#uk mobile app designer

[reputablesoftwaresolutions]

Best Web and Software Solutions Personalized for Your Company

Today, it's crucial for any business to have a strong online presence in the digital age. IT Solution company offers web and software solutions to help your business stand out and succeed, whether you're a small business owner or part of a large company. It creates websites and software that are tailored to your specific needs.

Software Solutions team of skilled developers is dedicated to building solutions that work for you. It uses the latest technology to design websites that look great and function smoothly. Whether you need a new website, an e-commerce platform, or a custom software application, we can make it happen.

Software Solutions understands that every business is unique, so we take the time to learn about your goals and challenges to create software solutions that match your vision. Its websites and software are designed not just to look good, but to drive real results for your business.

Its focus is on creating easy-to-use and secure solutions. Your customers will have a great experience when they visit your website, and software will help you run your business more efficiently. Additionally, Software Solutions are designed to grow your business and continue to meet your needs as you expand.

It provides ongoing support to ensure everything runs smoothly. As your business grows, we'll be there to update and improve your digital tools so you can keep focusing on what you do best.

[mobiosolutions]

Are you on a mission to fast-track your React Native development journey? We have just the resource you need! Our latest blog deepens & unveils the power of pre-built components and how they can help you save time, reduce errors, and achieve a seamless UI faster than you can say "React Native." Discover your next favorite library and transform your development process! Let's redefine the code together.

[equalinfotech]

Choosing the Right Mobile App Development Company in India

The rapid growth of mobile technology has significantly transformed how businesses operate. With millions of apps available on various platforms, having a mobile app is no longer a luxury but a necessity for businesses aiming to reach a broader audience. However, the success of a mobile app largely depends on the expertise and skills of the development team behind it. This brings us to the critical question: How do you choose the right Mobile App development company in India?

See More

[squarerootsolutions]

Square Root Solutions Hit Another Yearly Milestone of Converting Ideas to Digital Reality

In this competitive era of the digital world, Square Root Solutions has continuously proved its mark for many years as a leading mobile app development company in UK. Thriving in this digital landscape, the company is transforming ideas into digital products for SMEs, startups, and established businesses using high-end technologies and professional experts.

[brandfelltechnologies]

How Brandfell Sets Us Apart from Other Digital Marketing Agency in UK

In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, finding the right partner for your digital marketing needs is crucial. With numerous options to choose from, it can be challenging to pinpoint the Best Digital Marketing Agency UK that aligns with your business goals. That’s where Brandfell shines as a beacon of excellence. As a Top Digital Marketing Agency in UK, Brandfell offers a level of expertise, innovation, and dedication that sets us apart from the competition. Read more....

[seoworkssss]

Unveiling Excellence: Top Companies for Digital Solutions

In today’s dynamic digital landscape, finding the right technology partner is crucial for businesses looking to thrive. Whether you’re based in the bustling tech hubs of the United States, the design-centric streets of Denmark, or the precision-driven environment of Switzerland and France, having a reliable mobile app and web development company by your side is a game-changer. Let’s explore some of the best in the business.

1. Best Mobile Apps Company in the USA

The United States is home to a myriad of tech companies, but when it comes to mobile app development, only a few stand out from the rest. [Company Name] leads the pack, offering innovative solutions that blend functionality and aesthetics seamlessly. With a track record of delivering cutting-edge mobile apps for various industries, they have earned their reputation as the go-to mobile app development company in the USA.

Algorithm Digital Inc is a leading website design and development company, offering its services of the highest quality and the lowest price. We are concrete makers as well as doers who feel affection for constructing as well as shaping brands that set the test of time.

At Algorithm Digital Inc, we have a team of strategically led and creatively driven thinkers who split a common desire to assist businesses to make their dreams true, make development and transform them into brands people respect and would like to connect with.

2. Web Development Company in Denmark

Known for its design-centric approach and a thriving tech scene, Denmark is a hotspot for web development. Algorithm Digital Inc takes the spotlight as the top web development company in Denmark. Their commitment to creating user-centric websites that not only look stunning but also perform flawlessly sets them apart. Collaborating with this company ensures that your online presence is not just a website but a digital experience.

