#Archie Christening

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

They lied on the Welby once: "no one knows this...just the 3 of us..." Perhaps Welby performed another backyard "blessing" type of Christening 3 days before THIS "SPECTACLE." -LOL

My best guess is that Welby was present in Windsor on Saturday morning (Kate allegedly photographed in blue) then attended the Synod in YORK AFTER the Christening.

The Meghans play so many PR mind games. Who can believe anything they say or do. At Wimbledon she behaved like she was off her face!

People in Windsor were disappointed: "she could have just allowed us to see the baby."

"Today [July 6, 2019] marks Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor’s christening, an intimate ceremony that will take place in the private chapel at Windsor Castle. The service is being conducted by the Archbishop of Canterbury and images, taken by photographer Chris Allerton, will be released later this afternoon. But unlike previous royal christenings, the names of the baby’s godparents will not be announced, with Buckingham Palace describing this choice as "in keeping with [the family's] wishes."

"But Harry and Meghan did release photos taken by photographer Chris Allerton to commemorate the milestone a few hours after the ceremony."

"Chris Allerton, who also photographed Archie’s debut when he was two (2) days old and took pictures at the Sussexes’ wedding..."

"Archie's christening was an intimate affair (roughly 25 people were expected to be there) But today, Harry and Meghan shared new photos of the young royal in honor of his christening. This morning, little Archie was baptized while surrounded by family and close friends. Here's what we know about the ceremony so far."

"Members of the press were not there to capture photos of the christening or the royals going in and out of the church. While all royal christenings are private (for example, they aren't live streamed to the public, and reporters do not attend the actual ceremony), this shift in coverage of the arrivals differs from what the public has seen at recent baptisms..."

"The move is in contrast to the decision by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to let cameras capture their children at their christenings, together with the arrivals of family members and godparents, before holding private services," reporter Roya Nikkah wrote in the Sunday Times.

The Archbishop of Canterbury's name does not appear on the Synod schedule. He does publicly speak during the farewells on Monday afternoon.

https://www.churchofengland.org/about/general-synod/agendas-papers/general-synod-july-2019#na

"The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are overjoyed to share the happiness of this day, and would like to thank everyone around the world for their ongoing support," reads a statement released in honor of the day.

"They feel so fortunate to have enjoyed this special moment with family and Archie’s godparents."

Reminder:

Thursday, July 4th 2019: "Put your hat on"-Lindsay // "smile"- Genevieve [grab your friends arm-Lindsay] Wimbledon Fiasco

Saturday, July 6th 2019 : Release of Christening Photos

Guess who 🧐

"Archie was christened in the private chapel at Windsor Castle, not St. George's Chapel, where Harry and Meghan were married, as was previously rumored."

How could the Archbishop of Canterbury possibly have christened Archificial on July 6th? He was presiding at the General Synod in York that day! 

The Christening picture shows metadata as taken on May 8, 2019.  The same day as Archie doll was introduced to the public and to HM and PP.  Justin Welby was here….

Did he sneak in the christening on this day of May 8, 2019?  When yes christening was supposed to be July 6, 2018😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[jerseydeanne]

"They will stick to and they will suck on these Windsor connections, because it suits them financially and it suits them socially –and frankly, without them what have they got?"

[thetimelordbatgirl]

Apparently Charles toasted Harry and his family at the coronation buffet and its just, “Whether you are...” He’s acting like Harry and his family just disappeared into thin air when in reality, Harry attended the coronation and quickly left to get back to his family as it was Archie’s birthday, something Charles knew but can’t continue to lead the tabloids to trash Harry and Meghan and their kids if he didn’t continue to do this type of shit...

[lgbtqreads]

February 2023 Deal Announcements

Adult Fiction Finalist for the PEN/Hemingway Award and a Lambda Literary Award, and author of BIG FAMILIA Tomas Moniz‘s ALL FRIENDS ARE NECESSARY, set in the Bay Area, following a late-30s bisexual man’s effort to reconnect to the world through misadventures in dating, Peloton, and OnlyFans after his marriage dissolves in the wake of his partner’s loss of a full-term pregnancy, to Evan…

[royalchildreneurope]

News : Archie and Lilibet are now known as Prince Archie of Sussex and Princess Lilibet of Sussex after the official website of The British Royal Family has been updated .

