#whose body
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
hailingsweetpotatoes · 3 months ago
Text
this sucks so bad I need to [remembers suicide jokes only worsen my mental health] investigate a naked corpse that was found in the bathtub of an architect my mother met one time
238 notes · View notes
o-uncle-newt · 3 months ago
Text
I just got a bit more time in my schedule and I'm hoping to get started on a Sayers-and-Jews reading list, if anyone has any suggestions! I just really feel like I've never seen anyone talk about how WEIRD the apparent received wisdom is of "Sayers was in a relationship with a completely secular Jew who tried to convince her to have premarital sex she was religiously uncomfortable with, which NATURALLY made her start writing about Jews, but a totally different kind of basically fetishized ultra-conservative type than Cournos was." There are clearly missing links there- not an obvious or intuitive connection at all- and I have my own ideas of what they are and am so curious if it's already been written about.
#dorothy l sayers#lord peter wimsey#whose body#i think the main connecting factor is religious conservatism#and sayers displaying a kind of christian philosemitism that is genuinely fascinating#an idealization of jews as an almost purer throwback#backward and benighted (bc no jesus) but also in some ways uncorrupted by “modernity” for some reason#in terms of how she'd get it from cournos#he DID have some interesting ideas about jews and christians#(wrote an article about how jews should be more into jesus)#but my guess is that the christian philosemitism came first#and the connective tissue is her encountering a jew who didn't fit that kind of odd religious ideal of them#and then deciding to construct a bunch that do#idk#it's the only thing that makes sense to me#that scene in busman's honeymoon where peter asks the repo man what he thinks of christian home life and the repo man says “not much”...#imo that says a LOT#i should say that it can't be overstated how almost fetishistic and full of artistic license her portrayal of jews is#the jews she knew irl were largely secular so where did she get this nonsense#she has to have known that jews didn't do ARRANGED MARRIAGES FROM BIRTH like she depicts in piscatorial face of the stolen stomach#so like something is going on#to be clear#and this is part of what's weird#i don't mean “conservative” or “traditional” in a religious sense in the way that old fashioned caricatures often use#but instead conservative morally#which is if anything weirder and just makes it feel even more like sayers is juxtaposing some idealized morality and conservatism onto jews
17 notes · View notes
larissa-the-scribe · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Started reading Whose Body by Dorothy L. Sayers, and was startled by an appearance from an English relative of my skateboarding cousin Throckmorton
I know it's spelled differently but that was all I could think of lol
10 notes · View notes
thesarahshay · 10 months ago
Text
Ugh. How many times have I read Whose Body, and Lady Levy sobbing her husband's name can still make me cry if I'm in the wrong mood.
8 notes · View notes
fromthedeskofcripslock · 6 months ago
Text
@tragicfantasy-girl This! Oh my word, exactly this.
I started them out on a whim (no pun intended) and out of curiosity because a post here said that the detective Benoit Blanc (of Knives Out/Glass Onion) most resembles is really Lord Peter Wimsey and not Poirot or Holmes. [Edit: It was this post. Thank you, @mywingsareonwheels for literally changing my life.]
Whose Body Chapter II's description of 110A Piccadilly's library and the presence of the debate between a physiological intellectual basis for mental health (nerves in the canon terminology) in the guise of Sir Julian Freke caught my brain; the scene between Lord Peter and "Sergeant" Bunter—that closing line!—in Chapter XVIII caught my whole heart.
The heart was cinched in Clouds of Witness with Lord Peter's actions in Peter's Pit, and his understanding of what faced Mrs. Grimethorpe within the context of the inequality of society's treatment and husbands and wives. That understanding, incidentally, is one that I view as both plausibly in-character, and a wonderful moment of the author(ess)'s voice shining through.
By the time I'd made it to The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club, the glorious prose, the human characters and the treatment of inter-generational relations, along with her continued engagement with how society coped (or failed to cope) in the wake of WWI and PTSD (The War and shell shock, to use Sayers' terms) meant that D.L. Sayers had (and has) my soul .
All of the above is to say nothing of the impact Sayers's writing has had on me because she writes a respectful treatment (in the sense that it is nuanced and fully-formed) of characters like Ann Dorland and Lady Mary and Annie and
Miss Twitterton; she creates Miss Climpson and her agency of women, and Harriet Vane and her own agency—in the other sense of the word! —and the plethora of more minor female characters who populate the later books. It is an absolute joy and privilege to read women characters of that time written by THAT women author at that time.