Algorithm Digital Inc is an integrated and innovative creative web design agency. We have a brilliant team of an exciting blend of artistic as well as intelligent professionals. Each professional in our team has highly developed logical, analytical, as well as cognitive abilities. Most determined companies, industry innovators, as well as quality-required organizations work with us to make their digital communications in a professional as well as in an affordable way.

At Algorithm Digital Inc constructed website will present an industry leader efficiently, attractively emphasizing accomplishments with the correct blend of style, dignity, and sophistication.

3. Web Developer in Switzerland

Switzerland, a country renowned for precision and innovation, demands web developers who embody these qualities. Algorithm Digital Inc, a leading web developer in Switzerland, is known for crafting bespoke digital solutions that align with the Swiss commitment to excellence. From e-commerce platforms to complex web applications, they excel in translating ideas into flawless digital experiences.

At Algorithm Digital Inc, we create promotion collaterals, make web existence, promote merchandise and services for pharmaceuticals, industrial titans, IT giants, hospitality sectors, and e-Commerce enterprises through our SEO services, digital promotion services, and web design and development services.

At our web design agency, we combine our strategizing abilities with design and expertise to allow communication, which is effective, innovative, as well as imposing. We shape faultless communications for targeted spectators through numerous devices and bring combined experiences through user-focused creative solutions according to your strategic goals.

4. Mobile App Development Company in France

France, a hub of culture and creativity, seeks mobile app developers who can bring ideas to life. Algorithm Digital Inc takes center stage as the premier mobile app development company in the country. Their approach combines innovation and functionality, resulting in apps that not only meet but exceed user expectations. Partnering with them means stepping into the future of mobile technology.

Conclusion

In the fast-evolving world of technology, choosing the right mobile app and web development partner is pivotal for success. Whether you’re in the USA, Denmark, Switzerland, or France, these companies have proven themselves as leaders in their respective domains. Investing in their expertise is not just a business decision; it’s a step towards a digital future where innovation and excellence reign supreme.

[whizsolutions]

Mobile App Development Company London 

[v1technologies-blr]

Whether your iPhone app design is aimed at businesses or consumers, V1 Technologies can blow life to your app vision with our creativity, industry knowledge, and technical expertise. We combine the latest iPhone app development technology with user experience to help you achieve ROI, lasting beyond a few business cycles. Our iPhone app designers and developers have the right knowledge and expertise to create compelling and scalable iPhone apps that can be integrated seamlessly into your existing IT models.

[ambientechs]

Hire perfect fitting dedicated Developers from an in-house team

Hire dedicated Developers & Designers From Ambientechs in India for Web, Mobile, PWA, OpenSource & Consulting.

​At Ambientechs, We provide facility to get a perfect fitting candidate for your each purpose.

A specialized software development team can have clear insights for the project archive with good cooperation. Upgrade your team with hire top skilled developers from Ambientechs. ​Based on our 10+ years or experience, we can assure you that our performance improves your project efficiency, quality and timeline.

Ambientechs provides staff for specialized development projects to the demands of any type of organization. Our entire hired team is focused only on the client's project. Our dedicated team performs better with a team that enhances the quality of work for your project and getting honest results.

For more information visit here : https://www.ambientechs.com/services/dedicated-teams

[mostlysignssomeportents]

How to design a tech regulation

TONIGHT (June 20) I'm live onstage in LOS ANGELES for a recording of the GO FACT YOURSELF podcast. TOMORROW (June 21) I'm doing an ONLINE READING for the LOCUS AWARDS at 16hPT. On SATURDAY (June 22) I'll be in OAKLAND, CA for a panel (13hPT) and a keynote (18hPT) at the LOCUS AWARDS.

It's not your imagination: tech really is underregulated. There are plenty of avoidable harms that tech visits upon the world, and while some of these harms are mere negligence, others are self-serving, creating shareholder value and widespread public destruction.

