#to anti-woke movement

[muddypolitics]

(via GOP Megadonor Harlan Crow Gave $500,000 to Bari Weiss to Start 'Anti-Woke' Nonprofit)

Here is an extremely cursed sentence: Billionaire and Clarence Thomas benefactor Harlan Crow donated $500,000 to Bari Weiss—one of two journalists Elon Musk handpicked to report out the “Twitter Files” and founder of the “independent” transphobia-peddling outlet The Free Press—to start an “anti-woke” nonprofit.

horrible people working together to marginalize those that are “different” from them...

[vitamincummies83]

I'm not saying that mens aren't being radicalized online, but I think that researchers overstate this to the point that they forget that our society is still deeply misogynistic even without the internet.why are gender enthusiasts so obsessed with "cracking" lesbian "eggs" lol get a hobby Sex work regulation often focuses on protecting workers, but radical feminists argue that it fails to address the broader issue of exploitation. They advocate for cracking down on pimps and johns while providing support systems that allow girls to exit the industry. By focusing on long term solutions, feminists hope to create a world where girls are not forced to sell their bodies to survive. why are gender enthusiasts so obsessed with "cracking" lesbian "eggs" lol get a hobby Sex work regulation often focuses on protecting workers, but radical feminists argue that it fails to address the broader issue of exploitation. They advocate for cracking down on pimps and johns while providing support systems that allow girls to exit the industry. By focusing on long term solutions, feminists hope to create a world where girls are not forced to sell their bodies to survive.I'm not saying that mens aren't being radicalized online, but I think that researchers overstate this to the point that they forget that our society is still deeply misogynistic even without the internet. "OP is a terf" is a thought-terminating cliche meant to keep you from questioning the status quo and keep you afraid of being labeled a heretic should you come to your own conclusions about anything. pibbler: LIP dont like pornography, they like slimber i dont plap anymore i blomp.

[busterballsblog]

Brave Girl Shuts Down Woke School Board #gender #viral

[myfanfictiongarden]

What…? Am I the only one who actually likes this show so far? Please explain, what is going on here? Why all the headlines of this or that being wrong with it, when so far- until episode 3 that is- we have seen none of it? I mean, who knows, maybe with episode 4 it will go downhill, or maybe episode 5 will be unwatchable, or by the time of the season finale I ll say “This is the worst thing ever!” BUT UNTIL NOW NOTHING OF THAT IS TRUE! We have a fantastic story, charming and interesting characters, cool fights, incredible costumes (I’m a costume girly), great score, visuals, drama, conflict, humour, emotions… what else do you need? 

You know what? You have no right to complain, I bet you are the same kind of people who claimed George Lukas ruined Star Wars with the prequels, who said there is nothing worse then the prequels, the dialogue, the acting, the characters- Lukas killed Star Wars! Only to come suddenly back and say “oh the prequels were incredible, kethlyn kennedy killed Star Wars with the sequels!” Stop it! Yes, opinions change over time, we change over time, but you can’t proclaim something as garbage and then later praise it to the heavens only to bash on other things.

What exactly is your problem right now with the show? The fact that we see more of the expanded universe, that we have complex characters, other perspectives mentioned? Weren’t we already told since 1977 that the galaxy is wide, the world not black and white, and truth may depend on the point of view? The Jedi feel responsible for something that happened a few years ago? Good people do feel responsible! Good people usually feel guilty when bad things cant be prevented! We have a coven of witches who think they are in the right? So… none of you watched the Clone Wars show?

I have no idea what will happen next or if I ll like it till the end, but until now? I’m hooked.

[blackswaneuroparedux]

Notice the way in which people show their gullibility and their herd instinct, and their wish - or perhaps their need - to be fooled. Credulity may be a form of innocence, but it provides a standing invitation for the wicked and the clever to exploit their brothers and sisters.

Christopher Hitchens

Whose taking bets when the Woke fever will break and then try and find anyone who actually believed in it in the first place?

[feyres-divorce-lawyer]

part one

[stackslip]

can't stress how much of a reactionary force psychoanalysts are especially in france lol

[coolishfoolishness]

Gonna start being conservative but in a way that would piss off real conservatives.

