#unforgivablengk

[ingravinoveritas]

did you see this? https://x.com/achtungchio/status/1768089834222977466?s=20

Oh my God. Yes, yes I have indeed seen that post, but for those who haven't let's get a screenshot up:

This comes from a fan who attended tonight's performance of Nye and was at the stage door afterward and overheard this exchange between Michael and another fan. (A second fan has made another post here on Tumblr also confirming what Michael said.)

So...just to put things in perspective, it has been eight months since GO season 2 first aired, and one month since we've gotten a comment from David about what it was like to kiss Michael. And now we finally have heard from Michael about what it was like to kiss David, and everything about how this came about could not be more perfect.

I love that it was a question from a fan, instead of a print or TV interview. Knowing how Michael has interacted with the fandom for the last five years, I would fully expect him to give the cheekiest (and most honest) answer to a fan instead of an interviewer. It's probably also what he's wanted to scream out on Twitter since last July, but couldn't because of the Writers' Strike and then the subsequent fandom drama that occurred in late October.

His answer absolutely blows me away, for so many reasons. That you can just hear "It's everything you've dreamed of" so distinctly in his voice, for one. But also that it's gorgeous because Michael is giving away so much by saying so little. It's that he was being a complete tease with that soft chuckle (as the second fan mentioned) and by letting us imagine more than he told us--and also seemingly very purposely not stopping us from imagining it.

Also, the use of "you dreamed of" instead of "I dreamed of" almost seems deliberate, as if Michael used to dream about kissing David but hasn't had to for a long time because he's kissed him many times before. (It also made me wonder if that was a sly reference to those of us who have thought about Michael and David kissing, and the fact that Michael knows so many of us have thought about it. I'm probably completely wrong, but I feel oddly and unexpectedly seen at the moment. Haha.)

I am just delighted that someone finally asked him that, though. I think we've been dying for it, but also likely not as much as Michael has been dying for it. And how amazing would it be if this is what leads him back to Twitter to engage with the fandom and share a few more juicy tidbits that he's been keeping under wraps. Fingers crossed...

[asherlockstudy]

Today's More was like the opening of a fanfic!

“Spank me… for the comedy of course. And the views. Ha ha. It doesn’t mean… I am horny for you” 😂😂😂

Someone has to write the thing!

By the way, I just love Rhett in these sexually charged situations even when they are silly and funny. As always he was so earnestly excited by his idea for spanking and then Link’s voluntary call, his cream and peeps drooped, the microphone fell inside his pants, he’s so thirsty he gets entirely disarrayed I always find it weirdly endearing idk why 😂

[badaziraphaletakes]

Hall of Fame bad take for y'all today:

*In fact, he chose not dying over dying. He chose the only way for them to have a "potential future".

In the words of Crowley:

Thanks @unforgivablengk for the submission!

[unforgivablengk]

Posted these on blsky (not telling this app) and Twicrtter (unforgivablengk) for @neil-gaiman's birthday! Enjoy everyone!

[captainfairygodmother]

Thanks for the tag @livrere-green!

[...]

Show the way

I'm coming wait for me

I hear the walls repeating

The falling of our feet and

It sounds like drumming

And we are not alone

I hear the rocks and stones

Echoing our song

I'm coming (coming, coming)

No Pressure Tags: @bluebooks1 @capvers-my-love @buylouisespleasingcheese @unforgivablengk and anyone else who would like to participate!

reblog w the song lyrics in your head NOW. either stuck in yr head or what yr listening to

[ingravinoveritas]

What do you make of David sayin he’s an ally, not an active participant (in queer subcultures)?

Did he come out as straight? I’m not sure anyone has ever asked him directly, not that he needs to give any explanations, I’m just curious because he gives off such a queer vibe even when he’s been married forever.

https://www.attitude.co.uk/culture/david-tennant-on-the-spice-girls-spiceworld-movie-was-being-developed-before-they-even-released-a-single-459815/

Oh, my Asks/DMs have been blowing up over this one. I did have a chance to read this interview with David (is it me, or is he doing nonstop press lately?) and...wow. Definitely enjoyable, and noticeably more unhinged/queer than most of his other interviews (which makes sense, given that Attitude is an LGBTQ-focused publication). But let's get a screenshot up of the most talked about bit, so we can discuss:

Obviously there is a lot going on here, so I'm just going to go with what stood out to me most. I don't think there is anything in the world less surprising than David naming bears first, given certain preferences of his (which I've discussed several times previously on my blog).

