#this is such a fucking invasion of privacy

[darcytaylor]

When “Just Looking at the Evidence” Becomes a Problem

Before I get into this, I want to be clear - this is not directed at shippers who simply enjoy Luke and Nicola’s chemistry, those who appreciate them as people, or those who respect their private lives.

Shipping is a natural part of fandoms, and when done respectfully, I think it’s fine.

This post is directed at the people who have taken shipping to an extreme - those who have convinced themselves they are "just looking at the evidence" while weaving together wild, invasive, and often insensitive theories. At that point, it’s no longer shipping - it’s something entirely different.

Shipping vs. Fantasizing: Know the Difference

There’s a huge difference between harmlessly shipping people - whether fictional characters or even co-stars - and creating elaborate fantasies about real individuals. While shipping can be a fun way to engage with a story or fandom, projecting detailed, speculative narratives onto real people can cross into invasive territory.

Shipping: Enjoying the chemistry, friendship, or dynamic between people, often in a fictional or lighthearted context.

Fantasizing: Constructing speculative stories about real people’s private lives, often based on incomplete information (and flawed so-called "evidence") without regard for their boundaries.

Why Fantasizing About Real People Crosses the Line

When fans create elaborate narratives about real people, it can:

Blur the line between fiction and reality: Making it harder for others to separate speculation from truth.

Perpetuate false narratives: Leading to harassment or invasions of privacy.

Disrespect individuals: By reducing their lives to a storyline crafted for entertainment.

People are far more nuanced than the curated glimpses we get online or in public. Social media posts, photos, or even patterns of behaviour aren’t a roadmap to someone’s inner life or relationships. They’re just snapshots - fragments of a much larger, unseen picture. And often, those fragments don’t connect the way people want them to.

The Loophole That Isn't a Loophole

I’ve seen some people claim that Nicola saying "If you have an opinion about me, that's ok. I understand I'm on TV and people will have things to think and say, but I beg you not to send them to me directly" somehow gives them permission to speculate about things like pregnancy.

Let’s be real - that is absolutely not what she meant. She’s literally acknowledging that people will have opinions, but she’s also making it clear that things like that make her uncomfortable. Saying "Don’t bring it to me" doesn’t mean she’s fine with people debating her body - it means she knows shitty people exist, but she’d rather not be subjected to it.

And sure, maybe you’re not sending it to her directly - but you are still doing the exact thing that makes her uncomfortable. And by putting it out into public spaces, you’re making it far more likely that it gets back to her indirectly. So whatever justification people think they’ve found? It’s fucking moot. It’s still insensitive.

Belief Doesn’t Equal Truth

Believing you’ve pieced together the “truth” because some moments appear to align is misguided. It overlooks the unknowns - the context we’re missing and the layers that exist in people’s lives. Just because something can seem a certain way doesn’t mean it is that way.

Humility matters. Recognizing that no matter how much you think you know, you actually know very little. Taking a step back and saying, “I don’t know what’s really going on” is not only more truthful but also shows respect for the people involved.

It’s okay to want people to be together - innocent shipping of loving chemistry between people is okay - but it’s not okay to create wildly speculative stories that exist only in your own mind.

Humility in Speculation: Knowing What We Don’t Know

Here’s the truth - I don’t know the full picture. None of us do. I don’t know Luke and Nicola as people, and I don’t know the ins and outs of their personal lives. And that’s okay. I'm not going to piece together and come up with my own flawed story about other peoples lives.

What I do know is that certain theories and speculation can be harmful, even when people think they’re harmless. Just because something is being discussed publicly, or even “positively,” doesn’t mean it isn’t invasive. (Cough spreading invasive pregnancy rumors cough). It doesn't mean it is kind. The line between curiosity and intrusion is thinner than people think.

Even if you think you've “figured something out,” there is always so much more you will never see, hear, or understand. Just because an idea feels compelling or fits a certain pattern doesn’t mean it reflects the truth.

So before engaging in deep speculation, it’s worth asking:

Am I respecting their privacy?

Am I letting curiosity turn into entitlement?

Am I remembering that these are real people, not fictional characters?

On the Idea of “Being Duped”

I’ve also noticed some frustration in the fandom, with people feeling like Luke and Nicola somehow “duped” the public with their behaviour on tour.

What we saw on tour was not unusual for two people who:

Are comfortable with each other.

Work together (and especially in the acting world).

Have shared an intense, career-defining experience.

This kind of dynamic isn’t uncommon in the entertainment industry or in any field where people work closely together (I know from personal experience). Their bond is unique, but that doesn’t mean it has to be romantic. To me, it’s always read as a deep friendship, a strong professional partnership, and two people who genuinely enjoy working together. And it really is beautiful!

I think some people wanted their interactions to confirm a specific narrative, and now that things aren’t aligning with that, they feel misled. But that’s not on Luke or Nicola. It’s a reminder that interpretation is subjective, and that sometimes, we project our own expectations onto things rather than seeing them for what they are.

The Consequences of Unchecked Fantasies

Making up stories about real people and treating those stories as fact (even when you say that you are okay if you are wrong, or if you say that you are just speculating) adds to:

Noise and confusion: Amplifying drama and misinterpretation.

Unnecessary pressure: On the individuals involved, complicating their personal lives further.

Public harassment: Rumours often escalate, influencing others to unfairly judge or attack. Bringing it indirectly to the main people in your fantasies.

Sure, you can feel like you’ve pieced together a narrative in your mind that makes sense to you. But actors are human beings, not characters in a fan-fiction. They shouldn’t be stripped down to an idea of what you think they should or shouldn’t be doing.