Princess Lilibet of Sussex was christened by the bishop of Los Angeles, the Rev John Taylor in a small and intimate ceremony at their home in Montecito, California, United States -March 8th 2023.

📷 : Misan Harriman.

[hollowed-theory-hall]

In terms of wizarding fashion is it more traditional wizards that are wearing the robes outside of a professional setting? Like are the Weasley kids all wearing wizarding robes around the Burrow or do they don muggle clothing for leisure wear?

I talked a bit about what I think wizarding fashion would look like more or less throughout the decades here.

There is this article from Pottermore as well:

By and large, wizard clothing has remained outside of fashion, although small alterations have been made to such garments as dress robes. Standard wizard clothing comprises plain robes, worn with or without the traditional pointed hat, and will always be worn on such formal occasions as christenings, weddings and funerals. Women’s dresses tend to be long. Wizard clothing might be said to be frozen in time, harking back to the seventeenth century, when they went into hiding. Their nostalgic adherence to this old-fashioned form of dress may be seen as a clinging to old ways and old times; a matter of cultural pride. Day to day, however, even those who detest Muggles wear a version of Muggle clothing, which is undeniably practical compared with robes. Anti-Muggles will often attempt to demonstrate their superiority by adopting a deliberately flamboyant, out-of-date or dandyish style in public.

(From Pottermore)

Which gives a general indication.

That being said, I wanted to do a more proper rundown since we know they're not really frozen in time considering Ron's Yule ball dress robes were "out of fashion". So I did some outfits rundown for various characters on various occasions to get the mental image of how common muggle clothing is in wizard fashion and who's wearing robes vs muggle clothes and when:

Formalwear

Formal robes are worn in all formal occasions by both men and women:

“What?” said Ron, looking horror-struck. ��Dress robes!” repeated Mrs. Weasley. “It says on your school list that you’re supposed to have dress robes this year... robes for formal occasions.”

(GoF)

however; his dress robes didn’t have any lace on them at all — in fact, they were more or less the same as his school ones, except that they were bottle green instead of black.

(GoF)

“Hi,” said Padma, who was looking just as pretty as Parvati in robes of bright turquoise.

(GoF)

Malfoy was in front; he was wearing dress robes of black velvet with a high collar, which in Harry’s opinion made him look like a vicar. Pansy Parkinson in very frilly robes of pale pink was clutching Malfoy’s arm. 

(GoF)

Mrs. Weasley was wearing a brand-new set of amethyst-colored robes with a matching hat. A moment later Bill and Charlie stood up at the front of the marquee, both wearing dress robes, with large white roses in their buttonholes; 

(DH)

I assume the cuts of the robes are different, and that women's dress robes tend to be longer, which is true according to the books:

tried to sell Hermione wizard’s dress robes instead of witch��s

(HBP)

So wizard robes and witches dress robes are designed differently. I assume robes for daywear do have different cuts for wizards and witches but there are some unisex designs (like Hogwarts robes).

Daywear

Most wizards seem to wear casual robes in their daily lives and are unaccustomed to trousers and find them odd or uncomfortable, especially the older wizards who are unfamiliar with muggle culture:

“Muggle women wear them, Archie, not the men, they wear these,” said the Ministry wizard, and he brandished the pinstriped trousers. “I’m not putting them on,” said old Archie in indignation. “I like a healthy breeze ’round my privates, thanks.”

(GoF)

Hogwarts Professors also wear robes on a daily basis:

Lockhart, wearing lurid pink robes to match the decorations

(CoS)

Snape whirled about, robes swishing behind him, and stormed out of the ward.

(PoA)

Professor McGonagall had broken away from the spectators, marched straight up to Professor Trelawney and was patting her firmly on the back while withdrawing a large handkerchief from within her robes.

(OotP)

Dumbledore, of course, is more extreme in his robes choice:

He was wearing long robes, a purple cloak that swept the ground, and high-heeled, buckled boots.

(PS)

Professor Dumbledore, the headmaster, his sweeping silver hair and beard shining in the candlelight, his magnificent deep green robes embroidered with many stars and moons.