On that note, I hope that @kindredspiritsandgoodomens won't mind if I share here their tags on a post by @itspileofgoodthings about Ann Dorland.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
This really ought to top every “Best Opening Lines,” list. The 21st century reading public is sleeping on Dorothy L Sayers.
(Have His Carcase 1932)
3K notes · View notes
foxandcatlibrary · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
13th Book I Read in 2024
Title: Whose Body?
Author: Dorothy L. Sayers
Notes: Didn't really like this one. Maybe I wasn't in the right mood when I read it, but I found it difficult to focus on.
1 note · View note
hiveswap · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
7K notes · View notes
poorly-drawn-mdzs · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Ghouls night out
[First] Prev <–-> Next
#poorly drawn mdzs#mdzs#wei wuxian#lan wangji#Scopophobia#Don't be mean Lan Wangji - the dead girl aesthetic is a curated one. Support women's rights to look dead!#I have been waiting for this scene for ages...the ghost girl entourage is such a good look for WWX.#And by gods does the audio drama actually do something interesting with one of them.#Namely that we actually get to see WWX talk with them and learn about who they were and what they left behind.#I love necromancer characters but it's way too common for them to be like “Go! Ghost no.145!” like they're a pokemon#and not...you know...someone who had a whole life that they left behind.#I love me a necromancer who has an awareness to whose soul/body they are using. It adds a lot of flavour!#MDZS is a little hit or miss with this. I think the fans do a lot of the work with making Mo Xuanyu a bigger character.#Yi City has this in spades. Even though we don't individually get character backstories#We get many painful reminders about how these 'corpses' were people.#We also get a few lines about how WWX used whatever corpses he could get his hands on (including grandparents - Woof!)#MDZS often (but not always) likes to remind us that every sacrifice and every ghost was a person.#It is so close to nailing the landing regarding the deconstruction of the necromancer character.#Anyhow. You may have noticed the uptick in quality in the last two comics. Rule of three means next one is going to be a treat B*)#See you all very soon!
1K notes · View notes
sanguinarysanguinity · 6 months ago
Text
“Oh, damn!” said Lord Peter Wimsey at Piccadilly Circus. “Hi, driver!” The taxi man, irritated at receiving this appeal while negotiating the intricacies of turning into Lower Regent Street across the route of a 19 'bus, a 38-b and a bicycle, bent an unwilling ear. “I've left the catalogue behind,” said Lord Peter deprecatingly, “uncommonly careless of me. D'you mind puttin' back to where we came from?” “To the Savile Club, sir?” “No—110a Piccadilly—just beyond—thank you.” “Thought you was in a hurry,” said the man, overcome with a sense of injury. “I'm afraid it's an awkward place to turn in,” said Lord Peter, answering the thought rather than the words. His long, amiable face looked as if it had generated spontaneously from his top hat, as white maggots breed from Gorgonzola.
^ How Dorothy L. Sayers chose to introduce Lord Peter Wimsey to the world.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
i wish cs forester was real so i could ask him why he started a book like this and how precisely am i meant to interpret it
188 notes · View notes
hailingsweetpotatoes · 2 months ago
Text
If I had a nickel for every time Dorothy Sayers wrote a book where a woman who owns a sweet shop is on a jury, I'd only have 10 cents, but it's still weird that it happened twice.
12 notes · View notes
bobbinalong · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
matching cuts courtesy of steph (tim's not allowed to cut his own hair anymore)
502 notes · View notes
o-uncle-newt · 2 months ago
Text
OK, doing this as a reblog rather than comment as I have THOUGHTS on this and they may as well be immortalized-
I started with the first book because I'd heard that the Peter/Harriet storyline was great but I believe in reading the whole thing of a thing for context. So I took Whose Body and Clouds of Witness out of the library, and HATED* Whose Body enough that I almost returned Clouds of Witness to the library unread. But I never ever do that, and I was genuinely intrigued enough by Clouds of Witness when I read it- in some ways the most classic manor house murder mystery Sayers ever did, but also far more interesting character-wise given WImsey's connections to all the people involved and Sayers's general great character work- that I decided to keep going. My recent trip to London included walking tours of both Oxford and Bloomsbury to see the places where Sayers/Harriet Vane lived and worked, so you can tell that keeping on going paid off lol.
But anyway, if you disliked Whose Body as a mystery then you'll like pretty much all of her other books better- she got much better at deciding when she was writing a whodunnit and when she was writing a howcatchem. Whose Body is the worst of both- you know immediately who must have done it, why, and like 80% of how, and so the book feels a bit like it was written solely to have the opportunity for that weird weird way of writing (about) Jews. If you thought that the pacing was off, in later books the MYSTERY pacing isn't always perfect, but she gets much better at character-driven, novelistic pacing so it doesn't always matter. In general, she develops a lot as a mystery writer but far more as a novelist.
