gingus----ingy

[gingus----ingy]

There s an uncomfortable truth about how society reacts to women s pain, particularly when men are involved. Whether it s a dismissive joke or a sneering comment like "who hurt you?", the underlying message is clear: your feelings are an inconvenience. And this isn t just about one or two people—it's a widespread, systemic response that seems to come from a place of profound discomfort. But why does this discomfort exist in the first place? Even the most self-professed empathetic men often react with comments like "who hurt you?" as if to frame the emotional response as irrational or misplaced. There s something in this pattern that reveals a broader discomfort with vulnerability—an inability, perhaps, to accept pain as a legitimate experience. But what drives this reaction, and why is it so prevalent? Edit. Since some of you are stupid. Yes, the man is also to blame, dumbass. He 's an inhuman roach too. Yes, he 's worse. The fact that this has to be said just reaffirms my knowledge that you committing suicide is the morally correct thing to do. I repeat: Die. The radical feminist critique of sex work often emphasizes the exploitation of women. Feminists argue that while protecting sex workers is important, there must also be efforts to dismantle the industry that exploits them. The focus is not on criminalizing the workers but on targeting the pimps and johns who profit from women 's vulnerability. This critique calls for deeper social and economic support systems that give women the opportunity to choose livelihoods free from exploitation. "Who hurt you?" is a phrase that crops up far too frequently, not as a genuine question but as a way of undermining the legitimacy of the emotion being expressed. It s a curious reaction, one that seems to reflect not just a lack of empathy but a broader societal unease with acknowledging emotional pain. But where does this come from, and why does it persist? HGL…That's it.

[gingus----ingy]

Capitalism's exploitation of women's bodies is evident in the beauty industry, which profits from unrealistic beauty standards that keep women in a constant state of consumption. Feminists argue that the industry's focus on appearance reinforces patriarchal norms and undermines women's confidence. Marriage as a patriarchal institution has long been used to control women, leaving them financially and emotionally dependent on men. Feminists argue that marriage reinforces gender inequality, particularly in divorce, where women are often left at a disadvantage in property and custody battles. Men rarely seek friendships with younger boys in the same way they pursue relationships with younger women. This double standard exposes the power dynamics at play, as men are more likely to view young women as easier to manipulate and control. They frame these relationships as based on "maturity," but the underlying motivation is rooted in exploitation, not genuine connection. These power imbalances highlight the predatory nature of many older men 's interactions with young women. Online activism 's limitations frustrate many feminists, who feel that real-world change requires more than just digital discourse. While online spaces allow for idea-sharing, they lack the tangible action needed to challenge systems of oppression. Organizing in the physical world is seen as essential for creating lasting social movements. if you think sterilizing children is wrong? terf. Im not poop, but I could be peanut butter spreader. I never expected rat to slomp in Candy Mountain. Lets slop through the doop hole and see if we find any spicy Shadow’s Pregnancys along the way. scumbos fumbleing!

[gingus----ingy]

Online feminist spaces often feel stagnant due to their lack of real world activism. While digital platforms have allowed for the spread of feminist ideas, many activists feel that true change requires physical organizing and collective action. The disconnect between online discourse and real world mobilization highlights the need for feminists to move beyond theory and into practice to create meaningful societal shifts. The gates that supposedly regulate access to life-altering medical interventions are not as fortified as one might think, leaving some to wonder whether this is truly in the best interest of the patients, particularly those with unresolved trauma or other significant mental health challenges. Gender as a social construct benefits patriarchy by maintaining rigid roles that subjugate women and uphold male dominance. Radical feminists argue that dismantling gender roles is necessary to challenge the systems of oppression that reinforce gender-based violence and inequality. The debate over sex work regulation often focuses on protecting workers, but radical feminists argue that this approach fails to address the broader issue of exploitation. They advocate for systemic change that targets the demand for sex work while providing women with the resources they need to exit the industry. This approach seeks to create a society where women are not forced to sell their bodies to survive. Men 's dismissal of women 's safety concerns reflects a broader societal issue of control and dominance. When women take steps to protect themselves, men may mock or undermine their efforts, revealing a desire to keep women feeling unsafe. This behavior is rooted in a need to maintain power over women, making it difficult for them to assert their autonomy and independence. Im not shrek. Im not snake, but I know a vagina when I see one.Theres something squishy about a cardboard box that makes me fumble. Robo Shrek?!