(GoF)

For the most part wizards seem to wear full muggle outfits only when trying to fit in among muggles like in the first example in this section or Dumbledore's plum suit from HBP:

This younger Albus Dumbledore’s long hair and beard were auburn. Having reached their side of the street, he strode off along the pavement, drawing many curious glances due to the flamboyantly cut suit of plum velvet that he was wearing. “Nice suit, sir,” said Harry, before he could stop himself

(HBP)

Mr. Weasley was sitting at the table, checking a sheaf of large parchment tickets. He looked up as the boys entered and spread his arms so that they could see his clothes more clearly. He was wearing what appeared to be a golfing sweater and a very old pair of jeans, slightly too big for him and held up with a thick leather belt. “What d’you think?” he asked anxiously. “We’re supposed to go incognito — do I look like a Muggle, Harry?”

(GoF)

So it seems most wizards own at least one "muggle passing" outfit for extensions in the muggle world (to varying degrees of success depending on their muggle knowledge):

There was Mad-Eye Moody, looking quite as sinister with his bowler hat pulled low over his magical eye as he would have done without it, his gnarled hands clutching a long staff, his body wrapped in a voluminous traveling cloak. Tonks stood just behind him, her bright bubble-gum-pink hair gleaming in the sunlight filtering through the dirty glass station ceiling, wearing heavily patched jeans and a bright purple T-shirt bearing the legend THE WEIRD SISTERS. Next to Tonks was Lupin, his face pale, his hair graying, a long and threadbare overcoat covering a shabby jumper and trousers. At the front of the group stood Mr. and Mrs. Weasley, dressed in their Muggle best, and Fred and George, who were both wearing brand-new jackets in some lurid green, scaly material.

(OotP)

Tonks who is more familiar with muggle fashion, clearly knows what to wear better than the Weasleys. That being said, we do see wizard-produced muggle clothes; like Tonks' Wierd Sisters T-shirt and Fred and George's jackets. So, it is accepted in the WW to wear "muggle-inspired" clothing in terms of cut, but with magical flare when it comes to materials or prints (which are way more colorful and whimsical).

Harry, who was raised in the muggle world, still wears muggle clothes on the breaks up to 5th year at least, but is very used to robes by this point:

“What?” said Ron, looking amazed (Harry wanted to stamp on Ron’s foot, but that sort of thing was much harder to bring off unnoticed when you were wearing jeans rather than robes).

(OotP)

We also know Ron owns at least one pair of jeans in DH:

“D-diffindo,” she said, pointing her wand at Ron, who roared in pain as she slashed open the knee of his jeans, leaving a deep cut. “Oh, I’m so sorry, Ron, my hand’s shaking! Diffindo!” [...] “It’s no wonder I can’t get it out, Hermione, you packed my old jeans, they’re tight.”

(DH)

But Hermione packed said pair for him with the expectation they'll be hiding in the muggle world potentially, so I'm not sure if you could count it since it is implied Ron owns just one pair of jeans that actually fit him. It could be his one jeans for a muggle excursion or a comment on the Weasleys' finances, 🤷🏻‍♀️.

Wizards sometimes mix and match muggle and wizard clothes, like with the jumpers Mrs. Weasley knits.

So, while it seems most wizards do own some muggle clothing for when they go into the muggle world. We mostly see the Wesleys (and even Harry) in robes and cloaks even when not at school, but sometimes they are combined with muggle-inspired clothes (since they are clearly wizard-made due to color and pattern choices):

When he’d found his scarlet team robes and pulled on his cloak for warmth

(CoS)

‘Tm sorry, sir,” said Harry, emphasizing the last word as he stowed his wand inside his robes.

(HBP) - on a weekend.

“Keep it safe till we work out how to destroy it,” Harry replied, and, little though he wanted to, he hung the chain around his own neck, dropping the locket out of sight beneath his robes, where it rested against his chest beside the pouch Hagrid had given him.

(DH) - when on the run

More examples of mix and matching muggle-inspired clothes appear later in this post.

But to your question, I'd say the Weasleys probably don't wear muggle clothes around the Burrow usually. They don't seem that knowledgeable about muggle fashion. Molly and Arthur seem to only own the one set of muggle clothes for going into the muggle world. Their children do seem to own some muggle-inspired jackets and shirts and jumpers, but they are probably worn with robes more often than with jeans.

