#// this turned into a book-
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
sparrowlucero · 19 days ago
Text
like the most politically neutered movie of all time unironically
Tumblr media
41K notes · View notes
razzafrazzle · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Just Checking In! (aka Something About Red Triangles)
57K notes · View notes
culbi · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
oh hiiii
18K notes · View notes
mikimuun · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
bill gets reincarnated!
9K notes · View notes
doctorsiren · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
More on that AU I scribbled where Bill’s parents were alive and were supportive of their son and his actions <3
14K notes · View notes
staff · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr Tuesday: TURN BACK NOW
Hello, Tumblr. This is your warning. Do not interact with this post. Do not reblog this post. Do not, under any circumstances, like this post. You know what will happen if you do. You have been warned. —Stanford Pines
@astllee:
Tumblr media
@clumxy:
Tumblr media
@clacy2812:
Tumblr media
@ponpasta:
Tumblr media
@d1rtb:
Tumblr media
@s0up1ta:
Tumblr media
@nyenyel:
Tumblr media
@umboloae:
Tumblr media
@yujateaandpi:
Tumblr media
@scandalous-dirtcup:
Tumblr media
@emilylovescookies:
Tumblr media
@n0cturnalcm:
Tumblr media
@drowninnoodles:
Tumblr media
@meriahlatyar:
Tumblr media
@donniipao:
Tumblr media
@tiilore:
Tumblr media
@eerieseelie:
Tumblr media
@paddysol:
Tumblr media
@cactikoi:
Tumblr media
@kddqr:
Tumblr media
@solarwreathe:
Tumblr media
@laz-262:
Tumblr media
19K notes · View notes
cryptocism · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
"just as I did, in 1983."
you'd never know my favourite parts of the show are the fucked up insane bits when my first instinct is to draw the cheesiest thing imaginable
12K notes · View notes
krysmcscience · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I have some questions about karaoke night, Alex Hirsch. Very Important Questions. Which I will happily scream at a poor hapless baby triangle who can have no answers for me, and possibly also does not have object permanence yet.
Follow-up that is I guess suggestive, but let's be real here, Bill's a fucking triangle:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Dude slipped right into his birthday suit, lmao
this is so stupid :D
Anyway, I don't care what anyone says, this brilliant individual knows what's up - Bill is absolutely way more of a monsterfucker than Ford could or ever will be, full stop.
9K notes · View notes
pinkpunkdotpng · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
artist rendition of what my mom just walked in on
9K notes · View notes
pineapple-frenzy · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Book 2 au with Zuko and Katara Lee and Huamei
Katara is separated from her friends, and so she's left to travel the earth kingdom on her own. She stumbles across Zuko, who is similarly travelling on his own. They decide that pairing up and travelling together would be best
13K notes · View notes
aethersea · 6 months ago
Text
another thing fantasy writers should keep track of is how much of their worldbuilding is aesthetic-based. it's not unlike the sci-fi hardness scale, which measures how closely a story holds to known, real principles of science. The Martian is extremely hard sci-fi, with nearly every detail being grounded in realistic fact as we know it; Star Trek is extremely soft sci-fi, with a vaguely plausible "space travel and no resource scarcity" premise used as a foundation for the wildest ideas the writers' room could come up with. and much as Star Trek fuckin rules, there's nothing wrong with aesthetic-based fantasy worldbuilding!
(sidenote we're not calling this 'soft fantasy' bc there's already a hard/soft divide in fantasy: hard magic follows consistent rules, like "earthbenders can always and only bend earth", and soft magic follows vague rules that often just ~feel right~, like the Force. this frankly kinda maps, but I'm not talking about just the magic, I'm talking about the worldbuilding as a whole.
actually for the purposes of this post we're calling it grounded vs airy fantasy, bc that's succinct and sounds cool.)
a great example of grounded fantasy is Dungeon Meshi: the dungeon ecosystem is meticulously thought out, the plot is driven by the very realistic need to eat well while adventuring, the story touches on both social and psychological effects of the whole 'no one dies forever down here' situation, the list goes on. the worldbuilding wants to be engaged with on a mechanical level and it rewards that engagement.
