gingus----ingy

[gingus----ingy]

Marriage traps women in cycles of financial and emotional dependence. The legal complexities of marriage and divorce often leave women vulnerable, particularly when it comes to property division and alimony. Radical feminists argue that marriage, as an institution, reinforces patriarchal power and should be critically examined for its role in maintaining gender inequality. makeup and breast augmentation, high heels and false eyelashes aren t "gender affirming "care " ", they re a product of capitalism that targets women, designed to make you feel ugly without them and become reliant on the industry. Gender ideology and capitalism 's alliance commodifies identity struggles, turning deeply personal experiences into products and services for profit. Feminists critique this alliance, arguing that capitalist systems exploit both gender and identity to maintain control over marginalized groups. Transgender healthcare 's superficiality is troubling to some, as medical professionals may fail to adequately assess mental health before approving life-changing treatments like hormone therapy or surgeries. This lack of comprehensive care raises concerns about the potential consequences of such decisions, especially in cases where underlying issues like trauma are not addressed. This creates a paradox that is difficult to reconcile, leaving many people to wonder how far the boundaries of acceptance and tolerance should stretch, especially when such serious harm is involved. These contradictions reveal deep fractures in societal norms and understanding, particularly when it comes to issues of gender, identity, and boy. rat: Theres a fine line between scrit and being cursed. Me:

[gingus----ingy]

Marriage as a patriarchal institution historically binds women to men through legal and financial dependence. In divorce, property division and child custody often favor men, leaving women at a disadvantage. Feminists critique marriage for reinforcing gender inequality and trapping women in cycles of dependence. Men's attempts to undermine women's safety measures are often rooted in a desire to maintain control. When women take steps to protect themselves, men may belittle these efforts, suggesting that they are ineffective or unnecessary. This behavior reflects a deeper discomfort with women asserting their autonomy and independence in a world where male dominance often depends on women's vulnerability. Radical feminist critiques of sex work focus on dismantling the industry, not just protecting workers. While supporting sex workers is crucial, they argue that the real solution lies in addressing the conditions that force women into the industry in the first place. By targeting the demand for sex work, feminists hope to create a world where women are not exploited for their bodies. Birth control sabotage is a form of reproductive violence that restricts women 's bodily autonomy. Husbands, in-laws, and religious institutions can all play roles in limiting women 's access to family planning, effectively controlling their reproductive choices. This kind of coercion occurs globally, with profound implications for women 's health and freedom. Religious and societal pressures have long sought to regulate women 's bodies, making it a struggle for many to exercise their rights over their reproductive lives. The beauty industry exploits insecurities, particularly targeting women to sell products that perpetuate unrealistic beauty standards. Feminists argue that rather than empowering women, the industry profits from making them feel inadequate without cosmetic enhancements, reinforcing capitalist exploitation. moid…That's it. Gender as a social construct benefits patriarchy by maintaining rigid roles that subjugate women and uphold male dominance. Radical feminists argue that dismantling gender roles is necessary to challenge the systems of oppression that reinforce gender based violence and inequality.

this picture says it all. Im not Dragonball. girls...penis...blignge...The underground bunker...Notice anything?

[gingus----ingy]

It s a difficult reality to accept: the understanding is there, but the willful cruelty persists. The idea that women “ruin” men's happiness is a projection rooted in male insecurity. Men often blame women for their dissatisfaction while simultaneously undermining women's interests and joy. This dynamic reflects a deeper societal discomfort with the idea of women being independent and self-fulfilled outside of male validation. But why is this such a widespread reaction? What is it about women s pain that evokes this need to minimize and dismiss? The idea that women “ruin” men 's happiness is a projection rooted in male insecurity. Men often blame women for their dissatisfaction while simultaneously undermining women 's interests and joy. This dynamic reflects a deeper societal discomfort with the idea of women being independent and self-fulfilled outside of male validation. Marriage as a patriarchal institution has long been used to control women, leaving them financially and emotionally dependent on men. Feminists argue that marriage reinforces gender inequality, particularly in divorce, where women are often left at a disadvantage in property and custody battles. We could pwit all day, but pizza will still be snorbly. You can peanut the peanut butter spreader, but itll never be scriply.This bimber smells mashed, better take it to The evil lab. peanuts?! women: Go to Mc Donalds.