Workwear

For Potions, Herbology, and other manual labor there are work robes that are worn by Hogwarts students and teachers alike:

Professor Sprout put the pink, fluffy pair over her own ears, rolled up the sleeves of her robes, grasped one of the tufty plants firmly, and pulled hard.

(CoS)

First-year students will require: 1 . Three sets of plain work robes (black) 2. One plain pointed hat (black) for day wear 3. One pair of protective gloves (dragon hide or similar) 4. One winter cloak (black, silver fastenings) 

(PS)

So, contrary to the Pottermore article (which I suspect was written to justify the movies' choices a bit), it seems "robes" are the go-to for working around and not muggle trousers for most wizards and witches.

Sportswear

Yawning and shivering slightly, Harry climbed out of bed and tried to find his Quidditch robes.

(CoS)

They were robes for Quidditch and sports.

Professional wear

Ministry personnel wear either robes:

“Morning, Reg!” called another wizard in navy blue robes as he let himself into a cubicle by inserting his golden token into a slot in the door.

(DH)

The man’s scowling, slightly brutish face was somehow at odds with his magnificent, sweeping robes, which were embroidered with much gold thread.

(DH)

Or more muggle-influenced suits, as shown by Fudge:

Fudge took off his pinstriped cloak and tossed it aside, then hitched up the trousers of his bottle-green suit and sat down opposite Harry. “I am Cornelius Fudge, Harry. The Minister of Magic.”

(PoA)

This is an example of mixing muggle-inspired wizard clothes with more traditional cloaks. Umbridge also does this with her pink cardigan over more traditional robes:

squat, with short, curly, mouse-brown hair in which she had placed a horrible pink Alice band that matched the fluffy pink cardigan she wore over her robes.

(OotP)

But it's clearly not quite muggle fashion as they mix and match muggle-inspired and wizard clothing. Again, these more muggle clothes are still wizardwear and have the typical whimsy of wizard fashion when it comes to colors (like the bright green scales of Fred & George's jackets) and fabrics (scales on the aforementioned jackets & Umbridge's fluffy cardigan is probably more extreme than the muggle version of it because wizards are extra like that).

Hats

Wizards are often mentioned wearing hats (mentioned in many of the quotes I brought up and other quotes I didn't copy here), in contrast to muggle fashion in the 1990s where hats were largely out of fashion. So when imagining wizard fashion in formal or professional settings, imagine a matching hat to the robes they are wearing. Hats in daywear seem to be quite common too, especially among older characters.

As you can tell, I love talking about wizard fashion.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

We’ve come a long way from Megxit 2020 and Harry and Meghan haven’t really stopped talking in the four years.

What is your view on their approach to their children. I don’t want to talk about their children just your view from a PR perspective. Do you think they got what they wanted?

I don't know if it could be stressed enough just how badly and how much Harry and Meghan overestimated the interest in their children.

Yes, there was public interest in Harry's children, but it wasn't (and wouldn't have ever been) anywhere close to the same level or scale as the attention William and his family received or experienced, which is what Harry and Meghan expected. They expected the public to be falling all over themselves with Royal Baby Fever. They expected the world's press to camp outside the hospital for Meghan's glamorous debut. They expected the BRF to give them HRHs and Prince/Princess titles and to shut down all of central London so Harry could drive his wife and new baby home by himself without having to worry about terrorists and paparazzi chasing after them.

When none of that happened, they threw tantrums. They kept Archie's birth a secret. They played keep-away with his face for a couple of months until the christening. They schemed with an American media company to broadcast the first images of their son. They refused to let their son use Harry's subsidiary title. They flipped everyone off. They refused to name the godparents. They instituted rules demanding their neighbors not speak of, look at, or touch their child. (The public's, and BRF's, apathy when Lili was born was even worse.)

Not that they had to do any of that - it was fully and totally their call to do whatever they wanted with their child. But they can't keep the public behind a gated cinderblock wall and then be upset when the public doesn't react when they're finally given a morsel of information about a kid they haven't seen - it's as The Queen said: she had to be seen to be believed. For royal babies, they have to be seen to be loved.

The Sussexes never understood that. They always assumed that the kids would be loved because they were Harry's children. But they were wrong. They were soooooooooooooo wrong and it's why there's so much doubt and speculation that the kids even exist in the first place, which is also what tanked their ability to use the kids for PR.

