around?..

Not much difference. In both cases, a little less than half a dollar.

And the comparison

Not much, but there's still a difference. And again… the logic is correct. The more you spend, the more profitable it turns out to be.

Next part require more calculations

Tickets sets (for gacha)

We only know the price of regular tickets because we can buy them at gacha. The price of one ticket is 300 crystals. But the price of other types of tickets remains a mystery. And the developers don't even give us any hints. You just got them for free in any set.

Let's say… only looking at 4⭐ tickets.

The lowest set gives you 2 tickets, and the highest one gives you 10. So the price should be 5 times more. But it's… 4.5 times bigger. Profitable.

The middle set give you 3 tickets, and the highest one gives you 10. So… the price should be 3.33 times bigger. But it's… 3 times bigger. Again, it is profitable.

So… the tendency is correct. The more you buy, the cheaper it is for you. But two cheapest are have no difference. The difference in both the cost and tickets is 1.5 times.

Sets for collection events

Sets with tickets appear ONLY during the lucky story time.

Sets with a limited bottles appear ONLY during the lucky escort time.

But there are sets that you can buy at any time. And there is one set that you can ONLY buy in the first 80 hours after the event starts.

I calculated the number of hearts for the tickets you can get WITHOUT taking into account the avatar/intimacy check, just for reading the chapters. So… You may get more than I calculated.

And it only works if you use these tickets AND bottles ONLY on 2* or 3* lucky times. Keep that in mind.

For some strange reason, the most profitable middle sets. For 4000 and 2500 diamonds.

But anyway… This way, hearts are much cheaper than buying them in a store. In the store, they cost 120 diamonds for 100 hearts.

For some reason, I got the impression that it's more profitable to buy bottles. Let's see what the calculations say. I will add bottle sets later, when they appear at the shop.

Yes, I was right. The most profitable are sets of bottles.

But again… if you use tickets on the final chapter of the route, you get twice as many hearts. So… at some points, ticket sets may be more profitable.

deviders by sweetmelodygraphics

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

🔝 𝕊𝕋𝔸ℝ𝕋 ℙ𝔸𝔾𝔼 🔝

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[abiwaif]

Pretty much me right now...😁

[dimalink]

Conversation +3 and -3 about to jump in green hole

Let`s jump into this red hole and get to know what is it at the top of it?

Let`s do it, but I see before myself a purple triangle and it is turned to 45 degrees.

I am at the time distortion minus 0.5. Calibrate, please, your eye and a measure device. And, good. But, now, I see I green circle. And, what do you see?

I, also, see a green circle. Looks, now, we are at the same timeline and speak about same place. And, this is it, one block of universe. At last, we speak about the same thing!

Let`s do a jump, until everything starts to change! And do that place have a time to speed of light, and all the things, and expanse of substance things? And, what if we suddenly disappear?

Let`s do energetic lighthouses. I set mine at +3, and you set yours at +3. And we will connect it with quantum entanglement. And, in this case, we will never be lost. And drop anchor at this fragment, where we are stay now. In this case, using a rope, energetic way to make a compact pack and to slip back. Let`s calibrate it as a mainspring. And, in this case, if there is nothing there and substance cannot to exist there, then it will be effect of mainspring. And our substance particles jump out with maximum speed +1. So, this way we will do not have a time to self destruction.

And, in this case, will something happen to these spaces?

I am very sorry, but I cannot to know this. Let`s have a hope. That nothing will happens. Let`s for any case if something can to happen. To jump there with accelerated new time coordinate. I, already, has written a Basic program. Right now, I start I calculation with Sintez 2. And you to support calculation with MSX2. Press return and let`s jump!

This information was read from informational surface of a black hole from the galaxy Andromeda. And a calculation machine does not have original cipher for correct decode process. So, machine suggests this variation for original information with accuracy 99.9 precents. This information was very strange and it is exotic. All another data is rather casual for this space segment.

Dima Link is making retro videogames, apps, a little of music, write stories, and some retro more.

WEBSITE: http://www.dimalink.tv-games.ru/home_eng.html ITCHIO: https://dimalink.itch.io/

TUMBLR: https://dimalink.tumblr.com/ BLOGGER: https://dimalinkeng.blogspot.com/ MASTODON: https://mastodon.social/@DimaLink

[onlinesolve]

"Need to calculate matrices quickly and easily? Check out our online matrix calculator! Supports multiple languages. Click the link below! https://onlinesolve.net/en/matrix-calculator/

#Matrix #mathematicsmadeeasy #matriks #mathematics #math #matrix #matrices #matrixcalculations #onlinecalculator

[puffycinnabunny]

Solve for q :)

[jhsharman]

"tube boob"

Funny the school hallway wall remains the same color. The reflection to Dilton's eyeglasses in panel 3 moves from blue tinted to white to clear. They still haven't corrected Archie's opening sentence -- should have a verb, presumably "are", before "in a tube".

[moxalotl0]

$ Price of White Diamond $

I did the math and assuming that Steven is 4 ft tall, her gem would cost 8+ billion dollars. ($814,143,253,696 dollars) You could also create 35 million 1-carrot diamond rings from her gem.

All of this is ignoring the fact that she’s sentient.

(I did this at 3 am)

[autisticsupervillain]

FTF Calculations: Bottomless Pit

The Mystery Shack crew fell down the Bottomless Pit, which as you can see here is Bottomless.

The gang starts falling at 1:20 seconds and "land" about 21:33. So, they fell for about 20:21 total. This would suggest they fell for about 7310078 meters, via this formula (the Bottomless Pit is still on Earth so I'll assume gravity is the same):

Now the weights of the characters aren't confirmed in sny official source that I can find, so I'll assume 202.5 pounds for the average 58 year old man (Stan). He'd be moving at 11969.86 m/s at the time of "impact" and be generating a kinetic energy equivalent to 1.5 Tons of TNT (Building Level)

So, yeah! That's another point in the "Pines are superhuman" pile, given Stan's old man body can take those forces.