Making good tech policy is hard, but not because "tech moves too fast for regulation to keep up with," nor because "lawmakers are clueless about tech." There are plenty of fast-moving areas that lawmakers manage to stay abreast of (think of the rapid, global adoption of masking and social distancing rules in mid-2020). Likewise we generally manage to make good policy in areas that require highly specific technical knowledge (that's why it's noteworthy and awful when, say, people sicken from badly treated tapwater, even though water safety, toxicology and microbiology are highly technical areas outside the background of most elected officials).

That doesn't mean that technical rigor is irrelevant to making good policy. Well-run "expert agencies" include skilled practitioners on their payrolls – think here of large technical staff at the FTC, or the UK Competition and Markets Authority's best-in-the-world Digital Markets Unit:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/13/kitbashed/#app-store-tax

The job of government experts isn't just to research the correct answers. Even more important is experts' role in evaluating conflicting claims from interested parties. When administrative agencies make new rules, they have to collect public comments and counter-comments. The best agencies also hold hearings, and the very best go on "listening tours" where they invite the broad public to weigh in (the FTC has done an awful lot of these during Lina Khan's tenure, to its benefit, and it shows):

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events/2022/04/ftc-justice-department-listening-forum-firsthand-effects-mergers-acquisitions-health-care

But when an industry dwindles to a handful of companies, the resulting cartel finds it easy to converge on a single talking point and to maintain strict message discipline. This means that the evidentiary record is starved for disconfirming evidence that would give the agencies contrasting perspectives and context for making good policy.

Tech industry shills have a favorite tactic: whenever there's any proposal that would erode the industry's profits, self-serving experts shout that the rule is technically impossible and deride the proposer as "clueless."

This tactic works so well because the proposers sometimes are clueless. Take Europe's on-again/off-again "chat control" proposal to mandate spyware on every digital device that will screen everything you upload for child sex abuse material (CSAM, better known as "child pornography"). This proposal is profoundly dangerous, as it will weaken end-to-end encryption, the key to all secure and private digital communication:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/18/encryption-is-deeply-threatening-to-power-meredith-whittaker-of-messaging-app-signal

It's also an impossible-to-administer mess that incorrectly assumes that killing working encryption in the two mobile app stores run by the mobile duopoly will actually prevent bad actors from accessing private tools:

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/09/04/oh-for-fucks-sake-not-this-fucking-bullshit-again-cryptography-edition/

When technologists correctly point out the lack of rigor and catastrophic spillover effects from this kind of crackpot proposal, lawmakers stick their fingers in their ears and shout "NERD HARDER!"

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/01/12/nerd-harder-fbi-director-reiterates-faith-based-belief-in-working-crypto-that-he-can-break/

But this is only half the story. The other half is what happens when tech industry shills want to kill good policy proposals, which is the exact same thing that advocates say about bad ones. When lawmakers demand that tech companies respect our privacy rights – for example, by splitting social media or search off from commercial surveillance, the same people shout that this, too, is technologically impossible.

That's a lie, though. Facebook started out as the anti-surveillance alternative to Myspace. We know it's possible to operate Facebook without surveillance, because Facebook used to operate without surveillance:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3247362

Likewise, Brin and Page's original Pagerank paper, which described Google's architecture, insisted that search was incompatible with surveillance advertising, and Google established itself as a non-spying search tool:

http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf

Even weirder is what happens when there's a proposal to limit a tech company's power to invoke the government's powers to shut down competitors. Take Ethan Zuckerman's lawsuit to strip Facebook of the legal power to sue people who automate their browsers to uncheck the millions of boxes that Facebook requires you to click by hand in order to unfollow everyone:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/02/kaiju-v-kaiju/#cda-230-c-2-b

Facebook's apologists have lost their minds over this, insisting that no one can possibly understand the potential harms of taking away Facebook's legal right to decide how your browser works. They take the position that only Facebook can understand when it's safe and proportional to use Facebook in ways the company didn't explicitly design for, and that they should be able to ask the government to fine or even imprison people who fail to defer to Facebook's decisions about how its users configure their computers.