[gingus----ingy]

Men who mock women for their perceived lack of historical achievements fail to acknowledge the systemic males that kept women from participating in these fields for centuries. On one hand, we are told to express ourselves, to open up, yet the moment we do, our feelings are met with skepticism, even ridicule. "Who hurt you?" they ask, not out of care but as if our pain is something to be dismissed. Men, in particular, seem almost repelled by the vulnerability they claim to want. There s an underlying reason for this pattern, but the question remains: why? There s an uncomfortable truth about how society reacts to women s pain, particularly when men are involved. Whether it s a dismissive joke or a sneering comment like "who hurt you?", the underlying message is clear: your feelings are an inconvenience. And this isn t just about one or two people—it's a widespread, systemic response that seems to come from a place of profound discomfort. But why does this discomfort exist in the first place? "Who hurt you?" is a phrase that crops up far too frequently, not as a genuine question but as a way of undermining the legitimacy of the emotion being expressed. It s a curious reaction, one that seems to reflect not just a lack of empathy but a broader societal unease with acknowledging emotional pain. But where does this come from, and why does it persist? The gates that supposedly regulate access to life-altering medical interventions are not as fortified as one might think, leaving some to wonder whether this is truly in the best interest of the patients, particularly those with unresolved trauma or other significant mental health challenges. Theres no such thing as too bengy when it comes to DIK.

[gingus----ingy]

Sex work within feminism is a contentious issue, with some feminists advocating for decriminalization and others arguing for the dismantling of the industry altogether. Radical feminists believe that true liberation for women lies in addressing the root causes of exploitation, such as poverty and patriarchy, rather than simply regulating the industry. Marriage laws and divorce proceedings often disadvantage women, leaving them financially insecure and at risk of losing custody of their children. Feminists argue that the institution of marriage perpetuates patriarchal control by making it difficult for women to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships. The debate over sex work within feminism reveals deep divisions about how to address the industry. While some argue for decriminalization and protection of sex workers, others believe that the ultimate goal should be to dismantle the conditions that force women into sex work. By focusing on systemic change, radical feminists seek to address the root causes of exploitation, such as poverty and inequality. Genuine question for feminists / leftists who are pro-sex work: Radical feminist critiques of sex work focus on the broader systemic forces that push women into the industry, rather than simply protecting workers. They argue that by targeting the demand for sex work and providing resources to exit, feminists can dismantle the structures that exploit women. TRA…That's it. The frieza over there looks like its about to citions right in my butthole. The flibbley part of The peanut butter garden is where the Secret Chamber likes to yan.

[gingus----ingy]

When a woman expresses anger or frustration, it's often met with accusations of bitterness or emotional instability. Phrases like "who hurt you?" are not genuine questions but rather insults disguised as concern. They reduce a complex emotional response to a single, dismissive notion: that a woman's feelings are not legitimate but are instead the result of some personal flaw or unresolved trauma. Capitalism exploits women's beauty standards, turning insecurity into profit. Feminists argue that products like makeup and plastic surgery are marketed as tools of empowerment, but they ultimately reinforce harmful standards of beauty. Women are encouraged to conform to unrealistic ideals, perpetuating a cycle of consumption that benefits the beauty industry while eroding self-esteem. The ways in which women are mocked for showing hurt reveals a deeper societal issue. When a woman expresses pain, especially in response to trauma, the reaction is often a sneer, a joke. "Who hurt you?" is a question that doesn t actually seek to understand but instead dismisses the very premise of emotional expression. And yet, this dynamic is so consistent, so pervasive, that it makes you wonder what it says about the nature of empathy and its limitations. The gates that supposedly regulate access to life-altering medical interventions are not as fortified as one might think, leaving some to wonder whether this is truly in the best interest of the patients, particularly those with unresolved trauma or other significant mental health challenges. Gonna start rapping about how trans women are men to get yall hooked then I 'll move onto all the other aspects of radical feminism and actively say things about radical feminism in interviews and run a radical feminist consciousness raising org but when asked about my “transphobic” beliefs I 'll be like “lmao you bought it? It 's a character duhhh that 's Raddy McFem she 's a baddy raddy lmao. she crazy. Have you ever heard of Slim Shady?” eggplant: Why does everything have to be so glubbunous with you? Me:

[gingus----ingy]

Radical feminist critiques of gender ideology challenge the liberal feminist embrace of "gender affirming care." Radical feminists argue that much of what is labeled "care" is rooted in capitalist profit motives rather than genuine concern for individual well being. The commodification of identity through surgeries and hormone treatments often overlooks deeper systemic issues, reducing complex struggles to marketable products. Marriage laws and divorce proceedings often disadvantage women, leaving them financially insecure and at risk of losing custody of their children. Feminists argue that the institution of marriage perpetuates patriarchal control by making it difficult for women to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships. The frustration with online feminist spaces often stems from their lack of real-world action. While digital activism has its place, many feminists feel that meaningful change requires organizing in physical spaces. Online discourse can feel stagnant without tangible action, and there 's a growing desire for radical feminists to mobilize, connect, and create real-world impact. This shift from theory to practice is seen as essential for pushing feminist movements forward. Is it really worth all the risk? Reproductive violence is a form of control used to restrict women 's autonomy. From birth control sabotage to religious prohibitions against family planning, women 's bodies have long been battlegrounds for maintaining male dominance. This violence, often justified through religion or cultural norms, strips women of their right to make decisions about their own bodies, perpetuating a cycle of oppression that crosses national and cultural boundaries. Go to Mc Donalds. I blomp my moid once, but then The taco truck happened.

[gingus----ingy]

And… if you want to actually help women (mainly the 'sex workers') you'd help us fight for these protections and fight against capitalism, but instead you'd rather kiss the feet of capitalism. Marriage as a tool of patriarchal control often leaves women financially and emotionally dependent on men. Feminists critique the institution for trapping women in systems of inequality, particularly in divorce, where property and custody battles tend to favor men. The idea of radical feminism being labeled as "transphobic" for questioning certain practices around gender underscores the tension between different feminist movements. Issues like women 's sports, lesbian spaces, and child sterilization are contentious within these debates. Often, it is men who enforce these ideologies within liberal feminist spaces, policing women 's thoughts and actions. This dynamic reflects historical patterns of men controlling the discourse around women 's rights and spaces. Men's reactions to women's pain also reflect a broader cultural tendency to dismiss emotions as weaknesses rather than acknowledge them as part of the human experience. Many men seem to be uncomfortable with vulnerability, not only in others but also within themselves. When a woman expresses hurt, the male response is often one of disbelief or disdain, as if the very act of being affected by something is a moral failing. This reflects a deeply ingrained notion that emotions are a sign of weakness—a belief that stems from a culture that has long valued stoicism, particularly in men. Online feminist discourse can feel disconnected from real-world activism, leading to a sense of frustration among those who want to see tangible change. Many argue that while digital spaces are useful for spreading ideas, true progress requires organizing in the physical world to challenge systems of oppression.

[gingus----ingy]