Clouds of Witness is, again, much more classic manor house mystery, and it is a whodunnit, though the ending is... a bit controversial. But even if you hate it, the rest of the book is more than solid, and a good intro to the greater Wimsey family. The next novel is Unnatural Death, and while it's definitely better than Whose Body it has a lot of the same deep weirdnesses- it's a better mystery in that it's decided to be a howcatchem rather than a whodunnit and commits to that, and in some ways it's a better novel (though the pacing is off- it's way too slow at the beginning and way too jam-packed at the end) and it introduces at least one excellent character (Miss Climpson), but it is also EXTREMELY racist in the ways that Whose Body was antisemitic- as in, intending in some ways deliberately not to be but emphatically being so anyway.
The novel after THAT, The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club, is fabulous, probably her best integration of mystery plot and novel plot, fascinating themes and character work, just really really solid and one of my favorite things Sayers ever wrote. It also has themes that I think are very important to read, and characters who I think are important to be introduced to, before getting to Strong Poison. I highly, highly recommend it, and it's for that reason that I will STRONGLY disagree with everyone who recommends skipping straight to Strong Poison because Bellona Club is Important.
So long story short, my recommendation is- go to Clouds of Witness (oh, and if nothing else, it introduces a plotline that gets resolved in Strong Poison). If you love it and want to see Peter develop chronologically, as a person, and are willing to read something that is deeply interesting while also being deeply flawed, go in chronological order to Unnatural Death (and while you're at it read the first short story collection- it's VERY uneven but there's some interesting Peter development there too). If you are meh on Clouds of Witness, try Bellona Club. I honestly think that Strong Poison is best when you've experienced and liked Peter as a person before reading it, because he makes some... interesting choices in it and it's helpful to know what he's like/his baseline. Clouds of Witness is one of the best early books for giving info about how Peter relates to family and ancestry and people who have been in his life a long time, and Bellona Club, while not Peter-focused, is one of the best at kind of giving us his general approach to the world on a baseline level. Both of those, I think, are important before seeing his world get tipped on its axis in Strong Poison.
Question for anyone who's read the Peter Whimsey books by Dorothy Sayers: where's the best place to start with the series? I read Book 1 ages ago and was not impressed, but I have heard that the first book isn't actually the best introduction, so I'm thinking of giving the series another shot. Any suggestions?
37 notes · View notes
captain-astors · 26 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
The Crown Prince
#my art#Yes this is meant to parallel the Reiju piece and I will be drawing Yonji and Niji next.#those are judge's hands in case it wasn't clear but hopefully the hair does that?#Anyways to chatter about this a little#I just like that the trio are trapped within bodies that are forced to comply to Judge and have no desire to do otherwise#No mind to think. No will to break. No voice to cry suffering.#but it also raises the question what will happen to them when he dies and Ichiji becomes King (presumably)#they've been so sculpted to follow his every word how far can they make it without an outside force commanding them.#could they have been “saved” if they had Sora's exterior voice commanding them to do good? But to what extent does that qualify as good#since it's arguable if they would ever be truly choosing it for themselves#Anyways the Vinsmokes are NOT okay and I hope that gets explored more#I love characters whose moral code begins and ends with “It is my purpose” so I don't like to think they're inherently bad entities#I like to think they're inherently hollow vessels filled with intentions of another person#because that opens a far more interesting conversation about selfhood and accountability.#Very fond of fanfictions where they don't need to gain emotions to learn error#Also fond of fanfictions where Ichiji kisses men. If you've made it this far maybe recommend me one.#I have more cohesive thoughts on this but it's almost midnight ask me if you want to know more I promise I'm usually very articulate#if I'm missing something I haven't actually gotten to them in the story yet.#one piece#one piece fanart#ichiji vinsmoke#germa 66#vinsmoke ichiji
300 notes · View notes
thesarahshay · 11 months ago
Text
Hey, Sayers Hivemind: Which story/book has Peter discussing Shakespeare with a woman who points out that the Bard overused the "woman dressed as a man" plot element, and says something like, "If I were a hero in Shakespeare and saw some slim-legged young page boy, I'd say 'Odds bodkins, it's that girl again!'" I can't remember for the life of me, and I haven't been able to google it either.
6 notes · View notes
u3pxx · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
[gavin parents] and i hope you die, i hope we both die
1K notes · View notes
daily-sifloop · 7 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Day 87: Helltaker AU
331 notes · View notes