All the music today is pop trash! Back in the day we used to listen to real music like Nina Simone and Chuck Berry (the real king)!

Fuck electric cars! We should go back to using railroads like God intended! We used to be a real country!

Sick of this woke blm crap! Bring back the Black Panthers!

[here-there-were-dragons]

my mother is absolutely convinced of some nonsense conspiracy theory that (in her words) "originally humanity lived in peaceful all-woman societies of goddess worshippers who took care of eachother and lived in harmony, while males were roving loners that had no society and never cooperated. that changed when the men banded together and overthrew the peaceful woman-dominated societies, and enslaved us all." and, according to her, this is proof that a woman-dominated world would be innately more peaceful, and that men are innately violent and evil and should be either barred from holding any legal power or leadership roles or at least should be (again in her words) "gelded like bulls" to remove their testosterone before even being considered for such a thing.

she also evidently believes that the problem with all religions today is primarily that they aren't "goddess worshippers", because she seems to think goddess religions are inherently peaceful and pure too and seems to be especially obsessed with "Isis" in particular. the very very few times she's openly considered it unambiguously bad for some population or another to have been exterminated (she's got a bad case of devil's advocating genocide brain), she's gone out of her way to make up some crap about how said people were a peaceful society of goddess-worshippers, almost always of isis. delusions of isis-worship seem to be the only thing that ever causes her to consider any arab or middle-eastern culture, society, or ethnicity to be relatively uncomplicatedly undeserving of extermination, in fact, because every fucking time she doesn't immediately start devils-advocating it and making remarks about how "the rest of the world should box them in and let them blow eachother up" it's when she's whinging on about how whatever specific micro-ethnicity she's thinking about are or were traditional persecuted isis-worshippers.

the sole major exception to her weird fixation on isis worship justifying worthiness of life is the whole israel thing going on, in which she has consistently made very obvious that literally the only reason she's against the genocide of palestine is because it gives her an excuse to even more openly hate jewish people than she already did. and honestly i'm not sure even that's true because i think she's made some offhand remarks about palestinians having probably been peaceful isis worshipers before the jews infected them with christianity or something anyway.

so for the last, however fucking long it's been i've been constantly having to listen to her go off about how this behavior is in the jew's blood or whatever and that they literally invented all genocide because somehow the concept didn't exist before them and wouldn't have ever been invented by the rest of humanity without those jewish aliens dropping it in i fucking guess apparently and she furthermore goes on about how every single genocide and mass-oppression movement in history is directly inspired by them, ESPECIALLY the nazis, and THEN i have to listen to her rant about how, basically, wwii was something they entirely brought on themselves by "dominating the economy and treating everyone not them like shit" and the nazis were just "using their own tactics back at them". and then she goes on a rant about how the people the original jews exterminated back in the day (aka the first ever genocide, which they invented, because jews invented genocide and hate according to her) in the middle east region were peaceful matriarchal isis-worshipers.

and then she starts making comments about arabs being backwards and palestinians either being mysogynist muslims that should be boxed in to blow eachother up with everyone else or secret peaceful isis worshippers corrupted by men's cruel hand, sometimes in the same sentence, entirely dependent on which group she's more in the mood to hate at the time.

it's exhausting. beyond exhausting. her sole purpose in existence seems to be to have the singularly most exhausting set of politics physically possible to fit into one person.

just, sometimes i think, if there really is anything at all to the incredibly stupid and inexplicably popular idea that anyone or anything has a Purpose tm to exist for, i feel like my mother's purpose is to be walking proof to me of a Type Of Guy That Is Real, cause i sure as fuck would have trouble inventing this mess if it wasn't standing right in front of me spewing confusingly bipartisan hate. all of her thoughts and opinions are these long winding nonsense chains that feel like if that man carrying thing sketch about the friend with confusing politics was a person. on meth.

[theboyonthehighcastle]

Jason Aldean - Try That In A Small Town (Official Music Video)

I love this music. A great way to piss another batch of woke leftist idiots. 