Which is probably a good thing. Those kids have it rough enough as it is.

[royalteachitchat]

Wow! 👏👏👏 JDEadonWriter on X, put this amazing post out today. Check this out!

Are Meghan Markle's kids FAKE? 🤔

Megnant

1 Size: Bump drastically altering in size, even in a single day 😯

2 Slip: Bump slipped down to her knees in Birkenhead, UK 😯

3 Wobble: Bump wobbled side-to-side as she crossed the street. 😯

4 Clutching: Supporting her bump with her hands overly often. 🤔

5 Popping: audibly popped in a video, and wafted her clothes😯

6 Shape: Bump unnaturally shaped on Netflix🤔

7 Straps: Moonbump straps outlines visible under clothing in several photos. And something snapped, impacting the clothing fabric (video of H&M in London)😯

8 Biology: An absence of swelling of ankles, and other subtle biological (non)signs.🤔

9 Holding: Carrying a (doll?) infant on her bump, instead of on her hip.🤔

10 Squats: Squatting, effortlessly, with her knees together in videos and photos. In heels.😯

Births

11 Announcements: Royal official birth announcements are indirect. One states they are delighted "by the news of the" (not by the actual) birth.🤔

12 Coverup? A medic who certified a birth closed down her practice shortly afterwards.😯

13 Certificates: Questions linger over the birth certificates signatures, etc.🤔

14 Leak: An official Royal twitter account tweet indicated that Meghan’s kids are fake, before being taken down. An innocent prank?😁

15 Recovery: Epidural (ouch!) birth in a bath description anomalies and arriving home too soon afterwards to be quite plausible.🤔

16 Born Of Body?: Meghan allegedly told a friend she was infertile, when at college, and there was a reported alleged hysterectomy before the births.

17 Silence: Meghan is silent on her claimed births, despite always flashing her bump; having a "Capacity for over sharing"; boasting about being a “Mom”, and always talking about herself (apparently) on her feminist podcast. 🤔

Rented Infants

18 Archie Model: The real parents of the infant predominantly shown in Archie photos are identified. 💥

19 Lilibet Model: Parents of the infant shown in Lilibet photos are identified.💥

20 Loan: Mother of “Lilibet” commented on Insta that she does not "loan" her daughter to Meghan any longer.😯

21 Shape-Shifting: Different infants used in photos of both Archie and Lilibet.😯

22 Photoshopping: A litany of incompetently-photoshopped “family” photos. (A huge topic in itself).🤔

Dolls

23 Reborn Doll: Seemingly cradling a doll (a product called Darren) in official photo of Archie 🪆

24 Party Doll: Meghan seemingly cradled a similar doll when gate-crashing a polo match party, begetting astonished looks.😯

25 Bumpy Ride: Meghan seemed to be lugging an inanimate doll on top of her bump through some woods in Canada. Whilst grinning at a hired pap.🪆

26 Twisted: In one photograph, Archie's head is twisted more than 90 degrees 🪆

27 Carrying: A high % of photographs show them carrying the “kids” 🪆

28 Backs-Turned: A high % of Photos are of kids facing away from the camera 🤔

Other Oddities

29 Website: A startling absence of updates of Royal website on Meghan’s offspring.🤔

30 Bishop: Los Angeles christening cleric was not the official Bishop the Harkles claimed he was.🤔

31 Implausible Platitudes: Claiming Archie’s first word was “Crocodile”, and that he demands a Leica camera for his birthday. As tots do...🤔

32 Merch: An uncharacteristic unwillingness to merchandise their kids, for $$$ or PR.🤔

33 Invisible: The Harkles are never seen with their kids. There are hints of "home schooling" (will they ever be allowed out?)😯

34 Family Holidays: Weirdly, the Harkles never take their kids on holiday, and, if they pretend they did, they incompetently photoshop them into pap snaps on Insta.🤔

35 Everything Else: All the stuff I overlooked in this hastily speed-typed list.🤔

🤔🤔🤔

Why does it matter? 🤔

Because rich Prince Harry wants we skint, long-suffering tax payers, to pay for his security expenses; he’s a traitor, and, well, it’s fraud, isn’t it? 💥

Feel free to leave evidence I missed out in the comments. 👍

#MeghanMarkleIsAGrifter

#MeghanMarkleExposed

#WhereAreTheKids

#sussexbabyscam

[celticcrossanon]

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has been seriously MARKLED! I wish Welby had gotten Markled for allegedly christening Archie when Welby's real itinerary as Archbishop showed he was nowhere nearby Windsor Castle when Archie was "christened" .... and Welby's office continued to refuse to answer inquiries from members of the public who picked up on that strange discrepancy.