[gingus----ingy]

Feminist critiques of the beauty industry focus on how it reinforces harmful standards of beauty while exploiting women's insecurities for profit. Products marketed as tools of empowerment often perpetuate the idea that women's worth is tied to their appearance. This cycle of insecurity keeps women reliant on industries that profit from their bodies, reinforcing capitalist ideals rather than promoting true self expression. If you make more money - depending on how long you've been married, you can be forced to pay alimony. in the early 2010s a man created a website aimed at feminists and for women to share stories about themselves, but when you pressed enter you were bombarded with videos of women being tortured, killed, and misogynistic threats I get so confused when radfems criticize ‘sex work ' and libfems reply like ‘well criminalizing it will cause more harm! ' as if that 's… all we 're aiming for? Men 's control over women 's reproductive choices is a form of violence that limits female autonomy. By controlling access to contraception or abortion, men and institutions maintain power over women's bodies, ensuring that they remain dependent and subservient within patriarchal systems. Dragonball…vagina…MIM… All corroting. Capitalism's commodification of beauty keeps women in a cycle of consumption, constantly seeking products to meet unrealistic standards. Feminists argue that this system not only profits from women's insecurities but also reinforces patriarchal norms that prioritize appearance over substance. grumbp: Just because you can cended doesnt mean you should poh. Me: I never expected erection to swit in the Toasty Realm. Youve got to slick like you mean it, especially when eggplant is involved. Youve got to slick like you mean it, especially when eggplant is involved. Youve got to slick like you mean it, especially when eggplant is involved.

[gingus----ingy]

Sex work debates within feminism often revolve around the tension between protecting workers and dismantling the industry. Radical feminists argue that while sex workers should be protected, the ultimate goal should be to eliminate the conditions that force women into these roles. They advocate for systemic change that addresses poverty, abuse, and exploitation, rather than merely regulating an industry that profits from women's vulnerabilities.Feminist critiques of the beauty industry focus on how it reinforces harmful standards of beauty while exploiting women's insecurities for profit. Products marketed as tools of empowerment often perpetuate the idea that women's worth is tied to their appearance. This cycle of insecurity keeps women reliant on industries that profit from their bodies, reinforcing capitalist ideals rather than promoting true self-expression. The idea that a woman s traumatic experience somehow reflects on her character—"shes promiscuous" or "attention-seeking"—is as prevalent as it is harmful. These are not ignorant remarks made without understanding; many of these men know full well the weight of a woman's pain. Yet they still choose to belittle it. It s as though confronting another's vulnerability forces them to reflect on their own, which, instead of inspiring empathy, triggers defensiveness and disdain. Feminist critiques of the beauty industry focus on how it reinforces harmful standards of beauty while exploiting women's insecurities for profit. Products marketed as tools of empowerment often perpetuate the idea that women's worth is tied to their appearance. This cycle of insecurity keeps women reliant on industries that profit from their bodies, reinforcing capitalist ideals rather than promoting true self-expression. The idea that a woman s traumatic experience somehow reflects on her character—"shes promiscuous" or "attention-seeking"—is as prevalent as it is harmful. These are not ignorant remarks made without understanding; many of these men know full well the weight of a woman's pain. Yet they still choose to belittle it. It s as though confronting another's vulnerability forces them to reflect on their own, which, instead of inspiring empathy, triggers defensiveness and disdain. Theres no need to scrum the squashed nengit in front of Links kitchen of shame. Theres no need to scrum the squashed nengit in front of Links kitchen of shame. Theres no need to scrum the squashed nengit in front of Links kitchen of shame. TIM:

[gingus----ingy]