This is an incredibly convenient position, since it arrogates to Facebook the right to order the rest of us to use our computers in the ways that are most beneficial to its shareholders. But Facebook's apologists insist that they are not motivated by parochial concerns over the value of their stock portfolios; rather, they have objective, technical concerns, that no one except them is qualified to understand or comment on.

There's a great name for this: "scalesplaining." As in "well, actually the platforms are doing an amazing job, but you can't possibly understand that because you don't work for them." It's weird enough when scalesplaining is used to condemn sensible regulation of the platforms; it's even weirder when it's weaponized to defend a system of regulatory protection for the platforms against would-be competitors.

Just as there are no atheists in foxholes, there are no libertarians in government-protected monopolies. Somehow, scalesplaining can be used to condemn governments as incapable of making any tech regulations and to insist that regulations that protect tech monopolies are just perfect and shouldn't ever be weakened. Truly, it's impossible to get someone to understand something when the value of their employee stock options depends on them not understanding it.

None of this is to say that every tech regulation is a good one. Governments often propose bad tech regulations (like chat control), or ones that are technologically impossible (like Article 17 of the EU's 2019 Digital Single Markets Directive, which requires tech companies to detect and block copyright infringements in their users' uploads).

But the fact that scalesplainers use the same argument to criticize both good and bad regulations makes the waters very muddy indeed. Policymakers are rightfully suspicious when they hear "that's not technically possible" because they hear that both for technically impossible proposals and for proposals that scalesplainers just don't like.

After decades of regulations aimed at making platforms behave better, we're finally moving into a new era, where we just make the platforms less important. That is, rather than simply ordering Facebook to block harassment and other bad conduct by its users, laws like the EU's Digital Markets Act will order Facebook and other VLOPs (Very Large Online Platforms, my favorite EU-ism ever) to operate gateways so that users can move to rival services and still communicate with the people who stay behind.

Think of this like number portability, but for digital platforms. Just as you can switch phone companies and keep your number and hear from all the people you spoke to on your old plan, the DMA will make it possible for you to change online services but still exchange messages and data with all the people you're already in touch with.

I love this idea, because it finally grapples with the question we should have been asking all along: why do people stay on platforms where they face harassment and bullying? The answer is simple: because the people – customers, family members, communities – we connect with on the platform are so important to us that we'll tolerate almost anything to avoid losing contact with them:

https://locusmag.com/2023/01/commentary-cory-doctorow-social-quitting/

Platforms deliberately rig the game so that we take each other hostage, locking each other into their badly moderated cesspits by using the love we have for one another as a weapon against us. Interoperability – making platforms connect to each other – shatters those locks and frees the hostages:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

But there's another reason to love interoperability (making moderation less important) over rules that require platforms to stamp out bad behavior (making moderation better). Interop rules are much easier to administer than content moderation rules, and when it comes to regulation, administratability is everything.

The DMA isn't the EU's only new rule. They've also passed the Digital Services Act, which is a decidedly mixed bag. Among its provisions are a suite of rules requiring companies to monitor their users for harmful behavior and to intervene to block it. Whether or not you think platforms should do this, there's a much more important question: how can we enforce this rule?

Enforcing a rule requiring platforms to prevent harassment is very "fact intensive." First, we have to agree on a definition of "harassment." Then we have to figure out whether something one user did to another satisfies that definition. Finally, we have to determine whether the platform took reasonable steps to detect and prevent the harassment.

Each step of this is a huge lift, especially that last one, since to a first approximation, everyone who understands a given VLOP's server infrastructure is a partisan, scalesplaining engineer on the VLOP's payroll. By the time we find out whether the company broke the rule, years will have gone by, and millions more users will be in line to get justice for themselves.

So allowing users to leave is a much more practical step than making it so that they've got no reason to want to leave. Figuring out whether a platform will continue to forward your messages to and from the people you left there is a much simpler technical matter than agreeing on what harassment is, whether something is harassment by that definition, and whether the company was negligent in permitting harassment.