What's really interesting though is that the question was asking about queer subcultures, but all of the ones David listed are used primarily (AFAIK, though someone please do correct me if I am wrong) in mlm/gay male relationships. "Queer" can be many things, after all--gay, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, ace--and yet when David heard "queer subcultures" he specifically went for the mlm/gay ones, and that definitely feels like an interesting choice.

The second thing that I felt was worth discussing is that a lot of the reactions I've seen to this is people saying how adorably clueless David is, or how "he's a little confused, but he's got the spirit." And I'm sort of perplexed by this because we are talking about an almost 53-year-old man here, and I believe he knows damn well what all of those terms/subcultures are.

It's been brought to my attention (from what I would consider a very trustworthy source) that David is not at all as technologically illiterate as he pretends to be. Instead, it's actually part of a persona that he puts on to avoid dealing with issues that would arise from people knowing he is online. I had an inkling of this just from Georgia saying David was the one who set up all the equipment for when they filmed Staged at home (because why would such a task be put in the hands of someone who is hopeless with technology?). But having this confirmed also aligns with David creating a fake personal assistant in the early days of his career so he wouldn't have to fulfill certain social obligations, and to put a barrier between his real self and the world.

So why, then, wouldn't the same pattern possibly apply here?

I know there also tends to be this image of David as a "bumbling, goofy dad" type, and that's definitely part of him and what makes him so charming. But I don't think he is a fool, either--especially not after listening to him talk about Shakespeare or politics or anything else at length--and I think he certainly knows how to answer these types of questions. I think David is more than clever enough to give answers that are cheeky but not revealing, because he knows the purpose of all this is to promote the BAFTAs, not to be a deep, probing exposé on the life and times of David Tennant.

Which then brings me to the big, gay elephant standing in the middle of the room--a.k.a., "I'm an ally rather than an active participant." (Again...so many interesting word choices going on here, and none of it feels like an accident.)

Going back to what I mentioned about the focus of these interviews, I'd like to point out one notable thing that David himself said in the Radio Times interview earlier this week:

This, I think, sums up what we are seeing in all of these interviews: The version of David that he feels is safe to present to the world. He makes it clear as well that he is not going to reveal areas of his personal life while up on stage, and I would say that the same thing applies to these interviews. (It also speaks volumes that in the year 2024, the version of himself he feels safe presenting in these interviews is one who fully knows what bears and twinks--sorry, twinkies--are.)

So no, I don't think David is coming out as straight. I don't think he's coming out as anything, in fact, because he knows these interviews are not the place for that to happen. And I think that saying he is an ally but not an active participant makes the most sense as an answer for a public interview, but neither that nor being in a straight-passing relationship necessarily makes him any less potentially queer.

To reiterate what I said above, there is no one way to be queer. For some people, being queer absolutely can mean going to leather bars and participating in subcultures. But for other people, "queer" can mean something very different. It can mean being a Kinsey 2 just floating along doing your thing until you meet that one person who changes everything. The person who makes you go, "I've usually been more into this and not as much into this...but I'm definitely into you." It can mean being attracted to/falling for someone--a co-star, maybe?--that you never expected to feel that way about. And if David is queer, maybe that also means not shying away from anything, but at the same time not wanting to take the spotlight off the awards and the nominees celebrating one of the most important nights of their lives.

Those are my thoughts on the Attitude interview and David's answers, at any rate. Happy as always to hear from my followers with your takes. Thank you for writing in! x

[asherlockstudy]

Did you see the loft video on the society????!

I am not in the society but I was well informed about it by a friend!

I assume the moment you are interested more here is the "if I lost the ticket to heaven, so did you"?

My thoughts about it in bullet points:

Just another time they bring up religion / heaven & hell without it being necessary. I am not buying Rhett is completely over his past self. They mention religion at least once per week and Rhett spends a huge part of his free time reading or listening to podcasts about it.

I am sure you know what I believe Link meant by saying Rhett lost his chance to go to heaven. Note the finality in it, it's not like Rhett can repent or return to the faith. They phrase this as if it's something that can not be undone and they also do not regret. So... you know what I believe.

You know this is a sensitive topic for Rhett, even when it is mentioned for fun like it was here, so he's quick to point out that "If I lost the ticket to heaven, then you lost it too". It is a tandem jump, like it will be in the new show too.