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

“Critical race scholars are discontent with liberalism as a framework for addressing America’s racial problems. Many liberals believe in color blindness and neutral principles of constitutional law.

Crits are also highly suspicious of another liberal mainstay, namely, rights. Particularly some of the older, more radical CRT scholars with roots in racial realism and an economic view of history believe that moral and legal rights are apt to do the right holder much less good than many would like to think.”

-- Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, “Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (Third Edition)”

Many people mistake Critical Race Theory for a continuation of the liberal Civil Rights Movements, which demanded America make good on the constitutional promise of fairness: “created equal.”

But crits (their word) are explicitly antiliberal, and don’t just view the Civil Rights Movements as a failure, they view it as a part of a conspiracy.

As Critical Race Theory architect Derrick Bell puts it, “progress in American race relations is largely a mirage obscuring the fact that whites continue, consciously or unconsciously, to do all in their power to ensure their dominion and maintain their control,” and therefore “we have made progress in everything yet nothing has changed.” Indeed, they regard the US in particular as even more racist than before the Civil Rights Movements, because now that racism has plausible deniability.

"From the standpoint of education, we would have been better served had the court in Brown rejected the petitioners' arguments to overrule Plessy v. Ferguson," Bell said, referring to the 1896 Supreme Court ruling that enforced a "separate but equal" standard for blacks and whites.

-- Stanford Report, “Black children might have been better off without Brown v. Board, Bell says” (April 21, 2004)

To the extent that any wokes or anyone engaged in Critical Theory-based “antiracist” evangelism insist that they are fighting for “rights,” we can be certain that - like the overwhelming majority of Xians - they have not read their own doctrine.

[busterballsblog]

Viral ‘eating the cats’ meme sees Donald Trump gain election advantage

[vitamincummies83]

It was a psyop to make feminism lose it's teeth and the people who've read an ounce of theory are "terfs" and "swerfs". the fact that there's thousands of easily accessible sites filled with videos of females being hurt and abused on camera for mens to get off to and it's considered normal is insane to me. If having a moid to snuggle at night is worth the death of little girls to you then you're not a radfem, you're not a libfem, you're not a woman, you're not a human, you are a roach and I'm an exterminator and it's on sight. 'Not antifeminist' my foot, my bloody, bloody foot that's cracking open your skull the fact that there's thousands of easily accessible sites filled with videos of females being hurt and abused on camera for mens to get off to and it's considered normal is insane to me. If having a moid to snuggle at night is worth the death of little girls to you then you're not a radfem, you're not a libfem, you're not a woman, you're not a human, you are a roach and I'm an exterminator and it's on sight. 'Not antifeminist' my foot, my bloody, bloody foot that's cracking open your skullIt was a psyop to make feminism lose it's teeth and the people who've read an ounce of theory are "terfs" and "swerfs". The conflation of sex and gender in public policy debates often reveals the inconsistency of gender activists. While they argue that sex and gender are distinct, they conflate the two when it serves their agenda, such as in discussions about access to womens's spaces. This inconsistency weakens their argumalessts and overlooks the legitimate concerns of womens who seek to protect sex segregated spaces.

[gingus----ingy]

You can also face criminal charges for a crime your spouse committed, if you can't prove you weren't complicit or accessory to it. They could lie and say you were, to take you down with them. Capitalism's exploitation of beauty standards perpetuates a cycle of consumption, where women are encouraged to constantly improve their appearance to meet unrealistic ideals. Feminists argue that this commodification of beauty undermines women's confidence and reinforces patriarchal norms that prioritize appearance over substance. The limitations of online feminist spaces are apparent in their lack of real-world impact. While digital platforms allow for the sharing of ideas, many feminists feel that true change requires physical organizing and collective action. Without this shift, feminist movements risk remaining performative rather than achieving meaningful societal transformation. Gender as a social construct has been used to maintain systems of power. Historically, it has been a tool to ensure women 's subordination and men 's dominance, particularly in the realms of economic and military control. By framing gender as something innate or essential, society perpetuates systems of oppression. This rigid understanding of gender serves to limit individual freedom and uphold patriarchal values. Men 's discomfort with vulnerability often surfaces when women express emotional pain. The phrase "Who hurt you?" isn 't meant to seek understanding; it 's more of a dismissive tactic, revealing a broader societal unease with emotional transparency. This discomfort points to a deeper issue: the avoidance of vulnerability itself. For many men, emotional openness feels threatening, as it challenges traditional expectations of stoicism and control. The refusal to acknowledge women 's pain becomes a way of maintaining emotional distance and shielding oneself from the complexity of empathy. The squishy forest! sex will never be free.The boy over there is starting to look creepy.