But as much as I like the DMA's interop rule, I think it is badly incomplete. Given that the tech industry is so concentrated, it's going to be very hard for us to define standard interop interfaces that don't end up advantaging the tech companies. Standards bodies are extremely easy for big industry players to capture:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/30/weak-institutions/

If tech giants refuse to offer access to their gateways to certain rivals because they seem "suspicious," it will be hard to tell whether the companies are just engaged in self-serving smears against a credible rival, or legitimately trying to protect their users from a predator trying to plug into their infrastructure. These fact-intensive questions are the enemy of speedy, responsive, effective policy administration.

But there's more than one way to attain interoperability. Interop doesn't have to come from mandates, interfaces designed and overseen by government agencies. There's a whole other form of interop that's far nimbler than mandates: adversarial interoperability:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/10/adversarial-interoperability

"Adversarial interoperability" is a catch-all term for all the guerrilla warfare tactics deployed in service to unilaterally changing a technology: reverse engineering, bots, scraping and so on. These tactics have a long and honorable history, but they have been slowly choked out of existence with a thicket of IP rights, like the IP rights that allow Facebook to shut down browser automation tools, which Ethan Zuckerman is suing to nullify:

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

Adversarial interop is very flexible. No matter what technological moves a company makes to interfere with interop, there's always a countermove the guerrilla fighter can make – tweak the scraper, decompile the new binary, change the bot's behavior. That's why tech companies use IP rights and courts, not firewall rules, to block adversarial interoperators.

At the same time, adversarial interop is unreliable. The solution that works today can break tomorrow if the company changes its back-end, and it will stay broken until the adversarial interoperator can respond.

But when companies are faced with the prospect of extended asymmetrical war against adversarial interop in the technological trenches, they often surrender. If companies can't sue adversarial interoperators out of existence, they often sue for peace instead. That's because high-tech guerrilla warfare presents unquantifiable risks and resource demands, and, as the scalesplainers never tire of telling us, this can create real operational problems for tech giants.

In other words, if Facebook can't shut down Ethan Zuckerman's browser automation tool in the courts, and if they're sincerely worried that a browser automation tool will uncheck its user interface buttons so quickly that it crashes the server, all it has to do is offer an official "unsubscribe all" button and no one will use Zuckerman's browser automation tool.

We don't have to choose between adversarial interop and interop mandates. The two are better together than they are apart. If companies building and operating DMA-compliant, mandatory gateways know that a failure to make them useful to rivals seeking to help users escape their authority is getting mired in endless hand-to-hand combat with trench-fighting adversarial interoperators, they'll have good reason to cooperate.

And if lawmakers charged with administering the DMA notice that companies are engaging in adversarial interop rather than using the official, reliable gateway they're overseeing, that's a good indicator that the official gateways aren't suitable.

It would be very on-brand for the EU to create the DMA and tell tech companies how they must operate, and for the USA to simply withdraw the state's protection from the Big Tech companies and let smaller companies try their luck at hacking new features into the big companies' servers without the government getting involved.

Indeed, we're seeing some of that today. Oregon just passed the first ever Right to Repair law banning "parts pairing" – basically a way of using IP law to make it illegal to reverse-engineer a device so you can fix it.

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/03/28/oregon-governor-kotek-signs-strong-tech-right-to-repair-bill/

Taken together, the two approaches – mandates and reverse engineering – are stronger than either on their own. Mandates are sturdy and reliable, but slow-moving. Adversarial interop is flexible and nimble, but unreliable. Put 'em together and you get a two-part epoxy, strong and flexible.

Governments can regulate well, with well-funded expert agencies and smart, adminstratable remedies. It's for that reason that the administrative state is under such sustained attack from the GOP and right-wing Dems. The illegitimate Supreme Court is on the verge of gutting expert agencies' power:

https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2024/05/us-supreme-court-may-soon-discard-or-modify-chevron-deference

It's never been more important to craft regulations that go beyond mere good intentions and take account of adminsitratability. The easier we can make our rules to enforce, the less our beleaguered agencies will need to do to protect us from corporate predators.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/20/scalesplaining/#administratability

Image: Noah Wulf (modified) https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thunderbirds_at_Attention_Next_to_Thunderbird_1_-_Aviation_Nation_2019.jpg

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

[scotianostra]

St Andrews Scottis dug at the bus station.