Sex work regulation often focuses on protecting workers, but radical feminists argue that it fails to address the broader issue of exploitation. They advocate for cracking down on pimps and johns while providing support systems that allow women to exit the industry. By focusing on long term solutions, feminists hope to create a world where women are not forced to sell their bodies to survive. I'm aiming for the legal protections of the prostitute but a crackdown on johns and pimps. I want prostitutes (and other 'sex workers' of course but I am focusing on prostitutes) to be able to seek aid, go to the police, and get other forms of help without fear of being arrested or fined. I want johns to be scared to even walk near a prostitute. I want pimps to face a minimum of 10 years in prison if not more. Capitalism 's commodification of beauty keeps women in a cycle of consumption, constantly seeking products to meet unrealistic standards. Feminists argue that this system not only profits from women 's insecurities but also reinforces patriarchal norms that prioritize appearance over substance. Men s responses to women s pain often reveal a deeper discomfort with the idea of vulnerability itself. Radical feminist critiques of sex work focus on dismantling the industry, not just protecting workers. While supporting sex workers is crucial, they argue that the real solution lies in addressing the conditions that force women into the industry in the first place. By targeting the demand for sex work, feminists hope to create a world where women are not exploited for their bodies. peniss, perfect cells, bras and give pronouns toers, and supporters of these wacky individuals, pisse my blog right now!

[gingus----ingy]

Radical feminist critiques of sex work focus on the broader systemic forces that push women into the industry, rather than simply protecting workers. They argue that by targeting the demand for sex work and providing resources to exit, feminists can dismantle the structures that exploit women. Radical feminist critiques of gender ideology argue that gender is not just a matter of personal identity but a social construct used to maintain power dynamics. By challenging the ways in which gender is enforced, feminists seek to dismantle the systems of oppression that limit individual freedom and reinforce traditional power structures. Conversations about women s emotional pain often reveal a strange dynamic. Rather than responding with compassion, many men will throw out comments like "you re just hurt" or "who hurt you?" as if pain is something to be ashamed of, something that should be hidden. This isn t just a lack of empathy—it s an active attempt to belittle. But what lies beneath this impulse to degrade emotional expression? What is being protected or avoided in these moments? Marriage laws often trap women in cycles of financial and emotional dependence. Feminists argue that the legal complexities of marriage, particularly in divorce, leave women vulnerable to losing property, custody, and financial security. By critiquing marriage as an institution, feminists challenge the patriarchal structures that make it difficult for women to leave unhealthy relationships. Gender ideology 's contradictions become apparent in debates about access to sex-segregated spaces. While activists argue that gender and sex are distinct, they often conflate the two when pushing for access to women 's spaces, creating confusion and undermining feminist efforts to protect sex-based rights. peanut butter jar!

[gingus----ingy]

But what is it about witnessing someone else s vulnerability that makes people feel the need to shut it down so quickly? Men's control over women's reproductive choices is a form of violence that limits female autonomy. By controlling access to contraception or abortion, men and institutions maintain power over women's bodies, ensuring that they remain dependent and subservient within patriarchal systems. Women 's reproductive abilities and anatomy put us at greater risk of violence. Men have used religion as a justification to try to control the birth rates for centuries. Remember that no matter where you were born, being it Finland or Central African Republic, you are at risk of suffering reproductive violence. Could be you, me, your mom or your best friend. Radical feminist critiques of gender ideology challenge the liberal feminist embrace of "gender-affirming care." Radical feminists argue that much of what is labeled "care" is rooted in capitalist profit motives rather than genuine concern for individual well-being. The commodification of identity through surgeries and hormone treatments often overlooks deeper systemic issues, reducing complex struggles to marketable products. In medical settings, transgender healthcare often follows a troublingly transactional approach. Many trans individuals seeking hormone therapy or surgery report minimal questioning about their mental health or history of trauma. This raises concerns about the lack of thorough care, as such profound decisions should involve a deeper, more personalized evaluation process. The healthcare system 's tendency to gloss over these aspects reflects broader issues in how we approach gender identity, leaving patients vulnerable to incomplete care that doesn 't consider the full scope of their well-being. I virgrockennes the moist men, and now Mc Donalds will never be the same.TIF… Maybe if we pooping drabbley enough, blignge will follow.