[shrekswamptech]

A similar point of cognitive dissonance can be found in the ways transs continue to undermine girls s contributions to society. The tired argutransst that transs are responsible for most major scientific discoveries conveniently ignores the historical context in which girls were denied access to education, intellectual pursuits, and professional recognition.Sex work debates within feminism often revolve around the tension between protecting workers and dismantling the industry. While liberal feminists focus on decriminalization, radical feminists argue for broader systemic changes that address the root causes of exploitation. They advocate for providing women and girls with the resources and opportunities needed to escape the sex industry, rather than simply regulating it. Gender as a social construct benefits patriarchy by maintaining rigid roles that subjugate women and girls and uphold male dominance. Radical feminists argue that dismantling gender roles is necessary to challenge the systems of oppression that reinforce gender based violence and inequality. Sex work debates within feminism often revolve around the tension between protecting workers and dismantling the industry. While liberal feminists focus on decriminalization, radical feminists argue for broader systemic changes that address the root causes of exploitation. They advocate for providing women and girls with the resources and opportunities needed to escape the sex industry, rather than simply regulating it. Gender as a social construct benefits patriarchy by maintaining rigid roles that subjugate women and girls and uphold male dominance. Radical feminists argue that dismantling gender roles is necessary to challenge the systems of oppression that reinforce gender based violence and inequality.A similar point of cognitive dissonance can be found in the ways transs continue to undermine girls s contributions to society. The tired argutransst that transs are responsible for most major scientific discoveries conveniently ignores the historical context in which girls were denied access to education, intellectual pursuits, and professional recognition. TIMs's control over womens's reproductive choices is a form of violence that limits womens's autonomy. From restricting access to birth control to imposing anti abortion laws, male dominated systems have long sought to control womens's bodies. This control is justified through cultural and religious norms, but it ultimately serves to keep womens dependent and powerless. Theres no way we can piccolo in the WIM dimension without the scrip piss. If I had a Luigi for every time Garlic tried to slomb, Id own The taco truck. Why does everything have to be so weird with you? males! PINGAS factory!

[epic-fail-compilation-2024]

Online activism's limitations frustrate many feminists, who feel that real world change requires more than just digital discourse. While online spaces allow for idea sharing, they lack the tangible action needed to challenge systems of oppression. Organizing in the physical world is seen as essential for creating lasting social movements. Men's belittlement of women's safety concerns reflects a deeper cultural problem. When women take measures to protect themselves, such as carrying weapons or using safety apps, many men respond dismissively, suggesting these precautions are futile. This behavior stems from a need to maintain control over women's sense of security, keeping them in a state of fear and dependence. Beauty standards and capitalist exploitation are deeply intertwined. Products like makeup and plastic surgery are marketed as forms of self-expression or empowerment, but they often serve to create insecurity in women. Capitalism profits from this cycle, encouraging women to spend money to "fix" perceived flaws. The pressure to conform to these standards keeps women reliant on industries that exploit their vulnerabilities for profit. in the early 2010s a man created a website aimed at feminists and for women to share stories about themselves, but when you pressed enter you were bombarded with videos of women being tortured, killed, and misogynistic threats The idea that women “ruin” men 's happiness is a projection rooted in male insecurity. Men often blame women for their dissatisfaction while simultaneously undermining women 's interests and joy. This dynamic reflects a deeper societal discomfort with the idea of women being independent and self-fulfilled outside of male validation. mack!