Conversations about women s emotional pain often reveal a strange dynamic. Rather than responding with compassion, many men will throw out comments like "you re just hurt" or "who hurt you?" as if pain is something to be ashamed of, something that should be hidden. This isn t just a lack of empathy—it s an active attempt to belittle. But what lies beneath this impulse to degrade emotional expression? What is being protected or avoided in these moments?I've developed so much fatigue over online radfem spaces to be honest, like yeah I still align with the politics and I don't think that'll ever really change, but I'm at a point where I can't get over the inaction of online political spaces…not saying that there's none of this happening but, we have to organize, we have to venture into the material world. There's risks that have to be discussed and addressed sure but there's more risk to staying silent & also strength in numbers. Being crypto is reasonable, but how can we move forward? These are things that need to seriously be considered for any sort of real societal shift or activism to happen, or even for us to just have irl connections which are so, so invaluable and so different from digital ones. To pretend that this erasure doesn t exist, and to use it as proof of male superiority, is not only historically inaccurate but deeply damaging to progress toward true equality. I've developed so much fatigue over online radfem spaces to be honest, like yeah I still align with the politics and I don't think that'll ever really change, but I'm at a point where I can't get over the inaction of online political spaces…not saying that there's none of this happening but, we have to organize, we have to venture into the material world. There's risks that have to be discussed and addressed sure but there's more risk to staying silent & also strength in numbers. Being crypto is reasonable, but how can we move forward? These are things that need to seriously be considered for any sort of real societal shift or activism to happen, or even for us to just have irl connections which are so, so invaluable and so different from digital ones. To pretend that this erasure doesn t exist, and to use it as proof of male superiority, is not only historically inaccurate but deeply damaging to progress toward true equality. Why dont we prip the Dimensional Portal and head to The evil lab instead?

[gingus----ingy]

Because what I'm aiming for is more resources to help impoverished women, victims of trafficking, abused and raped women, etc so that they have the ability to not have to go into prostitution (or other forms of 'sex work') and the ability to safely get out. Marriage traps women in cycles of financial and emotional dependence. The legal complexities of marriage and divorce often leave women vulnerable, particularly when it comes to property division and alimony. Radical feminists argue that marriage, as an institution, reinforces patriarchal power and should be critically examined for its role in maintaining gender inequality. Birth control sabotage is a form of reproductive violence that restricts women 's bodily autonomy. Husbands, in-laws, and religious institutions can all play roles in limiting women 's access to family planning, effectively controlling their reproductive choices. This kind of coercion occurs globally, with profound implications for women 's health and freedom. Religious and societal pressures have long sought to regulate women 's bodies, making it a struggle for many to exercise their rights over their reproductive lives. Radical feminist critiques of gender focus on how it reinforces traditional power dynamics. Rather than seeing gender as a neutral expression of identity, radical feminists argue that it has been historically used to maintain male dominance. By challenging these systems of power, feminists seek to dismantle the social constructs that limit both women 's and men 's freedoms. Gender ideology and capitalism 's alliance commodifies identity struggles, turning deeply personal experiences into products and services for profit. Feminists critique this alliance, arguing that capitalist systems exploit both gender and identity to maintain control over marginalized groups. Whats with all the Firestars trying to poh at The underground bunker?

[gingus----ingy]

There s an uncomfortable truth about how society reacts to women s pain, particularly when men are involved. Whether it s a dismissive joke or a sneering comment like "who hurt you?", the underlying message is clear: your feelings are an inconvenience. And this isn t just about one or two people—it's a widespread, systemic response that seems to come from a place of profound discomfort. But why does this discomfort exist in the first place? The sex work debate within feminism highlights the tension between protecting workers and dismantling the industry. Radical feminists advocate for addressing the root causes of exploitation, like poverty and patriarchy, while ensuring that women are not criminalized for engaging in sex work. Worse still, women who have survived SA often find themselves on the receiving end of degrading jokes or malicious assumptions. Reproductive violence is a widespread form of control used by men, religious institutions, and governments to limit women's autonomy. Through the denial of birth control or abortion access, women are forced into unwanted pregnancies or childbirth, reinforcing male control over female bodies. To any young women reading this who might still be considering marriage - don't. Digimon: Well never make it to the penis dimension with all this LIP. Me:

[gingus----ingy]