deliberately airy fantasy is less common, because in a funny way it's much harder to do. people tend to like explanations. it takes skill to pull off "the world is this way because I said so." Narnia manages: these kids fall into a magic world through the back of a wardrobe, befriend talking beavers who drink tea, get weapons from Santa Claus, dance with Bacchus and his maenads, and sail to the edge of the world, without ever breaking suspension of disbelief. it works because every new thing that happens fits the vibes. it's all just vibes! engaging with the worldbuilding on a mechanical level wouldn't just be futile, it'd be missing the point entirely.
the reason I started off calling this aesthetic-based is that an airy story will usually lean hard on an existing aesthetic, ideally one that's widely known by the target audience. Lewis was drawing on fables, fairy tales, myths, children's stories, and the vague idea of ~medieval europe~ that is to this day our most generic fantasy setting. when a prince falls in love with a fallen star, when there are giants who welcome lost children warmly and fatten them up for the feast, it all fits because these are things we'd expect to find in this story. none of this jars against what we've already seen.
and the point of it is to be wondrous and whimsical, to set the tone for the story Lewis wants to tell. and it does a great job! the airy worldbuilding serves the purposes of the story, and it's no less elegant than Ryōko Kui's elaborately grounded dungeon. neither kind of worldbuilding is better than the other.
however.
you do have to know which one you're doing.
the whole reason I'm writing this is that I saw yet another long, entertaining post dragging GRRM for absolute filth. asoiaf is a fun one because on some axes it's pretty grounded (political fuck-around-and-find-out, rumors spread farther than fact, fastest way to lose a war is to let your people starve, etc), but on others it's entirely airy (some people have magic Just Cause, the various peoples are each based on an aesthetic/stereotype/cliché with no real thought to how they influence each other as neighbors, the super-long seasons have no effect on ecology, etc).
and again! none of this is actually bad! (well ok some of those stereotypes are quite bigoted. but other than that this isn't bad.) there's nothing wrong with the season thing being there to highlight how the nobles are focused on short-sighted wars for power instead of storing up resources for the extremely dangerous and inevitable winter, that's a nice allegory, and the looming threat of many harsh years set the narrative tone. and you can always mix and match airy and grounded worldbuilding – everyone does it, frankly it's a necessity, because sooner or later the answer to every worldbuilding question is "because the author wanted it to be that way." the only completely grounded writing is nonfiction.
the problem is when you pretend that your entirely airy worldbuilding is actually super duper grounded. like, for instance, claiming that your vibes-based depiction of Medieval Europe (Gritty Edition) is completely historical, and then never even showing anyone spinning. or sniffing dismissively at Tolkien for not detailing Aragorn's tax policy, and then never addressing how a pre-industrial grain-based agricultural society is going years without harvesting any crops. (stored grain goes bad! you can't even mouse-proof your silos, how are you going to deal with mold?) and the list goes on.
the man went up on national television and invited us to engage with his worldbuilding mechanically, and then if you actually do that, it shatters like spun sugar under the pressure. doesn't he realize that's not the part of the story that's load-bearing! he should've directed our focus to the political machinations and extensive trope deconstruction, not the handwavey bit.
point is, as a fantasy writer there will always be some amount of your worldbuilding that boils down to 'because I said so,' and there's nothing wrong with that. nor is there anything wrong with making that your whole thing – airy worldbuilding can be beautiful and inspiring. but you have to be aware of what you're doing, because if you ask your readers to engage with the worldbuilding in gritty mechanical detail, you had better have some actual mechanics to show them.
5K notes · View notes
chloesimaginationthings · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Do you guys fuck with the FNAF books?…
7K notes · View notes
lilsillustration · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
One month till wrath of the triple goddess, I’m so excited
4K notes · View notes
sadfishkid · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
green slime be upon ye
9K notes · View notes
mikimuun · 2 months ago
Text
i’ll draw this guy! play with meeeeee
3K notes · View notes
suddenly-frankenstein · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
his guardian angel
4K notes · View notes