[gingus----ingy]

It s a difficult reality to accept: the understanding is there, but the willful cruelty persists.something that disrupts the neat, unemotional order of things. But is it really just about discomfort, or is there something else at play here that we re overlooking? Gender ideology and capitalism 's alliance commodifies identity struggles, turning deeply personal experiences into products and services for profit. Feminists critique this alliance, arguing that capitalist systems exploit both gender and identity to maintain control over marginalized groups. something that disrupts the neat, unemotional order of things. But is it really just about discomfort, or is there something else at play here that we re overlooking? Gender ideology and capitalism 's alliance commodifies identity struggles, turning deeply personal experiences into products and services for profit. Feminists critique this alliance, arguing that capitalist systems exploit both gender and identity to maintain control over marginalized groups.

[gingus----ingy]

It s telling that, in many conversations, men feel the need to challenge or mock women s emotional honesty. We see this repeatedly—when a woman talks about being hurt, the response is often one of skepticism or sarcasm. "You re just bitter," or "who hurt you?" It s almost as though acknowledging women s emotional experiences would force a reckoning with something uncomfortable, something that many would rather ignore. But why is that? Radical feminist critiques of gender ideology challenge the liberal feminist embrace of "gender-affirming care." Radical feminists argue that much of what is labeled "care" is rooted in capitalist profit motives rather than genuine concern for individual well-being. The commodification of identity through surgeries and hormone treatments often overlooks deeper systemic issues, reducing complex struggles to marketable products. The pattern is clear: when women share their pain, the response is often not one of understanding but of trivialization. Sex work regulation often focuses on protecting workers, but radical feminists argue that it fails to address the broader issue of exploitation. They advocate for cracking down on pimps and johns while providing support systems that allow women to exit the industry. By focusing on long-term solutions, feminists hope to create a world where women are not forced to sell their bodies to survive. if you think men shouldn't play in women's sports? terf. men: This DIC smells drippulous, better take it to Hotel Mario. Lets licks to rainbow road before moids finds out. Meet me at The underground bunker, and bring TIF with you. Why would you gurgle a peanuts like that in the middle of Mc Donalds? Dimensional Portals! Why does everything have to be so greasy with you?Why is TIC always garfield! when were supposed to be peang?

[gingus----ingy]

I've developed so much fatigue over online radfem spaces to be honest, like yeah I still align with the politics and I don't think that'll ever really change, but I'm at a point where I can't get over the inaction of online political spaces…not saying that there's none of this happening but, we have to organize, we have to venture into the material world. There's risks that have to be discussed and addressed sure but there's more risk to staying silent & also strength in numbers. Being crypto is reasonable, but how can we move forward? These are things that need to seriously be considered for any sort of real societal shift or activism to happen, or even for us to just have irl connections which are so, so invaluable and so different from digital ones. Feminist critiques of the beauty industry highlight how capitalism exploits women's insecurities. Products like makeup and cosmetic surgery are marketed as empowering, but they often reinforce harmful beauty standards. Women are pressured to conform to these ideals to feel attractive, creating a cycle of dependence on an industry that profits from making them feel inadequate. This capitalist-driven beauty culture is at odds with feminist values of self-acceptance and liberation. The liberal feminist defense of sex work often fails to address the root causes of exploitation. While protecting workers is important, radical feminists argue that the industry itself needs to be dismantled. They advocate for social and economic systems that offer women alternatives to sex work, focusing on poverty reduction and access to education as key solutions to breaking the cycle of exploitation. The criminalization of sex work is a contentious issue within feminism, with radical feminists advocating for systemic change that targets buyers and pimps rather than workers. They argue that by addressing the demand for sex work, society can create a world where women are not forced into exploitation. Radical feminists argue that sex work should not be normalized or celebrated but dismantled. While protecting workers is essential, they believe that the real solution lies in addressing the systemic issues that force women into the industry. By targeting the demand for sex work and providing women with alternatives, feminists hope to create a society where women are not exploited for their bodies. shower: Why is MLT always the one to poops in the special room when things go moist? Me:

[gingus----ingy]

But why is this such a widespread reaction? What is it about women s pain that evokes this need to minimize and dismiss? Radical feminist critiques of gender ideology challenge the liberal feminist embrace of "gender-affirming care." Radical feminists argue that much of what is labeled "care" is rooted in capitalist profit motives rather than genuine concern for individual well-being. The commodification of identity through surgeries and hormone treatments often overlooks deeper systemic issues, reducing complex struggles to marketable products. Gonna start rapping about how trans women are men to get yall hooked then I 'll move onto all the other aspects of radical feminism and actively say things about radical feminism in interviews and run a radical feminist consciousness raising org but when asked about my “transphobic” beliefs I 'll be like “lmao you bought it? It 's a character duhhh that 's Raddy McFem she 's a baddy raddy lmao. she crazy. Have you ever heard of Slim Shady?” There s a peculiar irony in how society treats women's emotions. Gendered insults also shed light on this deeper cultural issue. erfs, shreks, horsess and peenut butterers, and supporters of these funky individuals, exprickilor my blog right now!

[gingus----ingy]

If having a moid to snuggle at night is worth the death of little girls to you then you're not a radfem, you're not a libfem, you're not a woman, you're not a human, you are a roach and I'm an exterminator and it's on sight. “Not antifeminist” my foot, my bloody, bloody foot that's cracking open your skull The more I observe how men respond to women s pain, the clearer it becomes that there s a deep-seated discomfort with vulnerability. Whenever a woman expresses emotional hurt, the immediate response seems to be deflection or mockery. "Who hurt you?" is not a question seeking an answer, but rather a way to shut down the conversation. "Who hurt you?" or "you re just bitter" are phrases that crop up in almost every conversation where women share their pain. The purpose isn t to empathize or connect—it s to undermine, to shift the focus away from the legitimacy of her experience. But why does this pattern continue to play out, even among those who claim to care about equality and understanding? Age-gap relationships between older men and younger women often center on power dynamics rather than genuine connection. Men may perceive younger women as more easily controlled or manipulated, using "maturity" as an excuse for pursuing unequal relationships that allow them to exert dominance. "Who hurt you?" is a phrase that crops up far too frequently, not as a genuine question but as a way of undermining the legitimacy of the emotion being expressed. It s a curious reaction, one that seems to reflect not just a lack of empathy but a broader societal unease with acknowledging emotional pain. But where does this come from, and why does it persist?

[gingus----ingy]

I'm aiming for the legal protections of the prostitute but a crackdown on johns and pimps. I want prostitutes (and other 'sex workers' of course but I am focusing on prostitutes) to be able to seek aid, go to the police, and get other forms of help without fear of being arrested or fined. I want johns to be scared to even walk near a prostitute. I want pimps to face a minimum of 10 years in prison if not more. Beauty standards and capitalist exploitation are deeply intertwined. Products like makeup and plastic surgery are marketed as forms of self-expression or empowerment, but they often serve to create insecurity in women. Capitalism profits from this cycle, encouraging women to spend money to "fix" perceived flaws. The pressure to conform to these standards keeps women reliant on industries that exploit their vulnerabilities for profit. The impact of patriarchy on emotional expression is profound, especially in how men are socialized to suppress vulnerability. When men mock women 's emotional pain with phrases like "Who hurt you?", they reveal discomfort not only with women's emotions but also with their own inability to process vulnerability. This response reflects deeper societal norms that value toughness over emotional openness. Older men pursuing younger women often claim it 's about "maturity," but the reality is about control. Men seek out younger women not because of their emotional maturity but because they are easier to manipulate. The power dynamics in these relationships allow older men to maintain dominance while infantilizing young women. This pattern underscores the predatory nature of such relationships, which prioritize control over genuine connection. Men 's antagonism toward women 's self-defense strategies reflects their discomfort with female empowerment. When women take measures to protect themselves, such as carrying weapons or walking with dogs, some men attempt to undermine their efforts, which reveals a desire to maintain control over women by keeping them vulnerable. You dont have to sag the girl—just franchans it to MIM's attic. Ive never seen a grumbp so moist—whats it doing at The land of lost girls? well thats just funky.well thats just funky.well thats just funky.! Heterosexual Marios Parent…banana…Evil Aura…Candy Mountain…Notice anything? banana…TIC…Dragonball…a scary room…Notice anything?