It’s interesting that Rhett initially thinks it’s not true that he lost his ticket to heaven. First of all, are these two guys truly irreligious or non-Christian now? ‘Cause they talk about little else 😅 Anyway, his initial denial in my opinion comes down to the fact that he still explores all themes of Christianity, he consumes all content, all diverse interpretations of it, he looks for answers. I have said it before, I don’t believe his basic reason for abandoning the faith was the evolution and scientific achievements not adding up. The main reason was probably even for him what Link said it was about himself; that the religion was closing the door to certain kinds of love. Rhett has described himself as a hopeful agnostic, which means he would want to return, once he finds the answers he seeks. In other words, they abandoned their faith so that it would not abandon them first (like a “you are not kicking me out, I am leaving on my own” type of thing) and at least Rhett would probably return to it if he knew he truly would be accepted in the way he is.

Another interesting thing is that there is a mutual blaming following. Rhett's response bites a little, he says "If I lost it, then you lost it too. How do YOU feel about that?", I sense a slight bitterness in there, a veiled accusation. And Link promptly mutters "'t is your fault, 't is your fault". So he responds with an accusation that it was Rhett's fault they both lost heaven. Link’s response is the most baffling to me, unless he just instinctively responded to Rhett’s implied accusation in the same way, without thinking it much. It baffles me because like I have explained in my analysis posts, it always seemed like Link would be the one to be initially “blamed” between the two. Unless Link considers Rhett’s existence the whole culprit for Link’s feelings ���deviating”, you know. But most likely it was just instinctively deflecting and returning the blame… Unless we have gotten something that wrong and Rhett was the initiator. This would actually be in character for him, however based on all their scripts and previous discussions, it just does not seem to have been the case. Surprisingly, it seems it was Link. So, Link’s response here was a little odd.

You know, they have talked about the same thing before but it landed on a different conclusion - that of ending up in heaven (by God’s mistake). This is a transcript from the notorious GMMORE #1904 with the Valentine compliments.

Link: I love remembering the time we died together; this is heaven.

Rhett: ……. Oh wow. Because I killed you and you killed me?

Link: Yeah, right. Right. We killed each other. I don’t think you go to heaven when you kill your friend.

Rhett: No, if you kill each other at exactly the right time, God doesn’t have time to make a decision and he’s like “Okay!”. (laughs)

Link: (laughing but somewhat meaningfully) Good ol’ God.

Rhett: (laughs harder) Yeah, that’s how it works. You gotta kill each other, you gotta die at exactly the same time, he’s like “Ah they cancel each other out, let them in”.

Link: (still more meaningful about it) How are we gonna do that, I wonder?

Rhett: How are we gonna kill each other?

Link: Yes…. I think we need a spike and we both need to run at it.

Rhett: No, you know the thing in, it’s the pressurised CO2 thing in that Cohen Brothers movie “No Country For Old Men”, that they kill the cows with?

Link: You are talking about a cattle prod.

(…)

This is about the same thing. Link mentions as something he loved remembering doing with Rhett “dying together” - and their present at the time was their heaven, according to him. Of course, Rhett makes the discussion sillier and tries to come up with the mechanics it would take to actually be in the heaven after such a thing. Link, who’s more serious about this, plays along but only to press out of Rhett an answer regarding how they could kill each other at the same time (they use future tense, however in the beginning Link used the past sense; the mutual killing had already happened). Link was hoping for an enlightening comparison there and they both offered it. Link compared their mutual killing to both running together onto a spike and Rhett compared it to Bardem’s prod in the movie and he commented later that they both should attach each end of it to their foreheads. They both came up with an elongated thing that penetrated them one way or another. This was how they killed each other and died together and their lived reality at the time was their heaven but in a future discussion about the real heaven the very same thing is what prevents them from entering it.

In the loft video, they talk about the real heaven and they don’t equate it to their present life so Link reasons Rhett has lost this heaven. Rhett then exposes the similarities to the conversation above, saying that the “missing the heaven” situation is completely mutual and they exchange blames for it, exactly like - you made me lose heaven, - no you did. You killed me. No, you killed me.

[ingravinoveritas]

Heheh

Grouping these all together because a whole bunch of things happened today and there is a lot to talk about. For those who haven't seen, Georgia posted an Insta story of the sunset, which was followed by an extremely similar picture/Insta story from AL about an hour later. Shortly after that, Anna posted another story of Lyra and Birdie baking side by side, which Georgia also reshared:

Right off the bat, one thing in particular stood out about AL's story: Her using the hashtag #bakingwithsheenant, which differs from the tags she and Georgia normally use (#Sheenbergnants or something to that effect). It especially caught my attention because "Sheenant" is one of the ship names used in the fandom for Michael/David (though it is not a term I normally use). AL could have easily been referring to Lyra and Birdie in the photo, of course, but...of all the portmanteaus and hashtags AL could have chosen, she went with that one, and all I can say is that if it was nothing more than a fluke, then it was one hell of a fluke for her to make.

