Caitriona | Fangirl | Autistic | EditorRandom stuff from my nutty mind :)MasterlistAO3
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
99K notes
路
View notes
Text
FDA: this medication is approved only for people over 5
Insurance: we will cover this medication but only for children under 5
1 note
路
View note
Text
13 notes
路
View notes
Text
Merthur accidental baby aquisition trope meets time shenanigans au
they find a seemingly abandoned (but healthy) baby. this is appalling and they start arguing over what to do. this baby then does magic right where Arthur can see him. His eyes glow gold. Merlin's heart stops as he recognizes that mop of hair on the baby's head.
Arthur is freaking out because 1. a baby having magic challenges everything he was taught about magic and 2. Uther will kill this baby.
Merlin is freaking out because somehow his 2yo self is here and in Arthur's chambers right under Uther's nose.
817 notes
路
View notes
Text
55K notes
路
View notes
Text
Being touch starved but told you鈥檙e too old to cuddle with your parents and your friends live scattered across the country
0 notes
Text
Noble: When I'd heard that Prince Consort Merlin used to be a peasant I'll admit I had my concerns but he is quite the proper gentleman. He's polite, respectful, always uses the proper titles, he's- Arthur: Mad at me Noble: Excuse me, Sire? Arthur: He's mad at me. He only ever puts on this performance of being the perfect consort when he's mad at me, he knows it drives me crazy Merlin: Is there anything you need from me before I retire to my chambers Sire? Arthur: You can tell me what I did wrong so I can fix it and you can go back to insulting me
4K notes
路
View notes
Text
In my first year university course there was a class I remember as being mandatory (at least for English majors) about fallacies and biases in writing. And this prof was all about reading the whole article before you formed your argument. That was his whole thing. You know measure twice cut once he was read twice respond once. He stressed this so much that on our final exam (which was two long form essay questions and a few short answer questions) that I decided to read the WHOLE exam booklet before I grabbed my pen.
Turns out that is what he wanted. The final page, the final question, informed the student that if they wrote 1. Their name, 2. Their student number 3. Their favourite fallacy, and wait for 30 minutes so they don't arouse suspicion, you will literally be given 100 percent for the exam WORTH 40 PERCENT OF YOUR GRADE.
I think about it to this day. The prof literally saw the "reading comprehension on this site is piss poor" and said I can fix them
73K notes
路
View notes
Text
My pizza鈥檚 not pizza-ing!
-Lulu
0 notes
Text
we do need to revisit the wording of "you can't have your cake and eat it too" because i don't think it clearly enough conveys that it's more that you can't simultaneously retain a cake and also get to consume it (which would render you cakeless). for years i was like But why not....it's my cake....?
154K notes
路
View notes
Text
Why do so many of my favorite characters end up being gay? What does that say about me?
0 notes
Text
Y'all want to know what thought is fucking with me today?
Parrots can learn the concept of questions. I don't know about the claim that chimpanzees that were taught sign language never learned to ask questions, or the theory that it simply wouldn't occur to them that the human handlers might know things that they personally do not, or that whatever information they have might be worth knowing. But I don't even remember where I read that, and at best it's an anecdote of an anecdote, but anyway, parrots.
The exact complexity of natural parrot communication in the wild is beyond human understanding for the time being, but you can catch glimpses of how complex it is by looking at how much they learn to pick up from human speech. Sure, they figure out that this sound means this object, animal, person, or other thing. Human says "peanut" and presents a peanut, so the sound "peanut" means peanut. Yes. But if you make the same sound with a rising intonation, you are inquiring about the possibility of a peanut.
A bird that's asking "peanut?" knows there is no peanut physically present in the current situation, but hypothetically, there could be a peanut. The human knows whether there will be a peanut. The bird knows that making this specific human sound with this specific intonation is a way of requesting for this information, and a polite way of informing the human that a peanut is desired.
"I get a peanut?" is a polite spoken request. There is no peanut here, but there could be a peanut. The bird knows that the human knows this. But without the rising intonation of a question, the statement "I get a peanut." is a firm implied threat. There is no peanut here, but there better fucking be one soon. The bird knows that the human knows this.
37K notes
路
View notes
Text
114K notes
路
View notes
Text
16K notes
路
View notes
Text
so i was taking a psychiatric evaluation (i remain the constant lab rat) and one of the questions for screening personality disorders was "have you ever felt that there was something physically wrong with your body, but the doctor didn't believe you?"
and i straight up stopped the interview and said (to the two male researchers) "that's just the experience of being female and going to the doctor." and they just kind of stared at me.
4K notes
路
View notes