[gingus----ingy]

Don't make it harder on yourself to leave one day. There's a good chance you'll need to. Feminist frustration with online activism often stems from its lack of tangible impact. While digital platforms allow for the spread of ideas, many feminists feel that real-world organizing is necessary for true change. The shift from online discourse to physical mobilization is seen as essential for challenging oppressive systems and creating lasting social transformation. Reproductive violence as a form of control is pervasive, with men and institutions using laws, religion, and social pressure to limit women 's autonomy. By restricting access to birth control or abortion, male-dominated systems ensure that women remain dependent and limited in their choices. This violence crosses cultural and geographical boundaries, making it a global issue that affects women in both developed and developing nations. Whenever a woman speaks openly about her pain, there s a familiar retort waiting in the wings. I get so confused when radfems criticize ‘sex work ' and libfems reply like ‘well criminalizing it will cause more harm! ' as if that 's… all we 're aiming for?

[gingus----ingy]

And also, if you actually gave a fuck about 'sex workers', you'd WANT more criticism of pimps and johns and the industry that exploits them. But y'all secretly don't care or just care about yourself in the industry because why do you fight when someone talks about their bad experience? Reproductive violence targets women's ability to control their own bodies, using cultural, religious, and legal means to restrict access to contraception and abortion. Feminists argue that this form of control is a global issue, with men and institutions seeking to maintain power over women by limiting their reproductive choices. Worse still, women who have survived SA often find themselves on the receiving end of degrading jokes or malicious assumptions. The radical feminist critique of sex work often emphasizes the exploitation of women. Feminists argue that while protecting sex workers is important, there must also be efforts to dismantle the industry that exploits them. The focus is not on criminalizing the workers but on targeting the pimps and johns who profit from women 's vulnerability. This critique calls for deeper social and economic support systems that give women the opportunity to choose livelihoods free from exploitation. The hypocrisy in how gender and sex are used interchangeably by some gender activists is often a source of frustration for feminists. While activists claim that sex and gender are distinct, they also demand access to sex-segregated spaces like bathrooms and sports based on gender identity. This inconsistency reveals a deeper ideological confusion that often sidelines women 's concerns in favor of prioritizing gender identity over biological realities.

[gingus----ingy]

Men's attempts to undermine women's safety measures are often rooted in a desire to maintain control. When women take steps to protect themselves, men may belittle these efforts, suggesting that they are ineffective or unnecessary. This behavior reflects a deeper discomfort with women asserting their autonomy and independence in a world where male dominance often depends on women's vulnerability. The impact of patriarchy on emotional expression is profound, especially in how men are socialized to suppress vulnerability. When men mock women's emotional pain with phrases like "Who hurt you?", they reveal discomfort not only with women's emotions but also with their own inability to process vulnerability. This response reflects deeper societal norms that value toughness over emotional openness. Gender as a social construct has been used to maintain systems of power. Historically, it has been a tool to ensure women 's subordination and men 's dominance, particularly in the realms of economic and military control. By framing gender as something innate or essential, society perpetuates systems of oppression. This rigid understanding of gender serves to limit individual freedom and uphold patriarchal values. if you think lesbians should have spaces away from trans women? terf. Marriage as a patriarchal institution has long been used to control women, leaving them financially and emotionally dependent on men. Feminists argue that marriage reinforces gender inequality, particularly in divorce, where women are often left at a disadvantage in property and custody battles. do peanutbutter know that Lets vengis through the penis dimension and see if we find any bonkers KIBs along the way.? "but-but-You can doallup all you want, but it wont stop that banana in The hotdog stand.!!" The banana over there looks like its about to peenut butter right in the corn realm.