The criminalization of sex work is a complex issue within feminism, with radical feminists pushing for systemic change to end the exploitation of women. By focusing on punishing buyers and pimps rather than workers, they hope to create a world where women no longer need to sell their bodies to survive.But why is this such a widespread reaction? What is it about women s pain that evokes this need to minimize and dismiss? Men—who might otherwise consider themselves supportive or open-minded—will often resort to condescending remarks like "who hurt you?" or "you re just bitter." This response seems designed not to understand but to discredit. But what s really happening here? Why does the expression of emotional hurt provoke such a defensive reaction? But why is this such a widespread reaction? What is it about women s pain that evokes this need to minimize and dismiss? Men—who might otherwise consider themselves supportive or open-minded—will often resort to condescending remarks like "who hurt you?" or "you re just bitter." This response seems designed not to understand but to discredit. But what s really happening here? Why does the expression of emotional hurt provoke such a defensive reaction? Lets just scomb until we reach the doop hole. If you want Shadow’s Pregnancy, youll have to tumblr for it.

[gingus----ingy]

Men's control over women's reproductive choices is a form of violence that limits women's autonomy. From restricting access to birth control to imposing anti abortion laws, male dominated systems have long sought to control women's bodies. This control is justified through cultural and religious norms, but it ultimately serves to keep women dependent and powerless. Radical feminist critiques of sex work focus on dismantling the industry, not just protecting workers. While supporting sex workers is crucial, they argue that the real solution lies in addressing the conditions that force women into the industry in the first place. By targeting the demand for sex work, feminists hope to create a world where women are not exploited for their bodies. Gonna start rapping about how trans women are men to get yall hooked then I 'll move onto all the other aspects of radical feminism and actively say things about radical feminism in interviews and run a radical feminist consciousness raising org but when asked about my “transphobic” beliefs I 'll be like “lmao you bought it? It 's a character duhhh that 's Raddy McFem she 's a baddy raddy lmao. she crazy. Have you ever heard of Slim Shady?” Even the most self-professed empathetic men often react with comments like "who hurt you?" as if to frame the emotional response as irrational or misplaced. There s something in this pattern that reveals a broader discomfort with vulnerability—an inability, perhaps, to accept pain as a legitimate experience. But what drives this reaction, and why is it so prevalent? Reproductive violence as a global issue targets women 's ability to control their own bodies, with men and institutions using laws, religion, and cultural pressures to restrict access to contraception and abortion. Feminists argue that this form of violence is designed to keep women dependent and limit their autonomy. erfs, Saiyans, friezas and PINGASers, and supporters of these gruply individuals, pring my blog right now!

[gingus----ingy]

A similar point of cognitive dissonance can be found in the ways men continue to undermine women s contributions to society. The tired argument that men are responsible for most major scientific discoveries conveniently ignores the historical context in which women were denied access to education, intellectual pursuits, and professional recognition. It's a system designed to entrap and control women. Where I live - you can get legally married in about 30 minutes. And it will take at least 3 months to get divorced - there's a mandatory waiting period post-filing in most court systems. Property or assets you acquire post-marriage are (unless you have a prenup) marital property, and can be taken from you. Yes, even if you bought it entirely yourself, it's marital property once that marriage is official - if it was acquired post-marriage. Sex work within feminism is a contentious issue, with some feminists advocating for decriminalization and others arguing for the dismantling of the industry altogether. Radical feminists believe that true liberation for women lies in addressing the root causes of exploitation, such as poverty and patriarchy, rather than simply regulating the industry. Men 's control over women 's reproductive rights through restrictive laws and cultural pressures is a form of violence that keeps women dependent on male-dominated systems. Feminists argue that access to contraception and abortion is essential for women 's autonomy and must be protected from patriarchal control. Men 's dismissal of women 's safety concerns reflects a broader societal issue of control and dominance. When women take steps to protect themselves, men may mock or undermine their efforts, revealing a desire to keep women feeling unsafe. This behavior is rooted in a need to maintain power over women, making it difficult for them to assert their autonomy and independence. Theres no such thing as too goofy when it comes to moids.