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again - people are nuanced. People are dimensional. If you don’t know them personally, you have no idea what goes on in their day-to-day lives. A few curated moments from interviews or social media will never give anyone the full picture.

I’ve seen a lot of people build theories around what they believe is evidence. But if you really looked at it critically, you would find that much of it is based on assumptions rather than actual confirmation. It’s worth asking - are you trying to make reality fit the story you want to believe?

Public speculation/fantasizing can have consequences that extend beyond the screen - impacting the real people you claim to support.

[the-great-emperor-commodus]

YOU WHAT??? THAT'S A HUGE INVASION OF PRIVACY! HELL IT'S BREAKING THE LAW! WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU????

[he genuinely pissed]

Hey uhhhh I kinda slipped up and now your son knows about the xanax sorrryyyy!

@littlest-sunbeam-of-hermes

hm? oh yeah no they're aware, I'm not exactly hidden about it.

[folkpunkbumbercatch]

,

[nando161mando]

The lib stasi is monitoring those with ''negative'' views of health insurance companies

[multifandominfj]

Someone hold me back, because I’m about to jump over this table to fight Bitchabel for taking these photos, and Jesús for using them as blackmail.

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?! 💀🤬

[kotamagic]

Government bastards keep trying to push this through. Don't let them!

[howlsofbloodhounds]

searching up “anti silco” to read analysis and coming across jilco is a real vibe killer

[kerosene-saint]

if I ever become a musician you guys will sue TMZ if they report on my death right

[spideyhexx]

anon I hope you’re happy because all you’re doing is making me anxious and hate this place that I come to for an escape <3

[mister-forest]

Chiques fíjense de activar la opción de no compartir datos en el apartado "Visibilidad" en Ajustes ‼️‼️

[kittykatkatelol]

the urge to starve for this week because I'm visiting my grandma on Sunday who always has to comment on my weight and I've gained since last I saw her

queue incoherent screeching /neg

warning big vent in tags

[nando161mando]

Behold.. Idaho becomes the first to require ID.. for the PUBLIC LIBRARY. Knowledge and Thinking is the enemy.

[reallyunluckyrunaway]

YouTube and the way they exploit you and your children.

Youtube is pushing this idea of it being a kid friendly site. Despite the fact that for years, they've been involved in some of the most questionable Internet dramas.

A lot of their content creators and online personalities have been guilty of a slew of crimes, and yet they push their channels and garner ad revenue.

They claim to be in support of the LGBTQ+ community, womens rights, and racial justice... Just take a look on their official page. Yet they continually promote advertise and push content from hardcore incels, racist radicals, and right wing content creators.

See, YouTube says one thing, and shows another story. They'll even go so far as to put all these guidelines in place, no profanity, no sexual content. And yet there are plenty of videos dehumanizing women and pushing sexualized thumbnails, all catered to children. These channels are not taken down, and most of them are catered to children.

Their latest attempts to appeal to (and aid) the pedophiles on their site, (and perhaps running it?) is by far the most egregious and horrifying. Making it so that Creator's are forced to give them government protected private information. I'm talking PASSPORTS, PHOTOS, and HOME ADDRESSES PEOPLE.

Now you're probably asking yourself, why on earth would YOUTUBE "need" a government document... Well, that would make it so that young women, men, and KIDS are suddenly soooo much easier to find of course! Now they'll know exactly what you look like, where you live, and how to create a passport to take you somewhere far away!

Let's not forget that YouTube has had more than it's fair share of horrific stories come out... maybe we as a public should start questioning the people who are in charge of, and putting such creepy invasive things in place... YouTube claims to be a site for it's users, but do their true intentions linw up? Because all I've seen lately of their site is hate filled hate mongering practices. And insidious "guidelines" that basically act as a manual for human trafficking.

[snickerdoodlles]

Die

[toytulini]

"why are people mad about AI being pushed on them when they SHOULD be mad about all the privacy erosion??"

1) plenty of us bitches are mad and annoyed about both, actually.

2) the privacy erosion has become the normalized state of existence for the average person for the last 10 fucking years at least, its snuck in, they disguise it as Convenient Features to Help You Shop Better, and thats IF they bother telling you theyre doing it, instead of just opting all your shit in without asking, its so fucking normalized that yeah, a lot of people do not bother to question it, they just sigh in resignation and go, yeah, i guess, do i even have other options? and they do, but theyre an investment of learning and time you dont have capacity for at the moment, or maybe you do but you feel like you dont bc it feels like a bigger hurdle than it is, and computer stuff is already kind of intimidating, cos man, what if you hit the wrong thing and brick your expensive ass machine? easier to just let it data harvest, you guess, it cant be THAT bad, can it? plenty of people live like this, put up with this, seek this out, its easier not to resist the privacy erosion. fucking whatever, i guess. yeah, i guess twitter i mean X, or walmart, or facebook, can just have all of my contact info and my phone number and my birthday and phone contacts and bank information and fuck it, give them my ssn while im at it. less effort later. this is just how tech has been for the last 10 yrs. no one can effectively get rage clicks on this topic anymore bc we all fucking know. it sucks and we know. what do you want me to fucking do about it? i have other shit to deal with more urgently. etc

3)

you cant turn anything on or log onto anything or go anywhere without hearing about whatever new shit theyre throwing AI at for no real reason, no one will fucking Shut Up about AI, and its Annoying, man

[oflgtfol]

using my law & ethics class to judge eddie brock on his decision to protect his source re: the sin eater case