Hi Nonny,

Yes, there were some very shady things about that christening, The Archbishop's attendance being one of them.

I am appalled that Welby allegedly knew about the actions of a serial sex abuser for decades and did nothing about it.

[dflogerzi]

Say Hey Charles... Will you kick one out here?

Although few will give you a cheer if you do...

I get it. The can kicking is part of the monarchy motto. Just keep the stiff upper lip, never explain, complain, or even deal. Works right? And in your case... what the hell, William can deal with it. You are too old, too infirm, too weighted with duty, too "fill in the dang blank".

I was never a huge fan. I have watched your path for many decades, and I am speaking of from the time I stood in the Mall in London on your wedding day cheering with the masses. One learns things...

Like today. The supposed "Christening" photo of the alleged child born of Meghan Markle's body named Archie. Gasp... horror... now apparently photoshopped (like we did not already know). Say in a kingly voice and with authority it is not so...

You may have mastered kicking the can down the road. But all so said containers become dented, worn, and must eventually be trashed. The truth is going to come out. Many truths. And I hope I am around long enough to hear the excuses you, and even yours, have as to why you have supported, or hid, or whatever you did... one of the most illegal acts ever pulled on the Line of Succession in a monarchy dating a thousand years.

Pick up your own trash.

William. You need to stop watching this disaster in play. It is obvious you know. Do not wear this for history and your own legacy.

Darling England. I am so sorry. You deserve better. We all do.

Written by little me from the grand state of Nevada. In my own little corner, in my own little chair. Cheap seats. But I have a rich mind.

Onward.

P.S. This written was merely my own opinion. My truth, why I am on Tumblr with this account, and it means nothing outside of that. It is a vent. And I rather liked doing it. Thank you.

[mollydollyuk]

At last. Too much to hope the papers start digging a bit deeper into Rachel's photos.

[jerseydeanne]

"It would make sense if the Sussexes’ decision-making regarding timing had something to do with the fact they are now regularly the butt of TV jokes and that their approval numbers in the US have only plummeted and then plummeted some more."

[sassyfrassboss]

I'm leaving royal watching. Karma never gets the Harkles and I'm so heartbroken about this. They've got fabulous PR right when the takedown was about to happen. He's the ultimate victim now that people will forget Charles has another son. I'm done.

Honestly, I think karma has hit them pretty well since 2018.

Let's face it, they were put in their place back in 2018/2019. Look at the Prince of Wales event where they were ushered to the side and not allowed to join the more senior royals. Not only that but neither TQ nor PP attending Archie's christening and PP was available.

They signed Netflix and Spotify but within a couple years Spotify dropped them and let it be known they were a nightmare to work with. Netflix is probably waiting out their contract. They might have "new" projects in the works but they are at the beginning stages and will never see the light of day.

Meghan had to preform her own parade march at the last IG to try and compete with Catherine from the coronation.

Harry might be getting invited to some events but they are B-C list events. I mean that flying award was bonkers.

Hollywood won't touch them. Not one red carpet invite. Not one yachting in the South of France invite from the billionaires. The same billionaires that would have invited back in 2018 but Harry wasn't allowed to accept.

I think karma has come nicely for them.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

Evidence that proves Meghan and Harry's photo of Prince Archie was doctored and that the Sussex's are now trying to cover it up. by u/Quiet-Vanilla-7117