As if all this weren't enough, however, we then have what @phantomstars24 has mentioned, which is another story that Georgia shared just a little while ago:

To what was said in the Asks above, if this is true, it would absolutely mean that Michael and David are also neighbors, and that my head feels like it's slightly melting. Because there is no way in hell Michael bought a house in London next to David by accident. A meteorite has a better chance of hitting the Earth and bringing back the dinosaurs as our reptilian overlords than that does of being an accident.

Also if Michael and David are together as part of some poly arrangement, I can't think of a better way for them to ensure that they can see each other all the time. The number of possibilities are limitless: Random sleepovers, snuggling on the couch for movie date night, unwinding with a glass of red wine after they've had a long day doing their respective plays. Thinking as well of how we saw Michael and David looking at each other at opening night of Macbeth, now the chances of them going home together afterward have shot up by about a million, and I can hardly get my mind around it. I mean...dear God...

As for Georgia's "So linked!" sounding sarcastic, I could definitely see that as sarcasm. The sunset pictures from earlier seemed very planned, and even more so once we saw the baking picture. I saw some reactions from fans calling AL and Georgia "besties" once the Insta stories were posted, but I'm not exactly sure how those posts make them besties. The way Georgia posts about Anna is entirely different from how she posts about Jennie Fava, whom we know actually is one of Georgia's longtime best friends, so that difference makes it difficult for me to see why people see Georgia/AL in that light.

And if they are frequently getting together because of that proximity/because it is easier for Michael and David to have one house to themselves while AL, Georgia, and the kids are in another, I could see some degree of resentment existing on Georgia's end, especially if she feels like more of a babysitter than anything else. It's difficult to say for certain, of course, but we also have so many instances now of Anna copying Georgia on social media that I would imagine it has started to feel like a bit of a "me and my shadow" routine.

In any case, we have a lot of little pieces here that only give us a small glimpse at the whole, but boy, are they some very interesting pieces indeed. I think what strikes me most about all of this is that these stories also allude to Michael and David spending time together, yet we never actually see any pictures of them. (I have an Ask related to this waiting in my inbox, so I will expand more on that in a bit.) But we are being given room to think that, and to draw certain conclusions as a result, and I think both Georgia and AL know that and seemingly do not have a problem with it.

So yes, those are my thoughts on all the developments from today. Glad as always to hear from my followers and what your thoughts are on all this...

[celestialcrowley]

Ahhhhhh thank you @sparrowsortadrawzzz!!! 💚

@ineffabildaddy @sad-chaos-goblin @phoen1xr0se @ineffablemoist @belladonna413 @emotional-support-demon-crowley @crowleybrekkers @scarecrowcloud @bildads-shoes @muriel-not-the-dim-one @tragic-cosmic-magic @crowleysgoat @azirapalalalala @aziraphalalala @fruitomens @fellshish @floralomens @jackinistafflower @justtofollowgaiman @martinsharmony @notagoodlad @pretendygood @spot-o-bodysnatchin @peachworthy @peregrintook @rainbowpopeworld @sinnedbigly @skinnyscottishbloke @unforgivablengk @wearecrowley @xxxtosoxxx @suzypfonne @shadesofecclescakes @ritz-writes @apocalypticginger-blog

2023 is coming to an end so this is my annual I love my online friends so fucking much you wouldn't believe me if I told you post.

[ingravinoveritas]

Oh, boy. Well, I've had a few people show this to me today, and again, it's...yeah. A lot.

The first thing that caught my notice is that this picture seems to be from the outing Michael and AL did with Georgia and David last weekend at Lapland UK (if the matching Christmas sweaters and Michael's furry hat are any indication, at least). Why a picture from then was posted today instead of a current one, I'm not sure, but I did think that was an interesting choice.

The second thing that came to mind is something I probably don't even need to say because it seems like others are noticing it, to where I saw folks on Twitter actually commenting, "Why does he look so tired and unhappy?" It sort of boggles my mind that Anna would post a picture where this is so visibly the case, but then it's also not surprising, because it seems like yet another instance of her making sure that her hair/makeup is on point while seemingly not caring whether Michael looks good in the picture. And again, the "husky" comment would hit a lot differently if it weren't for Anna's Insta story from a month ago comparing him to a dog. As it is, it feels like another passive-aggressive jab at Michael's appearance, which as we know by now is something AL has done many times over.