Scotties by the Sea features 30 giant Scottie Dog sculptures, forming a free, 10-week art trail of discovery for local people and visitors of all ages to explore and enjoy.

Each sculpture is sponsored by local businesses, community groups and education organisations. They are decorated by local artists and communities – all designed to celebrate our vibrant history, culture, and coastal heritage.

The sculptures are displayed in locations across St Andrews and along the Northeast Fife Coast, where visitors can use a bespoke map and mobile app to help them navigate the trail, discover new places and unlock exciting rewards and discounts provided by sponsors.

Following a farewell weekend where they will be shown together, the Scottie sculptures will be auctioned at a special event to raise funds that will support our charity partner, Maggie’s Everyone’s Home of Cancer Care – working locally and nationally providing free cancer support and information in centres across the UK and online. https://scottiesbythesea.com/art-trail/

[sdssoftwares12]

SEO services in Birmingham for link building

SEO services in Birmingham for link building focus on acquiring high-quality backlinks that enhance your site’s authority and visibility.

[vavuska]

I thought this one would be just another developer of mobile game that use The Sims 4 contents in its (fake) ads to fraud users by making people belive its game, when it has a completely different gameplay.

Unfortunately, Room Makover by FlyBird Casual Games is much more than this.

Room Makover has plenty of false ads. This time I actually tried the game, because the pictures and videos on Google Play were cute and I decided to give it a try.

I was so naive. Happens that the whole page on Google Play is full of fake contents.

It's just one of those mobile games in which you have to remove and match nails. Every time to finisce a leven, you will rewarded with bills that you can use to unlock part of a building under "makeover". You have just three option for every part of the building or the room to choose.

There is nothing creative. Not actual building or cluttering rooms or decoring.

As, always, since I'm a curious little bitch, I decided to dig further into this FlyBird Casual Game and... Oh. God. Their site looks even less legit than LUCKY FORTUNE GAMES' one!

It is just a void page. There is nothing here. NOTHING. The only two working section are the privacy and conditions of use, in which they try to convince you that they didn't have any liability for damages or fraud committed.

The privacy one is curious, because mentions this Commissioner's Office in UK and a long list of partners. Both for ads and for data collection, which is hugely uncommon for this kind of games.

Sooooo... In this magical list of apps, I noticed a few tech nightmares, which I will explain briefly here:

Aarki is an AI company that builds advertising solutions to drive mobile revenue growth. Traslated from bullshit: they use AI to generate fake ads and sells it to shady corps.

Blind Ferret is the big deal here! Not only gave you digital marketing solutions, data collection and analytics, but also pays influencers and product placement on social media to promote the game and, hear me out, CREATE fake ads too! It's literally written in their site: "Our Creative Services don’t just make things look pretty. Our team uses data to guide us! How do we make brands shine? By turning the arts into a numbers game with top-performing creative content." This include: Graphic Design, Illustration, 2D Animation, Video Editing and Composition, Copywriting and conceptualizing.

InMobi is a big Corp that does native advertising, which means promoted contents, collabs with influencers, etc.

Ironsource. This one is a fucking cancer. IronSource Ltd. is an Israeli software company that focuses on developing technologies for app monetization and distribution, with its core products focused on the app economy. That would sound harmless, but Samsung use it in its budget and midrange smartphone to install multiple third-party apps during the set-up process. This platform slips bloatware on the pretext of recommended apps, leading to apps clutter and reduction in on-board storage space. The only purpose it exists on Samsung phones is to download games without your consent with no way to remove it (no app installed).

Mintegral is another fucking tech nightmare. Not only poses serious threats to your privacy and datas, but also uses malicious codes to spy your activity and when you seem intentioned to install a mobile app, Mintegral’s software would then fire off fake clicks on non-existent ads to claim credit for the install and essentially collect a bounty from app publishers who pay ad networks to promote their apps.

Mistplay is one of those "play to earn bucks" that I find very very dangerous. Because YOUR data are their revenue.