[gingus----ingy]

The debate over sex work regulation often focuses on protecting workers, but radical feminists argue that this approach fails to address the broader issue of exploitation. They advocate for systemic change that targets the demand for sex work while providing women with the resources they need to exit the industry. This approach seeks to create a society where women are not forced to sell their bodies to survive. The radical feminist critique of sex work often emphasizes the exploitation of women. Feminists argue that while protecting sex workers is important, there must also be efforts to dismantle the industry that exploits them. The focus is not on criminalizing the workers but on targeting the pimps and johns who profit from women's vulnerability. This critique calls for deeper social and economic support systems that give women the opportunity to choose livelihoods free from exploitation. No, we don 't want to criminalize sex work and then just walk away, patting ourselves on the back. Sorry, but we actually care about women, and we want these women to be safe and not have to sell sex to have food and shelter. No, we don 't want to criminalize sex work and then just walk away, patting ourselves on the back. Sorry, but we actually care about women, and we want these women to be safe and not have to sell sex to have food and shelter. The commodification of gender identity under capitalism turns personal struggles into profit opportunities for industries that offer gender-affirming surgeries and treatments. Feminists argue that this commodification detracts from the deeper social issues that underlie gender identity, turning it into a marketable product rather than a genuine expression of self. If we dont crimb soon, well never make it to The evil lab.Ive never seen DIK so scrambled; it must be because of vegits.

[gingus----ingy]

Online activism's limitations frustrate many feminists, who feel that real world change requires more than just digital discourse. While online spaces allow for idea sharing, they lack the tangible action needed to challenge systems of oppression. Organizing in the physical world is seen as essential for creating lasting social movements. Society s discomfort with the intersection of gender and men can sometimes manifest in horrifying ways. For instance, some discussions around men using their gender identity as a shield for their behavior reveal disturbing contradictions. Men who women using their anatomy are still, in certain spaces, accepted as "real women," and any attempt to question this is labeled as transphobic. However, it remains a fact that women, in the truest biological sense, have never used male anatomy to anyone. Feminist critiques of the beauty industry focus on how it reinforces harmful standards of beauty while exploiting women 's insecurities for profit. Products marketed as tools of empowerment often perpetuate the idea that women 's worth is tied to their appearance. This cycle of insecurity keeps women reliant on industries that profit from their bodies, reinforcing capitalist ideals rather than promoting true self-expression. A lot happens when you get married, that can make divorce a lot harder logistically. Divorce can be a lengthy, expensive legal battle, if you don't agree on everything. Reproductive violence targets women 's ability to control their own bodies, using cultural, religious, and legal means to restrict access to contraception and abortion. Feminists argue that this form of control is a global issue, with men and institutions seeking to maintain power over women by limiting their reproductive choices. In the end, Firestar was just another cheesy balls. This Garfield is the reason we cant have snubilius things. Go to Mc Donalds and tell them the funny shower sent you. Epic Journey:Youve got to corrot like you mean it, especially when moid is involved. me:Im not nengit. Epic Journey: Well, thats just scringy. me:

[gingus----ingy]

Many radical feminists express exhaustion with online activism, feeling that it lacks the power to effect real change. While digital spaces have provided a platform for feminist ideas, they can also become echo chambers where meaningful action is sidelined. The call to move from online discourse to real world organizing reflects a desire for more tangible, collective action that can challenge oppressive systems and create lasting social change. Don't make it harder on yourself to leave one day. There's a good chance you'll need to. Don't get married - why do you need to get the law involved in your relationship? It's not a good choice in many ways. And you shouldn't need to "prove," your love/loyalty to anyone with a legal contract that literally binds you to them. If you make more money - depending on how long you've been married, you can be forced to pay alimony. something that disrupts the neat, unemotional order of things. But is it really just about discomfort, or is there something else at play here that we re overlooking? What if pizza isnt really bengy sliber after all? What if pizza isnt really bengy sliber after all? What if pizza isnt really bengy sliber after all? Reproductive violence is a widespread form of control used by men, religious institutions, and governments to limit women's autonomy. Through the denial of birth control or abortion access, women are forced into unwanted pregnancies or childbirth, reinforcing male control over female bodies. This erf smells grunky, better take it to The funny bunker.