But what really struck me about this picture is that she posted it shortly after Georgia posted a Christmas Eve photo of her and David. When we look at that picture--as well as the picture of Michael and David that was also taken at Lapland last weekend--the difference is stark:

All I can say is that two of these three pictures look and feel like couples...and one of them distinctly doesn't.

David's expression is so soft in the picture with Georgia, he's leaning in to her, and you can feel the connection between them and that they are a combined "unit." Michael is utterly beaming in the picture with David and leaning in to him with his whole body. Yet in the picture with Anna, it's very much a case of them standing near each other but not at all being in the same place. It also almost looks as if Michael was doing something else and she insisted on a selfie, and this was the end result. Again, if we contrast all of that to the selfie Georgia took with David, the difference truly is night and day. I don't know what that may mean (if it means anything at all), but I'm genuinely baffled at AL's decision to post that picture.

The one other intriguing piece of all this is Georgia's comment, which we can see in the screenshot above. I've had a few folks DMing me saying they think it could be an indication of some sort of poly arrangement (that "better halves" means Georgia is referring to AL as her better half, and referring to Michael as David's better half). Whether this is remotely true is something only the four of them would know, but if nothing else, I do think the wording is just ambiguous enough to make one wonder.

So yes, those are my thoughts on this new picture. Happy for folks to weigh in and share their reactions in the comments, as always, and I will keep doing my best to get through the backlog of Asks still in my inbox...

[ingravinoveritas]

Okay but is it a good thing for people to look at your family Christmas photo and say that it looks photoshopped and edited? Just wondering since so many people have that same thought over on twitter who believe that Georgia and Anna were edited in

It's been so overwhelming to see the response to these new pics. I am sure probably everyone has seen them by now, but I will put up the visual just in case:

I think I would agree with you that, in the most general sense, saying that someone's family Christmas photo looks Photoshopped/edited is probably not a positive thing. In the interest of fairness, looking at the pictures of the other people who were photographed at the event, it does seem like it was a problem with the lighting or editing overall that is affecting every photo, not just these pictures.

One thing I want to be clear on is that I think it's absolutely precious that Michael and David did this outing together, and are spending so much time together overall while Michael is in London. We had an inkling of that up until this point, but we literally went from a blurry photo to Michael and David gazing at each other across a crowded room on press night for Macbeth, to...this...in the span of less than a month. And I am glad that their kids are getting to spend time together and enjoy all of these holiday festivities as well. It's all very sweet and lovely, and in no way is it my intention to diminish that.

Thinking about the matching sweaters (jumpers), this is where I start to feel slightly less enthusiastic. It seems that the jumpers were Georgia's idea, which makes sense, as she previously had everyone wearing matching sweaters for a viewing party for "The Star Beast" (the first DW 60th anniversary episode). But having sweaters for Michael, AL, Lyra, and Mabli isn't an accident, or something that happens on the fly--it has to be planned. So for me, that makes it seem less like "spontaneous family outing" and more like "planned photo op meant to garner publicity."

What particularly gets me is that the both the matching sweaters for DW and the matching sweaters here feels like a gimmick...but Michael and David have never needed a "gimmick." Because Michael and David just being themselves has always been enough to be memorable. I'm not sure if Georgia thought she needed a gimmick to make herself and Anna stand out or what, but to me it almost feels like the sweaters are a diversion. As if Georgia perhaps knew the four them in a photo together would look awkward, so what better way to deflect than to give everyone something else to talk about. (Perhaps the same could also be said for Michael's hat, which...why, Michael? Haha.)

But it seems that Georgia's idea worked, because right after these pictures came out, an article was published about them in the Daily Mail. So all of this put together does give that feeling of being planned, especially because the four of them were so much the focal point of the DM article, more than any of the other celebrities at the event.

This brings me back to the aforementioned photos. Again, what seemed notable to me wasn't just what we did see, but what we didn't: No photo of Michael and Anna together, nor of David and Georgia, and not one of Georgia and AL, either. Instead, we have this group photo (where no one is actually touching and Georgia and AL's arms are awkwardly hanging side by side), and a photo of Michael and David where they are, with their arms around each other and Michael leaning into David, in contrast to his much stiffer posture in the group photo.