Tapjoy does monetization of ads and also surveys, that force users to download one from a long list of games, download it and playing for hours or since it is gained some in-game prize. This surveys are rewarded with credits and user can spend on the mobile game they actually want to play. Tapjoy has a huge market among IMVU users, who need credits to buy piece of clothing and accessories for their avi.

The other apps do mobile app marketing, using data collection that allow shady corps to target more gullable and naive people to scam. Plus they do also monetization surveys to get money and at the same time forcefully grow the engagement of this shady corps.

Obviously, there is no user support mail listed in their Google Play page, but at least this has a contact mail listed on their website: flybirdgames2022@gmail.com

As always, stay safe and please tell me if you know more about everything above or know the person who create this build first.

Help people to stay safe.

Thank you.

<<< previous Coloring app use design of The Sims 4 build creating without the consent of the creators and other mobile developers steal TS4 speed build contents and claim it's the actual gameplay of their mobile game.

[l-a-i-b-a123]

Best Android App Development Companies in the USA and UK

Competitiveness demands dynamic, user-friendly, and interactive mobile software or apps. Android is regarded as the most user-friendly, easy, and opportune operating system throughout the world. It caters to a great deal of audience.

To seek competitiveness through Android application development services, partnering up with a renowned mobile app development company can solve your many problems and concerns. Through this article, we will broaden our horizons of Android app development companies in the USA and the UK.

Together, we will enlighten our readers about the capabilities, features, and services of these companies.   

Leading Android App Development Companies in the USA 

Intellectsoft 

Intellectsoft is the popular name of a mobile app development company that is headquartered in the USA. They specialize in the field or realm of mobile app development services, such as Android app development services.

Intellectsoft is known to bring innovation and client-centricity through its custom mobile apps. Their team consists of seasoned, hardworking, and experienced developers who are well-versed in constructing and conceiving high-performance, scalable, and secure Android applications with customization built in.  

Fueled 

Fueled is a reputable company, based in New York, and known for its android application development services. This Android application development company holds a reputation for delivering modern and cutting-edge mobile solutions and software.

With a wide array of offerings that include mobile application development services, initial concept and design capabilities, and development and post-launch support, they are making a mark in cross-platform app development too.

Their cross-platform app development support and services are what every business seeks to access. Their devotion and sincerity of work to deliver quality and user-centric design, give them a title of ideal company that knows how to make a significant impact with software solutions and mobile apps. 

WillowTree 

WillowTree stands tall as a prominent mobile application development company in the USA, and it has a reputation for its innovative solutions and exceptional customer service.

They provide impeccable end-to-end frameworks and Android app development services with a keen focus on functionality, quality, and user-friendliness. WillowTree's dream team has experts who are well-equipped and experienced in employing the latest technologies and methodologies of app development.

They focus on visual appeal along with functionality and operability. Having the unparalleled ability to develop custom solutions is what makes that ideal for businesses and exceptional in their field.  

Savvy Apps 

Based in Virginia, Savvy Apps is a customer-favorite and go-to custom app development company. It offers services and capabilities in Android and iOS app development. They also serve their clients through their comprehensive custom mobile app development services.

Savvy Apps offers an unparalleled and impeccable collaborative approach or strategy by working closely with clients to understand their points of view and vision. These are essential when it comes to developing an app that truly stands out.

Their attention to detail, commitment to serve, and dedication to their customers or clients earned them a spot among the best and hottest in the industry. 

Top Android App Development Companies in the UK 

Apadmi 

Apadmi is an impactful mobile app development company in the UK that offers capabilities and strengths in the realm of Android app development services. With a devoted focus on innovation and quality, Apadmi has scored numerous high-profile projects and clients from all over the globe and across industries.

Their ideal team of developers and designers work in coherence and collaboratively to create miracles in the form of custom mobile applications. Apadmi's ability and strength to seamlessly blend with the latest technologies and trends to offer unique solutions, earning them clients from leading giants and corporates. 

Waracle 

Waracle is a Scottish company that wins as the impactful android application development company, with remarkable mobile application development services. They specialize and lead in creating mobile applications and software that are hyper-personalized to each of their client’s needs.