Evidence that proves Meghan and Harry's photo of Prince Archie was doctored, and that the Sussex's are now trying to cover it up. Posted for u/Siabreeze who doesn't yet have posting privileges.Today, CNN posted that Catherine had "doctored" a picture of the Queen because it stated on Getty that the image had been "digitally enhanced at source."Meghan and Harry's photo of Archie's christening said the EXACT SAME THING, that it had been "digitally enhanced at source."I noticed this a few days ago and I archived the Getty page in the Wayback Machine, because I was worried that the Sussex's might try to remove this. And that's exactly what happened.The Getty webpage has now been edited and the part about the photo being digitally enhanced has been removed. The Sussex's are the copyright holders of the image, so it would've had to have been them who did this.This is the current Getty webpage with the "digitally enhanced at source" removed: https://ift.tt/83lWGbL is the March 15th archived version from the Wayback Machine before the description was tampered with: https://ift.tt/DOnqY5V just wanted to make everyone aware of this because Catherine is getting slammed by the sugars and the media for doing the exact same thing Harry and Meghan did. And I know the news media sometimes lurks on this sub, so maybe one of them will see this and report on the cover up the Sussex's are now engaged in.This is the original description from Getty that states the picture was digitally enhanced:​https://ift.tt/LEizTMl post link: https://ift.tt/SvmbOI8 author: Quiet-Vanilla-7117 submitted: March 20, 2024 at 01:48AM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[lucasrogersartblog]

(Before reading, know this is for an AU i'm currently developing which utilizes primarily the Sonic games, SatAM/Archie, and Aosth as main canons for inspiration, but I will pull ideas from other canons as well. Thank you for checking this out, and enjoy!)

Alright, and to christen this blog, I present to you my redesign and some backstory of my AU version of the one-shot villan of AoStH's Trail of the Missing Tails, Dr. Warpnik! I'm still ironing out his backstory, but taking a bit of inspiration from @cylent-nite, his original name would be Warren Robotnik, and is the older brother to Maria Robotnik. 50 years ago, after the raid on the space colony, A.R.K., Warren would be taken in and hidden by his material grandparents in England, taking on the name Irving Pavlov. During his school years Warren would begin looking into Multiverse Theory, and began to pursue a career in spatial based science as he got older with the goal and hope of breaking through the dimensinal barriers to find a universe were his sister still lives. In the year 3221, three years before the events of what would be the Coup of the Acorn Kingdom, Warren, still going by Irving, would be contacted by his cousin, Julian Ivo Robotnik (Dr. Eggman). Julian would come to offer Warren a high-end lab and plentiful resources for his spacial research. Julian admits he needs Warren's help and reserch to open the path to Alternate Universes for his goal of finding the Special Zone, a space between the Alternate Dimensions, to acquire the seven Chaos Emeralds for his planned coup against King Nigel, Julian would make it very clear that nobody could know where he was if did do this. Warren would accept on the condition that he would be Julian's Chief Scientist after the Coup was over and Julian had established his rule, Julian would agree to the terms, and would have his loyalists smuggle him into the kingdom in secret. Between Warren's knowledge of space and alternate dimensions, Julian's brilliant mind, and assitance from Julian's nephew, Colin Robotnik Jr. (Snively), they would, in secret, go through many attempts at creating the perfect device to enter other dimensions, which would include the unwieldy Warp Topaz, but they would find their breakthrough after seven long months in the creation of the Star Posts, a device that ran off one of Prof. Chariles Parlouzer's (Uncle Chuck's) Power Ring prototypes would successfully stabilze a gateway into the Special Zone. After the test, Julian would have his now revealed SWAT-Bots try to restrain Warren. He would lose them for a moment before crashing into a desk, sneaking the Warp Topaz into his pocket. Warren would be apprehend, just as more SWAT-Bots enter the lab with the already unconscious court magician, Walter Naugus, in tow. Snively watched in horror as Julian picked a location on the edge of the known space of the Special Zone to exile his now former Allies, Warren would promise to return and get even as Julian had Warren and Naugus thrown into the Special Zone.

(I hope you enjoyed this piece. This is both my first post and my first complete digital drawing ever, so any respectful and constructive criticism is welcome and appreciated. Ya'll have a good rest of your day or night.)

[anonymoushouseplantfan]

Regarding the interest on their children as H says. Nobody is interested on their children outside their fans every one was turned off when they did that shenanigans with Archie's birth, even when they announce on People mag the christening of Lilibet and calling her a princess didn't get much traction instead they were called out for being the hypocrites that they are hence we got 2 more articles justifying the use of titiles from the institution they hate/trash every chance they get and about how it is their childrens birth right. In their head, they really think they are equal with W&K so as their children with G,C and L.

They do think they are equal.