Looking at the Getty Images page, all of the other twosome photos are of couples, and none of them have the same unusual energy as Michael/David/Georgia/AL's group photo. So I do wonder if the fans pointing out the "Photoshopped" nature of the picture (and specifically that Georgia and AL appear to be edited in) have ever considered that maybe that is just how Georgia and AL look together. Because we're not talking about Staged, or social media posts. This is them, face to face, in real life, and the difference between Georgia and AL vs. Michael and David just seems pretty striking.

(I am also aware that there was another family photo that Georgia posted in an Insta story, and it is an incredibly cute picture, but I will say that what struck me is how Georgia and AL are pressed close together, but there is a very noticeable amount of space between Anna and David, and he seems to be giving off a lot of 'closed' body language (one hand in his lap, one folded behind him). Make of that what you will...)

So yes, those are my thoughts on the new pictures. I would love to hear any observations that anyone else has, of course, so feel free to share your thoughts in the comments. Thanks for writing in! x

[asherlockstudy]

Not Jordan saying they keep expecting one day to have a three-way kiss with Rhett and Link and probably not knowing the background bc they don't know much about the show lmaooooo And Rhett laughing at Link at the end for not liking marshmallows or bananas but in a quiet not out loud way

You mean the kiss through Stevie's hands, right? XDDD Hahah Jordan is living in ignorant bliss.

Yeah I noticed the cutesy affectionate smiles to himself whenever Link was saying something very Linky.

Also, in the main episode, watch Rhett closely when Link lays his head on his shoulder. He starts talking about the Koreatown, then Link puts his head on the shoulder and he cuts his sentence short, stops, then asks pointlessly if Link is still listening to him, just dragging the moment. Takes two audible breaths, then also asks him if he should be closer, swallows hard, then takes one final audible long breath in and finally is ready to cope and go on with what he's saying. Like, WOW

[asherlockstudy]

Link in the egg teaser?????!

I know............... we're in for a treat

[asherlockstudy]

I was tagged by @waugh-bao thank you ❤️

rules: without naming them, post 10 gifs of your favorite shows, then tag 10 people

Last 3 from my country you probably don’t know them but I love them so much it makes me sick you don’t understand

I can’t believe I couldn’t find a gif for the last one which might as well be my very favourite from all the list so I will cheat and add an image

Tagging: @birdylion @mpay22 @jula483 @purple-amaranthe @bluntforceyearning @lallyloo @unhinged-nymph @whatnext2020 @measuringbliss @unforgivablengk

[ineffable-rohese]

Tone is hard to read on the internet. For example, my original post was a silly post joking about David Tennant's otherworldly qualities, with a subtext of "are we sure he's not queer?", coming from a silly conversation between queer woman and her queer NB spouse with limited knowledge of DT outside of his acting roles. The "I know he's not" should be read with a heavy dose of skepticism.

I'm saying this because, and I'm hoping it wasn't your intent, @unforgivablengk , you're coming across as really aggressive and straight up rude in your reply.

If you are trying to get across that it's societal BS that we assume people are straight until proven otherwise, I agree wholeheartedly! In fact, my top post on my blog (coincidentally from later the same day as this post) is this one where I make that exact argument (possibly in the tags, idk, it was a month ago), in the context of my decision to read DT as queer until he says something else. Somewhere I have another post about how having to come out is an undue burden and we should allow people to tell us who they are without requiring a press conference (but also that people are allowed their privacy and not to have other people bothering them).

But it feels like you are calling my spouse (who is so offline it's funny, so you're trying to argue with someone who isn't even in the room) heterosexist and homophobic because we had a silly exchange a month ago that wasn't perfectly stated to your expectations.

I guess just maybe don't assume the least charitable take on something?

My spouse (who is a casual GO and Dr. Who fan) about DT: I know he's not, but he just seems queer. There's something queer about him.

Me: I mean, he hasn't said anything, but at this point... He can't even sit straight.

Spouse: Are we sure he's even human?

Me: No. No we are not.

[captainfairygodmother]

It took me an embarrassingly long time to find out how to make a poll...

Anyway

No Pressure Tags: @bluebooks1 @auldsusie @livrere-green @capvers-my-love @unforgivablengk and anyone else who wants to join!

tagged by @hyenagirlbulge smile

Challenge: make a poll with five of your all time favorite characters, and then tag five people to do the same. See which character is everyone's favorite!

i tag ummmm . @calabrithedragon @chihirolovebot @nexfarious @enby-berries do it if you want : )