Their strength in cross-platform mobile development surely earns them respect in the eyes of their clients and other businesses. They help businesses touch skies and reach a bigger chunk of the audience.  

Hedgehog lab 

Hedgehog Lab is a world-wide known mobile application development company with a strong hold and presence in the UK. They offer a plethora of mobile app development services alongside custom mobile app development services.

Hedgehog Lab's experienced, learned, and honed developers and designers create masterpiece and user-centric Android applications. They exactly know how to develop apps that can bring engagement and deliver results.  

Conclusion 

Partnering and joining hands with a reputable mobile app development company could, at times, work out in your favor. Sometimes, the best ideas and successful Android applications come from unexpected clients.

The companies listed above, both in the USA and the UK, are at the top of their fields with exceptional Android app development services. If you are in pursuit of a custom app or solution, you must contact them to draw life and ignite the spirit of success in your products.  

[mariacallous]

The first devices that will have to be sold according to strict EU directives will hit the European market after Apple on Tuesday presented its new iPhone with a USB-C charge point.

A European Union law requires phone manufacturers to adopt a common charging connection by December 2024 to save consumers’ money and cut waste. The iPhone 15 is the first Apple device to have a USB-C charger instead of Apple’s usual Lightning charger, after the EU ordered manufacturers to introduce identical connections.

Apple fiercely opposed the law in 2022, arguing that it would punish innovation, but the 27 EU member states make up the largest single market in the world, so they relented.

Common chargers are not the only requirements in the European Parliament’s push to make life easier for consumers and reduce waste, a Croatian member of the European Parliament, Biljana Borzan, who was one of the strongest advocates for the adoption of that act, told BIRN

“The single charger initiative is ten years old. The European Parliament then gave a mandate to the European Commission to implement it. A charger is an independent act, but in addition to mobile phones, other small devices such as tablets, game consoles, speakers, keyboards, headphones and laptops are also included,” Borzan said.

“My political group [Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament] has been the loudest about chargers. We cannot say that I was the initiator because it was initiated before I arrived in the European Parliament, but I certainly worked intensively on it,” Borzan said.

The common charger is not the only battle against Big Tech that the EU has won. Brussels believes it will win several more in the coming months.

The EU’s new technological target is artificial intelligence, AI, since the chatbot ChatGPT pointed to the rapid development of this technology last year. Brussels hopes to give a green light to a comprehensive AI law by the end of 2023.

“The directive on artificial intelligence is in the last negotiations. There are other directives that are relevant, for example, the Ecodesign Directive, but also my Directive that determines the availability of software to the consumer,” Borzan said.

The October 2022 landmark Digital Services Act, DSA, and the accompanying Digital Markets Act, DMA, are the biggest and latest attempts to rein in big tech companies.

The DSA requires companies to crack down on harmful and illegal content online and to assess the risks their platforms pose to society. Violation of the rules incur a penalty of 6 per cent of the offender’s annual global turnover.

Under the rules, 19  large internet platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter) and YouTube, had till August this year to comply with the DSA. All platforms will have to comply by February 2024.

These major platforms have already introduced changes, including the banning of targeted advertising to children.

“Different parts of the DSA apply to different market players. Last week, the Commission published a list of ‘gatekeepers’, large platforms that will bear special responsibility for the content on them. They are not overly enthusiastic about it, and Zalando even sued the EC before the European Court because they were involved,” Borzan told BIRN.

The changes are not limited to the EU. Snapchat said it would also limit personalized advertising to minors in the UK.

The DMA is another thorn in the side of technology firms, especially Apple. The law aims to dilute the dominance of the big players and make the market fairer.

The EU has an eye on six of them, in particular: Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook), Microsoft and ByteDance (TikTok). The DMA will force Apple to allow third parties to use its App Store.

General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR, came into effect in 2018 and was the strictest and best-known EU law in the field, ensuring that citizens have to give consent to the ways in which their data will be used.

In May, Ireland’s privacy regulator imposed its largest ever single fine of €1.2 billion on Meta for transferring personal data between Europe and the US.